The Fall of Attila the Hun: The Battle of Catalaunian Plains | 451 AD | DOCUMENTARY

2024 ж. 23 Мам.
1 284 300 Рет қаралды

Check out our partner for epic historical jewelry and other accessories here: spqrshop.com/ref/Aditu-Laudis/
In 451 AD, two of the most powerful empires of the time, the Roman Empire and the Huns, faced off in one of the most significant battles in history: The Battle of Catalaunian Plains. This battle marked the beginning of the fall of Attila the Hun, one of history's most fearsome and ruthless conquerors.
The Western Roman Empire faced a formidable foe in the form of Attila the Hun, one of the most feared and brutal conquerors in history. Attila had already ravaged much of Europe with his unstoppable horde of warriors, leaving a trail of destruction in his wake. The Roman Empire, which had once been a dominant force, was struggling to maintain its grip on its territories, weakened by political instability and internal divisions.
The Battle of Catalaunian Plains was the result of a series of events that led to a clash between two of the most powerful empires of the time. Attila had invaded the Roman province of Gaul and was threatening to advance further into the heart of the empire. The Roman general Flavius Aetius knew that he had to stop Attila before he could do any more damage, and he rallied his troops for battle.
The two armies met on the plains of Gaul, near the modern-day city of Châlons-en-Champagne, in what would become one of the bloodiest battles in history. The fighting was intense, with both sides suffering heavy losses. The Roman army was made up of a diverse group of soldiers, including Visigoths, Alans, Franks, Burgundians and Saxons, who fought alongside the Roman legions. The Huns, on the other hand, were a homogeneous force, united by their loyalty to Attila.
Despite the odds against them, the Romans managed to hold their ground and repel the Hunnic forces. The battle was a turning point in the war, and it marked the beginning of the end for Attila and his empire. Although Attila would continue to launch raids and conquests, he was never able to regain the momentum he had before the Battle of Catalaunian Plains.
Our documentary delves into the events leading up to the battle and the tactics used by both sides. We bring this pivotal moment in history to life. Join us on this journey as we explore the fall of Attila the Hun and the Battle of Catalaunian Plains, a conflict that changed the course of European history forever.
Make sure to like and comment letting know your thoughts on this battle. Hit the notification bell as you subscribe to find out when the next video lands.
This video was realized using Attila Total War with the following modifications:
Radious Total War Mod
Double Size Units for Radious
Medieval Warfare - Graphic
#historicalbattle #aditulaudis #battleofcatalaunianplains
Timecodes:
00:00 Introduction
00:45 Huns invading Europe
01:15 Huns arrive in Gaul
02:00 Attila arises
02:32 Attila's casus belli
02:56 Flavius Aetius gathers an army against Attila
03:58 Aetius pursues Attila towards the Catalaunian Plains
05:03 Armies meet on the plains
05:50 Army compositions
07:06 Battle starts with Attila's archer cavalry
09:08 Attila's charge on the Roman coalition army
10:57 Atilla's allies advance on the Roman wings
12:55 Theodoric, Visigothic king dies in battle
13:38 Fight becomes chaotic
15:06 Both sides retreat
16:22 Attila's end

Пікірлер
  • Ave Milites! I am back! Make sure to support the channel by liking and commenting. Get notified by subscribing and pushing the notification bell. You can support the channel by checking our partner spqrshop.com/ref/Aditu-Laudis/ and purchasing something cool for yourself or a friend. See you in the next one!

    @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
    • These were the times where the romans used the phalanx which they learned from the Greeks. Specifically for these types of enemies.

      @MrAnderson5157@MrAnderson5157 Жыл бұрын
    • Attila is often lied to by Western historians because it annoys them that he beat them to shit, especially slapping the Romans in the ass as they fled. But they forget that it was with the disintegration of the Roman Empire that the formation of independent nations began.

      @izidorkohn1908@izidorkohn1908 Жыл бұрын
    • The Huns are still the toughest people in Europe. No one could destroy them. They have their own unique ancient language, some that no one understands, and strangers find it very difficult to learn. Their culture and folk art date back to the Scythians.

      @izidorkohn1908@izidorkohn1908 Жыл бұрын
    • Great editing and feature as per usual 👍 Total War is still the best strategy game out there

      @johneaton25@johneaton25 Жыл бұрын
    • ​​@@izidorkohn1908 But Scythians weren't Turkic people Sure they were mixed with Huns during the 4th or 5th century AD but their origin was Iranian or Indo European It's even mentioned they spoke in Iranian languages

      @ramtin5152@ramtin5152 Жыл бұрын
  • Az Attila-film és brutális szövege különösen, köszönő viszonyban nincs a történelmi tényekkel! Hazugság, szemtelen a javából!

    @petoimre3671@petoimre36717 ай бұрын
    • Mit vár tóle ? Gagyi nyugati maszlag.Nyugatnak halvány fogalma sincs a történelemről csak a hazudozáshoz értenek.

      @gusztavbankuti8272@gusztavbankuti827211 күн бұрын
  • Contrary to common belief Huns didn't just vanish but dissolved as a unified entity with Oghur tribes Utigur, Akatziri, Saragur, Onogur, Barsil, Kutrigur, Bulgar, Sabir, all being fractions

    @nenenindonu@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
    • yes 2010 .......Hun people 810 million ...hun-blood-genetic R1a1-J2

      @gaborbaki6983@gaborbaki6983 Жыл бұрын
    • Yes, but that is the way of most empires that fall.

      @MrGunBunny13@MrGunBunny13 Жыл бұрын
    • بیا سرشو بخور بابا

      @jakmachine9279@jakmachine9279 Жыл бұрын
    • It's also thought by many linguists that some of Atilla's hoard settled in the Pyrenees and evolved into the Basques.

      @davidkinsey8657@davidkinsey8657 Жыл бұрын
    • KOSZONOM....

      @laszlobalogh3717@laszlobalogh371711 ай бұрын
  • Incredible as usual

    @James_Blazer@James_Blazer Жыл бұрын
  • This is my favorite new channel

    @dosierchannel6387@dosierchannel63876 ай бұрын
  • Quality as always

    @uttkarshchauhan7112@uttkarshchauhan7112 Жыл бұрын
  • Very good!!! Well done!!!

    @UprightoneNoble-nu3wx@UprightoneNoble-nu3wx10 ай бұрын
    • Thanks a lot!

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI10 ай бұрын
  • awesome video man

    @denvercolorado811@denvercolorado811 Жыл бұрын
  • great video with details!

    @sergeystepanyan1226@sergeystepanyan1226 Жыл бұрын
    • Thanks Sergey!

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
  • The leaders of the coalition were wrong several times. However, the Huns launched a general attack the very next day, at dawn on the second day of June 451. The main forces attacked from the opposite side, the Eastern Goths from the right and the Gepids from the left. The hesitant and confused coalition troops who woke up with the alarm were so surprised that the fate of the battle was decided in just a few hours. Severus's legions were easily scattered and routed by Theodemir's Gothic hurlers Attila's heavy cavalry, consisting of armored javelins and lancers, and the three solid penetrating wedges of the previously unknown "cataphracts" amazed and surprised the Roman center that the light-armored legions were completely powerless against them. The javelins advanced as far as Vetrónius's fighting position, but Atilla ordered them in a different direction because he did not want to risk the life of Aetius. Ardarik's best Gepid mudguard was tasked with capturing Theodoric and his staff. The bulk of the left wing attacked with great force, but at a measured pace, against the Visigoths, who knew Hun tactics well. However, half a concentrated Gyor team, led by the prince of Bajuvár Alaufin, bypassed the city of Tul with a special fighting style and attacked from the side and broke through the Visigothic order. They calculated well that the attack on the eye would distract the commanders. The order of battle, which did not secure his side well enough, was broken through with a single thrust. Given that they were well acquainted with the fighting style of the Visigoths, they reached the tribal positions almost unmolested. In the Battle of Catalnaum, Atilla defeated the coalition armies, went to Rome, where the Pope offered Atilla the keys to Rome, but Atilla did not accept it, he did not want to destroy the city. They also don't know that Atilla saved the Roman Empire several times. The Roman emperor had a bodyguard of Huns.

    @magdikaolasz9568@magdikaolasz956810 ай бұрын
  • These videos are so cool. Everything you need to see and hear about the battles of the past in stunning visuals and great narration. Some of those shots are the closest things we will prob see to how these battles looked like. Great job I’m looking forward for more!

