The Extreme Solution Germany Found to Destroy Dangerous Enemy Drones

2023 ж. 21 Жел.
923 720 Рет қаралды

Welcome back to the Fluctus Channel. In this captivating episode, we embarked on an informative journey through the world of modern air defense technologies. We began by discussing the evolution of counter-drone strategies and delved into the sophisticated systems developed by companies like Rheinmetall, including the Skynex and Oerlikon Skyranger.
Fluctus is a website and KZhead channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our KZhead channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Пікірлер
  • The Banshee is made in Alberta Canada. Meggett Canada use to own the drone target business before it was sold to Quanti-Q of Britain. They make the Rattler missile drone, Mosquito helicopter drone and a high speed boat drone. The boat drone was adapted by the Ukrainian Navy and taken to new levels as the Sea Baby. Ukrainians are so smart and brave they deserve our support. As for all the critics it's all in the ammo and I would bet on the drones will or would get shot down regardless of angles of attack as this gun knows where all the drones are at any time as the radar sees 360 degrees and the ammo is smart and shoots like buckshot. Drones don't stand a chance with this beast on the field.

    @annetteshoniker3132@annetteshoniker31324 ай бұрын
  • *They are using Shaped Charges to push both molten copper and hard projectiles! Smart Germans!*

    @johnslugger@johnslugger2 ай бұрын
  • Your show is very captivating and informative. Kudos to the music supervisor or composer. Very effective use of music. Too bad there's no mention of who it is.

    @renebrossard@renebrossard3 ай бұрын
  • Excelente vídeo, parabéns de Portugal.

    @antoniomachado6969@antoniomachado69692 ай бұрын
  • *The enemy can throw anything at you but the most important thing in modern warfere is having a very strong defense counter measure.*

    @apakansaja8505@apakansaja85054 ай бұрын
    • get a job mate !

      @__logan__duvalier__@__logan__duvalier__4 ай бұрын
    • Any defense can be overwhelmed by shear numbers - the big advantage that Russia has over the entire NATO block of nations is that it can greatly exceed the West in the production of artillery shells (and there is no real defense against a barrage of artillery shells other than an offensive capability that can suppress or knock out the source of the artillery fire - Ukrainian military units are currently down to rationing the use of artillery shells at ten a day when attempting to respond to a Russian artillery strike).

      @TheSulross@TheSulross4 ай бұрын
    • ​@@TheSulrossэто полная чушь , если бы россия была такая могучая по производству артиллерийских снарядов , тогда БЫ она не КЛЯНЧИЛА артиллерийские снаряды у нищего Ирана и нищего КНДР. Копито ? 🇩🇪

      @arthurarthur2165@arthurarthur21654 ай бұрын
    • @@arthurarthur2165 Yeah, well, it's been keeping up a steady, superior artillery barrage capability for many months now. Western security sources have conceded they've been taken by surprise by Russia's ability to keep up a manufacturing supply of new shells.

      @TheSulross@TheSulross4 ай бұрын
    • ​@@TheSulross то , что россия получила миллион артиллерийских снарядов и сотни баллистических ракет от КНДР - признали сами руссофашисты . А обломки баллистических ракет, корейского производства, обнаружены в Киеве после обстрела руссофашистами жилых районов Киева и Харькова. И это факт.

      @arthurarthur2165@arthurarthur21654 ай бұрын
  • The new air defense systems appear to be quite effective. They're certainly needed in this new age of drone combat. 😊😊😊

    @garymiller5937@garymiller59374 ай бұрын
    • As long as the drones fly in a nice tight formation. I have yet to see how effective it is if they come in willy nilly. That cannon cannot shoot in two directions at the same time.

      @johnkochen7264@johnkochen72644 ай бұрын
    • @@johnkochen7264 Most of these drones like Shahed or Lancet are pretty slow with around 100km/h. That 35mm cannon can engage up to 6km. So if it has line of sight it can engage for 3-4 minutes till the drones arrive which should be more than enough.

