END of the Boeing 737 cause of this Airbus! Here's Why
END of the Boeing 737 cause of this Airbus! Here's Why
===
00:00 Intro
00:44 History background
04:05 The birth of the 737
06:20 The 737 remaining competitive
09:55 Concluding
===
END of the Boeing 737 cause of this Airbus! Here's Why
It has been 57 years since the Boeing 737, affectionately dubbed the Baby Boeing or the Work Horse of the skies, took its first flight in 1967. Being known for its efficiency and versatility, Boeing is the best-selling commercial jet airliner in history with over 10,000 having been built. How is possible for Boeing to not only run such a long-lasting production for an airplane model but also make it even more competitive until now? And is there an in-sight end for this aircraft? Let’s find out!
END of the Boeing 737 cause of this Airbus! Here's Why
But before we start, if you haven't subscribed to our channel yet, please like, comment, and subscribe so you'll be the first to see our next videos. Now, let’s dive in!
History background
To answer these questions we need to delve into the history of the aircraft.
Surprisingly, the 737 was initially conceived as a temporary solution by Boeing. Preceding its inception, Boeing introduced the Boeing 727 in the 1960s to cater to the short to medium-haul market.
END of the Boeing 737 cause of this Airbus! Here's Why.However, the 727's design posed inherent compromises, with divergent airline preferences for power, economy, and operational requirements. To be exact, some airlines wanted a really powerful jet that could fly in and out of short runways at high-density altitudes, whilst other airlines preferred something with only two engines for a better overall economy. Some airlines needed at least three engines to ensure safe over-water flights, as regulations prohibited twin-engine aircraft from being more than 60 minutes away from an alternate airport.
The 737 was Boeing's chicken with the golden eggs. But they outlived it and it died of old age. Very smart Boeing.
A220 is vastly superior to fly in than the 737. Bonus is it’s not a Boeing!
Hi from France ! Airbus loose money selling A220, it's an expensive plane to produce. Fun fact The A220 competes with the A320.
Load of rubbish
EXCELENTE CANAL...
There are several hiccups in an otherwise clearly-delivered narration - particularly incoherent in the case of the Concorde (timeline 5:42). You make an interesting description of the launches of the B727 and DC-9, and I hadn't realised the Rolls Royce Spey engine was initially earmarked for the rear-engine B727 until the more powerful P&W JT8D became available. But you completely fail to mention the Spey-powered, twin-engine, two-pilot BAC One Eleven, which entered service about a year before the similarly-configured DC-9. The One Eleven initially sold well in the U.S. and elsewhere until sales were eclipsed by the DC-9 and then the B737. Its main limitation was the lower thrust potential of the Spey. You go on to mention that the slimness of the JT8D enabled it to be mounted easily underwing on the B737 (series 100 & 200), but fail to illustrate the slimness of the nacelles - instead showing footage of later CFM-56 installations. Those slim JT8D nacelles are reflected to this day by the unalterable geometry of the 737's main landing gear. That necessitated repositioning the CFM56's accessory gearbox to the side of the engine to achieve ground clearance, creating its characteristic, non-circular cowling installation. Much later and less happily, the CFM-LEAP engine has had to be mounted forward and upward on the 737MAX, affecting aerodynamics and longitudinal stability.
thanks for your sharing ✈️✈️✈️
Boeing.. promises the future but builds on the past. 1950s 737. 1960s 777. Old aircraft with new UNSUITABLE bit’s added. The 777x will tank just like the 737 max. Airbus is the way to go.
Boeing could have purchased the CSeries program for $2.00 outbidding Airbus who purchased the program for $1.00. The Airbus A220-500 and A220-700 engineering has already been planned and for the most part already completed which will replace the bulk of the 737Max and A320NEO aircraft.
Interesting However whatever subscribe notification system you have been using is much to be desired1 Every MINUTE!? Plus that annoy thing noise this is CLICKBAIT on an otherwise interesting video. It is highly distracting and interrupts what you are trying to say! Please find another system that isn't so blatantly annoying (you may even unfortunately inadvertently LOSE likes and subscribers!) Thanks.
Wow Airbus fanboy much? Airbus is a good aircraft and so is Boeing...
Technically, the 737 is an ok airplane. However, the problem is the quality issues at Boeing and the lack of transparency at Boeing at the moment. The case with the plug door on the Alaska Airlines MAX-9 is ridiculous since Boeing claim they do not have any documentation about the installation of the plug door which should be considered in the light that this was a brand new airplane being assembled where everything shall be documented always. If Boeing cleaned up their act and ensured top quality all the time, Boeing would have a perfect product but they have so far been unable to do that.
Bloody hell who on Earth wrote the script for this Video, so many wrong uses of words with AI getting them wromg and in the wrong context. I sure wont be subscribing to this overly verbose rubbish !!