Why Does Changing Just One Proton Change an Element?

2024 ж. 19 Мам.
310 343 Рет қаралды

The first 500 people to use this link and code ARVIN25 will get 25% off their first subscription with Soylent: bit.ly/3U51qdK
*NOTE - Erwin Schrodinger was Austrian-Irish, not Australian-Irish. We goofed in editing. Apologies to our proud Austrian viewers! And to our Australian audience, as much as you'd like to claim him, I'm afraid he belongs to a different continent.
TALK TO ME on Patreon
/ arvinash
REFERENCES
Origin of all elements: • The Surprising Origin ...
How Quantum Mechanics predicts electron structure: • The Surprising Origin ...
How entropy drives all events: • The Startling Reason E...
WHY IS SODIUM A METAL BUT ARGON IS A GAS?
Electron configuration determines this. Sodium atoms can form metallic bond because the positively charge cation K+ forms an electrostatic attraction with the delocalized electrons from the outer shell. Argon cannot form such bonds because there is no delocalized electron nor cation formed, since the electron structure of the atom is already stable.
CHAPTERS
0:00 Adding or subtracting one proton: drastic change
1:58 The simple answer
3:00 Soylent is best tasting
4:07 Why are elements not classified by electrons?
5:35 Number of protons can change, but not in chemistry
6:07 Why proton count is used to classify elements
6:50 Why are there orbitals and electron shells in atoms?
9:01 How chemistry works: all about energy
12:24 Why aren't all elements Noble elements?
SUMMARY
Why does changing just one proton in the nucleus of an atom make a different element? How can a single proton make such a huge difference in an element’s properties?
The simple answer is: The number of protons determines the number of electrons the atom needs in order to be neutral. The number and configuration of the electrons of an atom determines its chemical properties. So since the number of electrons is determined by the number of protons, changing even just proton will change an element's chemical properties.
If so, why don’t we classify elements based on their number of electrons instead of protons? The reason is because electron numbers for most atoms, can be changed by taking on or giving away electrons to and from other atoms. This is the basis of chemistry. But the change in electrons does not affect the element's essential nature. It still retains its atomic properties.
But the number of protons never changes for most elements. It remains the same because protons cannot be exchanged with other atoms like electrons can in chemical reactions. So the proton count of an element does not change in chemical reactions. This proton number, in turn, determines the number of electrons the atom needs to be neutral. And that in turn, determines the behavior of the atom when it interacts with other atoms chemically, i.e., the bonds it can form. And this determines both its chemical and physical properties.
The proton number determines the propensity of that element to keep, give away, or share its outermost electrons with other atoms.
Electrons in the outermost shell of an atom determine its chemical properties. Why are there different electron shells? Atoms and molecules tend to favor the state with the lowest potential energy, because of the second law of thermodynamics - the law of entropy.
Solving the Schrodinger equation shows how the energies of the electrons in any given atom will be distributed in its ground state. When we solve it, we find that electrons are distributed in orbitals and shells around the nucleus.
An orbital can contain only a maximum two electrons due to the Pauli exclusion principle. The Schrodinger equation shows that as the number of electrons increases in an atom, they occupy different energy levels or shells around its nucleus. These shells can only accommodate a maximum of a fixed number of electrons. These numbers are 2, 10, 18, 36, 54, 86.
So for the few elements that have exactly these protons numbers, they will have the precise number of electrons that make their atomic structure energetically stable. Consequently, they will not have the propensity to take on or lose any of their electrons to other atoms. These are the Noble elements.
Chemistry works by elements trading electrons to form neutrally charged systems that are more energetically favorable, than the elements on their own. Proton number is key because it is the main factor in determining what number of electrons an element would prefer. It boils down to energy and charge conservation.
#protons
#elements
One could ask, why aren’t all elements noble elements. Why didn’t nature make all elements stable? The reason is that elements were formed in fusion reactions within the cores of stars or star processes. The fusion process results in nuclei with all kinds of different numbers of protons, not just the noble elements. Fusion is a nuclear process that just makes stable nucle, not a chemical process that optimizes electron shell stability.

Пікірлер
  • Many thanks to our sponsor, Soylent. IMO, it's the best tasting! The first 500 people to use this link and code ARVIN25 will get 25% off their first subscription with Soylent: bit.ly/3U51qdK

    @ArvinAsh@ArvinAshАй бұрын
    • Sponsored by, “Soylent” Green….. “Hey what!?”

      @surrealsurrealism@surrealsurrealismАй бұрын
    • Thanks help for exam !!!!

      @user-jq8rt2ru3t@user-jq8rt2ru3tАй бұрын
    • ❤❤❤

      @UltimateAlienX@UltimateAlienXАй бұрын
    • @@surrealsurrealism Yes, the green is my favorite

      @robertarnold9815@robertarnold9815Ай бұрын
    • @@robertarnold9815 😂

      @surrealsurrealism@surrealsurrealismАй бұрын
  • I think what I like most about your channel is that you assume we know the basic concepts of what you’re talking about, so you only mention them to give context and then move on to the actual information. It’s so nice to hear from a science educator that knows the level of knowledge their audience has

    @ImmortalLemon@ImmortalLemon25 күн бұрын
  • “Soylent green is made of people!”

