George Orwell's Political Views
An overview of George Orwell's political views, guided by his reflections on his own career.
If you want to support the channel, here are the best ways to do it:
1) Watch the full video
2) Subscribe if you haven't
3) Share with a friend
4) Support me with a small donation on Patreon: / rchapman
0:00 The Spanish Civil War
2:20 The Soviet Union
3:33 Truth And Politics
06:01 Totalitarianism
09:55 Democratic Socialism
13:50 Other Writing
Sources:
Books
Homage To Catalonia: George Orwell - amzn.to/3XKGb1u
Animal Farm: George Orwell - amzn.to/3kSeqFC
1984: George Orwell - amzn.to/3Y8yZfa
Essays And Other Writings
Why I Write - George Orwell
Looking Back On The Spanish War - George Orwell
Notes On Nationalism - George Orwell
The Lion And The Unicorn - George Orwell
Toward European Unity - George Orwell
Review By Orwell: The Road To Serfdom - George Orwell
Literature And Totalitarianism - George Orwell
The Prevention Of Literature - George Orwell
Politics And The English Language - George Orwell
Freedom Of The Press - George Orwell
Preface To The Ukrainian Edition Of Animal Farm - George Orwell
London Letter To Partisan Review December 1944 - George Orwell
Thoughts On The Common Toad - George Orwell
Pleasure Spots - George Orwell
The Moon Under Water - George Orwell
George Orwell saw the writing on the wall about totalitarianism. He tried to warn us but as usual we were too busy enjoying petty comforts to take notice. So much has changed since then, except that we are still too busy enjoying petty comforts to take notice.
I have been banging my head on a wall trying to warn my friends , but they dont seem to care.
Then things are the same.
@@patthewoodboy ...same here though a couple Are awake thanks to altMedia via internet -- truth: ther Are more of us than 'elites' but Most are too asleep,fearful, etc. Even so, come,Lord Jesus !! Rev.22:20
And what do you do when you do take notice? You see the absurdity of other slave societies but not your own.
@@isokabooks3758 You stand up to the marxists and the facists and don't let them take another step.
I read 1984 at school. It motivated me to read its 'partner' book, Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley. Both books came to my mind in 2020.
and now!!!
Me too! But not while in school. These books aren’t part of the curriculum where I live. But as a music teacher I had my students see videos of both novels. Why? To prove how musical lyrics can be used as propaganda to influence others without them even knowing it. And to show them the power music and artists have in order to make people think or “unthink” (thought manipulation).
I read 1984 back in High School. I did a lot of skimming and it didn't really take ahold of me. I read it again last year and I can only describe it as.....anxiety....it felt like anxiety....from beginning to end.
Exactly the same for myself High School in Wales 1973-78.
@@hah-vj7hc No, I fear it now. The far left thought police and one party elites in America are turning us into the USSA.
Reading 1984 was one of the first times I had actually questioned objective truth in the eyes of “if everyone says it true it is”
Perhaps you are referring to political or social orthodoxy as opposed to objective truth. It was objective truth that ,Orwell lamented, was missing from history
Orwell believed in an Objective truth, but that governement and party loyalty led us to accept a subjective truth if the obective truth contradicted our desires.
That's the absolute opposite of the case against objective truth. The leotarded "there is no truth" propagators would make you believe every subjective truth is as valid as the next one, so you'll end up believing in propaganda that way. Objective truth is such a fundamental and obvious thing that it pains me to even imagine how you leotards think. You were probably always bad at math, that's my conclusion.
'Atrocities are believed in or disbelieved in soley on grounds of political predilection', so true in recent Gaza-Israel war.
I would even argue Orwell was even somewhat of a philosopher. The part that I love most in 1984 is when O'Brien gives his speech to Winston about Power, I feel like a lot of Orwells actions and mindset came together and made since after that moment. The character of O'Brien arguing that the problem is Power, it has always been Power and it will always be Power. As long as humanity exists, there will be humans who seek Power over other humans in whatever form they can. Power takes many forms, such as money or guns, religions or political movements, and it will always be a part of human society. He criticizes the Nazis and the Soviets, saying that they spoke lies about "Utopias", and while the Party of Ingsoc/Big Brother does the same, it does not believe in its own lies. That the Nazis and Soviets believed that they were going to build a Utopia once the blood was finally spilled, they could not accept that what they truly wanted was Power. O'Brien argued that Big Brother is more successful than those "Totalitarians of the past", as the Party is capable of accepting that it wants Power. It doesn't want a Utopia, it doesn't dream of saving humanity, it just wants to bend humanity to its will. All this to say, Orwell is very obviously commenting on one of Humanities greatest problems that has been with us since our inception, and will likely follow us into our grave. There will always be people in Power, animals using more complicated toys to force other animals to do as they desire. The desire for Power will grow increasingly more subtle as we evolve. For me in that moment, 1984 ceased to be a political commentary and evolved into a commentary on human nature.
Well put.
Very well said. Power corrupts and to judge a man's character, give him power.
If you're going to boil all the problems and tensions down to one thing: 'power' hence you've reduced all the world's complexities down to a single word or concept, then you're always going to be very very confused about what is going on around you.
Well, I say B****R Xi Zhing Ping!
@@willnitschke I agree, and in the end the word becomes meaningless, as all words will without context or descriptions themselves of what is meant by the word used. The Power to decieve beats Power to inform anyway.
The same thing is happening now, here in the US and around the world. Lies have become truth. Last time this happened 60 million people died.
Welcome to OZ
a similar happening today would not surprise me at all!!!
Well Faucci made a decent dent with the China virus and “vaccines”
It happens all the time since the printing machine was invented. We can only try to reconstruct a very incomplete story bc we can’t objectively know what really happened. That’s why the best thing you can do is either not get information at all or get your information from many different conflicting sources and piece together a more nuanced narrative
80 million
'Writers might follow profit incentives and say what people want to hear rather than saying what they think is true". I have seen this happen with media in the US. Orwell was so prophetic.
How could Orwell not be awarded a Nobel prize for literature is beyond comprehension.
The Nobel committee is comprised of hard-left socialists; that is, people who lean toward totalitarianism. Hence, Al Gore's Nobel Prize (for having accomplished nothing), Barak Obama's Nobel Prize (for having accomplished nothing good), and Donald Trump being snubbed (though he brought the greatest peace to the Middle East that has ever been). Orwell was a socialist, but he was not the "right kind" of socialist.
Not so much when you really take the time to understand the implications of what he wrote. The Nobel prize is not apolitical, it just pretends
Because it wasn't very good writing, that's why. I've encountered sledgehammers which are more subtle than Orwell's pen.
The Nobel Prize is overrated but anyhow it's not given to dead people ever. And Orwell's masterpiece "1984" was only published months before his death.
@@jessl1934 subtlety should not be used when shouting a warning
I don't have much of anything to contribute here, I'd just like to say that I very much appreciate your work, Ryan. Thank you.
Rob, thanks for your appreciation of his work! The world needs more gratitude. It is good in and of itself.
Here here!
I agree.
Came down to say almost the same thing, word for word.
I felt that it was pretty sus how much socialists hates fascists. Turns out they were butthurt that fascists copied and twisted their ideology
1984 is a book that has haunted me since it was a set book (ie "forced" read) in English Literature class at my school in the early 1960's. Whilst I loved reading since I was 4 years old, I absolutely hated Eng Lit classes in school, the teacher trying to get us into the minds of authors was boring....until this book! I needed to understand what was going on in Orwell's head. I discovered Animal Farm a few years later and then I finally began to understand as the Cuban Missile Crisis was unfolding. I am neither English, American, Russian, European nor Chinese yet right now 1984 should be brought back to all of these countries, most especially the USA (as the so called most powerful) which is descending so fast into totalitarianism.
i wonder what was orwell's view on colonialism.
@@jmgonzales7701 The Age of Discovery would play over and over again if you to go back in time. Good question. What is your view on it?
@@jmgonzales7701 Hasn’t Western colonialism always been a series of capitalistic ventures?
Certainly has been toying with, and teetering on the cliff-edge of totalitarianism. In days, the pointer has shifted from one Florida man (“Loser is a hard word for me to say”), to one with less baggage, to be the New Great Leader of Cult-45.
@@Allan-mf1he As a Person who was colonized by 3 Major colonizers mainly Spain, USA and Japan. I am inclined to say that i view colonialism poorly, in short i hate it. Yes i do acknowledge there was some sort of benefits here and there but in totality it wasn't worth being buttfucked by colonizers. Mostly those who benefited were the colonizers and their descendants while the native populace carried the labor and did suffer a lot. The deaths and exploitation were just too much and certain cultures were wiped out because the colonizers thought it was inferior. Certain colonial mindset were also applied mainly by both Spain and America. The belief that eurocentric values and beauty were superior and i admit it is still found in our current societies.
