Taking a look at what The Amazing Spider-Man 3 would have been about, plus Sony's plans for their Spider-Man Cinematic Universe.
⏱️TIMESTAMPS⏱️
0:00 Intro
0:28 Spider-Man Cinematic Universe
1:08 The Sinister Six
3:52 The Amazing Spider-Man 3
5:23 Mary Jane
6:31 Dr. Richard Parker
7:11 Spider-Verse Phase One
8:35 Amazing Spider-Man: Kraven
9:49 Spider-Man 2099
10:10 Venom
10:21 Black cat
10:34 Carnage
10:58 Andrew Garfield
13:53 Sony's Spider-Man Universe
🔴 Subscribe for more videos just like this: shorturl.at/atCD9
Poster art by ArtOfTimeTravel
/ artoftimetravel
#spiderman #marvel #andrewgarfield
Shoutout to ArtOfTimeTravel who designed the incredible poster used in the thumbnail. You can find him on Instagram here: instagram.com/artoftimetravel
TASM3 is coming out in summer 2024
Could you make one on a canclled godzilla movie like tristars original plan for their godzilla movie form 1994 by the dpeed directro dan debont
Come on sony....you can still finish this trilogy. Garfield deserves one more go...
🤞🏻
#AviAradOut
Please no 🙏 Garfield’s version is the worst spiderman iteration
@@Natak222I found his acting very cringey. Like when he is talking to Harry Osborne and randomly climbed over a fence. Or when he discovers his powers in the first movie and screams the whole time.
@Natak222 I won't lie...amazing spiderman 2 is my favorite spiderman after no way home and I'll die on that hill. So...god...please ignore that previous reply. 🙏
Woah, those Sony execs' planning is the equivalent to a kid with ADHD on a sugar rush inside a toy store.
Hahaha basically
#AviAradOut
Yep
They basically wanted too many things at once.
Thats an insult to sugar addled ADHD kids everywhere. 😢
I think Andrew Garfield fits Peter Parker’s personality better. He’s got a sense of humour, the suit fits him perfectly, he’s just one of the best spider-men in my opinion.
His Peter Parker feels to cool and to hip. Peter doesn’t have to be super nerdy, but at least the best of both personalities.
@@StraightEdgeKnight19thats the same thing everyone says that dont like him
@@John-Wack_DK You say that as if it's an invalid reason not to like him Now personally I love him and he's my favorite of the 3 but "that's what everybody says" does not make it a bad argument
AGREED
@@samstromberg5593 Who said it was invalid? Or a bad argument? You litterally just presuming stuff lol..
I really liked the idea of Spidey, Black Cat, Venom etc vs Carnage. I want Andrew back but the current Sony universe would just taint his legacy even more if he returned. If Tasm 2 had simply ended with Electro’s defeat and Peter not giving Harry his blood, we could have had a Goblin-lead Sinister 6 culminating in an even more built up death for Gwen. Or just keep Gwen alive since the Tasm Peter-Gwen relationship is just hands down the best On-screen Spiderman couple.
Unfortunately, I agree. Can't really bring it back no matter how much we really wish we could. The insult to injury is that Tom Holland's depiction is my least favorite overall. Harry becoming Goblin in a 3rd film would've definitely been superior to another fuster-cluck like the one we got. It could've even been done where Norman's head was still alive and talking in the jar; instructing Harry on what to do and/or being in the background "leading" the sinister six as THEY mentored a freshly Goblinized Harry. Gwen would instead die in the third film from the S6 (or at least the beginnings of them) overwhelming Peter on his own, but to counter it, you could also get the MJ introduction as well as possibly have Richard Parker come back into the mix, and if they wanted to tie in the MCU, or tie TASM into the MCU, they could have him be an agent of shield or something that was under witness protection, and his existance/status as alive was leaked when Natasha Romanov went public with the Shield/Hydra info dump on the net as a result of the events of Captain America: The Winter Soldier. Also, yeah. TASM Peter-Gwen is only really rivaled by ATSV Miles-Gwen.
@@Drunken_Hamsterit’s not a rival to miles at all they both love two different Gwen’s so stop no debate
@@hotmcfly9247 I'm not saying the individuals are rivalling for the affection of the Gwens, I'm saying TASM Peter x Gwen is as good as ATSV Miles x Gwen in terms of ships. The fact that the two Gwens ARE from different universes and nobody has to fight over which character GETS Gwen is just the icing on the cake. Literally, both ships can exist simultaneously and nobody has to fight over it; everybody wins.