    @nunyabitnezz2802@nunyabitnezz2802Ай бұрын
    • with just one proton change

      @gyrofrank@gyrofrank28 күн бұрын
    • Haha was searching for this comment 😆

      @vinayk7@vinayk726 күн бұрын
    • Laboratory food on steroids 😅

      @ronvosick8253@ronvosick825326 күн бұрын
    • And shockingly, people taste just like chicken.

      @etsequentia6765@etsequentia676525 күн бұрын
    • I really hope that they're oblivious. "It has soy, you can drink it on lent." Then they're like "Why do people keep screaming at us that Soylent Green is people!?"

      @HarryHeck2020@HarryHeck202025 күн бұрын
  • Absolutely great video. At 64 years old this engineer never gets tired of learning new science.

    @kerrynewman1221@kerrynewman1221Ай бұрын
    • Same here. Mechanical engineer in the process of retiring. I learned the fundamentals in chemistry in college, as we all did, but there were always some things I didn't quite grasp . This video helped clarify a few things. Very helpful.

      @Beerbatter1962@Beerbatter1962Ай бұрын
    • I dunno, shouldn't everyone pretty much already learn this in high school or even middle school chemistry?

      @asdfasdfasdf1218@asdfasdfasdf121827 күн бұрын
    • ​@@asdfasdfasdf1218 Not the quantum mechanics part, I don't think.

      @benj1008@benj100826 күн бұрын
    • @@benj1008 they wouldn't show the equations for the hydrogen atom electron orbitals that's for sure, but they would at least say the same "qm explains it... as for exactly how, ask that another time" kind of thing probably.

      @asdfasdfasdf1218@asdfasdfasdf121826 күн бұрын
    • Then you guys should search for Peter and Pete and"water is not h20"

      @Mike_Greene@Mike_Greene26 күн бұрын
  • Has nobody seen the classic old movie Soylent Green???

    @dermotthompson2115@dermotthompson2115Ай бұрын
    • It's people!!!

      @aMartianSpy@aMartianSpyАй бұрын
    • Canibal fast food

      @alexandretorres5087@alexandretorres5087Ай бұрын
    • @@aMartianSpy Spoiler Alert !

      @jimmyzhao2673@jimmyzhao2673Ай бұрын
    • Isn't that the movie about the uncle of our fearless leader?

      @Commenter_42@Commenter_42Ай бұрын
    • Was wondering the same thing. Strange choice of name from this company.

      @richardfrenette6648@richardfrenette6648Ай бұрын
  • Brilliantly explained. However, this only partially answers the question. The "why" goes much deeper for me, where lies the code that dictates the behavior of the element when changing its configuration? Why is it what it is? I guess we have to accept the old saying: because it is what it is. At least for now. Let's suppose there is an island of stability for superheavy elements. Could we predict their behavior, or would we need to wait for nature to show us how they behave? We don't even know if this island exists, let alone make such predictions. To me, this just demonstrates how precarious our illusory knowledge of everything is. Don't get me wrong, we have come a long way and made sensational discoveries, but our progress is small compared to the grand scheme of the universe. At least, that's how it seems to me, or maybe my "whys" aren't good questions. I hope I have been clear. Excellent content, as always.

    @bhm19@bhm19Ай бұрын
    • Exactly and well noticed. Science has not an answer (yet) for the question why an element changes its behavior, else one could predict the behavior of ANY chemical reaction without having to resort to experiments. With such a knowledge one could predict and explain i.e. why mercury is fluid at room temperature even if this element would be still unknown.

      @edus9636@edus963627 күн бұрын
  • When I was a young chemistry student there was a simple rule to predict the tendency of an atom to acquire or give electrons : the rule of the "8 electrons outer shell ". Every element tends to complete this shell of 8 electrons: a) acquiring the missing electrons . b) giving the exceeding electrons. c) sharing electons with other atoms. Later I understood that at the basis for this there were reasons concerning energy and stabiity. However this rule works pretty well and I always wandered why it was sufficient considering just 8 electons instead of the entire electronic configuration.

    @vitovittucci9801@vitovittucci980127 күн бұрын
    • isnt that a high school thing ?

      @zouinahadjsabri@zouinahadjsabri25 күн бұрын
    • @@zouinahadjsabri High school and 1° year of university

      @vitovittucci9801@vitovittucci980125 күн бұрын
    • ​@@zouinahadjsabri Kind of? 😅

      @ivoryas1696@ivoryas169625 күн бұрын
    • note that orbitals form shells. the first shell has 2x e-, the next shell has 8x e-......then it goes something like 8, 18, 32....

      @zaneenaz4962@zaneenaz496225 күн бұрын
    • That's called Octet configuration..

      @adinalineplays9327@adinalineplays932725 күн бұрын
  • One of the best videos Arvin has produced. Helped by the background, irrelevant, music being less obtrusive. Thank you.

    @55north17@55north17Ай бұрын
    • How does arvin make these animation like at 4:43.what software does he use?

      @notverycalm@notverycalm29 күн бұрын
    • ​@@notverycalm Maybe blender? 😅

      @ivoryas1696@ivoryas169625 күн бұрын
  • Closing in on a million subscribers. Arvin deserves about 100X that many. Every time I think the internet is a pox on humanity, I remind myself that there are individuals like him making videos like these. Whether you're a serious student of science and math struggling to understand a concept or just someone who is a hobbyist/casually curious about these topics Arvin is your guy. I know it's a cliche now but this youtube channel "is a treasure".

