American reacts to The European Union - Summary on a Map

2024 ж. 16 Мам.
346 353 Рет қаралды

Thank you for watching me, a humble American, react to The European Union - Summary on a Map
Original video: • The European Union - S...
Got a video request? Fill out this form!
forms.gle/NeQp2oN5gzxpxXLx8
Thanks for subscribing for more European reactions!

Пікірлер
  • I felt the tension in the room while you looked to see if the UK uses the euro 😂. UK has never used the euro, always been the pound / sterling. (jokey remark from me only, I wasn't being angry, good video!)

    @user-wf3lr1gj7o@user-wf3lr1gj7o6 ай бұрын
    • Maybe he thought they also excepted euro, because in Poland they except the euro even though their currency is zloty.

      @JackSucksAtCIips@JackSucksAtCIips6 ай бұрын
    • it is clear to see - that most monarchies had some sentimentality towards their royal currency. - thats basically it. Rest of us gave a shit. I am quite happy with the euro.

      @zoolkhan@zoolkhan6 ай бұрын
    • @@zoolkhan I am pretty sure that the UK wanted to stay with the pound because it was economically better for them, not because of sentimentality. The pound has always been a strong currency.

      @skiamach6208@skiamach62086 ай бұрын
    • They couldn't change guinea pigs to euro pigs.

      @edonveil9887@edonveil98876 ай бұрын
    • @@zoolkhan Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain are monarchies and joined the euro from the beginning. It's a question of convenience, not sentimentality

      @Maria-js9ou@Maria-js9ou6 ай бұрын
  • Ryan, you are not ignorant. Compared to lots of your country mates you are trying to get an overview over the world, the connections and the cultures. So I cannot call you ignorant. Maybe "unknowing" but not in the sense of being ignorant. You make an effort to understand the world outside the US and nobody can expect more!

    @Herzschreiber@Herzschreiber6 ай бұрын
    • Dumb isn't bad, because one can always learn new things. The real bad thing is ignorance. Knowing there are other ideas and possibilities and simply not care enough is bad.

      @Kivas_Fajo@Kivas_Fajo6 ай бұрын
    • For real, he's waaaayyy above average the american level 😂

      @TheGabrielPT@TheGabrielPT6 ай бұрын
    • @@TheGabrielPT Can't tell. Don't know any Americans privately, and if I did, they would be Americans that left the U.S. for a better life in Europe, so they are not particularly the role model American.

      @Kivas_Fajo@Kivas_Fajo6 ай бұрын
    • @@Kivas_FajoIt is Fascinating how many people have trouble with the meaning of words like "ignorant" and "dumb". "Ignorant" means uninformed, or as someone else puts it, "unknowing". "Dumb" means stupid. Neither one means unwilling to learn, though you might call that "intentionally ignorant".

      @KaiHenningsen@KaiHenningsen6 ай бұрын
    • @@KaiHenningsen In German it means what I said...and because English is also a West Germanic language I thought it meant the same there. It doesn't. TIL. Thx PS: Then according to your logic to ignore someone means what?

      @Kivas_Fajo@Kivas_Fajo6 ай бұрын
  • In Spain there is a saying: "Ignorant is not the one who does not know, but the person who does not want to know".

    @kinnie6104@kinnie61044 ай бұрын
  • Just to clarify: the UK never adopted the Euro to begin with. They always used the pound. The EU is quite a beautiful clusterfuck of treaties and exemptions. GCPGrey has a very good and compact video explaining the difference between EU, Schengen, Eurozone, common economic area and associqted with the EU. As European that was quite interesting to watch and see what can be thought of as common knowledge about Europe in the US.

    @user-wb9cd2lg2s@user-wb9cd2lg2s6 ай бұрын
    • Yeah and next to the EU you also have the Council of Europe, which makes it even more confusing! I think we have like 3 councils that sound extremely similar; I think the Council of Europe (which has the European Council of Human Rights as a court), the Council of the EU and the European Council.

      @larissaswinkels3661@larissaswinkels36616 ай бұрын
    • Also you technically DO NOT need to be in the EU to adopt the euro. So eu membership and euro adoption are 2 different things

      @Valentin-oc5nh@Valentin-oc5nh4 ай бұрын
    • ​@@Valentin-oc5nhyes and no. Indeed non EU countries can adopt the Euro as it's currency as well as any other, but they won't have any controll over the monetary polucy and won't be able to mint their own Euro coins. One exception to this is actually Vatican city, which technically is not part of EU but has permisson to mint limited number of uniqe Euro coins.

      @mancubwwa@mancubwwa4 ай бұрын
    • ​@mancubwwa So has Monaco. San Marino, Andorra, Montenegro and Lichtenstein use it too

      @richardmoloney689@richardmoloney6894 ай бұрын
    • @@richardmoloney689 no, Lichtenstein uses swiss frank

      @mancubwwa@mancubwwa4 ай бұрын
  • Although Switzerland, Norway and Iceland are not member states of the EU, they are still members of the Schengen treaty, so basically there is no boarder controls between all these countries (at least under normal circumstances)

    @Tim_OWL@Tim_OWL6 ай бұрын
    • They are also members of the European Economic Area.

      @gerardflynn7382@gerardflynn73826 ай бұрын
    • At least at the border between Germany and Switzerland in Rheinfelden there are controls - even under normal circumstances.

      @e.s.7272@e.s.72726 ай бұрын
    • @@e.s.7272 these are customs controls, aren’t they?

      @Tim_OWL@Tim_OWL6 ай бұрын
    • @@gerardflynn7382 Norway and Iceland are members of the EEA (together with Lichtenstein) but Switzerland is not a member. There was a moment where they considered it but it was short and was strongly objected to by the citizens and many politicians. Switzerland has a series of specific agreements that allow some things, like freedom of movement, and strong economic relations and agreements but they are not a member of any group. The EEA is the closest you can be to the EU without being an official member, as they are bound by most of the laws and rules but they have no influence on them. The reason for not wanting to be a full member is to keep some independence in things that are more important to the, like fishing areas when it comes to Norway or Iceland (it is a very important industry, with a long heritage and as a member they would have to allow other members to fish there and they will have restrictions on quantities). With Switzerland it's was their neutrality and, on the economic side, their banking system.

      @AL5520@AL55206 ай бұрын
    • And thus have to fund the EUSSR and follow rules/laws

      @Salfordian@Salfordian6 ай бұрын
  • Your comment about how all these countries came together in spite of different languages is spot on (at 10.50 or so). Take it a step further. For two THOUSAND years, these people had spent more time fighting, killing, and exploiting each other than working together. France came out of WWII saying never again, and reached out to one of their biggest rivals. It's a testament to what cooperation can do.

    @jasonlouis697@jasonlouis6976 ай бұрын
    • The fact the De Gaulle has a profund distate for the UK and the USA helped a lot, this man basicaly ran on spite ^^.

      @gaetanhillion8342@gaetanhillion83426 ай бұрын
    • @@gaetanhillion8342 De Gaulle essentially didn't believe that the UK was compatible with the European project, and on that he was 100% correct, as proven by the events of 2016 and the Brexit aftermath. The UK joined the ECC in 1971 purely out of economic interest; the British population at large felt no particular afinity with continental Europe, and it does not feel any to this day. As soon as the UK felt that it isn't getting any economic benefits anymore, it wished to to exit the project, and so it did. De Gaulle was proven right.

      @alexverdigris9939@alexverdigris99396 ай бұрын
    • ​@@alexverdigris9939I believe the UK can be a valuable member, but they have to some extent a similar issue as Russia. It is their colonial past and existence of commonwealth. Obviously it is difficult for a formal world superpower to swallow their pride. You must take into consideration how much the UK has changed since WW 2. I believe that the UK will return to the EU. Not now, nor soon, but once, they do.

      6 ай бұрын
    • @ You are right in noting the colonial past and the commonwealth, but I think you miss the point slightly. Many Brits feel a debt of honour towards the commonwealth nations, for coming to Britain's aid in the world wars. Any idea of preferential treatment being offered to the EU, rather than these closer(culturally) nations, has always been resisted. It's about pride, sure, but not in the way you suggest. To maintian pride, one must have honour.

      @Dan-fp2nu@Dan-fp2nu6 ай бұрын
    • @ The EU will fall apart sooner

      @ivanf.7867@ivanf.78676 ай бұрын
  • What they left out is 3 of the 6 original countries already had formed an alliance still DURING WW2, the BeNeLux. The three small countries in the north-West of Europe (Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg) made a pact of free transport of goods in 1944. This was already the start of alliances in Europe

    @littleDutchie92@littleDutchie926 ай бұрын
    • even earlier. Germany was born out of the ambition to abolish customs between their regions. :) see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zollverein

      @user-yh5dk7cv5u@user-yh5dk7cv5u5 ай бұрын
    • I never realised, that BeNeLux are starting letters of the 3 countries who formed it. Thank you for that. :D

      @Wolfarior@Wolfarior4 ай бұрын
  • I heard that France also vetoed the UK's membership because they felt that the UK didn't really understand the spirit of the European community and the peace keeping aspect of it but were only interested in the trade. And this has been proven true in later years. We can see it in how British politicians talk about Europe and the EU.

    @lukaszepesi@lukaszepesi6 ай бұрын
    • Yes, we've known they were a pain in the backside since the end of the roman empire. They left because the EU was tired of giving them exceptions to EU rules and said they'd get a better deal with the US and South Korea, the EU squeezed them for all they were worth in the leaving negotiations, knowing they'd wither away without a deal with us, France took their fish when they left too by keeping the fishing rights in the overlapping territorial waters despite them no longer being EU territory.

      @Soken50@Soken505 ай бұрын
    • Well UK was kinda punished when they were leaving as warning to others, sure you can leave but it's not cheap. Its also confirmed UK was bamboozled by russian propaganda into leaving EU, because UK has American mindset and values they were very easily brainwashed as all it required was playing on their emotions, they tried and still do try same with other EU members especially Baltic countries and Poland is constantly attacked by russian propaganda and there is a lot of paid shills acting on behalf of russia but luckily it doesn't get any traction.

      @wykydytron@wykydytron5 ай бұрын
    • The alternative opinion is that the UK really did understand the spirit of the European community, and rejected if for that reason.

      @robheyes6470@robheyes64705 ай бұрын
    • in this aspect, the British were right, because the EU is now a communist-socialist dictatorship that interferes with how people in a given country want to live and interferes in intimate and religious matters, and the EU promotes harmful ideologies. Today there is less freedom in the EU than in the USA which is one country and the EU is not a country and I hope it never will be!

