The Dutch 'Military Revolution' During The Eighty Years War | Early-Modern Warfare

2020 ж. 29 Ақп.
538 259 Рет қаралды

The Dutch military reforms during the Eighty Years' War influenced the nature of European warfare strongly and lastingly. Facing the Spanish Army, the true military giant of the time, the Dutch were hard pressed to improve their own army with quick but decisive innovation.
The backbone of the Spanish Pike and Shot tactic was the so-called ‘Tercio’, a deep square formation consisting of pike men and shot infantry usually supplemented by cavalry and artillery. The basic idea was that the muskets and arquebuses shoot the enemies to pieces while the pikes provide sufficient protection from enemy cavalry attacks. But how did the Dutch counter this military goliath?
Recent historiography explains it as follows: During the Eighty Years’ War it became clear to Maurice of Nassau, prince of Orange, that he had to change his army significantly if he wanted to defend the newly formed Dutch federation. But during this period most armed conflicts actually weren't open field battles but sieges. As long as they were entrenched in or themselves sieging a fortress, the expert on this topic Olaf Van Nimwegen explains, the Dutch were well capable to go toe to toe with the Spanish. But it was crucial to have an effective force that could credibly challenge opponents in open field to prevent becoming the enemy’s puppet. The English officer John Bingham, who had served in the Dutch army, summarized this as follows: “he who is master of the field may spoyle the Enemies Country at his pleasure, he may march where he thinketh best” Thus, the Dutch were primarily concerned with ameliorating their capabilities in open field battles.
Patreon (thank you): / sandrhomanhistory
Paypal (thank you: paypal.me/SandRhomanhistory
We also have Twitter: / sandrhoman
#history #dutch #netherlands
Some of the music (this particular song is called the 'Landsknecht Music') was provided by MANIK dreams, a dear friend of mine. Check him out if you'd like to hear more.
• MANIK - Landsknechts M...
Twitter: / sandrhoman
Bibliography
Arndt, J., s.v. ‘Niederländischer Aufstand’, in: Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit.
Ayton, A., / Price, J. L., (Hrsg.), The Medieval Military Revolution. State, Society and Military Change in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, 199J. Black, A Military Revolution? Military Change and European Society 1550-1800, 1991.
Dierk, W., s.v. ‘Heeresreform’, in: Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit
Meumann, M., s.v. ‘Military Revolution’, in: Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit.
Parker G., The »Military Revolution«, 1560-1660 - a Myth?, in: Journal of Modern History 48.2, 1976, 196-214
Parker, G., Die militärische Revolution. Die Kriegskunst und der Aufstieg des Westens 1500-1800, 1990 (engl. 1988)
Parker, G., The Limits to Revolutions in Military Affairs: Maurice of Nassau, the Battle of Nieuwpoort (1600), and the Legacy, in The Journal of Military History, 71;2, 2007; S. 331 - 372.
Parker, G., From the House of Orange to the House of Bush. 400 years of Revolutions in Military Affairs, in: militaire Spectator, 172, IV (2003), p. 177-93.
Roberts, M.: The military revolution, 1560-1660. In: Clifford J. Rogers: The military revolution debate. Readings on the military transformation of early modern Europe. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo. 1995, S. 13-35.
Rogers, C.J. / Tallet F. (editors),  European Warfare, 1350-1750, 2010.
Rogers, C. J., (Hrsg.), The Military Revolution Debate. Readings on the Military Transformation of Early Modern Europe, 1995
Van Nimwegen, O., The Dutch Army and the Military Revolutions, 1588-1688.
Attribution for the map used in this video goes to: By Nederlandse Leeuw - Own work, based on File:Tachtigjarigeoorlog-1585.png by Stuntelaar CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index... (via Wikimedia).

Пікірлер
  • Some of the music (this particular song is called 'Landsknecht Music') was provided by MANIK dreams, a dear friend of mine. Check him out if you'd like to hear more. kzhead.info/sun/oNZ6cpyAfnx4ooU/bejne.html.

    @SandRhomanHistory@SandRhomanHistory4 жыл бұрын
    • Very nice music, definitely will check it out.

      @brianoneil9662@brianoneil96624 жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/epqBdtOjopSIraM/bejne.html

      @bharathr3759@bharathr37594 жыл бұрын
    • Man i would like you to do the introduction of the bayonet.

      @aker1993@aker19934 жыл бұрын
    • SandRhoman History I really appreciate you doing early modern stuff. An underrepresented period in history, both militarily and otherwise. I’ve always found this period right between firearms domination and melee domination fascinating. You have lines of arquibusiers as well as pickmen, swordsmen, and greatswordsmen all wrapped up in one! It really is kind of the crossroads of military tech and I like the diversity and novelty of the tactics.

      @midshipman8654@midshipman86544 жыл бұрын
    • SandRhoman History you should provide a proper licence for the map you used from Wikimedia Commons. That one is not public domain but Creative Commons and you are required to mention the author(s) and licence. Thanks.

      @DutchSkeptic@DutchSkeptic4 жыл бұрын
  • It's still mind-boggling for me as an American to try and comprehend the fact the dutch fought for 80 years to achieve independence. Our revolution was so short compared to it, it's hard to imagine holding out against one of the military juggernauts of the time for 80 years. Respect for these mad lads.

    @Jakob_Herzog@Jakob_Herzog2 жыл бұрын
    • It is pretty awesome yeah, there are still cannonballs lodged in houses in several cities. They are monuments now. Never mind the naval battles, those were insane too. Beating the spanish armada using a lot of rowboats is just funny to me.

      @bobloerakker7010@bobloerakker70102 жыл бұрын
    • National foundational myth. Spain was not a juggernaut, just a very poor country that got lucky finding some silver mines, even though most of the revenue was used to defend the silver (ships and castles). The Dutch were the juggernaut with a very strong fleet (stronger than the Spanish) and with plenty of money to build fortresses (at that time the defender had the advantage as the new style of fortress favored the defender) and pay foreign mercenaries. Also, look at a map and see where the Netherlands and Spain are and how you can bring reinforcements there. The sea route is very dangerous as France and England are most years hostile and the Dutch navy is stronger. The land route can be cut off at any time by the number one European land power, France, as they did for good in 1634. What is surprising is that Spain lasted so long, if they did it was because the Catholic Netherlanders (nowadays Belgians) helped them. Of course, real history is not as romantic as the foundational myth of the Netherlands, but if they are happy about it, why not.

      @alvaromartinez8209@alvaromartinez8209 Жыл бұрын
    • @@alvaromartinez8209 Although the history of the eighty years’ war has been romanticized in the past, I feel your comment could be a bit more nuanced. Spain was in fact a juggernaut in the 16th and 17th century. They held a gigantic empire that produced more than just “some silver.” Spain’s biggest problem was not a lack of strength, it was that they were spread too thin. If the Spanish had been able to double down on taking down the Dutch Republic they would probably have managed. The problem was that the Spanish Empire was constantly fighting wars all over their territory. Just to name a vey examples: naval battles with the Ottoman Empire, continuous conflict with the English on sea, bickering with the Habsburgs in the Holy Roman Empire, revolts in Portugal against the Spanish, constant conflicts with France and the protestant nations all over Europe. Just about every time Spain had its hands free to mount a committed attack the Dutch struggled to keep them out. The thing is that the Spanish never had the time to end the war before a more pressing matter demanded that they turned their attention elsewhere.