@@Drunken_Hamster exactly Ty for saying that some people don’t get it
Just let him develop a formula that brings Gwen back to life in 3, I really like the goblin fight in 2.
Definitely goes to show that there are people in Hollywood wanting to make great movies. It’s just that there are other people that are wanting certain things out of the industry that slow down/post pone amazing things for us to see.
💯
Exactly blame Kevin feige
i mean, this industry depends on the box office to exist so
Yes, there are some that want to make a movie, while there are others want to make a product.
in this case I think Hollywood was right for shutting it down
That sinister six script is BONKERS! I watched an extensive breakdown on it once. Seriously weird. They didn’t have the rights to a certain island because it was tied up with X-men over at fox so they were trying to work around it. Not gonna lie, I don’t think we’re missing much with that one
Yeah I debated how much detail to go into. It’s a nutty script. And the rights issue was pretty funny too as they didn’t know if fox or marvel owned it.
@@Bulletsandblockbusters I think you covered it enough. It’d be a pretty long video on its own. It kinda sounded like a decent F4 script, or X-men, but odd for spider man.
I agree with Garfield and Shailene on this one; this thing of having a script and changing it by adding more ideas for fan service, you end up with an incoherent story and TOO MANY characters. I get it, it would have panned out into seperate movies, but WOW! I mean, resurrecting Gwen only to kill her again? 👀 Nah bro 😂 What?! Let's see how Kraven turns out. It may be rated R, but... the story has to make sense bro.
Agree 100 percent.
That scene of Peter going to group therapy so he could heal properly is such a beautiful scene that many people related to it. Even heroes suffer from traumatic experiences, and in Amazing Spider-Man we saw Peter suffering from grief and loss (maybe could be a prolonged brief if the series continued). But unfortunately will never happen even though it could have been included. It really shows the team of the series had a plan and it was in the good direction, but of course, Sony (corporation) had to screw everything up. Plus Andrew admitting that scenes made no sense really shows he cared about the project, and speaking of this it reminds me of the Witcher series (actors speaking about how a franchise goes in the wrong direction but then they are ignored). I hope Andrew comes back as Amazing Spider-Man again but with a great script (as he always deserved it) so we can have these ideas on the table. And please creators of the series fight back with everything you've got because your ideas matter.
The Richard Parker stuff is awful though. bringing him back was the script, not the studio right? And the studios plans were all over the place because they had no damn idea what they were doing.
You can always trace everything back to DEI. Why are movies doing so poorly now? DEI….why does the Witcher suck? DEI. Why will future movies suck until they learn that if you don’t hire the best person for the job your project will suffer? DEI
Giving Andrew’s spiderman the symbiote would have honestly made sense. Him getting the symbiote after losing Gwen? We’d see a more ruthless cutthroat spiderman. Who ends up getting snapped out of it someway somehow. Maybe by MJ becoming his new love interest? Or maybe him accidentally hurting aunt may or an innocent bystander due to his overagressive fighting. It definitelty could have been interesting had they gone that route
I think that's what was going to happen, because at the end of TASM 2 deleted scene that guy Mr fierce was walking by and you see venom symbiote and doc ock tentacles.
Advice to the studios. Don't plan out Extended/Connected Universes until you see the grosses.
Exactly. Like putting the cart before the horse. Focus on making a great movie.
Or don't constantly interfere with the vision
WB AND SONY MUST SEE THIS COMMENT
I think the MCU has built itself so high up that a lot of people trying to copy it forget it was a minor miracle it got to Phase 1 at all.
10:38-10:44 I think we all would’ve loved to have seen that as a giant Maximum Carnage style movie. Perhaps if they have a plan now they could attempt a similar thing with Venom and some of the spin-off projects that connect to Spider-Man and since the animated Spider-Verse movies can exist with the live action movies the possibilities are endless
Would be awesome but I think they killed carnage in the last venom film.
@@Bulletsandblockbusters Detective Patrick Mulligan is shown to be alive at the end with some sort of symbiote so there’s a chance Carnage lives on through a movie version of Toxin.
Such a shame we never got a third TASM movie.
#AviAradOut
It couldnt have been worse than the first two. Well, yeah, Gwen coming back, carnage, the savage land, time travel, it would have been worse. Thank god it never happened.