      @jackchid6040@jackchid60404 ай бұрын
    • New? Its just like the gepard was in 1980

      @dirk-jandekrijger7303@dirk-jandekrijger73033 ай бұрын
  • Sehr Gut!! Wir brauchen es jetzt!!

    @anthonyboomer641@anthonyboomer6414 ай бұрын
  • Drones must now go from mothership to self-destruct. And it must also act as a repeater from the mother ship. Then you don't have to use expensive satellites.

    @junl6748@junl67484 ай бұрын
    • But they can be jammed more easily that way because there are more opportunity for detection.

      @robertpeters9438@robertpeters94383 ай бұрын
  • In future Tanks will need to move with such vehicles in groups.. the threat to tanks from drones is so severe, more so then Anti Tank Missiles.

    @lingth@lingth2 ай бұрын
  • Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit für das deutsche Vaterland!

    @user-pe6fl5rh8y@user-pe6fl5rh8y3 ай бұрын
  • there is also the English AJAX and the French EBRC JAGUAR CTAS 40 mm

    @LOLOVAL-os3pq@LOLOVAL-os3pq3 ай бұрын
  • X ray top efficient yes but all depend how lasting a shut because it is easy to know where it come from for the enemys.

    @lucienhoule5948@lucienhoule5948Ай бұрын
  • Die "Oerlikon Skyranger Gun" wurde bekanntlich in der Schweiz von Oerlikon Bührle entwickelt, das heute zusammen mit der Contraves AG als Oerlikon Contraves AG Teil der deutschen Rheinmetall Defence ist.

    @elsap75@elsap754 ай бұрын
    • True, that was a smart takeover by Rheinmetall. And in loose sense, skynex is the evolution of the Gepard, building on the succes of the Oerlikon gun. I am still waiting for the day Americans get the pronunciation right for Rheinmetall...

      @gerlachsieders4578@gerlachsieders45784 ай бұрын
    • But did they just design the Oerlikon gun or all of the system that goes around it to create Skynex/ranger? I though Oerlikon just designed the barrel and action and Rheinmetall designed everything else. Not sure if that includes the timed flak ammo.

      @MostlyPennyCat@MostlyPennyCat4 ай бұрын
    • ​@@MostlyPennyCatNur die Oerlikon-Kanone 35mm vom Gepard wurde in der Schweiz entwickelt. Schon im 2. WK haben die Schweizer ca. 20.000x 20mm Oerlikonkanonen bis 1943 an die Achsenmächte geliefert. Die 30mm MK vom Skynec/Skyramger ist wieder in Deutschland entwickelt. Die Schweizer kannst wegen ihrer angeblichen Neutralität nicht mehr als Waffenlieferant ernsthaft gebrauchen. Die liefern noch nicht mal Munition am das verteidigende Land.

      @WahrsagermithoherQuote@WahrsagermithoherQuote4 ай бұрын
    • @@WahrsagermithoherQuote Sorry, the translate button just broke down... 😩

      @MostlyPennyCat@MostlyPennyCat4 ай бұрын
    • i am Swiss and seeing many swiss companies, being it Oerlikon or SIG or .... it pains me to see these jewels companies and their technology sold abroad.

      @tomcat9112@tomcat91124 ай бұрын
  • would also make a nasty anti personal weapon

    @kylexu227@kylexu2273 ай бұрын
  • What you called the Hercules was actually the much older Ajax.

    @davekisor1486@davekisor1486Ай бұрын
  • and GOALKEEPER of THALES , laser HELMA-P ( France ) !

    @LOLOVAL-os3pq@LOLOVAL-os3pqАй бұрын
  • If anything its the ammunition thats doing most of the work, explosive ammo, i wouldn't like to see the hit rate without that type of ammunition .

    @martyndyson9501@martyndyson95013 ай бұрын
    • the ammunition alone is nothing without the gun, the carrier, the personal and the software on board. this all has to be optimized to get the best results. with "just explosive ammo" you can not reach the effect of such complex systems. and for the facts: this is not what you call explosive ammo.

