The greenhouse gas no one is talking about

2024 ж. 20 Мам.
131 786 Рет қаралды

You may know laughing gas from your visit to the dentist. But did you know that it's actually a climate killer - 300 times as potent as CO₂? Why is no one talking about it? And how can we to stop it?
#PlanetA #nitrousoxide #greenhousegases
We're destroying our environment at an alarming rate. But it doesn't need to be this way. Our new channel Planet A explores the shift towards an eco-friendly world - and challenges our ideas about what dealing with climate change means. We look at the big and the small: What we can do and how the system needs to change. Every Friday we'll take a truly global look at how to get us out of this mess.
Credits:
Reporter: Anna Carthaus
Camera: Neven Hillebrands
Video Editor: Neven Hillebrands
Supervising Editor: Malte Rohwer-Kahlmann
Interviewees:
Eric Davidson, environmental scientist, University of Maryland
David Kanter, researcher, New York University
Caroline Orr, microbiologist, Teesside University
Steven Hall, environmental scientist, Iowa State University
Read More:
"A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks"
www.nature.com/articles/s4158...
"Urgent abatement of industrial sources of nitrous oxide"
www.nature.com/articles/s4155...
"Stanford expert explains why laughing gas is a growing climate problem"
news.stanford.edu/2020/10/07/...
"The world's forgotten greenhouse gas"
www.bbc.com/future/article/20...
Nitrous oxide emissions 300 times more powerful than CO₂
theconversation.com/new-resea...
"Laughing Gas Is No Joke: The Forgotten Greenhouse Gas"
www.eesi.org/articles/view/la...
Chapters:
00:00 Intro
01:07 History
01:59 Why is N2O so bad?
03:21 Why do N2O levels keep rising?
07:11 Solutions
09:53 What needs to happen on a political level?

Пікірлер
  • "Laughing gas parties" reminds me of the 18th century electricity parties where people would all hold hands and get collectively shocked on purpose.

    @michaelobrien5891@michaelobrien58918 ай бұрын
    • Or huffing ether 😬

      @magesalmanac6424@magesalmanac64248 ай бұрын
    • @@magesalmanac6424 I haven't heard of that one! I wonder how often people caught on fire. 😳

      @michaelobrien5891@michaelobrien58918 ай бұрын
    • Electric shock: We did that in school one day :D 15 years ago? Someone was doing a talk about electric fence power supplies and brought one, so during the break, we formed a big circle and got shocked. It was fun :) I really need to find that video again...

      @nos9784@nos97848 ай бұрын
    • Damn you must be old

      @c87kim@c87kim8 ай бұрын
    • N2O is so much better. They are called whippets and people still do have parties but that isn't the purpose of the party.

      @ryanreedgibson@ryanreedgibson7 ай бұрын
  • Regenerative agriculture must be taken in consideration. There are many regenerative farmers that don't use any chemical fertilizer at all and have the same or even greater yields. Gabe Brown is one of them: he's running his farm in regenerative way since 1995. Take a look, please ✌️

    @simoneravazza5451@simoneravazza54518 ай бұрын
    • Absolutely! Regenerative agriculture is great answer not only for reduction of nitrous oxide 👍I ad: more plant based diet = reduce animal products.

      @petrlonsky2332@petrlonsky23328 ай бұрын
    • @@petrlonsky2332 Little problem. Check out Project Drawdown, one of the main repositories of ways to address GHG. If you add up all the animal-involved agricultural solutions, animal ranching could actually absorb the whole annual emission of green house gasses and then some, per year. Reduce animal consumption TOO much and you reduce the economic viability of an area of agriculture that could literally SOLVE the problem.

      @lrwerewolf@lrwerewolf8 ай бұрын
    • I especially like what I learned from Living Web Farms' KZhead videos about how to treat your farm like an ecosystem hosted by Gabe Brown.

      @stevenmayhew3944@stevenmayhew39448 ай бұрын
    • It does not look much, but is honest work.

      @youkofoxy@youkofoxy8 ай бұрын
    • Plant based diets are causing this problem, animal based regenerative agriculture is the solution. Plant based diets are the primary reason for many of the worlds problems, eg, the loss of insects world wide is due to the use of herbicides and insecticides. Tens of billions of small animals (eg mice, rabbits,) are killed each year by farmers to protect crops and vegans eating these crops then illogically rant about the killing of a much smaller number of cows/sheep to feed non-vegans. @@petrlonsky2332

      @tonygorman9462@tonygorman94628 ай бұрын
  • I’m not surprised the agriculture industry is the biggest contributor to nitrous oxide emissions. This is why supporting local farmers is a better option.

    @veggieboyultimate@veggieboyultimate8 ай бұрын
    • You are assuming that large agricultural producers are using fertilizer less efficiently and therefore producing more nitrous oxide than small local farms. That might not be the case

      @dennisenright9347@dennisenright93478 ай бұрын
    • Are local farmers guaranteed to use fertilizer in spring instead of fall?

      @ThomasBomb45@ThomasBomb458 ай бұрын
    • I agree, support local farmers using modern chemicals to maximize crop yields and improve our standard of living.

