Karpov on Kasparov 👑 1984 World Chess Championship
Who better to analyse Garry Kasparov's World Championship games than his opponent and eternal rival, Anatoly Karpov? 🤔 Get instant access to Karpov's astounding analysis of his matches against Kasparov, with 35% off. ►ichs.co/2C5sLag
When Garry Kasparov and Anatoly Karpov started their 1984-85 World Chess Championship match, little did they know the controversy that would surround it.
Karpov started well, and Kasparov was down 4-0 after the first 9 games. The championship would be a "first to six wins" match. With the score so one-sided, some predicted that Kasparov would lose 6-0 within 18 games!
Garry Kasparov is made of stronger stuff, however, and fought hard. They drew seventeen games in a row before Kasparov lost another, but yet again he fought back with another series of draws until game 32 when he picked up his first win against the World Champion. More draws followed - another 14, in fact, setting a new record for the most games played in a World Championship match.
With the score 5-3 to Karpov, the match was suddenly halted by FIDE President Florencio Campomanes, becoming the first and only World Championship Match to end without a decisive result. Both players said they wanted the match to continue, but Campomanes cited the health of the players, saying the players had been under strain due to the length of the match.
Eventually Karpov and Kasparov would restart the match in 1985 and Kasparov would become the youngest World Chess Champion at 22 years of age.
In this video, Karpov, along with Ron Henley, take a look at game 3 of the 1984/85 match. Kasparov surprised Karpov by responding to 1. e4 with the Paulsen Variation of the Sicilian Defense. Karpov naturally leapt on the chance to achieve a bind on the center with 5. Nb5 and 6. c4. Kasparov continued with some home preparation involving 10. ...b6, 11. ...Bb7, and 12. ...Na5!? - creating immediate complications and trying to push Karpov off balance very early in the opening.
Kasparov continued with an interesting pawn sacrifice on 16. ...d5?! - however Karpov emerged from the complications with a clear advantage and extra pawn on the queenside. Initially it appeared the Kasparov's strong activity would compensate for the pawn minus and give him good drawing chances, however Karpov's energetic plan and response made it very clear that Kasparov would face a very difficult defense. Karpov introduced some excellent back-rank tactics to push harder on Kasparov's already shaky defense, as well as taking advantage of the Kasparov's misplaced Nb7.
This game must have come as quite a shock to Kasparov, as Karpov first overcame his home preparation and then defeated Kasparov in his strength - tactical complications!
► Corresponding article from this video with extra goodies: **** www.ichess.net/blog/karpov-ka...
► Is Karpov the best Chess player ever? www.ichess.net/blog/best-ches...
► Come checkout the iChess.net shop, we have the world’s largest collection of chess videos and chess courses: ichs.co/iChessShop
********* Other Videos from iChess *********
► Subscribe to our main KZhead Channel: ichs.co/iChSubscribe
► Check out award winning Master Method video series: ichs.co/MasterMethod
Checkout our most recent video: ichs.co/latest-chess-video
********* FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL: **********
Facebook: ichs.co/iChessFB
Twitter: ichs.co/iChessTwitter
KZhead: ichs.co/iChSubscribe
********* Our Other KZhead Channels **********
iChess Ch 2: ichs.co/iChess2
iChess en español: ichs.co/iChessESP
Karpov is a very humble genius it looks like he plays simple and uncomplicated Chess but it's very powerful chess.
no computers! no engines! love the board thet are using! PERFECT!!!
+Harabas349 I'm glad you like this board! This is an old video but very instructive video. And This is the reason of using this "old" technology!
old school is the best school... : )
im thinking of making that board and hang up in my bedroom.
The board is lacking notation (A-H, 1-8). It would better with it.
@@zvonimirtosic6171 I know that Rachmaninoffs piano was emblazoned with letters CDEFGAB
Karpov is generous to talk about games from what must have been a painful time in his career. So close to a 6-0 wipeout!
It was nothing close to a 6-0 wipeout. It was 11-13 which is very, very even. Additionally for the next few coming years Karpov would challenge with just as much and more eveness. Don't just spout nonsense.
