Steven Spielberg Golden Globes Tribute

2009 ж. 18 Ақп.
35 481 Рет қаралды

Пікірлер
  • Every movie in this montage is incredible,especially the films he has directed.Cinema wouldn't be the same without him.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor114 жыл бұрын
  • it's wonderful to see all these movies in one clip and I really had tears in my eyes cause there were so many great movies he did....

    @Heirloom9@Heirloom914 жыл бұрын
  • So glad to see Empire of the Sun included here. It's a beautiful film and it's always been overlooked.

    @Logos87X@Logos87X12 жыл бұрын
  • This is so spiritual and emotional to watch.

    @rustywine7839@rustywine78394 жыл бұрын
  • You too, and thanks. I could talk about Spielberg for hours.

    @CitizenKANE2277@CitizenKANE227714 жыл бұрын
  • one of my all time Favorite Directors!!!:)

    @manofmystery26@manofmystery2613 жыл бұрын
  • God seriously imagine movies without him i just cant

    @sun131089@sun13108913 жыл бұрын
  • Steven Spielberg....sos el mejor....x siempre

    @Yuri134781@Yuri13478114 жыл бұрын
  • And something that always moves me is the masive respect that spielberg and scorsese have to each other.....SPIELBERG GAVE A SPEECH when Marty recive the AFI LIFETIME AWARD in 1997.....and this time Marty return the favor making this clip and adding his voicer over with those wonderful comments on spielbergs career!....

    @Gaston088able@Gaston088able11 жыл бұрын
  • They left off The Terminal. I LOVE that movie!

    @movieman82us@movieman82us13 жыл бұрын
  • I Love This!

    @WhosTheMorley@WhosTheMorley12 жыл бұрын
  • Spielberg made the best pictures ever. I just love ET and Indiana Jones. But Shindler List is a master piece, he is truly a genie..

    @inugome888@inugome88810 жыл бұрын
  • Yeah,I agree. Terminal was great,and very underated. Tom Hanks did a fantastic job in that. I wonder when Spielberg and Tom will collaborate again.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor112 жыл бұрын
  • I understand,and I am in no way criticizing Kubrick.But honestly,he gave it to Steven,which means it was his story to do what he wanted.However,the fact he took the project and left Stanley's stuff in there shows Steven certainly respected him.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor113 жыл бұрын
  • @NeoConnor1 I understand too. But Kubrick died before handing it over. It wasnt until after his death that the Kubrick estate requested spielberg to do it and gave him full control. He did the best he could have done, its just sad knowing things probably would have turned out completely different. Although the fact is they are two completely different guys. It is what it is...rip stanley.

    @pljfilm@pljfilm13 жыл бұрын
  • the shot at 1:23 absolutely gorgeous

    @theempire00@theempire0011 жыл бұрын
  • 1. ET 2. Schindlers List 3. Saving Private Ryan 4. Indiana Jones Series 5. Catch Me if You Can

    @zachedwards92@zachedwards9214 жыл бұрын
  • just amazing, they only have 10 seconds for Jaws, which would be the best film on the resume of most directors

    @Comictalent@Comictalent14 жыл бұрын
  • They left out Sugarland Express,Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom(they gave us the year,no actual footage),Always,Hook,The Lost World,and The Terminal.Understandable,for ther most part,as they are either films Spielberg wasn't happy with or they are as good as the films that were picked.However,leaving Sugarland out was stupid.It was highly acclaimed,and won a good number of awards.Saw it last weekend and really enjoyed it.Should have been in there.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor112 жыл бұрын
  • @NeoConnor1 the thing is though, kubrick never intended on directing AI. He was to produce it, and had originally conceived the idea, but wanted spielberg to do the picture. However, I was disappointed with the lack of credit that Spielberg gave to Kubrick. But overall its on okay film.

    @pljfilm@pljfilm13 жыл бұрын
  • Well they left out Gremlins, Goonies, American Tail, Innerspace, Land Before Time, Joe Vs the Volcano, Hook, Casper, Pinky and the Brain, Freakazoid, Deep Impact and so forth, but it did include Tiny Toons and Animaniacs.

    @hamursh@hamursh8 жыл бұрын
  • Schindler's List is his masterpiece

    @midnightmaniclk92@midnightmaniclk9212 жыл бұрын
  • 1. Schindler's List 2. Saving Private Ryan 3. Raiders of the Lost Ark 4. Minority Report 5. Catch Me If You Can

    @CitizenKANE2277@CitizenKANE227714 жыл бұрын
  • I don't understand why you guys are fighting over Cameron and Spielberg? Can't we just enjoy them both? Both of those guys are game changers.Spielberg,along with George Lucas,basically started the whole summer blockbuster craze,allowing Cameron to make films like Aliens,T2,and True Lies.Cameron has even said he was inspired by those films.I think Spielberg and Cameron are both great,in different ways(Spielberg has better characters,although Cameron's are great),but they both artists of cinema.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor112 жыл бұрын
  • 1. Saving Private Ryan 2. Schindler's List 3. Jaws 4. Raiders of the Lost Ark 5. E.T.

