V-Tail Pushers for Long Range FPV - Design & Performance Comparisons
Пікірлер
A youtuber made an RCPLANE that still flying for 7h !!! I dont remember the Chanel but it very crazy but your plane is crazy to continue like that :D
@Theofficialsokt7 ай бұрын
Search in your history
@shashankmurthy25216 ай бұрын
Rctestflight? I know he made a delta wing which was covered in solar panels which only started using the battery after it got dark.
@atrumluminarium6 ай бұрын
He isn't a youtuber who happens to make an RC airplane. He is an engineer who happens to make youtube videos.
@sinefinehabitarevolo6 ай бұрын
@@atrumluminariumrctestflight did this. Only a German university group did more, with a 72 hour flight (atlantik solar I think?)
@pauljones91506 ай бұрын
@@pauljones9150 Oh, I haven't seen that. I'll check it out :)
@atrumluminarium6 ай бұрын
Earned yourself a sub. One of the coolest long range FPV channels.
@s__s_62422 ай бұрын
Amazing performance. So efficient with that foam board wing - excellent craftsmanship
@senorjp212 ай бұрын
Man am i glad i found your channel. One love, man.
@aotrakstarАй бұрын
Drag reduction alone will not get increased range, if the wing can produce less lift. Because the ability to carry a large battery is also a factor in the range. Distance optimization is the goal. commercial airliners and bombers tend to go on the speed side of the distance optimization for a variety of reasons, including because they may be shot at, the customers are impatient, the aircraft may be needed elsewhere, or there may be headwinds to penetrate. The only exception is if runway requirements cannot be met, then a slower aircraft is used. think dehaviland twin otter or DHC-2. Personally as a design choice, I would move to a slightly thicker wing, and you would be surprised how much more weight in battery it can carry. most RC planes only can carry half or less of the battery that they can after a wing mod. you may be able to extend the wings too. that gets more wing area, but also a better aspect ratio. any weight that you increase in spar size will be more than made up for, in increased efficiency. keep using a single carbon tube spar. find a way to glue a rib to it every now and then, so that you can take advantage of the ability of the carbon tube to resist torsion, and then you can make the structure lighter on the skin, because that no longer has to resist torsion. then you get the weight Back that way, that you spent on the longer wing. the aerodynamic noise that you refer to in gliding flight, is not a good thing. One method of reducing drag of a design in a wind tunnel is to move a microphone around the plane while the wind tunnel is moving air at speed over the surfaces, and locate elevated acoustic areas. That can identify inefficiencies, and verify that they have been improved. the increased distance between the prop and any surfaces in front of it is very good. again, the acoustics prove it like you say. in theory, the increased motor stator diameter will result in increased efficiency. So since you have a pusher, might as well use a motor with a diameter as large as the fuselage. the closer you can get to that, the better. try going up in pitch, to a 12 x 8 prop, or so. or even 12 x 10. you should notice a difference in efficiency. even in slow flight, the reduction in motor RPM is very advantageous for achieving same thrust with less blade tip drag penalty. So, when you switch to LI ION, please check and make sure your ESC's can continue to operate normally down to a very low voltage. I'm using Castle ESC's and using the Castle Link USB/ adaptor and their software, it's very easy to set low voltage cut off to 5V. You can go down to 2.5V per cell on the Li Ion, but beware of the power you lose when gong below 3V per cell, as the airplane may be able to say aloft, but probably cannot safely perform a go-around at those low voltages, so make sure you have a good landing site ready. most ESC's can only be brought down to 2.85V or so, if they are programable for low Volt cut off. and make sure you don't experience a soft cutoff it ground testing and think the battery is just getting low, or not notice at all. a soft cutoff will bring down the plane just the same as a hard cutoff. well, those are my two bits of advice. your planes look great! Nice flying!
@FPVREVIEWS7 ай бұрын
Servos in front of the tail are not covered with any aerodynamic surfaces, it creates turbulence which is not good
@dominiq43437 ай бұрын
Thanks very much. I’m learning a lot! The aluminum (1m) spar is the only option I currently have to support the XPS wing. But once a 10x750mm or 10x1000mm carbon tube is in stock, It’ll replace the aluminum spar. I’ve flown Li-Ions before but have to get used to their way of dropping down in voltage because their nature is to drop under ‘relatively’ low current. iNAV has a parameter that calculates the sag-compensated voltage, which I’ll use, along with actual battery voltage.
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
80cc
@michaelmousseau66247 ай бұрын
Sailplanes. They are now getting over 60 to 1. The size of the engine is then dramatically reduced.
@adenwellsmith69086 ай бұрын
Sailplanes do not have to carry large batteries or large amounts of fuel.Having to do so changes the optimization. @@adenwellsmith6908
@FPVREVIEWS6 ай бұрын
Sticking to a single design and improving it, its much better than hopping between designs and hoping to find a better platform. Honestly I'm getting similar range and flight time on a wing based design, but nothing inline with the price point of your foam build design. So with lots more $$ invested getting further and longer flights isn't always a reality. Well done, and thank you for sharing your experience, building technics, and performance of the models
@TheJohanJonker7 ай бұрын
man another super interesting video. Thanks for taking the time to so clearly show everything you were explaining.
