Why field watches are the only real tool watches left

2024 ж. 1 Нау.
169 236 Рет қаралды

Every manufacturer wants to sell you the luxury version of their tool watch. Gold submariner. Canopus gold Speedy. Pave Royal Oak. But there is one watch the resists the pressure to become fully luxury. It's the humble field watch. Here's why.
Let's dive in.
Consider leaving a comment if you having something you feel would add to the conversation. Be respectful and polite, please. Also - leave a like if you enjoyed the video and consider subscribing if you want more.
Cheers. 😀😀
For inquiries and collabs: twtw.mike@gmail.com

Пікірлер
  • I served in the United States Marine Corps for 22 years. I went to the field to train and to do real world Marine things. Afghanistan, Iraq, Philippines, Sri Lanka…I wore Timex Ironmans. When I wasn’t in the field, I wore my TAGs. Watches my wife gifted me every time I was promoted. All of the watches have a story. My wife purchased all of my TAGs at the Marine Corps Exchange

    @CaptainWillard830@CaptainWillard8302 ай бұрын
    • Just out of curiosity... did you chose them and she paid for them? It would drive me mad if my wife would buy watches for me, because it is totally subjective and even a function of time, whether you will like and wear a watch.

      @urosbernik3033@urosbernik30332 ай бұрын
    • Thanks for sharing. My guess is those watches have a lot of memories attached to them 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
    • @@urosbernik3033 she selected them without my input. Thankfully, my old lady has always had great taste and knows what I like. I’ll be honest, I was so busy back then with work, I rarely thought about what to wear as far as civilian attire and accessories. When I wasn’t in USMC attire (dress, utilities, or physical training attire), I was in khaki trousers, sensible shoes, polo or button down shirts, and not concerned at all about trendy fashion. I did once want a Rolex Submariner, but never could afford it with two little kids, and a wife, to take care of. Today, I can afford a Rolex, but now love my Omegas, TAGs, Seikos, and Casios. Maybe one day my wife will gift me a Rolex

      @CaptainWillard830@CaptainWillard8302 ай бұрын
    • Maybe she bought her lovers Rolexes? *badum tsss*

      @yarly3180@yarly31802 ай бұрын
    • @@yarly3180 Good old Jody! He gets around with that mullet and smooth talk. Running around with Submariners, greasy hair, STDs, and Crocs

      @CaptainWillard830@CaptainWillard8302 ай бұрын
  • The burger analogy is by far the best thing I’ve heard in a long time. Ill carry this analogy to more aspects of my life

    @elrockerchido@elrockerchido2 ай бұрын
    • when did he say it

      @wifine1951@wifine19512 ай бұрын
    • Who doesn't like a burger... ?😃😂

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
    • @@wifine1951 13:30

      @patrickclancy150@patrickclancy1502 ай бұрын
    • Perhaps "fish and chips" would be more likely. No body wants his/ her watch to be inexpensive junk.

      @crux314@crux3142 ай бұрын
    • @@crux314 Not sure of your location, except that the "fish and chips" reference implies UK. Here is the US there are routine fast food burgers that might be classified as inexpensive junk, but we have many good restaurants that serve burgers that would make you rethink your desire for seafood.

      @patrickclancy150@patrickclancy1502 ай бұрын
  • I just got into watches recently and my first purchase was a Citizen 37mm Garrison Chandler. Eco Drive movement for no fuss operation/maintenance, legible Arabic numerals on a stark, black dial, basic lume, day-date feature, an arrow in place of the 12 and 100M WR on the stock canvas strap. Works for me. Simple and effective.

    @amilyester@amilyesterАй бұрын
  • I had my heart set on a Ranger, then I saw the Sinn 556 A and went with that. A lot less money and a really good quality watch.

    @jimg518@jimg5182 ай бұрын
    • How's the .223 model?

      @dre32pitt@dre32pittАй бұрын
  • I simply enjoy your eloquent explanations. I find it like great book material. Have a great time.

    @danigomb@danigomb2 ай бұрын
    • Appreciated kind sir 😃😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • I have been thinking about classifying watches into different categories and wearing watches on different occasions. This video made me realize that for me, its all about what emotions does a watch evoke when you put it on you hand. I am a lot into hiking, spending time in nature or at least parks, outdoor exercise of any kind, walking whenever I can. When I put on a field watch, it just evokes in me memories about hiking and nature and spending cool time with my parents in nature, generally very nice memories. Also, when I go exercise or do something in casual clothes in general, it just feels right to put on a field watch. When I dress more smartly for office, It just feels right to have a dressy watch on wrist. I dont wear divers for the most part except when I actually go swimming. Not sure why It works like that for me, its all about feeling 'right' and evoking the right emotion at the right time.

    @nikolastojanov8749@nikolastojanov87492 ай бұрын
  • I personally don’t use the word “tool” anymore when talking about expensive mechanical watches. When you say, “use as a tool,” do you mean the act of reading the time? Really enjoy these theoretical discussions.

    @Explorer40mm@Explorer40mm2 ай бұрын
    • I teach, and so I often use aspects of mechanical watches as tools: - often, the lessons aren't one hour, but 45 or 50 minutes, and sometimes they start at odd times. Thus, a diving bezel is helpful to remember when the lesson ends, especially when you are mentally occupied with other things. - bezels and stopwatches are also useful for small exercises within the class. But I agree: a casio would do the job just as well.