      @adlervonschlesien4869@adlervonschlesien48695 ай бұрын
    • @@robheyes6470 That's patently false, they asked to join when they saw how successful the trading union and agricultural policies were then systematically asked for exceptions to every subsequent rule until Europe got fed up and stopped listening to their whining, after which the UK tried to bargain with their membership to ask for more, to which all of Europe said "Good riddance and good luck negotiating a better deal outside the EU" and France said "Goodbye and thanks for all the fish"

      @Soken50@Soken505 ай бұрын
  • For me as a French, it seems normal but when you take a step back, you realise it's quite mad how so many countries succeeded to get (almost) along. And the weird things that it implies, like i bought my car in Germany with money from an account i have in Lithuania and it normal to me.

    @PanamaRedEyes@PanamaRedEyes6 ай бұрын
    • Yeah. Particularly for you Lithuanians none of this should be considered normal. Not too long ago you were stuck behind the iron curtain (from a central European's point of view). The changes you went through in such a short time were HUGE! Don't take this for granted 😉

      @a5cent@a5cent6 ай бұрын
    • revolut?

      @valentinszabo4331@valentinszabo43316 ай бұрын
    • Maastricht treaty was a huge arnack, plus the Euro is an arnack too. Plus the assumption that it's value is the same everywhere in Europe, which was the only argument in it's favor, is false. Just take a look at Spain lol. The Franc (for us in France) was wayyy cheaper, and so was life (well now it's even worst with Ukraine and this shrinkflation thing). Plus the Germans are doing lobbyism on energies and gas, great...

      @AtreidesIV@AtreidesIV6 ай бұрын
    • this@@valentinszabo4331

      @TrixityMcLight@TrixityMcLight6 ай бұрын
    • For my summer holiday, I passed through/visited nine countries, used one currency and was checked at a grand total of zero borders. It has its advantages for sure.

      @Beggar42@Beggar426 ай бұрын
  • When I recently spent my holidays in Malta, I went to the reception one morning with a 5€ bill and asked the head lady in charge if she could change the bill into a whole set of Maltese coins (3,86€) and the rest into whatever she had in stock. Now I don't know if she was American or Canadian, but she definitely - to my utter surprise - had a North American accent. She looked at me twice in bewilderment, "Sir, you know you're still getting Euros, right?" I said, "I know, i know, that's why I'm here. I'm a collector and it's awfully hard to get a full set of Maltese coins outside of Malta in the regular cycle. Malta is only a small country and they don't issue that much." And then she looked more closely, "Oh, they all have different faces!". Then the great search began, even her colleague came to aid and they emptied every purse and wallet they had😅, very diligent. We actually managed to get together a halfway complete set, only the 5 and 10 Cents coins are missing. But I'll never forget her face when she realized I was talking about the same currency. 😅

    @thefurbeastunderyourbed5012@thefurbeastunderyourbed50124 ай бұрын
    • Hmm - maybe because you called it a 'bill' instead of a note. A bill here is a document indicating that you owe money and how much. For example we receive electricity bills, and when we're finished eating at a restaurant, we'd ask for the bill.

      @rorybrowne4973@rorybrowne49734 ай бұрын
    • @@rorybrowne4973 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_one-dollar_bill You're not wrong, but not quite right either. _Note_ has several meanings, so does _bill_ .

      @thefurbeastunderyourbed5012@thefurbeastunderyourbed50124 ай бұрын
    • @@thefurbeastunderyourbed5012 This was Malta. Not the United States.

      @rorybrowne4973@rorybrowne49734 ай бұрын
    • @@rorybrowne4973 Thanks for reminding me where I've been and who I talked to. Please read my initial post. I said the lady was Canadian or American, and it's not my fault if you know only one meaning for a word. In that sense...

      @thefurbeastunderyourbed5012@thefurbeastunderyourbed50124 ай бұрын
    • @@thefurbeastunderyourbed5012 Yes; I'm aware that in North America they calls currency notes "bills", and invoices issued by restaurants after eating there "checks". I have not noticed this terminology used in Malta, where I've lived for the past 2 years. I guess I missed the part about the person being "Canadian or American" ( in which case I'm assuming that by "American", you mean from the United States, since if you meant the whole of America from Canada down to Chile & Argentina, then the "Canadian or" part would be redundant. I'm not interested in arguing with you. If you're not interested in any insights I have from living in 4 English speaking countries in Europe (Malta, Gibraltar, UK, and Ireland), then fair enough.

      @rorybrowne4973@rorybrowne49734 ай бұрын
  • As a German this is what I am proud of for my people, after fighting two world wars we managed de reunite our country peacfully, without any shots fired. Ofo curse we are talking different generations, but still.

    @nadineblachetta3202@nadineblachetta32026 ай бұрын
    • Wam się udało? Jakby nie było biedy w Polsce i strajków robotników nic byście nie zrobili

      @jolantaj4928@jolantaj49283 ай бұрын
    • There have died many people on the way to reunification. It's called cold war.

      @mkolbat@mkolbat2 ай бұрын
    • Thank Gorbachev. He thought it would be a good idea to allow German unification to improve relations with the West. And look at it now. The USSR withdrew troops from Europe, but the United States only created new bases there. Russian are too forgiving and it harms them greatly. In Russia there is no family which did not lose family member in a war with Germany. 5 of my grandmothers siblings were taken to Germany and never returned. It is petty USSR did not annihilate Germany after the war. Germans did not pay for all the atrocities they done in USSR. Germans remember Holocaust but forget they killed Soviet citizens in concentration and working camps. And Germany did not pay for it. And now they again supply arms and weapons to their little nazi bitchies as they done in 1942. I hope Putin will forget he lived in Germany and gives an order to level German cities in retaliation.

      @yelenashishkina8804@yelenashishkina88042 ай бұрын
  • European and 46 here. It's really great that you want to widen your knowledge about the rest of the world, especially as an American - given the average of interest for it by your fellow countrymen. We should all try our best to widen our horizons in general. But tbh what moved me the most was when you said "my parents were alive for this...". Well, I was as well for a big part of it. I clearly remember what an incredible feeling it was when they opened the borders and we could start circulating freely among all European countries [it really lift many local border tensions too: I come from an Italian region at the border with Austria and the Schengen treaty really took away much fuel from the ongoing fire between the local different ethnic communities]. The EU also financed inter-univesity programs like Erasmus, which allowed us students to study a year abroad like it was at our own university. It was an incredible feeling of opening up to a wider future. It really saddens me to see the nationalistic, eurosceptic, small-minded drift that has taken the EU these last years.

    @queenofburggrafenamt5485@queenofburggrafenamt54854 ай бұрын
    • It's a sign of the decline of the European Renaissance. We are getting poorer in Europe as we have to share our wealth with the new memberstates...

      @Henk-007@Henk-0074 ай бұрын
    • @@Henk-007 That maybe true for the now but not in the future. Being small and confined leads to stagnation in markets and eventually your looking at the same problems of losing wealth as inflation increases anyway. At least with investment into new states we can diversify the markets and share new foods goods and most importantly decrease the opportunities of other unified nations from growing in competition with us rather than cooperation. Pro and cons to everything were all gonna be poor no matter what anyway in comparison to the people who are truly wealthy.

      @kylemenos@kylemenos3 ай бұрын
    • I totally feel you my European brother! I'm 40 and was born in the (back then) eastern block. The EU was the best that could happen for this continent. It's not perfect for sure but people really don't appreciate it enough. You can always find negatives but without seeing the positives it's just an unbalanced view. Where in the world do you have a better working political and economical system on such a scale with so many different countries, cultures and languages?

      @artxiom@artxiom2 ай бұрын
  • I think the video misses one of the points of why the European countries even started to union. It wasn't just for the sake of growing each other up, and "doing it for peace" is a vague statement. Sure, the European countries wanted to end the wars among them, but they also wanted to avoid becoming the war playground of the USA and USSR, and be able to keep their own sovereignty against the two superpowers. Which explains a lot of things like France vetoing the entry of UK, or the variations of acceptance of the Marshall plan or later NATO, challenging the American unilateral global leadership especially in early 2000s, the internal conflicts within the EU for individual sovereignty, ... We need to remind ourselves that the Hollywood idea of Allies or any alliance being best friends fighting hand in hand against the bad guys and only wishing good things to each other simply does not exist. That makes compelling stories, maybe, but that's just not real (even human relationships aren't really like that to begin with, so national conflicts?). Looking at countries relationships like a high school musical only makes people see them in the wrong way. From the moment one sees History as a story with bad guys and good guys, and placing "that's that country's best friend right there" and "that one bit my feeding hand, what an ungrateful brat", you're not in History anymore. You're in romantic gossiping at best, or manipulative alienation at worst. I don't say this video does that, but people tend to default to that very easily and I see it all the time, especially when they are told a very one-sided story about History. See more international relationships as compromises games.

    @WaddleQwacker@WaddleQwacker6 ай бұрын
    • Wow that's even for me as a German eye-opening, never seen it from that perspective. Thank you!

      @MrFreezeYo@MrFreezeYo6 ай бұрын
    • We’ll said Sir

      @patricialewis1464@patricialewis14646 ай бұрын
    • ....and did we suceed? I leave the answer to someone else . This has to be approached more in general - like who when how why ... The history will write it down maybe

      @valentinszabo4331@valentinszabo43316 ай бұрын
    • And now there's a mess in store.

      @topguydave@topguydave6 ай бұрын
    • Well that failed, anyway, France is an African/Muslim colony with American wokeness as UK or Germany. The game is over boys, you were weaklings and the future belongs to Africans and Asians.

      @companyofcules@companyofcules6 ай бұрын
  • Since 2020 when the video in the background was made Croatia entered the Schengen Area and adopted the Euro as its currency. Moldova, Ukraine and Bosnia and Herzegovina got EU candidate statuses without starting EU accession talks as well.

    @TheMercyBeat@TheMercyBeat6 ай бұрын
    • Moldova has the problem that a small part of the country in the east is occupied by Russia. They placed the 14th army and a puppet government to make sure their playground stays in line with the Kremlin.

      @JaakJacobus@JaakJacobus6 ай бұрын
    • Last time I looked Montenegro had proceeded furthest along the accession process though none of the candidate states are particularly close to joining.

