Best SWORD for modern-day self defence?
Thank you to HelloFresh for sponsoring this video! Use code SHADIVERSITY16 for up to 16 FREE MEALS + 3 Surprise Gifts across 6 HelloFresh boxes plus free shipping at bit.ly/3emMpiN !
What sword would be best suited for modern day self defence?
My novel, Shadow of the Conqueror Audio Book affiliate links:
US: www.audible.com/shadbrooks
UK: www.audible.co.uk/shadbrooks
CA: www.audible.ca/shadbrooks
AU: www.audible.com.au/shadbrooks
Ebook, Paperback and Hardcover available from most major book retailers, here are a few of the main ones:
Amazon affiliate link (be sure to navigate to your country's amazon site):
amzn.to/2XErUaR
Barnes and Noble:
www.barnesandnoble.com/w/shad...
Kobo:
www.kobo.com/au/en/ebook/shad...
If you like the content and want to support the channel, you're welcome to do so through patreon or subscribe star:
/ shadiversity
www.subscribestar.com/shadive...
Awesome Shirts and chainmail print clothing: teespring.com/en-GB/stores/sh...
Visit Calimacil for the best replica foam swords and LARP weapons: calimacil.com?aff=38
Buy my sword IMPERIOUS from Calimacil: calimacil.com/products/imperi...
Come check out my new channel KNIGHTS WATCH: / @knightswatch
Community run discord server: / discord
My official website: www.shadmbrooks.com/
Having a free hand when using a sword for self defense is extremely important. You can utilize a shield or secondary weapon such as pepper spray. My own personal preference for a secondary weapon is a .357 magnum.
go full medieval mode with a gunsword or a gun dagger... a gungger? XD
@@LucasTheOnion full Final Fantasy VIII then xd
LOL That's a great off-hand weapon!✌😸
Wait... 🤔
Bruh this guy's living in modern day Bloodborne yharnam
So what you're saying is I should walk around with Sting? I wonder if it'll glow when Orcs are nearby...
All my favourite creators follow each other... and this makes me happy 😄
Plenty of Trolls running around...well, I truthfully don't know if Sting would react to Trolls. I'm sure you'd know Guy
Maybe it glows with crackheads too
Cool to see you here.
Hey I found a pedo defender out in the wild
The best sword is a gun. It technically uses explosive powder to send a really dull micro sword at the speed of sound.
this might actually be the best comment on anything ever
This is a great take
There's even models that fit in your pocket and have more range than even the longest two handed sword lol
Hey, this guy gets it.
That's more like a arrowhead/smooth mace xD
"Much like how you need a weapon to defend yourself against attackers, Hello Fresh will help defend your stomach against the scourge of hunger!" I know it's too late, but here's a hindsight transition for you lol
The _gladius,_ if you use it in accordance with my strategy-which is walk around in full Roman legionary garb and armor, so everyone think you have the full might of the Roman army backing you, and no ruffian will be willing to f- with you. Well, doesn't work so well now, but it used to work like a charm back in the day.
The best weapon is one you dont need to use :D long live the Empire
Ah it's so nice to see fellow immortals are well. As much as I love the Gladius I believe that Filipino swordsmanship is what we are looking for in this case.
Split the difference and get a gladius machete.
XD
I also bet the gladius. Easy to use, functional in close quarters and tight spaces, versatile, and relatively light weight.
Ah yes, the classic Bolo-Machete family of swords. We widely use them here in the Philippines as tool for foraging, travelling, and defences, and my ancestors used it for their rebellion and quelling unrests. Its a super versatile weapon AND a tool, which most Fililpino Household has one, even the rich.
The bolo is synonymous with the fighting Philipine spirit.
I remembered using an old bolo for digging
I bought one to be cool when I was a teenager. As an adult, it’s my go-to tool for brush clearing and tree trimming.
We have it here in our house Edit: our teacher that supervise us onces in one of my camping for boys scouts brougth one and its pretty useful ( really really useful )
Imagine not wanting to own a machete
I'm reminded of a story from the Society for Creative Anachronism in which a member was returning from an even and was attacked by muggers, one of which tried to stab her...but she was wearing chainmail under her cloak, which completely negated the attack. She then drew her sword and the muggers bolted.
Interesting how her carrying a sword didn’t prevent the criminals from engaging. It seems to support my opinion that HEMA type weapons aren’t superior for self defense because of their relative obscurity to criminals. On the her hand, machetes are universally recognized, psychologically more intimidating to criminals and more likely to cause the attacker to disengage.
Oh...SCA is full of stories like these and it happens more than people realize. Rennies definitely have an advantage in these encounters, but for gods sake don't bring a knife to a gun fight. Be really certain.
@@buddymoore1543as an officer in high crime areas, i have actually gotten to witness knife v gun several times. Including in my own self defense moments. People vastly underestimate knives and overestimate guns. In one case, two hit men were sent to kill a rival gang member. They pulled a gun, forced him into a car (don't ask me why, they usually just shoot you idk what was different here, but they tried to take him alive). Needless to say, inside the car, the victim pulls a knife and fucks them up. Stabbed the gun guy first. He fired a shot, completely missed, jumped out the car and bled out quickly from neck wounds. The second dude did get two shots off, one striking the victim in the belly, doing a lot od damage, but he too was fucked up very badly. Nearly died on scene, later died at the hospital. Victim ended up with a severe injury, had to essentially have bowl reconstruction done, but lived. We never got the full story. According to him it was random. Long story short, in close ranges, think 10 feet or less like public bathrooms, cars, busses, so forth, I'll pick an edged weapon or a revolver. What fucked those two guys up was they had glocks. If you take a glock out of battery, by grabbing it, it won't fire. The first dude, his gun got grabbed. He got one shot off before it was out of battery, dude apparently knocked it aside and it missed. Then it was knife against unarmed man clinging to a useless weapon. Second man shot the victim as he turned on him, but the victim grabbed his gun two, second shot went off, but missed. Then he got fucked up too. There are a few other cases. But I found that to be the most interesting.
This definitely happened.
So: a sword and historic body armor are great for self defense, in most scenario's where you would realistically be walking around wearing a sword and historic body armor. I think that story sums up the discussion on swords for modern self defense quite nicely. Anything you're not realistically going to be carrying around at least about 75% of the time when you're outside your house, including all of the riskiest moments (going clubbing at night, visiting a sports match where hooligans might be present) is probably not worth considering for self defense. It's (in my opinion) much better to carry nothing than to spend a lot of time, energy and money to select the perfect weapon and then still carry nothing. Al old housemate of mine also fended off a mugger, he hit the guy with his skateboard, because that's what he had on him.
I agree completely that the Gladius is the best choice. A close second is my Cold Steel Sword Cane. It’s a really comfortable cane, and when you pull the blade out you have approximately a 3 foot long very strong sturdy blade, and you can use the cane shaft in your off hand as a blocking or blunt force tool. You should do a video on sword canes and compare them. I’d bet a month’s pay that you will really like it.
As someone who spent a great deal of his adult life in armed conflict there's one thing I would like to point out. Not everyone will be capable, nor willing, (Even to defend themselves believe it or not) to strike someone with a large bladed weapon. Despite believing they could. The amount of visceral feedback that results from that is enough to give most people pause for good reason. That's why most self-defense weapons (In the modern day anyhow) are either blunt weapons (That generally render someone unconscious, or do minimal 'visual' damage), SMALL bladed weapons or weapons that can be used from a distance. It's far more impersonal. Spilling someones intestines on the floor is not something most people are equipped to handle and those that are forced to never want to again. Chopping someone's arm off, or burying a 22" blade in someones neck is a pretty intense way to step into the 'self-defense' forum. I'm not at all saying you shouldn't if you find yourself in that situation, or that it can't be done because you should protect yourself by whatever means necessary. I'm simply saying that a lot of people (In the modern day, especially in 1st world countries who have never been exposed to any type of real violence) would have difficulty using a large bladed weapon in a confrontation unless they had absolutely no other option and the threat to their life was imminent. Even in that context I'm not sure how many would actually bring themselves to do it. After all, a half of a second hesitation is usually the difference between life and death by itself. I think this kind of thing gets glossed over a lot in discussions about self-defense and weapons in general and it should be at the very least discussed. There are two types of responses in high-stress situations. Fight. Or Flight. People like to think they're prepared for terrible, mind-bending scenarios and the fact of the matter is you don't know what kind of person you are until that type of situation occurs. A person who is more prone to flight (As opposed to fight) is going to have a considerably difficult time slashing or stabbing someone with a large blade. I guess my point is that the weapon type itself could have a considerable impact on the individuals ability to make the judgement call to actually use it and should be part of the equation.
