KZhead
Ғылым және технология

AGM-158 JASSM: America's Secret Stealthy Missile

US Military News
2023 ж. 1 Қаң.
485 842 Рет қаралды
Жүктеу

The AGM-158 JASSM (Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile) is A Large, Stealthy Long-Range Missile developed by Lockheed Martin for the United States Armed Forces. It is a large, stealthy long-range weapon with a 450-kg armor piercing warhead. It completed testing and entered service with the U.S. Air Force in 2009, and has entered foreign service in Australia, Finland, and Poland as of 2014. An extended range version of the missile, the AGM-158B JASSM-ER (Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile-Extended Range), entered service in 2014. By September 2016, Lockheed Martin had delivered 2,000 total JASSMs comprising both variants to the USAF
Check out these top picks for you:
• MQ-9 REAPER: The Most ...
• This is America’s Bigg...
• This is America's C-RA...
🔔 Subscribe !
/ usmilitarynewsmn
🔖 OUR SOCIAL MEDIA!
---------------------------------------------
📲 Facebook ► / usnmil
🐦 Twitter ► / usmil_news
Thanks

Пікірлер

  • I work for Lockheed Martin the AGM-158 missiles are incredibly advance and are very accurate

    @gothgurlclique@gothgurlclique Жыл бұрын

    • Report to HR in the morning.

      @stevenkidd6761@stevenkidd6761 Жыл бұрын

    • @@stevenkidd6761 He will be called into the office in the morning.😁

      @libertyforall5764@libertyforall5764 Жыл бұрын

    • Good you're under Chinese radar

      @whysoserious7553@whysoserious7553 Жыл бұрын

    • Weh!? Really that missile technology of USA tottaly very late development and tottaly Behind by Chinese technology in term of Advance, no match, AGM-158 Mach 5, China DF-17 Mach 10, Russia ZIRCON Mach 7, hahaha 😆 😉 😀 And already exists in their weapons arsenal many years ago! While AGM-158 is not yet Mass production hahaha 😆 what happen!?

      @Wargamer_Asian@Wargamer_Asian Жыл бұрын

    • @@Wargamer_Asian The world won't believe anything Chinese claims like they claimed covid 19 didn't originate from China lol

      @whysoserious7553@whysoserious7553 Жыл бұрын

  • This AGM 158 is just a thing of beauty. Well worth the cost in my opinion.

    @skimmer8774@skimmer8774 Жыл бұрын

    • the more of them that are bought the lower the cost per unit

      @kevinsierra482@kevinsierra482 Жыл бұрын

  • The b1 is such a beautiful aircraft

    @madmanhadaoopsie1859@madmanhadaoopsie1859 Жыл бұрын

    • Yep

      @Stuff749@Stuff749 Жыл бұрын

    • It looks like a spaceship.

      @KC_Smooth@KC_Smooth Жыл бұрын

    • @@KC_Smooth yes as well at the b2

      @madmanhadaoopsie1859@madmanhadaoopsie1859 Жыл бұрын

    • Heck, even if it’s called the big ugly fat fella for a reason, the B-52 Stratofortress is also a beast! 😍

      @noahater5785@noahater5785 Жыл бұрын

    • I bet the Chinese and the Kult of Korea won't appreciate her as much as we do 😎

      @stevenkidd6761@stevenkidd6761 Жыл бұрын

  • The AGM-158B has a range of 585 miles and the AGM-158B2 has a range of 1200 miles when it goes into production. This thing is a beast. There is an anti ship version of the B, but the extra sensors and sech reduce the range to about 350 miles. They can also carry the HiJENKS EMP warhead when that is out. It is like the CHAMP but smaller so it will fit in these smaller cruise missiles. The B-2 can hold 24 of these missiles each, so they could have launched 48 total in this attack if they had wanted to. Do to its size though the AGM-158 can also fit on an F-15, F16, F/A-18 and even externally on the F-22 and F-35 as well as the B-1, B-2, B-21, and B-52. They also have a box called the Rapid Dragon that can be air dropped from a C-130 that can hold 6 of these missiles or 9 missiles in the C-17 version. This needs no modifications to the craft and is simply air-deployed from the back of the plane like normal. The missile then release and head to their individual targets.