      @OiDepp@OiDepp3 ай бұрын
    • the Rheinmetall AHEAD is not explosive but air burst

      @zhufortheimpaler4041@zhufortheimpaler40412 ай бұрын
    • The ammo is not smart. It's only self destroying beyond the target with a timed fuse to not cause damage on the ground.

      @eric-janh.ted.8880@eric-janh.ted.88802 ай бұрын
  • 군집드론 100 대가 공격해오면 감당 가능할까?

    @raincho7809@raincho7809Ай бұрын
  • Does this also work with the PS4 or PS5 gamepad?... asking for a friend.

    @GRS4HlK2@GRS4HlK2Ай бұрын
  • That is an extreemly expensive solution to an extreemly cheap problem...

    @gezalesko3813@gezalesko38134 ай бұрын
    • Think before shit posting. It’s cheaper than your electricity generation systems being blown up.

      @TesterAnimal1@TesterAnimal14 ай бұрын
    • @@TesterAnimal1 you can buy about 150-200 electricity generators for the price of a single "drone silution" of the military industrial complex...

      @gezalesko3813@gezalesko38134 ай бұрын
    • you got it in a nutshell !

      @__logan__duvalier__@__logan__duvalier__4 ай бұрын
  • hitting drones beyond 600 meters can be very hard or 400 meters

    @theSpicyHam@theSpicyHam3 ай бұрын
  • Thee cannon probably has a longer than a laser and isn't. Affected by weather.

    @ramonpunsalang3397@ramonpunsalang33972 ай бұрын
    • it hase 3 diferent Systems and just saing german know how to build the best you gett ..... SEE the gepard system 50 years old ,best defence for Drones

      @MrKilper@MrKilper2 ай бұрын
  • Thank you . ( 2024 / Jan / 02 )

    @ronaldwhite1730@ronaldwhite17304 ай бұрын
  • And now erratic moving drones instead of a static cloud smiling at the camera at zero windspeed.

    @eric-janh.ted.8880@eric-janh.ted.88803 ай бұрын
    • skyranger is C-RAM capable, it can engage and destroy moving and jinking drones without problems

      @zhufortheimpaler4041@zhufortheimpaler40412 ай бұрын
    • Still I think it's only that effective to static or ballistic (predictable) trajectories.

      @eric-janh.ted.8880@eric-janh.ted.88802 ай бұрын
    • @@eric-janh.ted.8880 dude the system is in CWIS use for 20 years and tested extensively. you can shoot down incoming mortar rounds and artillery grenades

      @zhufortheimpaler4041@zhufortheimpaler40412 ай бұрын
  • All 2 expensive, laser systems are the future

    @Psxvince@Psxvince3 ай бұрын
    • laser is not always better it can be hardly effected by weather like fog rain clouds dust smoke - all present on the battlefield.

      @OiDepp@OiDepp3 ай бұрын
    • actually laser CAN countered by material, so you will still need a mix of both

      @nextinimanai2876@nextinimanai28762 ай бұрын
  • Wow amazing...

    @AdelaUntalasco@AdelaUntalasco4 ай бұрын
  • Gepard noch mal neu auflegen..besser ist das !

    @class77sncb@class77sncb4 ай бұрын
    • nein, allein der Turm des Gepard wiegt 11to und er braucht zwei Kanonen für die gleiche Firepower. Die Entwicklung geht weiter.

      @augustiner3821@augustiner38214 ай бұрын
  • I Think The Military Use Too Much Acronyms, or ITTMUTMA

    @Chaudapeau@Chaudapeau3 ай бұрын
  • And at night do they see the new Russian drones painted black with very low infrared tracking? I doubt. The Russians are preferring jamming systems on the front, in fact reports of Ukrainian drone attacks have significantly decreased recently.