      @gregorymalchuk272@gregorymalchuk2728 ай бұрын
  • It's weird how the first few minutes of this seem to be a hitpiece on N2O as a party drug and then, and only then, pivot to the actual problem which is agricultural and industrial uses.

    @michaelhuntley6175@michaelhuntley61758 ай бұрын
    • A hit piece? If anything they were irresponsibly neutral on that spinal cord damaging, brain damaging stupid choice of a drug I don't know what kind of adults would care to defend it, other than those who use it

      @Unwanted_truth_@Unwanted_truth_8 ай бұрын
    • Its weird that you find that weird

      @elitepauper7400@elitepauper74008 ай бұрын
    • ​@@elitepauper7400 It's weird that you think it's weird that he finds it weird.

      @pamparanea@pamparanea8 ай бұрын
    • @@pamparanea It’s weird that you think it’s weird that he finds it weird that op thinks it’s weird.

      @thischannel4326@thischannel43268 ай бұрын
    • i agree, it's weird

      @salvito46@salvito468 ай бұрын
  • 11:19 "What do YOU think we should do?" What do I think? I think the media should stop perpetuating the view that non-experts should maintain firm opinions on very specialized, technical issues.

    @andrewj22@andrewj228 ай бұрын
    • Pop quiz: What is the number one greenhouse gas on earth? Hint: it wasn't mentioned on the list... That would be water vapor. It's 25 x as common as CO2, and 3 x as effective. It is the elephant in the room.

      @geraldfrost4710@geraldfrost47108 ай бұрын
    • @@geraldfrost4710 Get a university degree. It's worth it.

      @andrewj22@andrewj228 ай бұрын
    • @@andrewj22 Thanks for asking! My degree is in physics, from UCSB. Yours? I made a Planetary Air Conditioner, which ejects enough heat into space to prevent 250 tons of ice from melting per year. No moving parts, and it doesn't use electricity. I use it to cool my house. I've posted videos, and I've shown the math. The media tells us to eat the bugs to control the weather. If you did that, how many tons of ice would be saved? Please show your math. I'm not being sarcastic; the PAC I built is real. I would like to know how much methane emissions would be reduced by eliminating bovine flatulence, and how much one person's lack of contribution would actually help. As an aside, the animal with the highest CH4 emission is termites, both by total species production and when looking at a kg of termite biomass as compared to a kg of bovine biomass. The conversion of wood-pulp (lignin) to sugar by the bacteria in a termite's gut is the source. Go figure.

      @geraldfrost4710@geraldfrost47108 ай бұрын
  • I wonder if this is why gardening makes me so happy!

    @mollypenwhistle7918@mollypenwhistle79188 ай бұрын
  • Thanks for opening my eyes to this. At least the video looked at solutions that allow the major sources to continue. The only thing missing was how much extra do the slow-release nitrogen fertilisers cost. I know current times are tough with a high cost of living, but if the message is it adds 10cents to the cost of bread, but solves a big issue, then I'm definitely in. Alternatively, it could mean countries subsidising farmers to use the slow release fertilisers.

    @lawrenceheyman435@lawrenceheyman4358 ай бұрын
    • If you reduce the amount of dairy and meat you eat especially from ruminants, you are doing your part in reducing NO2. You can look it up online, see it's not bogus as most of the NO2 emissions come from the livestock industry. Bread is not a problem, animal products are much more land, water and fertilizer intensive than plant based ones.

      @catalina5382@catalina53828 ай бұрын
  • Don't forget that Nitrous Oxide also has medicinal purposes. It's widely used at dentist offices.

    @cyrilio@cyrilio8 ай бұрын
    • It was actually phased out of dentist offices in the first world countries in the 1980s. Mostly because you need an anaesthesiologist to administer it in a hospital setting.

      @beyondredemption8179@beyondredemption81798 ай бұрын
    • Also you can inject it into engines and make cars faster hehe

      @Fred_the_1996@Fred_the_19968 ай бұрын
    • It was mentioned.

      @notinterested8452@notinterested84528 ай бұрын
    • Hello, Texas Registered Dental Assistant here. We use N2O daily with almost every single patient we treat, in fact most if not all pediatric dentists use it. No hospital setting needed and I have been certified to administer this gas myself. It is very safe with proper use.

      @Magnum3144@Magnum31448 ай бұрын
    • @@Magnum3144 Guess it must be different in the UK then because they are only qualified to use local anaesthesia.

      @beyondredemption8179@beyondredemption81798 ай бұрын
  • I don't think i would do it as a drug but it is great at the dentist's. I had no idea it could come from soil and fertilizer. We need to use better agriculture practices

    @GoingtoHecq@GoingtoHecq8 ай бұрын
    • They banned OTC asthma inhalers causing me to have to go to hospital instead of spending $12 to fix it at home. Let's just say the environment took a hit as a result.

      @All2Skitzd@All2Skitzd8 ай бұрын
    • I believe that we will need in medicine for many decades to come but agriculture is an more important issue.

      @paxundpeace9970@paxundpeace99708 ай бұрын
    • Unbelievably addictive.