    @weedwizard7906@weedwizard7906 Жыл бұрын
    • Thanks, more to come soon

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
    • Sorry...cannot understand your pronunciation. Especially the group names. A bit fast.

      @gyawhtetdoe9779@gyawhtetdoe9779 Жыл бұрын
    • If you like living in Fantasyland

      @Lem-cj8ev@Lem-cj8ev Жыл бұрын
    • A-HUNOK-NEM--VESZTETTEK-4555-BEN....

      @laszlobalogh3717@laszlobalogh371711 ай бұрын
    • ETIL-,NEMVESZTETT-....,AETIUS-NEM--"NYERT"..

      @laszlobalogh3717@laszlobalogh371711 ай бұрын
  • Really intriguing. ❤

    @BoundInChains@BoundInChains3 ай бұрын
  • Me gustó mucho, estaré pendiente de ese canal para ver próximaxs batallas. Me gustaria ver las batallas de Napoleón Bonaparte.

    @israellopezalegria640@israellopezalegria64010 ай бұрын
    • Awesome. Welcome to the channel

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI10 ай бұрын
  • I believe there is considerable evidence that Attila’s forces Formed a defensive circle with his baggage train. He was expecting an attack. When it dos not come he retreated. Aetius also withdrew realizing his shaky Visigoth alliance. I see it as a tactical draw but strategic win for Rome. True attlla invaded Italy a year or so latter., knowing he could not attack Gaul again. Italy proved a mistake, it was a soft target,except for the Italian summer and annual disease season. Another strategic loss ensued.

    @johnconnery1939@johnconnery1939 Жыл бұрын
    • "annual disease season" mean but true xD

      @underarmbowlingincidentof1981@underarmbowlingincidentof1981 Жыл бұрын
  • Az a probléma, hogy Catalaunum illetve Mariacum környékén, bár kutatások folytak, nem találják a nyomait sem egy ilyen volumenű ütközetnek. Viszont írásos nyomai vannak az elmúlt századok történelem hamisitasanak.

    @antalsafar4255@antalsafar4255 Жыл бұрын
    • the only falsifications are in your Hungarian history books, Attila was a bluff

      @garlic2006@garlic20063 ай бұрын
    • Yes man! If Atilla was a bluff, you don't even exist s.t.u.p.i.d!@@garlic2006

      @aranykert@aranykert3 ай бұрын
    • ​@@garlic2006- olvasgass még ! Hiányos a tudásod ! ..... :)

      @gyulaerdei3180@gyulaerdei31803 ай бұрын
  • MANNN !!! INCREDD vid !! I feel INTENSE bumps !! 🦾💥 👏👏👏🙏

    @user-ms6bi7xz8i@user-ms6bi7xz8i Жыл бұрын
    • Thanks

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
  • Great history video 📹

    @brianschilling4279@brianschilling42793 ай бұрын
    • Glad you enjoyed it

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI3 ай бұрын
  • Great video my friend! Historical battle that changed the course of human history! Keep up the great work

    @truckingmogul3254@truckingmogul3254 Жыл бұрын
    • Thank you man!

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
    • @@AdituLaudisMMXXI The only probem here is : The huns von this batle because the romans diapeared overnight, therefore the huns did not find the in the early morning. LOOK AFTER THE RIGHT HISTORY. Attila lost the batle = Tis is hapened the other way around.!

      @edithuszka3324@edithuszka33249 ай бұрын
    • @@AdituLaudisMMXXI харош мультики показывать. эту битву народов описали Францисканские монахи наблюдавшие за ней с холма. против 150 нахов во главе с Атиллой из племени гунов. рим выставил 1 миллион солдат. по 300 тыс от рима от галлов и готтов и через 3 дня за счет числености римский генерал Аврелий хотел их окружить зажав к реке Кельн в германии нынешей это. Атилла угадав его план ночью перевел армию через кельн и захватил крепость позади себя осел там а римская армия не решилась пойти вслед за нахами( Аланы Гунны Викинги Англы варяги это все разные названия одного и того же народа с кавказа. Нахов. ведущих свой род от предка Ноха. ( библейского Ноя .Ноаха) Атилла послал за подмогой на родину вестника и через год к нему прибыло еще 250 тыс Нахов. их в европе знают как 1авар- это переводится как пришел пожить. на время. вот там и был воплощен план Барбаросса. 3 удара в разные точки чтоб не дать Риму как раньше обьединиться в миллионную армию как при Колотуанской битве. к тому же пока атилла был в европе на его родину напали Сарматы и нахам пришлось часть войск отсылать на кавказ чтоб обезопасить родину и генералы Курмих и Басих с сыном Атиллы Динцигом через Азовское море вернулись и истребили акациров-сарматов напавших на аланию а потом совершили поход за каспий и там тоже разогнали их логово и после этого про них никто слышал в мире. на самом деле Атилла и Нахи даже не хотели покорять ни рим ни европу они просто преследовали ост-Готов которые вместе со славянами первые напали на аланию перейдя за реки Тина и Итиль на кавказ 600 тыс войском и когда нахи погнали их со своей земли то славяне спрятались выжившие в полуночных землях на севере а ост-готы бежали к западным готам спастись преследуемые гуном Атилой со 150 тыс армией Нахов-Аланов. вот так они и дошли до запада и рим встал на их пути. но после того как рим нанес серьезный урон нахам то они уже решили поквитаться и с Римом. и так и сделали. потом.

      @user-dt7rv3sb9o@user-dt7rv3sb9o3 ай бұрын
  • Excellent Episode 👍 Amazing that the battle site has yet to be discovered 🤔😡

    @josephphoenix1376@josephphoenix1376 Жыл бұрын
    • imagine how many times they cultivated that land in 1500 years!!!

      @aranykert@aranykert3 ай бұрын
  • Great cinematic story telling.

    @FrontlinePros@FrontlinePros Жыл бұрын
    • Thx

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
  • It was so EPIC I enjoyed every minute of it I don't know which battle you're planning to cover next but please consider covering the battle of Anglon 543 It's highly underrated

    @ramtin5152@ramtin5152 Жыл бұрын
  • My understanding from other sources is that the Romans left the field because Aetius still hoped to one day utilize Hunnic forces for Rome. And of course his troops were exhausted along with the question of the Visigoths staying to finish the fight. Attila on his part was said to have built a large pile of saddles and things to burn himself up if the Roman forces attacked his encampment and it fell. At best I believe it could be called a " draw " . A pity Attila wasn't finished then and there . Italy suffered for it with the attacks later on and it further brought about the fall of the Western Empire . I enjoyed this presentation ! Thank you for it.😊

    @michaeldriskell2038@michaeldriskell2038Ай бұрын
  • Enjoyed.👍👍

    @pa5287@pa5287 Жыл бұрын
  • Historically, after remaining a week after the battle both armies in their camps watching each other, Attila's army was the one that initially executed a withdrawal to the Rhine River, in which it was followed at a prudent distance by the Romans and Alans.

    @JorgeRodriguez-rl7tn@JorgeRodriguez-rl7tn Жыл бұрын
    • I think it was more of a stalemate than it is a victory for either side.

      @timothylee2772@timothylee277211 ай бұрын
    • 😆😆😆

      @krisztinamerenyi4136@krisztinamerenyi413610 ай бұрын
    • All Alans was slutered by Attila's troops , they was the first , because they betreadet him ! Attila's had large Alans troops to ! Etc...

      @attilatasciko4817@attilatasciko48177 ай бұрын
  • Nice👍🏻👌🏻. Good Work👍🏻

    @alexandermittelbock6171@alexandermittelbock6171 Жыл бұрын
    • Thank you!

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
  • It's nicely done, thank you bro. 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

    @banglekinh6984@banglekinh698410 ай бұрын
    • Welcome 😊

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI10 ай бұрын
  • the battle weakened the Huns. Attila died two years later and his "empire" was no more within 18 years.