    @trumpforever6706@trumpforever67063 ай бұрын
  • Only effective if the drone swarm presents itself to the business end of the weapon system. Unfortunately, drone swarms swarm; they attack a target from all points of the compass, simultaneously. The intention is to envelop and overwhelm. This leaves a directional weapon system, like Rheinmetall's, vulnerable.

    @Dunbar0740@Dunbar07404 ай бұрын
    • How much time will a drone need to cover a range of 1-2 km because that is the time Skyranger has to shot them down. So spread them out as much as you want. And this is still a hypothetical because there is not one drone swarm system available yet.

      @thomasprogli3372@thomasprogli33724 ай бұрын
    • It assumes the threat is coming from the sky, 200 feet off the ground in a tightly packed cluster it can engage with ease. If the drones come in NOE from multiple directions 10 feet off the ground, it can't depress to engage without taking out it's own personnel.

      @kinkade6710@kinkade67102 ай бұрын
  • Like the drones will line up in a 10 feet by 6 feet grid and remain stationary to be shot down? Rheinmetall needs to work on its scenario design.

    @winstongludovatz111@winstongludovatz1114 ай бұрын
    • Hey genius - you know this is basically a flak system don't you? Flak on super-steroids. Radar location and predictive vector tracking, placing a 35mm cannon shell in the vicinity of where it is going to be within the flight time of the projectile. Proximity detonation and shrapnel radiating in all directions, only requiring one or two shards to cause critical no-flight damage to a plastic drone. See what can be achieved when you stay awake at school?

      @ateleskier7066@ateleskier70664 ай бұрын
    • It was just a demonstration.

      @abraham2172@abraham21723 ай бұрын
    • You took the words out of my mouth.

      @clydelouis5956@clydelouis59563 ай бұрын
    • i thought same thing, what happens in a multi drone multiple angles attack from front and rear ? maybe they do not want to show everything, people get ideas.

      @user-op3zf6if9i@user-op3zf6if9i3 ай бұрын
    • This demonstration took place three years ago.

      @randuru@randuru3 ай бұрын
  • However, the Nike Hercules can deliver a bigger punch. Like a nuclear warhead! Go 24Q20 class of ‘73! Fort Bliss, TX. Air Defense Artillery (ADA)!

    @DG-sn2js@DG-sn2js2 ай бұрын
  • Gj this was super interesting guys

    @VishnuAi@VishnuAi4 ай бұрын
  • Get a load of the Danish soldier's helmets @ 5:42 & a few minutes later ! Wow !

    @billotto602@billotto6024 ай бұрын
  • Always first to reply after seconds uploading

    @dougxto6603@dougxto66034 ай бұрын
  • Een aantal langs de grenzen zetten samen met nl radar

    @rvanrijswijk6103@rvanrijswijk61032 ай бұрын
  • Bizim Türk yazımı Korkut’u almışlar biz yaptık diye övünüyorlar komik 😂

    @fatihacar5817@fatihacar5817Ай бұрын
  • Waarom niet patrols vliegen met camera

    @rvanrijswijk6103@rvanrijswijk61032 ай бұрын
  • It's terrible the New War!

    @1966camillis@1966camillis4 ай бұрын
    • Yes, but less terrible with these systems protecting cities.

      @abraham2172@abraham21723 ай бұрын
  • Anno 1980s you mean....

    @harrison00xXx@harrison00xXx3 ай бұрын
  • man...who wants to go stand in the Avenger box on the back of the Humvee.......guy needs sunglasses

    @kinkade6710@kinkade67102 ай бұрын
  • Methode kam schon vor Jahren ins Spiel.