      @doyouwanttogivemelekiss3097@doyouwanttogivemelekiss30972 ай бұрын
    • It's like when people use the word ''beater'' for a stainless steel Rolex or Tudor. It means what the individual wants it to mean. Most people don't have the career or hobby to truly use these watches as a ''tool'', so guess for some people it's a tool as long as it tells the time and looks good as an accessory.

      @OpheliaNL@OpheliaNL2 ай бұрын
    • @@OpheliaNL and I’m not even sure anyone has a career where they need an inaccurate mechanical watch for precision timekeeping. These things are mostly just fun little trinkets for cosplaying. I’m a diver, I’m in the field, I’m James Bond, I’m an astronaut, I’m a pilot, I’m a train operator, it’s all about imagination and dress up for adult men.

      @Explorer40mm@Explorer40mm2 ай бұрын
    • @@Explorer40mm haha sounds about right.

      @OpheliaNL@OpheliaNL2 ай бұрын
    • @@Explorer40mm I disagree partially: I need a watch.

      @doyouwanttogivemelekiss3097@doyouwanttogivemelekiss30972 ай бұрын
  • I've taken a dive into the watch world and at the end the only one which I ended up using on a daily basis is a 70€ Lorus Lumibrite with a day/date function. Convinience is what makes it stand out for me, even if it lacks all of Casio's functions. It does it's job quicker than a phone.

    @matricious@matricious2 ай бұрын
  • - Authentic field watch to work outdoors in the dust and mud is a Casio G-Shock. - To sit in clean environment and talk about what is a tool watch, is a Rolex Explorer or Hamilton Khaki (and the likes). - Burger analogy is spot-on.

    @handlehbt@handlehbt2 ай бұрын
    • -agreed -agreed -🍔

      @JoeCC0087@JoeCC00872 ай бұрын
    • That may be an authentic modern field watch , and almost certainly the best fit for the job, but we have needed and used field watches way before 1983 ( first shock ) or 1969 ( first quartz) so the other field watches cannot be discounted. The American A 11s and the uk dirty dozen watches have been used in the military for 75 years you can say that about the g shock ..... Yet .

      @PabloTBrave@PabloTBrave2 ай бұрын
    • 100% true for a long while . if you look at a list of watches with genuine use behind them in history, outside of dive watches you will see brands like gylcine hanhart ball Hamilton. I’m always fond of telling people in the first bourne movie he wore a quartz tag. nobody ever wore a Rolex for anything but showing off.

      @Robert-vw3od@Robert-vw3od2 ай бұрын
    • I have one watch. A 2017 37mm Yachtmaster with platinum bezel that I wear when hiking, swimming, skiing etc. all over the world. Don't be that all so knowing tool who thinks what he says is fact.

      @davidr2802@davidr28022 ай бұрын
    • @@davidr2802My apologies. It was just my humble opinion.

      @handlehbt@handlehbt2 ай бұрын
  • Well, I've got an Eterna Bumper produced in 1942. That watch has actually been 'in the field', which makesvit a true field watch

    @mortenblomandersen4041@mortenblomandersen40412 ай бұрын
  • My newest watch - The Tudor Ranger. Love it.

    @jag1099@jag10992 ай бұрын
    • Yeah tried one on at my local shop, and it’s way nicer than I thought. Awesome watch

      @mrautomatech2329@mrautomatech23292 ай бұрын
    • I've been owning a Tudor Ranger for almost one year now. It's the best daily I ever had. The watch is absolutely perfect for what it is, nothing has to be changed. In its own mystical way, it is simply gorgeous ❤

      @DocMulholland@DocMulholland2 ай бұрын
    • Love the butt plug hour hand. Perfect for exploring new ground and charting unseen depths.

      @DeepFriedDoom@DeepFriedDoom2 ай бұрын
    • Not tool watch or field watch..

      @djrudog1158@djrudog1158Ай бұрын
    • I'm hoping to purchase one in near future 👍

      @richardstiles6370@richardstiles6370Ай бұрын
  • I work in healthcare at a correctional facility. The correctional officers require a watch as part of their uniforms. 19/100 use an apple or android smart watch. 80/100 west G Shocks. The G shock is in my estimation the true, toughest modern day field watch. 1 officer wears an Omega seamaster professional. I’ve started to wear my G shocks there. It’s nice to blend in well.

    @kofiofosu9051@kofiofosu90512 ай бұрын
    • Great testimony. I can understand this.

      @drkesrf@drkesrf2 ай бұрын
    • G-Shock is a lot of go-to picks. I was in the Army. I used an Armitron digital. It was more useful due to it's easy to read and use stop watch function.

      @Overlord277@Overlord2772 ай бұрын
    • On the spot in todays watch world. The question I have is that we sometimes seek some kind of differentiation but at the same time simplicity .

      @miguelribeirodesousa9851@miguelribeirodesousa98512 ай бұрын
    • G-shock for the win 😀😀

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
    • how are you allowed to wear a watch at healthcare?

