RC Solar Plane Flight Duration Test

2020 ж. 21 Там.
1 670 999 Рет қаралды

SimpliSafe is award -winning home security that keeps your home safe around the clock. It's really reliable, easy to use, and there are no contracts. Check out SimpliSafe here: simplisafe.com/rctestflight
Instagram: @danielriley_
RCTESTFLIGHT Discord Server: / discord
RCTESTFLIGHT Merch: teespring.com/stores/rctestfl...
Music from Musicbed: share.mscbd.fm/danielriley

Пікірлер
  • Working as an engineer in a experimental solar technology department in Vilnius (Lithuania). I have full access to excess amounts of bifacial monocrystalline cells (152x152mm at 23%efficiency), regular polycrystalline cells (152x152mm at 16%efficiency) as well as solar film. It's efficiency is low at just 12%, but it barely weights anything, is sturdy to mechanical forces and is flexible (you can cover all the surfaces with it). Solar film is something me and my team are working hard on right now, I'd be happy to offer you all the extra we're expeced to have soon during launch of mass production. Have a great day!

    @ParaglidingManiac@ParaglidingManiac3 жыл бұрын
    • When will the solar film go on sale?

      @natekwezi9242@natekwezi92423 жыл бұрын
    • Where can i buy your products?

      @michaelwithington5934@michaelwithington59343 жыл бұрын
    • @@natekwezi9242 Solar film is expected to be introduced by Valoe (that's us) in late 2021. But it's sketchy to predict anything for sure, so I'd stick to being pessimistic (realistic) if I were you.

      @ParaglidingManiac@ParaglidingManiac3 жыл бұрын
    • @@michaelwithington5934 SoliTek cells (Vilnius) for bifacial monocrystalline and/or poly-cells. Film cells are currently on 2nd stage of process of launching manufacturing.

      @ParaglidingManiac@ParaglidingManiac3 жыл бұрын
    • @@ParaglidingManiac Well I'll be very interested in these whenever they come out, I'm currently working on solar powered drones in my university, anyway to reduce the weight would helpful

      @natekwezi9242@natekwezi92423 жыл бұрын
  • home surveilance drone, each morning at 9am have it autonomously shoot out and circle your house with a continuously streaming camera feed all day, until night where it lands and waits for morning

    @DeSinc@DeSinc3 жыл бұрын
    • lol DeSinc here :D

      @user-ld9xb9nw7y@user-ld9xb9nw7y3 жыл бұрын
    • or you could just buy 4 cameras on the ground, with smaller solar panels, that don't need any maintenence. But having a plane circling your house sounds cooler.

      @bonkybonk_ow2793@bonkybonk_ow27933 жыл бұрын
    • Thas exactly what I was thinking. Fck who needs simpli safe when you got this drone circling your property sending you a live feed all day long

      @BMF604@BMF6043 жыл бұрын
    • @marietto2008 if you hide them they won't be.

      @bonkybonk_ow2793@bonkybonk_ow27933 жыл бұрын
    • I don't see this being more effective than normal security cameras, but it sounds much cooler, so i think it's a great idea. Also can't wait to see what you do with HL Alyx

      @kylegallagher5649@kylegallagher56493 жыл бұрын
  • As an aerospace engineer, most of what you said is actually pretty accurate. Reducing your aspect ratio will lead to more induced drag contributing to your drag coefficient, and as you go faster, "skin friction" drag increases with the square of velocity. At low speeds, the induced drag matters a lot because you need a relatively high angle of attack to maintain sufficient lift. As you speed up, your induced drag still exists, but the skin friction drag matters more because it is related to the square of velocity (a third component you did not mention was pressure drag, which also increases with the square of velocity, but since you have a pretty small cross-sectional area going into the wind, it should only be a small component of the drag). I think if you added some winglets, you could bring the induced drag you have down considerably and get a much more efficient plane. But sill, a very cool plane anyways. I'd love to see what else you make.

    @carlost.9233@carlost.92333 жыл бұрын
    • Ok teacher

      @cuhdi8964@cuhdi89642 жыл бұрын
    • Yes something like that

      @Catman666@Catman666 Жыл бұрын
    • where can i read up more about what you just said?

      @urmum8540@urmum8540 Жыл бұрын
    • Ate you a Brazilian??

      @tenhovergonha7692@tenhovergonha7692 Жыл бұрын
    • @@urmum8540 ur mum's

      @johndawson6057@johndawson6057 Жыл бұрын
  • "This is very dangerous" @ Kicks swollen battery yelling "blow up already"

    @ALucaRD807@ALucaRD8073 жыл бұрын
    • Tell me he picked it up and disposed of it properly after lobbing it across the field maan!

      @fatstripper88@fatstripper883 жыл бұрын
    • Nah, I'm sure he just left it in the field for the farmers mower to find it... If coarse he would have picked it up, this young fella is pretty good when it comes to the environment. He always picks up his crap, even other people's crap.

