The Nazi super plane that nearly won the war

2024 ж. 22 Мам.
456 199 Рет қаралды

Be My WINGMAN In War Thunder for FREE on PC, PS®5 and Xbox Series X|S: playwt.link/foundandexplained
Follow the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now. See you in battle!
Scroll down for more information
forms.gle/y7aL6fs73gQRU4B3A
- First, get the game War Thunder with a bonus here: playwt.link/foundandexplained
- Do the tutorial so you know how to play.
- Add your username to this list: forms.gle/LVnSLqJWkReULLSWA
and during the live stream, I will pick some random names from the list.
- I will be playing every weekend at different times, so everyone will get a go.
NEW CHANNEL:
• Launched from the bigg...
Discord: / discord
My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
Patreon:
/ foundandexplained

Пікірлер
  • Interesting Fact: The British assumed that the Germans stole their idea of the turbojet engine. After the war, the designer of the Me 262 and his British counterpart met each other to compare notes and concluded that the designs of the jet engines were very different from each other.

    @BHuang92@BHuang92 Жыл бұрын
    • Similar to how Northrop and Horten worked simultaneously on flying wing concepts. War really creates genius ideas.

      @DefinitelyNotEmma@DefinitelyNotEmma Жыл бұрын
    • The German engines suffered from poor quality metallurgy. Whittle realised early on that for the jet to be reliable this was crucial. Me 262s etc needed complete engine changes after a few sorties.

      @uingaeoc3905@uingaeoc3905 Жыл бұрын
    • IIRC, the British developed the first Centrifugal Jet engine, while the Germans developed Axial-Flow, inline style Jet engines too.

      @SomeOrdinaryJanitor@SomeOrdinaryJanitor Жыл бұрын
    • @@SomeOrdinaryJanitor Yet were hopelessly unreliable. Your point is? FUN FACT - the Soviets realised the German jet engines they captured were useless. They tried espionage to discover UK metallurgical technology hoping to use the material with copying the German engine designs, that didn't work. They therefore bought Rolls Royce engines and a licence and copied them. The MiG 15 was powered by these. The US engines were the same.

      @uingaeoc3905@uingaeoc3905 Жыл бұрын
    • wow

      @tywilliams4332@tywilliams4332 Жыл бұрын
  • Too little and too late , can you imagine if Me-262 is operational by 1941

    @stevenharsono9911@stevenharsono9911 Жыл бұрын
    • while interesting concept i think allies would have been superior since the german luftwaffe didnt really have experience with the importance of energy and altitute since remember, they skipped the most important part the late pistons where altitute is needed

      @stefix5554@stefix5554 Жыл бұрын
    • We also have to take into account of doctrine for this aircraft had it been operational in that year, which would be so complicated I don’t think most people can guess it, me included.

      @dannyzero692@dannyzero692 Жыл бұрын
    • War pushes development. If the Me262 appeared earlier then the British Jet would have rapidly been brought into service.

      @DaiElsan@DaiElsan Жыл бұрын
    • They'd still be facing lack of materials to build them and the lack of production capacity.

      @Slay1337pl@Slay1337pl Жыл бұрын
    • @@dannyzero692 I think it would've been similar to the MiG-21s in Vietnam. Ambush and run if I remember it correctly.

      @notaulgoodman9732@notaulgoodman9732 Жыл бұрын
  • Nearly won the war? There was no way in hell the M.E 262 could have won the war in the small numbers it was produced. No chance in hell.

    @SuaveSpyMojo@SuaveSpyMojo11 ай бұрын
    • Me 262 lowkey trash

      @barefootbreezy6983@barefootbreezy6983Ай бұрын
    • @@barefootbreezy6983it’s not that it was trash it’s just that it worked a lot more differently to a traditional fighter

      @Explosionsarecooler69@Explosionsarecooler6911 күн бұрын
  • Imagine being one of the first ppl to pilot those jet fighters, honestly it mustve felt incredibly badass 😂

    @sabrinaleedance@sabrinaleedance Жыл бұрын
    • They were prone to fires, so I think anxiety would have been high. New aircraft are usually treated with more distrust than joy.

      @uberbeeg@uberbeeg Жыл бұрын
    • @@uberbeeg must have been an intense mixture of excitement and fear. you have to believe they mustve been thrilled with how much faster it was when they opened the throttle

      @jacoblunn29@jacoblunn29 Жыл бұрын
    • Badass? 🤦‍♂️

      @dingse3_@dingse3_ Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@dingse3_ what about it?

      @BGI_guy@BGI_guy Жыл бұрын
    • I’m about to unlock it in war thunder today and I’m gonna be going 3x faster than my friends 😆

      @patrickmiddleton1750@patrickmiddleton1750 Жыл бұрын
  • Seeing one in the Smithsonian in 1992 was awesome. However, IMHO, “ Hitler ruined in” is a fable. This jet required tons of maintenance and rare materials, and premium fuel, which means it was unlikely to ever reach greater numbers than it did. But having said that, well done video.