      @dimatha7@dimatha72 ай бұрын
  • Fantastic video, you couldn't use best words to explain why fild watches are definitely my favorite ones. Thank you for your work 👌

    @andreasantonastaso5735@andreasantonastaso57352 ай бұрын
    • You are very welcome, and thanks for taking the time to say so 😃😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • I would just add one thing to Mike's thorough analysis/perspective of what makes a true "tool field watch" that Mike did not overtly state. A person who is buying a true field watch for its simplicity to read the time also wants to buy it as a "beater watch". Meaning I am going to use it at the gym, at a construction site (or other manual labor job), sweat in it, swim in it, biking with it, go rock climbing with it, even go to the office with it, or all of the above! The point being is that I want a watch that can be scratched or I can get dirty without worrying about babying it. The most important features are is it steel or titanium, and inexpensive to the point where I do not worry about scratching it. I guess a person who only wants to buy a field watch for its life style vibe would buy a Patek Philippe 5226 in white gold, but not someone who is going to beat the heck out of it in the field!

    @dannysimenauer5745@dannysimenauer57452 ай бұрын
    • GADA watch

      @theshadow1812@theshadow18122 ай бұрын
    • @@theshadow1812 GADA means/stands for?

      @dannysimenauer5745@dannysimenauer57452 ай бұрын
    • @@dannysimenauer5745 Go Anywhere Do Anything

      @DavidMTurner@DavidMTurner2 ай бұрын
    • ​@@dannysimenauer5745it means "go anywhere, do anything"

      @stevendearing3792@stevendearing37922 ай бұрын
    • @@stevendearing3792 thanks!

      @dannysimenauer5745@dannysimenauer57452 ай бұрын
  • I love this ad about Oris rebuilding a watch. Beautiful. I watch it almost every time. Beautiful music too.

    @demej00@demej002 ай бұрын
  • An absolutely brilliant review with an absolutely brilliant ending.

    @Robert-vw3od@Robert-vw3od2 ай бұрын
  • PP 5226 is GORGEOUS! I love that watch. I love plain faced watches, mainly with numerals at 12, 3, 6, and 9. (sometimes more like in the 5226). My daily wear tool (?) watch is a Timex Hodinkee Waterbury Limited Edition. I love the pebbled face of the dial and the simple legible dial layout.

    @TheSlowoldman@TheSlowoldman2 ай бұрын
  • Great channel, well researched, well crafted, and eloquently and succinctly presented. Thank-you.

    @jhors7777@jhors77772 ай бұрын
  • Great video. You've reached into my thoughts and perfectly described my core watch strategy. Couldn't agree more with you.

    @jb-hw9if@jb-hw9if2 ай бұрын
  • I love listening to your analysis of different watch topics. I picked up a Bulova Hack about 9 months ago and it has become my daily driver. Its about half the price of a Khaki and the most accurate mechanical I own.

    @donaldknapik2706@donaldknapik27062 ай бұрын
  • Awesome explanation of tool watch . Love your channel. Thank you 😊

    @w.alexanderholt9338@w.alexanderholt93382 ай бұрын
  • I love my Ranger. I enjoy having well made things that don't scream "luxury." As with many products, restraint in design often leads to a more fulfilling ownership experience. Don't get me wrong, there are times I like my watches a little more fancy, but sometimes, a quality understated tool is what I want. Thanks for the video.

    @TheMutchlerchad@TheMutchlerchad2 ай бұрын
    • I love my RANGER aswell, superb piece 👍

      @paulgregory2601@paulgregory26012 ай бұрын
    • @TheMutchlerchad; I like understated, even "functional" appearance, but, where possible, some kind of "internal elegance"... the "field watch" genre (although i admit to having a day/date) is useful, readable, no battery to charge or replace, robust enough to wear wherever, whenever..and, for me, "luxury" is not something that i consider very much...if it looks like a "field watch", and is wonderfully well-made, and fits in the mould of "those who know, know, those who don't know, don't concern me.." maybe it's like the "de-badged" high-end Mercedes, or the not-so-obvious RS-6 "station wagon"?

      @lohikarhu734@lohikarhu7342 ай бұрын
    • I love mine as well. The micro adjustment on the bracelet just works so well, and I find myself adjusting it at least a couple of times in the day.

      @darrenbayman8988@darrenbayman89882 ай бұрын
    • I totally agree but Went with the 2017 omega railmaster. Only the clasp is Better on the Tudor to my eyes but it still is a great piece…and affordable. The fact the railmaster is discontinued also means you won t see it everywhere

      @MrMaxc6po@MrMaxc6poКүн бұрын
  • Love your straightforward explanation. Really helps.

    @mikeb6459@mikeb64592 ай бұрын
    • Glad you think so! 😊

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • Great point of view . Down to earth , intelligent perspective . Very much enjoyed .Thank you .

    @ivanmoralesbello1@ivanmoralesbello12 ай бұрын
    • Thank you kindly! 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • I have the Hamilton Khaki 42 with green nato strap. Love it!

    @MountainRancher@MountainRancher2 ай бұрын
  • Rocking a Hamilton Bronze Khaki here, a gift from my son. I adore it. Upon my demise, the watch enters his collection.

    @billymania11@billymania112 ай бұрын
  • It's refreshing to see a focus on functionality and simplicity over luxury in the watch world.

    @wristcouture@wristcouture2 ай бұрын
  • Thank you for this great video, Mike! It reminded me why I love my unpretentious Sinn 856 so much! Please keep up your excellent content!

    @burkhardlange9280@burkhardlange92802 ай бұрын
  • I have always loved the Field watches, easy to read.