@MaxR526 ай бұрын
Great comparison and overview with clear explanations. Great flight video too.
@AerialWaviator7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the information and demonstration, I look forward to using a similar design with lethal ordinance to do some stuff to some people.
@yakivpopavich6 ай бұрын
Well done Sir,all work done by yourself is indeed a great effort,thankyou for posting
@M-H4336 ай бұрын
nice, always like the VTail & pusher Planes 🖖
@mho...6 ай бұрын
Always a great video. Thanks
@NOXFPV7 ай бұрын
I always love your video ❤, Thanks for Sharing
@IsahTech7 ай бұрын
I love this type of content although I guess you realized along the way you've reinvented the famous reaper drone design 😊
@badassdrones7787 ай бұрын
beautiful work man
@tubsucks7 ай бұрын
I built your Silver Guardian, and it flies like a dream, with a SpeedyBee F405 Wing FC and Arduplane! If anyone doubts how well these planes fly, I can testify how good they are. I have not done a distance test yet, but flying with a basic 3300 mA Lipo, I easily get 45 min of flight! I am so impressed, I am motivated to build one of your pusher seen here in this video.
@allansmits96217 ай бұрын
That's awesome man, please send photo's or videos if you have them to my IG (aerostuff.fpv) I'd love to see it
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
Please post it on your channel if possible
@ghostraptor20686 ай бұрын
@@ghostraptor2068 I only have pics right now.
@allansmits96216 ай бұрын
enjoying your videos
@westbourne19564 ай бұрын
Really fantastic designs, Nathan! Amazing airplanes indeed! 😃 Looking forward to your next creations!!! Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
@MCsCreations7 ай бұрын
Many thanks !
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
When I was growing up there was an RC plane race between two towns about 260km apart. Using a 60-nitro engine with 2 fuel tanks gave an average speed of about 160km/h and a range of about 100km some of the planes had a max speed of well over 200km/h but there was no FPV in those days it was goggles on the back of a pickup. The planes were made of balsa wood and film with fiberglass reinforcement in places.
@julesc80546 ай бұрын
Crazy stuff I would have loved to witness that.
@s__s_62422 ай бұрын
Your hangar is filling up with some impressive aircraft.
@michaelwhinnery1647 ай бұрын
nice black white and yellow color scheme
@choppergirl6 ай бұрын
Great build! It's well tested now that wingtip vertical stabilizers are much more efficient if you can round them from the wing and have them at lesser angles than 90 degrees. I know it'd be significantly harder to make though.
@gregoryvangaya89716 ай бұрын
Nice! Good job.
@Galildoughty5 ай бұрын
Hi, very nice project, if I can advice you something, please close gap between flaps and fuselage on both wing sides. Such gap create "induced drag" because it vent air from below wing section (higher air pressure) to upper wing section (lower air pressure) so reduce wing efficiency. I also suggest to improve surface quality of the wings and fuselage, this will also reduce drag which should increase aerodynamic efficiency and help you with new record.
@pewel1007 ай бұрын
I still haven't made a proper video on my plane, which is a twin boom A-tail pusher, but it gives me 80-90 mah/km with 4s1p 21700 battery. Wingspan is 1.55m and weight is a bit over a kilo. The main difference from your builds, I'd say, is that I've bent depron into an airfoil with an S-shaped bottom surface (a-la e216). Don't judge its stability on my video too much, it was very windy during that flight :)
@Zoey_the_Rat7 ай бұрын
Nice work What is the internal angel for your v tail stabilizers?
@gyamfiic78386 ай бұрын
I love pusher planes so much
@awesomecronk71836 ай бұрын
Love it!
@coreyperez136 ай бұрын
Great project. Thanks for sharing
@xptodundee7 ай бұрын
Thank you😎 Cheers!
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
Interesting plane, like it simple design and efficiency
@stanislavmalyshev52096 ай бұрын
Great work. Thanks for sharing.
@trich3017 ай бұрын
Thanks !
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
I look forward to seeing a toroidal propeller design tested, I wonder if it'll increase efficiency and reduce noise noticeably if you do it!
@albedoblack25686 ай бұрын
very cool!
@jakubzabocki61827 ай бұрын
Do you add the wingtips to help eliminate vortices and improve efficiency? Have you considered a greater angle like a passenger plane?
@thirty_character_limit7 ай бұрын
The best of the best ❤❤
@Gaza_myland7 ай бұрын
beautiful birds
@phearz0r4 ай бұрын
Superb !!!
@ioannisbatas16147 ай бұрын
Pusher props tend to be noisier than a tractor prop is due to the "dirty air" off the tail. Like the engineering and construction detail. Flying out so far while being able to maintain the link is pretty challenging. Nice work all around.
@donuthole72366 ай бұрын
Where do you place your battery for the C.G balancing
@IsahTech7 ай бұрын
Nice design I wonder whether instead of using duct tape, maybe try encapsulation film? It's used for identity cards etc. It's very light, a lot cheaper than covering film, and can be easily ironed on, adds a lot of strength too.
