Rapid Fire Crossbows - Medieval and Modern
Technology changes, circumstances change, but basically people do not. Early humans made art and beautifully crafted objects just as we do now and in the case of these two very different crossbows, they are separated by 400 years and technologically very different but the thinking behind them was very similar, almost identical.
We wanted it in 1603 and we wanted it in 2023.
Are the bows 'the same'? Clearly not, but the similarities are very striking. Let's have a look.
I now have a Patreon page where you can sign up to see bonus films, build blogs, behind the scenes and loads more stuff and just finishing a step by step build of a ballestrino (assassins) crossbow / todsworkshop
For budget medieval replicas of fantastic accuracy and value todcutler.com/collections
For commissions and custom work todsworkshop.com
For merch todsworkshop.creator-spring.com
For those who enjoyed Arrows vs Armour todtodeschini.com
Magazine fed 120lbsw longbow - tested • Tod's 120lb Medieval L...
Who would use a magazine fed longbow? • Who would use the Inst...
Jorg Spraves channel can be found here / @slingshotchannel
Let's talk units.....I live in the UK and although we were supposed to have gone Metric in 1973, we still haven't shaken off the old world so most of us work in a mixture of the Metric and Imperial units....Sorry. Also the chronograph is in feet per second, but I convert it later to actually work out the Joules as those are my preferred units for energy. Sorry for the mess - sums up the UK really.
Just for the record, I built my own house. Plasterboard is in metric and is 1.2m x 2.4m and plywood is in Imperial at 1.22m x 2.44m so every ply board has to be cut to make a timber framed house if you want the plasterboard to line up - go figure.......
I love this video and could not agree more with all the conclusions! Greetings from the Shot Show in Vegas.
Good to see you jeoge
Come by the archery range Jorg!
Your laugh never fails to bring me joy, keep up the great work good man.
Can't wait for the Interceptor @Slingshotchannel
Don't forget to visit our Tactical Gimp leather suits stand, it's close to yours and we know you germans love these It's got zippers all over, even in the back
The latch crossbow seems like the same idea as a modern, low powered, concealed carry handgun. People always argue over stopping power and ballistics but sometimes you just want something that's convenient to use while being just inconvenient enough to get shot by.
Nicely put
And a tiny little 22 caliber is infinitely more effective than the desert eagle you left at home because carrying it is a bitch.
The other thing to consider is the border reivers were mainly raiding on either side side of the Scottish border regularly so a bow like this would be useful since you could load or fire it while mounted on handed and as raiders you generally don't run into guys decked out to fight if you can help it. So the lower power wouldn't be to much a problem in that context.
There’s a joke response to people who say .22 is too small of a caliber, “point to the place on your body you wouldn’t mind getting shot by a .22”. It’s the same with this crossbow.
The better analogy might be a carbine IMO. Reevers were not exactly civilian, more like state sponsored banditry, so I doubt concealing was the main use. Rather ease of use, tactical flexibility, and general lightness.
Tod was just innocently sitting there, contemplating his collection of medieval crossbows, as he does. But then the Adder bow began to whisper to him, calling in the back of his mind... _"You should show someone their features."_
in a german accent, obviously
Honestly, for a civil usage, the latchet crossbow sounds just about perfect. What i'm thinking of is for example home defence, where you dont expect a heavily armoured knight to attack you, but rather a few outlaws or whatever. And there, it would definitely be beneficial to be able to shoot quicker, even if it comes at a cost to deadliness. It doesnt really matter if you kill with every single shot, as long as you can either get a few warning shots or a nasty wound, that should be enough to make the attackers change their mind. Plus, it is easy to use, pretty portable, probably quite simple to maintain/store, and you dont have any detachable parts to bother you in one way or the other.
The border reivers are know for quite light and limited armour.
Plus, if a few villagers gather together at the town gates, that flurry of bolts, no matter how small or short ranged, would make it a pretty daunting task to close to melee. Half a dozen bolts every 2-3 seconds, no raider is moving up that quickly from the outbuildings to the town gate.
At Andreas - my gut feeling is that you are right on pretty much all counts, but those with combat experience would be far better to comment than me.
Chinese repeating crossbow is best for that. 10+ bolts that can be shot at one every 1 or two seconds, reloads quite quickly too.
I was thinking the same thing. The latchet bow looks really good for an untrained person to use. Maybe it's like how people own a shotgun.