@@gamespotlive3673 Maybe he is talking about the fact that Karpov himself wasn't able to score 6-0 against Kasparov in their WCC in 1984
@@gamespotlive3673he's talking about 1984 when Karpov had a 5-0 lead. Maybe you shouldn't spout nonsense without understanding a comment.
anatoly has a great personality
I personally think Fischer quit chess "via 176 conditions" when faced with a looming match against the young Karpov in 1975. True, Kasparov eclipsed Karpov in the decades to come, but only just. In fact in all their games through their different world title matches gary had just a plus score of 4 games. When he was a junior, Karpov was invited to an adult tournament by mistake. Rather than cancel, his trainer thought it would be a "good experience" for anatoly to play the stronger older players. He won EVERY game! When he was 5-0 up against gary, karpov made the great mistake of starting to play boring drawish positions. He was hoping for gary to make a mistake. But he became tired, missed a win in an ending and gary came back with victories resulting in the cancelation of that match and of course the rest is history. I urge players of all strengths to go through karpovs games here on youtube. They tend to be positional rather than the fireworks of Kasparov's games, but nonetheless his games are beautiful in their own right.
Right, it was a matter of stamina in the first great battle with Kasparov, who learned so much he was able to dominate the world. Had the match been with today's rules, of course Karpov would have won easily.
@mizofan, @the jupiter; Re Karpov vs Kasparov games in 1980s - I can bet in $1000 that Karpov was *forced* to play badly. No one leads 5-0 and loses, that is not possible in an ordinary situation. The game of chess often has a nasty background game of chess too. Chess was a premier political weapon during the Cold War, within each of the blocs and also in between them. In the Western press, Kasparov represented "young" part of the USSR that wanted Western values and "individual freedom", and Karpov represented old-fashioned bad Communism. When the Western bloc lost Fischer, really important player to win them battles in the Cold War, West was looking for another star, and found him in young Kasparov, a keen player from within the opposite bloc. (West was recruiting other USSR players before that too). Karpov "losing" miserably after 5-0, is nothing but a farce played for the befuddled people (and can be easily explained away because to most people chess is a labyrinth of mystery). In early 1980s, USSR was under tremendous pressure with war in Afganistan, they were check-matted there, economy was in ruins, things started to fall apart from the top, they were ready to issue favours to the West in exchange for economic help, and young Kasparov was already playing for the West - he became a pawn for the Western oligarchs back then. He is totally on board with their ideas, and continues until now.
Bobby spotted the world champ 2 games, let him win intentionally and still whipped him. Then, his paranoia got the better of him. He closest friends all say he was carrying several poison antedotes in a suitcase around with him and actually believed the russians were actively trying to assassinate him. Or should i say, the russians and the jews, he was paranoid of the jews. Sad, because he was a jew himself, but refused to acknowledge his bloodline. I believe he beats karpov, kasperov im not so sure. The world was robbed of a true genius when he walked away.
thorn35 Bobby Fischer was a true genius. I also believe that he would beat Karpov in 1974. Ultimately, his demons would got the best of him, and Tolja would prevail. Now, in that alternate timeline, Karpov would be far better player, and given how small the margin of victories between him and Kasparov was anyway, I am sure he would wipe the board with Kasparov in 1984. Hence, there would be no rematch in 1985 and “former champion prerogative match” in 1986. They would meet perhaps again in 1988, and again, that was a close affair. It’s anybody’s guess. In a way, Bobby ended his career, and deprived Tolja of becoming the best player he could possibly become. And deprived us all of just one or two incredible showdowns in the 1970’s. What a pity.
Zvonimir Tosic just to clear a small inaccuracy: Karpov actually did not lose that encounter. He took an early 5:0 lead, as you pointed out, match than dragged on with countless draws. Kasparov then won three straight games, and FIDE concluded that the champion burned out. They stopped the match, and decided TO CONTINUE in a few months. To add salt for Karpov, they have decided that going into that encounter they will start from 0:0 (instead 5:3), and that both men shall go in as interim champions. Now, in 1985, Karpov narrowly lost.
Karpov openly grinning with sadistic pleasure at 14:46. Brilliant!
What can be more beautiful than this? It is both instructive and very nice to watch Anaroly Karpov explain one of his games against Kasparov. GM Henkey also contributed alot that made this video timeless and memorable. Good work!
Karpov is a living legend . Nice vid .
Thanks for uploading this,Karpov is a fantastic player.he has a very deep undertandment of the game.
Favorite Grandmaster of mine.
That's GM Ron Henley!
Karpov's voice is higher than expected.
Wow , remembered each movement!. Genius . Always prefer Anatoly than Garry.