@planespeaking6 ай бұрын
Love you bro.
@kennyking96677 ай бұрын
Can you please do a full build video? building it and installing the electronics? i watched your other videos but they're not complete and seem to jump around a lot
@DG-sk7wt6 ай бұрын
I love V-Tails. Wanna improve the structure design as well?
@dynamixsystems7 ай бұрын
i like following this series, im hopeful that an autonomous delivery of 100 km might be possible someday
@pursuehappiness35437 ай бұрын
Depending on the payload, that is comparable to SRBM range.
@JinKee7 ай бұрын
Working on a 3d model similar to this. I'm thinking a foam bottom with light weight PLA for the rest.
@mannythehunter7 ай бұрын
Hi Like your builds . Can you make a video with complete electronics and software configuration
@kjsj23047 ай бұрын
Next step - better integration of the antennae to the plane. i.e. having an antenna INSIDE the tip of a v-tail and INSIDE the tip of a wng for a cleaner, more aerodynamic exterior. The foam is NOT to provide any RF interference. Sde note - You are not transmitting into space. Point the video TX antenna downwards towards you, the receiver instead of having the RF go through the battery, electronics etc inside the fuselage. Only point the GPS antenna to space.
@toolbaggers7 ай бұрын
The problem would be the risk of damaging the antenna during landing.
@TomasLomba6 ай бұрын
Canards will be less drag at lower speeds if sized just right. They're a lifting surface where a stabilizer / v-tail is a counter-lift to counteract the lift of the wing. Or... Just vacuum bag a hotliner/F3/F5 style wing. They're fast, low drag & effecient, but the high aspect ratios leave them very prone to tip/snap stalls.
@Toysrme6 ай бұрын
looking forward to the "beyond insanity km" Video.
@andiprogshop30976 ай бұрын
Good stuff!
@dronepilot260rc7 ай бұрын
Thanks !
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
Just a thought, solar on the available spaces? No clue if the extra solar charge electronics would make it worth the extra weight though.
@gameswithatwist34556 ай бұрын
video popped up in my recommended feed sparked a few ideas and now i'm wondering whatever happened with the FCC regulating drones and such and how much a pain it would be to build one of these while keeping it legal so I could actually enjoy flying it
@alagor1246 ай бұрын
cool
@naeemulhoque17776 ай бұрын
I wish you could supply these designs in kit form for us les skilled flyers. Thanks.
@TG-lp9vi6 ай бұрын
Excellent video and explanation. You probably already thought of this but in the pursuit for maximum efficiency I would start doing surface work (aka improving aerodynamics) mainly in the fuselage. The rectangular section combined with the triangular nose creates fluid separation which results in significant turbulence. That both creates drag and feeds the prop turbulent air resulting in loss of prop efficiency. Also, testing winglets vs elliptical wings would prove an interesting concept if you have the time for it. The challenge here would be to figure out a good way to make a clean cut on the wing material.
@TomasLomba6 ай бұрын
Thanks very much! I've thought about methods with making the fuselage more aerodynamic (round) without sacrificing it's current durability & strength. I still haven't found a proper way but I'm on it for sure. The wing shapes are being thought on as well, probably implementing a taper-ratio (smaller tip-chord than root-chord) but with wing-sweep to get the leading edge's straight.
@AeroStuffFPV6 ай бұрын
@@AeroStuffFPV Good to hear man. I would love to try it myself but getting these materials has become hard and expensive in my country due to restricted imports so I’m eager to hear out what the outcome was. Keep me posted!
@TomasLomba6 ай бұрын
Oh, almost forgot. Structurally speaking, an O section is as structurally sound as a rectangular section as long as the section area is the same in these low force applications. The challenge being manufacturing/conforming said section with these brittle materials.
@TomasLomba6 ай бұрын
Do you have any 3d models of this that you would consider sharing? It would be fun to do some MFD and also maybe make a 3d printed version. Not because it's better but because I'm lazy and have a good printer.
@forrestallison18796 ай бұрын
Love your aircraft and efforts on this channel. If you wanted to increase rough air stability (without increasing mass or power), how would you aerodynamically modify a v-tail design?
@michaelwhite5197 ай бұрын
Either make it "inverted V", which is very impractical with a traditional fuselage but works very well with a twin boom design. Or use a traditional tail, which doesn't have the inherent adverse yaw of the V-tail. The inverted V is the best of the three.
@mike_oe6 ай бұрын
that antena sticking up looks very draggy. could it be on the nose pointing forward or on the bottom of the nose with no extension stick?
@cementeagle35967 ай бұрын
Can you clarify the v-tail chord lengths for the silver eagle? This video says the tip is 4" and the root is 6.5", but in the original build video it says 4.5" and 6" respectively. I think the original build video is wrong but just wanted to check
@Alex_Crosby7 ай бұрын
Have you thought of a ducted prop? A prop also has wingtip vortices...
@SJP15046 ай бұрын
is this north bay, ca?
@SpicerDavid6 ай бұрын
How much do you need to scale the design if you would like to add a weight simmilar in shape and mass as a RPG warhead?
You should an aircraft from Titan Dynamics, they are 3d printed and very efficient.