      @notinterested8452@notinterested84528 ай бұрын
    • Sadly in London, you see them all over the street... Young people tend to blow em in to balloons to get high and has left many people paralysed or in comas 💀 Big problem in the UK

      @obaid5616@obaid56167 ай бұрын
  • I wish that we could talk about the real impact of n2o... instead of using figures that are built to amplify the impact... why not compare it directly with something like CO2, or Methane? probably because the impact is minimal.. and inconsequential in comparison? ... Yeah... also hugely beneeficial, compared to the impacts? the n2o literally helps us to lock away other greenhouse gasses... This whole thing is so unnecessary.

    @sfract6833@sfract68338 ай бұрын
    • Hey there! It's the third most abundant greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide and methane and it traps heat way stronger than CO2.

      @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA8 ай бұрын
    • ​@@DWPlanetANope. It's the FOURTH greenhouse gas on earth, a far distant contributor compared to water vapor, which didn't even appear on your list.

      @geraldfrost4710@geraldfrost47108 ай бұрын
  • Informative video as always thanks a lot

    @dipendragahamagar2386@dipendragahamagar23868 ай бұрын
  • Oh no the nitrous mafia won’t like this😂😂😂

    @sethlogee@sethlogee8 ай бұрын
  • So you are saying most of the climate problems come from Dead Shows? Dang... my bad :D I am ALSO an advocate for this third greenhouse gas. I'll take care of it! Drop it on my doorstep and I will make sure it is disposed of

    @carpo719@carpo7198 ай бұрын
  • Great documentary as always.... thanks DW!

    @saranbhatia8809@saranbhatia88098 ай бұрын
  • ☠, the future of mankind

    @janklaas6885@janklaas68858 ай бұрын
  • What an underreported issue. I knew much off it before from my planetary health classes and some own reading on the subject still getting it explained again just shows hoe important it is. Still the Ozone layer is one of very few things that the mankind destroyed and help to regenerate.

    @paxundpeace9970@paxundpeace99708 ай бұрын
  • Less balloons guys. Come on.

    @oneandonlymoth@oneandonlymoth8 ай бұрын
  • 3:40 why did you interview a microbiologist whose speciality is not chemistry, when the topic is more closely related to chemistry and physics She doesn't even research about N2O

    @VR00100@VR001008 ай бұрын
  • If governments and industry won't do it we can. Stop over consumption.

    @somerandomfella@somerandomfella8 ай бұрын
    • Hey there! You could be interested in one of our recent videos talking about the concept of degrowth 👉 kzhead.info/sun/kpZrna-dloGCpp8/bejne.html

      @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA8 ай бұрын
    • You want people to stop eating? Sure, stop buying so many clothes and cars and flights, but this particular pollution is from food. There's only not much less you can consume.

      @andrewj22@andrewj228 ай бұрын
    • ​@@andrewj22 Or we stop producing and then throwing away so much food. Worldwide, around a third of all food is wasted. In the US, it’s about 40% of food, 54 billion kilograms (119 billion pounds, worth about $408 billion). Source: Feeding America - Food Waste and Food Rescue

      @mrsneeklamy@mrsneeklamy8 ай бұрын
  • Laughing gas needed in medicine. Eg: during labour

    @wilsonbethlehem3101@wilsonbethlehem31018 ай бұрын
  • What is the coating on the fertilizer made of that delays the release of the nitrogen? I hope it doesn’t contain plastic. 8:26

    @sheebanishat@sheebanishat8 ай бұрын
    • clay

      @JQ3B94@JQ3B947 ай бұрын
  • Didn't mention what the shiny bulbs are or what percentage of the global output comes from them or how fast that percentage has been growing for the past twenty years. NZ streets are covered in them, partly because we're not allowed to recycle the bulbs

    @markjoyce3172@markjoyce31728 ай бұрын
  • Working at Starbucks we would go through about 48 cannisters of nitrous oxide DAILY!

    @PeaceLoveUnityRespect@PeaceLoveUnityRespect8 ай бұрын
    • What did you use it for???

      @Fred_the_1996@Fred_the_19968 ай бұрын
    • @@Fred_the_1996 they use it for whipped cream.

      @MAGnetICus_Attractus@MAGnetICus_Attractus8 ай бұрын
  • Advocate for regenerative agriculture in the US farm bill!! They are deciding theses policies now in the US so reach out to your representatives if u are in the US ❤

    @magwheels1232@magwheels12328 ай бұрын
  • Going vegetarian/avoid beef helps a lot: less food needed (beef production Is far less efficient in producing useful calories to us than vegetables one) --> less fields needed --> less fertilizer needed

    @lorenzoortinoghini9773@lorenzoortinoghini97738 ай бұрын
    • Protein too, calories and protein

      @ltandrepants@ltandrepants8 ай бұрын
    • Modern industrial agriculture is the problem, all the worlds food demands could be met with 5-10% of the current land use. It has nothing to do with beef and everything to do with keeping the public ignorant to the source of the issues. Plenty of farmers around the world using all sorts of natural faming methods and using permaculture systems to properly manage their land. There's no secret that the people running them systems easily out produce the conventional brainwashed farmers that throw chemical fertilizers on their land and then cry about the cost of the pesticides they have to use to stop their weak crops from dying.