Hm. Use a sword that hasn't been sharpened, at least not well enough to spill anyone's guts? Might be easier to hit if you know you will not see blood, or not THAT much of it (okay, getting hit on the head can spill a lot, but anyway), but a bit longer blunt sword might still break bones, and definitely should be able to cause rather painful soft tissue damage if used with sufficient force (I got permanent soft tissue damage on my leg from slipping and falling on top of a very narrow and high doorstep a couple of decades ago). Of course, it would way less effective, but better than nothing? And if the fact that it is pretty blunt is not obvious at a glance it might scare at least some people away. If there are people here from the Society for Creative Anachronism they may have heard the old story of an SCA lady who was threatened in some city late in the evening while on her way home from either an event or some sort of practice. She was wearing a cape and carrying a long sword under it - presumably blunt - but they left when she pulled the cape aside and they saw the sword. Okay, I'm not sure if that is a true story or not, but it was always told as if true. I think there is a filk about it (it's been a few decades since I was active). If it's true I suppose one alternative is that they thought she was the dangerous type of crazy.
i would like to add that to my knowledge self defense is usually limited to the "minimal means to incapacitate" in most civilised countries. meaning that disemboweling someone because you "feel threatened" by someone is a bit over the top... defending yourself with a deadly weapon against an opponent with a club or a knife should be the last option. so carrying a weapon that can be used better on the non lethal end (a cut that can fully incapacitate someone will likely have them bleed out if not treated) is preferable because you are less likely to be blamed of using unnecessary force if you use the weapon that is inherently less lethal
@@TheScarvig Agreed. Justin, Pohjanakka, you all bring up very real points. I honestly agree with all of you and read your replies thoroughly, wanted to comment and hoped someone would read what I had to say and landed here lol sorry. I'm a forty year old woman with a chronic illness and in America, if you have a disability you're not allowed to own a firearm. Fortunately (somewhat) I'm part of what's now called HEMA, I'm old enough that it's actually a point of pride that folk like me helped make European "martial arts" become a thing, part of an ongoing campaign I took part in since before I graduated in 2000. Back then, we had nothing, now we have resources and science and even SCHOOLS!!! And I'm not part of it anymore due to my broken body lol!!!!!!! ........ ...... .. . Anyway, now that I'm older (and I'm still a student of all martial arts, including Eastern) and aware of laws and legal .... things... I do genuinely recommend Professor Chad's advocacy of the "stick." There's a reason police still use it the world over, and if you're competent enough regarding your own body, training, and limitations you can incorporate ALL of your sword/longsword techniques into a good meter or 50 inch stick. *sighs, monotone* "Branch out" in your training... LOL no seriously, seriously. I've taken to training with a rough "bokken" length stave, and intend to make my own oak bokken soon to my own specs and grip, strike points, etc. , training to use the majority of high and tail-guard strikes in hallways, close quarters, and you have the advantage of using it like a jo stave and even applying "walking stick" and akido techniques. The greatest (and it *SUCKS* that I have to say this at all) benefit is that right now " a stick" isn't considered a lethal weapon. Like thumbs, foreheads, and trachea strikes. I mean nugs, kuh nives, and hurtful feelings. Best wishes you guys, let me know what you think? Take care and be well :)
@@wren7195 I do not want to pry or be rude, but I do not want people in the USA left with the opinion that having a disability automatically means you cannot own a firearm. In fact, there is no reason a disability resulting from physical injury would prevent you from owning a firearm, outside of any individual draconian state laws. The types of disabilities that would prevent one from owning a weapon would be mental illnesses, or severe developmental delays, that could result in a court ruling that a person is mentally incompetent, unable to care for themselves, or result in an involuntary commitment in a psychiatric facility.
I feel like most people wouldn't realize how much cutting and stabbing can do to someone and how bad it is until after they do it. If my life is truly in danger and see a sword or knife, I'm gonna swing or stab and worry about the consequences of that violence after im safe.
If Shad was a medieval sword salesman. He would have sold me a bunch already.
He starts with one, convinces you to buy it, then shows you the one that beats that one specifically.
@@shadow105720 and then shows you the one that can beat the one that you bought to beat the one you bought. And the cycle continues.
Lol
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
...Hopefully a humble tradesman, A salesman will convince you to buy snake oil.
I didn't even think twice when the video asked the question of, what is the best self defense sword, i immediate said gladius. My thoughts were size, double edge, good thrust. Size is important because in modern day we're typically in buildings, you want something you can swing in hallways and rooms with shorter ceilings.
Same. I immediately knew. I’d been looking at buying a new sword and Gladius was the type I decided on. I own a katana but from the time I spent with it. I learned it was beautiful but not super practical. Atleast not at the length I own.
agreed
@@brucewayne6582Agreed
Same. Was the very first thing I thought of.
Thing is, the United cutlery stuff this chap is talking about, isn't meant to be very good is it? As far as I've heard..
Also small point, of which I'm sure you're probably already aware, is that while thrusts are incredibly deadly, they often have less "stopping power" than cuts. That is to say, a thrust may be lethal, but the target may be able to fight for several seconds or even minutes before they fall down and die. On the other hand, whilst a cut may not be lethal, a severed tendon or limb can be instantly incapacitating. On the other other hand, a point is very useful for keeping an enemy at bay...
I always wonder why maces are rarely considered
@@Ilethsamael Possibly because of their limited versatility. A mace is a great weapon when you can get a good swing in, but what are you gonna do if you only got the room for a thrust? Besides, a mace can be quite heavy to carry.
@@darth_dan8886 while I agree with you in general Mace's do not need to be extremely top heavy to do damage, are way shorter than swords and are very lenient in how to swing them. I think they are exceptional in anything higher than 1vs1.
@@Ilethsamael Additional point! I am sorry for the tardiness. A mace with a spike at the tip, although hard to find in some cases, will let you effectively thrust depending on the weight and dimensions of the mace.
Lmao. By what logic is a slash wound deadlier than a stab wound? A two inch hole lets out a lot more of that red stuff that a cut. Source: I've touched grass before.
Shad: _picks up a machete_ Me: _waits for the line_ Shad: _doesn't say "that's not a knife, this is a knife"_
Something you just expect from an Aussie :)
A bit… Oh, for those who might not have seen it, highly recommend ‘Crocodile Dundee’
Awww... :(
"that's not a knife" (puts out the Kriegsmesser, legally a knife according to some twisted medieval german law) "that's a knife"
Paul Hogan: THAT’s a knife! Shad: This is a SWORD, bitch! 🤣🤣🤣
Lol i was working on a video on swords for home defense and found this video haha. Thanks for the shoutout. I will have to rewrite my video now because we mostly agree and you covered it well.
I got two words for you, Star Blade.
EXCELLENT *bonfire lit* also nice chopping action. I wonder if he's done a video on the German great knives yet. 13:50 good 😊 blade me gusta
Try researching, then perhaps a review of UKRAINIAN COSSACK / SLAVIC KINDJAL as personal defense. It was specific designed as a Cossacks lightweight secondary weapon, 13"-21" variations through history, and regions, ultra fast quick draw, and maneuverability, with chain mail piercing ability. KINDJAL= Cossacks best friend, as millions of Cossacks wore them, during active duty, and equally every day during their normal day to day lives, as a personal self defense implement, since this was the case, incidents that would be a street fight some other place, were instead KINDJAL duels. They can also be accurately thrown, even from quick draw. A respectable terrifying highly advanced performance self defense implement. I highly recommend. 👍👍🙌😄👏👏👏👏👏👏
@@GlowingGreenz Kindjal is sexy weapon👻
@Miles Doyle ok bud, what If Jesus enslaved children...what then. There are 1000s of years that separates you from both being of whom you speak. Assume nothing and do not condemn your fellow fellows. This world wages genocidal campaigns on children regularly, and Jesus sold swords before he was executed. As someone who has dealt with it he topic of incest, r*pe and p*dophelia, I do not find your musings accurate to either faiths. Pls leave this thread. In retrospect, my cat has 8 nipples, she gave birth to seven kittens, am I the second coming because I called it? NO! Jesus was a conqueror, he had secrets too, Mohammed existed in a time when men were slaughtered and their bones ground into dust for cement. Before you go gas lighting an entire thread over something you claim to know so much about, consider Aisha's perspective. Fool.
Today, some armed forces, instead of issuing a longer blade than a standard 8"-10"/20-25cm fighting knife are issuing tomahawks, either with a spike or hammer head opposite the blade. you can find something similar in the hardware store in the hammer section as a "shingling hammer' or "roofing hammer"; with a hammer head opposite a blade for lifting asphalt roof shingles. This has the advantage that it is made as a "tool", so does not fall afoul of any "dangerous weapons" laws if you are walking around in public with one on your belt. Plus some jeans have a loop intended for the carrying of such a tool.
Military needs to consider pack weight, so survival, breaching, and combat utility in one tool is incredible for them. Seems like you'd be worse off at grapple-distance because an axe is easier to grab, but I wouldn't know. Still, in a self-defense context outside of hiking, I don't think the axe is better than the knife. Sure, you can pass the axe as a tool, but you can also just conceal the knife. So for self-defense in my opinion, knife beats axe, and in certain situations, Gladius beats knife and axe for the reasons he discussed, but is still pretty inconvenient.
@@shane9287 if you are in a knife fight you will be stabbed 99.9% of the time so it’s pretty awful for self defence since you have to get close enough that you will be hit back The axe is far more intimidating than the knife so I’d say on the street it’ll help you out more I would think a long ass hammer is a better idea though no one’s gonna try to stab the person with the 16 inch hammer they’ll just bonk ya on your head
For military options look into modern entrenching tools.