@amoswolfe71227 ай бұрын
can you offer a parts list im looking to do a diy plane that can loiter for a while
@johnnybio14 ай бұрын
How much is the prop damaged by landing?
@mudzbe84146 ай бұрын
Your planes is amazing! i have a question, can you tell us how long is your spar wing? (diameter and long) thank's a lot!
@MarcoScianti876 ай бұрын
Thanks man! Carbon 8x750mm on the Peace Hawk & 10x10x1000mm alunimium hollow tube on the Silver Eagle
@AeroStuffFPV6 ай бұрын
do you have any for sale ? thx
@ajj26326 ай бұрын
Would definitely use the new Samsung 50S over the outdated Samsung 48G or 48X, its much higher discharge rate and much lower internal resistance will provide for a much bigger difference in capacity than what you would assume from the 200mah difference in capacity. Something like a Vapcell F60 21700 with 6000mah or Vapcell F56 with 5600mah would also be better options for a pure energy cell but you would have to discharge them at 1C or less to get any real benefit out of them (these cells also should be discharged fairly low to get much benefit out of them, as they unlike most cells still have a lot of capacity between 3 and 2.5 volts).
@swecreations7 ай бұрын
long range configurations aren't current demanding so there is no point in sacrificing capacity, no matter how small that sacrifice is.
@TomasLomba6 ай бұрын
😍😍👍
@marcterryjadal65207 ай бұрын
A lot of similarities between your peace hawk and the MQ9 block 5. The reaper gets ridiculous flight times of greater than 24 hours. At the end of the day, all these UAV platforms are striving to build a glider with an engine. Would look into gliders and at similar platforms for ways to get even better performance. As an Aero Eng, my de facto answer is extend the wings a bit more and also look into the concept of elliptical wings to increase efficiency. Gets better lift and less drag, both will greatly enhance your range.
@redhelmet86 ай бұрын
Thanks for the input! I'm studying the same as well and I'm learning along the way.
@AeroStuffFPV6 ай бұрын
Do you have any suggestions for reading material on better understanding aerodynamics?
@DaveSmith-cp5kj5 ай бұрын
how much payload it can carry?
@GoofyCatGoofer6 ай бұрын
Красивый самолет! 💯
@RicoJovanni7 ай бұрын
Thank you😎 Cheers!
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
So Fasinating To your designs will be more helpful if you could guide me how to design our own planes too😀
@LearnIT-iv2we3 ай бұрын
As you wished, check my latest video!
@AeroStuffFPV3 ай бұрын
Greetings. @3:56 curious of that model. Was making a tractor setup instead of a pusher as I have several pushers, wanted to go back to a smaller noise footprint and less broken engine mounts. Was there any adverse effects of the wingtip mounting camera ? obviously not centerline with FPV however what about adverse yaw ? or disorientation when flying ? Thanks again for the uploads
@alcmann7 ай бұрын
That's my 1st ever V-Tail-Tractor design with Auto Pilot (check my 1st (oldest) video on the channel) kzhead.info/sun/i7KzipiFrJ6Mdo0/bejne.html The disadvantage is not being able to pan or tilt the camera (the 3rd version of the tractor design had a tilt-servo built in as well for looking up/down: kzhead.info/sun/Z8ejY92IpKKiZ3k/bejne.html (go towards the end to observe) However, it depends how you use the aircraft for FPV. I used it to have a look over the neighborhood and fly out a little further (1.5-2.5km) So I didn't worry as much about the offset of my view of the aircraft. The latest design (Silver Guardian) which is a conventional tail has the FPV camera beneath the tail and looks a vew degrees down which was my ultimate sollution for a single-engine tractor platform
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
Samsung 50S 21700 is the best cell combining endurance with performance In one package. Because you are making a small battery pack, the price difference is very small but the increase on durability and performance is much, much better.
@TheMegaTheseus7 ай бұрын
please make for WS 1-1.4 meters of wingspan please
@captaindronieversefpv7 ай бұрын
DIY!
@EarthtoneEmar6 ай бұрын
Have you done any tests to check if those monstrous winglets actually help anything?
@iforce2d7 ай бұрын
Even though there is little to no moment-arm for YAW stability (which was the actual reason for the huge winglets - I never did proper testing if they'd actually make my planes more efficient) I eventually disgarded the idea and went for flat/curved wingtips for efficiency instead. Now, the V-Tails aren't any less stable (as expected) - and are probably more efficient than before.
@AeroStuffFPV6 ай бұрын
What airfoil did you use? I’m working on designing my first drone now in cad, and went with a Clark Y air foil.
@VozValden7 ай бұрын
The airfoils are created by folding strips over the foamboard plates (Armin Wing Airfoil) - Good luck on your build!
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
Long range mission are fun, what about long range delivery of some kind light payload?
@dominiq43437 ай бұрын
Not into that topic, but can be considered by others to modify their fuselage and create a servo-release mechanism to drop
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
So, does you solid fuselage aircraft work better than a twin boom aircraft?