1984 is probably the greatest work of fiction I've ever come across in my life. That book hits HARD! The scariest thing about it is that even though it was meant to be a warning, some people seem to think it's an instruction manual.
... and I'm not so sure it is fiction. It might have been originally, but looking around today, it's actually a plausible reality for the not-too-distant future.
@@ChristLink-Channeldystopian!
Evil peoples manual for control
The owners appreciated its ideas
Brave New World is a lot more accurate I think.
When I read Orwell 15 years ago, it was hard to understand how a society could let this stuff happen. Now it feels like a description of Canada.
It would have been hard to understand, if you didn't look at the examples of history and didn't understand basic human nature. People have not really changed in 45 thousand years, so same kind of stimuli is going to produce same kind of effects and our drives and imperatives are the same. I started my life in soviet union and when that craptastic monstrocity fell apart, I hoped to at least live out the rest of my days without the authoritarians getting back in charge, but I guess the damn technological advancements made their rise even faster this time. At least it's much more visible to everyone who cares to pay attention, thanx to the internet. Without it, we would still only get the same fluff pieces and fiction from the news media as in Orwell's time.
The USA is just a step behind you, Canada! We seem to be running to “catch up”!
What is happening in Canada that could resemble the societies described in Orwell's books in any way?
@@seb0rn739 Keep on working and doing what they're telling you my brave Boxer
@@hinmatow What is that supposed to mean?
The greatest importance of his work is in applying it's truths (or falsehoods) to what is happening today, and acting upon that. I read '1984' for the second time in 2019, and I then watched as 2020 and 2021 played out similar to that '1984' Orwellian dystopia. '1984' was a warning which few appear to have understood, and even fewer are willing to resist, but resist we must.
...Es wiederholt sich... Mitläufer!!! ...und dann?!!! Wir haben nichts davon gewusst....
1984 was an instruction manual ... didn't you know that? /sarc off ;-) Pardon the joke, John, but I've found that quoting Orwell to a dipstick has as much effect as telling the DMV you're in a hurry ...
@@yarrlegap6940 couldn't have said it better
George Orwell's book 1984 was a warning to all of us the government was fully aware of how history can repeat itself the government made history repeat itself by censoring history not teaching about Stalin and Hitler and the Civil War in Elementary and high school is done a disservice to All American citizens and all citizens of the world
If you look at how the book of Jasher portrays the Tower of Babel, there were to be three kings to rule the world, but then finally, one. It was only when the totalitarianism was nearly complete that people found the bravery to do anything about it.
In my opinion, there is simply no true understanding of Orwell’s work without reading Homage to Catalonia and, I would argue Down and Out in Paris and London. He was, at the heart, a humanist and his bitter experiences at th hands of those who consider others to be fodder for their own uses so defined his work. Like many of my generation, I read both 1984 and Animal Farm in High School. It wasn’t until a growing interest int eh Spanish Civil War that I read Homage to Catalonia. It catalyzed my feelings about socialism and its almost ruin at the hands of the Bolsheviks. From there, I went on to read every one of Orwell’s books. His earlier works were not overtly political, but his sense of what was wrong was clear, a good example of which in Burmese Days. To me, the truest thing he ever wrote was his observation (from Down and Out) that poverty was profitable as “it is easier to take pennies from the poor than pounds from the rich”. My own work experiences in finance have only reinforced my belief in this truth. I consider Orwell to be, perhaps, the most important writer of the 20th century.
Interesting comment. My dad made me read Burmese Days but I have not read Down and Out yet. Now I think I should read it because my dad was always going on about it. As for " it is easier to take pennies from the poor than pounds from the rich” - it seems so true. The poor are the targets of usury which is a word that seems to be absent in modern English, just like covet. I remember Voltaire said “The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor.” Voltaire was something else my dad often quoted to me. I miss my dad! Take care Peter.
@@NorthernGate777 Yes, the Capitalist countries have always "exploited the poor" but so has Communist Russia. Those Communist leaders, and their Oligarch suck-ups live in palaces and have ridiculously expensive yachts, are exploiting the masses, themselves.* Look at Nasty Pelosi and many of those Democraps in the US Congress, who have power to determine where our tax money is spent, who, themselves, have greatly benefited financially resulting from the expenditures they vote for. Those US communist leaders in BLM and other leftist organizations are living high on the hog from donations from deluded idiots! *Did you see a photo of that grossly obese Russian general that Putin sent to the Donbass? That sucker ate meals five times a day and lived in a huge estate house! These POSes never send their own kids to fight in Ukraine...they have to trick and threaten other Russian citizen's kids to "die for their Country (PUTIN and the Oligarchs)! I've listened to many telephone calls between Russian soldiers in the Donbass talking to loved ones back in Russia and it shows how much these soldiers, and their families, hate Putin for waging war in Ukraine! There are many KZhead videos that provide these conversations (translated to English).
well , Peter , sure he is , together with some others like Aldous Huxley - " Brave New World " , ,,, so much in many ways like our existence(es) here in the cities of Western Europe and all the rest of the 'Western' World ... - "How much longer for "Elon Tyrell" to 'shape-or-shorten' our well programmed 'lives' ???
I definitely agree that people should read his autobiographical novels to really get a feel for what kind of person he was. What really comes through in these books specifically is Orwell's almost obsessive objectivity, to the point that he constantly point out his own ignorance, incompetence, pettiness, cowardice etc. in various situations. Hell, he even helpfully tells the reader when he suspects that his own opinions may be biased for personal reasons. I can't imagine that many people who read Homage to Catalonia come away truly feeling that Orwell tries spin anything, no matter how much they might disagree with him politically.
@@magnusengeseth5060 - That;s a great observation and is one of the major reasons why I hold him in such high regard.
Thank you for this. I was feeling hopeless today when I looked around today and felt how divided we've all become, how inhuman all of this feels. Thanks for this.
Please know you are not alone, there are elements that want us to feel that way when in reality most of us are on the same wavelength.
Orwell was one of the most insightful and profound authors of the last few centuries. It is simply astounding how much of his insights can be seen in modern societies and countries around the world. Truly scary.
Although we feel divided, us in the comment section are not, we are all still part of humanity
We are living in an inhuman society administered and created by inhuman elements. You are correct to feel this way. The truth really is perceived as lie and deception portrayed as truth.
Orwell totally describes the Western world we live in today...bending truth/reality to fit a political agenda. Thank you, Ryan. You have a great talent for summarizing.
At least we have his books to warn us. When does the left go to far
I love Orwell but I think the one who deserves credit for predicting our modern society was a man way ahead of his time but far less known, Aldous Huxley. In "Brave New World," he described a world where overabundance of information and freedom enslaved the people rather than totalitarian restrictions. Orwell, witnessing what he did in the 20th Century, was completely right in assuming the trajectory we appeared to be taking (and many places took it). Huxley described the 21st Century though, well before its time.
@@craigpoer Ironic that the conservatives claim Orwell was on their side when in this video you clearly see his origins as a socialist. The left is not the side claiming some narcissistic, orange debauched playboy is some Christlike 'man of the people' when he openly rants like Saddam Hussein about killing political opponents.
@@craigpoer i might be misunderstanding you but did you mot watch the video? Orwell was in support of democratic socialism. The far right loath with distain for anything not perfectly in line with their ideologies
@@craigpoerdid u even read and listen to him? Social democracy is the way to go
I had a very specific view of George Orwell because of the uses people put his work to (defending capitalism and rebuking anything remotely communist or socialist) but this video really changed my view on him and kind of showed me that I need to do my own research before coming to conclusions about people.
@Imperator Caesar Traianus Hadrianus Augustus Simply because socialism and communism arent the same thing
@@El_Jefe_Maestro Depends on your definitions of those words. "Communist" is often meant to mean "Revolutionary Socialist" and places like the Soviet Union saw themselves as Socialist implying that Communism will naturally come in the future. But because in the west the word "Socialist" largely means "Democratic Socialism" people see them as different things.
Good observation. Well stated. Ryan's got our backs, it seems.
"Open Societies and Its Enemies" by Popper is a more explicit argument against what I think Orwell was concerned with. There are parts of it which will probably sound too extreme/unfair if you're a modern leftist, but just remember it is giving one side of an argument which was very active at the time. Also related, in my mind, is the origin of the three arrows symbol. Look it up if you're unfamiliar. Anyways... The fight wasn't left vs right, it was liberalism vs authoritarianism. Thinking of it in left vs right terms misses the much more important (IMO) point. That point is also sadly highly relevant today. ETA: Authoritarian personality (followers) is also something well worth learning about. I liked Bob Altemeyers book "The Authoritarians", which is helpfully free online. Orwell definitely understood parts of it, but serious sociological work on it didn't really get going until the 50s and 60s. Totalitarianism arising from an authoritarian movement doesn't require the sort of intentional heavy hand Orwell appeared to think it does... The followers do most of the work of persuading themselves and the 'leaders' mostly just give the followers what they want (often authoritarian leaders are, or at least start as, amoral social manipulators more like an mega-chuch preacher or con-man than a true believer).