      @ottoflouer1750@ottoflouer17508 ай бұрын
    • This is where I have been saying for years this zeitgeist is wrong, Beef's main diet is grass, usually on non arable land, or land that doesn't get fertilised. Going vegetarian/vegan causes more of the synthetic fertilisers to be used. Of what we feed to them as grain it's 15% of the corn crop in USA, 9% beef and 6% to dairy, a lot of place around the world have their beef on pasture and they wouldn't see grain until the got to the yard. Nothing beats weather irrigated, self fertilised produce from non arable land that we barely put anything into. Over 100 years methane is 28 times worse than CO2, N2O is 298, there is only 5.6 times more methane in the atmosphere. Moving to a vegetarian diet, away from beef, would be the opposite advice I would give if we wanted to lower nitrogen emissions.

      @antonyjh1234@antonyjh12348 ай бұрын
  • 2:27 Dont forget to include water as a greenhouse gas.....97% worth to be more precise. Tonga Honga volcano injected massive amounts of water into the atmosphere and months later there is massive flooding and dam failures.

    @oakpoacher433@oakpoacher4338 ай бұрын
  • We need lots if oil, electricity and chemicals.

    @gregorycotter6461@gregorycotter64618 ай бұрын
  • at least we will die laughing.

    @mari-atonjalkanen9920@mari-atonjalkanen99208 ай бұрын
  • So fertilizer isn’t the problem. It’s that we overuse it. If half of it becomes no2 then why don’t we use half as much fertilizer so the crops use it and none is wasted to the soil. That would save farmers money in using less fertilizer and then less no2 emissions all while maintaining high crop yields.

    @xtev7222@xtev72228 ай бұрын
  • How do you tell this to governements and companies

    @stoodmuffinpersonal3144@stoodmuffinpersonal31448 ай бұрын
  • I never know this before. The Gov keeps telling people only the carbon footprint, CO2 emission. Watching from Bangkok.

    @natty2760@natty27608 ай бұрын
  • The quantity of nitrous oxide release in the environement as per said in the video is from agricultural source, a cans of nitrous oxide is nothing compare to the scale of agriculture!

    @digifomation@digifomation7 ай бұрын
  • @0:20 Is that David Attenborough?? Who made over 400 trips, traveled more than 2 million miles in an airplane? "save the world, from major damage." 🤣🤣😅

    @SjoerdSoundz@SjoerdSoundz7 ай бұрын
  • How much would it help if we had stricter regulation on selling laughing gas for parties etc? What percentage is recreational use vs farming use?

    @orjansunnerhagen867@orjansunnerhagen8677 ай бұрын
    • Hey there! The majority of nitrous oxide emissions come from agriculture in the US (about 80%), wastewater treatment (6%), transport (4%). So, having stricter regulations would not hurt but it would not solve the big problem.

      @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA7 ай бұрын
  • Good one. From india❤

    @dipinjose9848@dipinjose98488 ай бұрын
  • We just decommissioned our N2O pipes in system. Now instead of of a manifold with H cylinders, they now have to order smaller E cylinders.

    @AlleyTrashBoards@AlleyTrashBoards8 ай бұрын
  • This is how big oil fights alternative fuels. If nitrogen is worse than carbon, ammonia cannot dethrone hydrocarbons.

    @malachiteofmethuselah9713@malachiteofmethuselah97137 ай бұрын
  • Hey, love your videos and they help me to keep from falling into pessimistic thinking. If I may humbly suggest perhaps you guys could do a video on adobe and compressed earth blocks as a sustainable building material. Thanks once again for your amazing content.

    @slimlogic@slimlogic8 ай бұрын
    • I'd also love a deep dive video from them on mass timber buildings and the engineering that goes into them and why they should honestly be the way we build structures going forward. carbon sinks, rapid deployment, reduced construction crew size, fewer trips to the job site, the benefits are numerous.

      @Fenthule@Fenthule8 ай бұрын
    • I agree. I love mass timber as well. The more solutions and the more easily accessible for all is the way forward.

      @slimlogic@slimlogic8 ай бұрын
    • ​@@alanhat5252 I saw those buildings. They are so cool, and to withstand so much time and the elements is a testament to their construction.

      @slimlogic@slimlogic8 ай бұрын
    • there is so much info on this. No idea why people think this is the answer.

      @albex8484@albex84848 ай бұрын
    • ​@@alanhat5252I hope to see those some day. It still amazes me that there were living in very similar structures to ours today. Fascinating!

      @erinmac4750@erinmac47508 ай бұрын
  • Tell us about your experiences and if you knew about the climate impact of laughing gas?

    @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA8 ай бұрын
    • Never smelled laughing gas but after watching this video I don't think I will ever...😅

      @azharmukhi5894@azharmukhi58948 ай бұрын
    • Yes, I've known about N2O for decades. It is a fun high. The problem is the agricultural emissions, NOT dentists or partying teenagers.

      @incognitotorpedo42@incognitotorpedo428 ай бұрын
    • *You're* talking about it.