      @rikremmerswaal2756@rikremmerswaal2756 Жыл бұрын
    • @@alvaromartinez8209 Spain dominated Europe for a century lmao

      @rayzas4885@rayzas4885 Жыл бұрын
    • @@rayzas4885 if Spain was so dominant in Europe, why did it allow the Northern third to become Protestant and the South Eastern quarter to remain Turkish?

      @alvaromartinez8209@alvaromartinez8209 Жыл бұрын
  • This is one topic most history-based channels rarely cover and I'm glad you're making it. Keep it up, my dude.

    @Big_E_Soul_Fragment@Big_E_Soul_Fragment4 жыл бұрын
    • Wow, you’re still at every video I visit.

      @HaloFTW55@HaloFTW554 жыл бұрын
    • Tzeench got to you too, huh?

      @tompeck5495@tompeck54954 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah nobody cares about renaissances

      @florix7889@florix78893 жыл бұрын
    • @@florix7889 *Early modern age

      @pettet1956@pettet19563 жыл бұрын
    • @@florix7889 watch 80 year war from defragged history here on yt..

      @foetsie85@foetsie852 жыл бұрын
  • Very interesting to learn more about Dutch military tactics.

    @HistoryHustle@HistoryHustle4 жыл бұрын
    • History Hustle hey, kijk jij ook naar dit kanaal?

      @pieterstaal1199@pieterstaal11994 жыл бұрын
    • Nice to see you here History hustle ,

      @marcusfranconium3392@marcusfranconium33923 жыл бұрын
    • Rule NEERLANDIA , NEERLANDIA rule the waves, 🌊 🇳🇱🦁⚔️🦁🇳🇱🌊 Dutch NEVER NEVER NEVER will be slaves !!! 💂🏻⚓️💂🏻 With the most high courtesy to our British 💂🏻🇬🇧⚔️📖⚓️🇬🇧💂🏻Cousins.🤣😁🤣 God Save the King !!!

      @26vino@26vino3 жыл бұрын
  • As a Belgian I'm still sad Flanders didn't end up being an integral part of the united provinces

    @wachtwoorden2@wachtwoorden24 жыл бұрын
    • As a Spaniard i’m glad we got rid of the sunk lands... Still don’t know what we were looking for there in a time when marihuana wasn’t legalised or even known

      @anxeletemccolin699@anxeletemccolin6994 жыл бұрын
    • @@anxeletemccolin699 A lot of money came from the low countries. It was the most profitable region of the spanish empire. So i get why the spanish crown was prepared to fight for that

      @5thMilitia@5thMilitia4 жыл бұрын
    • @@anxeletemccolin699 spain inherited the low countries. they only decided to defend what was rightfully theirs by succession of the crown. of course the dutch couldn't be mad about this (the alternative would be life under the french, which is even worse), even though there were some revolts occasionally. the 80 years war only happened when nationalism and religious fanaticism reached a climactic point.

      @ProtoForte@ProtoForte4 жыл бұрын
    • Never understood why Belgians and Dutch are still separated. Religion isnt a topic anymore. They once were the seventeen provinces. Now the provices of Brabant and Limburg are divided, the Flemish lost a piece to Zeeland. Nice idea, the Low Countries from Luxemburg to Texel, with a reunited Limburg and Brabant. One negative point: they would become world champion football the next decades.

      @ajc.1012@ajc.10124 жыл бұрын
    • @@ajc.1012 i think basically the same reasons why the lithuanians dont want a union with poland. also the belgians would never accept an oranje-nassau as king of the belgians.

      @ProtoForte@ProtoForte4 жыл бұрын
  • Nieuwport is an interesting battle to me. Since the spanish tercios in flanders were probably the best soldiers in the world at that point. It was the major test for Maurice's reforms. You had a somewhat untested army relying on military reforms and breakthrough in approach to war facing off against the best the old way of fighting had to offer. The fighting was bloody and both sides got off worse than they thought they would.

    @ImperialGuardsman74@ImperialGuardsman744 жыл бұрын
    • the battle at nieuwpoort was a coincidence it wasnt planned

      @michielvdvlies3315@michielvdvlies33154 жыл бұрын
    • "Since the spanish tercios in flanders were probably the best soldiers in the world at that point."vs. "the Army of Flanders also became infamous for successive mutinies and its ill-disciplined activity off the battlefield, including the Sack of Antwerp in 1576. " the best soldiers do not act like that... Spain at that time got crazy amount of gold at its disposal and that is why it was so strong, it got nothing to do with any amazing formation. How you can even compare this guys with Winged Hussars that were winning battles with numerical disadvantage 40 to 1? In the Battle of Hodów most of the fight was not made on horses so you can't even use excuse that it is a cavalry not an infantry unit... there was over a century of Winged Hussars domination on European battlefields and victories with armies that got a huge advantage on paper. Russians got its independence day not because of Napoleon or Adolf... they both failed at doing something that Winged Hussars did without much problem.

      @Bialy_1@Bialy_12 жыл бұрын
    • @@Bialy_1 those sacks and mutinies happened because that gold (silver, actually) you mention didn't make it to the troops. That bit about the numbers... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1582_Cagayan_battles

      @jonatanduranmartin7916@jonatanduranmartin79162 жыл бұрын
    • @@Bialy_1 sacking doesn't mean you can't fight.

      @lolasdm6959@lolasdm6959 Жыл бұрын
    • A los españoles suempre se les pagaba en último lugar. Tras la toma d Haarlem en 1573, alos españoles se les adeudaban 30 meses d pagas. Los mercenarios si no cobraban, no combatían. Los españoles, aunque les debieran muchas pagas atrasadas, primero combatían y luego, se amotinaban; no al revés, como hacían los alemanes.

      @enriquebergos@enriquebergosАй бұрын
  • I love how people in the early modern era had the same knowledge we do today about the tactics and battle formations of antiquity.

    @54032Zepol@54032Zepol4 жыл бұрын
    • I think we have a better understanding, through archaeology and more available texts and better understanding of the latin and greek originals. But the Renaissance was called that, because of the rediscovery of the ancient texts after the fall of the Byzantine Empire.

      @rogerwilco2@rogerwilco24 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@rogerwilco2 No. The texts that survided the destruction made by the Europeans in the Fourth Crusade, when they sacked Constantinople. The texts that in many ocassions passed to Europe through the Muslims well before the fall of Constantinople.

