the Worlds FASTEST Desktop CPU for 3D Rendering - Threadripper 3990X
2020 ж. 9 Ақп.
95 303 Рет қаралды
How fast is the 64-Core Threadripper 3990X at 3D Rendering in Blender!?
Threadripper 3990X: amzn.to/2tQ3iPu
Ryzen 9 3900X: amzn.to/37grmZn
Ryzen 9 3950X: amzn.to/3bqsWLA
RTX 2080 Ti: amzn.to/31H9TrJ
Subscribe For More: kzhead.info_...
Instagram: / cg_geeks
Twitter: / cggeeks
Facebook: / cggeeks
ArtStation: www.artstation.com/artist/cg_...
#threadripper
It's not for everyone, but there are people who buy Mac Pro workstations, and a system with one of these in it costs less than the base model Mac Pro workstation, while drastically outperforming the highest end model (which you're going in the range of $50,000 to get) by a wide margin. So you're looking at a potential $5-6K machine that outperforms a $50K product.
I realize I am kinda off topic but do anybody know a good site to stream new movies online?
@Danny Royal Flixportal xD
@Vihaan Maximus thanks, I signed up and it seems to work =) I appreciate it !!
@Danny Royal no problem :)
Your voice sounds like kermit the frog and did you just use reversed psychology?
@Begin Transformation no he use Uno Reverse Card
"AMD has no competition at this level". ahh, i love it 😁
@@Eduwideos it's not about gamers
@@Eduwideos literally not for gamers lol
@@ProjectShinkai even if it isn't a gaming cpu monopolies aren't good
@@sirlimonada2 they don't have a monopoly. They basically just made an alternative to apple
@@Eduwideos dont show others that you are a fool
Dang, that's crazy ker-STEVE! Love your videos (:
Nice seeing you here Daniel
My CPU just crushed while watching this video...😥
Windows Task Manager programmers: "64 threads ought to be enough for anyone."
Its too bad I'll never afford it anyone wanna start a heist group? 😂
I'm down, we should start at Kermit's house, I hear he has some noice computer parts!
I'm in.
Let's go boiiis
I'm in
::sticks head in outta nowhere:: what we stealin?
Amazing information thanks for sharing 😊
My i5 6500 is crying at the corner
i3 👉
@@audriusbarauskis3498 Pentium G4560
Pfft, My Intel celeron n4000 is crying..
Ohh dude my i3 and GT 710 are brutally beaten
My same pressor but it's enough for me.
Why is there a suspicious white substance on your mouse mat?
haha its the mouse pad pattern. This one actually: www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0797BV97D/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o09_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 ;)
@@CGGeek Yeah sure, you won't weasel out of this one so easily!
@@CGGeek sure thing.
Omg!!! I can't wait to see the amazingness you come up with on this beast. Love your videos
Thanks for the great advice, just another video recommendation could you possibly do a video just specifically on making larger scale objects in Blender because I’ve been dealing with mostly small objects which kind of isn’t pushing Blender to it’s full potential if that makes sense. I’m sure it must take longer and more tools to learn but it would be fun! ❤️
The only useful and relevant video related to 3990x. I wish you also added resolution of each frame you render tested
Best 3990x review. Suscribed
thank you man
8:35 CG Ross Takes The Cake Here
You and the processor are both insane, keep it up!
well explained sir.
Very best explanation
Wow, what a fast CPU speed!
I would find it extremely interesting to see a cpu review based on real-world cpu-intensive tasks on blender such as boolean operations on high polycount models, stacks of modifiers, a routine sculpt, or other modelling/sim operations. It seems to me cpu rendering benchmarks are beside the point since most users have dedicated gpu's. And Blender is notorious for being very demanding on the cpu. Have you ever considered running these operations by team red and team blue in a 1 v 1 comparison?
wow, that $4000 cpu renders as fast as two $250 graphics cards! I'll take 2! :D PS, with nvidia gpu's it doesn't matter if a scene fits into vram anymore, because a lot of render engines including cycles now have out of core support, which means the gpu can receive new information during rendering at a slight performance hit. What features aren't supported in cycles by the GPU? The only one I can think of is OSL shaders (where you program your own shader nodes).
gpu rendering still doesn't look as good as cpu rendering when i compare scenes in vray cpu vs vray gpu. cpu still looks better and supports more features
@@leonardmitchell1903 depends on the render engine. Cycles produces identical results on both, it even lets you render with both gpu and cpu simultaneously on the same image.