@@smithryansmithbut even if it was worse he'd still have a trilogy like everyone else but no cuz stupid raimi fans and just everyone in generally hating on tasm 2 even tho it wasnt bad and they just agreed and listen to everyone calling it bad
@@T3aseW1thease No I watched them and they were very bad. sorry if you liked them.
If they had brought one back, I wouldn't have been haunted by her death scene@@smithryansmith
I’m one of the five people who liked The Amazing Spider-Man 2 in 2014, and was excited for the sequel… and as it sounds like they would’ve been a lot of interference from Sony, I wish I could’ve seen Shailene Woodley as Mary-Jane and Felicia Hardy as Black Cat, I’m sure they would’ve had amazing chemistry with Andrew Garfield… Pun not intended lol
I like Tasm 2 as well not a perfect film but the chemistry between Peter and Gwen and the tragedy made me like it more than dislike it
I'm sixth lol
Not interference from Sony but Kevin feige . Get it right
@@Thdarkonex3except feige make it more worse within the foundation apart from storytelling
The character's name is Felicia Hardy, the actress's name is Felicity Jones
He should have gotten his trilogy 😢
#AviAradOut
@@Zombiesnyder13 That does depend. He was reportedly responsible for the "Sinister 5" in No Way Home and the Spot in Across the Spider-Verse.
@@maddenboseroy4074 but those movies worked because of Kevin Feige and Phil Lord and Chris Miller respectively
@@Zombiesnyder13 Lord and Miller didn't think of Spot and Feige took time to think about the "Sinister 5" in No Way Home.
@@maddenboseroy4074 is worth remembering that everything Arad does is strictly merchandise-driven For Feige, it took time to think about the Sinister 5, while in TASM2 and X-Men: The Last Stand, no one took time to think about how to give room for so many characters While for Spot, Lord and Miller didn't know at first how to fit him into the story, but they eventually pulled it out If they couldn't work it out, they would not have included Why you think Venom turned out the way it did in Spider-Man 3? Because Sam Raimi didn't wanted him in the story, since it already had Sandman and Green Goblin
A sinister six movie where Spider-Man is the “antagonist” would be great. You can make the sinister six relatable and sympathetic, while Peter try’s to stop them Peter becomes so blinded by self righteous that he forgets that these people are trying to survive or whatever else the plot needs. Then Peter will try to help them.
Thats sounds terrible
@@WhiteBoyTariq ah yes because a different take on something as simple as pov is terrible And what you don’t want villains who have a good reason for committing crime?
It's people like you that ruin comics.
@@foliagedcarcass9116that’s literally what Sony is currently trying to do with these Spider-Man villain movies, making them kind of anti-heros when they’re not. No one really cares about these movies except for maybe the Venom ones so that would definitely not be a big success
@@JunkieRemix yeah but they suck
Andrew is my favourite Spider-Man. I know people say his version is bad but thats because of the writing. He is my version of Spider-Man. He deserves a third movie.
He's a good Spider-Man but a bad Peter Parker, because he's too cool and edgy.
A Toxin Origin movie based on Venom vs. Carnage featuring Spidey and the return of Carnage would be a cool way to tie everything together and maybe give it some world expansion with a plot that explains how Symbiotes reproduce. A comedic cop fighting his symbiote’s predatory urges with the help of Garfield’s Spidey could have a buddy-cop vibe lol
That 5 movie plan was actually good in my opinion
Richard Parker could’ve been a clone. I think the comics did that once, with Harry cloning Peter’s parents to mess with him. That ending it too out of nowhere, though. Carnage Gwen is also from the ultimate clone saga. I’d like to see that.
I think another reason why they didn’t use Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man as the main Spider-Man in the MCU is because they couldn’t find a way to make the Amazing Spider-Man movies fit into the MCU canon. TASM 1 takes place in Manhattan in 2012, Avengers 1 takes place in Manhattan of that same year so storyline wise you can see how it doesn’t make sense, especially with no mention of the events of the Avengers in TASM 2 and the events of TASM 1 not being referenced at all in any phase 2 MCU movie
💯
Good point but they're different universes so timelines don't matter
Also avengers tower isn't in tasam 2
The editing is top tier and so on point, you encapsuled everything about the "would have been" universe of TASM beautifully
Wow, thank you!