      @TheZombieSaints@TheZombieSaints2 ай бұрын
  • 14:40 "You'll probably need to be streaming in HD" Me: How dare you underestimate my neighbor's wifi.

    @IndraKurniawan-vk2qb@IndraKurniawan-vk2qb3 жыл бұрын
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣

      @hemanth3931@hemanth39313 жыл бұрын
    • Stolen comment

      @slate1496@slate14963 жыл бұрын
    • It’s true. I think I actually use my naighbors wifi, and if I do it’s super good.

      @Monkey_Mask@Monkey_Mask3 жыл бұрын
    • I was streaming in HD, but on my phone... Saw it on the left side just briefly.

      @tin2001@tin20013 жыл бұрын
    • @@slate1496 @Borko Could you be more specific? am I stole this comment from another comment on this video? No. Am I stole this from a random meme on the internet? you might be right, I use this meme template, to accurately describe my current situation for entertaining purposes, if you really think about it, everything is stolen, nothing original anymore, for example, your comment "stolen comment" I am sure there is another person already write that exact same thing down in the past, in another word are you stealing his/her comment? one last thing, Did you stole your profile picture from Tigen's Art on Tumblr without his permission? source from tigen.tumblr.com/image/179728069273 ?

      @IndraKurniawan-vk2qb@IndraKurniawan-vk2qb3 жыл бұрын
  • You need to do a long range flight with one of those !!!!!!

    @KonstantinosKnd@KonstantinosKnd3 жыл бұрын
    • yea, like around an island or something!!

      @anatoleh1@anatoleh13 жыл бұрын
    • I was thinking the same thing!! Straight-line range test into the wind and back. I'd love to see a test with 3/4G mobile link if that was possible. I think a range test would allow people to imagine the power of this thing better

      @joshmutch5249@joshmutch52493 жыл бұрын
    • Josh Mutch yeah that’s excactly what I was thinking! Have you seen those parrot mambo planes I think that are modified with lte and do like 50km flights this would be so cool

      @KonstantinosKnd@KonstantinosKnd3 жыл бұрын
    • Answer for long range feed 4G signal

      @digital0185@digital01853 жыл бұрын
    • @@anatoleh1 I was think around the world but whatever

      @davesomeone4059@davesomeone40593 жыл бұрын
  • So proud to see young folks with these amazing projects. The future is in good hands!

    @deltajjj@deltajjj3 жыл бұрын
    • you must have been hit on the head as a child.....................................................................

      @LifeLess1999@LifeLess19999 ай бұрын
  • rctestflight : "I'll be glad if I never have to fly a plane for 9 hours straight ever again, it's not a great use of your time." MS Flight Simulator player : "I don't get it..."

    @jiheljay2929@jiheljay29293 жыл бұрын
  • Le* Author " I am no aerospace engineer" 5 mins later.... Discussing plots of every type of drag and AR for wing and structural airframe trade-offs. Classic rctestflight

    @darshitdesai@darshitdesai3 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah, and he did discuss the plots like a not aerospace engineer indeed

      @piwpaw7363@piwpaw73633 жыл бұрын
    • Back in the day no-one was an aerospace engineer and no one plotted shit, there was no software, there wasn't even equations. It was all by feel.

      @whatilearnttoday5295@whatilearnttoday52953 жыл бұрын
    • @@whatilearnttoday5295 you don't need to get an engineering degree to become an engineer... All you need is curiosity...💯

      @arshaqek1475@arshaqek14752 жыл бұрын
    • @@arshaqek1475 Until someone dies.

      @whatilearnttoday5295@whatilearnttoday52952 жыл бұрын
    • I'm not an engineer but

      @gustavgnoettgen@gustavgnoettgen2 жыл бұрын
  • In the footage from directly above the field you can not only see the solar plane, but also the solar rover and the figure 8 it made in the grass. :D

    @domowysurvival@domowysurvival3 жыл бұрын
    • Well spotted!

      @ReverendTed@ReverendTed3 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks Daniel. I really love being able to tag along and vicariously have these RC adventures (even though they're probably way more boring while you're filming them!)!

    @RCwithAdam1@RCwithAdam13 жыл бұрын
  • Each time I watch your videos, I remember when I was a young teen in the late 90's early 2000's, I was practicing RC planes piloting as a hobby (I should say as a religion lol). With my friends we were tinkering and building amateur RC planes with scrap and propelled them with small 2-strokes engines, sometimes RC engines, sometimes stolen from strimmers or little chain saws XD. There were no GPS modules, nor there was any sort of gyro stab or even more any fps cam, wifi, or whatever. Flying a RC plane truly was a pain in the butt in those times. Amazing to see how far we've come from this era, with all the auto pilots, auto-stabilized drones, electronics modules, electric engines and all. This always amazes me.

    @fridaycaliforniaa236@fridaycaliforniaa236 Жыл бұрын
  • Brb gonna charge my battery *flies plane *

    @flakmag1004@flakmag10043 жыл бұрын
    • Lmao

      @dp4advanced234@dp4advanced2343 жыл бұрын
  • OMG a new solar plane video. YAAAY!!!!