      @donquixote3927@donquixote39276 ай бұрын
    • And Croatia's coins have Nicola Tesla on them (the 'norwegian gold' ones anyway) ... quite cool

      @Beggar42@Beggar426 ай бұрын
    • ​@@Beggar42They look so good

      @andresmartinezramos7513@andresmartinezramos75136 ай бұрын
    • ​​@@Beggar42 I'm glad you like our Nikola Tesla Eurocent coins! This genius was born and raised at the territory of nowadays Croatia so he's been given huge honour to end up on our Euro coins! Hello from Croatia

      @fapmashina1@fapmashina16 ай бұрын
  • De Gaulle said 'Non' three times before the UK was allowed to join the EEC. you've got to remember that before the European project the continent was almost constantly at war somewhere. The EU is as much a peace project as it is an economic trade pact.

    @patrickh8602@patrickh86026 ай бұрын
    • Good remark! Ever since the ECSC Treaty in 1952 not a single gunshot was fired in the member states, all the way to the present 27 EU members. The EU has stopped over a 1000 years of wars in Europe.

      @jaapruzius7976@jaapruzius79766 ай бұрын
    • The UK has continuously asked for special treatment and exceptions since it joined, to end up leaving for irrational reasons... I'm not a big fan of de Gaulle, but he was onto something at that time :D As for peace, it was a great preoccupation atter the two world wars, but I would have a hard time imagining the countries in the EU area fighting eachothers nowadays. Even without the EU.

      @IronFreee@IronFreee6 ай бұрын
    • @patrino That's not how you establish causality... I already agreed that the fear of war played a role in the initial idea of rapproaching European nations economically. That doesn't mean that there would have been any wars if the common market or the EU wasn't created. EU nations still have individual military programs and France, for example, have been pushing for more military autonomy since the end of WW2. There was an idea of a Franco-German EU army, but it never was achieved. The EU is not like the USA, European countries are close because they choose to be. There's nothing preventing them to be beliquious. There's stronger cultural ties between France and the UK than between France and Latvia who are both in the EU.

      @IronFreee@IronFreee6 ай бұрын
    • The civil war of Yugoslavia would not have been possible with Serbia and Croatia members of the EU. Even the war in Ukraine is unlikely in that way. The EU is a strategic shield for its members, as much as NATO is. Before the start of both World Wars, many citizens and leaders had a hard time imagining a war in Europe. The rest is.....

      @jaapruzius7976@jaapruzius79766 ай бұрын
    • @@jaapruzius7976 I have a hard time seing how the EU could have prevented the Yugoslavian civil war. That country, artificially holding together was just ready to explode, part of EU or not. If Ukraine was already part of the EU, it would have disuaded Putin to attack. But the perspective of such a thing would have immediately triggered a war before it could be done.

      @IronFreee@IronFreee6 ай бұрын
  • The thing with the Schengen area is really amazing. I remember as a child sitting in the car waiting in line to cross the boarder to Poland or Czechia (coming from Germany). But then in 2004 you could just go where ever you wanted, having just a bunch of signs on the road telling you, that you are leaving your country and entering the next. Btw. the UK never used the Euro. And countries like the Czech Republic don't use the Euro either, for they aren't part of the Euro zone.

    @biedl86@biedl866 ай бұрын
    • Oh yes, this is awesome! When I go from Germany to the UK, I pass the borders to the Netherlands, Belgium and France only seeing a sign "Bienvenu en France" and "Welkom to Nederland" but a don't even have to turn the cruise control down. Then I stand at the Eurotunnel checking in and there is a border official, and I don't understand why he is there and what he wants. Brexit was a really bad idea, people start to understand what they did to their wonderful country without a reason. So sad. And although I am really a democrat I oppose referendums because of this horrible experience.

      @UlliStein@UlliStein6 ай бұрын
    • @@UlliStein I can totally understand that. Democracy is awesome, but if people are just not informed at all when it comes to politics, then bad shit crazy can easily happen.

      @biedl86@biedl866 ай бұрын
    • @@biedl86 That's the problem! For every issue in life I pay for professional experts, when I'm ill I go to the doctor, when my car has a problem I go to a mechanic, but really important decisions I want to do myself? Why not let the people decide who should have the experience or at least the right consultants? Fun fact: In Switzerland there is a county that had women's right to vote not before the 1990's. Because only men were allowed to vote in the referendums :-D a vicious circle.

      @UlliStein@UlliStein6 ай бұрын
    • @@UlliStein What's also analogous to that is the US court system where you have a jury of non-experts deciding for justice. There, due to new scientific findings, the system has been adjusted. The jury is educated on how they can be biased before they can work as a juror, and certainly there will be more adjustments in the future for psychology and neuroscience are always progressing. But I think that the democratic system is much more delicate than that and that it will take much longer before we start implementing education as necessary, before people are allowed to vote. I mean, in Germany we are talking about allowing 16 years olds to vote now, which is actually the opposite direction.

      @biedl86@biedl866 ай бұрын
    • @@UlliStein "although I am really a democrat I oppose referendums because of this horrible experience". Mate this is a really dangerous statement and it is not very democratic. This looks like an "easy" answer to a problem, but I don't think is the right one. If people are ignorant you don't restrict their freedom or their democratic system to avoid damage, you find a way to ensure that the system can guarantee the correct education for everyone. I think this is one of the biggest problems we have today, people (and especially politicians) are too keen to take the "easy" route instead of the right, but more difficult one.

      @ZachSawyer2077@ZachSawyer20775 ай бұрын
  • It's interesting to hear Americans say they are 'going to Europe' on vacation when we Europeans don't consider ourselves to be culturally part of a 'United States of Europe', or one big block of united 'states', rather, a grouping of countries - all very unique and quite different.

    @flyingfeline7110@flyingfeline71106 ай бұрын
    • They never bothered to give their country a name. Just United States of America, like there is nothing else on the continent of North America

      @user-ni1hj2ht2g@user-ni1hj2ht2g6 ай бұрын
    • And sadly some people in the EU wants to actually make it to be the same as the usa, just in europe.....

      @tovarishcheleonora8542@tovarishcheleonora85426 ай бұрын
    • @@tovarishcheleonora8542that doesn’t seem like a good idea, I like the EU but I would not like the EU to become one big country 😔

      @papermangd@papermangd6 ай бұрын
    • That's how Europeans see themselves not acknowledging how similar they actually are. Once you travel the world, out of western and European culture, and not just for two weeks, then you'll understand that Europe as a whole is very, very similar, with nuances of course. Exception, and that is my personal feel & anecdote, are all former Soviet states. But even people from former Soviet states say that.

      @LETMino85@LETMino856 ай бұрын
    • @@papermangd Same. But sadly there are people who want it that way. Even some politicians too.

      @tovarishcheleonora8542@tovarishcheleonora85426 ай бұрын
  • Even during WWII the governments in exile of Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg agreed that, once free again, they would harmonize tax, tariffs, labor conditions, and more. By cooperation these 'three small ones' would become more powerful against their hostile 'big brothers', and thus the BeNeLux was born, blueprint for later EU treaties. You could say the founding fathers of the EU were France, (west) Germany, Benelux and Italy.

    @dutchman7623@dutchman76236 ай бұрын
    • Yeah, the Benelux was the real starting of the EU.

      @DJChappie001@DJChappie0016 ай бұрын
    • As a Spaniard born in the ‘80 I remember studying the BENELUX.

      @beltrangarrote1982@beltrangarrote19826 ай бұрын
    • As a french, I fully agree. Benelux was the true father of the EU, giving the idea to Robert Schumann to offer the french-german reconciliation through the creation of the steel-coal agreement, inviting the Benelux to share it. Italy joined asap as the 4th "father", it also wanted to erase the WW2 bad memory. It's since the beginning a "Peace" project, not a business project, something UK never understood, and that's the true reason De Gaulle vetoed UK in the project. Thatcher first showed De Gaulle was right, Brexit was a way for the british to endly recognise De Gaulle was right :-)

      @astree214@astree2146 ай бұрын
    • @@astree214 Honestly Britains foreigh policy when it came to Europa for god know how many years should have been a clear sign. They where afraid of the EU. Because the one thing it fears is a united Europa. They saw they couldnt stop it so might aswell try joining it.(tough one of the other main factors was the British Empire falling apart.)

      @mbos14@mbos146 ай бұрын
    • I don't really think Italy had that much if a role in that though. Benelux, France and Germany were more involved, even if Italy is also amongst the first few members.

      @xenotypos@xenotypos6 ай бұрын
  • 20:38 Croatia has joined recently both Schengen and Eurozone. I'm from Spain so perhaps I misinterpreted this on the news, but I'm quite sure it happened around last winter.

    @santividal9387@santividal93876 ай бұрын
    • You're absolutely right! Croatia really did join both Schengen area and Eurozone from the January 1st 2023. While much easier movement across the western and northern borders (with other EU neighbours) without border controls is something that is very cool, we're still getting used to Euro as the country's new official currency, prices will be shown both in Kuna - our old currency and Euro until the end of this year. But many of us are very satisfied with both changes and we do hope our eastern and southeastern neighbours (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo, North Macedonia and Albania) join the European Union as soon as possible likewise Ukraine, Moldavia and some others furthermore east. Warm greetings from Croatia to our European fellows in Spain

      @fapmashina1@fapmashina16 ай бұрын
    • @@fapmashina1 Yeah, I knew I was right! Thanks for your comment and congrats on this achievement. You'll get used to the euro soon, my father remembers when he changed between 'pesetas' and euro and he says it was overall for the best.

      @santividal9387@santividal93876 ай бұрын
  • Interesting thing about Euro coins is that the other side is always identical but on the other side countries have different designs. My grandpa would always check the change if there were coins from other countries and he would save them.

    @tepetti@tepetti6 ай бұрын
    • Banknotes are also interesting, but it costs more to save them!

      @rjbmarchiac8693@rjbmarchiac86935 ай бұрын
    • @@rjbmarchiac8693 Banknotes are the same in the whole Eurozone though.

      @blueeyedbaer@blueeyedbaer3 ай бұрын
  • Switzerland isn't in the EU but has ratified certain EU regulations that essentially allows it operate within the EU market like any EU member would.

    @TheKadanz@TheKadanz6 ай бұрын
    • Bankers.

      @samoht.p@samoht.p6 ай бұрын
    • Norway did as well. They are not a EU member, but they are on kind of an advanced partnership. Meaning Norway follows and uses many EU regulations, but on they other hand, when such regulations are made, there are at least consultations. So except for them not having the euro, they don't pay anything and don't get anything, but practically you don't notice them not being a member state visiting Norway.

      @alexanderkupke920@alexanderkupke9206 ай бұрын
    • Yeah Norway and Switzerland are more EU than Romania and Bulgaria lmao

      @arnaul_de_lapras5853@arnaul_de_lapras58536 ай бұрын
    • @@samoht.p Smart people, with loads of nazi gold in there vaults.