You should try making a magazine for that one. I'd love to see that.
I was just about to comment the same thing!
Same
Seems like it would be hard to mount with the way the mechanism works.
Possible but tricky, but a bit busy for something so speculative
Alofs reloading magazine, crossbow-style? kzhead.info/sun/m7KCm8eZb51niIk/bejne.html
Love to see Joerg's crazy inventions hitting the mainstream!
You could send him back in time and change history haha
he will show you its features😄
I remember watching Joerg making the prototype of that crossbow years ago 😊
FEATURES!
@@MonkeyJedi99, let me show you its...
Joerg made this for 400 years ago 🤔
I thought about trying to say it, but there is only one and I would have looked daft
The 400-year-old design is such a lovely example of engineering (and Tod's craft). "Fun, war, civil defence?" That sounds like a great description of this channel.
I still find that clip of 20 Joe's blasting out a hail of arrows impressive, hilarious and terrifying at the same time 😂
the way you say Landsknecht has forever been hilarious: you're basically saying "land's snail/national snail". Anyway, I love the dagger and am considering getting another :D
I know - I try and try, but I keep forgetting, but at least it amuses you rather than offends you
If Jorge Sprave had been born in the middle ages I expect he would have invented plywood *and* weaponized it. He's a mad genius. I really love your craftsmanship Todd. Just beautiful work.
Roman shields are plywood
He would invent gold rubber and conquere the Europe
He'd be the friendliest warlord
LOL! 😆@@StonesSticksBones
He did. Read the Bonaccorso manuscript
As a descendant of those Border Reivers, I am sure that my ancestors would have used the Adder, had it been available to them. They were a practical people if nothing else.
Adder on paper looks like fantastic example of LTL weapon. It prolly wont kill unless you hit in the neck, or face. But on the other hand it goes pretty fast and will hurt even when hit just in extremities. As such I think it also deserves this "rethink one's options" kind of thingie. Also that footage of Joe with several other shots of himself in same screen... Sounds almost like a damn M60 over here.😆👍
I bet there'd be a huge market for a Todd Cutler latchet bow with s "medieval style" magazine. No modern materials - a bow which could well have been built back in the medieval period, but unaccountably wasn't.
Indeed. Though for all we know it may have existed and just not survived or been noticed in the archaeology or records yet. Though I think ultimately it probably didn't - if you really want a magazine fed system it is going to be put on the slightly larger crossbow IMO - the added bulk for the magazine makes that smaller easier to carry crossbow suddenly just as awkward to transport and carry as the bigger one anyway, so you might as well have the more effective weapon and just build in the goats foot. Though I expect I'd absolutely enjoy such a pretty little latchet bow with magazine and so might somebody wealthy enough to have it made even though its not that practical.
@@foldionepapyrus3441 I think all your reasoning makes sense, and I agree that you've probably put your finger on the answer to the question of why we don't find these things depicted in art or in the archeological record.
I believe that there was a sort of primitive, magazine fed ballista built by Archimedes. Not really a crossbow because it's torsion powered rather than tension, but not a million miles away. Didn't see much use though, the extra complexity in the device, the reduced power, and the increased loading time were too big draw backs for the increase in shooting rate. I believe the same was true for the Chinese repeating bows, which were more court weapons than battlefield ones.
@@QuantumHistorian Yes - earlier in this thread I said that the fact that magazines weren't widely enough used to have left any trace was "unaccountable". But now I realise that there were good, sound reasons for the people of that period to leave them well alone. Bulk, complexity and the fact that magazines didn't let you shoot more bolts per hour, but simply let you deliver them in a succession of quick bursts, would top my new-found list of those reasons.
I was told the the Border Reivers (not Reavers!) Used to refer to the bow as 'The Latch'. And yes, mine is a Border Reiver clan name. I have one of Tod's excellent Dudgeon daggers. Might have to save for a latchet bow now 😊
Thanks for the support and no hard feelings over the raiding I hope
@@tods_workshop None - just don't mention the dudgeon dagger to the Armstrongs! ;)
@@tobyrobson2939 Or let one of us read it in the comment section.
The 800 lbs draw weight made me realise I want to see a collaboration with someone like Eddie Hall, just to see how fast he can reload that crossbow.