Fun fact no military issues knives over 10 inches long. And for the most part, in the last 100 years plus they never have... They also don't issue tomahawks, they pass out demo tools to various assault teams ect....
@@stevefilms1997yup, this is why I always groan when I see self defense "experts" suggesting knives as viable weapons for the purpose. If you get into stabbing range, things have gone very wrong and your only hope is to be aggressive enough for the opposing guy to go down first and pray that someone gets to you before you bleed out.
Spot on with the Gladius. I paid $38 for mine and it’s added to the arsenal. The only other sword I can think of that would come close is a naval cutlas.
Where did you get the gladius for $38?
yeah i think shad gets too focused on european medieval and usually forgets other time periods and other cultures weapons, i am even surprised he remendered a gladius this time. as i was the whole video thinking a gladius would do the best job. As the naval cutlas also good option, but it is too big to carry around conceiled woulndt fit narrative of this video i would say
Cutlass, yes!
Cutlass or artillery saber, similar in size/length but a little pointier.
Many moons ago, I was deep into re-enactments and medieval festivals. I had come back from a weekend event and my gear was in the trunk of my car while I was delivering pizza. I ended up getting threatened by a ‘mugger’ with a 3-4 inch knife. Managed to convince him that I kept the money in the trunk. I discovered then, that pulling 36 inches of gleaming steel and brandishing it at a would be attacker actually puts real fear into people because swords are not common these days, so seeing one tends to boggle some folks.
"That's not a knoife." [brandishes sword] "Now _that's_ a knoife!" 😂
That's the type of situation you would WANT to get in, when you have that in your trunk 😂
This comment made my day.
@@kevincrady2831 [Pulls out 2 handed kriegmesser] oi mate, wanna go out on the porch and have a BBQ?
Like the classic line out of Crocodile Dundee.
I was actually wearing a longsword as part of a medieval Halloween costume when my GF and I were mugged by a guy with a knife, back in the eighties in downtown DC. The look on the perp's face when I bared 40" of steel was priceless, and something I'll never forget.
When you accidentally start a bossfight when trying to bully the npc's:
LOL NICE,, I have a real long sword as well, I have tested the metal and it is well made, I have many swords, a few cheaper ones will take a set and stay bent. My long sword will bend a ton and come back true. (ALL MY SWORDS ARE OF QUALITY CARBON STEEL, NO STAINLESS CRAP) I have used a 5C-cell maglite to bash a scum breaking into cars at an apartment, his buddy told him to get me as I closed distance, HE INSTEAD GOT A FUL RIGHT HAND STEP IN SWING ACROSS HIS TEMPLE, I thought omg I have killed him AS HE WENT FLAT TO THE GROUND, his great friend screamed holy f and just ran as fast as he could away. The other guy got up and ran off as well, I ran a short way telling him I am going to KILL YOU, but that part was honestly just so I could tell ppl that last part and lol about it forever.
PS I have told that story before, and there will and always is some coward whom assumes I am lying.. WIMP LOSERS CAN NEVER BELIEVE WHEN MEN ACTAULLY MAN UP IN REAL LIFE
@@veryangryduckpl2122 queue Vordt soundtrack
Did you remember to say "That's not a knife" ?
I think a cross guard is good. If you get into tight measure (grappling even?), you can punch with the cross. Against a thick winter coat, the ability to crack ribs through the insulation is irreplaceable. Ergo, 15th century messer is my pick.
Not only that but it also has intimidation factor what robber would pick a fight with the guy who has a messer?
A guard can be grabbed though- that was his point with not using a one sided blade. Plus cross guard were primarily to defend from other blades which most people today don't carry.
@@donald347 This is true so my pick would be a one handed messer style sword with a slight reverse edge and no guard, well none other than to protect my own hand from slipping onto the blade obviously.
What about a sword size Rosario?
plus a hand guard lets you parry if the other person has a machete
In my experience as security guard I would say something well concealed, easy to pull out less then 2 seconds. And very light. Oh and can be worn in any clothing type. Smaller than 15in but bigger than 3inchs
One of the things Shad talks about here is something many self-defense experts and survival experts harp on - Program Compliance. It doesn't matter how great or effective or versatile a tool or weapon is if you don't have it with you. Having something that's passable, mediocre, or "good enough" that you have on you all the time is better than the really really great and effective thing that you left in your car or at home because it was too inconvenient to carry.
The worst gun that you have on you beats the best gun you left at home.
@@BillyWitchDoctorDotCom Reasons to put more time in on your belly band or pocket pistol than a full sized carry pistol. Not many folks I know have enough real estate in their daily wear to hide a carry pistol.
@@CtrlAltRetreat I'm a big fan of the Sig 365 - very compact and comfortable to wear yet doesn't sacrifice any functionality. That being said I'll carry a Taurus Curve sometimes since I can just toss it in a pocket without a holster or belt - even though it's one of the worst, least reliable guns ever made.
@@BillyWitchDoctorDotCom One of these days I'm going to have to compare the p365, shield plus, and hellcat in the same shooting session. My shield 1.0 has treated me well and I shoot well with it but my lcr honestly get carried more with how easy it carries. Stay safe mate.
@@CtrlAltRetreat My sister in law used to carry an LCP but she had reliability issues with hers so she replaced it with a Shield. She really likes it. Shoot straight, be safe!
Here's the thing though - no one in their right mind would initiate a fight if you have a Greatsword on your back, even if you can't draw it... Plus its a huge confidence booster for the wearer 🙂
I imagine that you could get picked on because some thug thinks that you are clowning around and doesn't recognize a big sword as a real weapon thanks to modern standards.
Also it would make you irresistible to the opposite sex, because of the implication
Work out and wear two. >->
Funny thing is, I made this exact point in my D&D game last night. We were discussing which party member should be bait for the bandits. The bard suggested the paladin, because of course a group of rag-tag bandits will jump to attack a large man in full plate armor with a greatsword.
And it’ll make you completely unarmed against anyone not in his right mind. So you’re dead. Good job! 😃
A gladius with hand protection would be the best scenario. Since it doesn't have hand protection, someone could disarm you with a swift baton strike to the fingers holding the sword. Maybe you could modify the gladius to have a saber/rapier type of hand protection
A broader type rapier would be my choice too. Superior reach. And it's a myth that a rapier can't cut. In my experience it cuts better than a gladius.
I have considered this very subject a lot lately as I get older. I have not been able to do any testing yet, but from my experience in the various martial arts, including HEMA (Historical European Martial Arts) and sword fighting, I have decided I want a combination between a war hammer and a cane sword. The war hammer head would act as the cane handle at the top, with the sword handle at the bottom, where a quick twist would free the sword. I say the sword handle at the bottom as opposed to at the top with most cane swords, is now I have two weapons, I flip the sheath around, and I have a war hammer as my secondary weapon. I can strike with the hammer or the spike head, or use it as a defensive parrying device that I can hook the attacker or their weapon and pull them off balance, out of position, or even disarm them.
A gladius is still ridiculously large to carry around. I think a long dagger would be more realistic. But the disadvantage with such weapons is that you basically always must be prepared to kill. Therefore I would prefer blunt weapons.
"They could try to grab the back end of the machete." That's true, but there's an advantage to a single-edged blade in this context. It has a less-lethal setting if needed. To be clear, hitting someone with the dull side of a heavier longer machete is still gonna hurt like hell, and probably break bones. It might even crack their skull. But it's possible to bash someone with the dull side of a machete in a way that can be justified in a situation where they're clearly a menace to you but aren't (yet) trying to kill you.
Legally speaking, if they're threatening you with bodily harm, and you pull out a machete, the legal consequences will be the same regardless of which side you choose or even if you never actually use it. All that matters is whether or not you had legitimate reason to believe that you were in danger and you could not escape or prevent the confrontation, so any situation where you'd be justified to hit them with the blunt edge, you'd also be allowed to hit them with the sharp one. If they're serious enough about trying to hurt you that they're coming at you while you're holding a weapon, you need to make sure you take them down in one or 2 hits or else they might get the chance to take the weapon from you.
If you hit them with the back side of a machete you have to have been legally able to hit the sharp side. As it's going to be an assault with a deadly weapon regardless what side you hit with.
Lol, just get a gardening machete, it has a saw blade on the backside
@@drake1360 just wanted to clarify. in america theres no duty to retreat. So everything you said except being required to have no escape available.
@@winningsince1992 it is assault if YOU attack THEM. It is self defense if THEY attack YOU
the gladius did made a comeback in the early renaissance as the Venetian cinquedea and also in the modern day in the form of the tooth pick machete.
Those are really so different from the gladius that you could call any short sword a gladius by that reasoning. Now, if you wanted to say the qama is a gladius, then you'd be right. They're nearly identical.
It was also the inspiration for the Nazi military dagger
Thanks, Shad. I will keep it in my miind, bro, during the post apocalyptic struggle for survival.
As he was going through the requirements/parameters I kept going straight to "Cinquedea."
@@Bacteriophagebs Check out the four main types of the gladius that were used. They each have different blade profiles and lengths.
