Urban tactics

True i lost fue good friends in that shit

Yeah looks like with enough rooms to clear casualties are inevitable

-Doctor Strange

Check the USMC combat manual. Marine tactics are all in buddy pairs, which is much more achievable, for civilians. LEA tactics are immensely useful, as well, as its all based in the two-man partnership and standardized tactics to coordinate multiple partner teams, in realtime.

Gotta appeal to these cod zoomers for the pending WWIII draft Russia vs The world

Watching KZhead videos ain’t embarrassing this video is golden.

@rob dabank Platoon level, your security squad are the outposts, the other 2 squads for mini raids and ambushes. Their greatest weapons? For their enemy they are invisible. The platoon leader keeps his company commander up to date through the C4 Network.

Nicely Grammar!

go watch garand thumbs recce video!

>urban warfare guide >not for city setting

Video game devs too.

Its basically the same, first u prepare ur own defense. When the enemy do the offensive, we do offensive too by trying to occupy what were they occupied

@@krisnaherdiana5273 huh...

@@don8659 just move your army back and forth, and try not to be killed on the process

U can look mcwp 3-35

Very simple, study the presentation here and reverse the roles in addition to adapting tactics to take advantage of the weaknesses exposed

What's a but. Is that a challenge

They dont give instructions to defend so defenders will be less educated than attackers. Beside jokes, I think mostly you need to do the same or you should to do reverse, focusing on enemy teams weak spots that you would like to avoid being on attackers side.

You don’t want to be directly behind the vehicle clearing the alleyway or road, the vehicle is armored so it is meant to bear the brunt of fire in case fire fight breaks out. Usually teams would split into two columns on either side of the road, bounding from intersection to intersection, keeping a spacing away from the vehicle in front in case of fragmentation or RPG while it clears the way.

U don't move in a stack, u always stay outside grenade range when ur moving in formation, u would be in a staggered column formation.if u expect contact u would either move in a bounding over watch or successive over watch. successive is preferred because ur lead team Will be more likely to make contact so ur trailing team can stay as the manuevering element

I would say that would depend on what your mission at the time would be, i.e. are there non-combatants, is your ROE Red Card, is it a capture task? There's many variables that contribute to that answer.

Sure, but grenades cost less

If town has been evacuated then use grenade. But there is a chance civilians could still be in the AO. If team security is of utmost priority over that of possible civilian deaths in an already evacuated zone and only hostiles are expected, then use grenade. However, understand that not all civilians obey evacuation orders. So you might end up tossing a frag into grandmas lap. Just keep that in mind for your future PTSD 😂

Fuck no. You throw a frag in that bitch. They still have positive control of their weapon with a flash bang

Pieing a room is much more dangerous than breaching it with flashes. If u have the resources, than flash then breach.

Also just go around or over the obstacle

@@DerexWolfheart Nothing prevents you from utilizing flashes while slicing....

@@ryandoty6048 ofcourse, you should totally use a limited resource to temporarilly disorient the enemy just so you can waste that time pieing the room instead of taking control of it in 3 seconds... great thinking...

@@DerexWolfheart I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the slice technique and why it is significantly safer than rushing into the waiting arms of the enemy.

It is better to have a better weapon...

@@DerexWolfheart What about ww2 weapons like mp40 or STG 44?

@@robertgreen6027 You are at a distinct disadvantage by using antiquated weapons and/or tactics.

@@ryandoty6048 oh, even tactics? How so? Imwriting a documentary. Not a huge one but, big enough. I need information.

@@robertgreen6027 If you were to use what was previously the most effective combat strategy, (Literally a large block of men) on a modern battlefield, you would be annihilated by artillery, air, missiles, machine guns, and armor long before you were able to engage the enemy effectively. It doesn't necessarily matter whether you have body armor, assault rifles, NVGs, etc. if you use tactics that have been made less effective, or ineffective. An unmotivated conscript with an AKM will probably not outperform an incredibly skilled shooter with a bolt action, however if that skill gap narrows any further, the differences in technology between the two are great enough to allow operator skill to become less important. You can get by with old equipment and tactics as long as either: A: Your opponent is so incompetent that pretty much any tactic would work; or B: Your technology is on the same plateau as your enemies. The M16, FAMAS, AUG and AK74 are on the same plateau. The M1 rifle, G43, SVT40, etc. is below that, followed by bolt actions, as you get progressively further behind technologically, until, at some point, you reach the rock. A rock is still capable of killing someone, but your troops armed with rocks would get pulverized by even a lightly equipped (my modern standards) infantry squad. That's just reality.

ohh akumaa...it is you..glad to see you

lmao

@@liamofarrell7751 i need promotion

Obviously no, no time. Grenade takes 5 seconds to detonate, a full ak47 mag can be emptied in around 3 to 4 seconds. A full ak mag could potentially take out a breaching team in the stack at close range, less than 50 meters. So, no time to toss frag if under pressure from outside, in this situation I would toss smoke outside the room on approach, then breach, if we were under fire. Usually in combat zone it’s standard operating procedure to toss smoke on your way towards the target building to cover your approach, if threat is suspected in the surrounding area, and it’s daytime.

