A Decent Plane With A Deadly Problem: Fairey Barracuda

2024 ж. 29 Сәу.
41 934 Рет қаралды

In this video we talk about the Fairey Barracuda, a World War 2-era British torpedo bomber and dive bomber. We first talk about the naming conventions of the American and British militaries, and how planes like the Fairey Barracuda get their names. We then talk about the state of British torpedo bombers early in WW2, with the Fairey Swordfish and Fairey Albacore being their two most prominent. We look at the design competition to replace those planes, and the two designs that emerged from it, the Barracuda and the Supermarine 322 "Dumbo".
We then look at the delayed testing and production of both of these planes, due to issues with weight, power, and technology. We then look at the performance of the Barracuda when it finally arrived to combat in 1943 and how it delivered decent production, with one major positive exception in a mission against the German Battleship Tirpitz. We then look at it's more lackluster performance in the Pacific, and we end by looking at a mysterious problem that plagued the Barracuda for most of the war, where pilots were being knocked unconscious and crashing.

Пікірлер
  • There's a project going on in England to build another one out of parts from crashed ones. I really recommend it. They usually have updates every Friday.

    @oxcart4172@oxcart417221 күн бұрын
    • Where, who, when and build another what?

      @DaveSCameron@DaveSCameron21 күн бұрын
    • @@DaveSCameron A barracuda, It is under restoration by the Fleet Air Arm at Yeovilton in England, they are restoring one from a number of crashed aircraft to a static display standard. They are not going to get it to a flying standard as the parts from the crashed are too badly damaged for use in a flying airframe and, as a museum they wish to retain as much of the original aircraft as possible. If they got it to flying condition they would have had to replace so many components it would be classed as a replica with no historical significance.

      @scrumpydrinker@scrumpydrinker21 күн бұрын
    • @@DaveSCameron YOLO

      @emaheiwa8174@emaheiwa817421 күн бұрын
  • I think it’s telling that the U.S.Navy went from the Douglas TBD-1 to the Grumman TBF Avenger, both arguably state-of-the-art designs. The Royal Navy on the other hand in the same period went from the Fairey Swordfish (more state-of-the-ark), an aircraft that achieved much due to heroic crews rather than aircraft performance. The Fairey Albacore might have reduced the crews pneumonia risk, but didn’t advance much else. The Fairey Barracuda, well, I think Capt Eric Brown summed it up rather well, “Folded for stowage the Barracuda looked like the result of a rather nasty accident.” I think the long post-WW2 service of the TBM in a range of roles compared with the rapid extinction of the Barracuda tells you everything you need to know about these aircraft.

    @proteusnz99@proteusnz999 күн бұрын
  • I really enjoy your uploads…..I laughed out loud when you said the Barracuda was kind enough to put the pilot to sleep before murdering them. 🤣

    @jongoffinet8511@jongoffinet851121 күн бұрын
  • As far as the teen series is concerned (F-14,F-15, F-16 and F/A-18) the reason why the 18 is the only 1 of the 4 with the "F/A" designation is at the start it was planned to have 2 distinct versions...a fighter only version (F-18) and an attack only version (A-18) but early in the programme it was decided to merge them together in 1 airframe to keep costs down....hence "F/A".

    @jaws848@jaws84821 күн бұрын
    • They were planning to make land only versions too, by Northrop, the Grumman version just being the carrier version. However foreign airforces, like Australia, Canada & Finland were quite happy to buy the carrier version, leaving the land version stillborn. Meaning they got a tougher plane with marine certification for the plane including the engines, making it suitable for shoreline airfields. Makes one ask how much the US would save if the airforce simply bought the same planes the navy bought. Australia forgot to take this into account when it purchased the F35, buying the A variant, leading to the corrosion issues it has now, due to a significant percentage of the RAAF’s major fighter airfields being on the coast.

      @mickvonbornemann3824@mickvonbornemann382420 күн бұрын
    • Sorry, where I typed Grumman, I meant MacDonnell Douglas. The browser I’m using doesn’t seem to be compatible with UTube’s edit feature.

      @mickvonbornemann3824@mickvonbornemann382420 күн бұрын
  • Swordfish, the Terror of Taranto. 🎵🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

    @DaveSCameron@DaveSCameron21 күн бұрын
    • At 90 mph 🤣

      @johnstirling6597@johnstirling659721 күн бұрын
    • @@johnstirling6597 Slow but steady wins the race...

      @gingervirus2988@gingervirus298817 күн бұрын
  • Eric Brown in his autobiography "Wings on My Sleeve" describes another issue with the Barracuda which led to a number of pilots being killed during training. This was a sudden nose-drop that occurred when the aircraft turned sharply away from the target after releasing the torpedo at low level, and could result in it diving into the sea. Brown doesn't say what the solution was, but I would guess it was a change in tactics rather than any alteration to the aircraft.

    @CharlesStearman@CharlesStearman20 күн бұрын
  • The other design fault was loss of lift caused by opening the canopy so that air came up and out of the cockpit and that airflow detached the upper airflow on the top of the inner wing and that turbulence then interfered with the tail. Fixed with a floor to the cockpit.