      @planetarysolidarity@planetarysolidarity8 ай бұрын
    • Never smelled it but i was in a car that sprayed and that shiiii hit harder than vtec

      @Fred_the_1996@Fred_the_19968 ай бұрын
  • “Why is no one talking about NO2” - Two separate of my classes literally talking abt NO2 today, guess I go to a good school🤷‍♂️

    @andrewvermey2366@andrewvermey23667 ай бұрын
  • 11:20 it’s not about what we think, it’s about what works. You can’t have an opinion about such a matter.

    @SchgurmTewehr@SchgurmTewehr8 ай бұрын
    • It is still a matter of opinion. SHOULD we stop climate change is not a question of objective fact. Science does not tell us what we SHOULD do, only what will happen if we make this or that choice. As Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder puts it, science does not tell us we should not urinate on high voltage wires, it tells us that urine is an excellent conductor.

      @lrwerewolf@lrwerewolf8 ай бұрын
    • The rub for me come is when people start acting like they are some kind of hero here to save the planet. Thats why they have to fixate on "its humans fault". Because what we really want is to stagnate the climate and dominate this planets environment so we can extend the rein of humans and the stuff we like. It is a 100% selfish thing. I am all on board for it. But you jave all these people out here pretending like they're some kind of hero here to save the day is kind of off putting.

      @kathleenrobertpogue6818@kathleenrobertpogue68188 ай бұрын
    • ​@@lrwerewolfStill science has the task to communicate that pissing on an conductor that is connected to a highvoltage is dangerours or at least educators in school or teaching the tread should do it as well as the media has a duty to inform us. They gone tell you too that listening to her S.H. is not great adwise. She doesn't know what she is talking about .

      @paxundpeace9970@paxundpeace99708 ай бұрын
  • Luckily we have discovered a nitrogen fixing corn which will lower fertilizer use by a ton if we figure out how to add that gene to regular everyday maize

    @fallencobra5197@fallencobra51978 ай бұрын
  • EPA needs to lock down Monroe, LA area gas sales also. Continually allowing unlicensed owners/operators/employees to buy or steal is a WORLDWIDE HARM. Imagine being downwind.

    @cmd4789@cmd47898 ай бұрын
  • DW conveniently just forgot: How to feed 8 billion people? 😅 Of course rich countries can afford it, but prohibit or reduce fertilizers will create a HUGE famine in the developing world. But, who cares in Europe, right? Watching this video, I can fell the smell of regulation to protect the Europe "way" of organic farming without fertilizers ... I just want to ask if Europe and the rich countries will provide technology and equipments to developing countries, or will export only new regulations that only some few very subsidesed farmers can get?

    @dxd42@dxd428 ай бұрын
  • We should, we must, we have to. We who? Great video but are all countries equally responsible for that? Which are the main polluters of the world? They have to be truly addressed, their companies!

    @Camilodigiorgi@Camilodigiorgi8 ай бұрын
    • Hey Camilo! You could be interested in our video on whether the rich countries should pay climate reparations. Check it out and let us know what you think 👉kzhead.info/sun/fquIprambJGHhZ8/bejne.html

      @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA8 ай бұрын
  • So if the majority comes from agriculture, guess I don’t need to quit my nangs.

    @thischannel4326@thischannel43268 ай бұрын
  • Laughing gas: It's no laughing matter.

    @tanithrosenbaum@tanithrosenbaum8 ай бұрын
  • They forgot to mention my favorite use for nitrous.... drag racing 😁

    @oscarp9336@oscarp93368 ай бұрын
    • Hell yeah brother

      @Fred_the_1996@Fred_the_19968 ай бұрын
  • I have friends who have recently found out they can buy tanks with EBT.

    @Brett_S_420@Brett_S_4208 ай бұрын
  • I used to get a box fairly often and it stopped my body from excepting b12 and my body lost motor control functions in my hands and feet almost immediately and was impossible to drive or walk around took year and a half to get back to normal I don’t touch it now stay safe shit needs to be banned

    @squirrelfart2298@squirrelfart22988 ай бұрын
  • Nice that Sam Bankman-Fried is in this video

    @alisahan9917@alisahan99178 ай бұрын
  • I use Nitrous Oxide as a oxygen displacer inside of jars when storing oxygen sensitive materials since it's a heavy gas. I could just vacuum seal the jars instead.

    @tonysolar284@tonysolar2847 ай бұрын
  • I'm still waiting for news: Thanks to human ingenuity, the following ecological problem has been solved:... So that at least 8 billion people can continue to live on the planet carefree in prosperity. 🙂🙂🙂🙂

    @mimikrya8794@mimikrya87948 ай бұрын
    • Remember that human ingenuity CREATED the problem in the first place. Do you really think whatever we do to solve THIS problem won't just create another just as big?

      @lrwerewolf@lrwerewolf8 ай бұрын
    • @@lrwerewolf I completely agree with you. But if you remove the irony from my comment, it reads: human OVERPOPULATION is the basic problem. And despite many stories, environmental problems are only piling up.

      @mimikrya8794@mimikrya87948 ай бұрын
    • Hey there! We did a video on the topic of overpopulation. Check it out and let us know what you think 👉 kzhead.info/sun/nrmFXdVvp6Z6imw/bejne.html

      @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA8 ай бұрын
    • ​@@mimikrya8794Still wrong overpopulation is not the problem over consumtion is mostly in many western cultures and to some relevant degree in asia.