      @user-zu2dg1re3d@user-zu2dg1re3d6 ай бұрын
    • @@alexanderkupke920well that’s the thing tho… they do pay a membership fee while not having any actual say in how EU works (though they are consulted it isn’t a guarantee)

      @BB-hx4mj@BB-hx4mj6 ай бұрын
  • It would be interesting to watch you learn more about the fall of the USSR given your intrigue about how it happened without major war. Gorbachev was a huge factor in that I think, and the Velvet Revolution and the fall of the Berlin Wall were such seminal events that I think you'd find fascinating.

    @anonymouse8124@anonymouse81246 ай бұрын
    • What is major war for you? People were killed, it didnt happen peacefully

      @LU-jo2jz@LU-jo2jz6 ай бұрын
    • @@LU-jo2jz War is when armies of two states fight. That didn't happen in Czechoslovakia etc. There were only clashes between civilians and security forces loyal to the regime.

      @IQEGO@IQEGO6 ай бұрын
    • There was a major war in the former Jugoslavian states. It may have been a civil war or not, depending on how you define it, but a lot of people died there. And both US and russia had role in it.

      @user-jd2gi7dy5d@user-jd2gi7dy5d6 ай бұрын
    • ​@@IQEGOYes, it was civil wars, rebelions, democratic uprising etc.

      @Darwidx@Darwidx6 ай бұрын
    • ​@@user-jd2gi7dy5dand Yugoslavia wasn't part of the Warsaw pact. They are saying how the Warsaw pact/Soviet union collapsed whit out major war not Yugoslavia.

      @Maur0dm@Maur0dm6 ай бұрын
  • As a Swiss watching this video I was stunned that you didn’t know that Switzerland wasn’t part of the EU. Also that the UK never introduced the Euro and stayed with the Pound. Thumbs up in trying to educate the English speaking world how complicated and diverse Europe is. I enjoy watching your channel. Grew up in Canada but I have been living in Switzerland for the past 35 years now. My fascination of European politics, culture and history is limitless and find channels like yours educational. Keep it up 👍!

    @rehrbar@rehrbar4 ай бұрын
  • Just for completeness, Croatia joined the Schengen area on the 1st January 2023. Great video and also as a EU citizen there were several good reminders of key events that you simply forget with time. Quite frankly, how many remembered the Nice treaty? I didn't, and I live in Nice!!!

    @thibaultdepre4298@thibaultdepre42986 ай бұрын
  • Thanks, Ryan! It takes a relatively young American to remind 70-year old me, of how recent all this came about.

    @margreetanceaux3906@margreetanceaux39066 ай бұрын
  • 8:09 No. This was very good point not ignorance. The fact that so many nations gained their independence from Russia in the same time was a miracle that should be an international holiday and a universal Day of Freedom. It creates the last three decades of prosperity and global economic grouch that is unfortunately slowly ending.

    @Pawel_Mrozek@Pawel_Mrozek6 ай бұрын
  • Map at 06:36 includes the Faeroes in the EU which I don't think have ever been in the EU. Also the Channel Islands are shown as part of the EU and have never been. And Isle of Man.

    @MadTamB@MadTamB6 ай бұрын
  • You are underestimating the sheer size of some of the US states. EU: Area 4,233,262 square km Pop. 448,387,872 Density: 106 per square km US: Area 9,158,721 square km Pop. 335,073,176 Density: 37 per square km

    @stuckonautomatic@stuckonautomatic6 ай бұрын
  • There are 54 recognised European countries; 27 of which are members of the EU.

    @neuralwarp@neuralwarp6 ай бұрын
    • 52?? Only if you add the Balkans, the Caucassus and what else?

      @inigoromon1937@inigoromon19376 ай бұрын
    • @@inigoromon1937 "Only if"?! Why on earth would you even omit the Balkans and Caucasus? There's also Kazakhstan and Turkey.

      @yarzyn_5699@yarzyn_56996 ай бұрын
    • ​@@AlexGys9 That is independent nations, not countries. The UK, for example, consists of four countries. England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. The Kingdom of Denmark also consists of Denmark, the Faroe Islands, and Greenland. These are countries with their own governments, not just regions.

      @Thor.Jorgensen@Thor.Jorgensen6 ай бұрын
    • @@Thor.Jorgensenthis is really just semantics.

      @jeanpierreviergever1417@jeanpierreviergever14176 ай бұрын
    • @@jeanpierreviergever1417 I... don't think you know what semantics are. Try a thesaurus or dictionary.

      @Thor.Jorgensen@Thor.Jorgensen6 ай бұрын
  • Yes, the Euro officially started in 2002. I'm in my 30's and in my childhood and teenage eras, the DM (Deutsche Mark) was the currency in Germany. I remember the brand new shiny coins and every grocery store had both prices, Euro and Mark, to calculate how much money it was. Even today, elderlys like my grandparents always says things like "10 EUROS? THATS 20 LIKE MARK!"

    @monetigo@monetigo6 ай бұрын
    • Unfortunately, the old people didn't take the usual inflation into account in their Euro-DM comparison. 10 euros today have the same purchasing power as approximately 6.90 euros in 2001. And because 1 euro is equal to 1.95 German marks, 10 euros today would have a purchasing power of 13.34 German marks in 2001. So Grandpa would actually have to say: "10 euros? That's the same as 13.45 marks!!!"

      @jensputzlocher8345@jensputzlocher83456 ай бұрын
    • Remember those conversion calculators? EVERYONE just threw them at you. I had a drawer full of them!

      @Beggar42@Beggar426 ай бұрын
    • Euros and Mark have a 1:1 change because you German people think you are the ones in charge of everything in the union but you are nobody

      @supermat1797@supermat17975 ай бұрын
  • You're quite simply the only reaction video channel I enjoy, you're very entertaining!

    @CHALETARCADE@CHALETARCADE6 ай бұрын
  • The Shengen agreement is the best!, as a Spaniard I can travel wherever I want inside the shengen whithout the need of passport, it works with any type of transport, also is amazing how powerful is the Euro and it only exists since early 2000s.

    @juanmontull8550@juanmontull85506 ай бұрын
    • Of course the Euro is so powerful because so much economy is behind it. I will never forget the discussion in the early 2000's on German TV where a smart economy professor said: "When I fly into a turbulence I rather sit in a jumbo than in one of 20 Cessnas". That is the best metaphor I ever heard on that issue.

      @UlliStein@UlliStein6 ай бұрын
    • As a Czech I really want us to adopt the Euro... Love Spain btw, Madrid, Barcelona, Málaga, Granada, Palma de Mallorca all amazing places!

      @justADeni@justADeni4 ай бұрын
    • @@justADeni Yes that would be a great idea. Coming from Germany and visiting your wonderful country from time to time, I would love that!!

      @UlliStein@UlliStein4 ай бұрын
  • Lithuania had the bloodiest guerilla war in Europe's history trying to break out of the Soviet Union

    @richiss@richiss6 ай бұрын
  • In my life I experienced the German Reunion, the start of a new Millennium and the introduction of a new currency and unfortunately a world wide pandemic. At least 3 historic moments for sure.

    @hansmeiser32@hansmeiser326 ай бұрын
    • I am with you in that, just replacing the German Reunion by the end of the dictatorial regime that lasted for 50 years here in Portugal and ended in 1974, when I was still a child.

      @anacristinaribeiro9592@anacristinaribeiro95926 ай бұрын
    • Or to say it with a Witcher meme: "I lived through a whole dark age and three supposed end of days."

      @catonkybord7950@catonkybord79506 ай бұрын
  • Ignorant is the one who does not want to learn. Wish more americans did put this effort. Nice my dude. Cheers from Spain!

    @Baroncito86@Baroncito866 ай бұрын
    • I appreciate that many young Europeans speak English, but I'd advise you not to take lessons from Yoda in Star Wars.

      @emilydavison2053@emilydavison20534 ай бұрын
    • @@emilydavison2053 Oh, thanks for the young part. Advise from Joda I take because wise he is :D

      @Baroncito86@Baroncito864 ай бұрын
  • Continue, Ryan, that's pretty great, what you do. I need to admit many things I don't know about the USA, but this is the first step actually fighting prejudices. Love watching you since quite a while! Please carry on and all the best with your young family.

    @manuelkohlmann9109@manuelkohlmann91095 ай бұрын
  • It's crazy how little we are taught in the US about the outside world

    @asdfghjsdfgg1841@asdfghjsdfgg18416 ай бұрын
    • It's crazy how little we, EU citizens, are taught about the world outside of the EU ... or even our own little nations inside the EU. Pop quiz for all EU-citizens: name all of the 52 states of the USA. Or the 23 provinces of the People's Republic of China. Or, you know, list me all of the countries in Africa. Or, and that's putting us Europeans really to shame: name all of the 50+ European nations. Not the old names from before the USSR breakdown, but the current names. Conclusion: don't beat yourself up over a perceived lack of knowledge. We all suffer from the same type of ignorance.

      @bartrammeloo5046@bartrammeloo50466 ай бұрын
    • @@bartrammeloo5046 those are minute geographic details. Your examples are not that significant. I'm half american and partially grew up in Europe. At least where I lived, we were taught about history other than just the national (granted mostly national/european), political geography, two mandatory foreign language (english and some other), and just in general an openness to learn and explore other countries. Though there is no way to teach or even learn everything, schools should at least present a minimum of the world as to encourage curiousity and knowledge. Most of our knowledge doesn't come from school, but school is often a trigger for us to seek out that knowledge. Edit: your comment is a disservice to improving education in both the US and EU

      @asdfghjsdfgg1841@asdfghjsdfgg18416 ай бұрын
    • ​@@bartrammeloo5046 No. We don't. Feel free to speak for yourself only.