Funny how exposure to the truth is all it takes to break your conditioning. A little sunshine is the best disinfectant.
Wow! The totalitarianism that you speak of, people voluntarily censoring themselves and voluntarily conforming their beliefs to what their party tells them, sounds like today's plight. What's worse though, is government, social media, the news and press censoring people as well. It's truly scary. Thanks again for all of this informative content and you being non-biased. Which is a rarity today! I've been binging your channel the last couple of days.
Agreed. Paradoxically the more free speech there is, the more censorship will attempt to stifle it.
Having read 1984 on my bus ride to college, I became the view that each of us had to take care of our own interests. How prophetic that Orwell saw this so graphically!!
In 1974, my Dad was a serving soldier in the Intelligence Corps of the British Army. He was a Turkish speaker and was serving in Cyprus at the time Turkey invaded the island to protect the Turkish minority who were living there. One day he and his mates walked into a bar in Larnaca, a town on the south coast of the island. Also in the bar was a BBC news team, hammering the booze. After a while, the news reporter on the team peeled away from the bar and set up his recording equipment to record a "live" piece to tape which would be sent back to the UK on the next flight back. To my Dad's amazement the "reporter" started describing a non-existent street battle in Nicosia, which was then the capital. More pertinently, it was 35 miles and several hours on poor roads away on the central plain. The report was very descriptive and completely fictitious. When he had finished his fairy tale, the reporter returned to the bar and resumed his drinking. My Dad never believed a word from the BBC after that and nor have I. Nothing has changed.
Presstitutes
That’s disturbing
@@cabbey31 Not sure what you mean by "Haha". As a family, we were there prior to '74, my Dad was there throughout '74 and we returned as a family in '75. First tour, my Dad worked out of Episkopi (island-wide brief but nominally based in Episkopi) and we lived in a hiring in some suburb of Limassol. I was an infant and then a primary school kid so don't know exactly where we lived. I briefly attended both Berengaria Infants and Curium school. In our second tour, we lived in 44 Belmont Village, Dhekelia. Edit : 23rd. May 2023 : cabbey31 seems to have deleted his (?) disparaging comment so this response no longer makes sense.
The Ukraine war comes to mind. But not one person will question it. Hey it is on you tube and tic tock. So must be true.
@@dolandlydia Absolutely. It is "settled news" so beyond question!
Orwell's novel, 1984, is perhaps what I find to be an important book for everyone to read because he foresaw what was to come in technology in how societies would use telecommunication to deceive the persons of society.
Yeah, but he got one very crucial thing wrong: he thought it would require an apocalyptic event to give rise to Big Brother when all it took was capitalism and vanity.
@@shacktime apocalypse just means unveiling..
@@clayspigeon Don’t even start with that bullshit.
@@clayspigeon True, but you knew what s/he meant by using it with today's connotations
@shacktime Capitalism and vanity IS the apocalyptic event...Look at the ecology of the planet for a reference
It would be so interesting to see what George Orwell would think if he were alive today, immediately post covid, and so much of what he predicted (or warned against) coming true.
If he WERE alive. Honor him by observing the rules of Latin and English, which he learned at Eton.
@@user-xo8mr4hf4r 🙄
Perhaps his comments on the happenings throughout the United States of Europe as he had great hopes of it succeeding.
Um he lived through a pandemic. Spanish (started in the US) Flu. What you fail to realize is that the problems and issues are the same as 100-200-300-400-500 years ago. The only difference is technology.
I agree with Orwell and the Global elite trying to DESTROY AMERICANS LIVES
Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning, not as a blueprint!
I always think this, especially now that they have the Boston Dynamics robot dogs- as if they took Fahrenheit 451 as an instructional.
There be truth in that
I think theres a number of nations that would disagree
@@JimBob-jr5up Bet the elites dont though :)
@@TheSilmarillian meh. Im sure it varies, but theres for sure a good number of what you'd call "elites" who have either layed out the blueprints or are participating in, knowingly or unknowingly. For example the Clintons definitely know what theyre doing and the role they play. However the Trump's are so fuckin stupid, they have no idea what they are involved in.
I read 1984 when I was fifteen. Perhaps a little young considering some parts of the story. But it changed my life forever.
Read it again as an adult. I guarantee you that there is plenty that you have missed. 1984 was written in 1948. It was written during the second red scare. Orwell was at this time surveilled for being a potential communist sympathizer. His neighbors gossiped about him. Do you see any similarities yet?
Brilliant Work here with excellent citations from Orwell's writing... Thanks very much for making this video!
Funny how Orwell wrote about NPCs before there even were NPCs... Gramophone Mind is the perfect analogy for the pre PC-Gaming era.
Ghaye
I'd argue the opposite, it is the playable characters that are without mind as all their actions are based on the input of an external actor (the player), meanwhile N.P.C.'s are Autonomous and see themselves as actual beings. If you can think then you're the N.P.C.
@@-haclong2366 ...no... NPCs act and react solely on the basis of their programing. They don't "think".
That completely misses the point of the analogy though. NPC is used because, in video games, characters that aren’t controlled by the player follow a script that is much simpler that the human mind that controls the player character’s actions.
The player character is an NPC too during cutscenes, unless the game lets you move you own character during cutscenes
1984 and Animal Farm being two of my all time favorite novels, I would give almost anything to have met and known Eric Blair/George Orwell. He sounds like a Human Being after my own heart, only supremely more talented and eloquent.
I found 'Brave new world' was also an interesting read.
@@favesongslist ....but a lot less prophetic than Orwell's book. To me _Brave New World_ was really an attack on utilitarianism...on the idea that morals, legislation, or society should be built around increasing human happiness. It's like reading a modern-day Stoic satirizing the Epicureans for all he's worth, by imagining their Utopia and pointing out how awful it is. Orwell's books by contrast were portraying things he'd really seen, in pursuit of causes he'd believed in, and so it's depressing but not surprising that we meet more of his visions in reality. A less-remembered book in the same category is Henry Hazlitt's _Time Will Run Back_ . It's set in "Wonworld," a united earth after a Communist victory, and details a rediscovery of capitalism. Hazlitt was primarily an economic writer -- he's the author of _Economics in One Lesson_ -- and what he was really doing was turning Ludwig von Mises' _Socialism_ into a very readable story. (In the intro Hazlitt notes that he was writing independently of Orwell at about the same time, and that the parallels between them were caused by the logic of what they were portraying. For example, in Wonworld the old languages have been replaced by "Marxanto," with some of the features of Newspeak.)
@@josephw.1463 TY I will check Time Will Run Back out. Have a good day.
A Handmaid’s Tale and The Giver are two other classics besides Brave New World aforementioned above you’d enjoy if you’re into dystopian novels!
You may enjoy Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand.
Don't know what brought me to this, but I am so glad I viewed it. Definitely re-reading 1984. And definitely sharing this on my social media. Thinking people should listen and absorb what Orwell tried to convey.
It was the algorithms that brought you here 😊
Great video, thanks very much, Ryan Chapman. I like your style of narration and I really enjoyed being able to read Orwell's words as you were quoting them. Thanks also to all the commenters, and to the KZhead algorithm 🤗
I am amazed at how much of "1984" actually came true.
Memory holes, bugmen, all types of "ministries" lol, list goes on
1984 was an allegory of events that had already taken place. But it's taking place again, yes.
yes, modern day America really is like big brother.
Orwell was privy to long term planning by the governing elite.
Like what? Hardly any socialists [actually none] I know believe North Korea or China are some kinds of workers paradise. He is obviously right about the subtle totalitarian take over of North American & European semi-democracies (I say "semi" as they were never full democracies, in a full democracy the population would vote on economic matters as well as political ones).
These videos are like a warm cup of tea.
Rather a nice, bracing shot of Bourbon.
?
@@Glicksman1 ?
@@oldnatty61 Yes? What is your question?
Thank you for the bio-history lesson. I remember reading Animal Farm in the fifth grade and 1984 as a high school freshman. Their lessons have stayed with me. I see it today.
Yes it's everywhere. Almost prophetic levels and it's sad. We need to vote Trump to let him take on the powers at be before it is too late.
We read them too young, without reference. Should be read later when we have reference to actually see it in action.
69 likes
@@SamtheIrishexan you can't be serious lol
@@screenarts The teacher you have makes a difference. Each student writing a Character Analysis, then having an open discussion in the classroom was helpful to students in middle school by teaching the students about independent thoughts, observations and perspective without dismissing their opinions.