    @toddabbott781@toddabbott781 Жыл бұрын

    • 24 missiles, at 1.3m each, including the cost of aircraft, likely around 100m+ just to use these.

      @slimmyraw@slimmyraw Жыл бұрын

    • Exactly. At 1200mi. The b-21 or b-2 serves no point. Conventional aircraft can drop these off without entering hostile airspace.

      @rationalpear1816@rationalpear1816 Жыл бұрын

    • Did you get that typed before the video ended and said , fk it, I'm posting it?

      @stevenkidd6761@stevenkidd6761 Жыл бұрын

    • @@slimmyraw In the new era of multi-trillion dollar profligate spending, who cares if we burn through a billion bucks with one batch of missiles being dropped and sent on their separate ways? If we can't beat them with weapons, we can spend them to death...

      @demef758@demef758 Жыл бұрын

    • @@rationalpear1816 That’s not true, fully load these things up to the gills with these JASSMs and you can pull off stealthy hit and run attacks hopefully without being spotted.

      @noahater5785@noahater5785 Жыл бұрын

  • Interesting weapon and video, thanks Sam and U.S. Military News. 👍🇺🇲

    @josephpacchetti5997@josephpacchetti5997 Жыл бұрын

  • I once had the pleasure of seeing this missile up close. Took screen shot and enlarged to max.

    @UknowIam@UknowIam Жыл бұрын

  • Tomahawks are underrated. They aren't stealth but they fly at like 20 meters above the ground so they're below most radar.

    @Bitchslapper316@Bitchslapper316 Жыл бұрын

    • Yet inferior to the Kalibir cruise missile.

      @John-hu9qg@John-hu9qg Жыл бұрын

    • @@John-hu9qg Not at all. Just see the many kalibirs shot down over Ukraine on their way to hit and apartment block/school/hospital. Keep trying tovarich!!

      @Debaucherousgeek@Debaucherousgeek Жыл бұрын

    • Yeah, but they are definitely not below the radar of short-range air defense systems and these systems eat tomahawks for breakfast.

      @alirazi3028@alirazi3028 Жыл бұрын

    • @@alirazi3028 Yeah short range defense systems can take them down pretty easily, even hand held things like stingers can. The thing is they have to know they are coming so if they don't detect the launch or see them on long range radar the reaction time plays the biggest role. Between detection time and identification it's often to late. They generally don't leave these systems active on auto because they would be shooting down their own aircraft and missiles. One example is during the gulf war a cruise missile was shot at the U.S.S Missouri and the Missouri started clouding the air with flak. One of the supporting destroyers had left it's phalanx on auto and it started spraying the flak in the air with bullets causing a bunch of hot depleted uranium to rain down on the decks of the Missouri.

      @Bitchslapper316@Bitchslapper316 Жыл бұрын

    • @@John-hu9qg Doubtful, considering they need western chips to make the Kalibr function. Even at 30 years old, with all the upgrades like 2 way data link, automated target tracking, loitering, 1000+ mile range and the ability to carry a W80 nucler warhead I would consider the old tomahawk a serious threat. Russia can't even keep their troops safe next door.

      @Sinclair_USMC@Sinclair_USMC Жыл бұрын

  • 9:14 that reaction is everything😂😂

    @yoatemybeans2334@yoatemybeans2334 Жыл бұрын

  • Hello from AIR FORCE 🇺🇦🤙🏻👌😉 SA-12 GLADIATOR! Thanks for support bro 😎 😊!

    @sej_1726@sej_1726 Жыл бұрын

  • Love yalls vid, keep it up mab

    @PizzaBananaSplit@PizzaBananaSplit Жыл бұрын

  • When they start busting out stealth JASSM, sh*t has really hit the fan.