      @paxundpeace9970@paxundpeace99708 ай бұрын
    • @@paxundpeace9970Those who consume more are numerically fewer, and those who consume less are numerically more. And the Earth has to bear them all. Ever since mankind emerged from the primitive community, there have always been and will always be consumers of one kind or another. And always, those who consume less, try (successfully or not) to get closer to those who consume more. I guess that's human nature. I admit that I STILL do not know about the reverse process.

      @mimikrya8794@mimikrya87948 ай бұрын
  • Water vapor?

    @Arthurjshurley@Arthurjshurley8 ай бұрын
  • It has a crucial medical purpose today. We are keeping it.

    @themightyangustma2753@themightyangustma27537 ай бұрын
    • they are talking about NO2 not N2O lol

      @electronium6378@electronium63787 ай бұрын
  • So N2O is natural gas Which is produced naturally in nature. Confused too because this is the first time hearing about this problem

    @yuliazni3389@yuliazni33898 ай бұрын
  • And still we can't undo weather change

    @ivanbarbosa81@ivanbarbosa818 ай бұрын
  • IMO just the whole concept of stopping the change of climate is beyond bizarre as thats what nature does, constantly changes and creates new challenges, and trying to stop that is like fighting gravity In other words GIMME GIMME GIMME

    @thatguy7683@thatguy76838 ай бұрын
  • Yep. And Ban SF6 switching gas.

    @Suburp212@Suburp2128 ай бұрын
  • There has been over 2,000 nuclear weapons litoff in our atmosphere in the past 75 years and you expect me to believe cars are the problem😂

    @nickbaugh2034@nickbaugh20348 ай бұрын
  • Air-conditioners don't use cfc's anymore.

    @user-fq7vs8dl5k@user-fq7vs8dl5k8 ай бұрын
    • yes? it was mentioned in the video

      @Fred_the_1996@Fred_the_19968 ай бұрын
  • Wow

    @norenguhs8619@norenguhs86198 ай бұрын
  • Me putting the notorious oxide in my car to save the planet🗿🗿🗿

    @georgeyordanov8317@georgeyordanov83178 ай бұрын
  • Brother's lost the double bond pieces

    @ferench1145@ferench11458 ай бұрын
  • It's also become a popular drug for kids in Eastern Europe.

    @EleonorG33@EleonorG338 ай бұрын
    • Yeah it ruined my brother turned him to stronger stuff and he went psychotic and useless

      @NineSeptims@NineSeptims8 ай бұрын
    • @@NineSeptims I am so sorry to hear that, I hope he finds a better path.

      @EleonorG33@EleonorG338 ай бұрын
  • 🎶Gi-gi, gi-gi, Giggle Cream. Wa wa, waa-wa wa wa, waa wa wa, wa wa *that’s the sound i love*🎶

    @Andrew-vj2ep@Andrew-vj2ep8 ай бұрын
  • Nitrogen oxides have been discussed big time in the last few years. Your title is a bit off.

    @fiskurtjorn7530@fiskurtjorn75307 ай бұрын
  • Ill simply manufacture it in my basment useing ammonium nitrate. You cant ban it because its so easily produced

    @prestonhanson501@prestonhanson5018 ай бұрын
    • Go ahead. But one day you’ll get some hefty fines or jail time lol

      @EvilNeuro@EvilNeuro8 ай бұрын
  • My arse is also a big player after a dish of chili.

    @SjoerdSoundz@SjoerdSoundz7 ай бұрын
  • This ia not the whole story . Farming has to become a mixed animal crop operation again, where artificial fertilizer isn't even needed There are lots of regenerative agricultural farms using this method. Please make some more documentaries about this. The current industrial farming methods are detrimental to the environment, the climate, and the social fabric of our societies.

    @sabine8419@sabine84198 ай бұрын
  • Heres an idea limit usage of private jets to help reduce greenhouse gases, or better not be at war , machines of war have no emissions controls, for reliability reasons, many countries fly large aircraft nearly 24 7 burning tons of fossil fuels.

    @JMPCARREPAIRS@JMPCARREPAIRS8 ай бұрын
    • Hey there! We did a video on rich people´s lifestyles on the planet. Check it out here 👉 kzhead.info/sun/g9qJnKeqlpiGhnk/bejne.html

      @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA8 ай бұрын
  • It's hard to care about emissions. Especially from people that blew up a methan pipeline under the ocean for the biggest methane release in god-knows-how-long

    @seanlanglois8620@seanlanglois86208 ай бұрын
    • DW is not a Russian news channel.

      @TheEsseboy@TheEsseboy8 ай бұрын
  • Hb we keep it in peoples mouths’ instead of leaking from open faucets

    @boi0330@boi03307 ай бұрын
  • We really are toast

    @EmeraldView@EmeraldView8 ай бұрын
  • I need NOS.

    @TheLaXandro@TheLaXandro8 ай бұрын
  • DW, make a video about nuclear power. Maybe if Germany stops burning coal and instead use the 0-CO2 emission nuclear power, we'll all be much better.