    @jamesedward9306@jamesedward930629 күн бұрын
  • Soylent... i get it as a brand name, but they shouldn't make green. seriously.

    @anothersquid@anothersquidАй бұрын
    • It's mint chocolate!

      @ArvinAsh@ArvinAshАй бұрын
    • ​@@ArvinAshSOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE

      @wbreslin951@wbreslin95128 күн бұрын
    • I thought it was an interesting name choice myself.

      @noliejrjr2922@noliejrjr292228 күн бұрын
    • Soylent Green is vegan friendly cuz its 100% animal* free. *The FDA does not classify Humans as animal products

      @lillyanneserrelio2187@lillyanneserrelio218727 күн бұрын
    • I found it to be a really funny homage. Like yeah absolutely it's meant to make you think of the old movie, but in a haha yeah mystery meal replacement way. It's not like the vegans have an evil secret cannibal cabal lol.

      @SireBab@SireBab16 күн бұрын
  • I love this question, but i love that a video on it was made. We need more videos with these types of questions answered. There are so many seemingly simple questions with profound answers that many of us wish were answered. Thank you!

    @CrashCourse2024@CrashCourse2024Ай бұрын
  • Australia needs more Noble Prize winners, we will take Erwin as one of ours!

    @louieuow@louieuowАй бұрын
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣

      @SmogandBlack@SmogandBlackАй бұрын
    • The Australia/Austria curse strikes again 😂

      @paulmarynissen@paulmarynissenАй бұрын
    • Amazing physicist, less amazing human being.

      @christopherrubicam4474@christopherrubicam4474Ай бұрын
    • As the T-shirt says "There are no kangaroos in Austria".

      @peterskier7574@peterskier757429 күн бұрын
    • I don't think Oz would want him as soon as you looked past his phenomenal science contributions (although had he been living in the UK around 250 years ago you'd've gotten him by default and he'd've had to make his own hammock while he was building Sydney😉)

      @markzambelli@markzambelli29 күн бұрын
  • OK, but you didn't explain what you said you would. You explained what causes them to react; that's highschool chemistry. Why exactly is potassium a soft metal and argon a gas... Why do they have such drastically different forms? Is it's propensity to bond with itself in clumps? How? Crystals? Cohesion? Electromagnetism? Nuclear forces? Why the difference there. Why does light interact with one not the other? Reactions due to valence shells is easy to understand and describe, mate...

    @N3Cr0Ph0b1A@N3Cr0Ph0b1A28 күн бұрын
    • Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! I like Arvin, but as a retired Chem E, this has puzzled me for years. Why are such similar elements from a configuration standpoint so different as I interact with them? What exactly makes this difference? This video was a good chemistry video but failed on the question asked.

      @markb3786@markb378628 күн бұрын
    • I’ve been asking this for years and spent a lot of time in the library and I can’t even find a record of some asking that question. It’s kept me up at night a few times. It seems that nobody knows why and it bothers me that it appears nobody is even trying to figure it out.

      @Leonarco333@Leonarco33327 күн бұрын
    • Exactly. Pretty clickbait video.

      @Therealpro2@Therealpro226 күн бұрын
    • @@markb3786 Quantum stability and bond energy explain 90% of the differences observed. E.g. iodine has a weak covalent bond and melts (evaporates) at a low temperature. Silicon and carbon (diamond) have strong network covalent bonds and are hard and have high melting points. The noble gases are stable electron configurations and don't form bonds under normal conditions, hence are gases. Might be an idea to invest in a new chemistry book!

      @karhukivi@karhukivi25 күн бұрын
    • None of what you describe technically have to do with the title 😂 they all different trends with their own explanations, don’t confuse a short explanation of the periodic table with 3 years of high school chemistry 😂 I mean while you at it ask why he didn’t explain radioactive elements and beta alpha decay 😂 can’t cram everything in one spot, it’s inefficient

      @dreammaker9642@dreammaker964225 күн бұрын
  • "Crikey mate! I can't bloody well tell if that flamin' cat is alive or dead, struth" - Australian Schrodinger, probably. 😁

    @_j_j@_j_jАй бұрын
    • 😂 just noticed it myself as well

      @patricklaenen3468@patricklaenen3468Ай бұрын
    • You call that a cat? THIS is a cat

      @Tom_Quixote@Tom_QuixoteАй бұрын
    • @@Tom_Quixoteyes. Australian cat is 20 feet long, swims, flys, and is highly venomous 😂

      @Whatisthisstupidfinghandle@WhatisthisstupidfinghandleАй бұрын
    • I was gonna comment on this error, but whatever I would've come up with wouldn't top this! 😂

      @McPilch@McPilchАй бұрын
    • Have you seen that clip from Futurama when Shroedinger gets pulled over for speeding ? Very funny

      @Eztoez@EztoezАй бұрын
  • Hi. Great episode. One thing I spotted is that Erwin Schrodinger was not Australian, but Austrian.

    @MercuriusORG@MercuriusORGАй бұрын
    • Let’s not get too picky here! The error is only approximately 1,6 x 10^7 m (or 10’000mi, in Imperial units). So not exactly Heisenberg’s uncertainty, but fairly within the range of measurement errors… But apart from this, Arvin, your videos are great. They help to make people think about physics. And “Physics is everything” (Don Lincoln, Fermilab).