This was awesome, great explanation by Anatoly
love the board which is being used.......old is gold ... and quite sober n simple explanation by gr8 karpov ...love it :))
I 'felt' the same way.
What a gentleman.
i would recommend the book ¨Think Like a Grandmaster¨ by GM Alex Kotov
I met Tolja when I was 12. I was already an admirer, although in my chess club Kasparov’s games were studied much more intensely by my peers. I have always found logic of his games more appealing, and I still do. I have simply always found Kasparov’s body of work of little use to study, because he was a maverick, much like Korchnoi. Additionally, as Tolja pointed out several times, Kasparov was preparing his games in advance, had an extraordinary memory, but once pressured and forced to play different chess, his winning chances were severely reduced. His obsession with chess almost covered that flaw.
Oh yeah, and Karpov never resorted to pre-match preparation I suppose. All top GMs, even before engines, prepared in advance. Karpov would have done almost as much prep as Garry prior to their matches.
Excelente partida!!
Karpov, a great guy.
"one pawn up.. probably easy win".. that's easy for you to say...
+Scy easy for a professional player.
I like Anatoly
The difference between Karpov and Kasparov in terms of chess ability is the slimmest of margin ..
Awesome explanation by Karpov ! Can you tell me the song name at the start ?
c4 is an interesting idea in this opening, allowing the b1 knight to develop without blocking the c pawn and it also discourages the a6-b5 expansion with tempo that black has otherwise
i could not agree more
Your welcome, we'll be releasing 2 more videos from this collection, one where he discusses the 1987 match and one where he discusses the 1990 match.
You're*
Karpov play chess with ideas and harmonise. Kasparov play with pure cslculation, home preparation and activitie.
Thats the beauty of chess. Everyone has its own style and approach.
When this aired?
Karpov is the man.
thankyou so much for the info !
In the past which i have never seen, newspapers in Turkey publush the games but today they are publishing nothing about chess. The reason might be today we dont have players like Karpov, or Fischer
Barış İnan or It doesn't exist a rivalry like there was between Karpov and Kasparov
0
It was unlimited match up to 6 victories (like in Bagio). Karpov lead 5:0, then 5:3 and then (right after Kasparov's 3rd victory) match was stopped by FIFA President Mr. Kampomanes. Botvinnik said: "now I see 3 possibilities: #1-- Karpov wins the last game and defends his title; #2-- Kasparov wins 3 games and becomes world champion; #3-- match will be stopped. #3 is the most probable, because #2 is more probable then #1".
It's the music from the original DVD
The famous "Water Tank" analysis
Wonderful music at 1:34
is this made for any TV program?
Umm but what happens if in 17:38 after White moves Bd3, Black plays Nf5?
4:34 karpov plays two moves 😆
Look at the youngster Irina Krush
Wow, what an amazing game!! You gotta love white's initiative there.
Too bad Fischer-Karpov never happened! That would have the 'match of the century'.
...would have 'been', I meant :)
Karpov > Kasparov
12:55 ez win
Well, when they were playing together, of course, but that was when Karpov was at his best and Kasparov was still young and inexperienced, by the time Kasparov peaked out, Karpov was already on the decline, so there was no point at which the two at their peaks played each other.
Actually they are of the same strength, watch the documentary about their WCC
Karpov da mang. Da gentlemang. Fuck I love him he's almost surpassing Capablanca and Tal for me, can't believe it but here we are.
@Daniel B lol...just yes.
I like Karpov's analysis. A fine analysis man☺. I want to learn proper analysis. I have no coach because it’s really hard to hire a coach and there is 2 or 3 chess club in my country and i live far away from these club and coaches. I am improving myself with reading books slowly and watch videos. I cannot use engine and i don’t like it. I have basic knowledge. My online rating is 1300. Suggest and recommend me something that i can be a good analyzer like them without engines. Thank you iChess
Hey Noman! Check this preview about calculation here: kzhead.info/sun/osdtZK56pnqZgoU/bejne.html
Re Karpov vs Kasparov games in 1980s - I can bet in $1000 that Karpov was *forced* to play badly. No one leads 5-0 and loses, that is not possible in an ordinary situation. The game of chess often has a nasty background game of chess too. Chess was a premier political weapon during the Cold War, within each of the blocs and also in between them. In the Western press, Kasparov represented "young" part of the USSR that wanted Western values and "individual freedom", and Karpov represented old-fashioned bad Communism. When the Western bloc lost Fischer, really important player to win them battles in the Cold War, West was looking for another star, and found him in young Kasparov, a keen player from within the opposite bloc. (West was recruiting other USSR players before that too). Karpov "losing" miserably after 5-0, is nothing but a farce played for the befuddled people (and can be easily explained away because to most people chess is a labyrinth of mystery). In early 1980s, USSR was under tremendous pressure with the war in Afghanistan, they were check-matted there, economy was in ruins, things started to fall apart from the top, they were ready to issue favours to the West in exchange for economic help, and young Kasparov was already playing for the West - he became a pawn for the Western oligarchs back then. He is totally on board with their ideas, and continues until now.