    @MyProjectsTV@MyProjectsTV3 жыл бұрын
    • I too share your enthusiasm

      @nealbagai5388@nealbagai53883 жыл бұрын
    • nealynealster I too share your enthusiasm

      @dvorak826@dvorak8263 жыл бұрын
    • Bernal Boi I too share your enthusiasm

      @Minusliquid16@Minusliquid163 жыл бұрын
    • Irpan kalzz I too share your enthusiasm

      @gtxghost@gtxghost3 жыл бұрын
    • Ghost I too share your enthousiasm

      @brouettebredouille8320@brouettebredouille83203 жыл бұрын
  • Nice video dude, i've been highly impressed by such experiment of yours. Just recently planned to create and mount a solar powered water heating system for my summer shower (for any cloudy days), but for some reason i cannot engineer it. Those projects and channels like your seriously inspires people around the world such like me to learn a lot of new things. Good luck with this cute plane.

    @Virtual_Plaza@Virtual_Plaza3 жыл бұрын
  • That is SOME KINDA AWSOME!!! Well done, and kudos on the patience and endurance...you AND the plane. I experiment with new solar stuff, also. I'd be interested in the new solar film, mentioned by the OEM in comments. Keep flyin' (and keep yer girders up ...engineering talk). All the best...great vid !!!

    @douglasfuqua7082@douglasfuqua70823 жыл бұрын
  • Those panels are a really nice shade of blue

    @implodingbaby@implodingbaby3 жыл бұрын
    • @Pet your cats Yikes, talk about deduction.

      @JenkoRun@JenkoRun3 жыл бұрын
  • Hey Daniel, you should take a look on an "Active Balancer Board". It's a little and lightweight PCB that you can attach to a battery pack and it'll balance the cells automatically and more efficiently than a regular BMS. The BMS burns the excess of energy from the cells while the active balancer transfers the excess to the other cells. Also, you should be careful with the BMS because it will actually CUT THE POWER OFF when you overcharge and overdischarge the battery, which is not good when the battery is required to fly. What you need is a switch to disconnect the solar panels manually in the case of MPPT charger is not doing it's job. Your project is great, keep it up! You can do an "infinite flyer" for sure. That's the next step.

    @danarrib@danarrib3 жыл бұрын
    • You connect the solar panel wires to the charger input. When battery is full, bms disconnects the charger(solar). After some time when battery goes below threshold starts charging (solar).

      @sridvan@sridvan3 жыл бұрын
    • I think he has the chops to tackle that type of (very cool project) but as no one is bankrolling him) he has speculated that the cost (time money) is just too high.

      @fredricknietzsche7316@fredricknietzsche73163 жыл бұрын
    • Nice, hadn't heard of the active balancer. I'm using a BMS for the next flight, but bypassing it for discharge (ESC wired directly into the battery but the solar power passes through the BMS to prevent overcharging)

      @rctestflight@rctestflight3 жыл бұрын
    • An active balancing board sounds like an unnecessary optimization. His problem isn't balancing, its overvoltage, and while he should have some basic protection, the real problem lies in the rest of the power management system, because the charger should never overcharge the battery in the first place.

      @techobsessed1@techobsessed13 жыл бұрын
    • Tech Obsessed an active balance board weights 20 grams and costs 10 bucks... There's no reason to not use it.

      @danarrib@danarrib3 жыл бұрын
  • thanks for the videos Daniel. Always enjoy your ideas and your thought process. So much information and easy to understand and follow.

    @dannyweldon1389@dannyweldon13893 жыл бұрын
  • What a compelling use case for solar power. Seeing it replenish its own power constantly while in the air was simply magical.

    @Hamdad@Hamdad3 жыл бұрын
  • "I'm glad I won't have to fly a plane 9 hours straight ever again. Not a great use of your time." *Flight simulator 2020 exists*

    @SeanHodgins@SeanHodgins3 жыл бұрын
    • This would be reallt good fir search and rescue in the mountains

      @burntchickennugget191@burntchickennugget1913 жыл бұрын
    • @@burntchickennugget191 mountain winds thi

      @CarlosAM1@CarlosAM13 жыл бұрын
    • @@CarlosAM1 true but if the craft if large enough and slippery you could do it. Its not impossible.

      @burntchickennugget191@burntchickennugget1913 жыл бұрын
    • @@burntchickennugget191 yeah but still, gotta be careful

      @CarlosAM1@CarlosAM13 жыл бұрын
  • DUDE that super high birdseye shot was my favorite! such a cool perspective.

    @RossHasAdrone@RossHasAdrone3 жыл бұрын
  • BTW, good videos, ty. I enjoy seeing how you work through problems based upon you initial question(s) and actual testing regarding RC’s. On the topic of AE design efficiency, ... if the outer layers of the wings were constructed of a translucent material enabling and aerodynamically efficient built-in-curve, then the airflow disruption by the solar cell structures problem is negated.