    @Basieeee@Basieeee Жыл бұрын

    • A great way to produce conventional deterrence on stand off distances.

      @herptek@herptek Жыл бұрын

  • The B1 would make the coolest private jet

    @CHMichael@CHMichael Жыл бұрын

  • GOD BLESS AMERICA !!!!!

    @111111111990@111111111990 Жыл бұрын

  • What an impressive weapon.

    @davidwolf226@davidwolf226 Жыл бұрын

    • It's a basic weapon. Nothing impressive about it.

      @KimetsuNoYaiba100@KimetsuNoYaiba100 Жыл бұрын

  • Good thing it wasn't called the Joint Integrated Stealthy Standoff Missile. The acronym would have been embarrassing.

    @Chilly_Billy@Chilly_Billy Жыл бұрын

  • B1 quite a prepossessing machine. Beautiful aircraft.

    @calebkimm325@calebkimm325 Жыл бұрын

  • i like when you introduce those little lies among your report , 95% truth , 5% lies passes well and unoticed

    @DragonlordXV@DragonlordXV Жыл бұрын

  • That's one efficient and powerful missile

    @michaelwk67@michaelwk67 Жыл бұрын

  • Yeah.....still a beautiful aircraft😎

    @blaineatkins2968@blaineatkins2968 Жыл бұрын

  • About time and you really need to make them go further

    @ericclausen6772@ericclausen6772 Жыл бұрын

    • We have 1000miles 158C and from 50,000ft yeah 👍😁 we can definitely hit some Target's

      @rosevitelli5814@rosevitelli5814 Жыл бұрын

  • I'm guessing we'll soon be seeing them badasses in real actions soon.

    @dougtso4126@dougtso4126 Жыл бұрын

  • usa is the most agressive country through all the time. They started a huge number of coflicts all around the world.

    @RaptorGP@RaptorGP Жыл бұрын

  • Amazing

    @yzzxxvv@yzzxxvv Жыл бұрын

  • 24 Jassms on a single B-one! Damn we need to build another non stealth bomber. Something simple, affordable, fast and reliable.

    @ghostmourn@ghostmourn Жыл бұрын

  • There's no such thing as overkill with Syria

    @kylen9954@kylen9954 Жыл бұрын

    • Don't we have some very Christian people/groups in the world that should be over there blowing building up?

      @stevenkidd6761@stevenkidd6761 Жыл бұрын

    • Why is everyone is testing Weapons in Syria some goes to Ukraine

      @liibaanhd805@liibaanhd805 Жыл бұрын

  • Nowadays not being so stealthy can be used as an advantage by being bait with a bite. Get the enemy to focus on what they can barely see and use a 2nd total stealth group that's much closer and remaining unseen to target sites that light up to start tracking the barely seen 1st group which then can continue on with less resistance after the 2nd total stealth group takes out the active air defenses.

    @bryandepaepe5984@bryandepaepe5984 Жыл бұрын

  • I want one!

    @gregniel@gregniel7 ай бұрын

  • Fun fact finland has the jassm as well

    @fingames3692@fingames36925 ай бұрын

  • The fact 25 of these fit inside a B1 highlights how huge that plane is

    @daniel_dumile@daniel_dumileАй бұрын

  • My favorite weapon to use on DCS World

    @greorith@greorith Жыл бұрын

  • Gives a new meaning to rainin' hell.

    @mythoughts5615@mythoughts5615 Жыл бұрын

  • Those Batman caps are so cool

    @huneidimohamed@huneidimohamed Жыл бұрын

  • Stealth bombers baby

    @ericclausen6772@ericclausen6772 Жыл бұрын

  • From America with love

    @HahaHaha-gq8ft@HahaHaha-gq8ft Жыл бұрын

  • Sweet!!!!!1

    @ChosenOne6666@ChosenOne6666 Жыл бұрын

  • They no longer need the B1 to launch these. They can now just yeet them out of the back of a cargo plane.