@@3d-illusions vray let's you combine gpu and cpu as well..still feel like gpu is better for animation while cpu is better for stills. or let me put it this way: CPU is better, but GPU is not as expensive.
@@leonardmitchell1903 Try out Cycles and let me know if you feel that holds true for that engine 👍
@@3d-illusions my whole 3D asset library is over 1TB of data, cost me loads of money and time and is in 3dsmax+vray format, so i'm not switching anytime soon. VRAY also has a very good working biased mode with irradiance map instead of brute force and is therefore much quicker than cycles. just compared Vray CPU to VRAY GPU and results weren't consistent. just looks better on CPU.
I liked your video, very informative. I am in the process of building a Ryzen 9 3950x system using an Azrock Creative X570 mb with 128 GB of DDR 4 ram with a Radeon VII GPU, do you think it will be a little faster than your 1st gen Threadripper system or about the same when doing the same renders?
Hi Steve you forgot to put what resolution you were rendering at and what amount of samples and whether you were using denoising. Did AMD loan you that system for a review or they give it to you?
Why not test on Linux where it supports 128 simultaneous threads ?
1024 up to 4 billions.
show me proof
@@PunxTV123 For Red Hat linux for example you can use 24 tb of ram and 768 cores access.redhat.com/articles/1979103
Windows 10 Pro Workstation (and Enterprise) editions handle 256 threads although there are rumours of an update to Pro for the 3990x - currently Pro thinks it is a dual socket processor each with 64 threads max.
@@tma2001 latest rumor is the update crashed your pcs have a lovely time with the chimps in redmond this windows ten is a phone opertaing system and its complete garbage
cg geek is now a pc enthousiast
Love the way u suddenly over clocked ur hair on 0:40
So if I wanted to use zbrush for sculpting, substance painter for texturing and blender for rendering (without overclocking the CPU) what would be my ideal build? I was thinking something like 3900x for the core count but relatively high clock speed, 2080ti and some fancy motherboard that supports fast ram/ssd's (any suggestions here?)... Does this sound legit? What would you change/upgrade or even downgrade to cut down cost but still keep good performance?
When I see all of those cores working on a cycles render I can't help but think how slow cycles is. Those tiles should be moving so much faster.
Where did you get the 64 threads limit thing from? Any proofs on that? Nice video!
Did you try CPU +GPU rendering?, it would have been interesting to see those results too.
I want to sit there and watch this beast while rendering..
Unless you need a maximum of 256GB of RAM, the RTX Titan has similar render times at the cost of $2,500. $2,000 if you get the educational discount.
or going multi gpu with 2 x 2080Tis at the same price and better performance.
@@sniper1pk I would've suggested the 2080Tis but I thought the RTX Titan would be a better choice since it comes with 24GB of memory, also since most professional renders require above 12GB (such as the Gooseberry benchmark). For most users, it would work though.
I love your intro
What were the speeds when you ran CPU + GPU (Optix) Combined Rendering? Thanks.
you should make a second channel for tech stuff
I have the 2950X and it is insane ... seems this beast is not easy :-D
When comes the new Intro animation ? :)
I’m rendering my first scene that can’t be rendered on GPU even in hybrid. It runs into CUDA errors due to the resolution and texture res but renders fine on my CPU alone. My 1700 is in need of an update. Waiting patiently on Zen 3!
That's like The Flash in real life. WOW!!
I wonder if you have a training videos, or can recommend on how to learn Blender animation for making 30sec-2minutes Marketing videos? ( these are like a cartoon, stick figure animation ). thank you.
Wait, can you use BOTH the GPU and the CPU with Blender 2.8x? Did you try that? I would be curious to see the difference with both. I like my 6 core AMD (Ryzen5-2600) + 1050ti. When it comes to the bang for the buck, I think I made out okay. It would be fun to watch 128 threads though. I was happy with my 12 threads (compared to the 3 I used to have! LOL).