    @hansjoachimvoigt1075@hansjoachimvoigt10752 ай бұрын
  • It’s the xbox 360 controller for me

    @petrgusev8798@petrgusev87983 күн бұрын
  • Avec une porte de 4 km ils vont pas faire peur a grand monde🤣😂

    @redbone4458@redbone44584 ай бұрын
  • This should not be difficult.. make small missiles,. 10 cm? Connected to optical sensors and a 360 radar. Done

    @baldis12@baldis123 ай бұрын
  • Die Sebmord-Drohnen fliegen ganz schnell schwer zu schiessen

    @hoangha2@hoangha24 ай бұрын
    • Die sind nicht schnell

      @imbiss69bronko@imbiss69bronko4 ай бұрын
  • 우리나라도내년총선에서압승하여국방비100배1000배올려서독일처럼첨단무기생산해야되겠어요.국방비도찍당이반으로삭감하니뭐하겠어요

    @user-wu3eb6lz4u@user-wu3eb6lz4u4 ай бұрын
  • With AI at the helm on both sides what then

    @IONACOMPUTERS@IONACOMPUTERS4 ай бұрын
    • ruZZia developing AI? 🤣

      @ateleskier7066@ateleskier70664 ай бұрын
  • If the drone have in range but i expect that system are priority target to swarn drones😂

    @pedrohpires6608@pedrohpires66084 ай бұрын
  • Don’t look at Bangladesh... I noticed everyone is here individually........

    @brillbond7878@brillbond78784 ай бұрын
  • problem is its cheaper to make drones than destroy them. That math doesn't fit (yet)

    @DiegoTeixeira@DiegoTeixeira3 ай бұрын
  • Niente sottotitoli, ciao

    @giovannirusso8853@giovannirusso8853Ай бұрын
  • we saw how effective the Patriot is VS Russian flying washing machines 🤣

    @8100rpm@8100rpm3 ай бұрын
  • Are we going to ignore the fact dude was controlling a drone with an Xbox controller @ 1:55

    @DP-fk3es@DP-fk3es4 ай бұрын
  • ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

    @TechMilitary901@TechMilitary9014 ай бұрын
  • o custo benefício para a Rússia seria melhor atacar aos países que estão apoiando a Ucrânia nesta guerra com armas e soldados do que continuar com essa guerra simétrica no front, é muito fácil para os aliados que toda guerra contra a Rússia fique no front de suas fronteiras, sustentando uma guerra da qual não sofram os efeitos colaterais.

    @saulocrema2275@saulocrema22754 ай бұрын
  • Via satellieten

    @rvanrijswijk6103@rvanrijswijk61032 ай бұрын
  • man sollte nicht durch den deutschen Titel suggerieren, dies sei ein Beitrag in deutscher Sprache, wenn er das nicht ist!

    @NielsKanne@NielsKanne4 ай бұрын
    • Die Titel werden Automatisch Übersetzt

      @philcitizen4671@philcitizen46712 ай бұрын
  • La germania andra deindustrializzando, anche i tecnici dovranno andare all'estero... forse in america forse in russia forse in cina...

    @davidegiordano6993@davidegiordano69934 ай бұрын
    • 😂 Bro das steckt in unseren Blut

      @Kiker0077@Kiker0077Ай бұрын
  • Drones are much cheaper, you need to build hundreds of vehicles to stop them

    @ersen.mheim42@ersen.mheim424 ай бұрын
    • If you have built the platform it counts ammo vs drone. Ammo is cheaper than the drones.

      @To.Si.Ma.@To.Si.Ma.4 ай бұрын
  • Teuer und hochkompliziert, gegen billige Drohnen. Man braucht spezielle kleine billige Maschinengewehre für die Infanterie, zur Abwehr der Drohnen.

    @kallebraun7380@kallebraun73804 ай бұрын
    • gibt es ja auch, schauen Sie mal nach "Natter". Sehen Sie alles als verbundene Systeme, dann versteht man besser die Funktion eines einzelnen Systems.

      @augustiner3821@augustiner38214 ай бұрын
    • Die bieten nicht genug Schutz. Außerdem kannst du nicht etliche Soldaten für diese Maschinengewehre abbestellen, du brauchst die für die Front.