I always loved and appreciated Animal Farm and 1984 since I was young. But hearing his views on politics and humans in general, we would have been friends.
Catching up on your catalog now that I've "discovered" you. Your knack for piecing together a narration that is (by necessity) truncated while also being (through talent) surprisingly comprehensive, is admirable.
The single most important writer ……especially now ❤
i seriously recommend watching/reading a critique of him and his work. his arguments are… questionable at best. this video itself glorifies him far too much
@@John-qe6xx Like all of us Orwell has a lot of contradictions. Don't forget he was of a certain age when the British Empire was obviously on the way out. Today we have a load of intellectuals saying we should apologise and give compensation to all parts of the Empire. To me he is the greatest writer explaining why socialism is wrong when it is put into practice. no matter that he believed that it could somehow be made perfect.
I think Alice Miller is the most important writer... she explains why the fascist or totalitarian mindset develops in the first place... and does so in a highly emotionally intelligent way that allows each person to connect and recognize truths about their own childhood and their own functioning, and, if they allow themselves, to feel their pain and to heal. There are a lot of great writers, sure, and Orwell is very key in our century... but Miller is super relevant for all time. After all, this totalitarianism is just a deepening of the way we already live, and have lived for as long as civilization has existed - as civilization is an inherently fascistic, controlling, traumatized, and traumatizing way of life. (If you don’t think so, read Dr. Peter Gray’s article in Psychology Today, “How Hunter-Gatherers Maintained Their Egalitarian Ways,” for contrast. Register the difference between civilizations, which are always violent and hierarchical, and the “peaceful, egalitarian” inherent nature of hunter-gatherer groups. We denigrate them because they don’t use much technology - but don’t they have what truly matters?)
@@John-qe6xx agreed, also Franco was based
@@roginkWell this is just categorically wrong. There are plenty of socialist and communist countries which have succeeded, DESPITE major interventionist measures by capitalist countries and their allies. Whether or not you believe in capitalism or socialism, George Orwell didn’t explicitly say or imply that socialism doesn’t work when put in practice. He was anti-authoritarian for both right and left wing parties.
That was an excellent video!! The narration and delivery was superb!! And the analysis of George Orwell's writings was awesome 👌!! Thank you for your insight!! Very well done 👏!!
Thankyou for this video! I found it extremely interesting:)
Thank you for compiling all of these quotes together with the sources. I remember a good deal of them and have cited them when Orwell inevitably comes up in discussions about politics these days, but I had completely forgotten which pieces, outside of his novels, they were from.
When I was younger, and free of family responsibilities, I read voraciously. Orwell was one of those writers that had real intellectual punch.
‘As I Please’ ~George Orwell “SOMEWHERE or other-I think it is in the preface to Saint Joan-Bernard Shaw remarks that we are more gullible and superstitious today than we were in the Middle Ages, and as an example of modern credulity he cites the widespread belief that the earth is round. The average man, says Shaw, can advance not a single reason for thinking that the earth is round. He merely swallows this theory because there is something about it that appeals to the twentieth-century mentality. Now, Shaw is exaggerating, but there is something in what he says, and the question is worth following up, for the sake of the light it throws on modern knowledge. Just why do we believe that the earth is round? I am not speaking of the few thousand astronomers, geographers and so forth who could give ocular proof, or have a theoretical knowledge of the proof, but of the ordinary newspaper-reading citizen, such as you or me. As for the Flat Earth theory, I believe I could refute it. If you stand by the seashore on a clear day, you can see the masts and funnels of invisible ships passing along the horizons. This phenomenon can only be explained by assuming that the earth’s surface is curved. But it does not follow that the earth is spherical. Imagine another theory called the Oval Earth theory, which claims that the earth is shaped like an egg. What can I say against it? Against the Oval Earth man, the first card I can play is the analogy of the sun and moon. The Oval Earth man promptly answers that I don’t know, by my own observation, that those bodies are spherical. I only know that they are round, and they may perfectly well be flat discs. I have no answer to that one. Besides, he goes on, what reason have I for thinking that the earth must be the same shape as the sun and moon? I can’t answer that one either. My second card is the earth’s shadow: when cast on the moon during eclipses, it appears to be the shadow of a round object. But how do I know, demands the Oval Earth man, that eclipses of the moon are caused by the shadow of the earth? The answer is that I don’t know, but have taken this piece of information blindly from newspaper articles and science booklets. Defeated in the minor exchanges, I now play my queen of trumps: the opinion of the experts. The Astronomer Royal, who ought to know, tells me that the earth is round. The Oval Earth man covers the queen with his king. Have I tested the Astronomer Royal’s statement, and would I even know a way of testing it? Here I bring out my ace. Yes, I do know one test. The astronomers can foretell eclipses, and this suggests that their opinions about the solar system are pretty sound. I am therefore justified in accepting their say-so about the shape of the earth. If the Oval Earth man answers-what I believe is true-that the ancient Egyptians, who thought the sun goes round the earth, could also predict eclipses, then bang goes my ace. I have only one card left: navigation. People can sail ships round the world, and reach the places they aim at, by calculations which assume that the earth is spherical. I believe that finishes the Oval Earth man, though even then he may possibly have some kind of counter. It will be seen that my reasons for thinking that the earth is round are rather precarious ones. Yet this is an exceptionally elementary piece of information. On most other questions I should have to fall back on the expert much earlier, and would be less able to test his pronouncements. And much the greater part of our knowledge is at this level. It does not rest on reasoning or on experiment, but on authority. And how can it be otherwise, when the range of knowledge is so vast that the expert himself is an ignoramous as soon as he strays away from his own speciality? Most people, if asked to prove that the earth is round, would not even bother to produce the rather weak arguments I have outlined above. They would start off by saying that ’everyone knows’ the earth to be round, and if pressed further, would become angry. In a way Shaw is right. This is a credulous age, and the burden of knowledge which we now have to carry is partly responsible.”
I'm happy I found your channel. You produce some good stuff. Orwell denied being a Trotskyist. However, some have called him a literary Trotskyist.
Good video. Simple and clear, explaining the core of this author’s work. Sadly enough, you can now buy a t-shirt with the text ” Make Orwell fiction again”. The same old crap keeps coming back.
The frightening thing is that much of what Orwell said about the 'State' and people's willingness to follow it, continues to this day and has repeated many times throughput history!
What do you think about George Orwell working for the state as a colonial police officer then later in working for the real-world British version of the Ministry of Truth before finally ratting out fellow socialists to the British government in his infamous "list" for such egregious crimes as being "anti-white" or "possibly homosexual"?
@@SUPERTRANS2024-iy3qh He didn't rat out fellow socialists, he gave a shortlist of 38 people he thought unsuitable to have anything to do with the Labour government's anti-Soviet efforts in the IRD. It was a different time to now: one of the men who rejected 1984 for publication turned out to be a Soviet spy and went to prison for it, and the Queen's advisor, Anthony Blunt, admited he was a spy for Stalin. At the time, homosexuality was unlawful, and it was weaponised by the KGB (any spy agency, in fact) to blackmail people into giving them information. Many were concerned about harmful Stalinist interference in the post-war Labour government. It's likely Orwell didn't even know what the true function of the IRD was, because he certainly believed there should be no bans on communist party members. It's no secret he was a colonial police officer, nor is it a secret that the 1936-39 Spanish Civil War changed his views on democratic socialism which he became a staunch supporter of, thereafter. The reason he had to escape that war was because he was tipped off by his wife, when he returned from convalescence, that Stalin's goons were looking for him and he was on a list, so he had good reason to distrust Stalin's sympathisers.
And why did it repeat? Because it dies as well as it rises again.
It's a mental virus that spreads.
How do people follow the state?
I hated having to read 1984 in English class when I was in secondary school. You just gave me a whole new understanding and appreciation for the book and its author.😁
I think the BBC found some archive radio recordings more recently they certainly did a Radio 4 series featuring his life and work.. The fact that he experienced harsh conditions like those in The road to Wigan Pier and ended his writing days in a damp house in The Hebrides dying of TB.. typically of his time despite being shot in the throat he was a life long smoker.
Fair play. You should try Animal Farm in that case, it's much shorter and easier to read.
@@johnmichel4865 Its also available as an audio book.
What about listening to the 101ers? Joe Strummers pre Clash band. As for animal farm" I actually read 1984 voluntarily. All of his novels in effect.. The only novelist I had the stomach for. While Im fixated on ' A christmas carol'( especially Rich Littles) Dickens, by contrast, is a tough read. I sympathize there. Particularly David Copperfield. Even getting threw the talking book was an accomplishment. Im considering the pickwick papers next- the cartoon. Why not? Next to Alister Sims, Mr. McGoo made the best scrooge.
The only set book I read fully. Interesting how we develop. Now I'm an avid reader.
Orwell is the most under rated author. His down and out in Paris and London is both funny and heart breaking.