Great informative video. I'm no Blender expert, but doesn't Blender allow both CPU and GPU rendering at the same time? Would that make a difference in blender render times, compared to separate GPU and CPU render times? Anyways, great video and always a joy to watch.
It depends. Sometimes hybrid is better, sometimes GPU alone is better. I can’t even get my current scene to load in hybrid so it’s only CPU. It all just depends 👍🏼
@@thechannelitrollwith1645 Cuda renders FAR faster. If you use vray RTX renders _ridiculously_ faster. Threadripper is stupid unless you have very specific needs that can't be offloaded to the GPU. It's an expensive toy for most applications.
@@zodwraith5745 no, it's not stupid. It comes in handy for applications like houdini for heavy simulations for instance
@@tjseries3057 Like I said, only for specific apps that can't be offloaded to a GPU.
@@zodwraith5745 I see your point!
When Linus retires this guy will take over
If he gets sick again maybe he'll sound like Linus
haha good one lol
Would using VR content creation work on this (not playing VR games but creating content and animation in VR )?
Cool stuff! I’m really torn between the 32 and 64 core. Massive price differences and knowing which one I really need. I work with sets of around 100 million polys in blender. Big sets. I current run an Amd Ryzen 3900x 12 core with 64gb ram, but need something faster due to the scale of my scenes and the amount of images and animations I need to render ... as I’m making a prerendered myst style game. So I was looking at 64 core threadripper with 256gb ram, but is this overkill? Maybe a 32 with 128gb ram or perhaps a 64 core with 64 go ram or 128gb ram? It’s hard because I can’t test anything lol.
go with 64 cores 256gb ram as you render 100million poly so this should be good for you
8:15 a quadro rtx 8000 would be a better opponent
Can you please also include the number of samples in the graphs you show
Hello, really real word review. Thank you. What is the workstation configuration? How many gb's of memory and mother board was used? Thank you
Its the MSI Creator board for the 3990X chipset - paired with 64GB of 3600Mhz ram.
@@CGGeek Thank you very much for the quick answer.
didn't know a frog took over geek channel
press f3 and and search for it, or activate it from the add-ons, or eat 3 default cubes in the morning.
how does it handle 3d modeling (fusion 360) and what gpu do you suggest for light gaming (Minecraft, dungeons, fortnight, exe)?
actually I think you should have chosen a smaller tile size fornyour gpu benchmarks. with blender 2.8x gpu rendering might be faster at lower tile size
when is combined GPU and CPU rendering coming ?
So this is the perfect machine for heavy 3D rendering. Please advise.
sobs with a MacBook Air. :P
Hey CGGeek! So I’m considering a PC build that’s oriented mainly for Blender 3D rendering, and my GPU budget is around $1200-1500USD. Would you recommend buying multiple mid-range GPUs (like the Radeon RX 5700 XTs) or buying a single high-end GPU (such as the RTX 2080Ti)?
Snag the 2080 Ti, you can use RTX to accelerate your renders, it's usually 30-40% faster than CUDA GPU rendering
stay away from any AMD GPU for rendering or acceleration related stuff. Period. they are pretty much dead on arrival when it comes rendering. literally all mainstream GPU renderers (octane, redshift, vray gpu) are CUDA/RTX only and even blender's cycles prefers cuda over openCL.
i have a 1950x...should i upgrade??? 4x higher rendering speed sound tempting.
WoW a new threadripper... also reviewed by Kermit the frog!
Curious if any systems with the TR 3990x will get ISV certified.
Hi i want to ask , does the new ryzen 4000 is better for 3d rendering than intel 9th and 10th gen? I want to by new laptop for 3d rendering but still dont know which is better processor 🤷♂️ 🤷♂️
Wow show us more..
Where can I buy the complete system
Your voice sounds like Kermit the frog.
oh you
That's Jordan Peterson
Ok, now I am crying...
Now a Linux benchmark ?
nice T-shirt
Y is ur mouse pad on the left 🤔🤔🤔
And I still with my legendary FX 6300
does it depends on what kind of mother you have as well for speed or no?
Help guys: when i use the track to constraint, my object snaps out of the original position and doesn’t track on the direction I want it to. How can I fix this?
I have 3990x with 128gb 3600mhz trident z. I just bought another 128gb trident z neo 3600mhz.