I know the comic book version of Peter Parker, is famous for being “flippant and chatty’ during fights, as a defense mechanism for coping (something Tom Holland’s version, beautifully bruoght to life while figthing off Falcon and Bucky in Civil War)… I personally, have no issues with Andrew Garfield’s “Peter” being more emotionally grounded… He lost his parents at a young age, the only father figure he knew was murdered due partially to his inactions to stop a thief… he has experienced a lot of grief for a high school aged young man… His reaction in NO WAY HOME when rescuing Michelle, was perfect and beautiful, especially with fans knowing what it meant when he couldn’t save Gwen.
I must say that I like the sound of the big stand-alone Spider-Man vs. the Sinister Six movie. That would have been pretty cool. They could still make a movie like that. Everything doesn't have to be in continuity with everything else. Just look at the success of "The Batman". That movie was totally outside of the DCEU, or any other established DC Universe and it did pretty well.
Honestly, I can see why Sony scrapped it, there was just too much craziness mixed in with all their plans that I cannot really blame them from scrapping it. Also, the problem with a Sinister Six movie, is that unlike the cartoons and comics, it is hard to find a compelling reason for the villains to come together especially when they are so different. You notice that even in the Batman, they spent a significant amount of time setting up the Riddler.
It just wouldn’t work having to introduce a bunch of villains in one film, there was only rlly 2 in tasm 2 and it was already way too crowded
The main problem, predators like Avi Arad, Amy Pascal, and Tom Rothman will always reject and decline.
Why should that work if people didn't like spiderman 3 because it had too many villains in it? If 3 is "too many villains"then what's 6? I laugh at that...and I personally liked both spiderman 3 and TASM 2
@@tommyvercetti891 I think you are oversimplifying the issues with Spider-Man 3. I think this movie is too crazy too work but a Sinister Six movie could work if all the villains were written like stage 1 MCU villains, intimidating and scary but with no real character and there are plenty of Spider-Man characters who could be written like that without upsetting the fans.
Felicity Jones in a catsuit is the only reason I want to see TASM 3.
The poster on thumbnail is just amazing. It was a very unfortunate loss of potential ... I still have hopes for another Spidey movie from both Tobey and Andrew in the future .. what I'm thinking is bringing the two old Spideys to fight Venom in the 3rd movie!
I thought that Amazing Spider-Man 3 would have had Peter's new love interest be Falicia Hardy/ Black Cat. Like Tobey Maguire Spider-Man has Mary Jane Watson, Tom Holland Spider-Man has MJ, and Andrew Garfield Spider-Man has Black Cat. It would be different for the different universes.
Your videos are all next level. Concise, informative and entertaining throughout. Congratulations on your recent and future success
Wow, thank you!
The amazing spider-man 3 HAS to happen!!!
This is quickly becoming my favourite yt channel
Thanks!
I've been waiting for this one. Thanks.
Hope you like it!
Since so many of Spidey's rogues are legacy characters, I figured there would be two Sinister Six teams (there's been three Doc Ocks, three Vultures, four Kravens, two Rhinos, two Mysterios, ect). Have one be the fun anti-heroes and the other be villains.
The flood escape music plays in the background and I love it
The MonsterVerse is still my personal favorite shared universe 💯💯
They made 1 movie lol
@@Lance37a you smokin crack kid?? There's 4 movies so far, with a 5th coming out next year and others already in the works plus plenty of comics and some novels
@@Lance37aI believe the monsterverse is Godzilla
I want to see Spider-Girl, Kid Arachnid(Miles Morales) and Silk
I have a feeling Shailene Woodley would have been as perfect for MJ as Garfield was for Spider-Man and Emma Stone was Gwen. It sucks that we never got to see that. Also seeing black cat in live action would have been dope.
Andrew Garfield is easily my favorite actor to play Spider-Man. Having learned nothing from Spider-Man 3 and in a desperate move to capitalize on trend, Sony did him dirty
I Don't Have a Favorite Cause There All So Good I There Own Way But Andrew Definitely Got Robbed By Sony Hopefully He Gets His 3rd Movie But, If he doesn't I'm kinda.. okay with that but kinda not Cause I just want to see Andrew as Peter/Spiderman 🕷️🕸️ once again
Funny how Feige might have had a problem with Andrew's acting abilities and went with a bland actor like Holland
Think you for making this video😃 and Andrew Garfield deserves a third movie. #MAKETASM3
This series of movies sounds infinitely better than the state of the MCU
I remember watching this movie in theaters and felt that the story was incomplete. I was eagerly waiting for TASM3. Also if you guys remember there was a TASM2 video game which also teased a 3rd game featuring Chameleon and Kingpin in the post-credit scene. Hopefully Sony and Marvel decides to continue this universe.