Fischer also claimed that Karpov vs.Kasparov matches were prearranged.
@@dirty7444 I don't think so. There is no logic to this at all.
David Copson Fischer claimed that he had done a move-by-move technical analysis of several of their games. According to Fischer, there is “no doubt” that the games were prearranged. You can listen to Fischer’s claims on KZhead. There are video clips.
Who was the girl in the commercial at 6:52? Looked like Irina Krush.
She looks like Irina Krush but I am not sure if it's her or not. But yes, it's possible!
The guy at the board says at 2:25 that Karpov is threatening a check with Kd6+ when that square is guarded by the bishop so it would end up being a simple piece exchange. There is nothing dangerous about the position, black could've just as well developed their other knight instead, for instance.
I have never seen when karpov played sicilian by Black pieces
2018 anyone?
2020 :)
Imagine having the internet back then. I could not find coverage of this back in those days for shit. I had to watch the Moscow Evening News on C SPAN just to know what the hell was going on.
Nowadays everybody knows what is going on, and nobody knows nothing LOL
After how many moves of this game, were Karpov and Kasparov out of their preparation ?
We can not know that, but his preparation was very profound.
my god each time karpov said "easy to draw", "easy to win" it hurts because if it was me id loose on either side id play.
When this footage was made?
Definitely in the 90's
@@ChesscomGames Thank you.
Karpov, a true gentleman even in hour of defeat unlike the burguer eater arrogant Kasparov - hope he's happy now with his "ustashe" passport...
Kasparov is the pawn in hands of the Western oligarchs, or, the New World Order.
Zvonimir Tosic why, because he's good?
'pawn up and very easy tow win' what the hell!
and now the Internet is also full of commercials 7:30 ;)
Wow
I some time win with just twelve move 1. e2-e4 f7-f6 2. Bf1-c4 b7-b6 3. Bc4xg8 Rh8xg8 4. d2-d4 g7-g6 5. Bc1-f4 Bf8-g7 6. Bf4xc7 Qd8xc7 7. Nb1-c3 Qc7xc3 8. b2xc3 Nb8-c6 9. Ng1-f3 Nc6xd4 10. Nf3xd4 Ke8-f8 11. Ra1-b1 Bg7-h8 12. Rb1xb6 a7xb6 13. g2-g4 Ra8xa2 14. Qd1-f3 Bc8-a6 15. Qf3xf6 e7xf6 16. Rh1-g1 Ba6-d3 17. c2xd3 Ra2xf2 18. Ke1xf2 Kf8-e7 19. Rg1-b1 Rg8-b8 20. Rb1xb6 Rb8xb6 21. Kf2-e3 Rb6-b5 22. Nd4xb5 d7-d5 23. e4xd5 Ke7-d7 24. Nb5-d4 Kd7-c7 25. Nd4-f3 Kc7-b7 26. Nf3-e5 f6xe5 27. Ke3-e4 Kb7-a7 28. h2-h4 Bh8-g7 29. h4-h5 Bg7-f6 30. h5xg6 Ka7-b7 31. g4-g5 Kb7-b6 32. Ke4-f5 Bf6xg5 33. Kf5xg5 h7xg6 34. Kg5xg6 Kb6-c5 35. Kg6-f5 Kc5xd5 36. Kf5-f6 Kd5-c6 37. d3-d4 Kc6-b5 38. d4xe5 Kb5-c6 39. c3-c4 Kc6-b7 40. c4-c5 Kb7-a6 41. c5-c6 Ka6-b5 42. c6-c7 Kb5-c5 43. c7-c8=B Kc5-c4 44. Bc8-h3 Kc4-c5 45. e5-e6 Kc5-d4 46. e6-e7 Kd4-c5 47. e7-e8=Q Kc5-d6 48. Qe8-e1 Kd6-c6 49. Kf6-e6 Kc6-b7 50. Ke6-d7 Kb7-a7 51. Kd7-e8 Ka7-b6 52. Ke8-d7 Kb6-a7 53. Kd7-d6 Ka7-b8 54. Kd6-c5 Kb8-a7 55. Qe1-e8 Ka7-b7 56. Bh3-d7 Kb7-c7 57. Kc5-b5 Kc7-b7 58. Kb5-a5 Kb7-c7 59. Ka5-a6 Kc7-d6 60. Ka6-b7 Kd6-d5 61. Kb7-b6 Kd5-c4 62. Bd7-c6 Kc4-c3 63. Bc6-b5 Kc3-b2 64. Bb5-a4 Kb2-c3 65. Ba4-b3 Kc3xb3 66. Kb6-a6 Kb3-c2 67. Qe8-e2 Kc2-b1 68. Ka6-a5 Kb1-c1 69. Ka5-b5 Kc1-b1 70. Kb5-b4 Kb1-a1 71. Kb4-b3 Ka1-b1 72. Qe2-d1
Pop song and video „Karpov!“ by DORIAN BLACK on the occasion of Anatoly Karpov’s 70th birthday: kzhead.info/sun/hdOLYrh8nIGHq30/bejne.html