    @janibeg3247@janibeg3247 Жыл бұрын
    • AVARIZTAN empire 490-803 : danmark to kaukazus hill

      @gaborbaki6983@gaborbaki6983 Жыл бұрын
    • @janibeg3247 The Western Romans didn't fare any better...A few years after the Catalaunian battle of 451 CE. Aetius was summoned by Emperor Valentinian III to the Imperial Palace in Ravenna to report on financial matters in 454 CE. When Aetius informed about the state of the treasury, suddenly the emperor rose from the throne and began to accuse Aetius of accusations of acting against him. He accused him of losing his throne rights in the Eastern Empire because of him, and now Aetius sought to take power from him in Ravenna. Then the emperor stood up and hit the Roman commander in the head several times on the head, killing him on the spot. Aetius’ comrades shared his fate. The death of Flavius ​​Aetius, baptized as the “the last of the Romans”, definitely meant no chance of rebuilding the Western Roman Empire and led Rome to the abyss. Procopius reports that the emperor, after killing Aetius, was to ask a certain Roman whether he had made the right decision by removing Aetius; he would answer: “Good or bad, I don’t know that, but I know you have cut off your right hand with your left.” The western empire suffered several Gothic invasions and, in AD 455, was sacked by Vandals. Rome continued to decline after that until AD 476 when the western Roman Empire came to an end.

      @DarkKhagan@DarkKhagan11 ай бұрын
    • And what about the Hungarian Kingdom which was a heir of Attila? It survived for centuries on while the Roman Empire collapsed in 476???

      @dr.d.j.laszlo@dr.d.j.laszlo3 ай бұрын
  • It's a strategic stalemate and tactical victory for Attila since the year after the Romans were left with no man power and had to watch the Huns razing their way into Rome until paying them off

    @nenenindonu@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
    • Desicive Hun victory.

      @scourgeofgodattila579@scourgeofgodattila579 Жыл бұрын
    • The Romans already lacked man power way before the invasion of the Huns. Like the video says, they rely on mercenaries.

      @patung1990@patung1990 Жыл бұрын
    • Atila nem szenvedett vereséget félre vezető a cím, inkább pont hogy a Rómaiak szenvedtek vereséget hisz elvesztették hadvezérüket , és mikkor Őseink ott voltak a Római légiók elkotrodtak szép csendben .Ráadásul a gyalogosok hátrányban vannak a lovas íjászokkal szemben .

      @belasaska4269@belasaska4269 Жыл бұрын
    • Hun army 700 000 rider ..mandzsuria to -hindiztan-kaukazus hill-europe ..5 hun empire ....europe hun 150 000 rider

      @gaborbaki6983@gaborbaki6983 Жыл бұрын
    • Both sides had paid Allies

      @johnconnery1939@johnconnery1939 Жыл бұрын
  • Please explain to me how did the Huns led by Attila reach the gates of Rome the following year, if they were "defeated" in Gaul?? Rome was defenceless, the pope begged Atiila not to destroy the city and what a miracle: Attila listened to the old man and left, w/o any pillaging. The pope was so thankful that called him the "scourge of God". Tell me which is the tactic when I defeat the enemy far away from my capital and then I let it reach my capital city?? Which other "barbarian" army did spare Rome from pillaging?? Did you mention that Aetius was a royal hostage at Buda in the Hunnish court and knew Attila well??

    @wanderlewis8552@wanderlewis855211 ай бұрын
  • No worries. I am subscribed and have pressed the bell button. Excellent video as always. Cheers from Tennessee

    @Hillbilly001@Hillbilly001 Жыл бұрын
  • Subtitles in catalan. VERY WELL! Subscribed forever :)

    @xavierribot7138@xavierribot7138 Жыл бұрын
    • Thank you man. Don't forget the notification bell :)

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
    • @@AdituLaudisMMXXI done!

      @xavierribot7138@xavierribot7138 Жыл бұрын
  • Mulțumesc pentru acest material!

    @mesamesa-pt3ut@mesamesa-pt3ut Жыл бұрын
  • @Aditu Laudis, could format videos of older battles, for example, the Battle of Kadesh, between Hittites and Egyptians, the wars between Hazael and Assyria, the Battle of Karkar, involving Israel, Aram and Assyria. Thanks.

    @marcosbezerra1863@marcosbezerra1863 Жыл бұрын
  • Research will continue in 2024. We HUNGARIANS are a very mixed ethnic group, but current research shows many similarities with the Huns. We are related to the Turks, Uighurs, Huns, Xuanzhuans and many other ethnic groups. I used to say that we are a mixture of many peoples, because we lived a nomadic lifestyle, so it is not surprising that we mixed with many peoples before we arrived in the Carpathian Basin. According to one of the claims, we came from the Uyghurs from today's Ural Mountains or the state of So, which is now China, where the Xuanxuans and the Turks also came from. There are words of Hun origin in our language, for example hitü = faith (in Hungarian, hit). I hope I was able to provide new information. A Hungarian history teacher. And thanks to the site for the great battle scenes!

    @danielbrezovai3141@danielbrezovai314111 күн бұрын
  • More about Spartan, please :)

    @politecatim@politecatim Жыл бұрын
  • Great 😀

    @Anastasia.Sohobos.-di3oo@Anastasia.Sohobos.-di3oo8 ай бұрын
  • Before the Battle of Catalonia, the Huns had already driven the Romans out of Pannonia. As early as 387, Rome surrendered to the Huns to Attila's father, Bendegúz. Both Rome and Constantinople paid taxes to the Huns.

    @istvanhuni7794@istvanhuni7794 Жыл бұрын
    • istvanhuni! -Ennek a pár leírt sornak,maradtak,tárgyi,feltáratlan emlékei,itt a föld alatt.A Polgármester úr betiltotta, az Atila fürdője,vagy Atila temetkezése,stb részletes vizsgálatát.

      @balibambosz333@balibambosz333 Жыл бұрын
    • کیرم تو کون هر چی هون و هون‌پرست

      @jakmachine9279@jakmachine9279 Жыл бұрын
    • Also after the battle the huns raided italy, the battle was ultimately a delaying action instead of a strategic victory.

      @resentfuldragon@resentfuldragon Жыл бұрын
    • Attila's father name was Mundus.

      @neloglass@neloglass11 ай бұрын
    • Отца Аттилы звали Мунзук .

      @user-gs9ts3yk9r@user-gs9ts3yk9rАй бұрын
  • Attila's army entered Gaul in 451. He took the disputed lands of the Franks from the Romans and headed west. On the other hand, although Aetius secured his alliance with the Visigoths, he avoided the war and retreated into Gaul.[5] The Alans who defended the city in Orleans put up a fierce resistance against the Huns who besieged the city. The siege lasted for a long time and Attila set out to return to Hungary for an unknown reason.[5] The perception that the Huns were retreating mobilized Aetius and the Visigoths. They combined with the Alans defending Orleans and followed the Huns and caught up with them at Chalons. The central element of both armies consisted of Inner Asian cavalry. It is probable that there were very few Huns units seen as fugitives or rebels in the Roman army. 6] At the very beginning of the war, when the Visigoth king Theoderid was shot and died by an arrow[6][7] The Visigoths left the battlefield to the Huns and returned to their home base, Toulouse[8] In the narration of Ordanes, his son Thorismud and Aetius, who became the head of the Visigoths after Theoderid's death, broke away from their armies during the war. .Thorismud falls among the Huns at night after the war.He was almost killed before he was rescued by the men of Thorismud, whom the Huns had dropped from his horse.[9] Aetius also finds himself separated from his men in the dark of night and wanders around the enemy lines until he takes refuge in the Visigoth camp.[10] According to Jordanese, he fears a disaster.[11] Details in Jordanes show that the Huns chased the defeated deserted allies to the Roman camp. It is likely that Aetius and Thorismud broke away from their rapidly disintegrating armies during this chase.[8] After this "so-called" defeat, the Huns could not approach the Roman camp because of the rain of arrows.[12] This shows that the Huns blockaded the Romans' camp after the war. As an archaeological remains related to the war, a Hun cauldron was found next to Chalons. This is an indication that the Huns dominated the battlefield after the war. [13][14][15][16][17] After the war, Attila returned to his country with the majority of his army and left some troops in Gaul to secure his back.[18] One year after the war, Attila's entry into Italy and the absence of a force that could resist it indicates that the war resulted in a Hun victory.[1][19] The 452 Gallic chronicle states that Aetius lost his position as auctoritas.[20] Source:Wikipedia

    @resatcetin7298@resatcetin7298 Жыл бұрын
    • ATTILA winner ...Hun armada 452 ROMA ...Italia=hun empire

      @gaborbaki6983@gaborbaki6983 Жыл бұрын
    • @@gaborbaki6983 what did he “win” ?

      @johnconnery1939@johnconnery1939 Жыл бұрын
    • @@johnconnery1939 the end slaves system...the end primitiv ltalien-money system...europe free ...new ltalien empire 1921-1945 Mussolini brigade...Hun empire non slaves non serviense ...non money-terror ...