@asabradford-sturguess80286 ай бұрын
They perform about the same, but the V-Tails are slightly better in every aspect (efficiency, stability, climb etc)
@AeroStuffFPV6 ай бұрын
сколько взрывчатки он может везти на борту?
@whoaboutofcup6 ай бұрын
Hi, I'm from remote part of Sri Lanka . I have done similar 1m ( completed ) and 2m ( still in building phase ) wingspan RC planes . I have only 1m Fuselage and every other part done as above specs you. I have 22kV motor 4800mAh 3S batteries . Do you think 1m Wing (100g ) will work with these ? 2m wing will be around 900grams . Whats your recommendations ? Can i talk to you via web ? Due to bad weather test flights not done for a week and cant seems to be good for next few days either .
@baw68555 күн бұрын
Almost looks like a Fouga Magister CM170
@FougaFrancois6 ай бұрын
interested in learning from you
@tholmes84747 ай бұрын
You might consider ditching the rubber band wing retention. You've wrung so much efficiency out of every other aspect of the design
@michaelharris6796 ай бұрын
Like
@myvideointube7 ай бұрын
How much weight can the silver eagle take?
@user-fi7th7db4i7 ай бұрын
Unofficially being 2.5kg AUW is the limit with current 4S setup
@AeroStuffFPV7 ай бұрын
A Ducted Fan / Turbine that pulls Air thru the front of the plane and sends it out of the back would protect the propellers from hitting the ground while giving a cool design but i'm a noob and that might be a lame idea... Just saying hehehe
@monneratrj6 ай бұрын
What if the transmitter was underneath ?
@maxgood427 ай бұрын
Thats good question
@dominiq43437 ай бұрын
@@dominiq4343 I think it could be stream lined better then and project downward to the FPV and have a small bit of alloy sheet go act as a barrier leaving the GPS to receive signals from above . Maybe ?
@maxgood427 ай бұрын
Make new long range UAV
@URBANKILLER.X7 ай бұрын
Which motor consumes less power?
@joelledvina47516 ай бұрын
600kv is more efficient
@AeroStuffFPV6 ай бұрын
43.95cm
@Chris-Brown-6 ай бұрын
Are you selling these and what cost
@RA-II6 ай бұрын
Not selling them (yet?)
@AeroStuffFPV6 ай бұрын
the main difference between what you do and what ukrainian drone-builders do is that you are not trying to carry explosives. and that changes a lot in terms of range and payload and plain structure.
@dmitriykozmin30917 ай бұрын
You know people are flying 100km out and back with foam mini talons running 4S7P Li-Ion?
@MohammadAdib6 ай бұрын
Well aware of that😎
@AeroStuffFPV6 ай бұрын
A great idea would be to make a GPS kamikaze drone
A youtuber made an RCPLANE that still flying for 7h !!! I dont remember the Chanel but it very crazy but your plane is crazy to continue like that :D
Search in your history
Rctestflight? I know he made a delta wing which was covered in solar panels which only started using the battery after it got dark.
He isn't a youtuber who happens to make an RC airplane. He is an engineer who happens to make youtube videos.
@@atrumluminariumrctestflight did this. Only a German university group did more, with a 72 hour flight (atlantik solar I think?)
@@pauljones9150 Oh, I haven't seen that. I'll check it out :)
Earned yourself a sub. One of the coolest long range FPV channels.
Amazing performance. So efficient with that foam board wing - excellent craftsmanship
Man am i glad i found your channel. One love, man.
Drag reduction alone will not get increased range, if the wing can produce less lift. Because the ability to carry a large battery is also a factor in the range. Distance optimization is the goal. commercial airliners and bombers tend to go on the speed side of the distance optimization for a variety of reasons, including because they may be shot at, the customers are impatient, the aircraft may be needed elsewhere, or there may be headwinds to penetrate. The only exception is if runway requirements cannot be met, then a slower aircraft is used. think dehaviland twin otter or DHC-2. Personally as a design choice, I would move to a slightly thicker wing, and you would be surprised how much more weight in battery it can carry. most RC planes only can carry half or less of the battery that they can after a wing mod. you may be able to extend the wings too. that gets more wing area, but also a better aspect ratio. any weight that you increase in spar size will be more than made up for, in increased efficiency. keep using a single carbon tube spar. find a way to glue a rib to it every now and then, so that you can take advantage of the ability of the carbon tube to resist torsion, and then you can make the structure lighter on the skin, because that no longer has to resist torsion. then you get the weight Back that way, that you spent on the longer wing. the aerodynamic noise that you refer to in gliding flight, is not a good thing. One method of reducing drag of a design in a wind tunnel is to move a microphone around the plane while the wind tunnel is moving air at speed over the surfaces, and locate elevated acoustic areas. That can identify inefficiencies, and verify that they have been improved. the increased distance between the prop and any surfaces in front of it is very good. again, the acoustics prove it like you say. in theory, the increased motor stator diameter will result in increased efficiency. So since you have a pusher, might as well use a motor with a diameter as large as the fuselage. the closer you can get to that, the better. try going up in pitch, to a 12 x 8 prop, or so. or even 12 x 10. you should notice a difference in efficiency. even in slow flight, the reduction in motor RPM is very advantageous for achieving same thrust with less blade tip drag penalty. So, when you switch to LI ION, please check and make sure your ESC's can continue to operate normally down to a very low voltage. I'm using Castle ESC's and using the Castle Link USB/ adaptor and their software, it's very easy to set low voltage cut off to 5V. You can go down to 2.5V per cell on the Li Ion, but beware of the power you lose when gong below 3V per cell, as the airplane may be able to say aloft, but probably cannot safely perform a go-around at those low voltages, so make sure you have a good landing site ready. most ESC's can only be brought down to 2.85V or so, if they are programable for low Volt cut off. and make sure you don't experience a soft cutoff it ground testing and think the battery is just getting low, or not notice at all. a soft cutoff will bring down the plane just the same as a hard cutoff. well, those are my two bits of advice. your planes look great! Nice flying!
