Ukraine War: Chance of Russia launching a nuclear attack could grow

Liberating people by nuking them. Wonderful plan.

No wonder the American "very stable genius" called Putin "brilliant".

We are fucked

everything is putin's fault ofc... never look in the mirror. Just assume putin invade ukraine for fun and nukes because salty of NATO 😂. RIP critical thinking ☠️☠️

No, USA is gonna attack 10 different countries in the past 30 years for OIL and $ while they are bombarding, killing and molesting innocent people.

I think Russia targeted both of the nord streams for two reasons. 1. A show of force. Now, no matter how nasty the winter gets and no matter how an utter emergency might allow for payment of gas in rubles to be made despite the sanctions it cannot happen now. 2. And more importantly, they have targeted essential infrastructure as a way to provoke the other side into war. Notice how the choice was made to do this in Denmark's territorial waters? Denmark isn't in Nato, so Russia can do their damage without immediate retribution but do it in a manner that threatens Europeans enough it might be provoked. Putin is itching for a fight, any justification and since what he's done so far isn't getting a rise out of Nato that he'd hoped for he's targeting non nato members in hopes they'll need to be defended anyway.

@@xzaviayifu3581 Excellent point. However, Denmark IS in nato...

@@xzaviayifu3581 lol confidently incorrect my boy

@@xzaviayifu3581 Except there is one massive logical hole in your argument. Why would Russia blow up it's own pipeline when it can just close the shutoff valves indefinitely and achieve the same result? Also it's just too convenient that a competing pipeline under NATO control serving the SAME AREAS NS1 and 2 serve opened the very same day NS1 and 2 were destroyed. I think the US did it. And i believe this because it's something Biden said he would do, and the US had two different opportunities to plant explosives on the pipes before the day they exploded. The first would've been during a naval exercise in the area earlier this year and the second would've been just a couple of weeks ago when the USS Kearsarge sailed through the area.

@@xzaviayifu3581 nice dreams

Exactly

@@BocaoZ i wouldnt say that.. the wrong thing happening in the past doesnt make it right now.

@@megaflux7144 whether it is right or wrong, just or fair, westerners accepted that vote. So the argument could be made, in favour of Putin, why is theirs (Kosovo’s) accepted and ours not?

Not to mention that USA recognizes Taiwan meanwhile UN officials recognized only China and Taiwan is considered a part of China . But west always recognizes what suits them . This hypocrisy is the worst .

It was russias to begin with . They speak Russian in them parts. Your laws are invalid

it makes no sense to send hundreds of thousands of soldiers into an area that will allegedly be targeted with nuclear weapons. Russia, the first fascist nation that required to mobilize due to " a peace keeping mission"

i quess a russian left a comment here and got deleted

Bluff or not… the REAL question 🙋‍♀️ is… CAN PUTIN WIN without using NUKES… A) if YES then no need for nukes. B) if NO then … will NUKES 💣 MAKE HIM WIN ??? … MAYBE 🤔. So far the MISSILE TECH OF THE WEST is just too powerful for Russia 🇷🇺 infantry, armor, artillery, and air force… EVERYTHING is killed by MISSILES… Personally, PUTIN CAN WIN economically via gas ⛽️ and food 🍱 supplies… This WINTER 🥶 will be the deciding FACTOR if NUKE IS NECESSARY. BIBLE PROPHECY says NUKE BOMB 💣 WILL FLY… but not say why??? 😳

Who said anything about using nuclear weapons in Ukraine? They could use it anywhere in the world. Pick any city in Europe

We are making the mistake of trusting Putin to be a rational actor.... again. Right now, our world is at the mercy of one man's pride

@@mutopz ya then Moscow gets nuked smart

@@mutopz Learn the difference between tactical and strategic nuclear weapons.

I think people are just getting more concerned about the threats now since Putin is getting more desperate and angry, but I still think he’s bluffing, since he can’t be sure that Ukraine doesn’t have nukes hidden, and he is at least smart enough to understand that nato wouldn’t be too happy if he did that. He would also loose friends, like china.

Thats the spirit!

Keep calm and buy a kettle

We'll get to play fallout in real life.

Ask NATO to leave Ukraine and there will be no nuclear threat

@@flesz_ Nato already said it doesn't want a confertation with Russia

@@frozenlama23 they can't just pour weapons to Ukraine and try to avoid confrontation

@@flesz_ yes they can natos military is not in Ukraine

@@flesz_ it's called war business how els do u think the us military makes it's money lol

Fallout from tactical nukes is fairly minimal tbh, depending on how many are deployed it probably won't be a problem

@@johnrussell3961 better dead than red

@@johnrussell3961 Better to live in M💀SC💀W ? Live with pale little G💀llum and his 💀ligarch 💀rcs?

@@shanecoleman5952 a nuke is a nuke

@@dublinairportplanes No it isn't.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

They voted by mail in philthydelphia.

cos the long range ones dont work or even exist every one launched into space was dumped in the ocean & rendered inert ( core was f***** basically )yet thats not a question ?! tac nukes the ones used in artillery & tanks in the gulf & afghan ,arent tacs as such but do get dipped in depleted nuclear material ,cant nuke an oil rich country then steal the oil cos its all on fire n stuff :P

Shut the f*ck up mate, that's not a risk we can afford to take, nuclear war would annihilate our agriculture and transportation, the survivors would starve to death if not die from Radiation or untreated injuries.