I guess it's time to upgrade my Intel E6550 CPU. :)
damn...
Intel is for playing games . . . . AMD is for building games💯
This CPU has no Authorization of existence. For big Scenes, you can just use out of core rendering which Blender doesn't have a jet but might in the future. But Octane render which is very similar and also available for Blender has it.
How do rendering speeds compare to, lets say, the rtx 3060?
You render on RTX 2080 or threadripper ?
You would need like 400 TR 3990X to render Toy Story. 3D animated films utilize so much processing power.
I got a Ryzen 3 1300x, I wonder how much time it will take to render some scenes...
imagine when Renderman will comes with XPU...
4:26 explain it. what is resolution what is samples. or is this default open that file and render noh becouse its default 32x32 tile 35 samples. or is it my blender default not in file.how can compare things when it not same.i can use 10 samples and its super fast then blur it look same as longer render lol
What is your tile size on Bob Ross scene?
Can you do it again rendering in CyclesX !?
Me lo voy a comprar
hmm Victor benchmark 1950x 15m 33s my new 3950x 10m20s :D yeee
Me: its time to upgrade my A10 My wallet: nah.
can you do a pc build for this
How to render as fast as a Threadripper: render at 720p, then upscale to 4k
buy a 3990 and use GPU to render it ᶘ ͡°ᴥ͡°ᶅ
When I render with my GPU it doesn't just use the GPU, actually it just spreads the workload on the GPU and CPU. Im doing two renders right now, both with GPU. Im using 48 % of the GPU and 93 % of the CPU. Do your research at least before commenting.
@@ale-pg3xb You're both a bit wrong. It depends if you checkmark your CPU, your GPU or both.
@@automatic241 look at the file, I just want to prove my point. drive.google.com/open?id=1ewoBMZ29dch0HgMUrrx581Z-hlwbvJck
@Thomas Jonson Ok Maybe that could be better for blender but the CPU is still a beast for CPU hardware and very useful in many other applications.
what happens when you run 2080 and threadripper together?
GPU is the future for Render, my 2080Ti render BMW at 22 seconds with OptiX, but GPU have some limitations :/
For me the biggest limitations is ram when it comes to GPUs that and a few other things, i very often use in the range 10-16 gigs of ram, sometimes in the 20-24 gigs range.. with modifiers and the like it really eats ram. Meaning my 8 gigs GPU is out of the question sadly.
@@rodovanra6783 "modifier"...hmm 3ds max?
for sure. but ram "stacking" is in the works already and given how some software are now managing memory and workflow techniques(at least in Houdini) , GPU rendering is the way forward. Which in a way shows the 3990x is solving a problem that wont exist in a few years.
How about a blender fluid sim bake on the 3990x?
How do AMD graphics cards (5700 - 5700xt vs Nvidias offerings) handle blender. Should people aim for Nvidia vice AMD if using Blender. Your in-site would be great. thank you..
Rob Estey AMD is pointless for GPU rendering. cycles supports opencl and cuda(Nvidia) but cuda performance is much better than opencl. every other gpu renderer (redshift,octane..) is cuda only. besides u get opencl with nvidia too and ironically, AMDs own gpu renderer RenderPro works faster on nvidia gpus :D
what cooler are you using ??
Maybe it would be even better with dual TITAN RTX and NVlink? 48 Gb memory and certainly faster and if you can live with a cheaper "non-threadripper"-system if would be about the same price. Of course you have to live with "only" 48Gb of memory though :-)
Wait, does GPU perform better like using one thread? I tried using all threads I have versus one thread. And GPU performed the best with one thread... SO WHATS THE POINT RENDERING WITH 128 THREADS AND GPU???
So here is a newbie question. I am aware that Blender can use both CPUs and GPUs to render. At this level of CPU power, do GPUs even matter? In this machine featured in this video, what kind of video cards are installed? Are they even used for rendering of just monitor display? Thank you! :)
yes because this CPU is still 2x slower in GPU rendering than 2080ti BUT you need one if you wanna have multiGPU system
@@atottalynormalcat939 Ahhh, gotcha! Thank you for the clarification!
What about benchmarks using linux?
immagine the 3990x with some rtx 8000´s ... would crush anything.