      @gaborbaki6983@gaborbaki6983 Жыл бұрын
    • @@gaborbaki6983 what are you smoking my friend?

      @johnconnery1939@johnconnery1939 Жыл бұрын
    • @@johnconnery1939 Germanic races are unable to understand that some people do not want to rob others, kill continents, as the Anglo-German equivalent of ,,lebensraum,,

      @gaborbaki6983@gaborbaki6983 Жыл бұрын
  • Interesting title. Attila has fallen so much, that in the next year (452) he conquered Italy and only because of the Pope's begging he was so merciful, that didn't destroyed Roma.

    @lajos-berenyi@lajos-berenyi9 ай бұрын
    • He died not to long after, watch the entire video

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI9 ай бұрын
    • @@AdituLaudisMMXXI depends, what does it mean, that not long after (two years)? Also depends, if someone dies, does it mean, that he has fallen? And even all this doesn't change, that the title is totally fake.

      @lajos-berenyi@lajos-berenyi9 ай бұрын
  • En kaliteli kanallardan birisiniz tebrik ediyorum emeğinize sağlık. Verdiğiniz mesajlardan bizimde ülke olarak almamız gerekenler var. Alabilen almıştır eminim. Ne diyelim anlayana sivrisinek saz..

    @ShoKasugi77@ShoKasugi77 Жыл бұрын
  • Én hallottam olyan előadást amelyben a professor azt mondta hogy nem volt csata.Egy csomó ember meghalt volna értelmetlenül.A másik dolog ha volt ütközet nem a legyőzött szokott helyben maradni hanem a gyöztes.A rómaiak hagyták ott a csatateret.

    @zoltanuszkai4337@zoltanuszkai4337 Жыл бұрын
    • Hamisitott történelem.

      @borbelyistvan1012@borbelyistvan10125 ай бұрын
    • Fentebb én is ezt írtam angolul, hogy a kretén nyugatiak is értsék. Habár nem hiszem, hogy menni fog nekik ahhoz ész is kellene, az meg nincs nekik.

      @dr.d.j.laszlo@dr.d.j.laszlo5 ай бұрын
    • Minden esetre nem találják az állítólagos csatateret. Igazad van ,nem a legyőzött maradt a csatatéren,hanem a győztes,akkoriban még a győztes feladata volt,az elesettek eltemetése . Még valami fontos,a vizi gótok királya elesett,másnap reggelre a gótok eltüntek,számukra az volt fontos ,hogy ki legyen a királyuk. Aetius amikor látta,hogy kevesen vannak ,visszatért Rómába,ahol meggyilkolták. Győztes Hadvezért ki szoktak végezni? Ha Atilla lett volna a vesztes,milyen Hadsereggel indult volna 452-ben Róma ellen? A hunok reflexijjai sokkal távolabbi hatással rendelkeztek,mint az ellenségé . Ugyan az,vagy hasonló játszódhatot le ,mint Carreránál a Pártusok idején !

      @tereziacsizmadia34@tereziacsizmadia345 ай бұрын
    • харош мультики показывать. эту битву народов описали Францисканские монахи наблюдавшие за ней с холма. против 150 нахов во главе с Атиллой из племени гунов. рим выставил 1 миллион солдат. по 300 тыс от рима от галлов и готтов и через 3 дня за счет числености римский генерал Аврелий хотел их окружить зажав к реке Кельн в германии нынешей это. Атилла угадав его план ночью перевел армию через кельн и захватил крепость позади себя осел там а римская армия не решилась пойти вслед за нахами( Аланы Гунны Викинги Англы варяги это все разные названия одного и того же народа с кавказа. Нахов. ведущих свой род от предка Ноха. ( библейского Ноя .Ноаха) Атилла послал за подмогой на родину вестника и через год к нему прибыло еще 250 тыс Нахов. их в европе знают как 1авар- это переводится как пришел пожить. на время. вот там и был воплощен план Барбаросса. 3 удара в разные точки чтоб не дать Риму как раньше обьединиться в миллионную армию как при Колотуанской битве. к тому же пока атилла был в европе на его родину напали Сарматы и нахам пришлось часть войск отсылать на кавказ чтоб обезопасить родину и генералы Курмих и Басих с сыном Атиллы Динцигом через Азовское море вернулись и истребили акациров-сарматов напавших на аланию а потом совершили поход за каспий и там тоже разогнали их логово и после этого про них никто слышал в мире. на самом деле Атилла и Нахи даже не хотели покорять ни рим ни европу они просто преследовали ост-Готов которые вместе со славянами первые напали на аланию перейдя за реки Тина и Итиль на кавказ 600 тыс войском и когда нахи погнали их со своей земли то славяне спрятались выжившие в полуночных землях на севере а ост-готы бежали к западным готам спастись преследуемые гуном Атилой со 150 тыс армией Нахов-Аланов. вот так они и дошли до запада и рим встал на их пути. но после того как рим нанес серьезный урон нахам то они уже решили поквитаться и с Римом. и так и сделали. потом.

      @user-dt7rv3sb9o@user-dt7rv3sb9o3 ай бұрын
    • @@tereziacsizmadia34 why Hungarians care for Atillla or the Huns? Hungarians are Slavs, nothing to do with the Huns

      @OtaBengaBokongo@OtaBengaBokongo11 күн бұрын
  • Atilla elérte célját. Teodorik vizigót király elesett, a vizigótok, a bugundok és a gemán szövetségesek pedig a csatát követő éjszaka folyamán elmenekültek, így Atilla visszatért Hunguriába. Aetius megtépázott légiós gyalogságának semmi esélye nem lett volna Atilla lovasíjász seregével sikeresen szembeszállni. Legütőképesebb hadtestét a hun módra szervezett vizigót lovasság képezte, akik magára hagyták. Nem tehetett mást, elismerte a csata folytatásának hiábavalóságát, és elvonult. Nem kell katonai szakértőnek lenni ahhoz, hogy megértsük mi történt, és ki lett a győztes. A hunok erőfölénye a harcok végén eszerint az ellenfél erejéhez képest nem három az egyhez, hanem sokkal inkább öt az egy arányban viszonyult. Nem ismerünk a történelemben még másik Atilla önmérsékletéhez fogható példát. Miféle vonzalom , számítás vihette rá a hunok nagy királyát a visszavonulásra ? Írja a francia Eric Deschodt 2006-ban Atilla uralkodását és hadi tetteit kivételes tárgyilagossággal és szakértelemmel elemző művében. Atilla megkímélte Aetius életét, mert ütközet esetén elesik. Ez volt az oka Atilla önmérsékletének !

    @magdikaolasz9568@magdikaolasz95689 ай бұрын
    • Magdika,az ilyenekkel kár vitatkozni hiszen nyilvánvaló hogy propagandista történész.Még a Kinai történészek is tudják hogy Katalaumnál a Hunok győztek.

      @attilaambrus9219@attilaambrus92194 ай бұрын
  • Increíble el daño que causaban con sus jinetes arqueros, y que pocas tribus e imperios lograron imitarlos al mismo nivel de disparo extra largo. Incredible the damage caused by their mounted archers, and that few tribes and empires were able to imitate at the same level of extra long range shoot.

    @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131@Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 Жыл бұрын
    • 3. typ.. 1 ..Great-long =türkish-bow 800 meter ...2. Hun-bow medium 600 meter ..3. rapid-bow mongol medium 400-500 meter ....europer arrows 220-300 meter ...

      @gaborbaki6983@gaborbaki6983 Жыл бұрын
    • @@gaborbaki6983 , turkish bow on a horse?, and why they didn't conquer half of the world as them?, although some say thah turks are descendents of huns, and them of mongols...

      @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131@Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 Жыл бұрын
    • @@Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 göktürk empire...hun empire...mongol empire...et Timur kán-Tamerlan sah= turco-mogollar sultan --turan -lideri ...Türkish bow 120 kg -power , grande radius ..minimal problem horse-expedition...