    @Remboken@Remboken2 ай бұрын
  • Excellent video. You've just given me another reason to love my 124270 Explorer even more. It really is about as luxurious as a field watch should be without compromising its role as a tool.

    @solverxd@solverxd2 ай бұрын
    • it is labelled as a tool watch but let's be honest, it is luxury. A tool watch is a Gshock

      @ninjesus4079@ninjesus40792 ай бұрын
    • ​@@ninjesus4079 it is priced as luxury but it is just a good quality field watch

      @yusufbest4475@yusufbest44752 ай бұрын
  • I have the polished version of the khaki and absolutely love it. Its my work watch i wear to the office and great for when occasionally i need to go out into the field.

    @Jindsing@Jindsing2 ай бұрын
  • Mike- your discussions are prescient, intelligent, and unbiased. I have been yearning for a field watch and have considered precisely what you discuss here. I would add that the best field watches are more than simply the design and construction. The best examples have a back story and an air of authenticity. Personally, I like the Ranger, the Hamilton 38 Murph, and the IWC Mk XV.

    @boatdetective@boatdetective2 ай бұрын
    • I try, and am happy you enjoy my approach 😃😃 IWC for me.... 😃😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • Just purchased a Christopher Ward C65 Sandhurst field watch and love everything about it. I also have a Hamilton titanium khaki field, and alternate between the two.

    @francoisfournier2903@francoisfournier29032 ай бұрын
    • How does it compare to the Hamilton?

      @daveLin104@daveLin1042 ай бұрын
  • If we are going to imagine anyone actually uses each watch for it's original purpose this makes me feel I've saved a bunch of cash by sticking with the kaki feild for my choice of feild watch. I love its simple design.

    @simonwright6882@simonwright68822 ай бұрын
    • I have 2 nice dressy divers with 20 ATM. I have only used them as office watches.

      @unwokeneuropean3590@unwokeneuropean35902 ай бұрын
  • Just found your channel from a post on WatchCrunch and this is the first video I watched from you. Smart, well thought out commentary. Subscribed.

    @e_d_v_a_u_s@e_d_v_a_u_sАй бұрын
    • Welcome aboard - Thanks a ton 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch29 күн бұрын
  • 1. Thank you. Your description is spot on. 2. My daily beater watch is a 40 year old Wenger military field watch. 3. Someone mention the Timex Ironman. I have 4 used ones. I have one remaining new one to gift. I give new Ironman watches as beater watches to high school and college graduates.

    @bdcochran01@bdcochran012 ай бұрын
  • Excellent. I like the cross compare in a segment.

    @chriscaton1901@chriscaton19012 ай бұрын
  • Big fan of my two Hamiltons. They just feel perfect on my wrist. Large numerals are most appreciated.

    @stevehill8993@stevehill89932 ай бұрын
  • Just subscribed. Love the way you analyze every little detail in your videos, and your calm personality 👍

    @TheZax85@TheZax85Ай бұрын
    • Welcome aboard! 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatchАй бұрын
  • Great video again from my #1 YT person. Delightfully refreshing to hear clear and structured thought 👍 I loved my Hamilton Khaki. I thought I was getting a 2824, but instead had the very first Powermatic out. Terribly unstable timekeeping. Ruined a great watch. I had to chuckle that you came down for the Tudor in the end. I picked up my 224270 up yesterday! After "only" a six month wait. So cheers 🤦

    @catsteeth@catsteeth2 ай бұрын
    • Thanks again! and luck you!!! 😃😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • I enjoyed your presentation very much. Just wanted to throw in that I ordered my first field watch this February. I was persuaded by the Mad Hacker to support his launch of his very own Field Watch. Listen to his sales / specifications speech and you may understand why I was hooked. Plus it’s wind up. Cheers R

    @richardmonsell3899@richardmonsell38992 ай бұрын
  • Great channel, arguably the most informed and seemingly least influenced out there, I congratulate you. However you have missed the Seiko SARB017. Arguably the purest and most functional field / alrounder of them all! Love the content 👌

    @jbe6812@jbe68122 ай бұрын
    • For the past 10 years, my daily watch has been the Seiko SNK805. What I like the most about it, apart from the size and legibility, is the position of the crown at 4 o'clock. It is never in the way. Tragically, Seiko has stopped producing the clock, so I will have to find a couple of late production ones still out there somewhere.

      @pergustavsson2424@pergustavsson2424Ай бұрын
    • I don't remember when I got it but I've been using an SNK805 for years. Threw a dark brown leather strap on it and it's a damn nice watch for being "budget"(use to be, they're twice what I paid for now). I love simple watches.

      @Leadlobotamist@LeadlobotamistАй бұрын
    • Now I am wearing the srpg35, I found it can jump from field to formal casual changing to black leather strap .

      @joseluismalagagranda4785@joseluismalagagranda4785Ай бұрын
  • Great video and topic. There’s something so refreshing and charming about the utilitarian spirit and unpretentious yet efficacious design of a field watch. I think you’re right in saying that sometimes less is indeed more. Simple uncomplicated three-handers can deliver a lot of enjoyment. I own ta Serica 4512, a modern no non-sense field watch, which is perhaps just a tad more sophisticated than your average hammy. And in fact the Murph 38 was Serica‘s main contender and lost also for a question of budget. But when it comes to field watches I have to mention the CWC G10 and W10. Especially their quartz variants deliver great value for watches that have historically been issued to the British army. I‘d love to add a W10 to my collection at some point!