I'm really glad you shouted out hard2hurt. I really enjoy their channel, it's played a big part in not only what I choose for my daily carry but how I think about what I have as well.
Surprised the historically popular swordcane got no mention, but entertaining!
Historical sword canes are essentially small swords, which are great for self defense if you have the training/fencing background, but for people who don't something weighty and choppy is better.
MY Sensi used to make sword canes that we sold at Ren fairs. I know all about them. Ty.
Me: *feels down* Shad: *posts a new video* Me: *immediately feels better*
Same bro I miss watching Shad’s content but college has been a pain 😢
11:07: "Yeah, if you had one [greatsword] in a civilian scuffle and you could use it for self-defense... there is a general rule that can't be taken too much out of context, of bigger can usually be better with swords." The immortal tale of Sir Trude comes to mind! One night, after a long day of Ren Faire practice, a lady knight of the SCA was walking home. Through Central Park. In the 70s. Her heavy cloak was pulled tight against the New York chill, and she didn't even seem to notice a mugger coming up on her. He accosted her and demanded all her money. She said no. He pulls a knife. "I've got six inches of steel says you will." She laughs it off. He slashes at her... and hits chainmail under her cloak. Then she reaches under the cloak and draws a broadsword. "I'll see your six and raise you thirty-five," she said, brandishing it at the very-much-_not_-wearing-armor thug, who promptly turned tail and ran.
That's beautiful lol
This is also a good story which illustrates the cowardice of most criminals: When met with equal or greater force, they will flee. It's a "Your money isn't worth my life" situation.
@@andorfedra tbf at that point itd be foolish to stay. 6 inch knife versus an armored knight. Theres no winning that if he gave her the room to draw
Unfathomably based.
@@jailoutafreecard4414 In the 70s? "You think you are knight?", the young thug, victim of his time, jeered, leaving her poise in surprise. "THIS is a knight!", he claimed haughtily and pulled down his raddled pants. The police recieved several calls from awakened residents, startled by "the screeching of a hundred hell cats", that wouldn't end. What they found was armoured lady on the ground, lot able to recognize them through her tears of laughter. Despite her excellent description of the well-known criminal, the suspect was never seen in the city again.
I think a falcata against unarmored opponents may be the perfect blade for personal defense. Short enough to be easy to control in a narrow area or in a crowd, causes deep wounds, and light enough to be rapid
Always preferred the Greek Xiphos to the Roman Gladius. But my top pick would be a Falcata.
A sailor's cutlass was designed for use in tight spaces, was double edged, and had an integral hand guard. It could chop and it could stab. Moreover, the handguard can be made to act also as a knuckle duster. That alone gives it the edge over the gladius.
Yeah but I can't find a sailor's cutlass at the local survival kit section in Walmart, but I can find Machetes and imitation Gladiuses.
Double edged? Cutlass is in essence a take on a saber, as far as I know those aren't double edged. What am I missing?
Curved blade, not usually fully edged on the back, if at all, not optimized for thrusting, as well as being significantly longer. In a straight fight, they are superior, assuming everything else is equal, but this wasn't an analysis of sword vs. sword combat. The gladius is more optimized for most modern interactions. It is easier to carry in crowded spaces, while transferring into or out of vehicles, and works quite well in a grappling situation. To reiterate, I agree with you that the cutlass has an edge over the gladius, but only if they are facing each other head to head. Most of that advantage falls in reach, though. The knuckle duster is nifty, but it doesn't really take the cake for this lineup. I also understand the mentality of preference. I'd be more likely to carry a bokken then a gladius, as I am more practiced with it, but I still agree with the analysis from a point of weapon trait alone.
@@WanderingWolfe A cutlass does not have to be curved. If you look at british naval cutlasses, you will find that the 1804 and 1889 patterns are straight blades for example. The 1889 was specifically made to be a good thruster, as it has an in line point and is sharpened on both edges at the tip. Also they were designed to be used in tight spaces, as those were common in boarding situations.
@@ulfkoehler9730 Very true, and e cellent points. I tried to stick with the 'generally' statement, since cutlasses tend to have notable design variance. That said, I do feel like in this particular hypothetical, wherein another sword isn't involved, the length is detrimental. Sitting around 30 inches, usually, a cutlass is far less convenient for the modern person to carry about. I know the Gladius is about 25 inches, but that difference is huge in wearability. I still agree, with equal training and footing, the cutlass wins, but it has some unnecessary extras within the given setting.
Another question people tend to overlook: availability. Most people might not know where to get a good sword, but machetes are sold all over the place.
Also the law of your place is important too. In germany machetes unlike swords are "tools" and not "weapons" and as such allowed to carry in public.
Just to start, I'm from the US. So basically finding a sword or a machete is going to mean a trip to the Internet and then a few days wait for it to show up at my door. Ironically, I'm less likely to run into trouble with the law by buying a gun at a local store than some sort of knife/machete/sword. 'Merica!
It doesn’t matter. Sword or machette is useless as a modern day self defense weapon. They are killing weapons, so your going to be sued for attempted murder in majority of western type countries even if you’re the defender.
@@scobra1cz all good weapons are killing weapons. If it consistently cannot be a threat, it’s unreliable, and you shouldn’t be depending on say pepper spray alone to defend yourself.
@@shovel662 Blunt weapons, telescopic batons mainly 😉
It makes sense; the best sword to use in a time of low sword proliferation would be the kind developed before their use became prolific.
I 100% agree. I used to be obsessed with this stuff when I was in my teens and chose the Praetorian Gladius from Valiant Armour (if I'm remembering the name of the site correctly). Beautiful blade, and I still have it 10+ years later (although I wish I wiped it down with a gun oil consistently. It's been a while, but I used to practice yeilding it with one or both hands and became quite confident in my ability to use it. I'm definitely considering getting a buckler some day, as well.
I think, given from my own experience, it's going to be a machete of sorts given the rural culture. A couple of years ago when my were visiting a rural village in Africa, the guide said that a majority of people carried machetes as a tool and self defence
Machetes really are the best bladed weapons ever as long as your opponent isn't wearing armor, except maybe the spear.
Machetes are a primarily a farming tool, similar to scythes in Africa. They are not primarily a tool of self defence. It's not that dangerous there.
@@RussiasSufferingInUkraine no, its that dangerous. here in the philippines there had bean murders from the farm field because of some farmers with grudges. an they use machetes
@@lawrencevalero8111 what an awful way to go.
In my country lots of machete use as a farmers tool. And people up en fighting with them, you can see here some kzhead.info/sun/dceznNerrGaMmYk/bejne.html.
depends on what's culturally acceptable in the area. In the modern context, your ideal self-defense weapons that aren't guns, are going to be tools, there are some double-edge blades that'd qualify as tools, though they aren't common. The other factor to consider, the more urban you are, the smaller the easy to carry and acceptable to have blades get, all the way down to pocketknives, in which case you want one with a belt or pocket clip, so you can draw it quickly,
Yeah the little raptor claw (krambit?) knives seem popular among the beardy prepper types.
Two of them rush the gap and throw the first knife from 5-8 feet away
I live in a country where all weapons are not allowed (outside the stand, hunting or shooting range), and tools only if there is a valid cause, such as to and from the workplace. What is left is a handbag with a large mobile phone in it or a keychain on a string, and a umbrella.
I live in an Australian city. Weapons are heavily regulated and lots of random searches happen in some areas. Most security and police will look at peoples pockets to make sure there is nothing with a pocket clip in there. My Concealed carry for the past 6ish years has been a Kabar Combat Kukri with a custom kydex sheath and a Schrade dagger with a custom kydex sheath which are both on a thin belt worn underneath my clothes.
I live in California and I can technically walk around with a sword or large fixed blade knife. But, that is if I feel like having the cops called on me and worrying about getting shot because of it. So, a big pocket knife is my safe zone.
The one thought I had when you mentioned a cross guard is not needed: in my neck of the woods, asps are not unheard of. Being able to trap an asp or other small club-like weapon could be useful.
I think for survival reasons that a simple Spear point knife with a paracord handle is pretty awesome becuase it doesn't take too much to transform it into a Spear which is incredibly useful
any knife and some electro tape on a stick makes a spear ;)
As silly as it sounds, I like my combat shovel. I keep the edges very sharp and it handles like a double bladed hand axe which is easy to throw. Also works well as a hatchet, a canoe oar, and also as a shovel.
shovels were used in WWI trench warfare
I agree about the shovel. I've one that due to the way it was made has four edges and works well for chopping right through small tree limbs.
@@Manco65 Coincidentally, mine also has four edges and cutting small limbs is what I use mine for the majority of the time.
Not silly at all. COLD STEEL sells a replica of the Soviet Spetznatz(?) shovel. Extremely tough, well balanced, makes one helluva weapon.
@@ridermak4111 Yep, that’s exactly what I have. Upon further review, I feel I should add that I have the shorter of the two Cold Steel shovels. I don’t think I would like the longer one very much, it seems too unwieldy to me.
One thing with the machete is that it's very readily available for the vast majority of people, so it's popularity is justified. Having said that I'm glad that the gladius got it's chance to shine, I would have gone for that one.