      @gaborbaki6983@gaborbaki6983 Жыл бұрын
    • Нищо не разбирам от шибания ви английски език пишете си едни на други

      @user-vv5xj4lc3f@user-vv5xj4lc3f9 ай бұрын
    • @@Ulises-Gonzalez-3131... well, you're right, the Turks and the Huns are related. The Mongol ruler Genghis Khan had many Turkish/Hun soldiers in his army. Whether the Huns are descended from the Mongols has not yet been fully clarified, as the opinions of many historians differ. But the languages are very similar ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan ... the Turks had a large empire on three continents that lasted 500 years. Why should the sultans expand their empire to the east? It would have been unwise to control and steer such an empire, as we see with the Huns, Romans and Mongols (the Mongol empire did not last long). If you look closely at the standard of the Turkish president, you will see the sun surrounded by 16 small stars at the top left. The sun represents today's Türkiye, the 16 small stars represent the empire of the Turks in history .. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Seal_of_Turkey here is a link to Göktürks .. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6kt%C3%BCrks

      @metehangokturk9696@metehangokturk96965 ай бұрын
  • Well , to me, that's a new version of History here. The Franks played a role on Aetius side. You describe them mostly as ennemies.. Never heard that before. Knowing the benefit the Franks got from the output of this battle I am surprised by this new version.

    @philippeverwaerde3910@philippeverwaerde3910 Жыл бұрын
    • I believe there were two factions inside the Frankish realm. One which sided with the puppet placed by Atilla

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
    • It's a modern Anglo-Saxon version of the story, with the Franks never being well presented on principle (just like the French in the movie "Dunkirk"). As history is not a science ..; moreover, historically, the location of the Catalan fields is arbitrary. And these are not Romans, but Gallo-Romans. Moreover, the francs could naturally be more easily qualified as Belgians ("Gauls"), than as Germans. It's just a question of point of view, given the concrete lack of material for the origin of the francs (which means 'free'; I don't think there was only one free tribe in the Germans ..; and men released from the Roman yoke would have much more reason to call themselves "free men" - in the emancipated sense, It makes more sense from an anthropological point of view ).

      @brunodahli2481@brunodahli2481 Жыл бұрын
  • Great video as always! As a follow-up to this battle, please do a video on the Sack of Aquileia (452 C.E.), where Attila gets his revenge on Aetius by razing the city of Aquileia (considered to be the Venice of the Roman Empire before Venice was established as a city), and causing a massive famine to break out in the Italian peninsula due to his plundering of northern Italy. You should also do more non-historical battles, such as the Ostrogoths vs. the Jutes for Total War: Attila, Odrysian Kingdom vs. Massilia for Total War: Rome II, Otomo vs. Hattori for Total War: Shogun 2, and Zheng Jiang/Tai Bandits vs. Sun Jian/Wu for Total War: Three Kingdoms.

    @malgusvitiate7002@malgusvitiate7002 Жыл бұрын
    • Yeah, too many people see this battle as a roman victory over the huns when in reality it was a last ditch effort to survive that ultimately didn't stop the huns from doing what they wanted. This battle delayed the huns, but attila came back later.

      @resentfuldragon@resentfuldragon Жыл бұрын
    • - Valami nincs rendben! A másik videó határozottan állítja,hogy Atila 452-ben meghalt. Eltemették. Erre később olyan választ kaptam,hogy 455-ben halt meg! A kitett videó,igaz legyen! Atila 62 évesen halt meg?

      @balibambosz333@balibambosz3339 ай бұрын
  • Wonderful channel! Thank you Sir!

    @UltorCXXVIII@UltorCXXVIII27 күн бұрын
    • You are very welcome

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI25 күн бұрын
  • Ich habe mir diese Schlacht bereits im kommentarbereich der Schlacht an der Milvinischen Brücke gewünscht. Ich denke nicht das dieses Video auf meinem Wunsch entstanden ist aber trotzdem danke.

    @marschallhistory3286@marschallhistory3286 Жыл бұрын
    • I take the viewers suggestions, and there are many more waiting :)

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
    • - Tisztelt voster77 hh! Atila itt van eltemetve a városi stand kerítésénél,az áruház parkolója alatt. (Megnézheti!)

      @balibambosz333@balibambosz333 Жыл бұрын
  • best animations… felt like I was there

    @antonychipman3088@antonychipman308810 ай бұрын
    • Thanks

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI10 ай бұрын
    • 😂

      @antonychipman3088@antonychipman308810 ай бұрын
  • epic video...

    @Ukepa@Ukepa9 ай бұрын
    • Glad you liked it

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI9 ай бұрын
  • Ma sem értem. Ha Attila maradt a csata helyszínén és a rómaiak és szövetségeseik elvonultak, hogyan lehet ezt számukra győzelemnek tekinteni? Egyértelmű Hun győzelem volt, a folytatás a teljes megsemmisülést jelentette volna Aetius számára. Lehet, hogy haztérve éppen a dicsőséges győzelme miatt végezték ki Aetiust? Csak gondolkodom.

    @sandortoth7344@sandortoth73448 ай бұрын
    • Igazad van, de mit kezdjünk azzal a sok százmillió európai és amerikai emberrel akik elhitték és továbbra is el fogják hinni ezeket a hunellenes és magyarellenes narrativákat? Mi olyanok vagyunk mint Don Quijote a szélmalmokkal, egy pár millió magyar a hatalmas indoeurópai nyelvű kultúrákkal és mentalitásokkal szemben!

      @Arpoxais1Ateas2@Arpoxais1Ateas28 ай бұрын
    • Egyetértek, én is ezt írtam a kretén nyugatiaknak angolul.

      @dr.d.j.laszlo@dr.d.j.laszlo5 ай бұрын
    • ​@@dr.d.j.laszloHungarians are Slavs, not Huns Grow up

      @OtaBengaBokongo@OtaBengaBokongo11 күн бұрын
  • Could I suggest that in the battle maps you use the internationally recognised symbols to differentiate infantry from cavalry, otherwise good.

    @davidrowsell4603@davidrowsell4603 Жыл бұрын
  • imagine being there seeing this battle in person.... this battle truly molded Europe to what it is today. crazy.. if the huns won history would have been far different

    @thehashslingingslasher6443@thehashslingingslasher6443 Жыл бұрын
    • A Hunok nyertek. Ettől ilyen a történelem ma.

      @sandortoth7344@sandortoth73448 ай бұрын
    • not really! we won all the battles in our European tours, but never conquered any land. The Carpathian Valley is more precious and fruitful than any other country in Europe!

      @aranykert@aranykert3 ай бұрын
  • Yes.. total war games is the best for depicting historical battle

    @piggyback8367@piggyback8367 Жыл бұрын
  • Stunning representation of the scale of this and such (LARGER ?) engagements. Thwarting Attila made perfect sense if the objective was restoring this territory to Rome- AND the empire would not reach critical mass at home.

    @dutchhoke6555@dutchhoke65557 ай бұрын
  • One year after the battle, the Huns were already at the walls of Rome. This was painted in fresco in the Vatican. Unfortunately, it gives bad knowledge.

    @istvanhuni7794@istvanhuni7794 Жыл бұрын
    • Exactly.

      @senkialfonz895@senkialfonz895 Жыл бұрын
  • 🤣🤣🤣...¿Cómo que la caída de Atila? 🤣🤣🤣...¿Qué hizo al año siguiente Atila en el Norte de Italia? 😎

    @elhunoatila1@elhunoatila1 Жыл бұрын
    • - 452 vagy 453 Atila halála.(Most nem írom ide,hogyan halt meg Atila.) Nem csatában esett el! A következő években Atila,egy fa szarkofágban,a temetkezési kamrájában,(A mai Áruház Busz parkoló alatt pihent.) - Tisztelt ellhunoatila nem godolja komolyan,hogy halott Atila csatázni járt? Valami nincs rendben az egész ide kitett videóval? A videóban minden fordítva van,mint ahogyan történt...-Na mind 1! megnéztem!

      @balibambosz333@balibambosz333 Жыл бұрын
    • @@balibambosz333 A videó az események tipikus római változatán alapul. Kár, hogy a hunok nem hagytak írásokat. Úgy gondolom, hogy a csata technikai döntetlen és taktikai visszalépés volt. Róma annyira megtépázott, hogy a következő évben már nem tudta megvédeni Itáliát Attila támadásától, így a katalóniai csatát a hunok győzelme jelentette.