    @qtar1984@qtar198411 ай бұрын

  • I ordered two for my roof launcher on my truck.

    @troywalker8078@troywalker8078 Жыл бұрын

  • Teknologi Legend Video Is W O W

    @hadiyantojayadi4152@hadiyantojayadi4152Ай бұрын

  • Please make a video about space station

    @Tech.fam_5602@Tech.fam_5602 Жыл бұрын

  • BEAUTY OF B1 B LANCER

    @soldier-boy969@soldier-boy96911 ай бұрын

  • US: let me test the missle UA: give me to test the missle US: let us test the missle

    @andrerothweiler9191@andrerothweiler9191 Жыл бұрын

  • We can see you comin' from... everywhere away.

    @michaelstary3463@michaelstary3463 Жыл бұрын

  • In the blue sky and white clouds, the war eagle spreads its wings, paying tribute to the heroes who defended the motherland! 蓝天白云，战鹰展翅，向保卫祖国的英雄们致敬！ I love you ! 我爱你 !

    @user-rn9pq8tz1n@user-rn9pq8tz1n Жыл бұрын

  • I assume the 2250 pound number is how much the entire missile weighs with both the propellant and the warhead? If that number is just for the warhead itself, that is one huge warhead! 😮

    @noahater5785@noahater5785 Жыл бұрын

    • The warhead is most likely 1000 lbs.

      @jamesorsby7553@jamesorsby7553 Жыл бұрын

    • @@ericclausen6772 That's what the narrator said in the video about this particular cruise missile's warhead. Tomahawk cruise missiles carry a 1000 lb warhead too, but they're not as stealthy as this one.

      @jamesorsby7553@jamesorsby7553 Жыл бұрын

    • @@ericclausen6772 So that probably means the missile itself minus warhead weighs about 1250 pounds fully loaded with propellant, +/- 50 pounds if the guidance system it uses adds a small amount of extra weight.

      @noahater5785@noahater5785 Жыл бұрын

    • Yes, the standard range AGM-158A, and extended range AGM-158B are 2250lbs total weight with 1000lbs warhead. However, there is an extreme range variant aka AGM-158B-2 That weighs 5000lbs with a 2000lbs warhead. It's a beast!

      @user-dq3jk9py4q@user-dq3jk9py4q Жыл бұрын

    • ​@@user-dq3jk9py4q the 158b2 is the jassm-xr? And at 5k lbs, wow its a big boi!

      @ElToronski@ElToronski Жыл бұрын

  • Us ammo and fuel depotsbare the ones on legitimate targets for strikes by others missiles would be really nice to get Us to this level of extinction

    @georgenzioki@georgenzioki Жыл бұрын

  • Take out their surface to air missile's first all of them

    @ericclausen6772@ericclausen6772 Жыл бұрын

  • المشاركات في عمليات الحرب العالمية وتشغيل النشاطات والعمل على المذيد والمذيد من غارات جوية وتوزيع غارات

    @user-uc4uz8zv5j@user-uc4uz8zv5j7 ай бұрын

  • Hi guys, what is the name of that launcher/missile at 7:52?

    @xPetyr@xPetyr Жыл бұрын

    • Bastion-P

      @jagdcent3403@jagdcent3403 Жыл бұрын

    • @@jagdcent3403 Thanks!

      @xPetyr@xPetyr Жыл бұрын

  • can't deploy that armament without those jammers baby...

    @Daponics89@Daponics898 ай бұрын

  • JASSM.... can it provide free health care too? Now that would be a serious bang for the buck!

    @paulgreen7906@paulgreen79069 ай бұрын

    • Free healthcare cant kill russians

      @KingSpittusFactus@KingSpittusFactus8 ай бұрын

  • Look at those sailors faces when they saw missile launch they’re probably saying in their minds this one launch was a million words

    @allanthomas332@allanthomas332 Жыл бұрын

  • Lethal!!!!