About 15 years ago I bought the Schrade Tough SCHLM large combat machete: brass cross guard, 35 cm blade, double-edged, slightly curved downwards with the (symmetrical) point a few centimeters offset below the middle. Something of a crossover between a machete and a gladius. I immediately liked it. It seems to have been discontinued but can be found on Ebay.
The gladius you picked out at the end to be the best, I literally the exact one I just bought last month, I am very happy with my purchase, it may be my favorite sword yet!
At the start, I really thought Shad was going to pick the cane sword as the best. Later when he asked which sword combined his specified qualities I thought gladius. Disappointed I didn't learn of a new sword, but pleased I guessed right.
Yup, pretty much went the same way. Cane Sword then Gladius, though I think the Cane Sword is far better simply because you have something in your off hand (the scabbard) that can be used to defend yourself and keep distance.
was thinking the same thing dude
yep though you'd look like a rare animal for using a decrorated cane sword in such modern days without having any visible disabilities its still better disguised than carrying machete around the city like a maniac XD
Yeah, I was waiting on Shad to pop up the nanotech, collapsible sword.
@@wizardtim8573 Cane Sword is illegal to carry in most states and could land you a misdemeanor or felony.
The best weapon for self defense is one which 1: You can carry discretely in public 2: can be used by weak people against stronger assailants 3: can disable a stronger opponent before they hurt you. The best weapon for self defense is a handgun of at least .38 Special caliber. Then the problem of legal restrictions come in. Most places don't let you carry a firearm, or a sword, in public. In Australia or Japan it is extremely difficult to even own a sword at all. In Japan it's illegal to carry even a pocket knife. England has the reputation of arresting the victims of assault for brutally defending themselves. Basically, in civilized countries, in case of attack, the best tool for self defense is a cell phone. Try to stay alive long enough to call the police and give as clear a description of your assailant as possible so they can find and arrest your murderer. Civilization is over-rated.
I carry a wooden walking stick when I can’t carry a handgun. They are legal everywhere and are very effective if used with skill.
why at least 38 special, thats a weird spot to set the bar at
In many countries, the state considers its monopoly on violence to be absolute and the most important rule in their system. As such while arresting the actual antagonist of the scene is the just and moral thing to do, the State finds threats to its monopoly on violence far more egregious than any burglar, serial killer, or molester. Ergo, in the eyes of the State, the person who used violence to defend themselves has challenged the States monopoly on violence and is considered in contempt of the State and needs to be made an example out of. Note that I disagree with this philosophy. I much prefer the ideology of the American Constitution, because the reality is, a State should be for and by the people, not above and over the people.
@@Leo.23232 I'd assume stopping power - a .38 is essentially a 9mm, but can pack a bit more punch with the right powder load. It's certainly better for quickly stopping assailants compared to a .22, .25, .32, etc.
@@TechnoMinarchistBall States that don't allow their citizens to defend themselves effectively tell the people not to turn themselves in after the fact. They also encourage people to go on the offensive before the fact, to purge people who might be a threat to them rather than letting the authorities deal with it. In other words, they're playing with fire and that fire will eventually consume their societies.
I think a more interesting variant of this conversation is how this works applied to modernity. It's illegal to brandish a firearm even if you intend it to deescalate a conflict. It's a felony in most places in America. Nobody's carrying around machetes either, let alone long swords. In a modern context, particularly in the western world, where obvious weapons are so taboo in public. I feel it would be better to discuss the use of common objects that are items that people carry with them everywhere they go. Or, items that are likely to be close at hand in a building or on the street or perhaps in a shop. For a woman, for example, a purse or handbag could be an effective small shield used to deflect a knife blade. Especially, if the bag were chosen with this idea in mind. In many Asian martial art forms, various weapons are actually designed from their original forms as tools and farming implements. The same spirit should be used for choice of weapons today. Consider what tools you carry or have near to hand in your everyday life and consider which of them might serve as an effective weapon in a pinch. I also like the idea of discussing this within the confines of a SHTF scenario. In America, guns are and would be everyone's first choice. But, ammunition could become scarce after a certain point. This could force everyone to resort to what are essentially medieval weapons to survive. Bows, crossbows, knives, swords, machetes, etc. Armor is not readily available so slashing weapons might be a good choice. Although, a piercing wound has proved historically, in the absence of good medical care, to be much more lethal. I suspect that surgery would be quite rare in a SHTF scenario. After having studied medieval weapons and history for many years, my favorite is the spear and a small shield. It requires very little technical expertise to make a good spear. And it has the advantage of reach. It's resource inexpensive to produce. It also doesn't require a great deal of skill to use fairly effectively. A shield can be made easily with resources that are available everywhere. They are far more effectively defensive than the average person believes. And, they are also utilized effectively with little martial practice. I don't know though. Just something to consider.
This is a FANTASY channel for edged weapons otaku who have never been in a real fight.
This video is just gold, laughed so hard at the stick vs rapier comparison. "dead...alive"
Yup, I figured correctly that the leaf blade gladius would be the most efficient weapon for self defense in modern times, mainly due to the lack of armor, and the fact that is specifically what it was designed to be used for, lightly armored opponents.
I think my khyber bowie is good, too. 18 inch length, double edged, and less bulky. I'm 5 foot nothing, so it's basically a short sword in my hands. Guys don't much bother me when I carry any blade on my belt. So, maybe guys don't really think women with weapons is sexy? Or maybe my town is full of wimps. ✌😸
@@PhoenixLyon Oh I have *such* a thing for women with weapons😍(and also not-too-tall women)
@@lindgrenland Warhammers are good weapons. Yor trailer looked good.✌😸
@@PhoenixLyon Why thank you😌
Lets be honest the best weapon is the one you have on you. No point in getting to that situation and wishing you had something. THB a simple glass breaking hammer is a great self defence weapon in a pinch and can be hidden in any pocket.
That falcata may actually be the best option. People would see it as a quirky knife or machete, not a sword. And it would be less cumbersome in a vehicle, while also being useful if you're attacked while in your vehicle. It's difficult enough to have a 6" knife on your belt in a large SUV or truck.
Well isn't that just a machete in the end
Obviously the David Bowie Knife is the best modern day sword
@@MrDoverfield Reminds me of the babe 🤔
We all greatly appreciate the way your mind works, practical and realistic.
I'm sure a modern tactical gladius is better but you can walk into any hardware store and buy a machete for a fraction of the cost and it has other legitimate non combat uses.
Machete wounds are not fun man, but the gladiolus Gives off an additional threat
personally, i have a flashlight as a self-defense tool :D one with a more wavy edge to hit the enemy more effectively yet over 3k lumen to just blind them and it also got a strobe flash setting to disorientate your opponent. so seeing you talk about a flashlight for self-defense is just great to hear
@@a-_-a Hehe
The strobe function is especially effective against an attacker who suffers from epilepsy.
lanthorn shield would be legal most places and work VERY well.
Just going to leave this comment here so I don't clutter the comments section, the yawara stick is literally just a small stick you hold. Perfectly legal everywhere because it's just a stick. It can help transfer force when punching or give a hard ice pick jab or forward thrust. You can probably use a flashlight as a yawara stick.
@@a-_-a I can imagine someone who gets hit with that would back off 😨
I'd love for Shad to talk about the effectiveness of self-defence umbrellas. They seem like the most acceptable/appropriate choice in an urban setting.
Ooh, and cane swords. Don't forget cane swords. And swordbrellas.
Any of ya'll know about collapsible batons?
@@edwardfontaine7108 hard2hurt hates them
And surprisingly effective against bats, man.
@@edwardfontaine7108 I think hollow weapons are probably less durable. Maybe if you add a shock feature.
I think the wakizashi might also be viable. people always forget the shorter two options of the Japanese swords. obviously we would want them made of 1090 steel or something of similar quality, but they would be easier to conceal compared to the gladius
But, it still has the same limitations as any single-edged sword. I think the larger point Shad was making was to have a weapon that has more versatility, which is the Gladius. No doubt wakizashi is a fearsome and useful weapon, but it lacks an edge (😉) that the Gladius provides. And in a self-defense situation, any extra bit is extremely important.
There are even tactical wakizashi, I think the German army uses them.
@@sharathsh9987 Wakizashi can stab efficiently, unlike the Katana. It's not a miniature version of the same design. The Katana is fundamentally adapted as a cavalry sword -- though slowly became smaller over time. The Wakizashi was always a personal defense weapon in close quarters and confined spaces. It's meant to stab. Unfortunate that he didn't address it at all. I also agree with another post that pointed out that, while stabbing will kill faster, slashing will end a fight faster. Catastrophic damage to a limb tends to end a fight immediately. While a gut wound may be fought through for awhile longer.
@Niall K I don't think there's anything in my comment that warrants your reply. I agree with you, mostly. I know that, like some single-edged blades, wakizashi can also stab. Even a katana can be used as a stabbing weapon, although the tempered point and the ridge make slashing more effective (obviously). I'm in the Gladius camp and not the wakizashi camp simply because Gladius is a double-edged weapon. As I said, and as I sort of inferred what Shad meant, Gladius just offers a little bit more versatility. You mentioned that wakizashi is a good stabbing weapon and a good personal defense option, which Shad admittedly glossed over, and then you sort of weakened the case for wakizashi by saying that stabbing is less effective than slashing in a fight. I don't know what your point was here?