      @ralf-peterberg1083@ralf-peterberg108329 күн бұрын
    • @@ralf-peterberg1083 When taking into account the entire scale of the universe, this error is practically nothing!

      @nickcunningham6344@nickcunningham634429 күн бұрын
    • I had no idea he was also Irish or a serial sexual abuser. Check out his Wikipedia entry. I only went to look up the Irish part. There's a lot about this guy no one discusses, much like his Australian roots

      @johnedwardhills4529@johnedwardhills452929 күн бұрын
    • He's Australian now. Its on the Internet. And that's always reliable !

      @michaelmoorrees3585@michaelmoorrees358529 күн бұрын
    • @@nickcunningham6344 yes you’re absolutely right!

      @ralf-peterberg1083@ralf-peterberg108329 күн бұрын
  • Well explained. I've seen and read about the periodic table and sharing electrons but not the proton distinction before. This was pretty easy to follow and remember. Thanks.

    @windfoil1000@windfoil1000Ай бұрын
  • Brilliant! Story line, visuals, speed, selection of what stays in and what is omitted - everything optimized to help you grasp the topic! Arvin has developed his presentations into a performance of art. If I hadn't subscribed already, I would do so instantly. This makes for very well invested viewing time.

    @marcelma@marcelma26 күн бұрын
  • Arvin, you always ask the best questions! This one I never thought of and its so basic.

    @1024det@1024detАй бұрын
  • Soylent Green is people.

    @Oktokolo@OktokoloАй бұрын
    • Get your stinking paws off of me you damn dirty ape!

      @starventure@starventureАй бұрын
    • 😂😂😂

      @LuisGomez-ex5km@LuisGomez-ex5km27 күн бұрын
  • Hey Avi, just came here to thank you for your standard model video.. I just defended my thesis and now a PhD. Thank you for making it easy to understand, it was very helpful.

    @vivekpatel3752@vivekpatel3752Ай бұрын
  • Hey Arvin, I wish you had also mentioned the “cloud model” of the atom in your video because this solar system model is now outdated and I would have loved to accurately imagine what the atoms look like and what electron position means from the cloud model perspective. Thanks for your amazing videos!

    @oTiSm786@oTiSm786Ай бұрын
    • Like most educational videos, complex ideas start off simple for the beginner. There is nothing in this video for intermediate/advanced students, so the "planet/solar system" model is appropriate. Students need to visualize scientific concepts before they'll remember the basics. Then, you can throw the next level of detail at them.

      @samsonau8205@samsonau8205Ай бұрын
    • You always teach Gen Chem students the bohr model first. It's the most basic way that still helps describe what's going on. It's best to learn it chronilogically just as scientists did. 13:51

      @mcbaggins12@mcbaggins12Ай бұрын
    • @@samsonau8205 An educational concept known as "lie-to-children", as Cohen and Stewart put it and popularised together with Pratchett. The idea being: you teach the student something that's not, strictly speaking, correct. However, it gives the student enough understanding to think about it and eventually realise that it isn't correct. Then, when they start to ask the right questions, you can tell them... Well, another "lie"; a better one (a less wrong one), but one they can digest and really understand, not just memorize.

      @vaclavkrpec2879@vaclavkrpec2879Ай бұрын
    • Models are never entirely accurate, but some models are better at getting certain concepts across than others. When talking about electrons and electron shells, I would argue that the solar system model is more preferred. Helps keep things simple.

      @nickcunningham6344@nickcunningham634429 күн бұрын
    • Learning it with the Bohr model set my learning back a solid year. ​@@mcbaggins12

      @mryellow6918@mryellow691826 күн бұрын
  • Fabulously explained, Arvin! I wish I had the understanding of QM and QFT that I have now back in high school, lol. This video also explains why I prefer to sit in the recliner watching QM videos than mowing 4 acres of yard...I'm in my ideal, low energy state!

    @ryanbaker7404@ryanbaker7404Ай бұрын
  • I've been waiting for such a video a long time.

    @DanteGabriel-lx9bq@DanteGabriel-lx9bqАй бұрын
  • Oh, I've always wondered about this, thanks a lot for the explanation!

    Ай бұрын
  • I just learned so much. Thank you for this awesome video and explanation. It all snapped together in my head for me. Yes

    @yieldtochristian@yieldtochristianАй бұрын
  • You really have some talent in in presenting complex subjects in a condensed, understandable way. Thank you, Arvin.

    @marin4311@marin4311Ай бұрын
    • This one is not so complex. It’s just 1st year chemistry, or maybe even high school level.

      @MrDino1953@MrDino195329 күн бұрын
  • What a nice video for us students that are starting with college chemistry and want to understand (and not memorise) all the stuff we learn. And btw, I do not want to be that guy, but wanna point out that at 7:57 it says that Schrödinger Australian-Irish was. If I’m not wrong, I think he was Austrian-Irish. Thanks for the video!

    @TimTim-gm9pj@TimTim-gm9pjАй бұрын
    • Allegedly he's from both until you take the measurement.

      @Freddisred@FreddisredАй бұрын
    • ​@Freddisred ROTFL...