Yep! I expected 1984 to be this long and dry classic, instead it was written full of wit and easy to read
Are you kidding? He's the most overrated writer of the 20th century
@@gabrielethier2046 and you are the best writer in 20th century indeed 🙌
He is a rapist
@@resir9807 it's literally one of the most boring ass books I've ever read, and I've read a book on compiler architecture, for a CPU that doesn't exist IRL!
A truly great brief summary of Orwell’s thought, thanks.
It's truly criminal that you only have a few thousand subscribers. There's not many people whose videos I really look forward to this much. Always insightful, my dude.
Unfortunately when you absolutely destroy the logic behind CRT and Marxism in other videos, it doesn’t make you very popular.
Knowledge is always great when few people knows it...it makes us to feel superior...
@@JoeMun people won't accept even honest criticism now. The biggest problem I see in areas of social sciences is that their arguments are usually based on very simplistic premises which you're expected to accept, or refutations for which they provide no evidence. Eg Gender theory, just because something is a construct doesn't make it arbitrary and the reification of gender is insane.
@@painpeace3619 The real advantage of being able to discern truth from falsehood is the ability to interact with the world far more efficiently and effectively. How that happens to align with a simian pecking order is quite irrelevant.
these days you could probably get more views than him just by making reaction videos to all the videos and posting them on tiktok
I know this is a bit old but two things bear noting/correcting. 1) There is a surviving film record of Orwell from an interview with him shortly before he died while he was bedridden. I’ve seen it used in other KZhead documentaries about him. 2) A great deal of the influence on 1984 comes from James Burnham’s book The Managerial Revolution, which Orwell wrote a “debunking” review on and which is included by publishers of the book in current editions. The Managerial Revolution and the Professional Managerial State described within bears far more resemblance to the Oceania of 1984 than either fascist or communist governments, and is critical to understanding the work fully.
I have heard/read many commentators refer to Burnham's Managerial Revolution as the single best book for understanding economy, politics, and our world today. True?
Chomsky (very credible source, this is his area) on youtube says that the original introduction by Orwell had it that the book was intended as a crisiticsm of the Briish class system and the control of it by elite private school products. The publishers forced Orwell not to have it and change it to the one we know.
@@briancrowther3272 What does Orwell say?
Great presentation: Eric Blair is one of my favorite authors; he did live in perilous times, and saw reality through a prophet’s eyes. I had not heard before (or forgot) about his participation in the Spanish Civil War or his injury. I re-read 1984 (my father told me it had originally been titled ‘1948,’ but the publishers thought it too controversial); just as gripping as when I first read it at age 14 required reading as a freshman in High School.
Unfortunately the children of today will not be allowed to read his books in school as we were able to.
I wonder whether it is still recommended reading in schools today. I would be very suprised if it is. but the powers are very arrogant and think they can rub it in our faces and we won't notice.
Good information. I liked the insight into what shaped his thought process. Thank you. As we grow it would seem with constant and considerable effort we can wade through some of the most complicated subjects and bring a more nuanced understanding of our complicated existence
Apathy of conservatism is a interesting quote to finish on. Also a danger if unchecked. It would seems to be poking it's ugly head as a response to liberal extremism. A lot of finger pointing for sure
Another wonderful piece of content. Your specific focus and wonderful use of Orwell’s writings to provide a chain of evidence in this lecture are outstanding. Please do not stop. There are many of us who greatly appreciate you wonderful contributions. E Pluribus Unum
If anyone is wondering, most of the essay in this video is taken from the 1400-page collection of Orwell’s essays published by Everyman’s Library. I recommend everyone here to pick up a copy of that book. EDIT: Read also Christopher Hitchens’s book “Why Orwell Matters”, it’s a great assessment of Orwell’s entire body of work.
George Orwell is a clear answer why the modern society turns to today status: absurdity. Many intellectuals turned to socialism for answer while it is capital that made wealthy, made the world wealthy. Their grand father Adam Smith would be ashamed.
Ordering them both now.
We need to keep a few copies in a safe place just in case future generations need them, if we lose the fight that is coming they will need them.
Christopher Hitchens' thoughts were so overshadowed by his hatred for God so as to make them utterly worthless. He was consumed by a hatred for someone he didn't even believe existed. Today, he knows otherwise. Today Christopher Hitchens, when he is not thinking about the burning and the thirst and the consuming worms and the screaming and the utter darkness, can think about the utter foolishness of his previous earthly thoughts. It sucks to be him.
Based on my hastened research I identify w/ the first group of anyone's and I'm not wondering.
Very well researched and presented. Thanks for sharing
He predicted our current problems. He was so far ahead of his time.
A Lithuanian ambassador just asked me to ship him these books. He can’t find them in his own country.
Most leftists do
@@RealFemale69?
My personal avenue to Orwell began with Down and Out in Paris and London which began a 40 year admiration of his work. Orwell will always be synonymous with exposing the worst traits of humanity. The BBC4 documentary of his life is well worth watching.
Did you admire the antisemitism in Down and Out......?
@@geoffpoole483 Do you admire the ADL, I bet you do.
@@geoffpoole483TS BS TERMINOLOGY TO JUSTIFY UNJUSTIFIABLE ACTS WITHR DIFFUSION OF THE BLAME. Jews dont have a universal definition of what they are. Semites do most of the dying and other suffering caused by Jewish, US UK GERMAN SPANISH COLONIAL CORPORATE TOTALITARIAN LEANING FASCISTS. What a low brow cheap shot. No doubt you enjoy the fruits of such colonial criminals. No substance. No argument. No moral high ground. Bullies!
Down and Out in Paris and London--what always stayed with me was the "chef"...who blew his nose in the soup
@@geoffpoole483I don't remember that part.
thank you taking the time to make, produce, and upload these types of videos. you do amazing work!
Lovely speaking voice, easy to listen to. Very important when getting your message across.
Thanks, that was insightful. You just failed to mention Orwell's list, which I believe is paramount to understanding "what Orwell actually believed", especially towards his last years.
Ehh, whenever people mention what someone has done in the twilight years of their life, I don't think it's ever a real view as to who they used to be. I've seen grandparents that were renowned scientists and researchers become outright delusional. Nobody is immune from the inevitable loss of faculties from age.
@@DudesterGX Yeah, but whoever took 5 minutes to learn about Eric Blair's biography knows that he died very young. Unless you believe people in their forties have already lost their mental faculties from old age, but I doubt you do.
When I was at School Animal farm was one of the book's we read and discussed, Orwell rewrote it for the British Government. I personally think that Animal farm was more important than 1984 . 1984 is a symptom of Animal farm.
I like what you wrote there
Where did you get the idea he wrote Animal Farm for the British government? They had nothing to do with it.
@@ketmaniac when he wrote "for" I think he was refering to it as a warning for the british government
@@ketmaniac I never said he wrote Animal Farm for the British Government, I said he rewrote Animal farm with anti Russian leaning, because the British and US Government's had a fear that the World would be taken over by Comonisam,
@@patthewoodboy No he Rewrote for the British Government.
Just discovered your channel and subscribed. I like your approach of addressing things informatively and not with a biased intention. Keep up the good work!
What a brilliant and insightful man. His visions were current and futuristic.
Thanks for posting. Great piece of work.
Absolutely fascinating and worth the watch, thank you for creating this. As I'm reading 1984 currently, this has given me a clearer understanding of Orwell's themes and the message behind the book. Glad I stumbled on your channel- excellent work and thank you for sharing!