Yup, medieval and Eddie Hall sounds good both together 😅
As fun as that sounds it's more of a technique kind of deal more than strength
@@styxspeedrun It's still a question, though, how much of the technique might be rendered unnecessary by someone as wildly outside the normal strength of a period crossbowman as Eddie Hall. And then, if he can learn the technique reasonably well how much might the system's potential be amplified by his greater strength.
No reason to go all the way with Eddie Hall, I wonder just how heavy a crossbow could Joe Gibbs draw, with his strenght and considerable prowess in drawing "classic" bows. I imagine he could try to tackle the 600 pound area with some practice and good belt. Andreas Bichler draws 440 with a doubler belt, and he's bit older gentleman and as far as I am aware not able to draw 190 pound monster bows at all.
Are you guys talking about the guy that was on stan lees superhumans? He can roll up frying pans and tie horseshoes in knots.
Powerful enough being the key phrase
Exactly and this is the key point. If someone is barely wearing any armor that thing would get the job done, period.
Dark Elf general -- you have my attention! For Malekith!
Ah I see you are a man of culture as well. (Excited for the old world)
I understood this reference.
One of those small bolts from the Reivers bow would certainly spoil your day if it didn't actually kill you! As always I enjoyed the video.
And if the bolt didn't kill you, with a week of festering, the wound infection most definitely could.
In the correctional facility I used to work in, we used pepperball guns (think paintball guns loaded with pepper powder) to break up fights. We had harder hitting less-lethal shotguns and 40mm launchers, but the sting of a pepperball was enough to gain compliance in most situations. Even if the majority of injuries caused by this crossbow weren't lethal, the pain of being shot would be enough to deter further hostile action in most situations.
Now I want to play a siege level of a medieval spy game where you infiltrate a castle and then sneak around tossing all the crannequins, goats' feet, and windlasses into the forge to sabotage the enemy's defenses
LOL but true.
Would love to see a chu ko nu video comparing it to the other crossbows you have made. A general video comparing Chinese composite crossbows to European ones would also be cool.
我是中国人，我不知道你们的翻译怎么回事这个连弩的正确读音应该是“zhu ge nu”这个分解开，里面的“zhuge”等于“诸葛”是中国三国时期的蜀国的人物，传言他很聪明经常会有发明，这个连弩就是他的众多发明之一，其中的“nu”等同于“弩”就是十字弓的意思
@@leeho8746 basic translation "i'm chinese, the transliteration chu ku no is outdated, it should be zhu ge nu thats how you write it in modern day. Zhu Ge was a famous strategist in the third kingdom, associated with many inventions such as the repeating crossbow.
He doesn’t show any asiatic crossbows. I understand he is based on England and allowed to make whatever content he wants. After all it’s a KZhead platform where you post what your interested in
@@HistoricalWeapons I never said he has to make a video on it, I just gave a suggestion of something I thought would be interesting. Suggesting something isn’t forcing someone to do something.
I see you've taken a cue from Paul Harrell with the meat target, nice!
One should also not underestimate the importance of beauty: If you are walking around with the latchet bow every day as a longer range self defence weapon, then you want something that also puts a smile on your face every time you look at it. And the sheer elegance of this nifty little design absolutely does that.
There is a crossbow of even more power which is called the arbalest I believe. They are usually very very powerful and rare to find an antique example. They were a bigger deal on the continental mainland (Germany in particular) and were like under-sized balistas (Usually not carried around on campaign but on fortresses and city walls for use by troops and city watch etc).
I've always had a soft spot for goat's-foot-lever crossbows. It just seems like such a nice compromise between power, speed, and rugged dependency. Belt or stirrup loaded bows might be too weak against an armoured target, while a windlass bow is more like field artillery and lacking in ease of use or flexibility. Goat's foot however, sits just in the sweet spot IMHO.
it seems that with these inefficient steel limbs you can get more power if you use a heavier bolt. It would make sense to test most of these crossbows with heavy bolts of the same weight.
Not sure it's the right niche but if anyone's in total fixation with hardcore Medieval Art of War (mostly collective tactics rather than individual weapons performance) I strongly recommend Schwerpunkt's videos series
I love the very British mix and match of imperial and metric units in the table. ft/s and kgm/s - not a problem 😂
I try
I'd love to see a latchet steel bow reworked to use a composite bow just to see how much extra power the new materials would have made a historic bow have.
Fascinating! Thank you!
I love these videos. I wish you were teaching at uni. One of our lecturers got us to do design and build mini projects on some mediaeval seige engines. But your specific knowledge and passion is unparalleled. Thanks Todd. These videos help keep my engineering brain alive.