LOL...that was a cool video. I would choose the SOGzilla Kukri that has a saw back spine. Ghurka choice of weapon that could detach a skull from horseback, but it is so much more. You can use that kukri for defense, as a hatchet to chop wood, clear brush or make a camp sight trimming limbs, and the rounded portion can be used to skin game, prepare a fish, as an ulu knife to chop food, dig or simply backhand the enemy. It's light weight and has rubber handle that mitigates shock. Cold Steel has a two-hand kukri that can be used to clear brush or whatever. Do like that Gladius sword as well...pretty good video.
As part of the defence force, we are taught that just having someone patrolling with weapons, and guards at the entry/exit points will deter 99% of people from trying to break in or launch an attack. So just been armed is a huge deterrent.
In America we've got like 30k gun deaths a year. 80% of these are either suicide or gang violence. so really less than 10k gun deaths in a country of almost 400m people. That said, we've between 1.5-3m defensive uses of firearms a year. Most of the time just having it deters an event.
@@IronwolfXVI I really enjoy the debate about open vs concealed carry for that very reason. There's a lot of nuance to the topic, that people seem to blatantly ignore to push narratives.
@@Rafael_Fuchs yeah, some people say that if there were an incident that the open cary person would be targeted first, which may be true. But it may also prevent unarmed people from doing something. Or if everyone is open carrying, nobody is going to walk into a place and rob it. They going to walk in, see all the guns and politely ask where the toilet is.
@@IronwolfXVI not to mention that the incidents where mass shootings occur are often at locations where no one in the vicinity is visibly carrying a weapon. Say what you want about the right to carry a gun but history and life in the poorer part of the world proves that weapons as deterrents have been effecting 90% of the time. The fact that no one has launched a nuke since WW2 proves it.
@@mrii114 yeah, a lot of school shooting statistics are just accidental discharges from a cop or an unrelated gang shooting down the road.
I work as a security guard for a few pubs on the east coast of NSW. I’ve used my torch a few times to temporarily blind people who have been trying to fight, it’s no fight-ender but it definitely gives a window of opportunity for myself and coworkers to disarm and restrain offenders.
As a security guard in QLD, i wasn't allowed to carry a knife but a big-ass 12 inch long Mag-lite torch could give people a good whack if needed, after blinding them of course
@@KyranFindlater the might of the light up mace is unrivaled
@@KyranFindlater Haha, a 12 inch torch? Thats basically a mace.
Olight warrior m2 is the best flashlight for self defense when combined with a grappleing martial discipline.
Lead batteries work too.
im very rarely watch sponsored advertisements, usually dont at all, but here somehow its so genuine and the Shad having so much fun himself that i enjoyed it a lot. great work! ^^
Blade profile 100% agree, but I would love D guard on mine.
In Pennsylvania where I live, you can legally carry any knife that has a "common lawful purpose". There was a case where someone took an 8 inch butcher's knife out of their house and went over to threaten someone else, and it was ruled that since butcher's knives have a very common purpose, he could not be charged for carrying an offensive weapon. I assume a machete would fall under that ruling, while a gladius would not.
Yeah I’m Canada you can carry any sized knife you want as long as you don’t conceal it and it’s a fixed blades knife. ( and don’t take it out and wave it around for no reason like an idiot ) and all concealed knives are illegal regardless of size and so are and assisted opening or gravity opening knives are illegal.... soo may as well just wear a 5.25 Kbar on ur belt much better tool in every way. But when I go into the woods hiking i always have an 7 inches kbar on my back pack strap and a 11inch on my belt and the small kbar along the small of ur back on ur belt
The only legal foldable knives you can carry need two hands to open and if you can only open it with two hands But the cop can open it with one ur getting charged no if’s and or buts
You got to love Pennsylvania
That sounds like a legal loophole rather than legal.
Funny how people assume America is all about weapons but we have some insane regulations and stupid on damn near everything lmao. Not nearly what people misconceive it to be. "Shall not be infringed" seems to be given lots of wiggle room.
There is a loophole with certain 'tools' in Australia. Garden tools, specifically gardening machetes' and primary wood axes. As long as they are kept mainly with gardening stuff they are legal to own. Found this out when I got bored of pruning branches the standard ways and using a machete is much more fun and practical.
I work with hatchets more often but yes, machetes are massively fun to use.
That's why I use my rice flail (nunchucku). It serves two purposes. Firstly, it's an agricultural tool, officer; and, secondly (and by far, more importantly) it gets Shad riled up.
I think this is why machetes were and still are one of the most popular blades of modern days. They were used world wide in revolutionary wars, precisely because, it's a tool that most working class individuals have, and are allowed to have. And in guerrilla war it's extremely useful tactically.
Huh? In NSW there's essentially no limitation on owning swords.... just can't carry a blade in public.
@@IamtheWV17 wasn’t there some law about owning ‘zombie swords’ or some stupid legislation like that?
I’ve thought the gladius was the best self defense sword for a long time. I’m glad my gut feeling is backed up by logic from such an esteemed expert!
imagine trying to rob someone in a back alley and they pull out a goddamn roman gladius
So this might sound dumb, but I own one so I feel the need to vouch for it. In effect a 16 inch US Bayonet is a good option. It's profile is tiny compared to a gladius, has roughly the same reach, and the top quarter to half of the back side usually has a cutting edge as a lot of the ones that went into the surplus market were often times sharpened in the field by G.I.s. And it is deceptively heavy as far as the blade goes because it was made to go through a person, which makes it decent at chopping. Another upside, if you own a Springfield, an M1 garand, or a Trench gun with bayonet lug, you've now got a pseudo spear, attached to your gun.
Ive had one of those, they are not well balenced as a sword but excellent as a bayonet and they are blunt by design as they are stabbing implements not cutting implements, they are essentially bar maces
I'm a big fan of bayonets in general, lot of them come across my desk at work and it's always hard to resist buying them and taking them home. I picked up a couple versions of the Buck ground combat knife, which feels a lot like a more refined bayonet style knife. Least Buck-like knife they've ever made, but they're fantastic.
Or a US 30 carbine. Those are made for the US bayonet too. I have the carbine and the bayonet, my grandfather brought his back from the Pacific.
I feel if you have any a bayonet attached to a gun then you have defeated the point of bladed self defense
But when you want a 7 foot spear or pole arm, use the Mosin Nagant with Bayonet!
This makes me incredibly thankful to live in the US. The idea of facing off against a person with a sword and not having a snub nose would suck, like a lot
@@Goblineng very true, situational awareness is critical. So is Profesioncy
@@Goblineng Actually, the two situations are comparable. An idiot with a knife can be expected to run you down if they are more fit and mentally prepared than you are (which is likely the case if they are the instigator). Cops with pistols routinely die to knife wielding idiots who charge them from ~10 yards away. Yes, in theory you could outrun a knife, but you have to notice the person, turn around, and only then can you begin accelerating. An idiot with a pistol has horrible accuracy. It takes a LOT of practice, regularly, to be able to accurately shoot someone ~10 yards away. Additionally, a single shot from a pistol is often less lethal than a single stab with a knife. The latter leaves a much larger wound. Pistols are also very loud (even if "silenced"), and are more likely to get the cops/ambulance called faster. Pistols are also harder to use in a grapple than a knife (one of the reasons cops with pistols routinely die to knives). Both are scary, but I'd honestly be more scared of the knife. It would depend on the exact range, positioning, fitness, and sobriety of the attacker. Pistols have a higher skill floor (a low skill/intoxicated attacker will miss), while a knife is quite lethal no matter how drunk or unskilled an attacker is. Since most attackers are mentally unstable/low skilled, it stands to reason that the weapon with a low skill floor would be more dangerous. Against a truly experienced attacker, you'd be dead no matter what.
Haven't watched it all yet, but the best self defence weapon is clearly a shovel/spade. It can be used as a spear, for reach and jabbing with the edge. It can be used like an axe. It can be used as a blunt clubbing instrument. It can be used for defence. It can be used to bury anyone you got a bit over enthusiastic with hitting. And here's the absolute best bit, even in England, you can walk around town with a shovel on your shoulder and nobody will care.
I’m realizing that my self defense strategy of pepper gel in one hand and a small pocket knife on the other is an actual decent idea instead of me just being paranoid. Thanks Shad
The concept of carrying a weapon of war when you expect a fight and a self-defense weapon when you don't is still used with firearms: most people have rifles and shotguns staged and ready to go, but when you're going about your daily life, you don't keep a long gun strapped to your chest: you keep a concealed pistol.
The difference between home defense and every day self defense
@@shyla7722 yes, but there's more than just that: if I needed to be in an area, and I was expecting problems in that area, a weapon of war would be coming with me.
Do you really? I have hardly ever wished that I was carrying a gun. I went backpacking with a cousin who strapped a 44 magnum to his leg. That extra, imbalanced weight made him a lot sorer than the rest of us by the end of the day. We were theoretically in bear country, but a can of bear repellant is only about 10 ounces.