who is that man in the video also a GM ? he talk much and know much nice :)
Ron Henley is the other guy, and was also a GM. Not a world-class GM, but a GM nonetheless.
@@srj34 Thanks 👍
Watch 16.02
17:38 but Nf5
After Nf5 White will continue with Re8+ Kg7 g4!! Nh4 Bf8+ Kf6 Be7+ Kg7 Bxh5 and Black lost its Knight!
كان العالم كله مشغول بالشطرنج خاصه منذ ظهور كاربوف وبعد ان هزم فيشر والان لانسمع الا مسي ورونالدو
So , Soviet Union vs Soviet Union .....still intriguing )))
I like that Russians doesn't use the word "the". Take bishop.
its like you did not read my comment but i might check it out
the guy in the beginning is so funny looking
Is he still funny looking at the end?
they're both funny looking lol
@@davidcopson5800 no just your mom.
The words lazy and Karpov should never be said together. He wasnt the unnatural work horse that was Kasparov, but far from lazy.
zrušiť zápas v 1984 bola veľká chyba.
nicht übel
you play g4 if he moves Nh6 you play g5 after Nf5 you play Re8 Kg7 Bf8
I like so muchhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Excellent subs "were related her takes her cunny 6 yes." lol
This tremendous GM diminished Kasparov wins and movement. He had been hurt all his life after Kasparov appear in his life. His mistakes are poor recognized and give Kasparov's credits to the team (home preparation) not to his abilities on the board. Bad looser. Therefore He is one of the best GM all times and I'm not sure Fisher beat him at the time the World Champ could occur
Kasparov looks alike my mother in law. The world is so disturbing.
i will never buy a chess book on how a grandmaster thinks becuz i will play chess and hopefully become a grandmaster of my own style of playing
Nicolas Berry good luck with that.
mhm... mhm
Kasparovs preparation failed against Karpovs.
GM missed mate in one!!
where??? I'm drinking, so maybe I missed it.
Matt Pike He 's talking about Qe8 that the host -a GM- missed in the analysis.
+Brian El-Khoury is the host not a grandmaster then?? he's introduced as GM Ron W. Henley at the beginning of this video
+vibovitold Man, you can be a gm and miss a mate. Not a huge deal. Ivanchuk (much stronger player than this host) missed a mate in one against Anand in a blitz game. Shit happens.
Brian El-Khoury i never said it's impossible (although highly unusual - they wouldn't become GMs by doing this often). same thing happened to Kramnik against Deep Fritz, if i remember correctly. i was only referring to the fact that in your comment "GM" appears scratched out, as if you denied that the host is a grandmaster
Kasparov, too
Nasty, ugly, shrill music in the middle of this. Hurts my ears.
Karpov was better than Kasparov. Kasparov's team was better.
Kasparov himself was definitely the creative core of his team. Karpov and others let more of their team work for them and develop ideas. The point is that Kasparov's main strength was preparation, and that strength certainly took on even more importance in the computer age. For him, it was important to know exactly how the game would go. He certainly couldn't compete with the technique of a Fischer or Karpov, but in what was his strength, he was terribly strong. You can perhaps say he was the strongest (with a knockout punch), but not the best player (in terms of universal and technical mastery).