      @elhunoatila1@elhunoatila1 Жыл бұрын
    • @@elhunoatila1 - A leírásnál,fordításnál,úgy lehet olvasni,hogy a Gótok Királyát a lovak halálra taposták..(Éjjel sötétben leesett a lóról) Később megtalálták,de már halott volt... Valami más is történt,mert a Gótok elvonultak új királyt választani...Vagy összevesztek a rómaiakkal? Aecio római hadvezér,éjjel menekülés közben a hunok táborába tévedt.A hunok nem bántották, az hitték tárgyalni jött...(Korábban Aeciot a hunok is nevelték...) A hunok ismerték,és Ő is ismerte, a hun szokásokat...A történészek vitatkoznak,hogy volt csata? Vagy nem történt meg?Furcsa feljegyzés,hogy a hunok a csatatéren maradnak..."Farkasként üvöltenek,"(Idéztem), dobolnak,és vonyítanak."Néha lóra kapnak,és kilovagolnak...Keresték az ellenséget...(Ezt külön is megkérdeztük az előadótól,hogy mit jelent? ) Miért dobolnak,miért vonyítanak? Ha nem volt csata,nem lehet döntetlen...A csata előtt az ellenfél,rómaiak,és a Gótok is lelépett:...A Hunok még 3 napig maradtak...Várták a felvonuló ellenséget...De az nem történt meg...Kettes változat. Éjjel volt a csata! A Hunok szerettek éjjel,vagy Hajnalban csatázni...A hatalmas zavar, ,keveredés, az ellenfél táborában, a Hunok támadása idézte elő,hogy a lovak eltaposták a Gótok Királyát...A rómaiak jól látták,hogy a Gótok nélkül,számukra,megsemmisítő vereség várható. A Gótok bizonytalan szereplése,talán ,már a csata ,vagy a felvonulás után,Ők is azt gondolták,a római vezér, a Hunokkal tárgyal. Atila 452 vagy 453 körül halt meg...Nem engedték,hogy a megtalált temetkezését,közelről vizsgáljuk...Halott vezér,(Beteg vezér,) Nem csatázik...A vesztes csata után a Hunok,nem vezettek volna a következő évben nagyszabású hadjáratot Atila vezetésével Itáliába...Az évszámok is hibás lehet...De a teljes,gondos ,vizsgálatot,a megtalált tárgyakon,betiltották...Atila fürdőjére, mindenre,a Polgármester úr,két nagy dupla vas rácsot,két nagy vas láncot,és két hatalmas lakatot tett! Ha erre jár,távolról megnézheti...Ez van! Tilos az eseményeket,közelről vizsgálni!

      @balibambosz333@balibambosz333 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@elhunoatila1- a hunok, már akkor irtak , amikor a legtöbb európai nép még nem is létezett..... ! * :)

      @gyulaerdei3180@gyulaerdei31803 ай бұрын
    • Legyőzte Rómát ! ! ! * Adót a vesztes szokott fizetni a győztesnek ! ..... Ez a fő baj Atilával....Róma fizette az adót ! ! ! * :)

      @gyulaerdei3180@gyulaerdei31803 ай бұрын
  • And I love your strategy introduction, too. (More detailed than TotalWarBattles)

    @politecatim@politecatim Жыл бұрын
    • Thanks

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
  • 先收藏,以后再看。

    @user-fo5ik5uq4b@user-fo5ik5uq4b Жыл бұрын
  • Good video brother. One constructive criticism. X is for infantry / is for cavalry. According to your map everyone is on foot.

    @pilomalik9696@pilomalik96966 ай бұрын
    • Thanks for that!

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI6 ай бұрын
  • Hind sight being 20-20, Attila would have accomplish a decisive defeat on the Romans if he could of further drew him into open territory. As it was Attila stopped and encamped a mile or so into open country. The Romans had their backs to restricted terrain and thus were protected from encirclement. If they had moved further into open territory then the exceptional Hun cavalry would have been able to surround them and cut them to pieces. War is always full of what ifs, but as I said I would have encamped farther away from the Romans and force them to come to him. This would have most surely of happened since the Romans were the ones perusing.

    @stevensrhester8594@stevensrhester8594 Жыл бұрын
  • Nicely done, but one mention about the visual effects on battle map. Why there are no differences between different types of units, archers, light/heavy infantry and cavalry, romans and their allies? At least minimum differences should be. In rest gj!!

    @N_Sbn_Ur@N_Sbn_Ur Жыл бұрын
  • I do love watching the huge army on the move.

    @RickGamer123@RickGamer123 Жыл бұрын
  • I often couldn't tell the combatants apart, but apparently they couldn't either, LOL!

    @roderickreilly9666@roderickreilly966611 ай бұрын
    • pretty much :P

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI11 ай бұрын
  • جميل جدا أستمر

    @ALhslnl@ALhslnl Жыл бұрын
  • So, the battle of the Catalaunian Plains was NOT the fall of Atilla the Hun.

    @seaninflorida9741@seaninflorida9741 Жыл бұрын
    • Not directly

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
  • Given the confusion, lack of clear goals, repeated engagements with various allies, etc., most wars seem to me like little more than a harsh and inefficient method of population control.

    @pickleballer1729@pickleballer1729 Жыл бұрын
    • Most of Earth was empty. This was a long time before Paul Ehrlichs book "Population Bomb"

      @rudolfborsics6608@rudolfborsics66086 ай бұрын
  • Parabéns pelo trabalho! Fantástico!

    @guerranapaz6246@guerranapaz62468 ай бұрын
    • Thank you!

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI8 ай бұрын
  • I enjoyed the description of the conflict. The Germans referred to it as the 'Hunnenschlachtlied' in which tale annually the spirits of the fallen Germans and Huns arose on the anniversary of the battle and fought once more in the same hilly land. In legend one million men fought that day. Incidentally, I thought the general view was that Attila killed his brother, Breda, for some reason. As for Aetius, I had read that his Roman legionaires were mostly German recruits. He himself might be Germanic, taking a Roman, or Romanized variant when he joined the Roman Army. At any rate the Germanic tribal alliance could certainly use the well-trained Roman legion(s) which Aetius commanded. To add a family-feud-type ingredient, the Goths of the east (Ostrogoths) were vassals of Attila's Huns, paying tribute each year. Part of that relationship might mean contributing troops to an Attila war scheme.

    @johnsavers1168@johnsavers1168 Жыл бұрын
    • Aetius was a Roman Citizen of Scythian origins.

      @lucatampellini9734@lucatampellini9734 Жыл бұрын
    • @@lucatampellini9734 If this is factual, it accords well with the historical westward migration: Sacae>Scythians>Germanic tribes. Another line involved the Gauthei>Gothi>Getae>Goths>Gauls. Since they were all found together with the Scythians, many historians believe they originated with the Sacae. There seemed to be a strong link with the Northern Kingdom of Israel, which was taken into bondage and placed in "the land of Goshen, Habor and the Medes." They never returned to Israel. The tribe of Dan seemed to have eluded this bondage by taking to the sea and colonizing southern and western Europe. However, 200,000 of Judah were seized from the northern areas of that kingdom and taken into the Assyrian bondage, along with the Northern Kingdom. This was a massive effort on Assyria's part, as the Northern Kingdom was estimated to be about eleven million people at that time. It is important in tracing these matters to recall that the Hebrew language was typically written without vowels. Thus, for example, the tribe of Dan might leave its colonizing mark as 'Dan,' 'Dun' ('Dunne'), 'Den,' 'Din,' 'Don' etc. The name 'Donnell' might be originally 'Dan El' ('Dan of God, tribe thereof). 'Bogdan' seemed to be another of these traces found in the Balkans. From Greece to Ireland one could find the marks of Dan. If this is true of Dan, it may well be true of others. For example, Juteland, if properly pronounced, would be 'Ju•te' or 'Ju•tah', which accords with the tribe of Judah. Also, Judah was the royal tribe whereto the sceptre had been assigned. It seems many European kings arose in the area. Parenthetically, the Holy Roman Empire of Charlemagne embraced almost the entirety of the Germanic peoples. One might conclude that the Northern Kingdom of Israel had been transferred into Europe where it was reconstituted. Some might see the hand of God in this. Be that as it may, we know from Scripture that the people of the Hebrew covenant were to be called "in Isaac's name" ('Saac' or 'SC'). One of the last kings of Israel was Omri. The Assyrians pronounced the initial part of the name with a 'gh' or 'kh' guttural sound, producing a 'khumri' or 'ghomri.' Scholars conclude that the Cymbri of Wales derived naturally from this. So to, the Cimmerians and Gauthei. After all, in the Hebrew language, 'Omri' might be supplied with our 'e' or 'i' and been pronounced 'Khimri' or something akin. Just in passing, you may recall the story in Scripture of "the coat of many colors." In the Cecil B. DeMille Hollywood rendering, this coat was depicted as a 'rainbow pattern.' However, this was surely all wrong. Referencing the Scythians again, this people migrated to some extent eastward as well as westward. There was discovered in China in modern times a mummy which did not bear the characteristics of the Chinese people anatomically or culturally (dress and accessaries). The mummy had a nordic bone structure and reddish-blonde or brown hair. It was wrapped in a woolen blanket or coat of many colored threads. Hence, one could immediately infer it was similar to the sweaters, blankets, shawls and coats commonly produced in Ireland and Scotland. From this mummy I believe that we can deduce the Scythians-Goths-Germanic people's generally appearance at that time, which was Caucasian and their culture bearing links to Israel, including 'clothing of blends of many colors.' The above, which I linked with the mummy discovery in northeastern China, may be thin, I'll admit, but its seemed consistent with the great migration of the Sacae-Scythian-Goth-Germanic people into Eurasia and, thereafter, into central and western Europe. Also, I am careful not to speak loosely regarding 'Hebrew' and 'Israel.'

