Nikon Z 180-600MM VS AF-S NIKON 200-500mm f/5.6E | Should you Upgrade?

2024 ж. 10 Мам.
13 288 Рет қаралды

LONG VIDEO - USE THE CHAPTERS TO NAVIGATE TO THE DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE VIDEO!
We compare the Nikon 180-600mm Z mount lens and the AF-S NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E lenses from Nikon on the Nikon Z9 in the field. We compare AF performance, hit rate, and color rendition. We take to task the questions of if you are trying to decide on the 2 lenses o if you own the 200-500, should you upgrade to the 180-600.
LONG VIDEO - USE THE CHAPTERS TO NAVIGATE TO THE DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE VIDEO!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
00:00 - Intro
00:37 - Lens Specs
02:16 - Lens Comparison
04:29 - A change of plans
06:15 - In the field - Seward and Wildlife
09:16 - 200-500 Gimbal Balance Issues
10:42 - 200-500 AF Tests
15:34 - 180-600 AF Tests
18:21 - AF Test Conclusions
18:34 - 200-500 Hit Rate Tests
24:28 - 180-600 Hit Rate Tests
26:57 - Hit Rate Conclusions
27:50 - Image Quality and Color Rendition Review
39:52 - Lens Cost Comparison
41:55 - Overall Conclusion
48:38 - Which one to Buy?
49:19 - Upgrade from the 200-500?
50:31 - Personal Thoughts on the 180-600
_____________________________________________________________
Affiliate links mean I earn a commission from qualifying purchases. This helps support my channel at no additional cost to you.
_____________________________________________________________
Zippo Heatbank 9s Rechargeable Hand Warmer amzn.to/46qyroZ
Sirui CT-3204 amzn.to/47bL6N2
Sirui PH20 amzn.to/47anCIk
Peak Design SL-BK-3 Slide, Camera Strap amzn.to/48rGL9R
Nikon Z 180-600MM amzn.to/3uvFsYj
Nikon Z9 amzn.to/3RPQ9OY
Nikon Z8 amzn.to/3qPftcs
Exascend Essential 1TB CFexpress Card Type B amzn.to/43QA5PM
Exascend 512GB Essential CFexpress Card Type B amzn.to/3CrP1rC
Exascend 256G/512G/1TB Essential CFexpress Card Type-B amzn.to/3CkWMje
Lenscoat Raincoat amzn.to/3BuKqVk
Vello BG-C18 Battery Grip amzn.to/40wJt9f
SmallRig AP-10 Carbon Fiber Tripod amzn.to/3Z5Ci86
Canon EOS R10 amzn.to/3nlJ8IX
Canon EOS R5 amzn.to/3xbg48A
Canon EOS R7 amzn.to/3ARWbow
Rode VideoMic GO II amzn.to/3DcKKtJ
Atomos Ninja V amzn.to/3DdzJZl
WANDRD PRVKE 21L Photography Backpack amzn.to/3BcYVg0
___________________________________________________________
SOCIAL MEDIA & WEB
Instagram: / sdwest11
Facebook Page: / sdwest11
Website & Shop: westakphoto.com/
WHO I AM.
My name is Scott West and I am a nature and wildlife photographer located in Alaska. I am very lucky to live in a place surrounded by amazing landscapes and even more amazing wildlife.
☊ MUSIC
Music licensed through Epidemic Sound www.epidemicsound.com/
Music licensed through Music Vine. musicvine.com/
Best Wishes
Scott

Пікірлер
  • The 200-500F5.6 has served me well for many years, with my D850 and Z9. No rush for the Z 180-600mm.

    @jfphotography69@jfphotography695 ай бұрын
    • 👍

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • The best comparison I have seen so far. Thank you.

    @augusto_alves@augusto_alves5 ай бұрын
    • Wow, thank you!

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • Love the lighting in this video. keep it up your good work!

    @fanclubnationth@fanclubnationth2 ай бұрын
    • Thank you! Will do!

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKAАй бұрын
  • Really good comparison. Thanks for sharing.

    @cryptographerchris4856@cryptographerchris48565 ай бұрын
    • Thanks for watching!