@@shishkabobby as someone who dealt with bears a lot. I'd trust a .44 over a can of bear mace
I don't know anyone who keeps any firearm for home defense. Or carries anything for self defence.
I carry a self defense weapon daily. I also live in the USA, and in a constitutional carry state, so I concealed carry a 9mm pistol. I have never had to use it, and I hope I never have to. I do love bladed weapons though, and I enjoy these videos.
This video reminds me of those youtube ads that refuse to tell you what they're advertising, but will constantly tell you why what they're advertising is the best thing ever.
OK, I'm about to start the vid (paused at intro), and I've thought about this a lot. Specifically - home defense. I think a naval cutlass is it. The sword was designed for CQB in tight spaces against unarmored opponents when guns were a thing. Short blade to not get stuck in walls/ceilings (but not so short to be a disadvantage - long enough to give some reach), complex hilt to protect hand and resist disarms (and you can punch with it), curved for the slash but with a tip that can thrust. Those are all advantages in home defense scenarios. IF combined with a UHMWPE heater or rotella/targe thick enough to stop small arms (and you ensure the hilt won't interfere with the shield), you have a VERY viable modern home defense option. Especially with targe strapping partially freeing up the offhand and the spike - so many options!
A buddy of mine used to always walk around with a long, thin towel hung around his neck. One day I asked him why, and he showed me. He trained with the thing a lot, and could do really nasty moves with it, disarms, dislocations, chokes, etc. The best thing about it is that he could take it ANYWHERE and no one cared. If you can train with it, it would be a great choice.
That's from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
@@ctrlaltdebug That's what I told him, haha! “A towel, [The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy] says, is about the most massively useful thing an interstellar hitchhiker can have.”
A long thin towel worn around the neck sounds like what most people call a scarf.
@@TheStabwest Different material. You could look at it and tell that it was for wiping sweat off your face, not as a scarf.
I used to train with quarter staffs for fun. The average walking stick isn't too far off from a size good enough for me so I have a walking staff and no one ever questions it. I won't be doing lethal damage unless I get some very lucky shots, but it is very non descript in most areas (especially since I made it colorful like a hiking staff). I just am a person with a stick minding my business. I don't have to use much force at all to make someone regret targeting me. A towel is definitely another good option. Similarly non descript but can be an extension of grappling. Or you can whip someone right in their eyes. My brother and I used to do that to each other and it's both painful and disorienting.
The only "self defense tool" I've ever used was my belt as a means to restrain someone. Worked pretty well while waiting for the cops.
Would you recommend wearing two belts then? One to keep your pants up and one for defense? Because if I pulled my belt off, my pants would also come off, and I've a feeling I'm not the only one wearing a belt because their pants won't stay up without one.
@@roofdogblues7400 I carry around a chain made of can tabs. If cops bug me about it I just 'em it's an art project.
@@roofdogblues7400 Honestly, if could defend myself with a belt my opponent would likely be undisciplined enough to make my pants falling down an opportunity and not a hinderance.
@@roofdogblues7400 nah just hang like a thousand belts off your arms and around ur body, then you've got some for lassos if needed.
If you’re quick enough, you can wrap a belt around your forearm as makeshift armour against knife attacks.
A weight forward blade, such as a kukri, is my choice because even if I can not get a full swing I can still good momentum from wrist action. It may be my training but I prefer a kukri, no longer than 18" , in my right hand and a short (3" - 4" blade) dagger with a good cross guard in my left.
I agree. I have a few Kukris that I train with and they are incredibly deadly weapons. You can throw so much energy into a slash but then quickly recover. My favorite is my KHHI Panawal Special (McCoy) but I have a Jungle as well which is smaller but very fast and easier to conceal.
A gladius is a one strike weopon though no messing about
I love you man. I gave you 2 subs, from my 2 channels, you are underapreciated but Please keep your head up and walk forward, you are quality, no joke.
YBer Skallagrim discussed “home defense sword” five years ago, and also picked the gladius.
Top pick was his Cobra Steel Kindjal, to be precise. 1055 carbon steel (Now X46Cr14 stainless steel), affordable, comes with a simple belt loop leather sheath. It's a bit on the shorter side and quite light compared to a true gladius though, I wonder how it would compare to the coconut test.
@@lassassindu5071 I have the Cobra Steel Kinjal. It's a nice little blade, very light, but still cuts well and thrusts wonderfully. It's also amazingly cheap for what you're getting. Were I carrying a sword out I'd probably go a little shorter for convenience, but it's not bad, and works fine for home defense. (I presume. I've never had to use it for anything other than funsies backyard bottles.)
When you said that the sword would have to be one-handed I immediately thought that you should be looking at the best modern day SHIELD for self defence.
flashlight to blind the enemy
Flashlight yes but a dual purpose briefcase shield could be useful as well
I was thinking of a hat that could be used as a buckler. Similar shape, inconspicuous, you can wear it anywhere.
I recently discovered that there are no restrictions on blade carry in the US state I live in, including swords. So legally I could carry a sword around. Personally I would have a smallsword in mind, but the only thing stopping me is I don't want people to think I'm crazy. XD
Just my opinion, the barong machete from cold steel is a GREAT contemporary infighting blade. That being said, I ALSO have the Combat Commander Gladius, and love it:)
I get a very strong feeling that if you're in a place/situation where guns are off the table, swording someone, regardless of how justified, will land you squarely in a cell.
Absolutely. Occasionally there is a news story like that
Still better than death…. But Tis the unfortunate part of not having a right to carry a gun. Glad I live where I live.
@@jaycebaldwin6482 doesn't that just mean that your attacker is that much more likely to carry a gun himself?
@@jonezbonez2505 sure, if they get one. But I carry everyday… so do others. And it isn’t just about protecting yourself but others too. As long as you train lots, learn lots and be realistic with possible threats and “soft targets”(malls, big stores, schools, ect.) you will be much more aware of when somthing could happen. You should seek every advantage you possibly can, your life, and others lives depend on it. I’d much rather face a firefight vs blade on blade… again whatever you can get ahold of to defend yourself or others with… trainings is what matters.
@@jaycebaldwin6482 your point with being realistic about threats is valid. In my mind, (and I am not trained with firearms) I pictured the typical mugging situation. Depending on where the mugger stands relativ to your position you could try pulling your own weapon as long as he doesn't hold you up with a firearm. (you could also try running). If he only has a knife, you have at least a fighting chance. That would still be a poor idea, as I have seen blackbelts repeatedly fail against 2 armed attackers but that's what practice is for. But that's only One specific situation. Depending on when and where something happens things get different as you could resolve a situation in a Mall with a well placed shot whereas I would have to risk myself in a possible knife fight. But at that point I admit I would not try because with a gun or a knife or a baton, I am just not good enough. Better to let professionals do their jop before I fuck it up.
My Guatemalan friends, that I worked with years ago, always had a machete for work. They showed me how to swing it properly, how to make a carry sling, so no sheath was needed, how to use the sling for grip. It's not highly tactical, used in that way, but is more versatile than most other work blades.
For modern day self defense with historical weapons (instead of modern, like that updated gladius), I would think about the environments we're most likely to fight in, and then choose something used in analogous settings. Modern self defense is not going to happen on big wide-open battlefields, but will probably take place somewhere indoors. Who fought indoors? Pirates! And navy guys in general. Ships are just floating buildings, they have cramped quarters, and they all managed to kill each other when they needed to. The way they did that was with a cutlass. A cutlass is about the same length as a gladius, has a pointy end for stabbing, but makes an excellent instinctual slashing weapon. For those who don't train regularly with swordfighting, a cutlass is going to still outclass all modern knives out there, and just by reacting to threatening movement in a natural way, it can deliver devastating cuts, or chop off limbs. I think about all the poor men and boys who were pressed into naval service at the time when the cutlass dominated the seas. They weren't noblemen trained from an early age in the art of swordfighting, but they could fight very effectively if given a cutlass. And if you do train with a cutlass you can do very well with it against anything that doesn't have more reach. What was the reach weapon used in the age of sail? Same as it is now: the firearm. Do as the pirates did; carry a cutlass in one hand, and a pistol in the other. If somebody tries to attack you up close, slash at them with your cutlass to deflect their attack (or end it), and then shoot them directly in the face with your pistol. And, more importantly, deter the possibility of attack by owning a lot of cannons. If they do attack from long range, use your cannons.
"honey can you open the coconuts and cut the melons" shadiversity: *makes a extra video about why soft targets are bad to show weapons edge*
As a historical combat enthusiast, I tend to practice a lot. About a 15 years ago, I worked overnights at a hotel. One slow night, I decided to do some form work in the lobby and went to my vehicle to get a practice blade. As I was leaned over, a man snuck up on me and demanded my wallet and keys. Out of the corner of my eye, I noticed he had a knife. I happened to have a rapier within reach and turned around to face him. He quickly decided he had other places to be. Had he been carrying a firearm, I know better than to resist. But the force multiplier factor was in my favor that day. As to practical self-defense, I live in a place where I can carry a firearm, so I do. I also carry a knife and flashlight. When I happen to visit somewhere that's disallowed, I have a large flashlight that could effectively double as a club and I've fashioned a belt holster for it. My state actually has a law against long blades on a person (even with a concealed handgun license), or I would absolutely carry a tactical gladius, or at least a larger knife.