      @abraham2172@abraham21723 ай бұрын
    • @@abraham2172 Mein Eindruck: Im Westen werden viel zu teure System entwickelt, den Anbietern geht es nur um den Gewinn. Im Osten sind die viel effektiver, die bauen billiger und mindestens gleichwertige System, da müssen wir auch hin wenn wir den angelaufenen WK3 gewinnen wollen. Kleine billige effektive System. Die Amis haben mit ihren hochkomplizierten Systemen, Flugzeugträger, bisher nur die dritte Welt erfolgreich bombardiert. Eine Feuerprobe mit technisch gleichwertigen Gegner steht noch aus. Wenn das passiert, werden die eine Abreibung kriegen und ganz schnell ihre Grenzen sehen. Aber dann haben die nichts mehr außer Atomwaffen, denn die teuren Träger und anderen Systemwaffen werden dann kaputt sein.

      @kallebraun7380@kallebraun73803 ай бұрын
  • CIWS:) Nough said, with Radar... 4.5k rnds a min:) Anything else is a gimmick:) LOL

    @iutrteiusakljdsaj8576@iutrteiusakljdsaj85764 ай бұрын
    • no, depite being fairly powerful, that is a comparatively dumb system, throwing tons small caliber of ammunition towards the target, whereas some tempered round of the Skynex do the same job. And its obvious, there is a considerable difference in the range between a 20 mm and a 30/35mm ammo. To find that system superior, you really have to be a fanboy.

      @augustiner3821@augustiner38214 ай бұрын
  • ❤❤❤❤。❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

    @user-ko6jm7sb9t@user-ko6jm7sb9t4 ай бұрын
  • But wait! That ant at the bottom right of the screen at 15:16 is a top secret Nano Tech piece of equipment that is surveilling the testing of these new weapons, and acts as a target finder and coordinator for russian air and artillery pieces. Fortunately, I made this all up - the russians are too backward to develop and deploy such advanced technology!

    @ERSCAUS@ERSCAUS3 ай бұрын
  • مساء الخير &**

    @abwdwwf@abwdwwf4 ай бұрын
  • Gli A50 awac russi scovano tutti i radar e batterie contraeree e fanno partire i kinzhal e puoi dire ciao ciao ai tuoi carrarmatini

    @damrong.1118@damrong.11184 ай бұрын
  • 15:14 look at the size of ants down right hand side.....looks like pony

    @user-ol2es6oo9x@user-ol2es6oo9x3 ай бұрын
  • funny how this reinmetall system came up today and i was reading and article how the same anti drone system got destroyed by a lancet today 🤣🤣🤣 damn google algorithm

    @8100rpm@8100rpm3 ай бұрын
    • Das ändert nichts

      @Kiker0077@Kiker0077Ай бұрын
  • why not make a drone with wheels ? they can just take them of a toy lol . instead they build a launcher vehicle so that the weapon company still gets millions bruh

    @julznartey@julznartey4 ай бұрын
  • remember. drone have more twice speed rather than jet fighter

    @adilalfala2573@adilalfala25734 ай бұрын
    • 🤣 Most modern fighter jets can top Mach 2. Just out of interest, which drones can fly at Mach 4?

      @ateleskier7066@ateleskier70664 ай бұрын
  • @user-bf1ne6iv6o@user-bf1ne6iv6o4 ай бұрын
  • A little bit late, all orders goes to US. Lockheed Martin has record orders.

    @andrehoensbroek1@andrehoensbroek13 ай бұрын
  • あっ L90/35機関砲に直接Rつけてる。 当たり前だけど、きちんとしてる。

    @mysygisun3335@mysygisun33354 ай бұрын
  • Dream is more powerful than real! Little Germany!

    @danchak499@danchak4994 ай бұрын
    • whrere do you sit in your armchailr?

      @augustiner3821@augustiner38214 ай бұрын
  • Ein Volk Eine Nation Eine Kommentarsektion

    @emergcon@emergcon4 ай бұрын
  • It's great they can hit drone swarms, but if the swarm is spread further apart, the weapon would need to move around to shoot it, making it not very effective.