    @nangelov@nangelov8 ай бұрын
    • Hey there! We did a few videos on nuclear energy, check them out and let us know what you think: Germany´s nuclear exit 👉 kzhead.info/sun/mLuud7SXmHSljJ8/bejne.html Nuclear storage underground 👉 kzhead.info/sun/hKp-lJmKoqGqeX0/bejne.html Thorium nuclear energy 👉 kzhead.info/sun/ftFvm9WxoopvY2g/bejne.html Do we need nuclear to fight climate change 👉 kzhead.info/sun/bLxpYMWkaHipnYU/bejne.html

      @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA8 ай бұрын
  • Lets not look at the rockets punching holes and burning gas rite threw the atmosphere

    @kennethreffitt2051@kennethreffitt20517 ай бұрын
  • No more whippits!

    @lefeee8888@lefeee88887 ай бұрын
  • We are way past small ideas. How about far out ones. Thermoaccustic cooling. Vibrating water vapor in atmosphere to release heat and cool the planet.

    @josephtpg2205@josephtpg22058 ай бұрын
    • Water vapor also catches a lot of pollution. Not a terrible idea 😅

      @Google-Username@Google-Username8 ай бұрын
  • The thumbnail is wrong

    @Rodickjose@Rodickjose5 ай бұрын
  • Most potent greenhouse gas by far is water vapour.

    @davelowe1977@davelowe19777 ай бұрын
    • But not one we humans are directly adding too, which is why we are more concerned about those gases whose occurrence we can somehow influence. 💧🦾

      @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA7 ай бұрын
  • Do you think that someone studying microbes who doesn’t understand how the bacteria actually behave might influence how the bacteria behaves in lab setting. Wouldn’t bacteria behave more appropriately around a shamans microscope

    @williamhayes8864@williamhayes88648 ай бұрын
  • banning the stuff wont be easy to do because . 1. the hotrod community will be crying fowl because nox is a very cheap way to boost the performance of a car and there is no other alternative unless they want to use rocket fuel and/or racing fuel witch is restricted and carefully controlled. 2. the medical community as an anesthetic if we used anything else our medical bills would go up if we had to switch to something else. forget trying to capture nox for reuse like we can do with refrigerants after coming off the early days of covid we did not want to be around others out of fear of getting infected i doubt that nox can be decontaminated for reuse. 3. the food embellishment industry would have to raise the cost of whipped cream or redesign the dispenser to use other means to froth the product. the best solution is to build a ozone generator in a massive scale to replace the destroyed ozone. the real problem is there are still cfc based refrigeration units still in service even today so we would have to do another cash for clunkers program and extend it to non functioning units too in order to get all the cfc based systems out of service.

    @ejonesss@ejonesss8 ай бұрын
  • Wish someone would ban treehuggers 🙄

    @MadScientist267@MadScientist2678 ай бұрын
  • 4:17 this is the reason we should all go Carnivore 🙌

    @SonnyDarvishzadeh@SonnyDarvishzadeh8 ай бұрын
  • In terms of farming, the solution is simple: stop traditional archaic farming methods and move it all indoors, into the cities that largely need the food the most. Reduce transportation dramatically, use hydroponic vertical stacked systems run by AI and robots on green energy, using no pesticides and fractional amounts of fertilizers. Cut the need for tractors, and large produce processing plants. Reduce water used by 99% and grow up to 300x the yield in a single acre of space. These facilities already exist. It's time people realize that farming, which is among the planets OLDEST technologies, needs to be brought up to modern spec. Why are we still farming the way we did thousands of years ago???

    @Fenthule@Fenthule8 ай бұрын
    • Most likely because your method is absurdly expensive and only works for high value crops.

      @StreetcarHammock@StreetcarHammock8 ай бұрын
    • This is even worse, we don't need a grift technology like vertical farming, we need to recognize crops that work together and engage in urban food forests in your communities, like corn, beans, and squash (iirc), which supercharge eachother and fertilize the soil around them automatically.

      @halcyon9686@halcyon96868 ай бұрын
    • And when the power goes out, or some other input fails, your entire city starves to death?

      @dennisenright9347@dennisenright93478 ай бұрын
    • You do realize what you are describing is the same thing derisively referred to as factory farms.

      @dennisenright9347@dennisenright93478 ай бұрын
    • @@dennisenright9347 Well at least OP family can buy the food from poor country, and let them die , just look how much damage Ukraine war on poor country , while the rich European just fine .

      @anubizz3@anubizz38 ай бұрын
  • You know whats great, we love to fuck shit up & fix nothing & leave a paved path over everything that once was, & is now behind us, lets leave a tree or something like in the days of old… Just got me a thought i wanted to share.

    @LoganL17@LoganL178 ай бұрын
  • Suggest 1 n all look at an article in Smithsonian magazine , Dec 012 about isotopes in atmosphere studied by nasal, with former u 2 spyplanes burning jet fuel at extreme altitudes to study tge affects of Ch1o , chlorine monoxide which is never been discussed the scientist left me with impression100 worse than methane , n it's way up and that co2 takes decades to clear atmosphere n Meagan also ch1 o really bad so nitrous is rite up there also ,ch1o is wat causes eye n nose itching knew it well in 60s coming out of NYC in am the fumes would day low on the ground, my eyes would a ter n nose itch n run bad for all but asthmatics , also just learned why so many old folks died in 60s 70s , 80s of heart issues , it was from.all the lead in the gas since th early 20s the lead in the air killed em over decades , but they took out the lead n heart issues less , peole living older.