    @user-co8uy5rb2s@user-co8uy5rb2sАй бұрын

  • This ERA is Hypersonic missile technology not that outdated missile technology of USA

    @Wargamer_Asian@Wargamer_Asian Жыл бұрын

  • UKRAINE NEED THESE WEAPONS

    @juhat5123@juhat5123 Жыл бұрын

  • Jazzumed it's load

    @Tyler.i.81@Tyler.i.81 Жыл бұрын

  • I had been thinking about a flapless design, by using manoeuvrable weights inside the missile's structure. Possibly also useful for a hypersonic missile design.

    @JoeyBlogs007@JoeyBlogs00710 ай бұрын

    • Like inertial wheels on satellites?

      @PissFighter@PissFighter10 ай бұрын

  • I'll take 3.

    @karsonball2619@karsonball2619Ай бұрын

  • That is only ... so nice and friendly! A good boy...! 😱 👻😇😂

    @abuturab1589@abuturab1589 Жыл бұрын

  • Ouch

    @2coryman@2coryman Жыл бұрын

  • This is what took out the Kerch Bridge, went off a bit early but still did a decent job

    @Kealen69@Kealen69 Жыл бұрын

    • That explosion was massive - this missile is not capable of it by simple physics of the size of its warhead.

      @CellarDoorCS@CellarDoorCS Жыл бұрын

  • Its ashamed they knew months in advance when, where and how we were approaching the target.

    @paulhewson4600@paulhewson4600 Жыл бұрын

    • Yes, because Syria was just full of "bad guys." Let me guess, you believe Iraq had WMDs and building 7 collapsed from a small fire.

      @ruthnoya8424@ruthnoya8424 Жыл бұрын

    • I think it was a message to Russia, to show them they won’t be able to intercept them if they can’t see them

      @joshua7999@joshua7999 Жыл бұрын

  • So that attack probably cost about 30 to 50 million dollars or so?

    @Theduckwebcomics@Theduckwebcomics Жыл бұрын

  • I’m not against advanced weapons obviously, but why do the older aircraft like the B1B, F15, F16 and A10 , who were all to be cancelled, still hold up the fundamentals of US air power? There are many others who do those roles, but can they do them as well? In your face, have this, no quarter given. Boom. Technology might be interesting, but getting the job done is more important.

    @level1804@level1804 Жыл бұрын

  • 🎉🎉🎉

    @user-xz1qt2ib5w@user-xz1qt2ib5w8 ай бұрын

  • It's amazing how people think of building these weapons . Is this the same missile that can be used in the rapid dragon launcher

    @grantbriggs3777@grantbriggs3777 Жыл бұрын

    • It is.

      @pekkapeltonen7945@pekkapeltonen7945 Жыл бұрын

    • This and its anti-ship version, lrasm

      @ElToronski@ElToronski Жыл бұрын

  • It cost several million which more expensive than any target it intended to hit

    @ruyuchen2378@ruyuchen2378 Жыл бұрын

  • 👍

    @miroslavUnimog@miroslavUnimog Жыл бұрын

  • 19 JASSMs... does that qualify as a "swarm"? "...3 meters...": 9 feet; horseshoes, hand grenades and nukes... close 'nuff

    @johnhopkins6260@johnhopkins6260 Жыл бұрын

  • USAF should retire it's aging fleet of B-52 Stratofortress long range strategic bomber . . . and stick to upgrading the B-1M Lancer multi role strategic bomber . . . not to mention the B-2 Spirit stealth long range strategic bomber . . .

    @chandrachurniyogi8394@chandrachurniyogi8394 Жыл бұрын

  • If only Bone wasn't goldplated by The Pentagon... It could have been something amazing.

    @csr4043@csr4043 Жыл бұрын

  • LRASM

    @java1221@java1221 Жыл бұрын

  • Is the missile hypersonic?