      @herrero4270@herrero42704 жыл бұрын
  • Pretty sure what Gonzalo Fernandez did with the spanish army was a military revolution itself. People forget who created the pikenshot system

    @su_morenito_1948@su_morenito_19484 жыл бұрын
    • Nothing is a revolution and no single person created anything, it's always evolution which is based on things which came before

      @JayzsMr@JayzsMr4 жыл бұрын
    • Amaya Echeverría Yeah basically creating the pike and shot system. No achievements at all lol

      @su_morenito_1948@su_morenito_19484 жыл бұрын
    • @@JayzsMr "Nothing is a revolution" Here, comrade, you are wrong. Glory to worker's revolution! "no single person created anything" Now that statement is patently retarded, it's like you think inventors don't exist.

      @Criomorph@Criomorph4 жыл бұрын
    • It was not. Swiss Pikemen formations were a direct antecedent of the Tercios, the Tercios didn't raise from nothing. Anyway, this video is about the Dutch, not the Spanish.

      @herrero4270@herrero42704 жыл бұрын
    • @alvi syahri Well, not exactly the tower, but I agree.

      @herrero4270@herrero42704 жыл бұрын
  • Military history as taught to me in England. The battles of Hastings, Agincourt, Waterloo. The Charge of the Light Brigade at Balaclava. The First World War, the Second World War. That’s it, nothing else matters. Thank god for u tube !

    @robplazzman6049@robplazzman60494 жыл бұрын
    • Not even the English Civil War?

      @stanislauskusumobagus5266@stanislauskusumobagus52663 жыл бұрын
    • @@stanislauskusumobagus5266 Very little ! When we came to our exams it was the Industrial Revolution which bored most people away from history forever more...

      @robplazzman6049@robplazzman60493 жыл бұрын
    • @@robplazzman6049 pretty understandable, i had the same issue in dutch history class.

      @jochemvanrens8938@jochemvanrens89383 жыл бұрын
    • That's far people then what we learn in America. All we learn about is the civil war, American revolution, world war 1, and world war 2.

      @apersononlineyes6554@apersononlineyes65543 жыл бұрын
    • In the Netherlands we get the same but we get learn alot about our history

      @casper6405@casper64053 жыл бұрын
  • That moment when I need to make a historiographical paper on the Military revolution and you just gave me a lot of sources thanks man. Too bad the professors at Uni do not think highly of youtube historians otherwise I would definitely reference you

    @rikstan15@rikstan154 жыл бұрын
    • haha it's definitely cool to see that the vid helps! i'd reference van nimwegen. he also wrote a shorter essay in one of clifford's books. that should provide a nice overview.

      @SandRhomanHistory@SandRhomanHistory4 жыл бұрын
    • Well alot of people from the old school are thretend by "zee Internet", they also fear the lost of theire place in the Ivory tower. Just become a professor yourself and you can change things in the future.

      @general_alexus2533@general_alexus25334 жыл бұрын
    • KZhead Classes are BETTER than any class presented by an overpaid Liberal Egg Head Hack at any University...Much, much cheaper too...The Democrats Ivory Tower is rotten to the core and is just another arm of the Marxists/Progressives assault on American History... Why do you think CNN and NPR love it when Mobs destroy Historic figures? Trump 2020.

      @harrykuheim6107@harrykuheim61073 жыл бұрын
    • @@harrykuheim6107 lol, the world doesnt revolve around your country. maybe if you had a better education system you wouldnt say such things, you know how cheap european universities are? i paid 0 euros for 4 years of education. and there are no marxists in the US, the "democrats" are center-right in European standards.

      @apokos8871@apokos88713 жыл бұрын
    • @@harrykuheim6107 Your name means :Home for Cows" Kuh - German cow. "Heim" German Home. My Name is Kraft = German Strength. Regarding your comments about the Democrats They may be true. On the other hand this country has a Russian president and tax cheat. Now you have to weigh one against the other.

      @thenevadadesertrat2713@thenevadadesertrat27133 жыл бұрын
  • Always happy when KZhead suggests video's like this one. My recent history video binge has really shifted the algorithm in my favour. Great video, I learnt new things today. I had the great fortune of visiting Het Rijksmuseum some time ago when there was an exhibit about the 80 years war. A notebook with the described tactics was on display at the museum, along with a huge collection of Dutch muskets.

    @DJAvren@DJAvren4 жыл бұрын
  • This channel is truly unparalleled in its ability to analyze and objectively retell history:) love your work!

    @DefeatedRoyalist@DefeatedRoyalist4 жыл бұрын
  • I appreciate the academic bent to your videos, especially your emphasis on citing and quoting specific scholarly works and naming the authors so that we, as viewers, can follow-up on your research on our own if we want.

    @allamaadi@allamaadi4 жыл бұрын
  • youtube was missing a channel about this era of warfare. thank you for your work :)

    @apokos8871@apokos88714 жыл бұрын
  • *WILHELMUS INTENSIFIES*

    @napoleonibonaparte7198@napoleonibonaparte71984 жыл бұрын
    • 🇳🇱🇱🇺

      @kapiteingrasparkiet7574@kapiteingrasparkiet75744 ай бұрын
  • This is an excellent channel, I'm subscribed! As for the debate, I vote evolution rather than a revolution. Fire by rank was already invented at the Battle of Bicocca in 1522 (see my video). However Imperial tercios were so successful in the 16th century, that many commanders were of the opinion "if it's not broke, don't fix it". Therefore innovation in pike and musket tactics was simply put on hold. Same could be said for artillery tactics. The French used artillery very decisively at the Battle of Ravenna, however this innovation was also put on hold, as popular opinion of the day was that Spanish tercios were the only way to go.

    @pikeshotBattles@pikeshotBattles4 жыл бұрын
    • Seconded! I believe a term used by Rodgers to describe this was 'Punctuated Equilibrium'. A series of smaller inventions and breakthroughs in different areas caused a momentary shift in practice until the rest of the world caught up. Combined, those developments amount to the evolution of warfare over a period of roughly 200 years, from the late middle ages to the 18th century.

      @oilslick7010@oilslick70104 жыл бұрын
    • @@oilslick7010 Yesss. And if there was a revolution it should be attributed to Gustavus Adolphus.

      @pikeshotBattles@pikeshotBattles4 жыл бұрын
    • @@pikeshotBattles But that was my point: there is no single 'revolution' and Gustavus Adolphus was just one in a long line of people who made an adjustment. In this case: probably expanding on the experience with the 'Maurician' infantry tactics and developing it further. And after Gustavus there were other people who took it to the next level, and so on...

      @oilslick7010@oilslick70104 жыл бұрын
    • For me the only clear revolutionary military innovation of the 15-17th centuries that happened in a relatively short span of time was the art of the "trace italienne" in fortifications. The trace made overnight all other fortifications obsolete and made the defense superior to the offense. Thanks to the trace, weak armies (in quality and/or quantity) could hold large armies and wait until desertion and sickness would melt away the attacker. In the cases were the attacker won, it was often at a disproportionate cost in men and Treasure. Thanks to the Trace, wealthy but manpower-poor powers like Venice and the Dutch Republic were able inflict serious harm to their adversaries for a minimal cost in men.