    @Zeno2Day@Zeno2Day3 жыл бұрын
  • Great video as usual, I'm always looking forward to the next solar plane vid!

    @BlandTomtarOchTroll@BlandTomtarOchTroll3 жыл бұрын
  • Genuinely my favorite project on KZhead. Keep it up man, it's super interesting seeing the progress

    @clorophil1310@clorophil13103 жыл бұрын
  • Daniel, really like how you’ve done your homework here. Understanding that increasing the AR of a plane with constant weight, does not in all cases reduce induced drag is a key part of understand the total drag equation. I agree with your theory, although I would love to see the same aircraft (same weight and planform thus same wing-loading), with a larger span to see the increase in performance. I think you are on par with the average aerospace engineer. Good luck!

    @swimfpv1518@swimfpv15183 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for the safe battery disposal tips

    @TheIronSavior@TheIronSavior Жыл бұрын
  • for the wider thinner concept, you could make the wings foldable and detachable using keying or hinges. combine the panels using a branched quick connector . maybe also shield those wires around the compass or use already properly shielded wires that would cross that compass.

    @fuzziau5669@fuzziau5669 Жыл бұрын
  • The solar plane series is great, really enjoyed the sketches and explanations! :-)

    @leGringoo@leGringoo3 жыл бұрын
  • I'm not in the hobby but really love watching your videos for the iterative design and engineering involved. Thanks for making cool shit and putting it on the internet for the rest of us to enjoy!

    @Sharklops@Sharklops3 жыл бұрын
    • Did you try rc plane use rain

      @rolandobolias834@rolandobolias834 Жыл бұрын
  • I have zero RC experience but I am fascinated by your solar and autopilot videos. It'd be really neat to see as a next step in a series like this to have a plane fly around all day and have a camera track you as you move around. The applications for this could be for something like hands-free aerial footage of you dirtbiking or even playing airsoft if you could get it to stream the video to an Ipad. Whatever you choose to do, I guarantee I'll continue to watch it bc I love your content!

    @joshpaslawski1221@joshpaslawski12213 жыл бұрын
  • I just found my new FAVORITE channel! Usually it takes several videos for me to say that but this was enough to hook me!

    @deebo3864@deebo3864 Жыл бұрын
  • Fun, engaging and super-interesting technical topic - as usual! 😁 Really appreciate sharing your *hours* in the field.

    @scottwood1143@scottwood11433 жыл бұрын
  • This is awesome! Ive been watching your channel since the OG days years ago!

    @robertcarpenter8441@robertcarpenter84413 жыл бұрын
  • I used to work at a thin film solar company where our primary target market was aerospace applications. Happy to talk with you about the concepts and how things work on large scale aircraft too. Conversation efficiency and packing factor becomes a big deal in relation to the design space.

    @wings2004@wings20043 жыл бұрын
    • What are the sizes that is available and how much does it cost?

      @Asa27-bd9lh@Asa27-bd9lh3 ай бұрын
    • @@Asa27-bd9lh that company closed years ago due to the Chinese owners defraud the employees.

      @wings2004@wings20043 ай бұрын
  • Love the solar plane serries, been following this progression for a while now.

    @tylerreeves8026@tylerreeves80263 жыл бұрын
  • Uses for this technology keep popping into my head. A small, quiet drone with huge loiter times. Intelligent enough for it to fly a course without human input. Be it to reach a point & circle or fly point to point. Fascinating video.

    @Aengus42@Aengus423 жыл бұрын
  • The video I've been waiting for ALL SUMMER

    @Fractured_Code@Fractured_Code3 жыл бұрын
  • great video glad youre still working hard on this project

    @AndyShell@AndyShell3 жыл бұрын
  • Great project, to my eye your wing is actually more of a delta wing which has a different aerodynamic characteristic relying on creating vortices to achieve lift rather than traditional wings where long slender is better as you mentioned

    @daviddavis4235@daviddavis42353 жыл бұрын
  • Fast to a new rctestflight vid nice!

    @enterthecosmos7769@enterthecosmos77693 жыл бұрын
  • The wing is very reminiscent of the B2 bomber wing... add a bit more span for more cells and lift...

    @sorryociffer@sorryociffer3 жыл бұрын
    • Solar B2

      @ariesleo7396@ariesleo73962 жыл бұрын
  • Nice work, over the years. Nicely done.

    @TimsDrones@TimsDrones3 жыл бұрын
  • id love to spend a day learning with someone like you this is an awesome video

    @noobrefinisher5443@noobrefinisher54433 жыл бұрын
  • The biggest Problem with HAPS (High Altitude Pseude Satelite) is the fact, that they fly really high (~20km). So the air is really thin which affects the lift generation and propulsion, hence the need for multiple propellers. This means those planes operate at quite a high lift coefficent resulting in a lot of induced draig. The only way to lower this drag is to have a long slim wing. As they are as light as possible, these planes are really elastic and can only safely operate in these hights where there's almost no wheater. A few were ripped apparat during ascent when they hit some turbulence (NASA Hale and Zephyr). I do not agree around 6:06, you increase your induced drag dramatically because your aspect ratio is lower. Also i think the graph you showed only applies for one plane. If the same plane flies faster, it has to operate at a lower lift coefficient and thus decreases induced drag. But i come to the same conclusion. Your plane workes well because it flies during the day. There it is more important to have enough surface area to power the propulsion. It can thrust through the increased drag. But anyways, thanks for those cool videos. I love to watch them.