    @DeeEx27@DeeEx272 ай бұрын
  • Fantastic video. Thank you for the hard work and the comments. I wonder if you would consider the Omega Railmaster closer to a field watch or to a tool watch. Please let me know

    @HERRESHOFFGSD@HERRESHOFFGSD2 ай бұрын
  • I have a bronze Hamilton Khaki for the reason you mentioned- simplicity. I can wear and forget. It is light weight with an olive NATO strap, so I can wear it in the garden, at the side of a rugby pitch or working on the car. I do have a Bremont Broadsword as well. It is on a stainless steel bracelet, Bremont did not have an attractive strap when I bought it. A nice clear face but much heavier- heading towards a dress watch. Very rugged, it is the one I tend to wear when I am travelling, it covers all the bases for a business trip in Asia.

    @nigelmattravers5913@nigelmattravers59132 ай бұрын
  • Reminds me of the KISS saying... Keep it simple stupid... You get the basics right and then they will be superb. I probably like the Draken Aoraki most. Its well made... Its tough... It has a faraday cage in it... It a great field watch! Have a great one Mike!

    @johanvandersandt8904@johanvandersandt89042 ай бұрын
  • That was very good and got me thinking about my relationship with my Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic 42 on bracelet, which ive always loved. Busier then the mechanical, it also starts to push that boundary (slightly) but remains firmly toolish because...i only paid $500. And that's another essence of the field watch, it's important not to pay too much.

    @markikn3183@markikn31832 ай бұрын
    • Right on! 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • First time to this channel and I learned more about watches in this video than any other video I have watched so far.

    @RCSFragrance@RCSFragrance25 күн бұрын
    • Glad you found it worth your time 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch22 күн бұрын
  • citizen eco-drive field watch $100 15 years ago and still going, has gone through hell, oil sand, salt water, mud, 30+ meter dives on weekly basis. Light, small, simple, cheap, durable for sure and always on time with zero adjustments or maintenance. A set it once and forget it type.

    @miopera40@miopera40Ай бұрын
  • Extremely well thought through and articulate video. A real discovery, reminds me a bit of Watchfinder some years ago.

    @Anaesdoc@Anaesdoc2 ай бұрын
    • That's high praise - Thanks a ton 😃😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • Great analysis as always. I had exactly this idea on my mind lately, and you put on words way better. :)

    @devileanblack@devileanblack2 ай бұрын
    • Glad to hear it! 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • I've been owning a Tudor Ranger for almost one year now. It's the best daily I ever had. The watch is absolutely perfect for what it is, nothing has to be changed. In its own mystical way, it is simply gorgeous ❤

    @DocMulholland@DocMulholland2 ай бұрын
  • My favorite field beater travel watch is the Hamilton H70455523. Within the last ten years I have worn it on five different continents. On a nato it still wears fairly slim. I actually use the date complication when I travel compared to home where I prefer time only watches

    @jespervver4181@jespervver41812 ай бұрын
  • Thanks for the vid. Already anticipated it since I woke up today. Perhaps the sushi comparison might have fit better, given the idea is to focus on the taste of the single most important ingredient (the fish in most cases), as opposed to other cuisine like French, Italian or even burger, where the combination, despite being simple, is key. And yes, the Hamilton Khaki is the field watch

    @user-cg7tw5yc9n@user-cg7tw5yc9n2 ай бұрын
  • Sinn makes some great field - tool watches. 556 and the 856!

    @Ego_Katana@Ego_Katana2 ай бұрын
  • I love field watches... My favorites are Hamilton Expedition & Spirit Titanium...

    @Sumerdini@Sumerdini2 ай бұрын
  • Thank you ❤. Not only have you treated me with another great video but you’ve also covered my absolutely favourite watch style. I like sports/divers watches (who doesn’t), I appreciate nice chronographs, but eventually my heart always goes to the simplest watches of all - field, no date, brushed. I love mechanical watches but I don’t want to loose on accuracy. That immediately sends me up the market. Somehow I didn’t connect with Sinn, my first proper field watch was Longines Spirit Titanium. Near perfect - light, accurate, legible, but - just as your theory says - it was too much. Too much gilt, too much detail on the dial. Great watch, but 6 months later I had to find it a new home. Months or research and trying different models at ADs allowed me to narrow the list down to two pieces- Tudor Ranger and Omega Railmaster. I love them both, both have what I’m looking for in an everyday watch. Keeping in mind my recent failure with Longines I decided to go with simplicity and buy a Ranger. Omega RM still catches my eye whenever I see it, but after nearly 7 months with Tudor I feel I’ve made a right choice. Love this little watch to death. Also, to your point about dress and field watches being close to each other - fully agree. Looking for a more formal watch I went with Omega Seamaster 1948 70th Anniversary Limited Edition. “Town, sea and country”. Almost field, but still very much a dress watch. Love this topic, thanks for sharing. Cheers.🍻

    @gremlin76@gremlin762 ай бұрын
    • Glad to hear that this vid hit a little closer to your heart. As for your final choice: Spot on 👍👍😀😀

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • The Tudor Ranger is my favorite of the field watches you touched on because its screw down crown, legibility and overall quality vibe on the wrist.