      @mbd6054@mbd60546 ай бұрын
    • @@bartrammeloo5046 Afaik US history and their member states was part of my Geography class at some point. But yeah, nothing about China. ;)

      @Fenster134@Fenster1345 ай бұрын
    • @@bartrammeloo5046 Usually it depends on people but i think in general EU people have a little better grasp of the world around them due to wars etc affecting them more. Can most Europeans name every US state or all African countries etc. Probably not. Is not easy to remember all that and only few geography lovers can do so which is probably the same in the US. BUT where the big difference exist is the level of the average knowledge. For example i see myself as an average European. I don't study geography etc that much really but i still know the basics. I know the countries in Europe. Can i point all of them in the map? Probably not but a good 85% to 90% i will get right. I also know major European cities and the countries the belong do. I will never think Madrid is in Austria or Paris is in Germany etc. Do i know every African nation? No i don't. But i know more than a dozen and i know all of them right under Europe and a few more on the map. The same with the US. Can i point every state? No. But i know which country is the USA on the map, i know they have 50 states, i know where Texas, California, Arizona, New York and few others are. I know Washington DC and Washington the state are different, i know they have three branches of government and are a democratic republic etc, i know Canada is above that has cities like Montreal, Quebec, Toronto etc. I know Mexico is under the US and most South American countries. I also know most Asian countries as well. I know where China or India or Pakistan or Mongolia or Korea and Japan and Iran and Afghanistan etc are. Can i name Chinese provenances? I admit not really(language doesn't make it easy as well). But i know their capital and a few major cities along with where Tibet is and Taiwan that they claim and we are having global political issues over etc. So as an average European i don't know everything in depth but i have a general view of the world around me. I will never be so ignorant as to think Vietnam is in Africa or that Somalia in in Oceania or something. It may not be great or detailed but a general view is there. So the question is how many average Americans are like this? I think less than Europeans. I am certain we both have our ignorant groups and the very well educated detail knowledgeable people but how many have a lets say basic general view of the world around them? I think that is where Europeans win. I think the percentage of Americans that have that view is less than the percentage of Europeans. Also in the completely ignorant groups i think US is slightly worse as well not only in percentage but on the level of ignorance. An fully ignorant worst case scenario European probably can't name most European countries let alone other continent countries etc but they will at least know where their own country is on the map and what their capital is. An ignorant American though can't even find the US on the map or knows what the capital is and how many states his/hers own country has.

      @SIPEROTH@SIPEROTH4 ай бұрын
  • The UK has never used the euro.

    @katiebouckley4300@katiebouckley43006 ай бұрын
    • Not as our legal currency but a few shops, especially in Londonstan, did accept it for a while as an addition to the Pound.

      @Thurgosh_OG@Thurgosh_OG6 ай бұрын
    • @@Thurgosh_OG but probably for the tourists right?

      @xrecix@xrecix6 ай бұрын
    • The UK will in the future, when it begs to return to the Eurozone.

      @murrayphillipson4830@murrayphillipson48306 ай бұрын
    • ​@@murrayphillipson4830 we have been worse off since leaving in my opinion 🙃

      @janolaful@janolaful6 ай бұрын
    • this video should be called damn American reacts to eeu

      @Kborodo740@Kborodo7406 ай бұрын
  • 7:57 ... a Yugoslav might disagree with you. 8:49 ... Before the Euro, there was the ECU (European Currency Unit), though it was only used in international transactions, and, aside from some novelty coins was never circulated among the wider public. 9:10 ... Switzerland primarily stayed out because joining would mean playing by the EU banking rules and they don't want that 11:01 ... the rule in EU departments is that the director choses either French or English as the common language of their department 17:36 ... pretty much all of the negotiation was the EU asking "what do you want?" and the UK screaming, "I DON'T KNOW!!!" 19:09 ... they don't use the pound NOW ... they've ALWAYS used the pound 15:56 ... On average EU countries are smaller than US states. Sure the big ones, France, Sweden, Spain, Poland, ... are Texas-size-ish, but you also have A whole bunch of countries that are Maine-sized or (a lot) smaller. 20:37 ... Croatia has integrated since this video was made. The border checkpoints are still there, but they're no longer staffed. You just drive through them

    @Beggar42@Beggar426 ай бұрын
  • You are all so well educated when it comes to European history!!! I am deeply impressed!!!!

    @Winona493@Winona4936 ай бұрын
    • We have had, free of charge, a 5 years crash course about the EU, it’s history, what it does, an education i.e. obscure technocratic acronyms engineered in Brussels, the Single Market, the Customs Union, courtesy of the British ! 😁

      @cyclistefroisse9267@cyclistefroisse92675 ай бұрын
  • You never stop learning, I love to watch what your learning as you teach me as well. keep it up. Love and peace from ireland.

    @daveologhlen@daveologhlen6 ай бұрын
  • The UK NEVER used the Euro. It is stated in the video when it reached around 2009 that (together with Denmark and Sweeden) they opted out. They have never given up the pound.

    @calinprodan4345@calinprodan43456 ай бұрын
    • The UK and Denmark got opt outs but Sweden didn't. Sweden actually is obliged to to join the Eurozone when it meets all the Maastricht criteria. Which it doesn't meet on purpose because Swedes don't want the Euro. However, that's changing slowly, as Swedish crown got weaker and weaker during last 10 years, and many people start to see advantages of the Euro.

      @blueeyedbaer@blueeyedbaer3 ай бұрын
    • Yes when I lived between Belfast and Donegal I carried two coin purses, one had euros and one had pounds 😂💶💷

      @erinnadia0409@erinnadia04093 ай бұрын
  • PS: In Europe we have countries NOT states, you just use the word state when it's referring to the EU but don't forget that evry country in the EU is INDEPENDENT.

    @87leafar@87leafar6 ай бұрын
  • I… I’ve watched several videos of yours and sometimes though “lol ur american”, but… as a European watching this along with you, I didn’t know a lot of it either, lol. Kind of happy you said the questions and answers out loud so I didn’t have to, hah.

    @ohrusty@ohrusty6 ай бұрын
  • UK, Denmark and Sweden uses their own coins

    @LynxLord1991@LynxLord19916 ай бұрын
    • And Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Romania.

      @andyt8216@andyt82166 ай бұрын
    • Poland also still uses their own currency, altho they apparently have a timeline for when they need to start using the Euro.

      @stupidtookmynick@stupidtookmynick6 ай бұрын
    • but they are all tied to the Euro

      @nettcologne9186@nettcologne91866 ай бұрын
    • The Danish krone is pegged to the euro. The Swedish krona is free-floating.

      @u.s.navy_pete4111@u.s.navy_pete41116 ай бұрын
    • @@nettcologne9186 not true.

      @andyt8216@andyt82166 ай бұрын
  • Many major corporations run their European business from Ireland. It's completely normal for me to see something like "Google Ireland" on my bank statements.

    @DaGuys470@DaGuys4706 ай бұрын
    • Amazon's European HQ is in Dublin, Ireland, specifically for tax reasons.

      @Thurgosh_OG@Thurgosh_OG6 ай бұрын
  • UK founded the rivaling European trade bloc (European Free Trade Association (known as the "outer seven")) in 1960 with Austria, Denmark, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and Switzerland.

    @finnishculturalchannel@finnishculturalchannel6 ай бұрын
  • USA - 9 800 000 km2 EU - 4 200 000 km2 Watch something about Mercator maps. Its fascinating. World looks quite different than you think.

    @CorAngar20@CorAngar206 ай бұрын
  • USSR not controlled, but occupied that many countries. Baltic nations included, as they were independent during Interwar Era. Declared goal of WWII was to liberate Europe, but as USSR was on "good guys" side, they were let to occupy half of Europe. Everyone forgets that conflict started when National Socialist Germany attacked Poland from the West, but they were not alone, USSR attacked Poland from the East. Why no one condemned USSR? Why no one declared war on USSR? Victorious write the History, while vanquished suffer.

    @liveforever141@liveforever1416 ай бұрын
    • If there was no USSR you would be speaking german today

      @tilenoblak7304@tilenoblak73046 ай бұрын
    • @@tilenoblak7304 there was USSR in its place, and I had to learn Russian. Survived. If there was Germany, I would have to learn german instead of russian, what a "big" deal.

      @liveforever141@liveforever1416 ай бұрын
    • @@tilenoblak7304 If there was no USSR, Hitler wouldn't have risen to power as he was playing on peoples fears of bolshevism (and antisemitism, ofc)

      @Brazauskas123@Brazauskas1236 ай бұрын
    • @@liveforever141 Not only would you speak a different language the world you would live in would literally be different the world order wouldn’t be the aame as today. Look i get it you were part of russia by force. Im from a country that was under a different country for 400 years and then 70 under a different country so i get it I really do. But there is no denying that the USSR saved Europe, like them or not🤷🏻‍♂️

      @tilenoblak7304@tilenoblak73046 ай бұрын
    • @@liveforever141 Due to leaks of British diplomatic documents USSR invaded Poland after the deal between UK and Poland allowing USSR to take better strategic position towards Germany for the incoming war. On 17 September 1939 Polish Army recieved orders from its high command TO ALLOW SOVIETS TO ADVANCE as fast as possible.

      @Northerner-NotADoctor@Northerner-NotADoctor6 ай бұрын
  • You're learning Ryan. That's never ignorant. In fact in many cases you are aware of the gaps in your knowledge. That's a major step up towards more knowledge! And, yes, some of the things you blurt out sound, at least to my aging European ears, ridiculously 'typical American' and make me laugh or roll my eyes. But mosty you follow those up by questioning yourself and finding out more. And that is not ignorant at all. Keep it up! I enjoy your videos!

    @rmyikzelf5604@rmyikzelf56046 ай бұрын
    • That you should know in your age from school 🙂

      @drakulkacz6489@drakulkacz64896 ай бұрын
    • @@drakulkacz6489 Americans are like kindergarten kids. Be nice.

      @rmyikzelf5604@rmyikzelf56046 ай бұрын
  • This one was weird. It had a lot of info, but at the same time glossed over a lot of important bits. Like how the initial treaties were specifically focused on creating an interconnected economic zone to make war between European countries unprofitable. That many bordering countries have treaties making them basically de facto members, at least by most metrics, but without having representation in EU parliament. Eurozone was also kinda glossed over. But overall a nice summary.

    @myhvKun@myhvKun6 ай бұрын
  • The Euro area, Schengen area, EU and European court of justice area are all different areas that overlap at times. Some small countries like Switzerland or Iceland are part of the Schengen area and thus accept almost all EU rules without being EU members. They would say that their voices would be small in the EU and it allows them to prevent the introduction of some specific EU laws (whaling in the case of Iceland, banking in the case of Switzerland). The biggest advantage of being part of the EU is not the money you get back directly but your access to a huge market, worth billions every month for bigger economies.

    @peterl5804@peterl58044 ай бұрын
  • Switzerland is never part of the EU but they are part Schengen area. Switzerland is the member of EFTA(European Free Trade Agreement) and other members are Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.