    @SandFl0h@SandFl0h3 жыл бұрын
    • NASA's Helios was the solar flying wing that broke up from weather / turbulence, for those interested to read more.

      @Wingman4l7@Wingman4l73 жыл бұрын
    • Excellent

      @truescalefpv4089@truescalefpv40893 жыл бұрын
    • With my understanding, (At 6:06) if the aspect ratio is reduced, and the weight of the aircraft and airspeed is unchanged, then the lift-induced drag should stay the same. The wing will be producing the same amount of lift, so the lift-induced drag is not effected. Only the parasitic drag changes

      @rctestflight@rctestflight3 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@rctestflightIf you look at a wing, you have lower pressure on the top and higher pressure on the bottom. This pressure difference will try to equalize at the wing tip and forms the so call tip vortice. This is induced drag. If you had an indefinetly long wing, you had no induced drag. If you compare 2 wings with the same area, the wing with a lower aspect ratio will have a bigger vortice and thus have a higher induced drag. Here you can read more: www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/induced.html#:~:text=This%20additional%20force%20is%20called,the%20lift%20of%20the%20wing. I am not sure what happens to the parasitic drag though. I think it will stay the same (more or less).

      @SandFl0h@SandFl0h3 жыл бұрын
    • @@SandFl0h What you're saying is true if you reduce the aspect ratio but maintain the same wing area (by decreasing the wing span). In my example, the aspect ratio is reduced but the wing area is doubled. This results in a lower angle of attack and the pressure difference on the top and bottom of the wing stays the same. The wing is doing the same amount of lifting work, and therefore has the same amount of lift-induced drag. If the wing chord is doubled, the parasitic drag quadruples

      @rctestflight@rctestflight3 жыл бұрын
  • Could you also mount solar panels on the bottom of the wings to capture any reflected light from the ground (clouds for higher flying planes)? It would be interesting to see the effects over various surfaces and at various heights.

    @thebigrigtrucker7277@thebigrigtrucker72772 жыл бұрын
  • Love your videos keep up doing them! And this video was uploaded on my birthday

    @alexk3843@alexk38432 жыл бұрын
  • Very cool. Super impressive. Experiments like these lead to awesome future inventions.

    @merkridge8780@merkridge87803 жыл бұрын
  • Dude. Make a kit. Id buy it!

    @pegg00@pegg003 жыл бұрын
    • I'd buy 2!

      @ultrablazed9126@ultrablazed91263 жыл бұрын
    • He must!!!

      @truescalefpv4089@truescalefpv40893 жыл бұрын
    • I would buy it too

      @celtelf@celtelf3 жыл бұрын
    • "I'll take your entire stock"

      @viperregained69420@viperregained694203 жыл бұрын
    • Me too

      @JoeMama-me5wp@JoeMama-me5wp3 жыл бұрын
  • 7:14 oh cool a 747 dreamlifter! Lucky

    @superengie3062@superengie30623 жыл бұрын
  • I keep watching this over and over. I love it

    @Flare-gjggn@Flare-gjggn3 жыл бұрын
  • I've had your issue with the Genasun. They explained it quite complexly... It's more like this, the genasun is just a boost converter, which means when the battery is full, the mppt can still overcharge your battery is the voltage from your cells is higher than the battery voltage. It does not have an extra switch to enable overvoltage cutoff on the output. On Ali there is an mppt based on the lt8490, that is a feature-rich chippy with buckboost power stage, way more safe. Still get a bms though! :)

    @dvanleersum@dvanleersum3 жыл бұрын
    • The Genasun I'm using here is the buck version, not the GV Boost. Do you know of any good setup tutorials for the

      @rctestflight@rctestflight3 жыл бұрын
    • @@rctestflight oh really! Damn then they really don't have their stuff in order 😳 maybe also go for a 3.9V/cell instead of 4.2xcellcount. The Ali lt8490 unfortunately has little to no documentation. If you are willing to spend a little bit more get the DC2069A dev module, that will have a full manual for you to set it up. It is only set for a 12V lead acid cell, you'll have to change an smd resistor somewhere. It's not easy sorry... 😅

      @dvanleersum@dvanleersum3 жыл бұрын
  • 5:20 depending on where the plane works and how fast it can travel, it could maintain itself in an area of the planet that has more sunlight hours per day, like stayint in northern hemisphere in summer then southern hemisphere in summer

    @Edu_RJR@Edu_RJR3 жыл бұрын
    • I’m wondering about the quad-copter designs that can go vertical for fixed wing. Could it land at night on its own and take off the next day for a long range trip.