Servos in front of the tail are not covered with any aerodynamic surfaces, it creates turbulence which is not good
Thanks very much. I’m learning a lot! The aluminum (1m) spar is the only option I currently have to support the XPS wing. But once a 10x750mm or 10x1000mm carbon tube is in stock, It’ll replace the aluminum spar. I’ve flown Li-Ions before but have to get used to their way of dropping down in voltage because their nature is to drop under ‘relatively’ low current. iNAV has a parameter that calculates the sag-compensated voltage, which I’ll use, along with actual battery voltage.
80cc
Sailplanes. They are now getting over 60 to 1. The size of the engine is then dramatically reduced.
Sailplanes do not have to carry large batteries or large amounts of fuel.Having to do so changes the optimization. @@adenwellsmith6908
Sticking to a single design and improving it, its much better than hopping between designs and hoping to find a better platform. Honestly I'm getting similar range and flight time on a wing based design, but nothing inline with the price point of your foam build design. So with lots more $$ invested getting further and longer flights isn't always a reality. Well done, and thank you for sharing your experience, building technics, and performance of the models
man another super interesting video. Thanks for taking the time to so clearly show everything you were explaining.
Great comparison and overview with clear explanations. Great flight video too.
Thanks for the information and demonstration, I look forward to using a similar design with lethal ordinance to do some stuff to some people.
Well done Sir,all work done by yourself is indeed a great effort,thankyou for posting
nice, always like the VTail & pusher Planes 🖖
Always a great video. Thanks
I always love your video ❤, Thanks for Sharing
I love this type of content although I guess you realized along the way you've reinvented the famous reaper drone design 😊
beautiful work man
I built your Silver Guardian, and it flies like a dream, with a SpeedyBee F405 Wing FC and Arduplane! If anyone doubts how well these planes fly, I can testify how good they are. I have not done a distance test yet, but flying with a basic 3300 mA Lipo, I easily get 45 min of flight! I am so impressed, I am motivated to build one of your pusher seen here in this video.
That's awesome man, please send photo's or videos if you have them to my IG (aerostuff.fpv) I'd love to see it
Please post it on your channel if possible
@@ghostraptor2068 I only have pics right now.
enjoying your videos
Really fantastic designs, Nathan! Amazing airplanes indeed! 😃 Looking forward to your next creations!!! Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Many thanks !
When I was growing up there was an RC plane race between two towns about 260km apart. Using a 60-nitro engine with 2 fuel tanks gave an average speed of about 160km/h and a range of about 100km some of the planes had a max speed of well over 200km/h but there was no FPV in those days it was goggles on the back of a pickup. The planes were made of balsa wood and film with fiberglass reinforcement in places.
Crazy stuff I would have loved to witness that.
Your hangar is filling up with some impressive aircraft.
nice black white and yellow color scheme
Great build! It's well tested now that wingtip vertical stabilizers are much more efficient if you can round them from the wing and have them at lesser angles than 90 degrees. I know it'd be significantly harder to make though.
Nice! Good job.
Hi, very nice project, if I can advice you something, please close gap between flaps and fuselage on both wing sides. Such gap create "induced drag" because it vent air from below wing section (higher air pressure) to upper wing section (lower air pressure) so reduce wing efficiency. I also suggest to improve surface quality of the wings and fuselage, this will also reduce drag which should increase aerodynamic efficiency and help you with new record.
I still haven't made a proper video on my plane, which is a twin boom A-tail pusher, but it gives me 80-90 mah/km with 4s1p 21700 battery. Wingspan is 1.55m and weight is a bit over a kilo. The main difference from your builds, I'd say, is that I've bent depron into an airfoil with an S-shaped bottom surface (a-la e216). Don't judge its stability on my video too much, it was very windy during that flight :)
Nice work What is the internal angel for your v tail stabilizers?
I love pusher planes so much
Love it!
Great project. Thanks for sharing
Thank you😎 Cheers!
Interesting plane, like it simple design and efficiency
Great work. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks !
I look forward to seeing a toroidal propeller design tested, I wonder if it'll increase efficiency and reduce noise noticeably if you do it!
very cool!
Do you add the wingtips to help eliminate vortices and improve efficiency? Have you considered a greater angle like a passenger plane?
The best of the best ❤❤
beautiful birds
Superb !!!