    @malcolmmoy@malcolmmoy21 күн бұрын
    • So before that they just didnt have a floor? Or an entire floor?

      @shakybill3@shakybill321 күн бұрын
    • @@shakybill3 More of a sealing the floor by installing a strip that prevented air from coming up through the floor.

      @roysutherland4681@roysutherland468121 күн бұрын
  • My father, while in the RAF saw a model of a Barracuda in a shop window. It had been made by someone who, with a keen eye, had seen a prototype flying over. Security spotted this and it had to be removed. It was, apparently, then on the secret list.

    @johnjephcote7636@johnjephcote763619 күн бұрын
  • The way they devise aircraft names, and numbers is fascinating and you should do an entire episode on that. And I actually love Heart.

    @ExcuseMePhoney@ExcuseMePhoney21 күн бұрын
    • Geoffrey de Haviland once said, when offialdom was having no interest in the prototype Mosquito, that his company was asked to build the wings for another's aircraft, apparently called the Ape. I have never been able to find out what and whose kite this was to have been.

      @johnjephcote7636@johnjephcote763619 күн бұрын
    • ​@@johnjephcote7636 the Armstrong Whitworth was a single research plane first flown on 5 January 1926 to "answer all the questions of aerodynamics." It could be configured and tested in an infinite range of configurations to see which ones worked best. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armstrong_Whitworth_Ape

      @survivingworldsteam@survivingworldsteam15 күн бұрын
  • You made me laugh so hard 😸 I was whistling the song even before playing the video! BARRACUDA!

    @cesarvidelac@cesarvidelac21 күн бұрын
  • I did learn something today, thank you. That story of the ether poisoning was definitely new to me.

    @kitbag9033@kitbag903320 күн бұрын
  • Once again Westland got told to build someone else's aircraft. On names, each company had their own conventions. In this period Avro named theirs for cities (Manchester, Lancaster, York, Lincoln), de Havilland used insects, Fairey used a mix of predatory fishes and seabirds for its carrier aircraft but were pretty random otherwise. A number used a standard often alliterative initial letter, Miles used M, Short Brothers used S, Bristol used B, Handley Page used H as did Hawker, Gloster used G until the Meteor, Vickers used V or W, Westland used W (apart from the Lysander for army reasons).

    @MatthewDoye@MatthewDoye21 күн бұрын
    • Hawker had a 'storm' theme going for their fighters: Hurricane, Tornado, Typhoon, Tempest, Fury. Supermarine had a marine mammals theme for their seaplanes for a little while (Walrus, Sea Otter), and a S for spite theme going for piston fighters (spitfire, spiteful and seafang).

      @nerd1000ify@nerd1000ify21 күн бұрын
    • @@nerd1000ify Yep, thanks for the additions, those were just the ones I could think of.

      @MatthewDoye@MatthewDoye21 күн бұрын
  • The Merlin 32 was one of the 'cropped' Merlins with a smaller supercharger impeller, max power was achieved at only 610m altitude. That's why the top speed decreased for the Mk II, it had power only when flying low in dense air.

    @nerd1000ify@nerd1000ify21 күн бұрын
  • My father serviced Barracudas when he was in the Fleet Air Arm. He said they were horrible aircraft from a maintenance point of view. The undercarriage was complex and not over strong and the height of the engine meant using a ladder or staging for virtually every job. Not always easy on a carrier at sea.

    @peterdavy6110@peterdavy611016 күн бұрын
  • In the raid on the Tirpitz the Barracudas failed to penetrate the armoured deck so there was no magazine explosion (like the USS Arizona suffered at Pearl Harbor). Mostly because the armoured deck on the Tirpitz was thicker overall and reinforced above the magazines. But they did wreck pretty much everything above the armoured deck and that put the ship out of action, it never was fully repaired before 617 Dambusters squadron finished it off with Tallboy bombs..

    @philiphumphrey1548@philiphumphrey154816 күн бұрын
  • Thanks. I must remember the bit about spontaneously spraying hot jets of soporific hydraulic oil at the pilot if I wake up in a pain free haze slumped inside a plunging Barracuda.

    @hazchemel@hazchemel6 күн бұрын
  • I read somewhere that an American naval officer (captain or admiral ?) on seeing the Barracuda remarked " it seems like a great flying machine but, it will never replace the airplane".

    @surferdude7013@surferdude701314 күн бұрын
  • I really like your videos. It's always neat to learn about a plane I didn't know existed a half hour ago. Thanks and keep up the good work.

    @98erics@98erics21 күн бұрын
  • Really enjoyable, as usual. Aloha! A video about Eric Brown’s opinions on various planes might be interesting…

    @brookeshenfield7156@brookeshenfield715621 күн бұрын
  • My grandfather had Barracudas on the escort carrier he served on - they frequently used them for reconnaissance. He said they sometimes also used them for ferrying vips. Apparently, in a pinch you could stuff several people into one of them. Must have been an awful way to fly.