All of this sounds like pure chaos lol
Andrew deserves a great third TASM film.
Here's how they finish it: Venom with the Eddie from the timeline (not Tobey's) and Black Cat introduction, I suppose.
Give us a Spider Man 3 with Venom, in two parts showing the struggle of Peter with the allure of the symbiote suit's power and the psychological impact on Brock and Peter's loved ones.
I just discovered your channel quite recently and i can't stop watching your videos. I think I've been binge-watching your content since this morning. Great channel!
Thanks!!! I’m thrilled that you’re digging the content. Welcome aboard!
It astonishes me how Sony has a big opportunity in front of them and are not seeing it: a combined Spider-Man 4 + The Amazing Spider-Man 3, featuring a double-protagonist duo with Tobey and Andrew, as two Spider-Man who team-up again against a Sinister Six kind of antagonist, or something like that. I don't think the audience wants to see individually each sequel, but combined, man... It could be cool. (Extra bonus: make Tom Hardy's Venom a third protagonist, if you want, they already developed him enough and the audience likes him.)
There was a video I saw which was basically what Spiderman 4 or TASM3(can't remember which one) would look like with both Tobey and Andrew as the protagonists, I'd love to see that
Fuck venom both those movies are trash 🗑
Wouldn’t that just be a repeat of NWH?
@@MarcoAce13 NWH is a movie about Spider Tom becoming the true Spider-Man, with the assistance of Tobey and Andrew appearing like 30 minutes before the end. I'm talking a full movie with Tobey and Andrew from beginning to end. They could fight Venom, I don't know.
That's not a bad idea but I will say I definitely wouldn't mind at all if they were their own films.
I just finished the Amazing Spider-Man 2 game on PS4 and I'd like to see what a third game would be like
Casting in the amazing Spider-Man is far superior to newest trilogy. Love to see them finish this.
Don't ask questions, just consume product.
Spider-Man was nothing without LAURA ZISKIN After she died during the production of TASM1, no one else was able to stop AVI ARAD from ruining everything again
Thank you for doing this! I really appreciate it. 😄👍
No problem 😊
It’s incredibly frustrating how much of a mess Sony made the Amazing Spider-Man franchise. They really went full chaotic.
I love the idea that Norman Osborn was surveiling Peter Parker from a young age and intentionally planning on him becoming spider man one day.. and that being the reason why Richard had to go and hide
animated spider-man is doing really well and while live action is objectively worse Andrew deserves another shot
"Sony realized they had no idea what they were doing" 🤣🤣🤣
After seeing Spider-Man: Lotus, I realized how good Andrew Garfield's Spider-Man really is, and after rewatching both, I think he deserves a third one.
i think a few of those movie ideas were unnecessary but the overall idea sounds amazing....we truly missed out I like tom but I loved andrew better tbh
I have always loved TASM 2, but I just don’t think TASM 3 would’ve been good in the way they were going to do it. The whole idea of cloning everyone who had died in the first two films would not have worked. It was just too soon. Also, Norman being a head in a jar was a stupid idea. They killed him off in 2. Should they have? That’s not for me to say, but they made that decision, and they made the decision to end the movie with him still being dead. They made a choice, and they should’ve stuck with it. Honestly, I think they should’ve focused entirely on Peter getting over Gwen, the Venom Symbiote making it even harder for him to connect with the people around him, and the Sinister Six coming into play. The clone saga and Norman’s resurrection should have been left out.
What you failed to mention is how Sony is treating Kraven ( a finished product) just like Morbius by pushing it back instead of just releasing it.
#AviAradOut
The video I was waiting for!!
If Marc Webb doesn't return for TASM3, then Sony should let PHIL LORD and CHRIS MILLER in charge If they let them produce the movie as well, they could save it from AVI ARAD, just like they did with SPIDER-VERSE
No but i actually feel bad for Andrew. He was the one who wanted spider-man in the MCU so badly to save the franchise. And then Sony and Marvel came to a deal. And Marvel actually was open to keeping Andrew as spider-man in the MCU. Sony was the one who decided to replace him. Andrew understood spider-man the best out of the three actors. He tried to get spider-man in the mcu to save the character bc he cared about the character. And then he got replaced.