‘As I Please’ ~George Orwell “SOMEWHERE or other-I think it is in the preface to Saint Joan-Bernard Shaw remarks that we are more gullible and superstitious today than we were in the Middle Ages, and as an example of modern credulity he cites the widespread belief that the earth is round. The average man, says Shaw, can advance not a single reason for thinking that the earth is round. He merely swallows this theory because there is something about it that appeals to the twentieth-century mentality. Now, Shaw is exaggerating, but there is something in what he says, and the question is worth following up, for the sake of the light it throws on modern knowledge. Just why do we believe that the earth is round? I am not speaking of the few thousand astronomers, geographers and so forth who could give ocular proof, or have a theoretical knowledge of the proof, but of the ordinary newspaper-reading citizen, such as you or me. As for the Flat Earth theory, I believe I could refute it. If you stand by the seashore on a clear day, you can see the masts and funnels of invisible ships passing along the horizons. This phenomenon can only be explained by assuming that the earth’s surface is curved. But it does not follow that the earth is spherical. Imagine another theory called the Oval Earth theory, which claims that the earth is shaped like an egg. What can I say against it? Against the Oval Earth man, the first card I can play is the analogy of the sun and moon. The Oval Earth man promptly answers that I don’t know, by my own observation, that those bodies are spherical. I only know that they are round, and they may perfectly well be flat discs. I have no answer to that one. Besides, he goes on, what reason have I for thinking that the earth must be the same shape as the sun and moon? I can’t answer that one either. My second card is the earth’s shadow: when cast on the moon during eclipses, it appears to be the shadow of a round object. But how do I know, demands the Oval Earth man, that eclipses of the moon are caused by the shadow of the earth? The answer is that I don’t know, but have taken this piece of information blindly from newspaper articles and science booklets. Defeated in the minor exchanges, I now play my queen of trumps: the opinion of the experts. The Astronomer Royal, who ought to know, tells me that the earth is round. The Oval Earth man covers the queen with his king. Have I tested the Astronomer Royal’s statement, and would I even know a way of testing it? Here I bring out my ace. Yes, I do know one test. The astronomers can foretell eclipses, and this suggests that their opinions about the solar system are pretty sound. I am therefore justified in accepting their say-so about the shape of the earth. If the Oval Earth man answers-what I believe is true-that the ancient Egyptians, who thought the sun goes round the earth, could also predict eclipses, then bang goes my ace. I have only one card left: navigation. People can sail ships round the world, and reach the places they aim at, by calculations which assume that the earth is spherical. I believe that finishes the Oval Earth man, though even then he may possibly have some kind of counter. It will be seen that my reasons for thinking that the earth is round are rather precarious ones. Yet this is an exceptionally elementary piece of information. On most other questions I should have to fall back on the expert much earlier, and would be less able to test his pronouncements. And much the greater part of our knowledge is at this level. It does not rest on reasoning or on experiment, but on authority. And how can it be otherwise, when the range of knowledge is so vast that the expert himself is an ignoramous as soon as he strays away from his own speciality? Most people, if asked to prove that the earth is round, would not even bother to produce the rather weak arguments I have outlined above. They would start off by saying that ’everyone knows’ the earth to be round, and if pressed further, would become angry. In a way Shaw is right. This is a credulous age, and the burden of knowledge which we now have to carry is partly responsible.”
Excellent piece - I would just add that the turning point in his life, as I understand it, was described in his essay "Shooting the Elephant" - the moment of his disillusionment as a young colonial police officer in Burma. "The white man ... becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the conventional figure of a sahib ... he wears a mask and his face grows to fit it." It was this experience, I think, that led him to leave his commission, return to England, and change his name.
It's one of those moments that made him disillusioned with British colonialism and the idea of an Empire. A good second story on this is also "A Hanging" also set in Burma during his officer days.
Thank you !!!!
Loved this video. It helped me along my journey. Thank you.
1984 was required reading when I went to high school and it was beneficial. How much better and more informative the experience would have been if we had been able to watch this video first! Thanks for producing it. Wonderful stuff, Ryan. 👍
And it is not required reading now - or even mentioned. Consider that.
@@rossriver75yukon27 Of course they don't mention it. An educated public is more difficult to manipulate.
@@rossriver75yukon27 Thank fuck for that. It's crap.
@@geoffpoole483 In my top 5 books ever read. Why didn’t you like it?
I remembe falling asleep during that required reading.
Have to wonder what Orwell would say about social media and its role in spreading fiction as fact. I also think he would be alarmed at the cancel culture where a group think is being orchestrated by the man behind the curtain. To see this herd mentality is truly frightening to those who champion individualism despite its messiness.
I think social media is the biggest threat we face today, everyone has a common herd mentality no critical thinking and wants to fit in, people are being controlled without even knowing it - its bigger than facism the you must be PC, you are not free to believe as you want, your opinion doesn't count against the masses, who will shun you more than a religious religious group if you dis-agree , Example I cant say that Ukraine has been a militia nazi state for 14 years, its foundation has always been Kiev- Rus which began in the 9th century and that has had the same warring brothers history, or that Ukraine has never been a part of western Europe of course Russia is the aggressor but why is the US sending 60 billion in mostly weapons when it could repair the entire US infrastructure with that money and all of Europe must suffer for Ukraine after covid.. All you will see is one side, little girls with cats and dogs, old women who look like they could be your grandma, courageous teen to 65 forced military fighters and 10 million state dependant refugees now in western Europe who get more than the elderly in benefits, while the Ukranian national anthem plays in the malls, and 24 hr Ukrainian news is broadcast in Ukranian it was a failed state before the war with millions living in western Europe - this war threaten to starve Africa and the middle east ofgrain food supplies no one will show you the starving. Still YOU MUST SUPPORT UKRAINE or your scum, you must be willing to fight and die for it and live without gas and fuel in Europe like Kurdistan a country that never existed,
We know exactly what he'd say, social media is the same monopolisation of political capital by the media we saw in the printing press through those who owned capital & power, then news conglomorates, now social media, and who knows what next, it's likely just going to be horrifying to him that it managed to get exponentially more tolerated or even embraced despite how well known it is we're being constantly bombarded with propaganda to manufacture consent lol
Wasn't Till After 2007, That Social Media Got It's Octopus Tentacles Everywhere Now.
You strike again Ryan, the best introduction to Orwell's politics I've ever come across. I've actually 'liked' this video which is unusual for me.
Very fascinating video it takes you deeper into the mind of George Orwell thank you 😊
I've read Orwell's fiction, but never his non-fiction. I found your video very compelling, and came away feeling the need to track down his non-fiction and add it to my reading list. Many thanks!
I hope you do, John. There are several good collections of Orwell's essays, and just about any one you pick up will contain many examples of his memorable, stimulating prose. IMO, Orwell's novels were uneven in quality, but his essays are packed with astute observations of human nature, politics, education and culture. The world he wrote about is different from what we see around us today; many of the social conventions he took for granted have crumbled. But what he had to say about the underlying nature of human greed, hatred, power and ignorance are timeless.
‘As I Please’ ~George Orwell “SOMEWHERE or other-I think it is in the preface to Saint Joan-Bernard Shaw remarks that we are more gullible and superstitious today than we were in the Middle Ages, and as an example of modern credulity he cites the widespread belief that the earth is round. The average man, says Shaw, can advance not a single reason for thinking that the earth is round. He merely swallows this theory because there is something about it that appeals to the twentieth-century mentality. Now, Shaw is exaggerating, but there is something in what he says, and the question is worth following up, for the sake of the light it throws on modern knowledge. Just why do we believe that the earth is round? I am not speaking of the few thousand astronomers, geographers and so forth who could give ocular proof, or have a theoretical knowledge of the proof, but of the ordinary newspaper-reading citizen, such as you or me. As for the Flat Earth theory, I believe I could refute it. If you stand by the seashore on a clear day, you can see the masts and funnels of invisible ships passing along the horizons. This phenomenon can only be explained by assuming that the earth’s surface is curved. But it does not follow that the earth is spherical. Imagine another theory called the Oval Earth theory, which claims that the earth is shaped like an egg. What can I say against it? Against the Oval Earth man, the first card I can play is the analogy of the sun and moon. The Oval Earth man promptly answers that I don’t know, by my own observation, that those bodies are spherical. I only know that they are round, and they may perfectly well be flat discs. I have no answer to that one. Besides, he goes on, what reason have I for thinking that the earth must be the same shape as the sun and moon? I can’t answer that one either. My second card is the earth’s shadow: when cast on the moon during eclipses, it appears to be the shadow of a round object. But how do I know, demands the Oval Earth man, that eclipses of the moon are caused by the shadow of the earth? The answer is that I don’t know, but have taken this piece of information blindly from newspaper articles and science booklets. Defeated in the minor exchanges, I now play my queen of trumps: the opinion of the experts. The Astronomer Royal, who ought to know, tells me that the earth is round. The Oval Earth man covers the queen with his king. Have I tested the Astronomer Royal’s statement, and would I even know a way of testing it? Here I bring out my ace. Yes, I do know one test. The astronomers can foretell eclipses, and this suggests that their opinions about the solar system are pretty sound. I am therefore justified in accepting their say-so about the shape of the earth. If the Oval Earth man answers-what I believe is true-that the ancient Egyptians, who thought the sun goes round the earth, could also predict eclipses, then bang goes my ace. I have only one card left: navigation. People can sail ships round the world, and reach the places they aim at, by calculations which assume that the earth is spherical. I believe that finishes the Oval Earth man, though even then he may possibly have some kind of counter. It will be seen that my reasons for thinking that the earth is round are rather precarious ones. Yet this is an exceptionally elementary piece of information. On most other questions I should have to fall back on the expert much earlier, and would be less able to test his pronouncements. And much the greater part of our knowledge is at this level. It does not rest on reasoning or on experiment, but on authority. And how can it be otherwise, when the range of knowledge is so vast that the expert himself is an ignoramous as soon as he strays away from his own speciality? Most people, if asked to prove that the earth is round, would not even bother to produce the rather weak arguments I have outlined above. They would start off by saying that ’everyone knows’ the earth to be round, and if pressed further, would become angry. In a way Shaw is right. This is a credulous age, and the burden of knowledge which we now have to carry is partly responsible.”