    @2011Kestrel@2011Kestrel21 күн бұрын
    • Very Intense Position

      @JTA1961@JTA196120 күн бұрын
    • They used Battles for this ferrying work in South Africa - out of harm's way by then. Barracudas were also dubbed 'Barra-wee-wees'. The 'wee-wee' implying weak and rather a piss-off.

      @johnjephcote7636@johnjephcote763619 күн бұрын
    • Barracuda for reconnaissance? Ops officer: What did you see? Barracuda pilot: Just my wings, not much else.

      @grantm6514@grantm651410 күн бұрын
  • 'The wings tend to get ripped off in standard tactical maneouvers.' lol! USN officials went on record to the RCN Fleet Air Arm that the McDonnel Douglas Banshee warplanes supplied to them tended to shed their wings during violent aerial maneouvers. RCN pilots no doubt were dismayed by this as an RCN Fleet Air Arm pilot on exchange to a USN squadron brought in his Phantom to his a/c carrier inverted and flipping his a/c at the precise moment to catch the tailhook. It was common for these guys to test their cosmic chariots like this. We badly need boys like this in uniform pdq. : (

    @martkbanjoboy8853@martkbanjoboy885320 күн бұрын
    • McDonnel Banshee

      @user-xj6rr3yv8q@user-xj6rr3yv8q14 күн бұрын
    • ​​​@@user-xj6rr3yv8qThis pilot I speak of was loaned to the USN and was on his tour of duty with the USN squadron for the Cuban Missile Crisis. His C.O. at his RCN Fleet Air Arm squadron wrote to the USN C.O. mentioning the pilot was absolutely forbidden from flying wartime sorties if WWIII broke out. I am not sure what would actually have happened. Peacetime plans tend to get flushed down the toilet in wartime.

      @martkbanjoboy8853@martkbanjoboy88538 күн бұрын
  • Thanks for sharing 👍

    @CraigLYoung@CraigLYoung21 күн бұрын
  • Great song. Great video.

    @randomvariable1836@randomvariable183620 күн бұрын
  • @11:12 you have the shot of the fairey firefly which also had the youngman flaps.

    @timcvetic5054@timcvetic505413 күн бұрын
  • 17:55 Even today radar can't detect submarines. The aircraft using radar in WWII to detect submarines was only detecting these ships on the surface. Early on the days of ASW aircraft the Germans quickly learned to surface only at night. At first the aircraft used lights to find the subs on the surface, because the subs could see the lights from miles away and easily avoid them. Then the planes started keeping the lights off, only turning the lights on when the planes were very close. It was some time before the Geromans realized they were being detected with radar.

    @erictaylor5462@erictaylor546219 күн бұрын
    • ... and keeping them below the surface was already half the rent since it seriously limited the u-boats visual range. Please keep in mind that success in the battle of the atlantic wasn't neccessarely measured in U-boats sunk but in supplies delivered to britain relative to losses endured in the attempt. Apart from that - don't forget the arctic where the sun wouldn't set or rise for months during summer or winter respectively.

      @JosipRadnik1@JosipRadnik1Күн бұрын
  • Sorry, had to comment again - the Spearfish!?! What a terrible design, what is it with these aircraft? Couldn't anyone in British aviation industry produce a decent looking/performing torpedo bomber? They were all so heavy and clunky looking, it's amazing they could take off let alone carry a torpedo a reasonable distance. I still find it incredible that the Swordfish served right through WWII even outliving it's supposed replacement, the Albacore. I heartily agree with Eric Brown's assessment of the Grumman Avenger, a thoroughly well conceived and designed navy aircraft with a good all round range, load carrying ability and speed, it looked cool too. Great breakdown, look forward to more.

    @baanibarnes9711@baanibarnes971121 күн бұрын
    • Swordfish 👏👏👏

      @DaveSCameron@DaveSCameron21 күн бұрын
    • At the time that the aircraft manufacturers were designing their aircraft we British knew that we would be going to war with Germany (again) and the other Axis nations, thus the priority was not to be building prototypes but the aircraft that we were going to send into battle, and unlike the USA and Russia who didn’t enter WWII until they were attacked/ready to enter the war we were, unfortunately, going to be leading from the front (as usual) and it damn near bankrupted us, material like aluminium, steel, rubber and fluids became scarce, scarce enough to stop building prototypes, we had to rely on what we had at the time and hope that enough development could be achieved to replace our existing aircraft, and during war the aesthetic of an aircraft was immaterial to what it was capable of doing. We might have been operating aged biplanes during the war but they performed as well as could be expected and more besides, look at the attack on Taranto harbour, the disabling of the Bismarck and the exploits of three aircraft which were nicknamed “Faith Hope and Charity”, please take a look at these examples of how our torpedo bombers and “string bags” faired for yourself, and whilst your at it look at the biplanes the United States 🇺🇸 Navy were operating at the time, they were not exactly pretty. I really do wish people would stop comparing the British and Commonwealth aircraft with the United States aircraft, there are very many variables between the two countries that direct comparison is worthless and invariably wrong. As for not having a designer who could design a good looking torpedo bomber the answer is yes there was but unfortunately they were busy designing and building aircraft for the Battle of Britain and the battle of the Atlantic.