      @johnsavers1168@johnsavers1168 Жыл бұрын
    • @@lucatampellini9734 Yes indeed

      @enricomanno8434@enricomanno8434 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@johnsavers1168 Pure speculation and very biased Hebrew centric approach to the history The chronology doesn't match

      @enricomanno8434@enricomanno8434 Жыл бұрын
    • In Eastern steppe empires there is a tradition of dual leadership, so Attila did not kill his brother!

      @szapemi@szapemi Жыл бұрын
  • Spiace, una grande inesattezza! Ma Attila si fermò prima di arrivare a Roma grazie all'incontro con Sua Santita Papa Leone I

    @paolohollit7400@paolohollit74002 ай бұрын
  • Oh wowwww

    @phesachahawahacha2174@phesachahawahacha2174 Жыл бұрын
  • Az nem zavar, hogy Katalónia az Ibériai-félszigeten van, a catalaunumi csata helyszíne meg a mai Franciaország területén?

    @csabaiandras9861@csabaiandras9861 Жыл бұрын
    • It seems Google translate does not get the translation right from english

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
  • Wow how does Total war Attila run so well on your pc ?

    @aymenberhili8218@aymenberhili8218 Жыл бұрын
  • On the battle map you show all units as infantry. You need to distinguish which is which.

    @allenhamilton6688@allenhamilton6688 Жыл бұрын
    • Noted

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
  • Attila is still alive, in the person of the Chuvash people (Suvars) they have preserved their language, but he is dying, his name is translated as father, father of peoples

    @user-pd3jn8jp6w@user-pd3jn8jp6w Жыл бұрын
    • A nevét Isten ostora- ként maradt fenn. A királyok Királya. 13 koronával temették el, hármas koporsóban, a hazájában, Magyarországon.

      @sandortoth7344@sandortoth73448 ай бұрын
    • Угр - Аттила никакого отношения не имеет к чувашам , удмурты , ханты , коми , мари - гунны !

      @user-gs9ts3yk9r@user-gs9ts3yk9rАй бұрын
  • While its true that there was some controversy about the origin of the Huns, the consensus after recent decades is that they were Turks of Oghuric affiliation, mostly based on credible studies confirming that the vast majority of attested Hunnic names, as well as all Hunnic successor clans are of evident Oghur Turkic origin. All Hunnic tribes (entirely Oghur Turkic) : Akatziri, Onogurs, Utigurs, Sabirs, Bulgars, Saragurs, Kutrigurs, Barsils, Balanjars Recorded Hunnic names of Turkic origin : Aigan = moon prince; from Turkic aï & can Alp Ilutuer / Ilteber = heroic chieftain; from Turkic alp & iltäbär Althias = six; from Turkic Alti Akkagas = white rock; from Turkic ak & kayač Atakam = elder shaman; from Turkic ata & kam Balach = calf; from Turkic Malaq Berik = strong; from Turkic Berık Basik = governor; from Turkic Bârsiğ Bleda = wise; from Turkic Bildä Bochas = either gullet; from Turkic Boğuz; or bull, from Buqa Dengizich = ocean-like, heavenly; from Turkic teɲez & dêɲri; or, more simply, great lake Donat / Donatu = horse; from Turkic Yonat Edeco = good; from Turkic Ädgü Ellac = to rule; from Turkic el & lä Emmedzur = horse lord; from Turkic Ämäcur Eskam / Esqam = companion of the shaman; from Turkic Eŝkam Hereka / Kreka = pure princess; from Turkic Arïqan Ernakh / Hernac = small man, heroic man; from Turkic Ernäk Iliger = prince man; from Turkic ilig & är Karadach = black mountain; from Turkic Qaradağ Karaton = black cloak; from Turkic Qarâton Kursik = either noble; from Turkic Kürsiğ; or belt-bearer, from Qurŝiq Kutilzis = blessed herald; from Turkic kut & elči Mundzuk = bead; from Turkic Munčuq Oebarsius / Aybars = moon leopard, from Turkic Aïbârs; or dun leopard, from oy & bars Oldogan / Odolgan = either red falcon; from Turkic al & dogan; or chubby, from Tolgun Oktar / Uptar = brave; from Turkic Öctär Ruga / Rua = wise man; from Turkic Ögä Turgun = still/calm; from Turkic Turkun Uldin = six; from Turkic Alti Zolban = shepherd star; from Turkic Čolpan.

    @papazataklaattiranimam@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
    • i'm shocked, another turk claiming somebody else was a turk, they were not turks, they came from the Xiongnu Empire. They were not Turks, any credible unbiased source will tell you that they were NOT.

      @franklinfisher497@franklinfisher497 Жыл бұрын
    • Oghur tam olarak ne demek ?

      @tnrz5696@tnrz5696 Жыл бұрын
    • ATTILA-etele =volga river birth ..europe hun Hun army 70% oguz-onogur ..15% mongol et 15% mandzsu-tunguz-yuezhi ...turco-mogollar armada

      @gaborbaki6983@gaborbaki6983 Жыл бұрын
    • according the turboturks everybody is turk...anyhow huns ruled the stepps way before turks emerged so to turks were one of the vassal of them

      @latakicsi2183@latakicsi2183 Жыл бұрын
    • @@latakicsi2183 idiots -dzsukell... Hun langue ..old-türk...old-bolgar....Hun armada 60% türk-oguz ....et 20% mongol et 20% tunguz-mandzu/kushan-kusu- bird totem/... sztyeppe-riders unió

      @gaborbaki6983@gaborbaki6983 Жыл бұрын
  • Alans also fought alongside Huns. Attila won, he stayed on the battlefield and the enemy retreated

    @ATTILA84@ATTILA8416 күн бұрын
  • A római krónikák szerint a rómaiak, a hun krónikák szerint a hunok győztek ! Ez tehát egy győzelemmel, felérő döntetlen volt. Attila visszavonult szekérvárába és a következő tavaszon Bizánc ellen indult. A nagy pestisjárvány vetett véget a harcnak egy időre.

    @user-db9kv7fz9m@user-db9kv7fz9m5 ай бұрын
  • Hamis videó ..... ! * A a római - Aetius bukott el.... ! *

    @gyulaerdei3180@gyulaerdei31803 ай бұрын
  • Rome and Pope Leo panicked when the news of the great famine in Catalonia arrived. Atilla King of the Huns had won everything, and there was no doubt that he would deal mercilessly with the traitors. They also knew that the Huns knew exactly every detail of the conspiracy. Aetius arrived at Ravenna at the head of the remaining legions, where they tried to honor him with a great victory celebration. He knew very well that with this they were trying to appease the Roman citizenry and themselves. Atilla returned to the Carpathian basin to rest and soon turn against Ravenna and Rome. It was also clear that the cowardly Byzantine Marcianus could not be counted on militarily at all. They also knew that the remaining Roman forces would be unable to stop Attila's army. Everyone needs to know more about Atilla, because the German researcher Heribert Illig found out that there are big dark holes in the historical universe sky. He uncovered such a loophole in his work entitled "Invented Centuries", in which he exposed the great forgery of the papacy and found out that the Frankish emperor Charles the Great was indeed "Fictitious Charles", his reign and his brilliant deeds were just a big fiction! "Official" historians remain silent or deny the authenticity of the discovery, but more objective researchers sensed the truth. After breaking through the wall of silence, the contours of reality are revealed. The researchers found out that Károly Fiktív's huge bargain was intended to cover up something and someone. The someone was none other than Atilla the King of the Huns. The something, on the other hand, was the great Hun Empire extending from the Ural-Altay to the Iberian Peninsula, which disappeared from the stage of history almost without a trace along with the Huns of Sittia and the Avar Gepids of at least ten million.