It sounds SO bizarre: but its so weird that it loops back around to sounding fun (evil head in a jar, agent aunt May, symbiots bringing people back “wrong”, Gwen as Carnage, Spiderman 2099) It’s a bit like an extended “What If?” series
Just wanna say that your editing is very well done!! 👍🏻👍🏻
Thnx
I don't see the need for a Mary Jane in TASM, but they _could_ start a clone saga thing, with Professor Miles Warren (the Jackal) trying to clone Gwen after her death _(cuz in the comics, Warren had a pedophila crush on Gwen)._ I also see the possibility for Gwen to have spider-powers, as in the comics, Prof. Warren collected cell samples of all his students. A bit of Parker's spider-DNA gets mixed into Gwen's DNA sample, and the resulting Gwen clone gets spider-powers. Ben Reilly could probably be a thing here, too, and Prof. Warren, in order to attack Peter, _(cuz even the Gwen clone loves Peter, but has 0 feelings for Warren)_ he uses Dr. Connor's old research & becomes the Jackal _(in a similar way Connors became the Lizard)._ Sure, Venom could also be there as a secondary villain, but near the end, Spider-Man & Venom could team-up against Warren (cuz Venom isn't really a villain. He's the Anti-Hero known as the Lethal Protector) And Felicia Hardy _does_ exist in TASM, as she used to work for Harry Osborn, so Black Cat could be a thing, too.
But Andrew is from Earth-120703 while Venom is from Anomaly-688. Don’t think that could ever work fr
@@nadimls3672 Excuse me, ANOMALY-688??
@@venomfan2020 why i call it Anomaly-688: 1. being handled by a moron named Avi Arad 2. Vulture 199999 is officially part of 688 by force 3. Raimi Daily Bugle was supposed to be in Earth-96283, but somehow Avi just randomly puts the logo in 688 without explanation Therefore Earth-688 is Anomaly because of Avi Arad’s bullshit
I'm adapting movies into comics for fun of.course. and trying to make them more choseive from movies I was dissatisfied or disappointed. I recently did amazing Spiderman 2 change the writing. Motivations. Included M.j. and made the villains more memorable as well as adding the deleted scenes. ( the ones I deemed important. Peter's dad and all of that. ) I'm looking forward to see this video and maybe I'll do it. Thank you for you're videos.Probably gonna do an x-men 3 Bryan singer if I have the time. Thank you for you're channel.
Sounds like fun. I often imagine that sort of thing myself. And my pleasure. Thanks for watching!
@@Bulletsandblockbusters I wish I could upload them. Because some are better than others. I rewrote the multiverse of madness pretty cool and more r rated and they did travel to the multiverse and made clea and Nightmare as main villains. And Thor 4 in a much better way than the film in my opinion but yeah. It's pretty cool ,fun to me and keeps me creatively flowing so to speak. But thank you man you're Chanel is a sort of more motivation as to what to do. Keep it up 💪👍
Aunt May a spy? Gwen as Carnage? A resurrection formula? Good God…
The prequel sounds truly Amazing
This sounds like it could've been good.
Garfield has ALWAYS been my favorite Spider-Man, but I’m also happy with the way that Spider-Verse is currently goin’!
Some of these ideas and plans I would absolutely still love to see, and others I'm so glad never happened.
Yoooo this sounds like it would have been sooo sick!
I love your videos
Thanks!!!
Wow, ASM3 sounds like even bigger mess than the second film. Simple continuity would be fine without any dumb resurrections. Venom makes sense to amplify Peters rage but once Brock gets the symbiote his the perfect villain for 4. Venom standalone film is another stupid idea. Brock could team up with Peter to fight Carnage but only once their own fight already happened.
Another great video with a lot of insight 👍
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it!