    @Stuff749@Stuff749 Жыл бұрын

    • no

      @alexmoss3695@alexmoss3695 Жыл бұрын

    • Not even close; It doesn't need to be, IF IT Hides from Radar! Btw, the B-1, as Big as it is, shows-up, radar-image-wise, at about the size of a Red-Tail Hawk, from head-on (and wings swept-back), but, it's not "stealth" like an F-117, which is, head-on, Hummingbird-sized in radar return.

      @ericbrammer2245@ericbrammer2245 Жыл бұрын

  • And Basar Al Asad still on power 😂

    @muhtasimsowmic8116@muhtasimsowmic8116 Жыл бұрын

  • China, say hello to my little friend 😗

    @georgevanwallendael3990@georgevanwallendael3990 Жыл бұрын

  • Its hilarious that all this is real.

    @NikkoOrtiz1@NikkoOrtiz1 Жыл бұрын

  • It would be really nice to equip them with a nuclear warhead.

    @stevendegiorgio3143@stevendegiorgio3143 Жыл бұрын

  • na'alatullah alazzaalimiin

    @OroCover@OroCover Жыл бұрын

  • It's terrible what's happened in Syria so much history and culture turned violent in a supposed age of understanding.

    @first-thoughtgiver-of-will2456@first-thoughtgiver-of-will2456 Жыл бұрын

  • Have they know about this.... the movie "Top Gun:Maverick" would've NEVER happened!!!

    @LuisMendoza-pp9qi@LuisMendoza-pp9qi Жыл бұрын

  • The AGM 178 has a range of 760 miles...fyi

    @rburnett6266@rburnett6266 Жыл бұрын

  • These missles are the reason combat simulations of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would fail over 90% of the time. The invading fleet is sunk by stealth cruise missles.

    @wolfvale7863@wolfvale7863 Жыл бұрын

    • Rapid Dragon!

      @ElToronski@ElToronski Жыл бұрын

    • How do you intend to launch these missiles without coming near to China's sea border?

      @litchi4507@litchi45075 ай бұрын

    • @litchi4507 The missles have ranges of 2,400 kilometers or 1,500 miles and did I mention they are stealth? They look smaller than 10cm² on RADAR. Chinese military knows this even if you do not. That is why they would "prefer" a peaceful solution because there is no workable military solution available to China.

      @wolfvale7863@wolfvale78635 ай бұрын

    • @@wolfvale7863 bull Its range is about 1,000 km or 600 miles.

      @litchi4507@litchi45075 ай бұрын

    • @litchi4507 If you say so. What is the range of Chinese waters again, 200 nautical miles?🤷‍♂️ Conducting autonomous targeting, relying on onboard targeting systems to independently acquire the target without the presence of prior, precision intelligence, or supporting services like Global Positioning Satellite navigation and data-links. These capabilities will enable positive target identification, precision engagement of moving ships, and establishment of initial target cueing in extremely hostile environments. The missile is designed with counter-countermeasures to evade hostile active defense systems. It can not be jammed, and it will evade anything you shoot at it. Did I mention it was stealth?

      @wolfvale7863@wolfvale78635 ай бұрын

  • Now just imagine how much more devastating these things would be if they had similarly sized nuclear warheads instead of conventional explosives for warheads, you could probably wipe an entire small-ish country completely off the face of the earth if that was the case!

    @noahater5785@noahater5785 Жыл бұрын

    • You’re not supposed to say the quiet part out loud, buddy. 😅

      @AnhTrieu90@AnhTrieu90 Жыл бұрын

    • We alone have enough to destroy the world twice over and can't think of any reason we would need more than we already have

      @ericclausen6772@ericclausen6772 Жыл бұрын

    • Why would you want to imagine that? The average person in the world just wants a job/career, a house and to provide for a family. All wars are banker wars, with bullies bullying the weaker countries (Syria, Iraq, Libya, etc). I'd rather nuke DC, wall st, Moscow, London, Frankfurt, Israel, Dubai, Riyadh, Beijing, Shanghai, etc.