      @patrickjordan2233@patrickjordan2233Ай бұрын
    • Wait y’all learn this in college?? Wtf? I learned this in 9th grade or 8th bit of both

      @dreammaker9642@dreammaker964225 күн бұрын
    • I mean, I also learned some more basic stuff related to chemistry in HS, but we never got in too deep with Binding Energy, Mass Defect, Strong/ Weak nuclear force, etc. it just was swept under the rug. In college we are being asked for sightly more complex stuff (1st semester), given that first they try to level all the student‘s knowledge so that they all can take lessons together, but still, a lot of topics more related to physics are being skipped because most people will not need that

      @TimTim-gm9pj@TimTim-gm9pj24 күн бұрын
    • @@TimTim-gm9pj in South Africa we learned the basics of chemistry from 8th grade so essentially all this video is saying. Then by 10th grade we learned them further as in the trends and how they work, intramolecular and intermolecular forces. All models of the atom from the raisin pudding to Heisenberg and by 12th grade we finished electro chemistry and organic chemistry and also a butt ton of stoichiometry 😭. In addition to physics cause it was the same subject and two 3 hr exams for finals but we had them every second term basically. The result was I practically learned nothing in Chem I when I got to college in the US and basically only in the end of Chem II did I learn some new stuff mostly just different types of orbitals and pi/sigma bonds which we did cover but not in detail in high school. All this to get to organic Chem I and the fun stopped after chapter 4 😭 my high school teacher did warn me ngl cause Ochem was easy in high school since we only had to do IUPAC naming both ways, as well as knowing all functional groups and if I remember correctly eesterificstion was the only mechanism we learned. Once I started learning proper mechanisms, sterioisomers, chiral centers and naming them properly that was the moment I sat in a lecture hall and wondered where I went wrong cause I was a marine bio major and had no need to learn organic chemistry in that much detail 😭 and that was Ochem I by the end of it I was like wtf more could there possibly be in Ochem II 😭 so to any chem majors out there who hurt you 😭 like talk to me

      @dreammaker9642@dreammaker964224 күн бұрын
  • Professor, you are explaining all these complex questions to us so nice! Many Thanks!

    @Antuan2911@Antuan291129 күн бұрын
  • Just stumbled on this channel. I'm actually quite impressed with the production value. This was great :)

    @Nope-w3c@Nope-w3c26 күн бұрын
  • LOL at 7:53 we find out that Erwin Schroedinger is an AUSTRALIAN physicist 😂

    @patricklaenen3468@patricklaenen3468Ай бұрын
    • Author of the famous Schrödinger's cangaroo thought experiment

      @Tom_Quixote@Tom_QuixoteАй бұрын
    • Yeah! That caught my eye too! LOL Probably some autofill typing error.

      @MindfieIds@MindfieIdsАй бұрын
    • Sorry, missed it editing. Should, of course, be AUSTRIAN.

      @ArvinAsh@ArvinAshАй бұрын
    • And a bit of an irishman. 😂

      @olafborkner@olafborknerАй бұрын
    • Austrish is the technical term 😜

      @johnedwardhills4529@johnedwardhills452929 күн бұрын
  • There are a LOT of concepts of music, frequencies, balance and resonance that can be applied to the atoms properties. If you change a note by 1%.. it does not sound like the original song.. it sounds horrible. But if you change it by 0.5x or 2x it sounds perfect. The notes of music are like the energy levels of electrons where you cannot just go anywhere.. they must have harmony and resonance. If I am not mistaken... This same concept is where color comes from. Because the electrons wave must resonate(in a matter of speaking) with the rest of the electrons.. there are discrete energy levels or the atom will fly apart. When a photon hits an atom..the electron changes energy levelz and when the electron falls back down to the lower energy level, because the electrons levels are discrete... The wavelengths of photos emitted are consistent. This reminds me of pinch harmonics on a guitar. No matter where you create the harmonic it will always be in tune.. it will just have a different frequency still create a stable and harmonized tone that matches the music. It is because the atom or song requires balance of the frequencies that dictate that very minor changes can result in a massively different effect. you can easily change the frequency(number of electrons) greatly but retain a similar effect. This is why atoms with very different amounts of electrons(protons) can have similar properties(same columns of periodic table) while atoms with slightly different number of electrons(protons) have vastly different properties. Music and physics are my favorite.

    @christophermullins7163@christophermullins7163Ай бұрын
    • What an elegant metaphor.

      @paulomartins1008@paulomartins1008Ай бұрын
    • This reminds me of string theory. Lol.

      @ronch550@ronch550Ай бұрын
    • Thank you for that comparison That's really cool The math doesn't lie lol

      @ONEYEDPiRAT@ONEYEDPiRATАй бұрын
    • it's an awesome connection, you can tell why so many scientists like Einstein were hobby musicians!

      @lexinwonderland5741@lexinwonderland5741Ай бұрын
    • @@lexinwonderland5741 🙏🙏

      @christophermullins7163@christophermullins7163Ай бұрын
  • the way you put it is just beautiful and simple. Thanks

    @ReDMooNTVV@ReDMooNTVVАй бұрын
  • Love your videos Arvin thanks for the quality :)

    @sirdiealot53@sirdiealot53Ай бұрын
  • I love how it doesn't give the answer lol

    @Raphael3032@Raphael303223 күн бұрын
    • Now I'm gonna close this video without watching it

      @pulkit935@pulkit93514 күн бұрын
    • @@pulkit935 It will help you understand chemistry at highschool level though

      @DEV-Pandey@DEV-Pandey13 күн бұрын
    • @@DEV-Pandey i already did two years ago

      @pulkit935@pulkit93512 күн бұрын
    • @@pulkit935that isn’t his fault

      @YellowMustard_@YellowMustard_12 күн бұрын
    • @@YellowMustard_ when did I say it is?