      @alvaromartinez8209@alvaromartinez82094 жыл бұрын
    • Hey, nice to see you here. i enjoy your series on the Italian Wars quite a bit. Have been a sub of yours for quite some time :)

      @SandRhomanHistory@SandRhomanHistory4 жыл бұрын
  • Great content. You Baz and K&G are basically running an extensive world military history course. Excellent.

    @drlca6601@drlca66014 жыл бұрын
  • The proof that man is ingenious in waging war ... and the proof that your videos are, once again, informative, so well illustrated, ans so pleasant to look at!😍😍😍😍

    @philRminiatures@philRminiatures4 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks man, I really like your late medieval to early modern warfare history videos

    @donkdump8807@donkdump88074 жыл бұрын
  • Perfect video on history. It's Your fist video that I've seen and I really appreciate how You include specific references. It's like reading a scientific paper with proper citations on the topic. Subscribed and hit the bell button after 2 minutes of this video. Great job.

    @niu9432@niu94324 жыл бұрын
  • 8:00 that was also used by the Tercios.

    @angelmatesmolan@angelmatesmolan4 жыл бұрын
    • So, what? Have the Spaniards has to be protagonic in every video? This about the Dutch, not the Spanish.

      @herrero4270@herrero42704 жыл бұрын
    • @@herrero4270 I just gave extra information, don't be salty dude

      @angelmatesmolan@angelmatesmolan4 жыл бұрын
    • @@herrero4270 Yes, if you're going to speak about 16th-17th military tactics in Europe … YES, you've to speak about Spain. When you're going to speak about 16th-17th Dutch army, SPECIALLY. I do not know what the problem is.

      @LLULL-yn1rr@LLULL-yn1rr4 жыл бұрын
    • @@herrero4270 please don't cry

      @Angel_Gomez@Angel_Gomez4 жыл бұрын
    • 2:45 was also used against Swiss pikeman by Spanish "rodeleros", and they also were inspired by Roman tactics comparing Swiss formation as phalanx :P

      @JnSobre@JnSobre3 жыл бұрын
  • This was one of the best and well articulated info videos on early modern western military evolution. Bravo!

    @scottyoung2986@scottyoung29862 жыл бұрын
  • Another great video, proud to be a little part of it :-)!

    @moor-music9658@moor-music96584 жыл бұрын
  • Effective presentation ! Very understandable. THX Keep making videos like this one !

    @davidkardos2794@davidkardos27944 жыл бұрын
  • I just wanna say this is the first video I watched from your channe, and you provide a lot of crucial information regarding tactics of this time period and I thank you for saving me hundreds of dollars in books

    @VentiVonOsterreich@VentiVonOsterreich2 жыл бұрын
  • Just got your videos through the youtube recommendations system and already completely love them

    @iamhere6893@iamhere68934 жыл бұрын
  • So glad I bumped into this channel, high quality and entertaining

    @valdimarinn@valdimarinn4 жыл бұрын
  • Just found your channel, great content! Thank you very much for these lessons

    @RafaelCosta-oi3be@RafaelCosta-oi3be4 жыл бұрын
  • Always informative, thank you.

    @millardwashington6216@millardwashington62164 жыл бұрын
  • Lovely! I love those high quality scenes, a pleasure to the eye. Also it needs just a few more years in underground archives and van Nimwegen is turning into the Gollum of history...

    @mariushunger8755@mariushunger87554 жыл бұрын
  • i love theses vids. thanks for uploading

    @clintmoor422@clintmoor4224 жыл бұрын
  • I really appreciate how you source and credit your items. Well done.

    @klapsigaarenbasgitaar1931@klapsigaarenbasgitaar19314 жыл бұрын
    • Is hier ook een abattoir?

      @EvertfromNederland@EvertfromNederland3 жыл бұрын
  • found my new favorite military history channel.

    @thewitherchannel1053@thewitherchannel10534 жыл бұрын
  • The 16th-17th centuries of warfare are a very interesting topic, also good video!

    @darthwalrus4740@darthwalrus47404 жыл бұрын
  • I found your channel recently, really well done. Your english and german are good, nice animations and historically accurate. I like it here and shall subscribe, I'll be on a watch all videos marathon now.

    @planetoftheweek@planetoftheweek3 жыл бұрын
  • I really enjoy the content and style of your videos. Keep it up!

    @jonathanchambers4657@jonathanchambers46574 жыл бұрын
  • Your channel, sir, is very underrated

    @goganii@goganii4 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent video! I'm very excited for the one about Gustavus Adolphus and Breitenfeld!

    @oeufegg506@oeufegg5063 жыл бұрын
  • I love your videos bro! Keep up the good work

    @douglashammann1987@douglashammann19874 жыл бұрын
  • Love your videos! I work at a military museum, and I have your videos going on in the background as I work.

    @MightyElo@MightyElo4 жыл бұрын
  • I once read that the Dutch preferred small size mercenary units, because in case of a mutiny Dutch city militia could defeat a small size unit, but not a big one like a complete Tercio. To overcome big units in the field the ability to have these small size units work efficiently together needed to be developed. That the manipular system is the basis of the idea shows that principles remain constant and thus history tends to repeat itself as a series of idea and countermeasures.

    @intmartpract@intmartpract3 жыл бұрын
    • Good comment

      @roodborstkalf9664@roodborstkalf96643 жыл бұрын
  • Being a pikeman in the 16th century would be awful. If the cavalry never charges you just stand there watching your comrades drop to arquebus and artillery fire. And this is a great episode. This right here is why this channel rocks! It's not rehashing the already overdone topics. It's informative, properly annotated and well presented. This is good history.

    @brianoneil9662@brianoneil96624 жыл бұрын
  • Absolutely beautiful video!

    @painterforbeginners9613@painterforbeginners96134 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent video, very detailed information.Thank you.

    @adamscease4126@adamscease41263 жыл бұрын
  • Please talk more about heavy cavalry, You constantly mentioned how cavalry used to rain supreme for the longest time yet never focus on any battles where they crushed the opposition. In fact you only seem to focus on the cases where cavalry was beaten

    @soundofspace8026@soundofspace80264 жыл бұрын
    • not really important: -rain- --> reign Look up Alexander the Great, the phalanx formation was his anvil, and the heavy cavalry the hammer which flanked and crushed the opponent, even with inferior numbers at times. Not sure what the battle's name is.

      @AwoudeX@AwoudeX3 жыл бұрын
  • At this point, I knew all this stuff, but just like to see how different folks animate and portray the informatino. Nice job again.

    @AdamBechtol@AdamBechtol3 жыл бұрын
  • Classic and unique content... Awesome🔥

    @abhyudayasinhchauhan6499@abhyudayasinhchauhan64994 жыл бұрын
  • Great vid, thanks!

    @bredalocos076@bredalocos0764 жыл бұрын
  • THANK YOU. Finally I have the name of the document. 'Ordre op de wapeninge van het voetvolk'. THANK YOU!

    @faramund9865@faramund98653 жыл бұрын
  • Nice video showing that wars knowledge translate among nations through directing attacks or from learning past practice methods before in addition of field practice minds ( methods descoving ) of leaders or high officers

    @mohammadsaida4603@mohammadsaida46034 жыл бұрын
  • More early modern content please. I love it.