    @LizardDude42@LizardDude4214 жыл бұрын
  • I love The Color Purple. It is not in my top 5(that would be Schindler's List,Saving Private Ryan,Minority Report,Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade,and Jurassic Park),but Color Purple is at least in my Top 10.I have seen 23 of Spielberg's films(he s my favorite director),and the only two I really didn't like were 1941 and Temple of Doom.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor113 жыл бұрын
  • Lost world wasn't as classic as Jurassic Park, but a fun, fine sequel that would never each the quality of the original Hook was a sweet family film targeted at adults Always was a personal film of Spielberg 1941 was a stepping stone for Spielberg to try new things and he learnt from his mistakes, a funny insane film nonetheless. Indiana Jones 4 (JPLW) was no different to the other 3 films, Indy hasn't crown up we have and we have forgotten what made that series good in the first place.

    @theburningpancake@theburningpancake12 жыл бұрын
  • did they seriously mention his role in transformers but not mention gremlins?

    @pelamar121@pelamar12111 жыл бұрын
  • I thought he was trying to talk Steven into for years? I didn't know that.Interesting. I didn't know that. I still love A.I.,but I agree,it would have been very different if Kubrick had directed.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor113 жыл бұрын
  • And it's not like trying to compare someone like Michael Bay to Cameron or Spielberg. At least those two have more going for them than explosions.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor112 жыл бұрын
  • anyone know what the clip of movie right at the beginning of this is? right around 8 seconds.

    @pljfilm@pljfilm13 жыл бұрын
  • The Lost World was also left out. Always didn't get horrible reviews and wasn't a bad movie. 1941, while being a comedy, was actually quite good too, this did suffer bad reviews though. "Hook" wasn't on there either. Another good one, got bad reviews, but I know the kids absolutely LOVE it.

    @BrettenBailey@BrettenBailey11 жыл бұрын
  • @Eltoby17 Jurassic park The lost world?, Temple of Doom wasn't there 3.17, 1941, The Terminal, Hook. All missing in action

    @theburningpancake@theburningpancake12 жыл бұрын
  • @malows1234 ::YAWN:: What are your thoughts on the crisis in Japan?

    @LukeLovesRose@LukeLovesRose13 жыл бұрын
  • Indy 4 was just like Jurassic Park 2

    @theburningpancake@theburningpancake12 жыл бұрын
  • Any good critic can tell you Indy 4 is a good movie ( not great like the originals, but still good) just check out empires or roger eberts review of it.

    @cooperarthur3@cooperarthur310 жыл бұрын
    • Bobishere I doubt even Steven Spielberg likes that movie very much.

      @karlkarlos3545@karlkarlos35459 жыл бұрын
    • Karl Karlos True. He often admits that Indy 4 was only made at George Lucas' insistance, as he felt the series was perfect as a trilogy. Now he's making Indy 5 as an attempt to redeem the franchise.

      @NathanDrakeTheGreat@NathanDrakeTheGreat7 жыл бұрын
  • @pljfilm that isnt any movie that speilberg did.... it's just saying what jobs he has done.... unless u mean the very first movie they showed which was jaws. (but it was at like 28 seconds...?)

    @nuggetowow@nuggetowow13 жыл бұрын
  • Please music name on this video

    @user-gp1pc1qq5d@user-gp1pc1qq5d2 ай бұрын
  • @NeoConnor1 Well, its not that Spielberg fails. Its just that Kubrick had quite a bit more originally planned in the project, and no where through the credits besides, "for stanley" is he mentioned. He really did have quite a bit of information and prep done before he died. Im just saying. Both of them are genius,

    @pljfilm@pljfilm13 жыл бұрын
  • I take you probably haven't seen 1941. Most people think that was his worst. I don't entirely disagree with that,as it does rate near the bottom to me. BTW,have you ever seen a Stanley Kubrick film? A.I. was intended as a tribute to him,and probably why most people think it's weird.Kubrick and Spielberg had very different styles.I loved A.I.,though.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor113 жыл бұрын
  • @zoddman Yeah. They also left out The Terminal.

    @EarlyFilmmaker@EarlyFilmmaker13 жыл бұрын
  • 1941, Hook, Always and the terminal are not included!