      @alanjones8573@alanjones85735 ай бұрын
  • Excellent work. I think you can have a high aspect ratio wing with a low complexity only if you fan fit sufficiently slim batteries along the wing to avoid concentrated mass. That way there won't be a central mass to be supported by the wing. This would probably be simpler on a larger model where you could have a thicker wing.

    @drawingboard82@drawingboard823 жыл бұрын
  • Well done mate. You made a working 100% eco friendly day plane. 🥳

    @thomaspayne2158@thomaspayne21583 жыл бұрын
  • Great video ! Since you're overcharging the battery you should test how high you can fly it by using the excess power to gain altitude !

    @alisioardiona727@alisioardiona7273 жыл бұрын
    • Great idea, may as well burn that excess energy hard :)

      @Franksey180@Franksey1803 жыл бұрын
  • Awesome aircraft. Being an Aerospace Engineer, I'd suggest a high aspect ratio wing but a straight wing configuration. Since this aircraft is travelling at low speeds, swept back won't generate as much lift as a straight wing would at same speeds. Also, swept back wings are generally used for aircraft that travel at higher speeds e.g passenger airliners. This is because at such speeds (mach 0.8), airflow over the wing surface easily accelerates to mach 1 (speed of sound) forming shockwaves. Therefore if you want to increase the efficiency of this aircraft model, go for a straight wing and if you really care about the induced drag throw in some winglets👍🏽

    @zakiabdinasiromar5434@zakiabdinasiromar5434 Жыл бұрын
    • A flying wing like this one needs a swept wing so it can be stable. The rear part of the wing acts as the "tail" and the front acts as the "wing".

      @tomfoolery2913@tomfoolery2913 Жыл бұрын
  • Wow, very cool--I'm interested in seeing what comes of it!

    @jschlumpberger2594@jschlumpberger25943 жыл бұрын
  • I actually back spaced to like this video, love this kind of research, brilliant.

    @seaham3d695@seaham3d6953 жыл бұрын
  • You should send it on a super-long long-distance waypoint mission next.

    @InvertFPV@InvertFPV3 жыл бұрын
    • I was just thinking that. Could probably make it 100-200 miles in a day

      @Boomtowndogs@Boomtowndogs3 жыл бұрын
    • It would make a great competition, like the 24 hours of Le Mans race. Each team would compete to travel a 1000 mile course or something. That'd be awesome!

      @joeteichert6821@joeteichert68213 жыл бұрын
  • 10:15 "The compass didn't seem to be working" Daniel, you know how it says "Bad Compass health" on the screen there? Yeah, it shouldn't be saying that while you're flying...😂😆 Really cool plane though. Impressive that it flies the entire day.

    @Vousie@Vousie3 жыл бұрын
  • Very inspirational! You are truly an aviation and planet saver pioneer. I was awed by your flight up the mountain. It was incredibly beautiful. You mentioned in the video how the flying wing had problems keeping to it's programmed path, having many deviations from the intended path. That is common with a flying wing. The Northrop YB49 flying wing did not make an accurate bombing platform because it had less than desirable yaw stability. This was solved by fly-by-wire on the B2. But short of going fly by wire, an idea to try to stabilize the flight path is to add more vertical stabilizer near the center line at the rear of the plane. I tried this experimenting with RealFlight9 and a Beechcraft Starship, improving it's yaw stability using the aircraft editor to increase the size of the center vertical stabilizer. Have you thought of using the Opterra as your next platform?

    @harolds1256@harolds12563 жыл бұрын
  • Nice video shot, well done, thank you for sharing it with us :)

    @Bianchi77@Bianchi778 ай бұрын
  • "Oh you just wait, past Daniel" hahahaha

    @daverips_@daverips_3 жыл бұрын
  • We need a V5. All in!

    @sebastiancardenasholik@sebastiancardenasholik3 жыл бұрын
  • REALLY impressive! Good job!

    @agrxdrowflow958@agrxdrowflow9583 жыл бұрын
  • i like how many of these videos there are where the rover is just simply vibing

    @aidenzorn8322@aidenzorn83223 жыл бұрын
  • 7:25 what the...

    @Mr30friends@Mr30friends3 жыл бұрын
    • same.

      @petermuller7687@petermuller76873 жыл бұрын
    • Maybe tmi.

      @scottwood1143@scottwood11433 жыл бұрын
    • @Pandacat 666 Ikr, it's so Mad Max :D

      @clonkex@clonkex3 жыл бұрын
    • Subaru Withoutback 😂

      @tin2001@tin20013 жыл бұрын
  • After a year of your every RC project its weight increase..... Because of hot glue😂😂

    @adityaagarwal6719@adityaagarwal67193 жыл бұрын
  • I love the deep nerdery on this channel, making the science accessible. I wonder if there might be something to coating the non-control surfaces on the top surface of a plane with a photovoltaic film like ASCA makes might help tip the scales back in favor of more efficient airframes, so that such a drone can continue lingering into the night with only occasional thrust. Of course with the FAA mandated altitude limits for drones, that’s going to be a limiting factor in terms of getting above cloud cover and turbulence.