    @benm5913@benm59134 жыл бұрын
  • This is exactly what I want but can't seem to find anywhere!! Keep it up your videos are great and I desperately wait for the Swedish innovations to pike and shot.

    @danchu5588@danchu55884 жыл бұрын
  • It’s good to see a KZheadr focus on mainly pike and shot and early firearms warfare

    @theidotage1669@theidotage1669 Жыл бұрын
  • this is your best work yet

    @andreattafabio@andreattafabio4 жыл бұрын
  • How is it possible that in your video about the Dutch military Revolution, the name "Simon Stevin" isn't mentioned even once. Simon Stevin (1548-1620) born in Brugge, Flanders was a mathmatician, physicist, engineer and later a military engineer. He was the private teacher of prince Maurits of Orange. His role is largely unknown (because you are probably not encouraged to write a book about this new revolutionary style of fighting, you helped to develop, and publish it) but not to mention him at all is a big mistake. I only had to see that he was capable of deciding that Dutch was a better language than Greek or Latin when you want to explain something technical (so he used Dutch) and that he made up new Dutch words for it to explain things better (he made the better language even better), to know this guy had the potential to change the old ways into the new and the drive/arguments to make these changes happen. I like to think prince Maurits (not a dumb person himself) saw that too.

    @DreadX10@DreadX104 жыл бұрын
    • I can't name examples but i'm willing to bet that almost every evolution or revolution or battle has some poor guy who made a lot of it possible but is never mentioned. like some smugglar or a blacksmith of some sorts

      @EvertfromNederland@EvertfromNederland3 жыл бұрын
  • Oh my these videos are too good!

    @Richard_is_cool@Richard_is_cool4 жыл бұрын
  • BRUUUUUUUUUH Your format is SO good.

    @TakedownO44@TakedownO443 жыл бұрын
    • Thanks bud :)

      @SandRhomanHistory@SandRhomanHistory3 жыл бұрын
  • wow, I just like how you pronounce those technique names. On spot!

    @jimgaterj529@jimgaterj5294 жыл бұрын
  • You are a awesome youtuber. You teach me a lot what the warfare actually happen in EU4 period.

    @hoyinching9313@hoyinching93134 жыл бұрын
  • Spanish: I'm going to role play Alexander the Great's phalangites Dutch: Then, I'm going to role play Camillus Furious's Manipular Legions The Dutch actually created the 1st linear warfare in Europe, then the Swedes popularised it. If I remembered correctly Qi Ji Guang from Ming Dynasty also had similar reforms like the ones initiated by Maurice of Nassau.

    @ReviveHF@ReviveHF4 жыл бұрын
    • All this talk about Rome and Macedonia.....yes, the pikemen did resemble the Macedonian phalanx but at all times it was used offensively. But the idea behind the phalanx--most of the time--was to 'fix' the other side's infantry while the heavy cavalry did the real work of winning the battle. Such cavalry forces simply did not exist in the Spanish army.

      @julianmarsh1378@julianmarsh13784 жыл бұрын
    • @@julianmarsh1378 What are you talking about? Cavalry didn't even play a big role in Ancient Greece or Rome for the simple fact: Horses where the size off a big pony. The first in modern eyes horse came from China after the massacre off a city (80.000ppl) because they didn't hand over in chinees words fathorses( please google it if you don't agree) Nor the Dutch or the Spanish used heavy cavalry. Please be a good wannabe Historian and just shut up if you only now a part off the story and create whats lacking in your information.

      @newjones1754@newjones17544 жыл бұрын
    • @@newjones1754 What are YOU talking about? Unless you don't consider Macedonian armies to be "Ancient Greeks", you are worng. You should inform yourself carefully about the battles of Alexander and his use of cavalry as a decisisive weapon, in combination with the phalanx. And please be more educated and respect other's opinions Nobody wants authoritarian shiting over here.

      @herrero4270@herrero42704 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@herrero4270 Please tell me where I need to send a copy off my Master in Ancient. Med. civil to ? There is a big difference in the knowledge off the wannabee historians like yourself and professionals. The problem with people like yourself they don't know how much they do not know. In the Ancient world chariots where they only viable options. To call this type off limited warfare cavalry is an insult. I'm not even gonna explain the difference and evolution off the cavalry in the Middle Ages. Our Horses reach around 2 meter now a days but, if we go back to our own day and age in the 11 century they didn't get bigger then 58-60 inch 147-152cm. This is maybe in your language that is understandable for you. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horses_in_the_Middle_Ages Maybe people have problems with my English or they way I'm to people but, I don't care. Uneducated I'm not because my knowledge isn't just based on google or wikipedia and the final thing: Science doesn't care about your feelings so deal with it the fact that I have not even a little respect for people like yourself. On what is your information based to call it wrong? Because you don't understand it and have limited knowledge? You are trapped in The Paradox off Socrates.

      @newjones1754@newjones17544 жыл бұрын
    • @@herrero4270 How much do you think a battle tells you if you didn't take the time to know there background and ability's. Please go study your battles like you suggested and stay an idiot.

      @newjones1754@newjones17544 жыл бұрын
  • Tercios: *excist* Dutch rebels: So anyways, I started blasting

    @GoddessOfMars03@GoddessOfMars034 жыл бұрын
  • Hey, this is good work. So are your other videos. You've got a future here, kid.

    @seankessel3867@seankessel38674 жыл бұрын
    • heeey, how nice :)

      @SandRhomanHistory@SandRhomanHistory4 жыл бұрын
  • these are really fasinating videos! not the stuff u usually learn in school :)

    @weertangel7231@weertangel72313 жыл бұрын
  • Wow amazing topic, i just discovered this amazing Chanel :v

    @poncho9960@poncho99602 жыл бұрын
  • i just love the troop animations so much

    @ArtanisOwns@ArtanisOwns4 жыл бұрын
  • Good video!

    @MaxSluiman@MaxSluiman3 жыл бұрын
  • The Dutch system was more an evolution of the Tercio than a truly revolutionary system. Just as the Tercio was an evolution of the Swiss square and the Swedish system an improvement of the Dutch system.

    @alvaromartinez8209@alvaromartinez82094 жыл бұрын
    • Sounds like you're salty about events 400 years ago.

      @Matthijsklaassen@Matthijsklaassen4 жыл бұрын
    • @@Matthijsklaassen not at all. In fact, the better Dutch formation was still inferior to a Spanish or Italian tercio in open field battle as the quality of soldiers was lower. In other words, the improvements brought by the Dutch were not enough to decide the war. Eventually the Dutch won of course as Spain was also busy fighting "minor" powers such as France, England or Turkey. The Americans also claim they beat England during their own revolution while minimizing the decisive role of France, Spain and Netherlands distracting the British forces and Treasury.