@@izkh4lif4 Great info 👍 Thanks!

@@spiritsavage take my word with a grain of salt though, I study combat tactics but I’m not a soldier or in military service, nor do I have combat experience 😂🤙🏽 I read the marine corps MOUT manual where I learned about how they toss smoke for concealment before entry.

If ur taking fire and u want to react to that fire than don't toss the grenade cuz ur not gonna breach

@@DerexWolfheart Yee, it becomes a contested doorway at that point, no way anyone would rush into that. Cause human behavior.

Learn how to clone yourself. Seriously though, you don't want to try to do this solo. If you aren't trained extremely highly for it, my best guess is you probably want to just hide and get out of there while gathering as much information about the enemy as you can to bring squads back with you.

If you're by yourself you need to be in shape. So you can flight. Urban assault/defense is a team sport.

@@TheJakester1980 I understand that I'm just looking to apply it in a solo FPS video game sense. How to move and position yourself best not to be shot really. This is the best example I have found. kzhead.info/sun/abp-eKd8bIGBZ3k/bejne.html

One man CQB is a detriment to your safety. In your FPS, whatever it may be, get a good team and learn CQB tactics together. It’s worth it, and much more immersive, and it helps with creating good communication skills, teamwork, and using your brain to solve complex problems.

@@truenemesisprime550 the reason one man CQB is a 50/50 is because the art of CQB is about maintaining 360 degree security at all times, this is why teams use walls cause it slices off 180 degrees of security that needs to be monitored. One man is only capable of seeing around 60 to 90 degrees, 45 if in combat and tunnel vision sets in. It’s the same in video games, but tunnel vision is constant cause you have no peripheral vision, and you can’t turn your head to look around you, unless you have free look like in milsim games like Arma, but the limited field of view and controls inhibit your ability to engage a target like you would in real life. What is really hard to do with a team, both in games and real life is maintaining 360 degree security, cause you have to trust that your buddy will have his sector of fire and won’t be shot. The fundamentals of CQB is stealth, speed, and violence of action. Stealth means you must do everything to remain undetected, speed does not mean how fast you physically move forward but how fast you can identify and engage a target, and violence of action means deliberate and decisive actions meant to overwhelm your opponent through force and sensory deprivation, for example taking points of domination in a room and filling the room with bodies to overwhelm the enemy inside the room.

If you are by yourself, and you are facing a concealed enemy greater in number to you, you will have to get lucky to survive. Even if you are a civvy running around with no weapon in a hot zone, expect to be shot at from both Blufor and Opfor sides 😂, unless you have comms with friendly forces, then try to make your way towards your friendlies position laterally, let them know you are coming. do not approach from or towards their base of fire, or you may be caught in the crossfire if an active firefight is occurring. Use building and terrain cover for masking your position. Try to stay off roads, alleys, and walkways. Move through areas where you would expect very little foot traffic. If you are stuck behind enemy lines, you will have to sneak past enemy forces. Find a high building, unoccupied hopefully, where you can scout out possible movement. If you have a map, use it to identify your position and your friendly forces position via dead reckoning and whatever intel you had before you ended up in this God forsaken situation. Once you have conducted reconnaissance of your general area, use your brain to plot the path of movement towards your friendly forces so that you won’t be spotted. Good luck 😆🤙🏽

How do murder holes look like?

@@arepasexo it's a hole, in a wall, or ceiling.

Thanks!

Well then why don't you buy them a microphone that's suitable for the lifestyle in which you are obviously accustomed? The world doesn't need another asshat who thinks it's all about them, you entitled moron.

@@tampadeal2619 Woah there, Sgt Salty. Do you not agree that a better mic would make this guy easier to listen to for 30 minutes? Would it not make the whole thing just a littttlleee bit easier to understand and more palatable for everyone watching? If you're going to upload shit onto KZhead, it's not a bad idea to invest in a proper fucking mic. It's not that crazy of a concept. I'm not saying he's obliged to go out and buy some expensive thing, but complaints about a mic that almost sounds worse than a ham radio should be expected.

It's actually the headset from a vietnam era helicopter. It's for immersion and atmosphere

@Tampa Deal we could start over? Pardon me for insensitivity, i didn't mean any harm to anyone's fragile feelings or delicate sensitivities. Please don't take things I say so seriously, you might end up becoming upset...and i didn't intend any harm...just making a facetious comment. I'm sorry, brother. Have a good day, stay safe.

​@@d.cypher2920most polite marine ever

Imagine how its suck during real life map Fallujah on Iraq war event.

You just did it yourself tho 😶