    @stephaniechbakingtraveler4262@stephaniechbakingtraveler42626 ай бұрын
    • Yea... Originally Iceland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Switzerland, Liechtenstain and Austria paired together becasue Americans think they are all clustered in one place. So why not have a trade agreement

      @matsv201@matsv2016 ай бұрын
    • i agree with you @@matsv201

      @stephaniechbakingtraveler4262@stephaniechbakingtraveler42626 ай бұрын
    • @@matsv201 Portugal and the UK were part of it as well (both founding members)

      @baumgrt@baumgrt6 ай бұрын
  • I absolutely love Schengen. There's nothing makes me happier than the sight of a closed and boarded up customs post. :)

    @cr10001@cr100016 ай бұрын
    • Schengen and the euro define freedom for me

      @new44new@new44new6 ай бұрын
    • Schengen is the main goal for which Bulgaria's weird government in unstable coalition was formed this year 😅 I remember a few years back when the train from Germany just arrived in Austria without stopping! My mind was blown away😄

      @geryddle@geryddle6 ай бұрын
    • @@geryddle Hopefully that government keeps going for a while, since Austria and Netherlands still blocking their Schengen entry. I travelled via train from Romania to Hungary a few weeks ago and the Schengen border was pretty interesting, needed some patience. We central Eupeans aren't used to border controls anymore.

      @Fenster134@Fenster1345 ай бұрын
    • Fine until the bad guys turn up at the border.

      @user-ky6vw5up9m@user-ky6vw5up9m4 ай бұрын
    • I absolutely hate Schengen😏

      @brittadueandersen2519@brittadueandersen2519Ай бұрын
  • The Uk never adopted the Euro, however after saying that before Brexit, in towns and parts of London (not sure about other cities) where tourism is high alot of small shops and some cab drivers would accept the euro in exchange for goods/services (at a slight mark up)

    @chrismcgarry3793@chrismcgarry37933 ай бұрын
  • Life goes fast...do the adventures you need ...while you are fit to experience them fully! ❤

    @margiegurner2694@margiegurner2694Ай бұрын
  • You know what I really admire is the fact that you’re actually broadening your historic knowledge. This base is the building block required to stack on future knowledge and understanding. It’s fascinating to check out your reactions as you pretty much present as the “average guy” and associated insights - as well as an amusing sense of humor. Best greetings from Northern Germany 😊

    @DailyDamage@DailyDamage6 ай бұрын
  • just so you know, the UK never used the EURO, always used british pounds even when they were in the EU

    @michelegug9847@michelegug98476 ай бұрын
    • the UK never really were in the EU and now they didn't really leave the EU ; what do we have to do to really get rid of you and to be free again?

      @BenelliMr@BenelliMr6 ай бұрын
    • @19:09 You can even see their currency is the oldest still accepted legal tender (instead of for its material/sentimental/intellectual value). It's not quite clear, but it may have arisen as early as the late 8th century, which is more than 122 decades ago, therefore almost 56 times older than the Euro is now.

      @whohan779@whohan7796 ай бұрын
    • @@BenelliMr Really now? So a country that tried to get in several times, got in, obeyed most EU legislation, paid some of the highest amounts of money into the EU annually and had to invoke an EU member specific piece of legislation to cease those payments and gain the ability to revoke those EU legislations. Listen, I get it. You don't like the UK. But do everyone (including yourself) a favour and don't make yourself look like an unhinged lunatic.

      @OzixiThrill@OzixiThrill6 ай бұрын
    • He does not realize that some countries in the EU do not use the euro (it is not obligatory), but only their own traditional currency, e.g. the euro is not used by Sweden, Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania or Hungary. In addition, after the debt crisis in the Eurozone in 2008-2011, EU countries that have large and strong economies, such as Poland, the Czech Republic or Sweden (as well as the UK, when it was a member of the EU), absolutely do not want to adopt the euro and still prefer their own monetary policy. The euro zone includes Italy, Germany, France, Spain, Portugal, the 3 Baltic countries, Slovakia, Austria, the Netherlands, Belgium, Greece, Finland, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Malta, Cyprus and Croatia (as of this year).

      @alh6255@alh62556 ай бұрын
    • The UK hasn’t revoked many EU Regs. What happened of Boris Johnson so-called « Bonfire of EU regulations » ? Nada, Zilch ! And as far as EU standards are concerned, the U.K. will abide by EU standards**, in Brexternity, ( otherwise UK goods won’t cross EU borders, as simple as that) like an obedient little satellite submitted to enormous attraction pull of, ultimately, a 36 countries trading bloc. ** EU standards, present and future, without having any input whatsoever, in the drafting of said future standards.

      @cyclistefroisse9267@cyclistefroisse92675 ай бұрын
  • Before Brexit, back in 2015 or 2014 the UK also blackmailed the EU into giving more extra perks or trigger the referendum for Brexit otherwise. The EU gave up and agreed to extra advantages for the UK and the UK still held the referendum. This says quite a lot about the quality of the British political class and how honourable it is...

    @741255@7412556 ай бұрын
  • wait, u had like ratio up until recently without the tool? its been gone like 2 years or something

    @henrikbuchholz1983@henrikbuchholz19836 ай бұрын
  • Wow... so the European Union is one year older than the Czech Republic (which is where I'm from). Interesting. The former Czechoslovakia decided to divide and since January 1993, our two countries are known as Czech Republic and Slovakia. Like Ryan said, it feels like ancient history but actually, it wasn't THAT long ago. It's kinda mindblowing.

    @KoffinKat@KoffinKat6 ай бұрын
    • What's more amazing is how fast you guys managed to develop since joining EU. If you look at Czech Republic and Slovakia today, it's like you never were communist. I just wish Romania and Bulgaria would've had the same progression.

      @jonsnow7092@jonsnow70926 ай бұрын
    • ​@@jonsnow7092is EU on the moon and I don't know?

      @eedragonr@eedragonr6 ай бұрын
    • @@eedragonr JWST, the most advanced human-made thing, was put into orbit by an EU rocket. difference between EU and Russia is that people have toilets inside.

      @jonsnow7092@jonsnow70926 ай бұрын
    • ​@@eedragonr Generally speaking the ESAT is on parity with Indian ISRO, and there was only one (succesful) orbiter sent around the moon. But you should know that NASA and other agencies around the world don't spit on European spaceborn experiments and apparatus for their projects.

      @rjbmarchiac8693@rjbmarchiac86935 ай бұрын
  • About the soviet collapse and eastern Europe, there was some violence. In particular, there were the Yugoslav wars, which saw Yugoslavia disintegrate into a bunch of different countries with different ethnic groups trying to murder each other. Ukraine and Bulgaria were almost entirely peaceful (EDIT: I can't believe I forgot Poland! Also in this category of peaceful democratic transition). Basically just referendums. Romania's transition was quite a bit rockier, with an uprising turning into a coup which resulted in the summary execution of Ceacescu, the dictator of Romania. Czechoslovakia, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania had peaceful protests which gained momentum and resulted in their independence. Hungary is a special case in all this, they had been under direct military occupation since 1956 when they attempted a country-wide uprising. The Russian troops finally left in 1991.

    @barbariandude@barbariandude6 ай бұрын
    • And as far as i know, we Hungarians made the first revolution against the Soviets in the states of the iron curtain.

      @tovarishcheleonora8542@tovarishcheleonora85426 ай бұрын
    • Although Yugoslavia was never part of the Soviet Union. It was a communist country, but has always refused to become part of the union.

      @CaptainKevinDarling@CaptainKevinDarling6 ай бұрын
    • @@CaptainKevinDarling Very true. It dissolved during the same timeframe as the dissolution of the USSR however, and it would be disingenuous to talk about eastern Europe in that timeframe without mentioning it.

      @barbariandude@barbariandude6 ай бұрын
    • Dude im Lithuanian what u talking about!??? To this day we honir on thr january 13th 13 people that were crashed by russian tanks in 1991!!!! Stop the peaceful rumour

      @user-cs4fg7bh4r@user-cs4fg7bh4r6 ай бұрын
    • @@user-cs4fg7bh4r In comparison to Yugoslavia, it was relatively peaceful. There was no full-blown war. The civilians were not shooting at OMON, and although Soviet police reacted in their typical aggressive "crush dissent at all costs" style, they generally used blanks and rubber bullets. It is of course a tragedy that 14 people died for your independence, but the hostilities were still comparatively light.

      @barbariandude@barbariandude6 ай бұрын
  • about the 1989-1991 thing with revolutions in eastern Europe, from what i know most of them were kinda peaceful, the only one i know was like a short war was in Romania, and after that comes some tensions in yugoslavia, but that was more about serbia vs other states.

    @bodeapaul3259@bodeapaul32593 ай бұрын
  • It is indeed all recent, I am a bit older, but I still remember that at the Belgian/Dutch border you had to stop and undergo checks for smuggling, especially butter, in the early sixties.

    @tomhighsmith@tomhighsmith6 ай бұрын
  • Little update since this is the older video - from 2023 Croatia is a member of both eurozone and Schengen area.

    @doriancroatia2054@doriancroatia20546 ай бұрын
  • Switzerland has been neutral, in just about EVERYTHING, since before WW1, and only helped for the first time, when they started sending aid to Ukraine, last year... the vid said, UK never changed to the Euro, along with most Nordic countries, which is why u cant find them, ever using it...

    @spyro257@spyro2576 ай бұрын
    • Laughs in Nazi Gold "neutral" deals 🤣

      @anonymusug727@anonymusug7276 ай бұрын
    • While they aren't legally required to provide the service, you are perfectly able to pay with euro (cash) in most Danish stores. You'll just have to convert currency yourself.

      @fastertove@fastertove6 ай бұрын
    • The main reason why they never joined the Euro is they purposely chose not to qualify to join.

      @gerardflynn7382@gerardflynn73826 ай бұрын
    • @@fastertove yeah true, u can, u just cant get Euro back...

      @spyro257@spyro2576 ай бұрын
    • @@gerardflynn7382 Slovakia joined and regrets to this day.

      @Jutubowiec1@Jutubowiec16 ай бұрын
  • Regarding Switzerland: Yes, officially there are not in. But in order to have a suitable import/export market they had to adopt a lot of rules without being part of the decision-making. Even regulations for aviation were taken over.

    @osterreichischerflochlandl4940@osterreichischerflochlandl49404 ай бұрын
  • What's the videoanalytic plugin you're using?

    @spacemarcoon1252@spacemarcoon12526 ай бұрын
  • All of the largest American companies have bases in IRELAND,,, companies like Apple,, Google,,, Facebook etc, this would suggest that they are not handling over their fair share to the Federal Reserve.

    @johnfrancismaglinchey4192@johnfrancismaglinchey41926 ай бұрын
    • Or any other Treasury.