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • Great video, both lenses are great, for mounting Kirk makes a replacement collar with a built in arca Swiss foot and the foot also has a QD connector built in that you can attach your strap to and it makes it really easy to disconnect the strap when you want to mount the lens on a tripod. QD connectors are what the Military uses to carry their weapons and are rated to carry from 260 to 300lbs.

    @RonSkinnerPhotographer@RonSkinnerPhotographer5 ай бұрын
    • Very cool. Thanks for the tip.

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • Your real world testing methods for these comparisons is refreshing, and more applicable to the experience users can expect from the gear. I am blessed to have a unique situation where I have just retired and can afford one last major purchase to upgrade from DSLR (D850) to Mirrorless and duplicate my lenses and accessories. The trade in values is an insult and not worth the trouble. I already own the 200-500 but contemplate switching to the 180-600, so thank you for this informative video. 👍 I was a bit confused at first that the video at the end of the 200-500 hit rate segment (23:27 the section with the 2 Mallards) was actually the 180-600 based on the metadata in LR. I went back and watched it again and saw that you were just discussing the way the AF system works in general and not specifically about either lens? A little off track, but there are many options for telephoto lenses, and not just the 200-500 vs. 180-600. If you had $2000 in cash and were willing to trade in the 200-500 so you would have lets say $2500 total, what would you (new or used) buy?

    @jimowens8105@jimowens81055 ай бұрын
    • Thanks for watching 😄 $2,500... probably the 180-600 or the 100-400, depends on the reach you need.

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • I sold my 200-500mm when I upgraded to the Z system. I first bought the 400mm f4.5 because there was nothing else on the market in my price range (I will never be able to afford the 400mm f2.8), and recently added the 180-600mm and it is the best tele-combo I have ever had. These two lenses fully meet my expectations in wildlife photography.

    @REMAYi@REMAYi3 ай бұрын
    • very nice

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKAАй бұрын
  • Great comparison along with some on-the-mark points on evaluating both lenses. You did an outstanding job of outlining a subtlety in the Nikon Z AF system, that is focus acquisition is often very close before the "lock" is portrayed in the viewfinder. This is something I suspected from personal experience. I think the 180-600 presents a great value proposition for myself as a prosumer user. While I can drool over the performance of the long Z primes, my budget is not there. I know now that I can own the 180-600 and possibly rent or borrow one of the long flagship primes for any planned trip. Alaska wildlife & landscape is a favorite of mine - fully subscribed and liked!

    @johnmajors1449@johnmajors14494 ай бұрын
    • THANKS for watching 🎅🎄

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA4 ай бұрын
  • Great video and very well timed for me as I am about to trade in the F 200-500 with Z 180-600. I also have no complain about 200-500 but I mainly focus on birds and the additional 100mm is very attractive to me. Thanks for your great videos.

    @street_biologist6727@street_biologist67275 ай бұрын
    • Thanks and yes that extra 100mm is nice to have

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • Nice comparison! I feel that the 180-600 is enough of an upgrade to justify, for me! Got it, love it! As for the vr swithching, I have the vr control set in the i menu and can access it and adjust it while looking through the EVF. Takes some practice but is pretty quick. As for the strap situation, I use Blackrapid and a Arcatech quick release that allows me to just put a plate on the foot and leave it. Arcatech is pricey though but works well as a system for all my equipment, as does your setup. Thanks.

    @danbrown8979@danbrown89795 ай бұрын
    • Thanks for the info!

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
    • I use the Acratech quick release on a Blackrapid Curve and recently the swivel pulled though but luckily I had made a tether from the camera to the strap with a Peak Design anchor at the camera end and a Joby cord with a small carabiner clip around the strap!

      @johneast7987@johneast79872 ай бұрын
    • The newer Blackrapid straps have a beefed up swivel, much better that the original.@@johneast7987

      @danbrown8979@danbrown89792 ай бұрын
  • You asked about another way to attach strap. I use QD strap and arca swiss plates with that QD hole. No need to switch plate to go from tripod and strap. I use a OP/Tech uniloop system as a back up but have never needed to rely on it. System isn't for everyone but it works great for me and I use it for all my lens/camera bodies. I'd love to get a review from you on the lens wrap that you are using. I'm assuming that is a lenscoat

    @dah7772@dah77725 ай бұрын
    • Great tip. And the lens coat cover for the lens is in the back half of this video where I talk about lens protection and I install it on the lens in the video. kzhead.info/sun/hKuulLmKbKOGfX0/bejne.html

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • It's an excellent video. Thanks. For people like me, who already owned the 200-500, it reinforced the fact that there is no preeminent reason to upgrade yet to the 180-600 until Nikon puts there another Z lens with significant advantages vs the 200-500.