Is Putins Kremlin propaganda the real truth then 😉? Russia is trying to destroy Ukrainian culture and people for the last 500 years and they cant and will never succeed. Its like a finger trap, the harder they try the harder we will resist. Cant conquer 44 million people believe me. Or give me 1 example at least

Dont believe the media. They talk a lot about it but the chance is still low. The thing is that it shouldnt have been a chance at all.

@E KL At this point the Ukrainians are just throwing men into the meat grinder for nothing. They can't win and they are just drawing out the inevitable.

they will not fight and turn themselves in first opportunity they have.

More young men have left Russia to avoid the draft than voted in their rigged elections.

I feel no sympathy for them. A whole lot of them were supporting the war, displaying their “Z” symbols on stickers they bought for their vehicles and acting hard AF online. Then it becomes a bit too real for them and they flee the country………That’s not gonna work for them, because Russia is now setting up draft centres on the borders of the counties they’re fleeing too 😂😂😂😂. More orcs for the meat grinder, means more food for hungry Ukrainian doggos…….Ukrainian sunflowers are gonna be massive next year with all that free orc fertiliser.

True. Locals in those areas out of fear for the safety of their families often do not express their true opinion about the actions of russia in public. The territory can pass to the russian hands in the near future and they can be reminded of what they have told and tortured to this. So they say just little: -WE want peace.

Hello love from India to Ukraine 🇮🇳❤️

No

Saliva Urine 🇺🇦 the brave evacuators of Marupol.

Russia should be thrown out. They are not much different from North Korea at this point.

The USA have vetoed any attempt to enforce the 1948 UN resolution on Palestine. The west have no right to be arbiters of when the veto is acceptable, They have abused it already.

@@Chuck_N0rris so does USA

@@Chuck_N0rris if they were thrown out it would prove that that the UN is a failure (I mean it already is considering it has never prevented a war) also it would lose global credibility (sane reason why the US doesn’t leave it despite it again being useless)

Given that Putin is behaving rationally still. I wont say that invading Ukraine was rational. The chance of nukes are low but it is a chance.

He can't lose. He would rather perish in raining nuclear bombs than admit defeat. He has nothing to lose at this point.

NATO should think more than twice that Russia alone can nuke the entire NATO countries. Russia is not going down alone if attacked by NATO.

And USA and Europe will be raining nukes from all directions.

the US isn’t going to rain nuclear bombs on Russia. the minute Russia detects the bombs being launched, they would launch dozens of their own. they have a big red button too. the US won’t risk that. this isn’t a movie lmao

NATO is too scared of all out war but Russia is practically starting all out war gonna have to this now or risk being in a apocalypse Russia needs to destroyed if they do this there is no turning back if he does launch nukes on Ukraine

Tylko dwa chuje???

As this usa and Europe did in Iraq and Afghanistan. Russia might learned from like usa killied innocent Muslims

My wife's family hails from Luhansk. Her father evacuated to Russia, and is now in the city of Luhansk. His house has been occupied by Russians and they have no plans to leave it. However, he is staunchly pro-Russian and expects the LPR to hand him his house back.

@@LemmingOverlord People being staunchly pro-Russian or staunchly Pro-Ukrainian living in the same region should be able to respect each other's nationalities. It fails when the government in a neighboring country starts stirring up hatred and division with a view to justifiable occupation which results in the national government doing the same that local unity totally collapses :(

D33p 🤡

He keeps mentioning them and he only cares about himself and how he looks the world now sees him and his army as a paper tiger will he do something really really stupid

This is sky news. Can't expect anything else from the brainwashed people in the comments

Finally someone who actually knows wtf is going on here

@@Journal_Haris yep

👌🏼

That was never on the cards. Lithuania is closer to Moscow, on its border and has been a NATO member for 20 years. If NATO wanted nukes that close, they could done it 20 years ago. Ukraine is irrelevant from that perspective.

Hope so to much population in the world

I didn't

@@rajveerkanojiya2985 maybe tomorrow

Same. The Ukrainian government is so stupid and ideological that it's pretty much guaranteed that eventually they will do something stupid enough that it gets them nuked.

It is a good strategy. Any territory Ukraine loses and can't take back immediately essentially becomes lost forever to them lest they get erased from existence for trying to retake it.

Either way it means Ukraine can't shell them with artillery with impunity again lest they risk nuclear annihilation.

don´t be a coward or russian agent. Ukraine will prevail and Putins regime will fall soon. Then the world will be a much better place.

Putin only gives ultimatums, he has never negotiated. They literally said at the UN that more annexations are likely to happen in the future. He needs to be stopped now.Russia is on the wrong side of the lend lease this time, it helped them in WW2, now it will work against them.

Don't count on negotiations

I’m all for it but putin wants negotiations to be what he wants out of it.

Even if they did,would putin stop there?

@@devinepegasus5532 It's a possibility but it gives NATO time to prepare for the worst

@@_Richard_F___ I don't think it's about the land, he wants to control the government!

They are still searching through the ruined land. Once they are done, the will liberate more ruined land.

Bruh

In your dreams Kremlin gremlin