    @TerraMagnus@TerraMagnus Жыл бұрын
  • Race The Sun vibes... loving the concept!

    @appc23@appc233 жыл бұрын
  • Next flight....9 hours in one direction following in the car!

    @plam600@plam6003 жыл бұрын
  • Can thermals be "generated" with a dark tarp, or some surface like dark pavement?

    @ericlotze7724@ericlotze77243 жыл бұрын
    • The surface would need to be very large to affect an RC plane. The effect of something like a tarp would only be noticeable a short distance above it and would soon dissipate. To have a large, coherent, updraft you need something huge like a parking lot or a field.

      @matthewforan6397@matthewforan63973 жыл бұрын
    • @@matthewforan6397 Can a "blacktop" parking lot, and some nearby trees/non-blacktop area work? That or street, then non-street?

      @ericlotze7724@ericlotze77243 жыл бұрын
    • @@ericlotze7724 Sure. It just depends on the size of things and how high up you want to fly. You need a large enough ground area that the updraft will not be completely dissipated at the altitude you want to fly. On the other hand, if the ground area is too large it will probably become unstable and split into multiple smaller drafts. It depends a lot on your local geography and weather conditions. A good trick is to watch for birds soaring on the thermals. Large ones like hawks and vultures love to fly circular patterns over good thermals so they don't have to work hard while they're searching for prey. These birds will reveal the best places and weather conditions to catch a solid updraft.

      @matthewforan6397@matthewforan63973 жыл бұрын
    • @@ericlotze7724 pretty sure i remember my glider instructor talking about how he could usually feel bits of lift coming from large parking lots, so yes

      @MegaFPVFlyer@MegaFPVFlyer3 жыл бұрын
  • Great job showing how possible this is

    @markegg7680@markegg7680 Жыл бұрын
  • So I'm watching this video for like the third time after 2 years, and what you said at 7:00 just made me realize you make a great point. I should totally build one of these.

    @ignasanchezl@ignasanchezl11 ай бұрын
  • That lipo gave me anxiety

    @MikeMan21070@MikeMan210703 жыл бұрын
  • I was wondering if there are any auto-thermal estimating/route planning software. ie automated use of thermals?

    @ericlotze7724@ericlotze77243 жыл бұрын
    • The biggest problem with auto thermals is that the best way to find them is visually. Thermals are primarily under clouds a moving visual target. Ridge lift can be guessed at via terrain maps but is less useful up high where ideally a long duration solar plane wants to spend its time.

      @nocare@nocare3 жыл бұрын
    • @@nocare Yeah i was thinking that would be the hardest part. Also does weather predictions/solar irradence + temp locally help data wise?

      @ericlotze7724@ericlotze77243 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@ericlotze7724 Well temp isnt so much of a concern as temp gradients. The problem with open air thermals is they are weak as the cooling effect is only due to altitude gain of the air. If you don't care then staying low and over dark colored ground slightly down wind will always produce thermal lift. Thus circling over a spot down wind of a good thermal sight will let you soar all day on them. Assuming your plane is light enough to work on such thermals. Still needs a bit of human planning and the code isnt quite already written but it wouldn't be hard. If you are thermalling in order to gain altitude and lower batt consumption with the goal of using the extra altitude for a night flight then they need to be strong enough to help lift you thousands of feet in the air. Only cloud thermals will do that reliably.

      @nocare@nocare3 жыл бұрын
    • @@nocare Another dumb question; can FLIR help, or no?

      @ericlotze7724@ericlotze77243 жыл бұрын
    • @@ericlotze7724 Yes im sure a good FLIR could I cant say for sure. The bigger problem would be getting a computer to recognize what it needs from the imagery to fly to a proper location. Thermal imagery is generally very short range without heavy and expensive magnification systems.

      @nocare@nocare3 жыл бұрын
  • Oh hell yes I've been waiting for this video!!

    @brsrc759@brsrc7593 жыл бұрын
  • Thats mental !! I didnt even knew it was possible.

    @markumoeder@markumoeder Жыл бұрын
  • Could be fun with mobile internet on-board, fly all day anywhere there's cell signal.

    @bardenegri21@bardenegri213 жыл бұрын
    • All the 'telemetry' that he gets back from the plane could be saved on a micro SD card, and the plane already has some kind of autonomous control. It seems to me that it wouldn't need a cell phone link at all. There is also LoRaWan that can communicate over long distances line of sight.

      @acmefixer1@acmefixer13 жыл бұрын
  • Could you build an "auto thermaling device" for sailplanes? I think this would be super awesome :D

    @instrumentenfreak@instrumentenfreak3 жыл бұрын
    • its called ardupilot

      @brucebaxter6923@brucebaxter69233 жыл бұрын
    • Ardusoar is already in the code so he could do that.