In close combat blades work better than bullets and the intimidation factor of someone confidently pulling out a sword when you aren’t expecting it is not to be underestimated
I find it kinda hilarious that you can carry a gun but not a sword. What is the logic here?
@@jakublulek3261 It's because there is an old law on the books about carrying fixed blades above a certain length. It's largely ignored (or even chefs could get in trouble on smoke breaks), but somebody in one of my fighting groups is a cop and says that it would probably be enforced if you carried an actual sword.
@@JeremyCulbreath interestingly, a guy who told me years ago, that the difference between a sword and a gun is if you draw a sword, the situation tends to deescalate, but if you draw a gun someone is likely to get shot; tried to get a concealed carry license for a sword cane, and the sheriff where he was, ultimately decided no license was needed.
Personally, I would want to carry either a cutlass or a good large bowie style knife. The cutlass was designed to be used in close quarters, and features a good guard, unlike some blades. The bowie was designed as a fighting knife, with a decent guard and a blade that can cut and stab effectively.
I agree. A Bowie knife or a small machete or a cutlass.
Cutlass absolutely. Hand protection!
True. I have a machete with a full guard on the handle, and didn't realize how rare that is on a machete.
For non-firearm home defense you want a short one-handed sword. You want your weapon to be usable in all situations, including tight corners, doorways, stairwells, clutter, with your family nearby etc so a shorter weapon is better. Plus even with a short sword you will almost certainly have the reach advantage over a modern home intruder. And having a free hand means you can open doors, move obstacles, move your family, turn on/off lights, push, grab, use your phone etc. So for those reasons you probably want a short one-handed sword in your main hand and nothing in your offhand. There are some interesting items you could use in the offhand, a blindingly bright flashlight being one of them. Flashlight is probably better than pepper spray - indoors you may spray yourself and the momentary blindness from a flashlight is incapacitating enough for you to use your sword. A buckler is also a great option. You can block blows with it if the intruders are swinging crowbars or bats or something like that at you. And you can use the buckler offensively to smash people too. Caltrops are also an interesting idea. Grab a jar of them in your offhand and throw them on the floor near the intruders. As for the sword, you want a cutting-specialized sword that still has thrusting capacity. Your opponents will be unarmored and wielding shorter weapons than you - exactly the kind of target that cutting swords excel against. Hand protection is nice in case you end up parrying a crowbar or club. You want a nimble weapon for quicker strikes/recovery. And you don't need a lot of heft behind the cut. A machete is meant to hew through thick vines and branches for which it needs heft in the blade, but this makes it slower and less nimble (and more axe-like). You don't want this type of weapon. If your opponents were wearing thick layers of cloth armor then you might need the extra cutting capacity that heft gives you, but modern clothes are so thin that this is not an issue. The speed and nimbleness you gain from a lighter blade is far more of an advantage. Another factor that Shad mentioned is intimidation. Any sword will be intimidating. A lighter and more nimble weapon can be swung around quickly to further intimidate. And I would argue certain blade shapes are more intimidating, for example the clipped point of a messer. It just LOOKS wicked sharp and you can't help but imagine that point puncturing you when you see it. There is also the panic factor. In a home defense situation you will be freaking out. You will be thinking about so many things other than your technique. You are likely to end up swinging your sword in a panic as if it were a stick because this is the natural human response when threatened. So if you're going to end up swinging and not thrusting anyway, you might as well have a sword suited to that purpose. So I'd say a gladius/wakizashi are solid choices, but you're slightly better off with a short messer/dusack/cuttoe/hanger/cutlass/hunting sword due to hand protection. The gladius is also slightly more thrust-oriented and less cut-oriented than these other swords. Its wicked sharp tip does have a lot of intimidation value though.
Wow... i didnt expect that, but i am very happy with your video because my home defense weapons are a Coldsteel Asegai (Zulu short spear) and a United Cutlery Gladius like yours, looks like i made the right choice when i bought it. (i bought it 2020) I totally love it.
Take a look at the uses of the kukri. They are great for defense and offense, if trained. They are also great in the kitchen. And if careful, shaving yourself, or your enemy.
Boy, go get my field knife! Uhhayhay
@@DoctorProph3t Time to earn your do. Your hairdo that is uhhayhay
not as good at trusting tho
Surprisingly affordable to get a proper traditional kukri as well, the kukris from Himalayan Imports are made in Nepal and you can get most of them for under 200 USD and they are made by the same people who use them as tools everyday. Made to be used, not wallhanger decorations.
Scholagladiatoria spoke about a similar concept and I do believe that daggers would be a good answer or a short sword of some kind that way it can be taken anywhere with ease (in and out of the car, narrow places placed in small containers for weapons checkpoints). You can also use them for dueling, they have the capability to take things off if necessary (some people could be whacked out on some potent things and don’t go down easily) and they are more maneuverable for even the most ignorant of users.
best weapon for modern day self defense is Cold Steel's Espada XL this is is the real shit
@@KroM234 I prefer a fixed blade that I can carry OUTSIDE of my pants. No sense in getting a second bed at the ICU because the knife opened a little closer to me that I wanted it to.
@@egyptwns89_26 I had the same concern about this kind of knives, but this lock system is just beyond doubt. But I admit that the feel is hard to get around...
Daggers provide too little defensive value
@@tada-kun982 While I can agree with you, I also think that a short sword (a gladius or a kodachi for example) would also fight the bill. People wouldn’t be able to defend themselves in an alleyway or a hallway in their homes with a full sized sword (it would be too narrow to pull off a single swing) so a short sword or dagger would be better suited. Personally I do prefer arming swords but I welcome the daggers or short swords. This is how I came to the conclusion.
Machetes are super underrated. Look up the Cuban war of independence. Cubans defeated the Spaniards using machetes and charging the Spanish army on horseback. Most Cubans didn’t have muskets and so they mostly did cavalry charges with machetes.
I have been studying self defense for many decades. I do not feel a weapon that needs to be swung is a good option because it requires skill and strength. I feel that for personal self defense for law abiding citizens at home, a pointed, stabbing weapon is the way to go. I have a 1800s French 20 inch needle pointed rifle bayonet which would be my recommendation in self defense. It can be used in any close proximity encounter with one hand, or two (double edges are not sharpened). With a weapon like this, the attacker cannot block anything because any point of contact will cause severe injury, and stop the attack.
The Kukri & Tomahawk have always been a favorite of mine, both are tools & a necessity for life in the Bush.
This is the trick. The only medieval weapons you are likely to use in the modern day are the ones that happen to be useful tools -- they are the only ones you'd ever have on you. Swords are dedicated weapons... If you want a dedicated weapon in the modern age you pick up a gun. Like a civilized person.
he doesn't even use it right... making this a biased review.
how is a tomahawk a basic necessary modern tool in a bush? WTF xD
@@WerewolfMaster First of all, he didn't say it was basic or modern. Second I guess you'd have to leave mom's basement to find out.
@@WerewolfMaster how is a tomahawk necessary in the bush? (THE bush is aussie for the woods or the wilderness etc) asking that simply proves you have no idea..
Saber . You can also go full cavalry on them if you roll down the window
As an American I obviously carry a gun! as an Alaskan. I obviously carry more than one gun at a time, but I also carry a small pocket knife for regular things but my blade of choice for self-defense is an old hickory 7 1/2 inch meat cleaver! who loves you baby. 😘
Loved the idea of tools for self defense! Do a video about it !
Anyone else want an entire video of Shad testing his collection against various objects, like the last 7 minutes of this?
Yes
I'm a big fan of a Self-Defense Mag Light. IE a really bright STICK. It's solid construction provides for both solid striking, ability to block bladed weapons, and its rounded bulb like end is very mace like. They're also quite hefty, so plenty of "power" behind them. Also they're a common tool a lot of people will have on hand.
Cloud Defensive have some pretty overenginerded weapons flashlights, heavier, sturdier, a tad more expensive than surefire or streamlight. Also if you want a legally owned IED you can buy yourself a cheapo O-Light.
The proper way to hold those is to hold the bulb end where the light is and strike with the rear of the flashlight You can even hold it next to your head to use the light most efectively and it is already in a ready to strike position That is how Cops use flashlights because the Bulb end LOOKS like a Mace, But it is the lightest part of the Light and using that end would only break your flashlight wile DECREASING the effectiveness of the weapon
Big, heavy, can't go in a pocket. 4/10
why would you carry one in broad daylight?
@@mrii114The sun will go down later, also if you're a mechanic or do other jobs, they can be quite handy even in daytime.
Always remember, a Machete is an Axe pretending to be a sword.
Check out the Cold Steel Gladius Machete. the handle made out of polymer, so it's quite light, it has a vicious point and of course it chops nicely. Would be my go-to option for self defence with a bladed weapon.
I've been after one for a while but they're as rare as hens teeth. Can't find one in stock anywhere. I've made do with the Cold Steel Light Gladius for now but will snap one up when/if they become available.