they need to finish it. Garfield didnt age much. and TASM 2 was not as bad as most say. that movie is amazing
If Sony greenlits TASM3, they need to get rid of AVI ARAD first Or it will be just another failure
Give it to me Give it to me Give it to me More Andrew's spiderman pls
7:25 I distinctly remember seeing a rumored Aunt May film on IMDb back in the day and thought it was ridiculous as well. It was quickly removed when I tried to show my brother who thought I was making it up 😂
I like the first Amazing Spider-Man film because how different it is from the Raimi trilogy and I guess that the Raimi fans wouldn’t move from Spider-Man 4 and I was disappointed that Spider-Man 4 but I learned how to move on, because I had ideas for the MCU before Amazing Spider-Man 2 came out and I wanted Andrew Garfield to be the MCU Spider-Man like I was expecting the man in the shadow to be ether Mysterio,Roderick Kingsley aka the Hobgoblin or the real Norman Osborn and in the first movie Peter doesn’t seem to know the Osborns because he did steal a man’s identity to sneak into Oscorp and I get the impression that this Peter is one of those people who think corporations are evil so I think he would willing to try expose Norman as the monster he really is unlike Tobey would and like in Rocky 5 who may not be the most popular thing but there is a valid point where Rocky try to warn Tommy Gunn about people like George Washington Duke that is a vampire and that Andrew is not Tobey Maguire and Marc Webb is not Sam Raimi when are they going to that through their skulls so like it be it’s own thing like I highly recommend DJ Unlimited and Rinzler Amazing Spider-Man 2 rewrite. This MCU has become an obsession for Hollywood because there things that don’t work as cinematic universe and while I’m on this checkout this kzhead.info/sun/m5R8c5SnZ3WLoGg/bejne.html Also these are the same guys who wrote Star Trek into Darkness with this stupid blood on which why the Osborn are 💩on Peter’s because this thing is very flawed like I know I’m not a doctor but what happens if their blood type doesn’t match with Peter’s and I think the movie Chronicles way have a influence on this movie’s downfall
Fun Fact: The Man in The Shadows is called Gustav Fiers. He is actually a character in the comics. Look it up.
So you don't like Chronicle? And also why would you say that George Washington Duke is a vampire? That's makes no sense, there are not vampires in the rocky movies.
Kevin’s comments about TASM 2 just go to show how he is not at all watching over some of the recent MCU projects (Love and Thunder, She-Hulk, etc.)
Funny how most of these stories boil down to "they wanted what marvel had but were too dumb/greedy to do it right". Even Marvel is struggling at this point to keep a cinematic universe together! But thanks for another great video.
The only way I could see that "Formula that brings people back to life" plot ever working was if it featured the Jackal as the villain and it was an adaption of the clone saga.
I actually love theese ideas. Wtf sony.
I think that it would be cool to have Norman Osborn just be a head in like a mech kind of thing like Mr. Freeze in The New Batman Adventures. It would be cool, and it would have made him different from other Norman Osborn Goblins.
I hate that idea but to each their own!
This universe actually sounds amazing in paper!
nah... Imagine how crazy it would be that at the end of kraven we get an end credit scene of andrew
The planned film was wayyy too convoluted.
I love Andrew however can’t say I am interested in seeing the original ideas of the third movie
Love how captain Stacey's actor mentioned he might have been brought back as if he wouldn't first have brought gwen back, or if he could only use it once it was definitely gonna be gwen
"I stopped pulling my punches, I got rageful" Yea... that definitely was a teaser to TASM 3
Yo! I’m early af!
More proof that studios should just stop trying to emulate this bullshit of interconnected cinematic universe since they have no idea how to do it.
Damn, that Thanos transition insert was perfectly timed, i gotta hand it to you😄😄
that movie would be 3hrs but one of the best super hero movies ever
If Spider-Man 4 can be greenlit, so can The Amazing Spider-Man 3.
#AviAradOut
Wait, it's been greelit??
@@deepflare1028 Well, I don't know for sure. But Sam Raimi says he's open to it.
@@theonlyethanhiroshikithen that means no
Great video as always. This illustrates how out of touch and bizarre Sony is, especially with Spider-Man. A lot of these ideas, in my opinion, sound terrible. It’s also never a good thing to play catch-up with your cinematic universe. Reactionary story building never works, just like DC has shown.
Thanks and we’ll said. My thoughts exactly!
Both Sony and DC might have brighter futures than the MCU at the moment
@@daimonatkins3046No all three are on shaky waters. MCU continuity are all over the place & bad writing, DCEU is a reboot but isn’t but a soft reboot away from Snyderverse but is still part of it, and Sony keep making these solo movies no one asked for.
@@ta21lactually the spin off happened because of hate comments, therefore people asked for it instead of be quite😌
Omg that's sounded soooooooo good
Seeing all this come into fruition would have been interesting. But Sony had so much going on that they got lost
Because they’ve been mishandled by executive predators like Avi Arad , Amy Pascal, and Tom Rothman.
Venom 2 was a hit! Look at the box office through the Covid-19 lens. It did extremely well, and in so many ways, no matter the quality, paved the way for Spider-Man: No Way Home.