      @alvaromartinez8209@alvaromartinez82094 жыл бұрын
    • @@alvaromartinez8209 yup definetly salty

      @jonneelskamp349@jonneelskamp3494 жыл бұрын
    • @@jonneelskamp349 not at all, that was centuries ago, I think some others are rather salty about 2010. In any case, for me a revolutionary innovation in military tactics as discussed here happens very seldom. The last one for me was the Blitzkrieg (or if you want to limit to a single combat arm, the stormtrooper tactics of 1918) as it was a radical change over previous methods and happened over a relatively period of time in a specific place. In the 16-17th centuries there were not truly revolutionary tactical innovations if my memory serves right except the "trace italienne" in fortifications. The Dutch tactics were a slight improvement, that helped make the Dutch army a competent field army but that was about it, they were not kicking butt left and right in field battles consistently as the Tercio had done or the Swedish army did later. The field battles were rare after the reform so it is difficult to gauge the effectiveness of the reforms. If it makes you happy, I gladly acknowledge the Dutch navy as the world's best in the late 16th- 17th century (with permission of the Flemish corsairs).

      @alvaromartinez8209@alvaromartinez82094 жыл бұрын
    • @ well, Catholic rule was not as bad, it just was not suited to the temperament of the Dutch. They rightly rebelled and that was it, I can understand the Spanish monarchy was too restrictive of their mercantile genius. The Portuguese also rebelled in 1640. However, other nations part the Spanish Crown (they were nations in their own right and enjoyed considerable autonomy) such as Sicily, Naples and Flanders had local rulers and Parliaments, voted their own taxes, kept their own language and the presence of Spanish troops was accepted with no problem. They also provided loyal and very effective fighting units to the Crown especially the Flemish corsairs, Sicilian galleys and Napolitan Tercios. Although the Northern Italians attribute the problems of today's Southern Italy to Spanish rule, it was not the case. Sicily and Naples were under Spanish rule intellectual and economic powerhouses, just a notch below the Low Countries/Milan/Venice and well above Spain that always remained backwards compared to Italy. That lasted until the unification of Italy. I am not saying Spanish rule made Sicily and Naples great, of course, what I am saying that the benign Spanish rule there provided peace and stability for the talent of those two nations to flourish. For some reason this did not work in Portugal and Netherlands, in the latter case due probably to the religious intolerance of the monarchy. Anyway, I wanted to make the point that Spanish rule was not as bad as some people think. Funnily enough, at some point (late 17th century) the Dutch started to help the Spanish in modern day Belgium, as they realized that the true danger for their hard-won independence was France which was always a centralization juggernaut. Today the very few Flemish speakers of the territories annexed by France (including Lille and Dunkirk) are very old, while the Spanish never tried to impose their language or customs in modern day Belgium. Same thing happened in French Catalonia or Basque country, in those two places French has taken over while in in Spain they enjoyed much more linguistic freedom most of the time.

      @alvaromartinez8209@alvaromartinez82094 жыл бұрын
  • This military evolution series excites me.

    @chrisbirch6513@chrisbirch65134 жыл бұрын
  • That's a good story I enjoyed your video

    @user-qy7fr9bu5m@user-qy7fr9bu5m4 жыл бұрын
  • The order of things could be better. Gets a bit messy at times. Overall good and thanks for a good video on an interesting topic!

    @erik5303@erik53034 жыл бұрын
  • Cannot wait for Gustavus Adolphus. Literally my history crush. I mean, have you seen his mustache?

    @johnginter145@johnginter1454 жыл бұрын
  • Dr. Emmet Brown is a historian too? What an universal genius!

    @blodiblodmann9207@blodiblodmann92074 жыл бұрын
  • In the south you can still clearly see allot of these large forts from west to east. There are even some who are towns, and they look amazing. I live quite close to several.

    @MasthaX@MasthaX3 жыл бұрын
  • I like the video, you gave a lot of percise information. It turned out to be a flaw - i didn't get what was the change about. Depth of ranks during shooting? That's enough to call it revolution? You didn't express and put enough emphasis on what was the point. But: great work. Never expect Dutch to be such a warriors ;)

    @janmajdowski@janmajdowski4 жыл бұрын
  • Grew up in Spain as a Dutch citizen, history about this period in school in Spain only made me love my tiny country more.

    @OneofInfinity.@OneofInfinity.3 жыл бұрын
    • As a Dutchman, I have to agree with my spanish wife, however, that one of the finest pieces of art ever to be produced in Spain is the painting informally known as 'Las lanzas' ('the pikes') by Velázquez. The official name is 'La rendición de Breda' ('the surrender of Breda') and can be seen in the Prado museum in Madrid. upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/Vel%C3%A1zquez_-_de_Breda_o_Las_Lanzas_%28Museo_del_Prado%2C_1634-35%29.jpg

      @hardanheavy@hardanheavy3 жыл бұрын
  • At 6:20, the video mentions the checkered order for these Dutch soldiers fighting Spanish Tercios, but in the Tercio video, it was mentioned that the Tercios deployed in a checkered formation for the same reason. Was there anything additional to this here? It seems like regarding refreshing tired troops, both factions had identical tactics.

    @dazbones6288@dazbones62884 жыл бұрын
    • Smaller groups ofcourse help with the speed of filling the weak spot routing units create. Which is very important in formations with less melee soldiers. Which helps with the ultimate goal of getting more guns in without giving to much away giving too much away in defence against shock troops

      @jemoedermeteensnor88@jemoedermeteensnor883 ай бұрын
  • very very good video, now I understand the sucess of Gustav adolph king

    @jairdesouza6454@jairdesouza64544 жыл бұрын
  • This was a pretty informative video to watch. I wonder what you would have to say about the Thirty Years War.

    @brokenbridge6316@brokenbridge63164 жыл бұрын
    • Hehe, very cool to see that I could make you curious =) I will write something on the thirty years' war for sure. Probably centered around Gustavus. I have some literature at home already (the video will take a few months to produce though).

      @SandRhomanHistory@SandRhomanHistory4 жыл бұрын
    • @@SandRhomanHistory---That's fine. I read about that war a decade ago. Still remember bits n piece's about it. And although I like the Swedish king. You don't quite have to make that video based around him. Just a thought.

      @brokenbridge6316@brokenbridge63164 жыл бұрын
  • Your channel is very interesting

    @_Channel-ce4vq@_Channel-ce4vq4 жыл бұрын
  • I always assumed that the Tercios ended at Rocroi and that Dutch had at an advantage in logistics, politics and overall strategy. Virtually everyone had a huge interest in Spain losing against the Dutch with the exception of Rome and Habsurg. Habsburg had Wallenstein doing the logistics and Tilly doing the field strategy, which almost decided the parallel Thirty Year’s War. As the video mentions Gustaph Adolphus II.: he indeed died in the saddle, as he was cocky and got caught by hostile cavalrymen. Let’s not forget Cromwells Ironsides as well. Battles during the English civil war were decided by the good and bad use of cavalry. Already in 1470 Duke Charles of Burgundy reformed his late medieval army after he had read Roman literature. But his armies got steamed over by Swiss, and those got destroyed in 1515 by the French who started to combine pitched infantry masses with artillery. It all comes back to logistics and available technology. The Dutch were leading in both wealth and tech- so they could afford to have an army like the one above. The evolution went hand in hand with the shift from feudal armies into a mix of royal national armies.