      @continental_drift@continental_drift6 ай бұрын
    • There are two errors here. Firstly, the Reserve has nothing to do with taxation, that's the government. And secondly those companies pay taxes on the profit they make in the states. They use Ireland to reduce the taxation on sales in the EU. You have to pay taxes in the country you do business in, because you use the infrastructure there to even be able to provide the products.

      @Psi-Storm@Psi-Storm6 ай бұрын
    • @@Psi-Storm Yeah but they also don't pay the taxes in Ireland, they have set up in such a way as to have the USA identify them as an Irish company but also in a way that Ireland doesn't recognise them as an Irish company. Since neither country taxes foreign companies they basically pay no tax

      @timtimie@timtimie6 ай бұрын
    • Aren't those for their European operations only?

      @LupAlexandru@LupAlexandru6 ай бұрын
    • ​@@Psi-StormI think they end up paying about (a massive) 2% in tax. The trouble they have is then moving the money around. About 8 years ago I know the big corps was trying to get one time free (or little fee) apatriation of their foreign wealth. Not sure how it worked out for them.

      @StephenButlerOne@StephenButlerOne6 ай бұрын
  • They forgot a step, before the European coal and steel community there first was the BeNeLux, directly after the war wich began the coörperation between Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxemburg, that was the real start of the EU

    @StevenQ74@StevenQ746 ай бұрын
    • yeah when other European nations saw how how well the Benelux countries where able to work together so streamlined (and that just after WWII) they became inspired and thought it would be a good example of how the whole continent could become. without the Benelux there's a good chance we never would have gotten the EEC and later on EU.

      @ChristiaanHW@ChristiaanHW6 ай бұрын
  • For those who travelled and traded in Europe about fifty years ago, it is extraordinary to see how the difference in development between countries has narrowed, and how all the bureaucratic obstacles to import-export have been miraculously erased. Today only language remains the real obstacle to greater standardization within Europe.

    @user-pb4gl5dh4p@user-pb4gl5dh4p6 ай бұрын
    • An obstacle that we don't want to get rid of, tbh. Who's ready to give up his cultural heritage for bureaucratic convenience ?

      @karlkreuzberg6122@karlkreuzberg61223 ай бұрын
    • @@karlkreuzberg6122 I would not care tbh, but they are slowly doing this with english, so just keep the original language and add english. I'm from Italy btw.

      @andrealelli7505@andrealelli7505Ай бұрын
  • Switzerland never joined the EU. But there are many contracts that were negotiated and special exemptions and rules so Switzerland can now trade pretty freely and freedom of movement is also in place. So Switzerland is sort of a member in many aspects but not officially. There are also other countries who have special rules because in the early days the EU needed members or partners to succeed but now it's more established so countries that want to join have less wiggle room.

    @lukaszepesi@lukaszepesi6 ай бұрын
  • You just watched the part of the video which made it clear the UK (along with original member states Denmark and Sweden) didn’t join the Euro. I’m sure you also watched a video last month where this came up and you asked the same thing!

    @andyt8216@andyt82166 ай бұрын
    • Typical Ryan.

      @Thurgosh_OG@Thurgosh_OG6 ай бұрын
  • I really like what you do: you pick valuable videos from the internet to inform yourself and to improve your knowledge about the world. I wish more Americans would do the same like you do. Highly appreciated!

    @n1207@n12076 ай бұрын
  • The UK has never used the Euro, they have always used the Pound Sterling (commonly referred to as just "The Pound", abriviated as GBP)

    @RunawayTrain2502@RunawayTrain25026 ай бұрын
  • Nice video (I am from Luxembourg) and yes, Switzerland and norway for example are not in the EU but in the Schengen treaty... a small town (rather a big village) in Luxembourg by the way :). You knew more than your were telling although you are young, yes... liked it !

    @svenpedersen9140@svenpedersen91406 ай бұрын
  • This is about the European Union but there is another free trade organisation in Europe, EFTA (European Free Trade Association), that includes Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Liechtenstein. These countries still do have reservations about joining EU so EFTA still exists (used to include UK, all the Nordic countries and more before they joined EU) but there is an agreement between the EFTA countries (excluding Switzerland) that created EEA (European Economic Area). EEA is basically EU/EFTA free market/trade/movement of people/jobs between the countries within these two associations.

    @MrPicky@MrPicky6 ай бұрын
    • Which has to fund the EU

      @Salfordian@Salfordian6 ай бұрын
    • @@Salfordian EFTA has to pay to be in EEA that is for sure but I guess it is also getting some benefits though not in the same matter as a EU member state. Yet still the EFTA countries do not want to join the EU.

      @MrPicky@MrPicky6 ай бұрын
    • @@MrPicky EVERYTHING is about money, other peoples money when it comes to the EU & all those new countries who joined and waiting to join want those handouts, yes the EU has to bribe them

      @Salfordian@Salfordian6 ай бұрын
  • What's missing from this clip is that since 2023 both Moldova and Ukraine obtained candidate status to the EU and are set to join pending some administrative and judicial reforms. If this were to happen the only former USSR members on the European continent which are not members of the EU would be Belarus and Russia itself. And yes, the collapse of USSR is remarkable in how peaceful it was, but we're still seeing echoes of it's collapse with the later wars in Moldova, Georgia, Nagorno-Krabakh and of course Ukraine. These conflicts can be thought of as part of the collapse of the USSR, even though they happened years or decades later. And I don't think we've seen the last of it.

    @e1123581321345589144@e11235813213455891446 ай бұрын
  • Companies don't just register in Ireland, to avail of low corporation tax. Many international corporations have their European headquarters in Ireland, including multiple US multi-nationals. Ireland has other advantages, including being English speaking, and having a highly educated work force.

    @mbd6054@mbd60546 ай бұрын
  • The UK never used the Euro. It is actually mentioned half-way in the video. It was a recognised neighbour currency, but not legal tender in the UK. Regardless of what people say, Euro scepticism was the leading contributor to Brexit, issues had been bubbling away for decades without any true resolution. The final nail in the coffin came when British Politicians used it as a Voting tool and the EU commissioner refused to negotiate and made a impactful statement world wide, "The EU will never change, not even for Britain". Also, there is a factor in the video that is incorrect. During the immigration Spring, the EU had open arms to the millions coming in without any restrictions. Immediately after the UK voted to leave, only then did the EU realise the situation was dire and started to regulate incoming immigration... yet in the video it states it did it before the UK voted to leave. Part of the UK/EU negotiations prior to the Brexit Referendum were for the EU to slow down and regulate inbound immigration... which the EU refused, leading to the Prime Minister of the UK authorising the vote to go ahead. Due to UK status before it left, things now have almost reached similar circumstances to prior. With the only big differences being that some additional paperwork between the two being required for protected goods and the UK no longer having a say in EU affairs. That's it. That is all Brexit ultimately achieved... oh except the typical "freedom" that the minority always scream. But on a good note, it's promising to see the UK and EU working together and all happened without much bloodshed. I say much... A MP (Member of Parliament/Politician) was "unalived" by a mental health patient in the UK in the lead up to the vote, with their motive being "the MP was pro EU". That was still one incident too many.

    @babalonkie@babalonkie3 ай бұрын
  • Different languages yes, but a shared European heritage. Proud EU citizen here!

    @MrMickey1987@MrMickey19876 ай бұрын
    • Hear. Hear.

      @mbd6054@mbd60546 ай бұрын
    • Not a proud EU citizen here. My country should leave the EU, we pay for everyone else, this must stop.

      @mgordon1713@mgordon17135 ай бұрын
    • @@mgordon1713 Really? You write English exactly like an American.

      @mbd6054@mbd60545 ай бұрын
    • @@mbd6054 Too many American movies I guess

      @mgordon1713@mgordon17135 ай бұрын
    • @@mgordon1713 your not realizing everything you get back trough the economic opportunities EU membership provides. Take one long look at the hot mess that is BREXIT...

      @MrMickey1987@MrMickey19875 ай бұрын
  • he must of zoned out at the Euro bit, as he would have seen that the UK never adopted the Euro.

    @johng.1703@johng.17036 ай бұрын
    • Typical Ryan, I'm afraid. He's not as bad as his brother at missing or forgetting things he's just seen but he does it fairly regularly.

      @Thurgosh_OG@Thurgosh_OG6 ай бұрын
    • the UK never adopted the Euro nor the EU; so finally we are free from the UK.

      @BenelliMr@BenelliMr6 ай бұрын
    • ​@@Thurgosh_OG... Who is his brother?

      @Tidybitz@Tidybitz6 ай бұрын
  • After the financial crisis In 2008 it got so bad in Greece that normal people were only allowed to withdraw small amounts of the money they held in their bank account from ATM's. They were limited to a maximum of €60 (about $70) worth of cash per day. It wasn't until 2018 that this limitation was fully lifted! (Though the maximum daily amount they could withdraw had been increased over time)

    @PhoenixNL72-DEGA-@PhoenixNL72-DEGA-2 ай бұрын
  • Even I learned something 😅 This all realy did happen just recently, crazy when you think of it. And the development is still going, hope for the better, future will tell. A unity like this has to benefit the people. Just hope it won't collapse under its own success.

    @jeroenrat6289@jeroenrat62896 ай бұрын
  • 18:22 UK has never used the euro

    @schnelma605@schnelma6056 ай бұрын
  • The uk has always been different to Europe. You can think about it like this... Germany, France and anyother mainland European country identity as European The UK identifies as British or insert whichever country you live in, yes we're in the European continent but its a very them and us attatude due to us being an island

    @tomstorey8559@tomstorey85596 ай бұрын
    • Indeed. That "them versus us" attitude mainly exists in the UK and not so much on the European mainland. Even now, after all that has happend, the attitude on the mainland isn't so much a "them versus us" attitude but more like "you're on your own now, we wish you all the best". Although I must say that some of us also have an additional feeling of "good riddance". And I am sure, some Brits have that exact same feeling.

      @AlexGys9@AlexGys96 ай бұрын
    • @@AlexGys9 If that 'good riddance' attitude prevailed in the upper echelons of the EU administration, they wouldn't be trying every means possible to get the UK back in. They miss the UK's money and are afraid that with Germany's failing (slowly) economy and the UK's economy still growing (slowly), that they will not be able to sustain the Euro as a viable currency for much longer, with France as the only other big economy of the EU.

      @Thurgosh_OG@Thurgosh_OG6 ай бұрын
    • @@Thurgosh_OG Maybe, some people miss UK in the Eu Parliement, mainly those that could always count on the UK to make troubles and cater to lobbies ^^. Otherwise, i don't see any news even talking about the UK rejoining, except in the UK of course ^^.