    @tasoskaran@tasoskaran13 жыл бұрын
  • please add lincoln, tintin, war horse etc

    @zachedwards92@zachedwards9211 жыл бұрын
  • Yeah,I know that. But I don't see where Spielberg fails to give Kubrick enough credit.I mean,at the end of the credits,he did leave a dedication that said "For Stanley." Plus,Spielberg gave credit where it was due.I like the fact that all the sweet and sentimental moments actually came from Kubrick.It just doesn't sound like him.He was truly a genius.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor113 жыл бұрын
    • in reality those 'sweet sentimental' moments were only so on the surface

      @Casarzino@Casarzino Жыл бұрын
  • They left out Hook,too.I know he was dissatisfied with that one.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor114 жыл бұрын
  • Oh,really? Cool. I don't hate Kubrick,but I thought Spielberg did a great job on A.I. Still,Kubrick was a very visually-entralling director,and he would have done a fascinating take on A.I.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor113 жыл бұрын
  • @theburningpancake temple of doom was there.look closely

    @Eltoby17@Eltoby1712 жыл бұрын
  • it never was going to match the quality of the originals

    @theburningpancake@theburningpancake12 жыл бұрын
  • They also left the Goonies out (writer, executive)

    @tasoskaran@tasoskaran13 жыл бұрын
  • Meant to say aren't as good,but I think I made my point.

    @NeoConnor1@NeoConnor112 жыл бұрын
  • @malows1234 Seriously? How exactly did Jaws change Hollywood forever? All of the tactics in Jaws were used SOO much better in earlier Hitchcock films... like Psycho. So, please, enlighten me.

    @LukeLovesRose@LukeLovesRose13 жыл бұрын
  • @malows1234 Um, Spielberg didn't invent cinema or popular cinema or as you say, "blockbusters." Spielberg was simply following the same patterns of other successful film with Jaws. Gone With The Wind, The Sound of Music, The Godfather ring any bells?? The way Spielberg fanatics like yourself talk, you'd think Spielberg invented the close-up or something. LOL. I know why Cameron will be a game changer, whenever people wise up. Do you know specifically WHY Spielberg is?

    @LukeLovesRose@LukeLovesRose13 жыл бұрын
  • Where was Hook, 1941, Always, Temple of Doom, The Terminal? WTF

    @theburningpancake@theburningpancake12 жыл бұрын
  • where is Hook, Always, 1941

    @theburningpancake@theburningpancake12 жыл бұрын
  • THERE WAS NO TEMPLE OF DOOM! WTF

    @driftwood1408@driftwood140812 жыл бұрын
  • Where was Hook, 1941, Always, Temple of Doom? WTF

    @theburningpancake@theburningpancake12 жыл бұрын
  • Hey Transformers is awesome!!! ):/

    @AwsumessPrime14@AwsumessPrime1412 жыл бұрын
  • @malows1234 LOL. Do you even know what "cheesy" means? Explain why you think "I'm flying, Jack" is so cheesy. Oh, wait. You can't, because you don't know anything about Cameron or his skills as a writer/ director. Like every other hater out there, you're just desperate for anything to trash the image of Cameron or his masterpieces. Anyway, Spielberg has made some great movies, that is true. BUT, he is not on the same, game-changing level that Cameron's on.

    @LukeLovesRose@LukeLovesRose13 жыл бұрын
  • @malows1234 You're trying to get out of answering my questions. That means you don't have an answer. That means you're not worth my time.

    @LukeLovesRose@LukeLovesRose13 жыл бұрын
  • @NeoConnor1 They shouldn't have left out The Terminal either. I don't care what anyone says. I love that movie and think it's probably his most underrated movie.

    @movieman82us@movieman82us12 жыл бұрын
  • @malows1234 LOL. Ok. I may have been a little harsh when I attacked Spielberg. Your attack on my opinion of Cameron almost makes you look insane, malows1234. It's my opinion. You have no right attack me or my opinion in such an immature way. Do you even know what makes great screenwriting versus bad screenwriting? I doubt it. Why don't you watch Titanic and Avatar again when you grow up?! And, I really wish I hadn't attacked Spielberg so harshly.

    @LukeLovesRose@LukeLovesRose13 жыл бұрын
  • Come one!!!....those werent good films!....every filmaker has some flawed picture in their career....you are being to obvious in your fanatic spielberg love.....i will give you a list of the best works of spielberg and scorsese, because for me they are the 2 more important directors of the last 40 years....but both of them have made some "bad" movies....they arent perfect!

    @Gaston088able@Gaston088able11 жыл бұрын
  • Pretentious film snobs always give awards and accolades to undeserving filmmakers. You know how long it took for Alfred Hitchcock to get his lifetime achievement awards? You know that he never won the best director Oscar right? So, I think its funny how much hate is given to the true master today (James Cameron) and how much love is going to the Frank Capras of today (Spielberg, Scorsese, etc). I just think its hypocritical to attack Cameron for anything after Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

    @LukeLovesRose@LukeLovesRose13 жыл бұрын
  • YOU REALLY THINK THAT THE LOST WORLD, HOOK, ALWAYS, 1942, THE TERMINAL, INDIANA JONES 4, ARE GOOD FILMS?????....SPILEBERG IS GREAT, BUT EVERY FILMAKERS SOMETIMES MAKE A BAD FILM....AND THATS WHAT THOSE ONES ARE!

    @Gaston088able@Gaston088able12 жыл бұрын
KZhead