    @pascoett@pascoett4 жыл бұрын
    • And the entire Dutch warmachine was powered by their overseas trading and conquests of enemy trading posts. The Spanish had the most powerful land forces during that era but at sea they were struggling to protect their vast empire with the limited naval resources at their disposal. It didn't help much that most Spanish ships were lumbering galleons that could only run before the wind and were more or less giant, armed transports. During Piet Hein's capture of the Spanish Treasurefleet near at Bay Matanzas, the Spanish admiral in command didn't even put up a fight. After leading his fleet into the dead end that was the Bay of Matanzas, his feet were the first to land on the beach and he didn't stop running untill he had reached Havana, leaving his men to fend for themselves. Piet Hein was in command of a very powerful naval squadron for which the Spanish colonial navy were no match. Their main countermeasure was to try and avoid Piet Hein's force altogether and Hein was fortunate to catch the Spanish as they sailed past Havana, catching up with them near the Bay of Matanzas.

      @AudieHolland@AudieHolland4 жыл бұрын
    • @@AudieHolland Actually, a major part of the army funding came from weapons trading, and victuals (ammo, food and stuff). To the Spanish... That is why the raid on Wesel was such a hoot. It was a spanish supply post, which was taken by surprise (both sides were surprised it worked :) ). Then we could sell the supplies once again to the Spanish :)

      @j.p.vanbolhuis8678@j.p.vanbolhuis86784 жыл бұрын
    • @@j.p.vanbolhuis8678 That goes without saying, Mr. Bolhuis. But try explaining that to foreigners who are unaware of Dutch trade customs etc. This was probably one of the main reasons the war kept on going for 80 years. Too profitable for Holland to give it up while the actual fighting was done in Brabant and the Achterhoek. But for comparison, the significance of Hein's raid, from Wikipedia: "As a result, the money funded the Dutch army for eight months (and as a direct consequence, allowing it to capture the fortress 's-Hertogenbosch), and the shareholders enjoyed a cash dividend of 50% for that year." The value of the plunder was about 12 million guilders in 1600s money.

      @AudieHolland@AudieHolland4 жыл бұрын
  • LOL 10:30 PRODUCTION LINE OF DEATH!!!!!!(picture of Geoffrey Parker with a big smile on his face)hahahaha It's that infamous smile he puts on when he's on a killing spree!

    @santisomchay1978@santisomchay19784 жыл бұрын
  • I'm glad I found your channel! So great. Love the art and storytelling

    @AaxxReez@AaxxReez2 жыл бұрын
  • I love this! Thank you I am studying dutch history this made understanding warfare in that time easier. 🇳🇱 🇺🇸

    @23Revan84@23Revan844 жыл бұрын
    • America... So sad that they're brainwashed by the media all the time

      @cxarhomell5867@cxarhomell58674 жыл бұрын
    • Booster_Stranger True, but idc people do what they want. I just want my damn history.

      @23Revan84@23Revan844 жыл бұрын
    • @@23Revan84 Well, you gotta care since its america and the liberals would do anything to fuck you up. If you want your history, just study it kiddo.

      @cxarhomell5867@cxarhomell58674 жыл бұрын
  • Such a shame an amazing channel like yours with references, interesting topics,... Has so little subscribers.

    @napolien1310@napolien13104 жыл бұрын
    • maybe someday. people seem to like the recent stuff :) that's a plus in my book ;)

      @SandRhomanHistory@SandRhomanHistory4 жыл бұрын
    • @@SandRhomanHistory well yeah we love them, I have a topic it might interest you, it's about a man name, Federico da Montefeltro a Condettrier( mercenary ) a captain in Italy and a nobleman.

      @napolien1310@napolien13104 жыл бұрын
  • The cannon of Gustavus were also revolutionary. Their barrels were composite and much lighter. The inner tube was of copper and they were reinforced with leather, raw hide. These moved about the battle field far quicker.

    @markrowland1366@markrowland13663 жыл бұрын
  • Muskets are not as inaccurate as we think. They're about as accurate as a bow. You can consistently hit a human sized target at 100m with some training. The reason they might be inaccurate in large battles might be because of the smoke of the previous shots.

    @TanitAkavirius@TanitAkavirius4 жыл бұрын
    • @alvi syahri I'd say a war bow is probably more expensive than a gun. The biggest difference would be in the ammunition. Making quality arrows is very expensive and requires specialised craftsmen. On the other hand, musket balls are extremely easy to make in huge amounts, so is the powder. Maybe in the 14th and15th centuries it may have been more difficult, but by the 16th century gunsmithing and making gunpowder was well known. But a trained archer with a good bow and enough arrows is usually superior to a person with a gun one on one. Only in the 19th century and the widespread usage of quick reloading guns did bow become completely obsolete.

      @TanitAkavirius@TanitAkavirius4 жыл бұрын
  • Very well explained, love the presentation and art style

    @bloodrave9578@bloodrave95783 жыл бұрын
  • Wow amazing

    @chedabu@chedabu3 жыл бұрын
  • What is the program that you use

    @gabrielmsocas3913@gabrielmsocas39133 жыл бұрын
  • Everyone changed but the Tercios defeated them again and again (Dutch, English, Swedish, French..) in such great battles as Nördlingen. Tercios ruled the land over almost 150 years.

    @jaquemate7254@jaquemate72544 жыл бұрын
    • And then spain couldn't keep up anymore. In the years after the spanish army was outdated and if it was not for the dutch and english belgium would now be france

      @5thMilitia@5thMilitia4 жыл бұрын
    • @@5thMilitia Belgium should have been Dutch. Maybe if you hadn't spent those years burning women at the stake with your crazy branch of protestantism, you'd have a larger country today.

      @DudeWatIsThis@DudeWatIsThis4 жыл бұрын
    • @@DudeWatIsThis ??? Witch trials were not really a specific protestant thing ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_trials_in_the_early_modern_period ). Besides: Calvinism is not a crazy branch of protestantism. Perhaps you should read somewhat more about these matters: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_religion_in_the_Netherlands

      @grewdpastor@grewdpastor4 жыл бұрын
  • It's interesting to remember how inaccurate musket fire really is. I remember firing a reproduction musket at a target on a 3x3 sheet of cardboard at about fifty yards. After about fifty shots, only two or three actually kit the paper, never mind the actual target. Musket infantry formations were basically shotguns.

    @matthewlong9821@matthewlong98214 жыл бұрын
    • Yes, their early use was mainly to damage enemy morale. The thunderous blast that accompanied a volley was very unnerving to march against, and the knowledge that, unlike arrows, musketballs could easily penetrate practically any armor, mustve been a constant fear for soldiers.

      @omegastar19@omegastar194 жыл бұрын
    • @@omegastar19 no plate armor are resistant to musket fire at long range.