      @gaetanhillion8342@gaetanhillion83426 ай бұрын
    • @@Thurgosh_OG Relax mate. You are glad you're out. I am glad you're out. Both of us happy now. I wish you all the best on your island. And I am sure you wish us all the best on our mainland.

      @AlexGys9@AlexGys96 ай бұрын
  • What plugin are you using for dislikecount?

    @PunsCulture@PunsCulture5 ай бұрын
  • As a European (who no longer supports the CURRENT EU), I'd like to ask, What's that plugin you mention at the beginning?

    @ibizenco@ibizenco4 ай бұрын
    • The European Union is one of the best things that has happened and could happen to the European countries. However, I no longer support the current EU: the EU should become smaller, cheaper, more democratic and stronger (internationally).

      @ibizenco@ibizenco4 ай бұрын
  • I just realized watching someone reacting to information videos are way more entertaining than musical things

    @ahsenserhat9270@ahsenserhat92706 ай бұрын
    • But I dont like him not being focused. UK never had EURO and he is sure it's other way around.

      @unwokeneuropean3590@unwokeneuropean35906 ай бұрын
    • @@unwokeneuropean3590 I think that is a very reasonable assumption, it's wrong but understanble. It's probably a Mandela effect in USA. I'm pretty sure %99 of the population thinks like that. Pikachu's tail never had a black stripe, Monopoly man never weared a glass, England never used Euro.

      @ahsenserhat9270@ahsenserhat92706 ай бұрын
    • @@ahsenserhat9270 bs

      @weltuntergangsbote@weltuntergangsbote6 ай бұрын
  • The most mind-blowing thing about the EU is that most of the countries in Europe have thousands of years of violent history with each other, not to mention two devastating "great" wars in the 20th century that practically decimated our continent, as well as ancient gripes that dates back to the earliest recorded history. It is why I will always support the EU as a concept, even when I disagree with specific policies: A unified Europe has led to an unprecedented era of peace on a continent with a long and bloody history of senseless conflict.

    @LadyDoomsinger@LadyDoomsinger6 ай бұрын
    • yeah for millennia empires tried to rule Europe (among others: Romans, Charlemagne, Napoleon, N*zi's, USSR) and after 2 devastating World Wars and the looming danger of being annexed by the USSR. Europe finally (gradually) came together and managed to unite in a peaceful way with keeping every member state sovereign. the EU is (probably) the biggest and most successful peace project ever tried in the world. and for EU citizens it has brought unparalleled benefits. ps. of course there are still flaws but if you look at the age and size of the EU it's only logical that there are still some problems that need to be ironed out. but those problems are small in comparison to all the benefits of the EU (only just the safety from another (world) war makes it worth it)

      @ChristiaanHW@ChristiaanHW6 ай бұрын
    • I disagree.American and Russian nukes have kept the peace in, a far less powerful and confident, Europe.

      @leithblower@leithblower6 ай бұрын
    • @@leithblower Uh... We have very different definitions of peace, if you consider the threat of nuclear Armageddon "peace".

      @LadyDoomsinger@LadyDoomsinger6 ай бұрын
    • Yes long live the European peace we live in! Pax Europae

      @3starYT@3starYT6 ай бұрын
    • @@leithblower You're right and wrong at the same time. Sure the nuclear threat stopped a third world war, but it didn't kept peace. think of Vietnam, Korea, first afghanistan war... During that time, the european continent was at peace certainly because of the proto EU. Think about it, every forty years France and Germany duke it out, after Schuman ? No war there, and it's still the case. Russia don't really fear the US, it's fear EU because it work, mostly and i think that's why they unlawfuly occupied Crimea when the people of Ukraine turn toward the EU. Or i can be completly wrong too ^^. About Russia... I'm pretty sure of myself about the nuclear threat ^^.

      @gaetanhillion8342@gaetanhillion83426 ай бұрын
  • Everyone is ignorant, intelligent people seek to reduce their ignorance, you sir are an intelligent person. 👌

    @peterwarner553@peterwarner5534 ай бұрын
  • You could also look into the Council of Europe, which does a lot of (in my opinion) interesting jurisdictions with its court the European Court of Human Rights. Currently 46 countries are a member. I think they are also quite important for the EU-citizens.

    @larissaswinkels3661@larissaswinkels36616 ай бұрын
  • You said that you are surprised that Soviet collapse and dissolution happened without major wars. It may be a good illustration that a collapse of an empire is a lengthy, continuous thing, not a single event. We are fighting the dissolution wars right now, in Ukraine. It's that same war happening exactly as a process of collapse continues. And before that there were Chechen wars, Georgian wars, etc. If you'll look back to the fall of Russian empire in 1917 - it also happened very fast and without major wars, but THEN three decades of war followed, where Russia fought to gather the countries back into Soviet Union. Many, many small imperial wars. It's a process. We haven't yet lived through it.

    @grahortarg9933@grahortarg99336 ай бұрын
  • Switzerland has never been part of anything since the early 1800s. They have a very strong tradition of neutrality. Greenland leaving the EU was definitely not like the UK leaving. The UK kept behaving like a cat - when they were outside, they wanted to be inside and once they were inside long enough, they wanted out again - but when we opened the door for them they just kept nagging. I wasnt alive when Greenland left but England as a country is very good at nagging. As far as Im aware, the other parts of the UK wanted to stay but England has the most inhabitants by far. Ireland has the lowest corporate tax rates across the EU, so most international big companies have their european headquarters over there.

    @WereDictionary@WereDictionary6 ай бұрын
  • Greetings from Switzerland! You are not an ignorant, you are learning! You totally should come to Europe one day and visit some places here. You will be totally confused about the city layouts, since they were not planned, but developed over time, so no grid system! Bliib gsund!

    @OchsnerVinzenz@OchsnerVinzenz6 ай бұрын
  • Switzerland and Norway are not in the EU officially, but practically (economically) they are. At the same time they both have such a strong economic background that they don't actually need to be in the EU but basically are part of the single European market.

    @Ramathustra@Ramathustra15 күн бұрын
  • The UNITED KINGDOM never used the Euro.

    @johnfrancismaglinchey4192@johnfrancismaglinchey41926 ай бұрын
  • Depends on what you mean by major war. On the scale of World War? Not really. But there was quite a bloody guerilla war waged by the Batlic states. You can look up The Forest Brothers (that's what the resistance was called) even though that didn't directly result in independance, the Soviets didn't have an easy time, because the forest brothers were a thorn for decades

    @HellDuke-@HellDuke-6 ай бұрын
    • he didn't mean that the Soviets took over these countries without a major war, but that they relinquished control in the 90s peacefully and not as a result of major wars, which is true - there have been some major conflicts causes by the collapse of communism, but it wasn't about Soviets trying to retain control, it was about interethnic violence erupting as a result of the Soviets no longer controlling everyone (Nagorno Karabakh, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Transnistria etc)

      @igorbednarski8048@igorbednarski80486 ай бұрын
    • There were also regular domestic wars on a large scale in Poland and Czechoslovakia up to 1948 and in Greece (but Greece, which was supposed to be in the Eastern bloc, was ultimately strongly helped by Great Britain, which was afraid to help Poland). And it's a pity, because, as it turned out, Stalin, and then the USSR, were afraid to intervene in Poland (during numerous Polish strikes and mass revolts before 1989) and were generally afraid of Poles. Therefore, among others In Poland, it was not possible to introduce communism as sharply as in other Central European countries, not to mention USSR. It was not possible to introduce collective farms, abolish private ownership of land, companies and houses, liquidate private business (at least small and medium-sized ones), limit the autonomy of universities or even scouting, limit cultural and personal contacts with the Western bloc and intimidate openly anti-communist society. Even a small support for Poland after 1945 would free it from Stalinist terror, Soviet influence and the idiocy of a centrally controlled economy, and it would also help other countries in Central Europe. Stalin was even afraid to take away from Poland the areas in the east where there were rich gas deposits. He only dared to do it in 1952, when he was sure that no one would help Poland in case of emergency (currently these territories are in Ukraine). ​

      @alh6255@alh62556 ай бұрын
    • Do not forget the Hungarian Revolution, which was the 1st revolution in the region against the Soviets.

      @tovarishcheleonora8542@tovarishcheleonora85426 ай бұрын
    • @@tovarishcheleonora8542 After World War 2? Earlier, there were bloody civil wars in Poland and Greece (1945-1948, Greece received help from Great Britain, which is why it eventually escaped from the Eastern bloc), as well as a civil war in Czechoslovakia (1948) and revolt in Poland in 1954, the so-called Poznan accidents (resulting in the killing of many ppl). Nevertheless, the Budapest uprising against the communists was indeed a major event, but the only one in this country until the fall of communism. In turn, Poles regularly rebelled every few years, including massively in 1968, 1970, 1976 and 1981 (the birth of the Solidarity movement), and in 1987. In 1968, an uprising broke out in Czechoslovakia (or rather in the Czechia, because the Slovaks supported it poorly), which was suppressed, but at the same time it ended Stalinism, which lasted much longer in Czechoslovakia than in other communist countries. As for Poland, thanks to constant strikes, protests and public resistance, the communists did not manage to create collective farms, liquidate small and medium-sized private companies, nor the autonomy of universities, the significant role of the Catholic Church and other denominations, or regular contacts of Polish society with Western culture (free tourist trips of Poles after 1968, films, books, newspapers, including anti-communist Polish publications from abroad after 1956). In other words, communism in Poland was the most liberal in the world, the communists were afraid to put too much pressure on the Poles, and the USSR was afraid to intervene militarily. Ultimately Poles managed free elections in Poland in the first half of 1989 and the creation of a democratic parliament and government, and it lead to initiate the fall of communism in Central Europe (the next ones were Czechoslovakia in the autumn, then Germany, Hungary, and in December 1989 Romania and finally Bulgaria)

      @alh6255@alh62556 ай бұрын
  • technicly swiss is not in europe union but have agree to many europe agreement like schengen area etc, schengen between country work like moving from state to state in america, your ID is valid without need a passport, you will rarely be stop at a border between country in europe, only douane control sometimes to check if you don't import stuff that are prohibed in the country you try to enter.

    @darksharkix7959@darksharkix79592 ай бұрын
  • @9:09 they stil aren't. Same as Norway, they too stayed out forever. Both smart to do so, they are both very thriving economies

    @littleDutchie92@littleDutchie926 ай бұрын
KZhead