      @allandavis8201@allandavis820121 күн бұрын
    • What I loved about the Swordfish was its continued development whereby it got both radar and rockets! As for a 'good British torpedo bomber .... Fairey Gannet! The only Sub Hunter Killer

      @uingaeoc3905@uingaeoc390521 күн бұрын
    • I can't believe how many things they have sticking off the wings of the Barracuda. My god. Have they never heard of drag? There's no less than 3 items sticking up and 1 down PER WING and one of those is an entire antenna mast.

      @alexsis1778@alexsis177821 күн бұрын
    • A big problem with with Britosh carrier aircraft was the fact that from April 1918 until just before the outbreak of World War 2 was that everything pertaining to aviation was controlled by the Air Ministry. At a time when the USN and Japanese Navies (controlling their own aviation) were working out just what could be done and what aircraft were needed the RN was hamstrung by a disinteresed Air Ministry which tended to make up their minds about naval aviation often without checking facts. For instance the Ministry believed that the USS Langley couldn't possibly operate more than 20 aircraft when they were operating over 30 and even up to 40. They all but forbade the Admiralty from learning ANYTHING about naval aviation and whenever the Admiralty took up the matter all successive governments could do was shrug and say that when it came to aeroplanes the Air Ministry were the experts and so the Admiralty should shut up and listen. Read 'The Dawn of Carrier Strike.' by David Hobbs. It is about the trials and tribulations of the inter war Fleet Air Arm regarding equipment, dictrine and all the political nonsense affecting the FAA. Given we know what ended up happening it's almost a tragic read - but well worth it.

      @richardarcher7177@richardarcher717721 күн бұрын
  • Never understood why they didn't use the RR Griffon as it's a superb low altitude and high horsepower engine that was only slightly larger than the Merlin. Plenty of room for it in this airframe.

    @malcolmmoy@malcolmmoy21 күн бұрын
    • The Mk.V had a Griffon

      @FinsburyPhil@FinsburyPhil21 күн бұрын
    • Was the Griffon available when the Barracuda was designed?

      @pcka12@pcka1221 күн бұрын
    • I wonder how it would have done with the Napier Sabre in , although that engine was problematic it plenty of power.

      @michaelleslie2913@michaelleslie291320 күн бұрын
    • @@michaelleslie2913 the original RR Exe 24 cylinder, sleeve valve engine was more powerful than the RR Merlin engines first fitted & similar to the Napier Sabre which developed over it's period of service.

      @pcka12@pcka1220 күн бұрын
    • ​@pcka12 the exe was in a different league but unnecessary due to jet engines

      @womble321@womble32120 күн бұрын
  • Has anyone else noticed that Supermarine only ever produced the one beautiful design, the superlative Spitfire, all the other designs they have put out are horrendous including that horrible torpedo bomber. Weird huh?!?

    @baanibarnes9711@baanibarnes971121 күн бұрын
    • A matter of opinion I would suggest, clearly the Spitfire has almost become the logo for Allied air power and is so ingrained in our culture it would be impossible to out do it but take away the legendary halo I believe Supermarine made a few belters including the Seafire and the flying boat but other contenders. 🎚️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

      @DaveSCameron@DaveSCameron21 күн бұрын
    • Literally puting all of their aritistic skill on Spitfire and then none for others.

      @DOSFS@DOSFS21 күн бұрын
    • It's later jet aircraft were fine but they managed some truly hideous piston engine types in the 30s and 40s

      @MatthewDoye@MatthewDoye21 күн бұрын
    • Supermarine's jet aircraft were quite good looking.

      @tomgoff7887@tomgoff788721 күн бұрын
    • Supermarine Swift was attractive, but wasn’t especially successful.

      @dougcastleman9518@dougcastleman951821 күн бұрын
  • Your voice is golden sir

    @RoderickMcDuffie@RoderickMcDuffie21 күн бұрын
  • I once while on vacation in Greece I met an elderly gentleman who was a Barracuda pilot during WW2 will never forget him and his under stated description of this perilous aircraft . What an absolute hero ❤

    @michaelleslie2913@michaelleslie291321 күн бұрын
    • Was thus the trip when you met Eddie Rickenbacker in Crete?

      @JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe21 күн бұрын
    • @@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe wow a comedian 👏

      @michaelleslie2913@michaelleslie291320 күн бұрын
    • @@michaelleslie2913 Wish this was funny.

      @JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe20 күн бұрын
  • That shoulder-mounted wing was a bad idea, too. The most successful torpedo bomber monoplane designs in WW2 were low-winged or mid-winged.

    @user-je5do6jn2f@user-je5do6jn2f17 күн бұрын
  • ...bomp-diddy-bomp diddy-bomp diddy - bop-ba-da-daahhhh - wooh-ooh-ooh, now wouldn't ya, Barracuda.

    @dennismason3740@dennismason374021 күн бұрын
  • The volume of aircraft built and the lack of use in its intended performance makes one wonder who ordered these aircraft. The Navy as Britain’s senior service makes you think there was lots of older, crusty Admirals I presume, sitting around in a gentlemen’s club over dinner organising the spending on the Admiralties budget allotment. Bit of a shame really as it contributed to Britain’s bankruptcy in the 1950s.