I read recently that the last four words of 1984 are considered the saddest ending to any novel ever written, declaring, "He loved Big Brother." Absolute indoctrination. Chilling.
But it's important to keep in mind that those words are only the end to Winston's story, not the novel. The book ends with a glimmer of hope, as the guide to Newspeak refers to the language and the nation that created it in the past tense.
Well. My interpretation of those words are "He Loved The BBC". He did work for them and they are not known for their honesty. Where is his criticism of the English Feudal system or the British Empire. There is no mention that when he lived on an island in Scotland where he wrote 1984 he was working as a spy for the British Government, spying on Scottish nationalists. He was right about capitalism and it's corrupting effect on the human condition. No political structure can save us now. Only veganism can possibly save us.🌱
@@berniv7375 Veganism? Lmao, veganism isn't going to stop billions of tons of CO2 from being released by fossil fuels. Only 10% of that is from meat. In a perfect world where no one eats meat (good luck, I couldn't stop if I wanted to and most of the population is likely just as attached) it would make a dent, but the issue would still be there. Not to mention how agriculture also causes pollution, and the rise in demand for vegetables would certainly reduce the impact of veganism on carbon emissions.
Think of the MAGA Shaman "He loved Donald Trump". I wonder if he still does?
🙄 ‘As I Please’ ~George Orwell “SOMEWHERE or other-I think it is in the preface to Saint Joan-Bernard Shaw remarks that we are more gullible and superstitious today than we were in the Middle Ages, and as an example of modern credulity he cites the widespread belief that the earth is round. The average man, says Shaw, can advance not a single reason for thinking that the earth is round. He merely swallows this theory because there is something about it that appeals to the twentieth-century mentality. Now, Shaw is exaggerating, but there is something in what he says, and the question is worth following up, for the sake of the light it throws on modern knowledge. Just why do we believe that the earth is round? I am not speaking of the few thousand astronomers, geographers and so forth who could give ocular proof, or have a theoretical knowledge of the proof, but of the ordinary newspaper-reading citizen, such as you or me. As for the Flat Earth theory, I believe I could refute it. If you stand by the seashore on a clear day, you can see the masts and funnels of invisible ships passing along the horizons. This phenomenon can only be explained by assuming that the earth’s surface is curved. But it does not follow that the earth is spherical. Imagine another theory called the Oval Earth theory, which claims that the earth is shaped like an egg. What can I say against it? Against the Oval Earth man, the first card I can play is the analogy of the sun and moon. The Oval Earth man promptly answers that I don’t know, by my own observation, that those bodies are spherical. I only know that they are round, and they may perfectly well be flat discs. I have no answer to that one. Besides, he goes on, what reason have I for thinking that the earth must be the same shape as the sun and moon? I can’t answer that one either. My second card is the earth’s shadow: when cast on the moon during eclipses, it appears to be the shadow of a round object. But how do I know, demands the Oval Earth man, that eclipses of the moon are caused by the shadow of the earth? The answer is that I don’t know, but have taken this piece of information blindly from newspaper articles and science booklets. Defeated in the minor exchanges, I now play my queen of trumps: the opinion of the experts. The Astronomer Royal, who ought to know, tells me that the earth is round. The Oval Earth man covers the queen with his king. Have I tested the Astronomer Royal’s statement, and would I even know a way of testing it? Here I bring out my ace. Yes, I do know one test. The astronomers can foretell eclipses, and this suggests that their opinions about the solar system are pretty sound. I am therefore justified in accepting their say-so about the shape of the earth. If the Oval Earth man answers-what I believe is true-that the ancient Egyptians, who thought the sun goes round the earth, could also predict eclipses, then bang goes my ace. I have only one card left: navigation. People can sail ships round the world, and reach the places they aim at, by calculations which assume that the earth is spherical. I believe that finishes the Oval Earth man, though even then he may possibly have some kind of counter. It will be seen that my reasons for thinking that the earth is round are rather precarious ones. Yet this is an exceptionally elementary piece of information. On most other questions I should have to fall back on the expert much earlier, and would be less able to test his pronouncements. And much the greater part of our knowledge is at this level. It does not rest on reasoning or on experiment, but on authority. And how can it be otherwise, when the range of knowledge is so vast that the expert himself is an ignoramous as soon as he strays away from his own speciality? Most people, if asked to prove that the earth is round, would not even bother to produce the rather weak arguments I have outlined above. They would start off by saying that ’everyone knows’ the earth to be round, and if pressed further, would become angry. In a way Shaw is right. This is a credulous age, and the burden of knowledge which we now have to carry is partly responsible.”
His words ring true in today's world. Thanks for sharing.
His words rang true in 1948, when it was written. Funny how similar 1948 is to 1984, don't you think? This all took place during the second red scare. Winston Smith was George Orwell.
Wow, what an amazing history lesson. Thank you so much subscribed
What a writer! Extremely prescient as it now turns out. I have most of Orwell's work, some of which I've read several times. 1984 is to me the one book which reveals his true genius. Should be required reading for everyone....
Prescient was a perfect choice.
Agreed .... Orwell was one of the genius writers in english literature.
1984 was a shameless rip-off of a novel called "We". He was a disgusting antisemite and a hypocrite. He compiled a dossier of people he regarded as threats to national security for Special Branch. Orwell is the most overrated writer in the English language. He made many predictions and most of them were wrong. His novels were rubbish and his essays are no better. His early death is what saved his reputation. If only that Spanish sniper had killed him.
You don't have his work. You have his WORKS. Orwell would smile from heaven if you would learn that one.
Alas, it often is required reading, but many people who teach it--and most who read it--can't seem to apply it to current situations. Oh, sure, they do so mechanically, but the problem is that the book starts at the end point of totalitarianism rather than describing the slow buildup to it in which the totalitarians conceal what they're up to, and the way they do it. Student readers dismiss the book as too extreme. They don't get it that the processes getting to the extreme are well on their way, and that they aren't some Nazi jackbooted militarists but capitalist media manipulators and the slimeballs like Trump who learn how to use that media. Worst of all, it is the extremes on BOTH sides--the Trumps/DeSantises AND the progressive "cancellers"--who are trying to drag things into varied forms of totalitarianism, so the situation is more complex than in Nazy Germany or the Soviet Union. BOTH of them believe that "there is no objective truth"--only "perspectives" and "lived experiences," or "all the media are equally bad liars"--and they use this position to break down the existing structure and insert their own forms of domination.
This does a wonderful job of summarizing Orwells thoughts while keeping their complexity.
Listen i am HALF RUS HALF UKRAINIAN and watching this war from both sides and angles the way his words mirror today's reality in this war is just sureal and unbelievable...sickening but accurate to a frightening degree..
Now imagine both sides are controlled by the same elite...yet this is never realised by either side...
@@paintingholidayitaly The line leading to this truth is way to thin to see....
@@vitalybilo it is exactly what Orwell was expressing...the ultimate tyranny? If you expect the line to be visible then you expect too much.
Half Russian half American here, dual citizen. Have friends in Ukraine I still keep in contact with to this day. And I completely agree with you, I see the same thing. There will never be a winner to this war.
I spent most of my life in America, but the fact I was traveling back and forth between two countries over my childhood so much so that my first memory is crawling on an airplane made me grow up trusting neither power and neither narrative
A fascinating video essay. Thank you.
Ryan, I am curious about your background. There is nothing in, "About". Forgive me if this seems nosey. I was just wondering where you are from and how you wound up where you are now (intellectually/productively)? Thank you for your work. I think your channel will do very well over time. I will happily pass it on.✌
So happy i found your channel. So refreshing to get an informed lecture on history. Thanks ❤
Reading '1984' before 'Down And Out In Paris And London' and then on to 'Homage To Catalonia' really didn't do me any favours but has made me think a lot in hindsight on how '1984' was a fantasy/slight reality biography almost of Orwell's actual real life existence, thoughts and actions. Still extremely intrigued, have read no other of his writings as yet but certainly shall and probably always revert back to their content for ideas and pathways in life. RIP George.
I feel like 'Homage to Catalonia' and 'Looking Back on the Spanish War' are my two favorites of his, and a much better place to start than '1984', which is just bleak and a bit depressing. In my opinion! Though I only say that as someone who started with '1984' and then missed out on the joy of his writing for many years.
Thank you for this brilliant analysis. I can’t wait to learn more about him. Knowing that he made a distinction between Democratic Socialism and the extremes of capitalism and communism is vital to understanding a path forward that amplifies his voice based on his international experience, complexity of authentic thought and commitment to reality
Your videos are the best on the Internet.