      @pulkit935@pulkit93512 күн бұрын
  • As always a fabulous explanation for complicated things

    @khsolo@khsoloАй бұрын
  • Excellent video, as always. I hope to show these videos to my kids when they get older. You make physics and chemistry fun to learn about. There's a lot of young people in America who probably would know more about chemistry and physics from watching one or two of your videos than they would get from 12 years in the public school system.

    @michaelvanburen6010@michaelvanburen6010Ай бұрын
  • At 0:28 what is silicon doing under calcium? Was this generated by ChatGPT? 😂

    @R-ok3cl@R-ok3clАй бұрын
    • Lol what the heck

      @MAD-SKILLZ@MAD-SKILLZАй бұрын
    • Omigosh, good catch. They also have *Sc* listed twice.

      @jimmyzhao2673@jimmyzhao2673Ай бұрын
    • Not only that, but caesium is down as Sc instead of Cs, but it's also a few years out of date as all the elements from 110 to 118 now have actual names, not just the placeholder "Unun.." ones.

      @iantullie@iantullieАй бұрын
  • Just like Dr. Don Lincoln says, "physics is everything".

    @Nightscape_@Nightscape_Ай бұрын
  • the best easy and also complex enought to graphically explain chemistry, thanks.

    @nihil_._sum@nihil_._sumАй бұрын
  • The best presentation on the functions and logic of atomic structure I've ever watched!

    @prototropo@prototropo26 күн бұрын
  • hell i like this dudes intro music

    @UnyieldingDrive4849@UnyieldingDrive4849Ай бұрын
    • Absolutely, so retro.. feels like transported into early 90's..

      @kunalk6014@kunalk6014Ай бұрын
  • I see they have green version of soylent, good

    @TsMunch@TsMunchАй бұрын
    • and suicide boxes with Arvin videos?

      @alexandretorres5087@alexandretorres5087Ай бұрын
    • ahem, you do realize what it's made of, don't you ?

      @jimmyzhao2673@jimmyzhao2673Ай бұрын
  • Glad to know I remember correctly from high school Chemistry! Your Models at 12:00 are the best I've seen so far though! Those would be really nice to have in the classroom for understanding and making molecules, or even just for fun!

    @Firesgone@Firesgone2 күн бұрын
  • Great video as always, glad to help support the channel!

    @Soylent@Soylent27 күн бұрын
    • Much appreciated! Thanks for sponsoring.

      @ArvinAsh@ArvinAsh27 күн бұрын
  • LOL this periodic table at 0:54 is just full of errors. Si for strontium under calcium??? Sc shows a second time but is now caesium😂

    @R-ok3cl@R-ok3clАй бұрын
    • Thanks for that catch. The table is a stock image. We will refrain from using it in the future. Funny enough, nearly all stock images of the periodic table have errors for some reason.

      @ArvinAsh@ArvinAshАй бұрын
    • At a quick guess, in an older stock image, you're probably looking at a "paper town" scenario. In a newer one, laziness or AI.

      @markstyles1246@markstyles1246Ай бұрын
    • @@ArvinAsh it's probably intentional errors to catch people using their stock imagery without permission. "you used a version with errors, and it's clearly ours!"

      @DoctorFungus@DoctorFungusАй бұрын
    • Cesium doesn't look right either.

      @DrDeuteron@DrDeuteronАй бұрын
    • also 110-118 have names now, afaik.

      @DrDeuteron@DrDeuteronАй бұрын
  • SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!!!!!

    @lexinexi-hj7zo@lexinexi-hj7zo29 күн бұрын
  • you're amazing. the way you deliver the knowledge we all know

    @manuelmaturana4573@manuelmaturana4573Ай бұрын
  • Best and clearest explanation that helps bridge the physics-chemistry gap. Thank you so much!

    @elephantheart9988@elephantheart9988Ай бұрын
  • - Greetings, Dr Schrödinger! Sir, you drove too fast AND in the wrong lane. - Come on, Officer. Which claim are you sure of?

    @istvansipos9940@istvansipos9940Ай бұрын
    • Should be Heisenberg

      @jumbopopcorn8979@jumbopopcorn8979Ай бұрын
    • @@jumbopopcorn8979 :- ) Never write pre-coffee jokes about science. Yes, Heisenberg. Uhm... Let's say that Herr Schrödinger was riding shotgun in that car. nice save from me L0L.

      @istvansipos9940@istvansipos9940Ай бұрын
    • @@istvansipos9940 do you think the cat in the trunk is alive?

      @jumbopopcorn8979@jumbopopcorn8979Ай бұрын
    • @@jumbopopcorn8979 the kitty has 8 remaining lives. 7 on extremely cold / hot days

      @istvansipos9940@istvansipos9940Ай бұрын
    • @@jumbopopcorn8979"Officer, the body is the trunk is both alive and dead until you open it."

      @MarshallTheArtist@MarshallTheArtistАй бұрын
  • Thank you so much for answering a question i have been thinking about for a very long time

    @yores@yores29 күн бұрын
  • That wasn't a very satisfying answer.