    @briancavanagh7048@briancavanagh704821 күн бұрын
    • Naval was always second to the air force when it came to production decisions. They were always having to change engines when the desired one was canceled and they were expected to produce aircraft with capabilities which compromised one another. What did those "crusty" admirals do to deserve your criticism? There are so many assumptions made about the officer class of the period which are little more than prejudice.

      @nerdyali4154@nerdyali415420 күн бұрын
    • The Air Ministry was in charge of all aircraft production. They simply thought they knew more about shipborne aircraft than the men who would have to use them. The Navy had to put up with second rate kit until they could get more modern planes from the USA near the end of the war. Nothing to do with crusty old admirals, in fact the Royal Navy had some of the best admirals in the world at this time.

      @philhawley1219@philhawley121914 күн бұрын
  • The Rolls Royce Vulture was an X engine fitted to the Avro Manchester and the Hawker Tornado. It had one major problem. It was crap

    @TheWombat40@TheWombat4021 күн бұрын
  • I once heard this plane described as "origami in metal". Another strangely weird yet appealing air frame. Someday I've got to model one...although there are FEW model kit manufactures that make one.

    @kentbarnes1955@kentbarnes195520 күн бұрын
    • Special Hobby, the Czech firm offer both 1/72 and 1/48 versions, fiddly but buildable.

      @proteusnz99@proteusnz999 күн бұрын
    • Ark Models of Russia makes it in 1/72 scale.

      @lancerevell5979@lancerevell59794 күн бұрын
  • One has to remember that the primary requirement for FAA TSR(torpedo/strike/recon)aircraft such as the swordfish was to be able to lift off the small pre WWII and experimental carriers such as Eagle and Argus hence the high lift biplane layout. We should also remember that the RN had a working night strike doctrine using Swordfish in 1938 some 7 years before the USN could manage that on a wide scale and was widely using ASV by 1942

    @davidmcintyre8145@davidmcintyre814516 күн бұрын
  • The hydraulic fluid bit reminds me of a video on Russian aircraft where it was stated that alcohol comprised a large component of the hydraulic fluid. Of course they drank it...

    @MisterOcclusion@MisterOcclusion21 күн бұрын
    • Ah, the Tu-22's electronics coolant. Alcohol wasn't a large component, it was THE component, 100% ethanol.

      @mfree80286@mfree8028613 күн бұрын
  • I would give 2 thumbs up for the Heart reference 😁

    @andreaslermen2008@andreaslermen20083 күн бұрын
  • The `T` Tail has since proved to be a risky idea. The reason the Swordfish was SO successful is because so much of it was unable to trigger incoming AA and TOO(?) Slow. Just put a Band Aid on the holes, good to go.

    @moosifer3321@moosifer332121 күн бұрын
    • If the Swordfish had to face the teeth of the Japanese fleet in 1941 and her Zero fighters it would have been torn to pieces

      @zoperxplex@zoperxplex21 күн бұрын
    • @@zoperxplex Just like US Aircraft at that time? Taranto, a warning unheeded, ONE YEAR BEFORE? The Stringbag had been participating for over 2yrs. Check out Skynea`s opinion of Japanese AA (Morale Boosters)

      @moosifer3321@moosifer332121 күн бұрын
    • @@moosifer3321 Even the Devastator was a superior aircraft than the Swordfish and that was considered obsolete by the start of the war.

      @zoperxplex@zoperxplex21 күн бұрын
    • @@zoperxplex Remember Midway? How many Biplanes lost against Bismarck. There is a difference between Obsolete and Obsolesence, when in adversity, use what you have - Big shout for Taffy Three and USS ENGLAND (using British Hedgehog/RADAR ) Guessing you are American, good luck with your Politics. Great chat. As to WHO won the war ......American Industry? PS How many Devs are still flying or are they still recovering Sable and Wolverine`s quota?

      @moosifer3321@moosifer332121 күн бұрын
    • @@moosifer3321 Had the German or Italian navies in 1941 been as well equipped in terms of air power as the Japanese navy we wouldn't be discussing Swordfish.

      @zoperxplex@zoperxplex21 күн бұрын
  • Ah yes the Fairey Baccaruda...

    @alan-sk7ky@alan-sk7ky21 күн бұрын
  • I used to work from Aerodrome Way Heston, one of Fairey Aviation`s sites, one of the original Hangers still being present. The Stringbag was probably Fairey`s BIGGEST contributions in WWII. Bring on the Gannet, not proven in Combat, but...? Don`t mention the Fairey (whimp) Battle!!!

    @moosifer3321@moosifer332121 күн бұрын
  • Yes, I did learn something about the Barracuda's narcotizing hydraulic system. Enjoyed the pitch-black humour. Perhaps it is fair(ey) to mention the Gannet, a successful descendant of the Barracuda and Spearfish?

    @OliverSchroeder@OliverSchroeder20 күн бұрын
  • Will you cover the albacore??? It’s one of the planes that is the least talked about and all I have read or watched about it is that it was ok but not as good as the swordfish.