Pusher props tend to be noisier than a tractor prop is due to the "dirty air" off the tail. Like the engineering and construction detail. Flying out so far while being able to maintain the link is pretty challenging. Nice work all around.
Where do you place your battery for the C.G balancing
Nice design I wonder whether instead of using duct tape, maybe try encapsulation film? It's used for identity cards etc. It's very light, a lot cheaper than covering film, and can be easily ironed on, adds a lot of strength too.
Love you bro.
Can you please do a full build video? building it and installing the electronics? i watched your other videos but they're not complete and seem to jump around a lot
I love V-Tails. Wanna improve the structure design as well?
i like following this series, im hopeful that an autonomous delivery of 100 km might be possible someday
Depending on the payload, that is comparable to SRBM range.
Working on a 3d model similar to this. I'm thinking a foam bottom with light weight PLA for the rest.
Hi Like your builds . Can you make a video with complete electronics and software configuration
Next step - better integration of the antennae to the plane. i.e. having an antenna INSIDE the tip of a v-tail and INSIDE the tip of a wng for a cleaner, more aerodynamic exterior. The foam is NOT to provide any RF interference. Sde note - You are not transmitting into space. Point the video TX antenna downwards towards you, the receiver instead of having the RF go through the battery, electronics etc inside the fuselage. Only point the GPS antenna to space.
The problem would be the risk of damaging the antenna during landing.
Canards will be less drag at lower speeds if sized just right. They're a lifting surface where a stabilizer / v-tail is a counter-lift to counteract the lift of the wing. Or... Just vacuum bag a hotliner/F3/F5 style wing. They're fast, low drag & effecient, but the high aspect ratios leave them very prone to tip/snap stalls.
looking forward to the "beyond insanity km" Video.
Good stuff!
Thanks !
Just a thought, solar on the available spaces? No clue if the extra solar charge electronics would make it worth the extra weight though.
video popped up in my recommended feed sparked a few ideas and now i'm wondering whatever happened with the FCC regulating drones and such and how much a pain it would be to build one of these while keeping it legal so I could actually enjoy flying it
cool
I wish you could supply these designs in kit form for us les skilled flyers. Thanks.
Excellent video and explanation. You probably already thought of this but in the pursuit for maximum efficiency I would start doing surface work (aka improving aerodynamics) mainly in the fuselage. The rectangular section combined with the triangular nose creates fluid separation which results in significant turbulence. That both creates drag and feeds the prop turbulent air resulting in loss of prop efficiency. Also, testing winglets vs elliptical wings would prove an interesting concept if you have the time for it. The challenge here would be to figure out a good way to make a clean cut on the wing material.
Thanks very much! I've thought about methods with making the fuselage more aerodynamic (round) without sacrificing it's current durability & strength. I still haven't found a proper way but I'm on it for sure. The wing shapes are being thought on as well, probably implementing a taper-ratio (smaller tip-chord than root-chord) but with wing-sweep to get the leading edge's straight.
@@AeroStuffFPV Good to hear man. I would love to try it myself but getting these materials has become hard and expensive in my country due to restricted imports so I’m eager to hear out what the outcome was. Keep me posted!
Oh, almost forgot. Structurally speaking, an O section is as structurally sound as a rectangular section as long as the section area is the same in these low force applications. The challenge being manufacturing/conforming said section with these brittle materials.
Do you have any 3d models of this that you would consider sharing? It would be fun to do some MFD and also maybe make a 3d printed version. Not because it's better but because I'm lazy and have a good printer.
Love your aircraft and efforts on this channel. If you wanted to increase rough air stability (without increasing mass or power), how would you aerodynamically modify a v-tail design?
Either make it "inverted V", which is very impractical with a traditional fuselage but works very well with a twin boom design. Or use a traditional tail, which doesn't have the inherent adverse yaw of the V-tail. The inverted V is the best of the three.
that antena sticking up looks very draggy. could it be on the nose pointing forward or on the bottom of the nose with no extension stick?
Can you clarify the v-tail chord lengths for the silver eagle? This video says the tip is 4" and the root is 6.5", but in the original build video it says 4.5" and 6" respectively. I think the original build video is wrong but just wanted to check
Have you thought of a ducted prop? A prop also has wingtip vortices...
is this north bay, ca?
How much do you need to scale the design if you would like to add a weight simmilar in shape and mass as a RPG warhead?
How much would a build like this cost?
KFM flat bottom airfoil, possibly lighter and better flying? Laurie NZ. 😊
You should an aircraft from Titan Dynamics, they are 3d printed and very efficient.
can you offer a parts list im looking to do a diy plane that can loiter for a while
How much is the prop damaged by landing?
Your planes is amazing! i have a question, can you tell us how long is your spar wing? (diameter and long) thank's a lot!