    @maxanimator9547@maxanimator954728 күн бұрын
    • Agreed. Like of course it comes down to Valence Electrons, we all knew that already, and for that, the elements with similar amounts only behave "drastically different" from eachother, because you're comparing their reactions with different elements. Compare elements with just one proton difference to the same position on the table, the reaction isn't that special. The "complexity" is fully emergent

      @neotronextrem@neotronextrem27 күн бұрын
    • That’s because scientists simply don’t know why anything does anything. At the end of the day the universe is just designed to do things in a certain way

      @TrevoltIV@TrevoltIV26 күн бұрын
    • @@TrevoltIV I too wish we had a theory of everything but having simple non scalable models as to locally approximate reality in simpler ways is neat too

      @maxanimator9547@maxanimator954726 күн бұрын
    • @@maxanimator9547 We cannot have a theory of everything because the theory of everything would need to be explained itself. At some point or another you hit a blank wall where the only answer is God

      @TrevoltIV@TrevoltIV25 күн бұрын
    • Yep it isn't a satisfactory answer.

      @amethyst5619@amethyst561923 күн бұрын
  • Could you use the modern names of the elements? "Potassium" is actually Kalium, "Sodium" is actually Natrium etc.

    @Breakfast_of_Champions@Breakfast_of_ChampionsАй бұрын
    • What the fuck

      @Sekhmmett@SekhmmettАй бұрын
  • Excellent video, it gave me a better understanding on this subject!

    @yaelbj@yaelbj26 күн бұрын
  • Excelent video. I just always just accepted it was the how atoms and molecules bond. But it always tripped me out with the exact example you gave. The fact that a gas goes to a metal with one proton is wild.

    @Raven319s@Raven319s24 күн бұрын
  • An excellent video. I've been looking for an explanation like this for a while.

    @TKN21@TKN2129 күн бұрын
  • Woohoo! Another Arvin Ash video!!!! Thanks Arvin.

    @willarn1@willarn1Ай бұрын
  • Some of the best videos to show your kids if you wish for them to have a profound understanding of reality. Thank you Arvin.

    @deepghetto8968@deepghetto896828 күн бұрын
  • I've been wondering about this for so long! I already knew most of this info, but I've never seen it presented this way before. :)

    @Wilfoe@Wilfoe26 күн бұрын
    • Glad it was helpful!

      @ArvinAsh@ArvinAsh26 күн бұрын
  • Overall is good. Your simplicity refreshed my basic knowledge that my shs teacher didn't teach me about, which left me in utter confusion about the entire atomic-sub world. I honestly thought you should explain the beta/alpha decay stuff further or mention the nuclear transmutation. I insist on your next video cuz I love how you explain things, thank you.

    @kinanthitarasalwahita8357@kinanthitarasalwahita835722 сағат бұрын
  • Excellent video, one of the best on this channel

    @tomrawlins8214@tomrawlins821428 күн бұрын
  • The question posed in the title of this video immediately caught my attention. Fascinating subject.

    @wesleywashington1251@wesleywashington125127 күн бұрын
  • It was such an incredible experience watching this video. I wish such high quality material was available in other languages.

    @filipenicoli_@filipenicoli_Ай бұрын
  • Thank you so much, because I have been thinking of this same question for a long time. But now I understood clearly why the elements are so different. KZhead channels like this help me to understand and study science better! 🙂👍

    @m.senthilkumar2585@m.senthilkumar258524 күн бұрын
  • This video is incredibly informative.

    @AircraftFTW@AircraftFTW26 күн бұрын
  • Great video Arvin! As a chemist (this don't affect the content of the video) I saw that an old periodic table was shown since we now have named atoms up to element 118 Og

    @PATRIK67KALLBACK@PATRIK67KALLBACK29 күн бұрын
  • I learned this 8-9 years ago forgot most of it but you made me remember a lot.

    @extremeweirdness1528@extremeweirdness152825 күн бұрын
  • This video sums up why I subscribed so long ago. ty ty great vid

    @ruellerz@ruellerz17 күн бұрын
  • Beautiful explanation, thankyou 🙌

    @jeffpearce8748@jeffpearce874829 күн бұрын
  • Wow! That was a brilliant explanation! Thank you, I am going to subscribe to your channel!

    @MEGAMIGA@MEGAMIGAАй бұрын
  • Great video! I find this so fascinating

    @berylman@berylman29 күн бұрын
  • this is such an interesting video.. totally loved this.. besides many others ofcourse)

    @Ritziey@Ritziey28 күн бұрын
  • Excellent take professor Ash!

    @misterlau5246@misterlau524629 күн бұрын
  • Can you do a follow up that focuses on the physical properties and why are they so different with one proton (e.g. melting point, vapor point, colour etc) ?

    @Craznar@CraznarАй бұрын
  • Thank you, thank you, thank you Arvin! ❤ I've asked this question since highschool. Even throughout college, profs wouldn't give a straight answer.

    @jlynec@jlynec27 күн бұрын
    • I hear you. In high school, i always got circular answers too.

      @ArvinAsh@ArvinAsh27 күн бұрын
  • Thanks for this very informative video!