    @Zain-fi@Zain-fi21 күн бұрын
    • it served in the Pacific in USN colours!

      @uingaeoc3905@uingaeoc390521 күн бұрын
    • @@uingaeoc3905 Shhhh! No one is supposed to know about that. Cheers.

      @towgod7985@towgod798521 күн бұрын
  • Looks about as slippery as sandpaper😅

    @metrikmechanik@metrikmechanik21 күн бұрын
  • 25:00 Many WWII aircraft on the Allied side would up like that; the Boulton-Paul Defiant (the turret fighter) wound up as a target tug, the P-70 Nighthawk was the A-20 Havok as a night fighter, the Douglas DC-2 was heavily modified into the B-18 Bolo (and that was before the war) serving as a sub hunter and training bomber during WW II --- the list is endless.

    @MrJohndoakes@MrJohndoakes20 күн бұрын
  • Sadly the FAA eventually started using Grumman's Avenger torpedo bombers in the form of TBM's from lend lease.

    @jollyjohnthepirate3168@jollyjohnthepirate316821 күн бұрын
    • Why sadly? The avenger was a good beast. Not like the SB2C

      @massmike11@massmike1120 күн бұрын
    • But only as a bomber as the Royal Navy torpedos would not fit in the internal bay.

      @johnfisk811@johnfisk81114 күн бұрын
  • Looks like a flying tv station

    @skswig1@skswig121 күн бұрын
  • The Fleet Air Arm in WW2 is famous for having ancient, awkward-looking, ungainly beasts that. arguably, should never have been made. Blackburn Roc and Skua, Gloster Sea Gladiator, Fairey Swordfish and Albacore. Supermarine Walrus. This beast fits in nicely. I think the ugliest of them all was reserved for the post-war turboprop beast. It is amazing that a thing like the Swordfish kept going. But think about this. The Swordfish was introduced in 1936! not 1916!

    @mebeasensei@mebeasensei21 күн бұрын
    • Hey, the Skua wasn't that bad as a dive bomber (it even inexplicably held its own as a fighter early in the war) and the Walrus was excellent for its intended function, even if it was a little awkward looking. Also you missed the other crappy FAA aircraft: the Fulmar and Firefly.

      @nerd1000ify@nerd1000ify21 күн бұрын
  • Can you cover the BTD Destoyer plane?

    @jatanieltesta7508@jatanieltesta750819 күн бұрын
  • As far a British dive bombers are concerned it was the RAF who set against it. The Royal Navy were keen on dive bombing and had the Osprey, Skua, Roc, Swordfish, Shark, Albacore, Fulmar and Firefly built as dive bomber capable and in the Battle of France it was FAA Swordfish, Skuas and Rocs who were dive bombing the German army approaching Dunkirk and their Albacores in the Western Desert did sterling work dive bombing the Italian army and their Swordfish dive bombed the Italian heavy naval shipping oil storage tanks at Taranto at night illuminating them with flares.

    @johnfisk811@johnfisk81114 күн бұрын
  • I hate to say this, but I had to laugh out loud at the final story of the hydraulic fluid containing ether, and the plane gently putting the pilots to sleep before it killed them.

    @raygreenberg6720@raygreenberg672021 күн бұрын
  • I felt sorry for the two blokes in the back. As the pilot slept softly all the way to the crash, the were screaming "WE'RE GOING TO DIE!'

    @mikegosselin2391@mikegosselin239117 күн бұрын
  • Interesting, subscribed.

    @grantmiller6570@grantmiller657021 күн бұрын
  • Problem they had was that while the Swordfish was .... well, really out of date, it was just so damn reliable and a sturdy and stable torpedo platform. Sure it was slow and underarmed and the Swordfish really did need an update, for the previous reasons it was more popular as a torpedo bomber than it's successors, save for when we finally got the Avenger from the Americans, which really was better than anything else we had. Even then we carried on using the Swordfish... the Barracuda... well I think IHLYS is being rather generous here- it wasn't a good plane, and it had, IMHO- a bloated service life. Any plane that KOs it's own pilot isn't a good plane, no matter the cause.

    @stevenread1676@stevenread16769 күн бұрын
  • "Give me a sign!" , dum dada dum, dum dada dum, Barracuda.... "Ah, a sign!"

    @shawnmcauliffe5072@shawnmcauliffe507220 күн бұрын
  • Fairey really was a one-hit wonder with the Swordfish.

    @cdfe3388@cdfe338820 күн бұрын
  • No wonder Barracuda pilots flew with the canopy open. 🤣 Love that they are trying to rebuild one for a museum display.

    @ronaldbyrne3320@ronaldbyrne332020 күн бұрын
  • Oooo...Barracuda! Next up; The Hawker Hart? Can't wait to see what the "radio" has next for us...

    @yuuzyerbrejn9603@yuuzyerbrejn960316 күн бұрын
  • The reason the F/A-18 breaks the rules by having F/A is that it was meant to be two different planes. At one point there was an A-18 Hornet in development to replace the A-7 Corsair II & A-4 Skyhawk (it was competing with an improved A-7 variant); while the F-18 was competing with a navalized F-16 jointly developed by General Dynamics and Vought. Eventually computers got good enough that one set of avionics could do both jobs so the two planes were merged in to one.