      @sUASNews@sUASNews3 жыл бұрын
  • This one hit close to home. I installed a modern Lipo in my motorcycle with a home built voltage regulator and rectifier, I used a similar solar based management system that was supposed to cut off charging on the top end and shut the battery off at a low end voltage. I ended up making several spicy pillows, luckily no fires.

    @chrislivengood7350@chrislivengood7350 Жыл бұрын
  • Great work love your videos!

    @adamward9310@adamward9310 Жыл бұрын
  • loved the sponsor skits XD

    @amk1108@amk11083 жыл бұрын
  • Let it fly at/with the sun and see how far it can go

    @Starfishtroopers@Starfishtroopers3 жыл бұрын
    • "At the Equator, under flat conditions (without obstructions like mountains), the Terminator Line moves at approximately 463 m/s." or 1030mph

      @gewizz2@gewizz23 жыл бұрын
    • @@gewizz2 Time to make a supersonic solar plane then.

      @55yxalaG@55yxalaG3 жыл бұрын
    • That basically the inverse of the story of "Into the night "

      @celtelf@celtelf3 жыл бұрын
  • They may be an alternative to using high aspect wings for an efficient solar plane. Look up the Vought V-173 and subsequent XF5U. They were able to use a very low aspect ratio wing without the drag penalty associated with it because they used large props with the tips rotating outward to cancel out the wing vortices. You could stack a lot of panels on a disc shaped wing body while maintaining a light weight and excellent airframe rigidity, and scale it up to just about any size you want without losing any of the benefits. It'd be easy to make and would have plenty of room for electronics. Also of note is that the pilots who flew the V-173 couldn't get it to stall no matter what they did. The only hurdles to overcome would be finding the right diameter prop to effectively cancel out the negative effects of the low aspect ratio wing, and dealing with a dynamic lift coefficient dependent on whether your props were spinning or not. The image of your plane with an extended chord to fit more panels might actually work well if you had two wingtip props instead of a single center prop.

    @Skinflaps_Meatslapper@Skinflaps_Meatslapper3 жыл бұрын
  • Went as we expected. Nice

    @ActualGenius@ActualGenius3 жыл бұрын
  • Dang... If only I could get flexible solar paneling (solar fabric?) for my paramotor... Could run the wires from the glider through the carabiners! One day.

    @BlackGryph0n@BlackGryph0n3 жыл бұрын
    • hi nice singer

      @mrhmachhh4896@mrhmachhh48963 жыл бұрын
    • Only four likes for 4.4 million followers. Sorry man

      @simple5813@simple58133 жыл бұрын
    • Solar efficiency is gonna have to come a long way for that, but an explicitly solar-powered human aircraft would be so awesome

      @tyrantstomper@tyrantstomper3 жыл бұрын
  • Try some long range bombing runs on north Korea and launch from south Korea, just an idea🤷‍♂️

    @saltydog8047@saltydog80473 жыл бұрын
  • You know what?, I watched this whole video. I enjoyed it, thank you for sharing

    @caturlifelive@caturlifelive3 жыл бұрын
  • Love the in-flight commercial.

    @Dubbelehalvezool@Dubbelehalvezool Жыл бұрын
  • I love that quick outro. :'D

    @eddyrashid7139@eddyrashid71393 жыл бұрын
  • Cool plane mate. Very nice.

    @micharogalewicz6249@micharogalewicz62493 жыл бұрын
  • yes, arduplane sets home position at arming location. if you want it somewhere else, you must tell it, or re-write the auto mission and select Yes to load set home coordinates

    @FPVREVIEWS@FPVREVIEWS2 жыл бұрын
  • Perfect for a Farmer to monitor their fields from their mobile phone. Obviously only on good days but who knows as the system progresses it could offer night time security as well. Love it.

    @helenlawson8426@helenlawson84263 жыл бұрын
  • Really great video. I guess one lesson I got out of this is to have some sort of Voltage limiting circuit that will kick in case the charging circuit fails for some reason.. .Odd, that it failed to protect the battery... Thanks for the video.

    @marcfruchtman9473@marcfruchtman9473 Жыл бұрын
  • Nice shot of the dreamlifter!

    @jolting@jolting Жыл бұрын
  • Really neat! You should program a flight path over your town next or something, maybe a patrol path.

    @NeoIsrafil@NeoIsrafil3 жыл бұрын
  • Wow, Big thanks for this video! specially the 14:46 view, it'S insane. Keep your good work!

    @francoishaha@francoishaha Жыл бұрын
  • I've had thoughts about doing a solar powered plane that can fly overnight, and you do indeed end up being limited by cell number requirement (your wing area ends up being a lot higher than you'd like for efficient cruise). Depending on your exact constraints, optimal aspect ratio given power, structure and efficiency tends to end up at a relatively low 8-12, wing area at nearly a square metre, and you end up carrying ~2kg of battery...

    @kitnaylor7267@kitnaylor72673 жыл бұрын
KZhead