      @ruthnoya8424@ruthnoya8424 Жыл бұрын

    • Well we definitely have the capability to make mini nukes even smaller than that new missile variant seen in video. It's because of the nuclear agreement that they don't but we could outfit not all but a good majority of missiles with nuclear warheads..

      @ultragoldcoin8780@ultragoldcoin8780 Жыл бұрын

  • I must say, l'm glad, that the oldest democracy, USA 🇺🇲, is the strongest, and our, Czech 🇨🇿 ally in NATO, we are on the right side, freedom is not free(It's a cliché but it's true) and our politicians deeply underestimated it, times are changing, we must and we do rearm from Soviet weapons to fully NATO, there's no other way about it! We are buying American helicopters, Swedish infantry vehicles, German Leopard 2 tanks and our new jet fighters will be most likely F35s

    @karlvonbahnhof6594@karlvonbahnhof6594 Жыл бұрын

    • 🇺🇦🤝🇨🇿🤝🇺🇲

      @giant9101@giant9101 Жыл бұрын

  • Your going to have them go even further by dropping them at altitude and an extended range

    @ericclausen6772@ericclausen6772 Жыл бұрын

  • Long live America🇺🇸 🌏🐘🦄🦅🦁🐯👌💐✌👈👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

    @khukiyeyepthomi9977@khukiyeyepthomi9977 Жыл бұрын

  • The rusians are upset because US helps Ukraine in the Ukraine - rusia war ... but here rusia helps a country against US ...

    @icervoid@icervoid Жыл бұрын

  • So why show this long range stealthy missile and how it is deployed? I'm just saying.

    @erichvonmolder9310@erichvonmolder9310 Жыл бұрын

  • 👍👍👍

    @jenuilmajulus5586@jenuilmajulus5586 Жыл бұрын

  • эээээээээх, вот подсуетили бы Украине такого вооружения. это было бы идеально

    @vvv9142@vvv9142 Жыл бұрын

    • Поддерживаю 🤝

      @user-ox5ny2ye2m@user-ox5ny2ye2m11 ай бұрын

  • Why USA doesn't have maritime bomber..? Because it is protected by huge pacific and atlantic ocean?

    @gautammisra2741@gautammisra2741 Жыл бұрын

  • 👑🇺🇲🇺🇦🤝🤝 2023 !

    @renatobrito3455@renatobrito3455 Жыл бұрын

  • Way to win world war

    @danielhabte7847@danielhabte7847 Жыл бұрын

  • Weapons systems Ukraine can but dream about, Unfortunately. SLAVA UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 SLAVA UKRAINIANS 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

    @dereckjtbear2175@dereckjtbear2175 Жыл бұрын

  • Bien trabajo esa bomba manda la a ucraña gue use para la vida putin gue bien grasias

    @pablodixon5888@pablodixon5888 Жыл бұрын

  • Please give these to Ukraine.

    @apojoga@apojoga11 ай бұрын

  • LRASM's & JASSM's my NIZAZM's

    @Mr.Deleterious@Mr.Deleterious Жыл бұрын

  • ❤ Зачем вы, Европейкая цивилизация,, позволили раковой опухоли расти?

    @goodbye.ml.goodbye@goodbye.ml.goodbye2 ай бұрын

  • Damascus types of defenses are obsolete

    @2coryman@2coryman Жыл бұрын

  • HOLLYWOOD,,,, HOLLYWOOD,, HOLLYWOOD

    @jeanschaeffer4225@jeanschaeffer42258 ай бұрын

  • Why did you waste fuel to just take out two buildings cause Im sure they have more interesting targets then that and next time don't warn them and take out the minds that make the chemicals

    @ericclausen6772@ericclausen6772 Жыл бұрын

    • It’s usually who is inside the building that my government would send satan it self if they could, To rid the world of a snitch.

      @Ola4family@Ola4family Жыл бұрын
KZhead