    @williammagoffin9324@williammagoffin932419 күн бұрын
  • YAAAAAS, Ultimate Heart song joke...

    @user-je5do6jn2f@user-je5do6jn2f17 күн бұрын
  • They were biplanes for short take off. The Swordfish was contemporary with the spitfire. This thing had gigantic flaps.

    @womble321@womble32120 күн бұрын
  • The naming conventions of the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 and/or RAF are not “LAX”, lax implies that the rules are not adhered to by anyone, the word you are looking for would be “RElaxed” meaning that anyone who comes up with an appropriate name could have it introduced as the given name, please don’t be offended by my comment, I would say the same to anyone.

    @allandavis8201@allandavis820121 күн бұрын
  • You left out Block like the F-16 C/D Block 70/72. What I don't get is why the shoulder mounted wings? Just seems really to me.

    @DavidSiebert@DavidSiebert19 күн бұрын
  • Higher atmospheric temperatures don't so much hurt the engines as hurt the wings. Warmer air is less dense so the wings generate less lift at any given airspeed, and with an engine of marginal performance at altitude the Barracuda just couldn't generate enough lift to get over the mountains reliably. A more powerful engine would have solved this problem of course, as would extended wings, but since neither of these were available the crews suffered losses that they shouldn't have had to sustain in an aircraft that wasn't suitable for the mission profile required. Also: You suggest in the video that the "X" engine - actually the Rolls Royce Vulture - did not have any particular reliability issues. This is the opposite of the truth. The Vulture had significant overheating problems along with lubrication issues that made it too unreliable to continue in service. Amongst other things this led to the redesign of the Avro Manchester (2 Vulture engines) into the Avro Lancaster (4 Merlin engines), and the discontinuation of the Hawker Tornado project in favour of the Hawker Typhoon - and if the Napier Sabre engine of the Typhoon was better than the Vulture that should really seriously tell you something about how bad the Vulture was!

    @vipertwenty249@vipertwenty24915 күн бұрын
    • I think you are confusing the X engine layout of the Exe (like the river) with the similar but much larger Vulture.

      @philhawley1219@philhawley121914 күн бұрын
    • @@philhawley1219 Yes you're right. Learn something every day!

      @vipertwenty249@vipertwenty24914 күн бұрын
  • "We need a plane that can carry 1 1500lb torpedo, or 1500 1lb torpedoes..."

    @teehasheestower@teehasheestower3 күн бұрын
  • Apparently the cooling intake flaps on the Barracuda’s Merlin engine had to be closed in order to reduce drag sufficiently to take off - any delay lead to engine overheating, which must have made being tail end Charlie in the take-off order rather interesting. The Albacore failed to replace the Swordfish mainly because of the Albacore’s engine - the sleeve valve Bristol Taurus - being unreliable, hardly ideal for a single engined naval aircraft. The Bristol Perseus on the Swordfish was by contrast a real sewing machine in its reliability.

    @glennsimpson7659@glennsimpson765917 күн бұрын
    • The Swordfish remained in service for its short takeoff run for small escort carriers in the bad weather of the North Atlantic. Fairey ceased production of the Albacore and ir’s spares to turn to making Barracudas but Blackburn continued to make Swordfish and their spares in their purpose built shadow factory. Once in the air the Albacore could carry more war load further and faster than the Swordfish.

      @johnfisk811@johnfisk81114 күн бұрын
  • ❤ Barracuda by Heart is one of my favorite songs. Check it out if you're into good music from 1977. Wicked Awesome for anyone that loves a really odd time signature, especially drummers. Seriously check it out kids😊

    @mattheide2775@mattheide277521 күн бұрын
  • Narrow-gauge landing gear on a flat-top is often a recipe for disaster. Roy Grumman seemed to be the only aircraft engineer that could buck this trend.

    @user-je5do6jn2f@user-je5do6jn2f17 күн бұрын
    • Wartime FAA pilots I have spoken to rated the Hurricane and Barracuda as the easiest to land on a carrier.

      @johnfisk811@johnfisk81114 күн бұрын
    • @@johnfisk811 Looking at the gear config, it looks like under compression the track widens greatly. Hell on tire tread, but probably aided in stability.

      @mfree80286@mfree8028613 күн бұрын
  • There was a ditty about the barracuda written by some air man during the the war "It weighs 10 tons no front gun and fuck all to rely on" how it went.

    @gregforrester4851@gregforrester485120 күн бұрын
  • Good luck being assigned to Barracuda squadrons.

    @raymondyee2008@raymondyee200815 күн бұрын
  • I believe the US solved the tail problem, by using perforated flaps on the Dauntless Dive Bomber.