3:19 political ignorance - boxer 3:48 group thinking - political predilection 4:25 actual quote 4:27 propaganda 5:15 objective truth missing 5:26 abandoning the truth 5:55 7:56 8:13 no single truth in totalitarianism 6:17 define totalitarianism 6:36 1984 7:09 unofficial political orthodoxy 7:28 gramophone minds - volunteer orthodoxy 8:43 language - Newspeak 9:07 2 safeguards 9:25 define liberty 9:35 intellectual liberty 9:49 freedom 2+2=4 9:56 anti (economic) liberal anticapitalism 10:29 democratic socialism
@ryanchapman Hey can you pin this comment!?!? I appreciate the effort that goes into timestamping, Cryptic. THX!
Superb addition to Ryan's chapters. Thank you!
the avatar of totalitarianism today is Rupert Murdock and his Fox Noise Network, and its spin offs and all but one of his children. It is worse now, more than ever.
Dear god. Like over half of the most popular comments are about how 1984 came true. This is unironically insane people think we’re anywhere remotely near the situation in that book in any way. You don’t see anybody who escaped North Korea or Russia for the United States whining about how truth is dead.
"I can't say the N word, literally 1984"
If you don't agree with me, then you are insane....YOU Are 1984
@@pezvonpez this ^. If I had to take a demographic guess, most of the people typing "1984 wasn't supposed to be an instruction manual" are most likely on the alt-right fash pipeline who think that "wokeness" and "cancel culture" is the downfall of western society, and most likely didn't watch until the end of the video.
Excellent summary, you did a terrific job, kudos
Anyone who truly payed attention to this clip or who knows Orwell's work will recognize many of the things he referred to when looking at the U.S. political landscape today. He warned us of this and we'd better take heed. If you can imagine what the state of our world would be if Germany had had the kind of power that the U.S. has today then it should become clear to everyone how much danger we are all in at this very moment!
He wasn't warning us, he was warning his contemporaries, our parents/grandparents.
Germany persecuted the people who run the US, big difference
@@erictjones no he was warning about human nature and recognizes the dangers of the extreme right and extreme left and extreme capitalism where freedom is controlled. The CNN town hall is a perfect example. I am sure that Orwell would castigate most of what goes on in most countries as manipulation and deception.
As long as people still read Orwell there is hope for us.
but in Florida it's consider a woke book....so not on the shelve anymore...
Thanks!
Well done, interesting and informative. This video makes a sharp distinction between 1984 and Ayn Rand's Anthem, books that were represented to me much as the same philosophy by academia. Individuality is as much threatened by an absolute egoism as it is threatened by an absolute egolessness.
Like Rob, just want to say thank you for a thought provoking effort. PS an american reading Orwell in the 60s, I thought he wrote about our form of government/economics; later I discovered it was originally aimed at our then cold War enemies. But it looked identifiably familiar.
It's interesting that he described being shot as a 'painless shock' -- that was my experience of being in a really bad car crash, as well. There was some pain in my case, but far less than I'd expect. I honestly think a badly-placed paper cut may have hurt worse, at first. The surgery afterwards left me in far more pain than the accident!
This is part of why is is unwise to argue that morality is about reducing pain, because a lot of bad things already do not cause pain. Objective morality needs to consider other aims, like preserving life and virtuous behaviour, as more important than minimising pain,which can only be one objective among others.
Superb video. Thanks for the great insight on Orwell himself.
We need a George Orwell now! We also need to be able to find a way to know he speaks the truth. You can't trust any media today, maybe we never could. I'm old and as I grew up with no social media, I listened to the radio, read news papers, and when television came along watched that. I assumed I was hearing the truth but probably not. I only knew what they told me and now realize it may have been extremely distorted. How do we make good decisions when we don't have the truth to base them on.
In the current political age we live in He'd be smeared, his character assassinated and cancelled with weeks
You have to disseminate the truth from as many different sources as you can. When you find a source lying or hiding the truth their credibility goes down.
Orwell wouldn’t get published in the mainstream today.
@@cushyglen4264 He's out right banned most places already
KZhead is the place to find the truth BUT you do need to be wary and exercise critical judgement. That said, I fear AI will soon destroy and ability to discern what is true from what is made up and we will all become confused, lost and easy prey for populists.
Wonderful figure, for people interested in more Orwell backstory - I thoroughly enjoyed "Why Orwell Matters" by Christopher Hitchens
Hitchens was a drunken chickenhawk republican hack.
Thankyou. I read a lot of George Orwell when I was young and at university and just after. I love wearing a recently bought New Zealand tee shirt, red with a sheep looking like that classic pose of Che Guevara. It has written on it, “The Sheep Revolution” ((New Zealand is famous for having more sheep than humans), “Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others”. I found that so clever, in a post-modern way. Chomsky says in a discovered introduction to Animal Farm that Orwell intended as the introduction, the book was in fact about British Society. That he was commenting on the British class system and the products of the British elite private schools. That he changed the introduction at the insistence of the publishers, as presented here. You can find Chomsky saying that on you tube. Chomsky being an excellent source and unlikely to be wrong on this. Orwell’s political books are brilliant, many from his own experience. I as a working-class Londoner going to Sheffield Uni in Yorkshire at an impressionable age, during the lead up to the coup by Thatcher, soaked all this in. Orwell writing eg Keep The Aspidistra Flying, about his life working in London department stores in the 1920’s, or The Road To Wigan, about the coal miners of Northumbria (just north of Yorkshire, Homage to Catalonia, about his experiences in the Spanish Civil War (to my amazement recently I discovered Edward Heath the ex UK Tory PM fought on the same side as Orwell, my Uni friend Sue, later, chaperoned Heath to the Salt talks between Ragan and Gorbachev in Iceland to limit nuclear weapons. While hitching our (Steve of posh UK private school background and myself) way though France to get to Barcelona to give blood for money as a 19 yr old uni students, I found myself for a while on the beach with my rucksack at dusk, on my own at Perpignan, 19 kms north of the Spanish border. This is a part of Catalonia; they speak Catalan as well as French. A police estate wagon pulled out. Two police approached me, escorted me to the wagon and put me in the back. They took me to the police station and attempted to question me (I only speak English; they did not speak English). They went through my things (I assume they think I was a hippy and had drugs and was illegally going to sleep on the beach, reasonable assumptions on their part, it was summer and lovely weather). They found my book, George Orwell’s Homage to Catalonia. They loved it. All of a sudden from being villain I was a hero. All smiles and welcoming, they packed up my things put them and me in the wagon and drove me back to the beach, the implication being, I think that I could sleep there. Steve and I had a tent in a campsite, elsewhere so I didn’t. I can only put this down to George Orwell being recognised here as a war hero of the Spanish Civil war and these policemen of the left/progressive persuasion and probably hated fascists given that they are French (nice twist). If it had been 20kms away and 1 km into Spain I think the story would be different. Franco was still in power at the time and I doubt the Spanish police would be sympathetic. Maybe not so though, that part of Spain is Catalonia and basically all the population were communist or anarchists in that war and Catalonia Police may well be sympathetic as well, even more so perhaps as that’s is where the fighting took place, not in the French part. The train from Perpignan to La Tour De Carol in Spain on the Andorran border in the Pyrenees is well worth taking by the way. It winds through the Pyrenees, if it still runs, and has no roof on it, just lovely on a sunny day.
Thank you for your post x
I never fully understood Orwells genius until now, he's so much deeper than his writing style lets on
He is one of the greatest real political analysts in the ranks of Machiavelli, Carl Von Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, Carl Marx, Adam Smith, Piere Bordiou, Edvard Berneys.
He's about as deep as Karl Marx. That is not a complement. He has some looney theories about economics. Another delusional thinker who gets praised after his death for some rehashed grandiose ideas about utopia.
@@Ikaros23 Bernays wasn't a political analyst but a master of mass communications and pre-calculated persuasion- for what it's worth. This guy was a "two-edged sword" of sorts and not a humanitarian unless it served the cause.
Orwell's first novel 'Burmese days' is one of the best books on the impact of 'Imperialism'
I meant to add to the above comment, ' one of the best books describing the negative impact of imperialism on colonized population - I say 'best' because this fictional story describes so vividly the way it impacts and what happens to an indigenous population - 90 yrs later we are seeing 'live' how that works out when a false sense of nationalism replaces 'imperialism', by one group of the population and replaces the elite colonial power and oppressors it's own people! Look at Myanmar, (Burma), look at India, look at Sri Lanka, Look at most African states ....
Fully concur. Plus: its simply a great read.
@@kjr2868 the Guinean indigenous are suffering from Indonesian Muslim colonialism today.
💋.......a stunningly wonderful video. Marvelous. How brilliant of Orwell to summarize a situation in a few succinct words......
"Why Orwell Matters" by Christopher Hitchens, is an amazing biography of Orwell, for anyone interested