Karpov one of the greatest of all time but to me Daniil Dubov will be the greatest of them all.
Hes good,but these guys are just better
There's so much passion behind these payers, old school chess coverage and music cheeses it up and ruins the sport imo. Something more serious and competitive should be played instead of silly jazz or boring graphics. Maybe something more classical?
That was muzak as it was termed then,not jazz.
Any one in 2019?
Yes, I believe there are about 7.5 billion people at this time.
@@davidcopson5800 7 Billion due to "the thing"
Let us not forget how this worm utilized Russia's pressure against Korchnoi's family,especially his son DURING the match. If he knew they were safe and sound he would have kicked Karpov's rearend. They were "even steven" against each other until the 78 match and Karpov knew it. What would people say if he won the title by default in 75 and then loses it in 78? He had to resort to other nefarious methods to put pressure on Korchnoi.
+Reflection Ofpower Victor Lvovich is a personal hero of mine, but I think you are being unfair. The soviet chess system was a monster no doubt and they did everything they could to prevent the defector from winning, but as far as I know Karpov was not involved in any of this and was personally gracious (unlike Petrosian and Polugaevsky)
Benjamin Drasin But it conveniently happened during their match. Karpov benefited greatly from it. Viktor was under tremendous psychological pressure. Imagine you are Korchnoi and you defect from Russia and THEN you are playing Karpov (Russian) and during their 2nd rematch this happens, "His son had been promised to be released to join his father in exile if he gave up his passport. When he did so, he was promptly drafted into the Soviet army. In spite of protests, Korchnoi's son was arrested for evading army service, sentenced to two and a half years in labour camp, and served the full sentence. After the release, he was again refused permission to leave the USSR." The Russians could have sent his son to the Afghanistan conflict in the most dangerous segments of it OR when he's in the labour "their was a scuffle and your son was killed" You're telling me that that had no effect on the challenger?? C'mon, what world do you live in? This is a back stabbing, cut throat world that will do ANYTHING to win or promote an agenda and that goes for Russia and ESPECIALLY the USA in which I reside.
+Benjamin Drasin well, there is no record of him speaking up against it, either :) it was all very convenient for him
vibovitold Yes this is a fair point, but consider the context: the USSR was the one place in the world where being a top-level chess player made you a superstar (nice house, dacha, personal staff, etc.) From the perspective of the players it was an incredibly benevolent system and all you had to do was occasionally lose a game when they told you to. The only person for whom this was too high a price to pay was Viktor, bless his heart, and for that he is my hero. The Soviet System was the true evil here; Karpov was merely seduced, as were Petrosian, Smyslov and Tal et. al. It's a sad tale of human frailty in the face of a truly wicked system but Karpov himself was just a pawn in it, so to speak.
Benjamin Drasin born and raised in an Eastern Bloc country, i understand the mechanism, but just because it can be explained, it doesn't mean we can't judge people who give in to temptation of benefiting from the misery of others. top-level sportsmen like Karpov had rockstar status in the USSR, and they had a say. authorities couldn't afford to treat them like average citizens. case in point: Boris Spassky, a very independent spirit who would often clash with Soviet authorities but they just had to bite the bullet on that nevertheless. let's not forget that Karpov - unlike Kasparov - was a genuine, devoted communist, and the belief that the end justifies the means is part of the doctrine. this is a moral stance by itself.
No one comes back down 4 games,ever, this match was fixed. You fooled alot of people russia but not me.
OMG THIRD I EM SO AWESOMEE!!!
yeah every single otb game has been prearranged for 40 years. Even my patzer games are prearranged
Karpov no, Kasparov was and is a Man.
The once and future king!
Kasparov who cheated Judith Polgar.
@@andersonarmstrong2650 Yeah, he isn't and never was a good character. Acutally the complete opposite. I have no respect for "Gazza" as a man anymore, as much as I respect him as a chess player. Also Fischer's harsh verdict against him for sure was not without reason.
This gay is moster
The presenter´s accent is just horrible!
Hanine H It's better than your avatar though.
asupshik Oh yeah baby, please humiliate me, I love it, don't stop *ah, ah, ah* Don'T STOP !!
Hanine H Are you a masochist? Sorry, I can do that only for money. Otherwise, I just state facts.
Ohh yeah! More! More!
Hanine H :)))))))))))
Wow