    @ghegeler@ghegeler2 ай бұрын
  • After a lifetime of disposable timex's(and a really nice Seiko) my tool watch for the last 3 deployments was a GMT II- worked great, did everything I needed and took a lot of punishment-so, in my eyes, the best field watch I've owned.

    @michaelpeters5696@michaelpeters56962 ай бұрын
  • After the dive watch, I"d say the field watch is the most popular style out there. That's why there are tons of affordable options in addition to the models you show in your video. One of the better-known budget field watch it the Timex Expedition. They made a gazillion of them in different styles and one can see them quite often on the wrist of any given stranger on the street.

    @Deconstructeur@Deconstructeur2 ай бұрын
  • Excellent and thought provoking video.

    @pimba11@pimba112 ай бұрын
    • Glad you liked it! 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • Thank you - a work of clarity. But as asked, for me a Hamilton Khaki. I would take down a mine, cross a desert or climb a mountain. Strikingly plain and handsome too.

    @paulwakeford4453@paulwakeford44532 ай бұрын
  • I have been in the US Infantry for the netter part of 9 years, and I have been absolutely thrilled to pick up a Rolex Explorer. I have had a deployment with this watch along with numberous training events where it gets thrashed left and right for the last two years. Using this watch as a tool watch, as it is originally intended, is what makes this piece so awesome. All the cool functions that come from a G-shock are cool and all, but we never use any of it in the real world; no need for the world time, no need for the stop watch function etc. We typically carry a GPS anyways that has all those functions. So why not train in style? The 100m water resistance gives me a lot of faith when working in harsh weather conditions and even during swim events. Even though it is a "luxury brand", i still think Rolex still has their head in the game for making some absolute beaters of a watch. When people say this watch can fit any situation, ill tell you what; it absolutely does.

    @shoeshiRoll@shoeshiRoll2 ай бұрын
  • Excellent content, as always. Thanks.

    @ttothec@ttothec2 ай бұрын
    • you are very welcome and thanks for sticking around 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • My go to field watch is the Tudor BB36 gloss black dial. It’s simple, sporty, and the perfect size.

    @markhamjeff9104@markhamjeff91042 ай бұрын
  • Excellent 👍 I wear Hamilton khaki field mechanical as my daily wear. Love it!!

    @richardstiles6370@richardstiles6370Ай бұрын
    • Thank you! Cheers! 😊

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatchАй бұрын
  • Timor Heritage ATP (reissue) at 36.5mm is a really great field watch aesthetic. I enjoy it on leather or a Forstner metal band. My only gripe is the big crown, whose shape and position have caught on a sweater cuff a couple times and been pulled open. anOrdain Model 2 at 36mm is a sweet, modern field watch, its crown is protected, and it sits close to the wrist. Both bring a lot of joy.

    @spoketube@spoketube2 ай бұрын
  • When I finally set out to buy a field (tool) watch my first look was to the Rolex Explorer (39mm). I liked the heritage, reputation, and look. But in reality I liked the look of the Explorer 1016 much better. To me it had "the look". But the 1016's are getting pretty old and very expensive for a decent one. Fast forward a couple years and the newest Tudor Ranger arrives on scene. It's well built, has a modern/rugged movement, a great size for my 7 1/2" wrist, and had that Explorer 1016 look. I don't think I could be any happier about this purchase. I use it golfing, hiking, bike riding, and all sorts of work inside and outside my house. It did take me awhile to fully appreciate this Tudor and now I have a hard time giving my other watches time on my wrist.

    @roamy3605@roamy36052 ай бұрын
  • I bought a plain brown bag watch for actually being in the field. A tool watch is a watch that gets scratched and doesn't become a bummer. It tells a story. I have a Seiko Field Sport Automatic w/ the NATO strap. Personally , I want the date and time on the watch. For when you're in the field for long days. My next field watch will be the Hamilton Khaki, even though it doesn't have the date. The Hamilton keeps with the plan.

    @charliefoxtrot7219@charliefoxtrot72192 ай бұрын
  • You nailed it. I think you could have even thrown the Longines Spirit into the conversation. Regarding the G-Shock...things with batteries like to act up in very cold weather and very hot weather, so I might argue that a mechanical watch is better suited to temperatures more on the extreme side.

    @dalesmith7250@dalesmith72502 ай бұрын
    • I found my mechanicals were somewhat bothered by the difference between -15°C in the German winter and +35°C during the S.E. Asian hot season. Much more than my gshocks and eco-drives.

      @wayneholmes637@wayneholmes6372 ай бұрын
  • I love my Sinn 104 but I also love my Seiko 5 sport. The Sinn has a touch of luxury (stainless), day and date are essential for me. And the bezel is a handy timer without adding chrono weight and bulk. Funny, I mostly wear the Seiko 5.

    @magic3817@magic38172 ай бұрын
  • What a great discussion. I present that the sinn 556 is the peak tool watch currently available as you describe the idea in this video.

    @m07c@m07c2 ай бұрын
  • your intro was describing invicta. " only chronograph with a meteorite face" shopNBC goid days

    @tomdoe5698@tomdoe5698Ай бұрын
  • Totally agree with your burger analogy.

