Sam Altman's plans to prove humanness in the age of AI | Worldcoin Tiago Sada
How can we differentiate between humans and AI in the future? Sam Altman has initiated the Worldcoin project in preparation for the future. In this video, Tiago, the Head of Product at Tools for Humanity, introduces the project. Worldcoin utilizes blockchain technology to verify individuals with irises, proving their unique human identity. This aims to distinguish between bots and humans in the AI era. Worldcoin has secured a $250 million investment from investors including Blockchain Capital and a16z.
00:00 intro
00:55 Chapter 1. How to differentiate people in the age of AI?
05:20 Chapter 2. Tools for the future predicted by Sam Altman
EO stands for Entrepreneurship & Opportunities. We're looking for more inspiring stories of entrepreneurs all over the world, so don't hesitate to contact us! :)
Subscribe EO Channel
🌏 👉🏻👉🏻 bit.ly/3S0Pacc
Feature Inquiry
💼 👉🏻👉🏻 [partner@eoeoeo.net](mailto:partner@eoeoeo.net) EO
Twitter
🖌 👉🏻👉🏻 / eo__global
EO Podcast 🎧
- Spotify: bit.ly/442cRa1
- Apple Podcast: apple.co/3oH3NHC
- Google Podcast: bit.ly/40E1d2v
Subtitles for this video were created using [XL8.ai](xl8.ai/) machine translation.
Access EO’s premium & unreleased content in EO Builders, a community of thriving founders & future builders worldwide builders-club.webflow.io/ ✅ Meet the founders featured on EO through Builders Webinars ✅ Join Cohort-based learning programs from top-tier VCs and thoght leaders ✅ Be a part of the global network of driven entrepreneurs
World Big brother is coming
Who ?
@@shaheryarkhan7131a dictator in a dystopian world in a novel called 1984 by George orwell.
You guys got in Sam Altman.. Congratulations EO team.. great efforts
Abhi kon se des me KYC ho rha he
Let´go for the next bullrun of the WLD
❤❤❤
You flip it off. If it flips you off back or get's angry. It's a human.
Not at all, ai can be programmed to react like that easily.
@@phasematerialsresearch9319 It really depends on what you mean by anger. I'd like to see you do it.
@@itzhexen0 a weak argument depends on subjective definitions.
@@CuriousCatteryGo ahead and debate. I don't care.
@@itzhexen0 apathy towards your original statement and subsequent argument is also a weak argument.