Considering the big difference in draw weight between the crannequin and the goat's foot, it's a bit surprising how small the difference is between them in terms of energy and momentum. It just goes to show that draw weight is not the be all and end all when it comes to how hard that bolt is going to hit.
I probably just set the draw length or brace height a bit long on the goats foot or a bit short on the cranequin so the difference is slight in this case. I know the weights for the various bows I use so don't often weigh them. It is amazing how few mm can change the weight massively.
Crossbows generally are far less efficient than ordinary bows, medieval european crossbows especially so. Apart from compactness & quicker to train to use, why use 2 or 3+ the energy/strangth to shoot like a far lighter hand bow? Even a modern, more efficient crossbow takes c.175lb to shoot like a 70lb bow.
Yeah but you have to be trained and have experience for that to be true. If you got guys with no experience crossbows,spear, and maces or clubs make them a dangerous army fast.
@@tods_workshop I figured it was probably to do with the draw lengths, didn't think about the brace height. Obviously draw weight is very important to how a crossbow performs, but it's fascinating to me how many other factors also play into it!
on my bows, a 1mm increase in brace height equates to a 5mm difference in draw length weight. Not sure how to explain it as I don't really have the words, without writing an essay, but basically tiny differences in brace height make large differences in the ultimate weight because the bows stack so rapidly.
The deal with the modern bow (Jörg's design) is the magazine. That kind of changes everything about the concept, don't you think? If you're in a standing defence system you could make that a 90 arrow magasine which means constant fire, you could make it big to just push down on a wall which means power could be really great, you could make it a longer draw meaning distance shots... If you have a defence position and a crossbow with a magazine for the arrows and a court full of longbows you could take out basically anything along with the other traditional means. Anyway, my point is that reloading in combat is a mindfuck that takes ages longer than what you ever have and I should know.
I absolutely love it when you do experimental archeology. I would love one of those Latchet Crossbows.
I counted 3 shots with the latchet in less than 30 seconds. Now that's soldiering!
Brilliant video, Tod. Thank you so much! Lots more data to add to my spreadsheets. The 800-850lb crossbow data is particularly helpful. You had done a range test on this crossbow in the past, and you achieved 217m with the 65 (1000-grain) bolt. This chrono test now supports my theory of the speed and weight needed for a 100lb bow (or fast 90-95lb) yew bow to reach that 200m (220-yard) statute distance in my last test. Thank you so much. Of course, I need to test with a bow as well, but this definitely puts me on the right path!
"It's not a very powerful bow" Nope, but it's powerful ENOUGH to make a speculative raider 1) go down or 2) go away. It has exactly as much power as it needs, with a high fire rate to match!
And if 2, has a good chance to leave the discouraged raider with a deep festering wound that's likely to kill them within a fourthnight anyway...
@@SonsOfLorgar Yep, one that all his mates are going to see and think "Hamish died in a really ugly way we'd better not raid that spot again"
@@SonsOfLorgar I just had a thought too. Not just that; 3, 4 guys with one of these each in a semi-protected structure is basically a machine gun nest for the era. There'll be a bolt going out every 2-5 seconds and you're not getting close to that without a lot of people having bolts in them.
Just the idea of a doohickey, that you do a thing to, then put a mini spear in it, so you can yeet it at someone or something is just so funny to me. The wobbling in the bolt in the footage of you shooting the cranequin and it just wobbling like that was really funny. Idk why.
Great video as always ❤
Another great video Tod. Thanks
I just love these videos. Thanks Tod.
This was really really interesting. And as you said, 400 years but still so similar. And we think we are advanced now, but just to come up with that idea 400 years ago and make it work as good as it did. That's advanced.
Holy crap!! That's scary! 😳 Joe Gibbs X 30 all equipped with "Instant Legolas" would have changed history! 😁👍🏼
Lovely video, was a lot of fun to watch!
Interesting as always. Great to see the return of the Joe Gibbs Rapid Fire Group.
Very insightful!
Back in the day the mini crossbows would be kept on your horse and if you were being chased by another horseman you could shoot their horse slowing it with injury allowing you to out run the pursuers.
Yeah, but the other shot is they could be doing the same thing to the guy's horse who they are pursuing. :)
@@LandersWorkshop no the horses head is in the way
Not always. Uphill, downhill, leaning off to one-side, making an angled approach etc. Cheviots area is notoriously hilly and undulating as well so the argument doesn't stand to the empirical. Down south in the flatlands more likely it's less effective. @@andrewsock1608
Wonderful video, great comparison. Than you!