    @ricardo3198@ricardo3198Ай бұрын
    • The 180-600 has quite a few advantages. extra 100mm, no external telescoping zoom, better balance on gimbal, list goes on.

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKAАй бұрын
  • Awesome vid! Nice to see the 200-500 is no slouch on AF and image rendering. How is the 200-500 for video (stabe and noise)?

    @MTBD80@MTBD805 ай бұрын
    • It's great on video. I use it a lot for the wildlife videos on the channel.

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
    • @@WILDALASKA Nice!

      @MTBD80@MTBD805 ай бұрын
  • This is a very useful and practical comparison. Do you also have this kind of comparison done between the Z 180-600 f/6.3 vs the Z 600 f/6.3 PF and also the Z 180-600 f/6.3 vs the F Mount 600 f/4.0? If you can do a comparison that would be really great!

    @kramasubramaniyan@kramasubramaniyan5 ай бұрын
    • not yet.

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • I have had the 180-600mm for a couple of weeks. I struggled with it hand held, because it felt so front heavy at first. I dusted off my monopod and it made a huge difference. My keeper rate was surprising. At the end of the day the VR improvement with my Z9 alone is worth the purchase to me. With my monopod I randomly took a couple of Cardinals in flight approaching me at a 45 degree angle that surprised me (and other folks as well). They were among the most impressive shots on small birds in flight that I have ever had (maybe the best). The shots (of two different birds) were sharp and nicelly detailed and illluminated under wing and tail. I don't think my my DSLR lenses w. converter could come close to that image stabilization performance.

    @stanpiper8158@stanpiper81584 ай бұрын
    • It is very good stabilization

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA4 ай бұрын
  • I use a small arca Swiss clamp with eye for strap to quick attack to a plate on the foot. Works perfectly.

    @jamesgerboc@jamesgerbocАй бұрын
    • 👍

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKAАй бұрын
  • So I'm pretty happy with my Z8 + 200-500/5,6 but I'll probably update to new Z180-600. The focus speed is pretty important for me and also the internall zoom is a good thing due to cetre of gravity shift & dust tightness. I'm also courious about the nez Z lens sharpness at 600 mm but I need to try it by myself to see if it that good as I'm expecting if there are differences piece by piece..

    @tomasmarny3143@tomasmarny3143Ай бұрын
    • The 200-500 is still good but the 180-600 is a very special lens

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKAАй бұрын
  • Another Superb Comparison. Waiting for the 400 f4.5. And Is there anyway I can record a clean feed from the Z8/Z9 without anything on the screen, so that it might look like I have a 1080p video & stills shot at the same time.

    @stripes_in_raw@stripes_in_raw5 ай бұрын
    • Yes just set your EVF or LCD to have no information on it. The recorder just records what the eve is seeing and canon, Sony, and Nikon will let you set your viewfinder and lcd to be 'clean' with no info. This way you get a 'video' at same time as stills. Ive done it a few times to double up footage and stills.

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
    • @@WILDALASKA Thank you

      @stripes_in_raw@stripes_in_raw5 ай бұрын
  • I picked up the 200-500 last year for $1000. I don't love the lens handling, but the price and image quality are great, and I can still use it on my D800 if I need to. Thanks for this comparison... it helps me keep the G.A.S at bay!

    @GetOffMyyLawn@GetOffMyyLawn4 ай бұрын
    • I love the 200-500. Its 5.6 aperture and snappy, well at least on my Z9

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA4 ай бұрын
  • Just curious but what is that white external trackpad you are using? I've always had laptops so am used to using the trackpad ( never used a mouse ) and looking to upgrade soon to a full size PC, this trackpad you are using could be just what I am looking for 🙂

    @dunnymonster@dunnymonster5 ай бұрын
    • It's an Apple Magic Trackpad. I currently run a MacBook M2 Max 16' as my editing rig.