      @lolasdm6959@lolasdm6959 Жыл бұрын
  • Nobunaga Oda was the first in history to invent continuous rifle volley during the battle of nagashino where they inflicted massive damage to the Takeda cavalry in which they never recovered from.

    @akurmute2016@akurmute20166 ай бұрын
  • i have traced my dutch family back to 1401 one of my realitives name was colonol wolter hegeman he was a very conspious soilder. "it is written that his name and the rumor of his arrivail on the battelfeild terriffed the enemy "at the battle of deventer he took the works and captured the bridge defended the bridge then destroyed it. he captured the town of anhalt and the castle hattem. he was a hero at the seige of bronkhorst he went after a deserter while chasing him the deserter turned and shot colonol hegeman in the chest he died on that spot in 1578. he would be my great great grand father about 9-10 times removed.

    @johnhagerman8805@johnhagerman88054 жыл бұрын
    • cool

      @XxAfriCaNKinGxX@XxAfriCaNKinGxX4 жыл бұрын
    • i can also trace my family to new amsterdam now new york reverand adrian hegeman arrived in new amsterdam in 1652 he purchased 300 acres of land in flatbush making him the largest land owner, he purchased the land from peter stuyvasant. i have pictures of the oringnal deed with both singatures. he was the first burgemeester mayor of the five villages of brooklyn he.helped start the first dutch reformed church and school in flatbush . today the high school known as ermaus hall it was built on the site of the old dutch reformed church and school on the wall before you enter the front door there is a large dedication plaque that reads " on this site was the first public school of{ midwout} flatblush by the authority of the director and general council of the netherlands january 29th 1658 adrian hegemen teacher 1659-1671. and hegemen street runs thru brooklyn and flatbush.to this day.

      @johnhagerman8805@johnhagerman88054 жыл бұрын
    • @@johnhagerman8805 These traces don't really matter as you would have hundreds of thousands of ancestors in the same generation.

      @lolasdm6959@lolasdm6959 Жыл бұрын
  • Three things: 1) For spanish infantry pike was still important offensive weapon. 2) Dutch system to work need trained soldiers, Swedish infantry that fought in Polish-Swedish War tried fight in dutch style but gets smashed by polish cavalry in field. Protestant armies in first phase of thirty years war also tried this against catolic armies and failed. 3) By regularly paying soldiers, Maurice could create a disciplined and trained army that could use his reorm in the field.

    @TheSgruby@TheSgruby4 жыл бұрын
  • I hope you read this as I would like to know your opinion, one interesting thing is that I found is what happened in Brazil at the Battle of Guararapes in 1648 and 1649 I couldn't find any dutch accounts of the battles only a German contemporary source that gave a body count, but I have access to the portuguese-brazilian officers reports of battles and could translate them to you. Anyway, the interesting part is that it happened after the dutch military reforms, the brazilian reports seem to indicate the dutch army was composed entirely of muskets and pikemen, yet they suffered two crushing defeats at the hands of the numerically inferior Brazilian-portuguese army. At the first battle at one point it's stated that the brazilian portuguese army advanced towards the dutch and endured two volleys of musket and artillery fire before unloading in a single volley at very close range, which supposedly brought great disorganization to their lines and then the Brazilian-portugueses charged with SWORDS and were able to infiltrate the pikemen's lined and bring a lot of destruction to them. It's interesting because the dutch seem to have used everything their reformers got right, musket fire, pike lines, abandoning the use of swords etc and yet the Brazilian-portugueses were able to defeat their numerically superior force with a massed volley and a sword charge that actually broke the pikes.

    @fabiodafonseca3879@fabiodafonseca38793 жыл бұрын
    • On the second battle of Guararapes the portuguese-brazilian of 2650 entered combat with 5000 dutch professionals in 1649. Once again, the contemporary reports say: At first 800 Brazilian-portugueses fought 6 dutch squadrons with 2 cannons, the brazilians had no artillery. They exchanged musket fire for about 25 minutes, the portuguese-brazilian troops tried to cut their formation in a manuevre but that was repelled, once again the portuguese-brazilians charged with swords and once again they beat the dutch pikemen, "in spite of the brave resistance of the dutch pikemen". At all the other fronts the Battle was won and the cavalry performed it's traditional chasing job. In both instances the dutch pike formations were broken by significantly numerically inferior sword wielding infantry. Maybe abandoning all other melee weapons was absolutely superior as everyone assumes, but I don't know I'm just an idiot with an idea and would love to hear your insights.

      @fabiodafonseca3879@fabiodafonseca38793 жыл бұрын
  • Awesome!

    @choirboyzcutleryoutdoors@choirboyzcutleryoutdoors3 жыл бұрын
    • Thanks!

      @SandRhomanHistory@SandRhomanHistory3 жыл бұрын
  • Great video, any plan to make napoleonic warfare?

    @justskeptic@justskeptic4 жыл бұрын
  • Ah, i thought the reaction of the Spanish military to this new tactics would be covered! Still, great video!

    @celdur4635@celdur46354 жыл бұрын
    • Well, why should they be? Armies at that time have been playing around with formation so what the Spanish did to whoever, now the Dutch did to Spainish. The new Dutch formation still employed pike and musket except the Spainish would be outnumbered on fire power. The musket was still as inaccurate as before so we are not talking about Winchester Vs musket. This is more like 4231 against old 442 in football tactics that somehow you find yourself outnumber...

      @cyrilchui2811@cyrilchui28114 жыл бұрын
    • Though I haven't looked much into it, I'd guess that the Spanish adopted the Dutch tactics in turn.

      @AudieHolland@AudieHolland4 жыл бұрын
    • @@AudieHolland Likewise, when someone invented Bayonet, I am sure everybody just copied it.

      @cyrilchui2811@cyrilchui28114 жыл бұрын
    • @@cyrilchui2811 Ah, hold on. I just did the research. The Spanish reaction was that they lost the war.

      @AudieHolland@AudieHolland4 жыл бұрын
    • @@AudieHolland The Spanish where at war with England, France and the Netherlands at the same time, the latter of which was undergoing an economic boom and military revolution, and they managed to keep the southern Netherlands, now Belgium. so "lost the war" is not quite how i would put it. Those territories had been "lost" for decades, Spain mostly fought to contain Protestantism in Germany, and France inside its borders and it succeed. After the Spanish Empire lost its hegemony, Europe had to contain with the much more violent and ruthless French Empire, which led to the Napoleonic wars and WW1 and WW2-

      @celdur4635@celdur46354 жыл бұрын
  • As explanation is needed. The diagram shows the first rank firing and the moving to the rear to reload. However, in order to reload, they need to stand still. The diagram shows them moving forward again before the reloading is complete.

    @ardalla535@ardalla5353 жыл бұрын
    • you don't need to stand still to reload, this isn't a video game.

      @lolasdm6959@lolasdm6959 Жыл бұрын
  • Interesting thing, you spoke of the heavy guns of the Swedish king. If I recall correctly, the Swedish king was known to employ lighter guns which could be manoeuvred around the battlefield. Could you perhaps clarify this?

    @TheKingDain@TheKingDain3 жыл бұрын
KZhead