Looks like the goats foot and the adder shot right , the others knock the bolt up in a unpredictable manner. I always encountered that problem when making mini crossbows too. The head weight and string thickness and precisely where and how the string contacts the bolt make huge difference in elevation accuracy. Sometimes you want it to bump the bolt up if it’s a low power crossbow but I like straight flat shots . Your bolt needs to be as thick as your string if you have a fat string.
Mostly it is an issue with bows like the hunting bow that do not have a bolt groove, but a holder at the front because the bolt is already canted upward so does lift on launch, but as long as the lift is predictable there is no issue
@@tods_workshop it just makes it less intuitive to shoot.
So nice to see Tod enjoying the spring.
Gotta love an education ad! Well done Todd. Keep them in there.
Another great video Tod!!! I enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
One of the funniest things I ever saw was in the Chinese movie Red Cliff - they had these repeating crossbows, which were supposed to be a super invention. How did they use them? A couple of individuals (at different times in the movie) ran forward, stood out in the open, and pumped the handle back and forth a few times, firing from the hip. Never mind hitting anything.
Yeah that’s right, it can shoot fast but they don’t really get to aim it because of that.
The latchet crossbow has so much character to it, it's hard not to be fond of it. I realize a lot of time and resources would be needed, but seeing a magazine for the latchet bow (or attempting a medieval version of the adder) would be incredible.
Thanks I never knew about the lachet
Great Video, I would love to see this with the magazine feature.
That clip of the repeating longbow mag Im imagining You have two guys An archer and a support When the mag is finished you trade the bow out for a loaded one and the support loads the first bow Then repeats. Much like how it was sometimes done with crossbows. A line of those would be devastating.
I’d love to see you investigate and compare a classic Chinese crossbow. Not necessarily the crazy repeating one, but I want to know more about things change with their longer power stroke.
Love this thank you 😊
There's a thing that always got me with these fast reloading small bows. If you can't reload before your - now thoroughly pissed off - adversary can reach you, the reload is a little moot. Different, of course, if you have a mate who is also loading theirs, but ideally you want that second bolt before the adversary can move from just in range to within sword's reach.
I dunno, the bolt has enough power to go in to flesh as far as the fletching at close range. That's an ugly wound which will ruin almost anyone's day immediately...
But most propably will not kill him outright, so there is enough life time in him to run up to you and impale with his sword...
Don't be stupid. Someone bangs on your door, demanding you paying them the money back you won yesterday while they were drunk, you get the bow, and when they kick open the door, you put one in htem and then you run out the backdoor, laughing. All Crossbows are one shot things against someone running at you at full speed, which might be why nobody puts a magazine on them.
For some fights and battles though the crossbow troops would be among spearmen, or even laying under screens or pikes, which would make it more a thing of potential. Granted that was more a Swiss and German thing but you get the vibe. @@steemlenn8797
wow I love the latchet
I have the Adder with a 7 shot magazine & a green laser/torch, amazing bit of kit.
Side note: there is a family business over at the Borders, it’s called Border Archery. If you’ve never seen their bows or know about their very rich history in making their recurve bows and crossbows, I highly recommend it. Take care Todd!
Great video!
Amazing content again, nice to see Joerg's invention. I'd love a discussion about the possibilities of compounds bows in medieval times.
This is so cool. I love this.
Medieval people didn’t need a bolt magazine because they usually had two or more crossbows and someone to load one wile the shooter shoots the other one. It’s still practiced with shot guns by pheasant hunters in England
I also would love to own the latchet bow, just because of the history, the beauty of the materials . . . Your comment about the plywood and the gib being different measurements made me smile. My grandad built his holiday home from shipping dunnage he recovered from the beaches of Great Barrier Island. It had been thrown overboard from shipping that was leaving port, and the different Nations that shipped here, had different sizes and lengths of dunnage So when we went to put new roofing iron up, it was mindbogglingly difficult, none of the purlings and rafters actually matched up, and you couldn't find a single line for the nailing down of the sheets.
Awesome video as always
Thanks
Learning that those latchet crossbows were used as civil defense weapons puts the asiatic reflex bow into perspective that I'm shooting for purely recreationally purposes. It has a relatively low poundage (35@33) compared to actual war or hunting bows, but it does manage to get roughly 60 J and 1.3 kg m/s which on paper would beat even the adder.