Thanks man! Carbon 8x750mm on the Peace Hawk & 10x10x1000mm alunimium hollow tube on the Silver Eagle
do you have any for sale ? thx
Would definitely use the new Samsung 50S over the outdated Samsung 48G or 48X, its much higher discharge rate and much lower internal resistance will provide for a much bigger difference in capacity than what you would assume from the 200mah difference in capacity. Something like a Vapcell F60 21700 with 6000mah or Vapcell F56 with 5600mah would also be better options for a pure energy cell but you would have to discharge them at 1C or less to get any real benefit out of them (these cells also should be discharged fairly low to get much benefit out of them, as they unlike most cells still have a lot of capacity between 3 and 2.5 volts).
long range configurations aren't current demanding so there is no point in sacrificing capacity, no matter how small that sacrifice is.
😍😍👍
A lot of similarities between your peace hawk and the MQ9 block 5. The reaper gets ridiculous flight times of greater than 24 hours. At the end of the day, all these UAV platforms are striving to build a glider with an engine. Would look into gliders and at similar platforms for ways to get even better performance. As an Aero Eng, my de facto answer is extend the wings a bit more and also look into the concept of elliptical wings to increase efficiency. Gets better lift and less drag, both will greatly enhance your range.
Thanks for the input! I'm studying the same as well and I'm learning along the way.
Do you have any suggestions for reading material on better understanding aerodynamics?
how much payload it can carry?
Красивый самолет! 💯
Thank you😎 Cheers!
So Fasinating To your designs will be more helpful if you could guide me how to design our own planes too😀
As you wished, check my latest video!
Greetings. @3:56 curious of that model. Was making a tractor setup instead of a pusher as I have several pushers, wanted to go back to a smaller noise footprint and less broken engine mounts. Was there any adverse effects of the wingtip mounting camera ? obviously not centerline with FPV however what about adverse yaw ? or disorientation when flying ? Thanks again for the uploads
That's my 1st ever V-Tail-Tractor design with Auto Pilot (check my 1st (oldest) video on the channel) kzhead.info/sun/i7KzipiFrJ6Mdo0/bejne.html The disadvantage is not being able to pan or tilt the camera (the 3rd version of the tractor design had a tilt-servo built in as well for looking up/down: kzhead.info/sun/Z8ejY92IpKKiZ3k/bejne.html (go towards the end to observe) However, it depends how you use the aircraft for FPV. I used it to have a look over the neighborhood and fly out a little further (1.5-2.5km) So I didn't worry as much about the offset of my view of the aircraft. The latest design (Silver Guardian) which is a conventional tail has the FPV camera beneath the tail and looks a vew degrees down which was my ultimate sollution for a single-engine tractor platform
Samsung 50S 21700 is the best cell combining endurance with performance In one package. Because you are making a small battery pack, the price difference is very small but the increase on durability and performance is much, much better.
please make for WS 1-1.4 meters of wingspan please
DIY!
Have you done any tests to check if those monstrous winglets actually help anything?
Even though there is little to no moment-arm for YAW stability (which was the actual reason for the huge winglets - I never did proper testing if they'd actually make my planes more efficient) I eventually disgarded the idea and went for flat/curved wingtips for efficiency instead. Now, the V-Tails aren't any less stable (as expected) - and are probably more efficient than before.
What airfoil did you use? I’m working on designing my first drone now in cad, and went with a Clark Y air foil.
The airfoils are created by folding strips over the foamboard plates (Armin Wing Airfoil) - Good luck on your build!
Long range mission are fun, what about long range delivery of some kind light payload?
Not into that topic, but can be considered by others to modify their fuselage and create a servo-release mechanism to drop
So, does you solid fuselage aircraft work better than a twin boom aircraft?
They perform about the same, but the V-Tails are slightly better in every aspect (efficiency, stability, climb etc)
сколько взрывчатки он может везти на борту?
Hi, I'm from remote part of Sri Lanka . I have done similar 1m ( completed ) and 2m ( still in building phase ) wingspan RC planes . I have only 1m Fuselage and every other part done as above specs you. I have 22kV motor 4800mAh 3S batteries . Do you think 1m Wing (100g ) will work with these ? 2m wing will be around 900grams . Whats your recommendations ? Can i talk to you via web ? Due to bad weather test flights not done for a week and cant seems to be good for next few days either .
Almost looks like a Fouga Magister CM170
interested in learning from you
You might consider ditching the rubber band wing retention. You've wrung so much efficiency out of every other aspect of the design
Like
How much weight can the silver eagle take?
Unofficially being 2.5kg AUW is the limit with current 4S setup
A Ducted Fan / Turbine that pulls Air thru the front of the plane and sends it out of the back would protect the propellers from hitting the ground while giving a cool design but i'm a noob and that might be a lame idea... Just saying hehehe
What if the transmitter was underneath ?
Thats good question
@@dominiq4343 I think it could be stream lined better then and project downward to the FPV and have a small bit of alloy sheet go act as a barrier leaving the GPS to receive signals from above . Maybe ?
Make new long range UAV
Which motor consumes less power?
600kv is more efficient
43.95cm
Are you selling these and what cost
Not selling them (yet?)
the main difference between what you do and what ukrainian drone-builders do is that you are not trying to carry explosives. and that changes a lot in terms of range and payload and plain structure.
You know people are flying 100km out and back with foam mini talons running 4S7P Li-Ion?
Well aware of that😎
A great idea would be to make a GPS kamikaze drone
Is the audio an AI?