    @magdikaolasz9568@magdikaolasz956810 ай бұрын
  • Appreciate your efforts but PLEASE factor in narrator audio vs sound effects (as good as they are). Tweak down the effects a little so we can understand better.

    @yomommaahotoo264@yomommaahotoo2644 ай бұрын
    • Thanks for the feedback

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI4 ай бұрын
  • Van baj a fejben.

    @attila9441@attila944111 ай бұрын
  • Nice Coneheads/Smurf hats on those soldiers haha

    @forexdragon@forexdragon Жыл бұрын
  • I dont think this battle was the knockout-blow it used to be seen as. Aetius didnt risk a pursuit. Atilla was still able to invade Italy the following year.

    @mango2005@mango20055 ай бұрын
    • It wasn’t

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI5 ай бұрын
  • It was very problematical to follow the events on the "reference map" as all the units from both sides appearing on it where misrepresented as infantry ("X") as some were actually cavalry ("/"). Distinguishing between the cavalry units and the infantry units and where they were located relative to each other by using the appropriate icons would have helped explain better how this battle unfolded.

    @raymondhall3682@raymondhall3682 Жыл бұрын
    • Understood

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
  • From the Hungarian side it was the fall of the Roman Empire. After one week of bloody battle in constant rain, the loss was tremendous on both sides. The gothic ally of the romans lost their king and they left the battlefield. Next morning no Army was standing against each other. There were three days waiting on the battlefield without fight and Atilla started to retreat as the Romans did the same. This is all fiction in the video!

    @aranykert@aranykert10 ай бұрын
    • Ez az adása egy bunkónak , nem más mint lejáratásunk . Stb...

      @attilatasciko4817@attilatasciko48177 ай бұрын
  • Bien

    @Luis-lm2lg@Luis-lm2lg3 ай бұрын
  • Great video. The picture of Attila appears to very appropriate, since the Huns had been in Europe for several generations and no doubt did a little mixing with the natives.

    @chucklynch6523@chucklynch6523 Жыл бұрын
    • Thanks Chuck!

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI Жыл бұрын
    • Not at all. According to the contemporary Roman historian Priscus, Attila as well as the Huns had a typical north east asian look. The Huns consisted of two groups, the ruling class and the ruled. The ruling class was small numbers of those east asian hordes such as Mongol, Manchu, Xianbei or Xiongnu (FYI. there were so many bigger or smaller east asian nomad nations throughout central and north east asia)while the ruled were the people who were gradually annexed by the Huns on the way to the west. The history says that the Romans didn't know where the Huns came from and this give us very important clue. If they were from Turkey or somewhere near, Romans could write so. There were nothing mysterious about the huns in that case. It is really funny that the western historians are trying their absolute best to ignore the record from Priscus, one of the most important and reliable sources regarding the huns as well as attila, and people still think Attila was some sort of middle eastern lol. Do you guys feel shame or get your ego hurt if you guys were conquered and destoryed twice by the North East Asians? I wonder. Is that the reason? In short, were the huns Turkish? No, turkish people were one of those who ruled by the huns. were they inflused by the huns? Yes the turkish were culturally influenced by the huns so they still have some east asian heritages but that's all about it. You know, Vietnamese were ruled by French for a while and they were culturally influenced by French, however that doesnt make the French or Joan d'arc as their ancestor, nor have French Vietnamese look but why portray Atiila as caucaisan? Is that some sort of joke?

      @iigel352@iigel352 Жыл бұрын
    • Priscos rhetor - Atillát...folyamatosan Szkitának nevezi ..... ! :) - mint ahogy a Magyarokat is Szkitának hivják ... ! :)

      @gyulaerdei3180@gyulaerdei31803 ай бұрын
  • Atilla came to Rome the following year and the title of the video is Atilla's Fall. good for attention

    @galipemreklnc4815@galipemreklnc4815 Жыл бұрын
    • В Италии началась эпидемия чумы , поэтому Аттила увел свои войска .

      @user-gs9ts3yk9r@user-gs9ts3yk9rАй бұрын
  • How ironic it is that the westerners are still scarced by Attila after 1500 years?!?!? Attila's empire survived in the Hungarian Kingdom for centuries - while the Roman Empire collapsed in 476. And Hungary is still in the middle of Europe. And still shows the only right way to the West in nowdays too!!!

    @dr.d.j.laszlo@dr.d.j.laszlo3 ай бұрын
    • That's right!

      @aranykert@aranykert3 ай бұрын
  • Can you do Sassanids vs Huns? No one has covered it so far with cinematics from total war.

    @TapanKumarNaskar-gh5lg@TapanKumarNaskar-gh5lg5 ай бұрын
    • Any specific battle?

      @AdituLaudisMMXXI@AdituLaudisMMXXI5 ай бұрын
    • @@AdituLaudisMMXXI yes. Please do King Khosrow I defeating the Huns. Battles of Gol Zarriun.

      @TapanKumarNaskar-gh5lg@TapanKumarNaskar-gh5lg5 ай бұрын
  • Without the Goths the Roman’s wouldn’t have stood a chance at all. The Goths were direct descendants of the Scythians, the original horse lords of the steppe, and they knew how to fight the Huns

    @genXdoom72@genXdoom7213 күн бұрын
  • I can't imagine being absolutely covered in blood from head to toe...and nowhere to wash up.

    @david9783@david978311 ай бұрын
  • Aetius elhagyta a csatateret ! - feladta a küzdelmet ..... :)

    @gyulaerdei3180@gyulaerdei31803 ай бұрын
  • ❤❤❤

    @berndbecker7833@berndbecker7833 Жыл бұрын
  • I would get tired in about ten minutes. Need a break.

    @BrianSmith-gp9xr@BrianSmith-gp9xr Жыл бұрын
  • Ha jobb filmet akarsz, akkor megérted a Róma által elnyomott királyságok csatlakozását is.

    @PemaDordzse@PemaDordzse Жыл бұрын
  • When we say the name of Balambér's Hun grand prince or king (rex Hunnorum), we are immediately met with the statement that we know almost nothing about him and that his name is the only one left to us from the pen of the Gothic historian Jordanes (? - 553). They do not even mention the reports from Amminaus Marcelinus, or the data of the Chinese Vei su Chinese chronicle, or the descriptions of the Djagfar Tarihi, and I could list more. It is as if the excellent Hun Grand Duke had been written out of history. The meaning of Balambér's name is derived from the Germanic name Baldemar instead of Bulyar-Bulumar. Ámbátor could be called Baldemár (bold) in their own language, but the Turkish word Bulyar means "of more blood". The Djagfar Tarihi describes his father as Djilka (? - 363), his mother a Sarmatian princess called Vadamerca, so he was born in a mixed marriage "of several bloods". They describe the names of his ancestors and descendants and we can't even be surprised to find the names of Atilla, Ügyek, Álmos or even Árpád on the family tree. Together with his father, Balambér conquers the Arsacid diastina of the Alans and its people, and after his father's death, he invades the empire of the Eastern Goths and destroys the army of King Ermanrik. The Huns make the direct descendant of the king who fell in battle, Hunimund (an interesting name!), the lord of the conquered Eastern Goths, while the rebels continue to fight with the counter-king Vithimir. Not long after, in the spring of 375, Vithimir falls in a bloody battle, the remaining part of his army surrenders or flees with the loss of his head among the Western Goths. Athanarich, the king of the Western Goths, thought he could resist the Huns, but he was wrong, and in the end he himself had to flee. Some of the Western and Eastern Goths asked for admission to the Eastern Roman Empire, while the rest of the Goths surrendered to the weapons of the Balambéres. Within a short time (in 377), an internal conflict developed between the Romans and the Goths, and to their greatest surprise, the Goths called the Huns to help themselves.

    @szapemi@szapemi Жыл бұрын
  • Fun Fact: they had a large number of Germanic tribe's man apart of the hun army, Blessed Be.

    @baronghede2365@baronghede2365 Жыл бұрын
  • La battaglia non fu in Catalogna, ma a Chatulons. Il nome si assomiglia ma geograficamente sono 2 posti relativamente lontani.

    @lucatampellini9734@lucatampellini9734 Жыл бұрын
  • Because the Huns managed to eliminate the king of their rivals and, most importantly, they had possession of the battlefield after the end of the battle, the outcome was likely a Hun victory., Hyun Jin Kim (2013). The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe. Cambridge University Press. pp. 76-77

    @papazataklaattiranimam@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
    • The Romans were there too.

      @timothylee2772@timothylee277211 ай бұрын
KZhead