    @longrider42@longrider4221 күн бұрын
  • One of those British aircraft that suffered from over ambitious engine programs , that they just couldn't get to work as we where entering "you're pushing it" territory technologically

    @mathewkelly9968@mathewkelly996821 күн бұрын
  • For a really complex but logical nomenclature system, dig into the US Navy aircraft system up until 1960 or so. 😉

    @petesheppard1709@petesheppard170921 күн бұрын
  • "Barracuda" is my ringtone... (the song, not the plane).

    @alancritchley5901@alancritchley590120 күн бұрын
  • Names of aircraft are not named by the manufacturer but named by the military service

    @tanknick22@tanknick2211 күн бұрын
  • the dive brakes got the plane caught in its own prop wash, it's not an uncommon phenomenon when it comes to aircraft designs (sorry I can't name any examples at the moment)

    @buttole@buttole20 күн бұрын
  • Ooh barackuda

    @ajobdunwell2585@ajobdunwell2585Күн бұрын
  • Fairey Battle, Fairey Barracuda, Fairey Firefly, all failures, what else did they make that got a lot of airmen killed??

    @brettcurtis5710@brettcurtis571021 күн бұрын
    • The Battle was a good airframe but too large for one engine. As Fairey told them before it was ordered and recommended it be made as a twin.

      @johnfisk811@johnfisk81114 күн бұрын
  • Lets gooo

    @metrikmechanik@metrikmechanik21 күн бұрын
  • 9:43 'ang on a moment, that's a Battle, completely different aircraft IHYLS... tut.

    @alan-sk7ky@alan-sk7ky21 күн бұрын
  • It has such a peculiar wing set up for a fuselage that shape, makes me laugh a little

    @lolguy480@lolguy48015 күн бұрын
  • But they also had TV for watching underway! See, those antennas?! 🤪

    @kiereluurs1243@kiereluurs124318 күн бұрын
  • 3:05 I laughed. I admit it.

    @MaximGhost@MaximGhost7 күн бұрын
  • Imagine steaming in on Bismarck in that crate....Fairey Gannett next time if it pleases...ugly as my arse but a shed load of interest....ta! ✌️

    @brianford8493@brianford849320 күн бұрын
  • Can anyone say if a rear gunner in a Naval bomber ever had any job to do?

    @uingaeoc3905@uingaeoc390521 күн бұрын
  • 18 = 118, F111 was last to use the 100 number up front.

    @malcolmlewis5860@malcolmlewis586021 күн бұрын
  • "Ooo oo Barracuda". That's funny right there, I don't care who you are.

    @tmutant@tmutant20 күн бұрын
  • Heart was my 1st concert, Radio City Music Hall, NYC, 1979

    @s4shop@s4shop21 күн бұрын
  • The model box art did this limp fish more justice than its combat record ever could...

    @user-je5do6jn2f@user-je5do6jn2f17 күн бұрын
  • "Fun" fact: The song by Heart had nothing to do with the plane, but they did rip off the main riff from Led Zeppelin, who were British, so

    @stephenmeier4658@stephenmeier465821 күн бұрын
  • Lord, they were homely airplanes.

    @Paladin1873@Paladin187321 күн бұрын
  • 15:40 If Supermarine was making those in 1940 then the Battle of Britain would have been a bit one sided.

    @ABrit-bt6ce@ABrit-bt6ce5 күн бұрын
  • 11:34 Did the pilot really sit that low?

    @davidwoods7408@davidwoods740821 күн бұрын
  • The Avenger was not stressed for dive-bombing and is not really comparable to a Barracuda.

    @dmunro9076@dmunro90766 күн бұрын
  • Nice video. It's pronounced Bolt-un Paul btw. Not Booolton Paul. :-)

    @jamesdeath3477@jamesdeath347718 күн бұрын
  • It's got a fat fuselage. Was it a crew of three and six passengers??

    @irishrover4658@irishrover46582 күн бұрын
  • The Supermarine Seagull had to be renamed as the Supermarine Walrus. At that time it was regarded as bad luck to mention a Seagull on His Majesties Ships

    @ianallan8005@ianallan800521 күн бұрын
    • There were two Supermarine Seagull flying boats. One which first flew in 1921 and the other which first flew in 1948. Neither of these was the Walrus which was a totally different aircraft.

      @Richard.Allsop@Richard.Allsop21 күн бұрын
    • @@Richard.Allsop the first Supermarine Seagull was for the Australian Navy, the RN ordered the same but changed its name

      @ianallan8005@ianallan800521 күн бұрын
    • @@ianallan8005 I stand corrected!👍

      @Richard.Allsop@Richard.Allsop19 күн бұрын
  • Weren't they going to call the spitfire the SHREW 😂wot wot . That will put it up em. Strike fear in their heart's ...SHREW it is😂😂

    @eoincostello4634@eoincostello463421 күн бұрын
  • Special Hobby sold more units than Fairey could...

    @user-je5do6jn2f@user-je5do6jn2f17 күн бұрын
  • Actually, the “Tomcat” name was suggested for the F6F. Since the name received negative feedback because of its “suggestive” connotation, Leroy Grumman himself (who thought the negative feedback was completely ridiculous) then penned the name Hellcat for the F6F as a retort to the feedback received from the WPB.

    @ikekelly3157@ikekelly315721 күн бұрын
KZhead