    @autostereoptic@autostereoptic2 ай бұрын
  • Amazing how you can talk for a quarter of an hour about this topic, with excellent and well thought through arguments. Well, my personal best field watch is a Norqain Neverest (Zermatt special edition). OK, by your definitions it is not a field watch as it has a rotating bezel and a "glacier" looking dial, but it certainly looks, feels and wears like a true field watch.

    @fredericperrin3279@fredericperrin32792 ай бұрын
    • Thanks - I just ignore my family and nerd on watches in stead 😂😂 As for Norqain, I have to dive into them at some point. I'm seeing more and more of them and have stopped at the counter often, but never taken one out of the case... On the to do 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
    • @@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch Great, thanks for the reply. I would love to have your enlighted view of the Norquain brand.

      @fredericperrin3279@fredericperrin32792 ай бұрын
  • Nice video - Thanks👍🏻

    @gerryshields4722@gerryshields47222 ай бұрын
  • Great discussion. And nice idea adding the 5226 here actually. That was an inspired choice. Saw your video as I’m on the market for a field watch. Even if it doesn’t have an inhouse movement, heavily considering the vertex (rich dirty dozen history) M100A. Modern interpretation but still has a very tool vibe to it. Theres something about it having a railroad track and subseconds that makes it have an elegant tool vibe to it. Costs as much as a Ranger though, but hey, we buy what we like eh?

    @epvtrinidad@epvtrinidadАй бұрын
    • Exactomundo 😊

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatchАй бұрын
  • I love what you do, first time watching surprisingly, your content is exactly what my brain enjoys. Thank you! Right now I have my 42mm citizen pro-master gmt as my real field watch… but my 36mm nomos club 701 is my other field piece. I think you’re right. If it was all brushed it might get more field time… however its size makes it a better candidate depending on the activity. To some up I think the fact that it costs close to seven times the amount of the citizen makes me opt out of wearing it in the most rocky of situations.

    @benjamindinunzio8687@benjamindinunzio86872 ай бұрын
  • My one and only "Field Watch" is the, as you noted in the video, the disqualified "Murph 38". I love it because it's "cleaner" than the base Khaki, but because of the beautiful brushed case, I won't let it become a beater - I love the clean brushing - which defeats the whole purpose! 😂

    @wowlsj@wowlsj2 ай бұрын
  • My favourite field watch in your comparison is the Tudor Ranger. It's the cleanest looking and is totally what the Rolex Explorer lost when it swapped out the printed numerals on the 1016 for the applied white gold. The Sinn 556 with the oversized numerals is also one of my favourite field watches for about half the money of the Tudor.

    @wambugumassive@wambugumassive20 күн бұрын
  • I have a Hamilton Khaki Field Titanium Auto 38m that I really love. The stock strap is a very delicate nubuck that is not meant to touch water, but I use it with pass-through straps for great versatility. I do use it while traveling for work where I might be outdoors on an excursion with a zulu strap, but also in a classroom or at a dinner meeting with a shell cordovan single-pass, so I want something that looks good, is understated, and doesn't draw attention to itself while holding up to the elements. A dive watch would also probably serve these functions well, but then also be flashier which I don't like when traveling. A digital watch could also work, but then less classy imo. A classy field watch is a unique sweet spot that is a difficult mark to hit, but I think it's a very special one.

    @cesar314@cesar314Ай бұрын
  • Thank you for making great content. I thoroughly enjoy every second of your videos, your calm and collected thoughts and even your voice is ASMR! In a world which is getting more and more divisive and where open discourse seems to be all to uncommon, it's nice that even though I may not always agree with your ideas, I am more than happy to hear them, and more likely than not to be persuaded by them. By the way, being swedish and not having english as a mother tongue I am having a hard time distinguishing where you are from. Is it Australia, New Zeeland, England or maybe even South Africa? Literally no idea. Would be cool to know. Looking forward to your next video, as always.

    @jesperjohansson7062@jesperjohansson70622 ай бұрын
    • Thanks - Yes. I try to share my thoughts. I don't profess to be "right" - I just enjoy the process and happy that others find value in watching agree or disagree. Nobody got smarter by listening to people that had the exact same views as their own. 😃😃 And yes - South Africa 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • I'm new to this channel, and I absolutely love the way you present so much information, so clearly. Subscribed. Also: I LOVE your burger analogy. I've had Daniel Boulud's foie gras burger. It was delicious and unique and arguably worth the $125 price tag... but it was definitely not a burger. There are elevated, fancy burgers that you definitely pay a price premium for... but that was not it. It crossed a line that I'm not sure I could easily define, but it definitely crossed it nonetheless.

    @ghjong001@ghjong0012 ай бұрын
    • Thanks - welcome aboard. As for the burger. I do agree - there is something about those luxury interpretations, but the basic burger is just so perfect in it's base form 😃😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • This is such a great video and I really appreciate your point of view on this topic. Makes so much sense. For field watch, previously had a Hamilton Khaki 44mm, but it was just too big. Currently have a Hamilton Murph 38mm...has such a great vintage vibe and has all of those elements you described that make up a great field/tool watch. But I have to say....the Tudor Ranger....hmmm. 🙂

    @bradherndon8032@bradherndon8032Ай бұрын
    • Glad you enjoyed it! 😀

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatchАй бұрын
  • I think field watches and pilots watches are my favourite watch category. When I think of field watches, I do think of the watches you have mentioned, as well as the Sinn556 and the Tudor North Flag which I think is discontinued? Loved your burger analogy too.