I love my adder. The adder is a perfect home defense weapon, particularly for those in Europe who can't own firearms like we can in America. Based on those numbers the adder is very, very good all around for the low 130lb draw weight.
Seems like bows went through a similar evolution to firearms. Obviously over a longer period. But today we use small, fast bullets because even though they may not remove massive chunks like say a musket would, it’s fast, accurate and will still more than do the job.
Great video! Jeorg has created some amazing things the guy is a modern genius. Similarly, our ancestors were just as innovative with what they had available to them at the time. I hope Jeorg is a made man after all of his hard work getting these design functional and to market, I know he's a humble man that wasn't in it for the money but he certainly deserves it with the effort he's put in ❤️👌
Ummm that opening, mind Blown
Very interesting, Mr. Todd thank you😊
A pleasure
Well... the obvious thing to do is to make your favourite but with a magazine 😀 . Looking forward to seeing how it preforms.
Tod, the "K" in Landsknecht is not silent! And I agree, the latchet crossbow is truly beautiful, it's the first time I saw this and I love it already.
right at 3:30 i absolutely love that point and love it being brought up by respected knowledgeable scholars such as yourself! It's always been annoying to me how so many people regard medieval(or any historical era) peoples as dunces and idiots because they had less access to information or tech. I think it's why reading old stream of consciousness style novels are so entertaining, everyone jokes that "things change but people stay the same" but really truly I think people liken historical people to Encino Man. Always love your content, just wanted to give an extra thumbs up for a topic that deserves so much more attention than it gets in media :)
The latch bow was used by border horsemen and mainly used against unarmoured targets, and may have been used at Flodden by the border horse to slow the advancing shiltrons which almost turned the right flank of the English line
Great video! woud love to see the same with medieval and compund bow
Loved the video! Absolutely brilliant 👏. I wounder, beside the obvious comparison by numbers, what would the economical aspect would be, if compared side by side? How much would it cost to produce one, and own one? Much appreciated 🤗
Fascinating. For some reason I'd always had it in my head that Windlass Crossbows could reliably launch projectiles at over 100m/s, but apparently not. As an aside, seeing the Goat's foot and Windlass used alongside each other has me wondering. I'd love to see some comparative armour and rate-of-fire tests for those two. To the best of my understanding, even a Windlass Crossbow can't penetrate a well-made cuirass, so it would be really interesting to see if some other variable showed up explaining the decline of the Goat's Foot, or if this is just another misconception. Great work as always.
800# /6" is too little to bother a windlass. It can still be done with lever or belt
I finally have a good bow to keep in mind when ttrpgs talk about a hand crossbow
I really appreciate the look at these items outside pure military. People tend to get so hung up on military they miss that people still wanted hunting tools or just fun gadgets back then.
Awesome comparison! I like especially that you add the energy/momentum, to give a full picture.👍 It‘s very enlightening to see that modern materials have 3x the energy here, didnt expect that. Just seen recently a comparison of a sinew/horn/wood bow with a carbon/wood bow from Armin Hirmer,both from Grozer, same parameters except thickness-and the same arrow weight achieved the same speed, nearly no difference! Looks like Steel is suffering of an density malus, beside other parameters. You touched the magazine question, and that one is open to me, why this was not considered desired-and the same with pistolgrips, that truly help with precision/safety-but it was considered not relevant-May be the mindset was not exactly the same, but things like pistole grip come in the way when worn on the back together with other items? We don‘t fully understand the european mediaval constraints, as I generally find the crossbow history odd-less and less powerstroke, more weight, bulky. Some say bows covered the fast-repeatin shooter role, so crossbows developped to mobile armor piercing artillery instead. That sounds feasible to me.
jeorgsprave's got an even smaller faster crossbow now. its like a crossbow smg.
I would love to see a latchet with 'fibreglass' prod and dacron string to get an idea of how much improvement the modern materials make. The rest of the bow would be identical
The small medieval crossbow is really lovely. Such a beautiful piece. And still powerful enough to stop an unarmored opponent.
Thanks and yes it would be dangerous, but is it dangerous enough?
Looks like it would get through padded armor, so probably ideal for reiver guys?@@tods_workshop
I agree on every point that you made, there is both a place for old school and modern.