    @jhadj@jhadj4 ай бұрын
    • Very nice assumption and generalization. Or were you an engineer on this system? Because not only is it capable of engaging targets back to back but its AHEAD ammo means that it can easily cover a huge amount of airspace with a small amount of ammo. 0:05 Each system comprises of 6 35mm autocannons, a radar unit and a command module. 6 guns each at 1000 round a minute is 6000 rounds per minute so it has plenty of firepower to shoot down a "swarm" even though they do not exist. We have yet to see any weapon system that can accurately deliver or autonomously direct 50 or more drones at the same time. The US is the only country currently that has shown it’s able to do this back in 2016. *It’s called the replicator program*

      @Austin-cx2xe@Austin-cx2xe4 ай бұрын
    • FAFO 😂

      @sevenravens@sevenravens4 ай бұрын
    • Most of these drones are pretty slow, so the system with a range of 6km has several minutes to shoot down the swarm.

      @jackchid6040@jackchid60404 ай бұрын
    • Shut Up Ali you don't have any knowing

      @imbiss69bronko@imbiss69bronko4 ай бұрын
    • …and you assume that professional engineers have not considered such basic ideas as yours because…? 😂

      @nielstenbrink@nielstenbrink3 ай бұрын
  • Ich hoffe , das der Boxer auch in die Bundeswehr kommt. Denn Deutschland ist bekannt dafür, das wir gute Waffen herstellen, aber meistens nur für den Export!!!!🙄

    @djfade8144@djfade81444 ай бұрын
  • Krieg stoppen

    @lehrerteubert@lehrerteubert10 күн бұрын
  • If the system you are using is more expensive to run and maintain then the drones you are guarding against.. You have lost the War...

    @AdstarAPAD@AdstarAPAD4 ай бұрын
    • For sure some bulets are not expensive than a drone.

      @flncrs7012@flncrs70124 ай бұрын
    • Then you don't understand the role of drones in combat. If a drone is directing enemy fire onto financially and strategically valuable assets, then the drone needs to be removed regardless of the cost. This 'missile/weapon vs drone cost' comparison is just lazy thinking.

      @ateleskier7066@ateleskier70664 ай бұрын
  • 8 drones hovering in formation!!!!! Wow what a feat!!! BUT 8 DRONES AT 80MILES AN HOUR IN SCATTER MODE??????????????????????????????????????????????????

    @dogdooish@dogdooish4 ай бұрын
    • 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 US Clowns

      @frankbock211@frankbock2113 ай бұрын
  • He sounded just like Macrombe haha like my spelling😢

    @einosiirila7093@einosiirila70932 ай бұрын
  • 6:00 fart

    @augurelite@augurelite4 ай бұрын
  • Echt ? 🤗🤑🤪😉🪩🔮🪬🪟🪞

    @superabbasalmani6079@superabbasalmani60792 ай бұрын
  • No adversary attacking will bunch up there drones like a flock of 🦆🦆🦆, they will approach the enemy with decoys, overwatch/ spotters, direct and flanking attack formation, electronic waveform, jamming counter measure's, All above Controlled by Autonomous AI ( no man in the middle)

    @Joe-jv5mm@Joe-jv5mm4 ай бұрын
    • 😂😂😂😂😂😂

      @frankbock211@frankbock2113 ай бұрын
    • Offensichtlich hast du keine Ahnung

      @Mysteriiox@Mysteriiox3 ай бұрын
    • Nein You don't want a serious war with the Germans

      @jessef88@jessef88Күн бұрын
  • Hid and sik

    @rvanrijswijk6103@rvanrijswijk61032 ай бұрын
  • нихуя сё кино какое что в действии

    @user-ju7bx8hc7k@user-ju7bx8hc7k4 ай бұрын
  • Doesn't know the difference between C-Ram and CIWS

    @daz1598@daz15984 ай бұрын
  • price for municion pleas

    @donotshootimatourist6748@donotshootimatourist6748Ай бұрын
  • ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

    @user-ko6jm7sb9t@user-ko6jm7sb9t4 ай бұрын
KZhead