    @gwobcke@gwobcke2 ай бұрын
  • Really good video, thanks! I love that Patek, talk about stealth wealth. I have the Ranger, I love the simplicity over it, I wanna get the new Zenith pilot, same there, simple, and the ultimate simple watch for me would be the 5226, its just incredible looking, I know I will probably never have one but thats ok, I still love my simple Ranger to death. Thanks again, incredible video.

    @johannoren2787@johannoren27872 ай бұрын
  • Nice take on the tool watch world. As an owner of a 5226g I appreciate the brand's option of a tool like watch. I think Patek successfully bridged that tool luxury divide. And that dial.....

    @michaelbrooks1061@michaelbrooks10612 ай бұрын
    • That dial. Exactly 😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • My Khaki field mech in black PVD has been my working partner(law enforcement) for about two years now. Love the simple legible design. Sure a g-shock would do the job but the feel would be very different.

    @IntegraAEM@IntegraAEM2 ай бұрын
  • Great content!

    @oscarmagnusson3193@oscarmagnusson31932 ай бұрын
    • Thanks 😃😃

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • Mike just talked me into wanting a field watch

    @DogStar84@DogStar842 ай бұрын
    • lol 😂

      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch2 ай бұрын
  • I have the Hamilton khaki expedition. I like the 37mm size, i like the compass bezel. What do you thing of it? Good content. Thanks 😊

    @paulyoung4392@paulyoung43922 ай бұрын
  • Excelent video, very refreshing with a point and analitic that I as well usually using when choosing a next watch. I understand comparisont of brands put in the video for audience general understanding of the comoun models and I realy love both my Hamiltons, Khaki quartz that I took specificaly because of it function as well as i love my Hamilton Railroad with the idea behind it and way it was build. Nevertheless, regarding last question, the ones i choose (depending on a region i am in since i have small colections on two places) would be, my first automatic watch from my time of secondary school (i am around 40 now) Seiko SNK and for the second region Vostok Komandirski (we, group of friends have it as boys clubs choices that we had gifted to eachother and wear it when going to joined travel).

    @tihov217@tihov217Ай бұрын
  • My favorite "field watch" is my Timefactors Speedbird III although it really qualifies as a pilots watch too.

    @joshuabriggs7114@joshuabriggs71142 ай бұрын
  • Hi! I would toss my Omega Railmaster with its charcoal dial in the ring. IMHO the Railmaster is an understated luxury tool watch. The 3, 6, 9 and 12 non applied numerals and the cross hair give it its field watch vibes. The case and bracelet is all brushed and the crown has got a decent size. Best wishes, Claus

    @Claus-L.Mueller@Claus-L.Mueller2 ай бұрын
  • Great analysis! Thank you! I love all of those and I’d agree that the Patek and Rolex screams luxury purely by brand name. The others are at least achievable with some discipline to save up for. But Rolex and Patek you can’t just walk into a store and purchase, which for me is the luxury experience that those buyers want, exclusivity.

    @VMIyanks04@VMIyanks0428 күн бұрын
  • I had to pick up a spare watch whilst my Certena DS was being overhauled. I picked up a basic, used Lorus 100m field watch which is a Seiko brand. Stick it on a NATO strap and it is the one I wear for rough use. As a plus, the date/day is dual language English/French.

    @michaelw2288@michaelw2288Ай бұрын
  • Great video. Id be interested on your take of the Vertex M100A. Although more expensive than your average Hamilton. It has an element of history being related to the original Dirty Dozen but fulfils a lot of the criteria of a Field watch........ at a price.🤔

    @philbaynes3125@philbaynes31252 ай бұрын
  • I don't really like that much field and pilots watches. but. I do own a field watch and I love it. It's a microbrands field watch and it's probably one of maybe few field watches that u would love to own and wear regularly. My divers get more wrist time though and even my sports watches... I agree that a proper field watch is a tool watch and I believe that sometimes tool is very close to stool...😊

    @panospeter_pan4257@panospeter_pan42572 ай бұрын
  • The function I find most important in a field watch is luminosity that lasts all night, I was an infantry scout and spent many nights on patrol. The cheap Timex field watches I wore at the time barely made it to first light. My favorite working watch was a gift from my mother-in-law, a Tissot PR100 Titanium. It's luminous marks are easily read on the longest nights without the preparation of holding the dial to a flashlight. I wear it every day, but it excels as my camping watch.

    @jfu5222@jfu5222Ай бұрын
  • One of the things I always loved about Steinhart Watches was the “field watch” vibe. I own the GMT which I’m sure was created for people who cant or wont afford a Rolex Explorer II. It is my weekend watch! My beater. The one I never worry about. All painted markers. 300M of water resistance. Completely brushed. All for less than $600 USD. I know a lot of people hate the brand because they knockoff other designs. But I love the only Steinhart I own…because its truly go anywhere do anything for the weekend beater. And with that said…it’s the weekend. See ya.

    @Hard_7_Iron@Hard_7_Iron2 ай бұрын
    • I have their take on the original Exp II too - and love it. If Rolex would reissue it and sell it to us mortals, I’d buy theirs and give the Steinhart to a young personas his gateway watch (still on the list for the 226570 polar - the downside of living in a metropolis).

      @WestCoastAce27@WestCoastAce272 ай бұрын
KZhead