I absolutely love modern crossbows and my favourite is the excalibur eclipse XT it shoots like a old 200 lb war bow.
Tour de force! Thanks.
"historical people were no different from us" Hear hear!!! So rare for people to aknowledge this.
Wondering if you had seen the Leonardo da Vinci design crossbow which also used a built in lever system similar to the adder and reaver crossbow and if you had any thoughts or options about? Maybe even doing a video about it.
I was about to comment this too! The Leonardo Da Vinci crossbow is real interesting to me and I'd love to see Todd's take on one.
I have and there is an excellent repro by Andreas Bichler with a YT vid. I mention it in the video I filmed today about the latchet bow.....It is a really interesting design, but I think it cannot be very powerful; but that is a guess.
@@tods_workshop Very Cool. Always interesting to see different crossbow design and their effectiveness. I'd imagine there be a limit to how much force you can generate from a lever system before it becomes too ineffective. Still a cool a design and glad to hear your opinion.
Great video. I would love to see the difference with the latchet bow with a fibreglass limb and a Dacron string but the exact same base design.
I think this really shows that these "assassin's crossbows" weren't designed for actual assassinations, as something like one of these latching crossbows would be FAR more effective for an assassin (double the energy means they're powerful enough to kill an unarmored man much more reliably, plus you can at least nominally defend yourself with it afterwards) while being cheaper, easier and far more discreet to obtain.
I feel like there's a general misconception that "small" = "for assassins" because they're underhanded or unmanly or something. Most normal assassins just use normal-ass weapons. Using a tiny weapon mostly just makes it less likely you'll kill the target. Small weapons are for when you're designing for lightness and ease-of-use rather than range or lethality or whatever; they're the difference between being unarmed and armed, rather than being lethal and non-lethal.
Beautiful. Even though it is small and low powered, being hit with that latchet bow would definitely make me want to be somewhere else.
Lovely video as usual, and I gotta agree that purely based on style I’d much rather have the medieval version, it looks great! I’ve finally had a chance to visit the wallace collection last week and there are some incredible pieces. One thing that really stood out to me were some daggers which appear fold out into basically a three pronged dagger and I don’t really know what they were for. I don’t know if you’ve addressed them previously, but I’d love a video exploring them in detail, how they’re built / how they work and what they could have been for. My best guess would be as parry daggers to have improved sword catching abilities, but they look really fragile to the point where you’d think one hit and they’re done for, so maybe it’s something else… I’d love to see your take on those one day! :D
They are left hand daggers, but I agree they look pretty fragile, but if you can afford one, you can afford for it to be replaced, so they only need to work once
@@tods_workshop that might be, though you’ll have to hope it does work at least once :P Might also be a bit of a status symbol thing and it looks pretty intimidating as well…
@tods_workshop Your Main gauche left hand dagger is beautiful.
I do love both however the underlying lever grab is even better if I was a horseman.
08:15 ... the ancient people of Greece and Rome were just like us in our thinking and our enjoyment of having fun. Just as some of us here in the US who have a lot of property have friends over for a BBQ and bring out the .22 caliber rifle and plink cans for fun, I would not doubt if the ancient people of Rome would throw darts or small axes at old pottery, or the people of the medieval times would have a dinner and wine party and plink with a small crossbow at pottery or anything that would spread joy to observers when hit by a tiny little bolt. How do we know the people of ancient times were just like us? Graffitti... yes, in Pompeii was found a tavern, with the same type of bar we have today that we walk up to and sit on the stool to enjoy a pint or three. On the bar counter was found scrawled graffitti "Bob's wife is a loose woman" or "Jimmy is so fat the butcher thought he was a pig"... insulting and often risque graffiti has been found all over Pompeii... with the exact type of insults we would scrawl on a restroom wall. Ancient people of Greece and Rome were just a few thousand years back. Considering how long humans have been around, the ancient folk of Greece and Rome might as well be immediate family or friends. The tech was different, but the jokes were the same, the pranks, the laughter, dancing and music... we are no different, so with that, we know they enjoyed a backyard party where small weapons or wooden replicas would be used to goof around with, or later, low-power crossbows for parlor plinking. It's a fun concept to think about... some guy a thousand years ago having the same type of thoughts and love of sports as we have today... just with different technology. With a bit of explaining, they would know how to use a modern firearm or drive a car (after they get over the astonishment, of course)... but the ancient people we think are so long ago simply were no different than you or I today.