    @davidr.walters371@davidr.walters3717 ай бұрын
  • My gas is also colorless 😎

    @AggamenoT@AggamenoT8 ай бұрын
  • It's political issue because of which industries aren't putting nitrous oxide extractor!!????

    @abhayanand9585@abhayanand95858 ай бұрын
  • CO2 bottles?

    @jat1992jat1992@jat1992jat19927 ай бұрын
  • It still shoudn,t be banned

    @tomeklipinski4643@tomeklipinski46437 ай бұрын
  • Ok I will cut back my nitros oxide fun parties to just two per week to do my part of reducing emissions. I will not be able to convince my car that it needs to cut back tho.

    @kiwidiesel@kiwidiesel7 ай бұрын
  • Nitrous oxide is not Nitrogen Oxides, or NOx, that is released in combustion of fossil fuels. Nitrous oxide is an oxidizer that is used in drag racing and is consumed in the engine. Fossil fuel plants don’t use nitrous oxide, nor do they produce it. We need to focus on the real problems of climate change and misinformation is not going to help. If the arguments can be easily dismissed as untrue, the battles are lost even if they are otherwise valid.

    @harttdm@harttdm8 ай бұрын
    • Hey there! In the video we talk about nitrous oxide which is primarily emitted through agriculture, transportation, and waste management. It is also created when burning fossil fuels. Part of the nitrogen that is in the fuel and surrounding air gets oxidized and creates nitrous oxide emissions.

      @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA8 ай бұрын
    • @@DWPlanetA nitrous oxide isn't the same as the nitrogen injected into the soil for fertilizer. One thing I learned having aquariums is fish waste turns to nitrogen from ammonia. Farmers use anhydrous ammonia for fertilizer. To think the 19th amendment in the U.S. made using ethanol/methanol for motor fuel illegal.

      @MAGnetICus_Attractus@MAGnetICus_Attractus8 ай бұрын
  • Please stop N20

    @ProPlay86@ProPlay867 ай бұрын
  • Drug Labs nostalgie

    @cocotheix2664@cocotheix26648 ай бұрын
  • Why come up with a solution to N2O that is in sync with the current mode of production when we are over-producing and over-consuming everything, except common sense?

    @erwinjessealjas2826@erwinjessealjas28268 ай бұрын
    • Because we want to avoid mass famine - that and we want a solution that people would actually go along with instead of fighting about it.

      @jeffbenton6183@jeffbenton61838 ай бұрын
    • @@jeffbenton6183 Mass famine is happening as we speak, and it absolutely has nothing to do with agriculture technology or any other thing except the way we distribute our basic needs is broken by design - state-assisted capitalism. The rich are by law permitted to wring everyone else dry in order to feel good about themselves, to be superior. You want to avoid fighting? Why do you think N2O is still in use? The video said N2O was deliberately left out of the ban in Montreal. Someone, some diabolic group, FOUGHT for N2O to remain in production because it made them RICH - and that made them feel good!

      @erwinjessealjas2826@erwinjessealjas28268 ай бұрын
    • @@jeffbenton6183 "people" or did you mean "capitalists"? :D

      @MannIchFindKeinName@MannIchFindKeinName8 ай бұрын
    • Who gets to decide what is "overproduction" and "underproduction"? Free consumers, buyers, and farmers deciding on what to buy and how to manage their farms, or some government central economic planning bureaucrat???

      @gregorymalchuk272@gregorymalchuk2728 ай бұрын
    • @@gregorymalchuk272 The over-production is seen in the landfill we make. Metric tons of food are thrown away and frivolous items, as well. A government that is directly answerable to the people, a welfare organization essentially, merely facilitates the sharing of resources amongst independent federations, so as for each one of them to meet their realistic needs. In a state-capitalist system Need is based on greed, thus inhumane income inequalities is rendered insoluble.

      @erwinjessealjas2826@erwinjessealjas28268 ай бұрын
  • Regererativ Agriculture and PermaCultur !! just se what industifarming does : desserts, masive cemical outputs and pruduce that cuarse most of all of over desises. But farmers have grows what autorites and banks says to instal desies into os all..

    @gynterhansen@gynterhansen7 ай бұрын
    • 🥕🥕🥕 Did you check out our video on permaculture yet? If not, please watch it here 👉 kzhead.info/sun/fJSrgbKRhKmwmZE/bejne.html

      @DWPlanetA@DWPlanetA7 ай бұрын
  • Saving the world is not a laughing matter....

    @clarklight2918@clarklight29188 ай бұрын
  • 2:02 What's the actual value? 310 ppb? Parts per BILLION? Thats's 0,3 in a million - not even a single item. Could be one in three million parts. How does this HUGE ammount of heavier than air gas, could have SIGNIFICANT impact on planet climate?

    @shoutitallloud@shoutitallloud8 ай бұрын
KZhead