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • This was a very good review. Job well done. I have the 200-500 with a D500. I am considering upgrading my camera by next year to the Z8. I was wondering if it was necessary to upgrade to the 180-600. Doesn't sound like it is a necessity. I may keep the 200-500 and save for the next 20 years for the 800PF. Thanks! Subscribed.

    @MrHitthespot@MrHitthespot10 сағат бұрын
  • Very interesting but I wonder if the small differences in image quality that could be somewhat favorable to the 180-600 are a product of the optics or the software of the Z cameras. Even if they are RAW, I assume that all RAW come quite cooked from the beginning.

    @mistergiovanni7183@mistergiovanni7183Ай бұрын
    • RAW is the least cooked of formats really. The color and contrast is a little more favorable to my eye.

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKAАй бұрын
  • I own both these lenses and a Z8, Z6ii and a D500. If I had neither lens, I would go with the 180-600. The AF-S lens packs smaller, has a much smoother collar, wider tripod foot, VR control on the lens, constant wide open aperture and the image difference is very small. The Z lens is 10 oz lighter and the zoom ring throw is much shorter with 1 control button replicated in 4 places. If I had it to do over, I might have held off on the 180-600 until such time as I NEEDED to replace the 200-500 since I already had the FTZ II.

    @samwarren1429@samwarren14295 ай бұрын
    • 👍

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • How would you compare the 180-600 vs afs 600f4 vr besides the obvious weight differences.

    @samhalbrooks1534@samhalbrooks15345 ай бұрын
    • The 500 and 600 f4 lenses are different beasts all together as their glass is so much different and when you get to those focal ranges and f4 aperture it does something special to foregrounds and backgrounds. Plus color rendition is amazing on them

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • Thank you soooo much for this comparison. Exactly what I needed. I see now that I am not gaining much with that upgrade. I will rather now save up and add the 400mm 4.5 to my 200-500

    @kaijan2808@kaijan28085 ай бұрын
    • The 180-600 gain is really in the handling and balance of the lens. As far as IQ, AF hit rate most of the z line lenses are very close in those regards. And that extra 100mm reach is very key. The 400 4.5 will be next Sundays video.

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
    • Thank you so much for your answer. So I wait until next Sunday before taking a final decision 😊

      @kaijan2808@kaijan28085 ай бұрын
  • thank u

    @sergiollag1@sergiollag15 ай бұрын
    • You're welcome!

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • Really excellent discussion and comparison of 2 fantastic lenses emphasizing the practical performance of both lenses. I have been very pleasantly surprised by the performance, speed, sharpness, detail, and contrast of the 180-600 mm lens! I’m not sure what more Nikon would have done to make it an S series lens. Theoretically, f/5.6 throughout the entire zoom range would’ve been really nice. However, for its size, weight, price, and performance, this lens is unbeatable! I’ve also observed that it does extremely well with birds and flight, even when the birds are coming directly toward the camera. I feel that the in-focus hit rate is higher with this lens at 600 mm than it is with my 800 mm PF f/6.3 S series lens shooting the same subjects under the same conditions. The 180 to 600 mm lens reminds me a lot of the Canon RF 100-500 mm L series lens in its sharpness, speed, contrast, and overall image quality, with an additional 100 mm of focal range!

    @VABrowneMDPhD@VABrowneMDPhD5 ай бұрын
    • 👍 Very interesting about the 800 pf. Hopefully I can get my hands on a copy to test sometime. Love to see how it performs.

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • A touch of post may fix the contrast?

    @pjdilip@pjdilip3 ай бұрын
    • 👍

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKAАй бұрын
  • The 200 to 500 is such a huge log thou!

    @MrDaveB123@MrDaveB1235 ай бұрын
    • yup

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • The other point is those who use f-mount cameras and also z-mount cameras. 200-500 is the only viable option.

    @joebroyles5680@joebroyles56804 ай бұрын
    • 🤷‍♂️

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA4 ай бұрын
  • My 180-600 Kicks the Old 200-500 out the Park

    @Mr09260@Mr092605 ай бұрын
    • 👍

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
  • Sold my 200-500mm when I got my Z9. I’ll buy the 180-600mm when I can find one.

    @lour7753@lour77535 ай бұрын
    • Solid Choice

      @WILDALASKA@WILDALASKA5 ай бұрын
KZhead