    @hanks.9833@hanks.9833Ай бұрын
  • Amazing well explained video

    @lukedowneslukedownes5900@lukedowneslukedownes5900Ай бұрын
  • Dude thank you for always making such awesome science videos. You, Sabine and Matt at PBS Spacetime make the science trifecta! This topic in particular was always something I was curious about and you've explained it so clearly that now I can go teach my son and pretend that I knew it all along lol

    @nerdmelon3406@nerdmelon3406Ай бұрын
    • Nice! He's going to be amazed at you!

      @ArvinAsh@ArvinAshАй бұрын
    • What's the problem with just learning about it?

      @wesleywashington1251@wesleywashington125127 күн бұрын
    • @@wesleywashington1251 I didn’t say that I couldn’t but thanks for the helpful suggestion

      @nerdmelon3406@nerdmelon340627 күн бұрын
  • Very good and enjoyable, as always... 😊😊😊

    @SmogandBlack@SmogandBlackАй бұрын
  • I literally searched this same question in quora yesterday, word by word. I am feeling 😱

    @namitakalita6837@namitakalita683729 күн бұрын
  • I’m amazed at how much you packed into a short video

    @ShaneH42@ShaneH42Ай бұрын
  • As a chemist, nothing here was really new to me, but it was still interesting to see it beeing explained by a physicist. Great video and explanation! :D

    @Emma-ol3ed@Emma-ol3ed26 күн бұрын
  • When, during novae and super novae, heavier atoms were formed they would be ranbdomly scattered across space. The question I have - and perhaps someone can provide an answer - HOW, why and in what phase of the process they clumped together to finally 'look like ores' that we find across earth. I suppose this could have been during the accretion disk phase, but still remains the why and how? What mechanism?

    @johnmolenaar3810@johnmolenaar3810Ай бұрын
    • I also have the same question What i concluded is that, the particles in a protoplanetary gas disc need not be evenly distributed or homogenously mixed. Similar to how the salinity of various parts of Earth's ocean is different even after being a single water body.. so considering the huge size of the star, its possible to get kilometre sized clumps that form the mineral deposits on Earth or any other planet or moon or asteroid

      @iamamazingist@iamamazingistАй бұрын
  • Great video Arvin

    @finbeats@finbeats29 күн бұрын
  • Brilliant video about the electrons

    @Carty1987@Carty19873 күн бұрын
  • A master's presentation! Thank you.

    @2945antonio@2945antonio29 күн бұрын
  • Always curious about this fact. Thanks!!! 😎

    @johnnyrocketed2225@johnnyrocketed222515 сағат бұрын
  • Great video, thanks

    @toms-cubes-and-games@toms-cubes-and-games6 күн бұрын
  • This is a great video. It will help any beginning Chemistry Student understand what's going on. [[ It would be nice to distinguished between Ionic and Covalent bonds. ]]

    @caseyleedom6771@caseyleedom6771Ай бұрын
    • Ionic: Gimme all you got, You complete me Covalent: Sharing is caring. Share once, share twice, share three times!

      @starventure@starventureАй бұрын
  • Another great explanation!

    @JohannY3@JohannY329 күн бұрын
  • I never knew how much I didn’t know about chemistry. It’s so obvious and easy if you think about it but I just couldn’t think of it before. Thank you so much this video was really well explained and visualized. I just have one more question. What about the elements above Fe which aren’t Noble Elements? How did they Form and why aren’t they all noble elements ?

    @Musi_012@Musi_01226 күн бұрын
  • Plz more on the schrödinger equation and why/how it predicts the number of electrons for the different shells. And maybe also something about how the equation predicts the shape of the orbitals 🙏

    @arcobrunner1979@arcobrunner1979Ай бұрын
  • the animations are rly good!

    @emiledestructeur@emiledestructeur28 күн бұрын
  • This is the best explanation that I have ever received. Thanks a lot. Now I am also a chemist

    @zdenekvalek1538@zdenekvalek153827 күн бұрын
  • Ah yes.. A new Arvin Ash. 😊 Real science vids that I can understand and trust. No clickbait. 😁

    @dougieh9676@dougieh967627 күн бұрын
  • Great explanation!

    @brunorhagalcus6132@brunorhagalcus613227 күн бұрын
  • This video was just brilliant

    @madkent99@madkent9912 күн бұрын
  • I just had a chemistry test a few days ago and it’s nice to confirm what I learned through this video

    @_lod@_lod25 күн бұрын
  • I've been thinking about this for years. Thank you for addressing this topic. Too bad the alchemists never knew what really makes up everything.

    @ronch550@ronch550Ай бұрын
  • I wish my chemistry lessons back in the day were this interesting/insightfull and telling about the releation phisics -> chemistry :) I wouldn't had to guess/discover it on my own :)

    @monstergdc@monstergdcАй бұрын
  • Absolutely fantastic video answering long awaited questions! Thanks a lot! If an electronic shell can keep two electrons in one shell, then obviously the circles with more then two electrons in the scheme aren't representing shells. The second and third circle represent four shells. What is the reason for this monstrosity of a dilemma in my head? What does it mean "to solve the Schrödinger's equation"? By the way, wasn't he the nerd with an affection for undead cats? I never heard, that he succeeded in producing one. But I'm relatively uncertain about that ... 😮 ... 😊 ... 😂

    @tcf70tyrannosapiensbonsai@tcf70tyrannosapiensbonsai26 күн бұрын
KZhead