    @woltzwurld6760@woltzwurld6760 Жыл бұрын
    • It didn't require premium fuel, it did however have a lot of problems with rushed development, rushed engine design, and poor craftsmanship.

      @brettknoss486@brettknoss4862 ай бұрын
  • The fate of German airspace was not up to the ME 262 just as the fate of the defense of Germany was not up to the Panzer VIII Maus.

    @Edax_Royeaux@Edax_Royeaux Жыл бұрын
    • Not in 1944, but imagine if HC listened to galland in 1942 and produced nothing but 190s and 262s for their fighter roles. Lots needed to go right for the overall war effort for Germany but if the 262 was produced earlier in the war when Germany had access to the men and materials needed to field them in high number, the 262 would have dominated the skys east and west.

      @nathanlapointe1665@nathanlapointe16655 ай бұрын
    • @@nathanlapointe1665 A reaction prompts a counter reaction. The Gloster Meteor was introduced 2 months after the 262 (and the Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star a little after the Meteor). If the 262 appears earlier then the Gloster Meteor becomes a higher priority for the RAF and they would be perhaps less worried about Meteors being shot down over Germany and reverse engineered, thus being more aggressive with them. The 262 is also fuel and resource hungry and would bleed the Luftwaffe to death sooner, thus perhaps ending the war quicker.

      @Edax_Royeaux@Edax_Royeaux5 ай бұрын
  • I was lucky to shake hands with a man named Huey lamp who shot down a ME 262 in P-47. He said he saw the me 262 below him and used his superior energy of high altitude and the sheer weight of his p-47 to catch up and shoot it down. Crazy what people went through.

    @generalsirc2615@generalsirc2615 Жыл бұрын
    • Ok

      @neoaxis3749@neoaxis3749 Жыл бұрын
    • I had the honor of shaking hands with many dead pilots who were victims of ME-262. BTW, I am writing this comment from hell where those pilots are stacked for killing thousands of innocent Germans.

      @UndoEverything@UndoEverything Жыл бұрын
    • @@UndoEverything Ok

      @neoaxis3749@neoaxis3749 Жыл бұрын
    • US pilots shot down migs with prop planes in vietnam

      @KrGsMrNKusinagi0@KrGsMrNKusinagi011 ай бұрын
    • K

      @jaykay7932@jaykay793211 ай бұрын
  • The first 1st Gen fighter jet. To this day I just love how it looks like a flying shark. I imagine that later proposals like that Hohegeschwindigkeit models would have been able to compete with Korean War era MiG-15s and F-86s. The most important aspect however is that we should return to tradition and put 4 30mm gun in our fighter jets. FCAS with quad 30mm sounds like a very versatile platform xD

    @DefinitelyNotEmma@DefinitelyNotEmma Жыл бұрын
    • I think you forgot about British jets made during the Cold War that have 4 30mm ADEN cannons. There is a good reason why they didn't return to this idea ever again. As for the German MK108, sure, it is good if you can hit your enemy. You'd have a much higher change of hitting em with a Soviet 37mm cannon than what you can with these slow AF cannons. As for the Me-262 upgrade that can take out Sabres and MiGs, I don't know. If you are talking about the rocket engined 262, you'll still have more issues. The biggest problem is endurance. Till when can you keep firing your rockets ? By the time you ran out of rocket fuel, your enemy will have a massive advantage over you, making its endurance low. You also have to consider the Schwalbe's less than stellar maneuverability due to its heavier weight (2 engines underneath the wings won't help either). The only way to make the 262 capable of handling the MiGs or the Sabres in the Korean War is by finding a much better engine. You don't need any rocket engines or an extra engine, you just need to find a way to get an engine that produces at least 15000kN each and you're good to go. This means that your new 262 has the same endurance as the Korean War stuff, but also competing in terms of performance. At the end of the day, you want more engine power from the engine itself rather than from extra additions such as rockets to give it the much coveted continuous endurance (which is still in the minds of aircraft manufacturers till this day). Apart from that, the Me-262 looks absolutely good and solid. It's flight performance is still questionable compared to a Meteor. Remember that speed and speed alone isn't everything; you also need acceleration and maneuverability to be considered to be a good plane, which, I believe, the Meteor simply wins over the Schwalbe.

      @thenathan4490@thenathan4490 Жыл бұрын
    • It had swept wings in one design, a well as a radar and night fighting rescources. This means that the Germans had the designs to make a 3rd gen jet in the 40's

      @peppapig9987@peppapig9987 Жыл бұрын
    • @@thenathan4490 he was talking about the high speed version of the 262, HG2 and HG3 and according to wind tunnel tests, their performance would be close to the Korean war jets

      @foxhound5985@foxhound5985 Жыл бұрын
    • @@thenathan4490 262 acceleration was marginally higher than the meteor

      @foxhound5985@foxhound5985 Жыл бұрын
    • @@peppapig9987 that is literally the dumbest thing i have ever read, thankyou for the giggle good sir!

      @theidioticgentleman4646@theidioticgentleman4646 Жыл бұрын
  • Those engines had a 20 hour life before replacement lol. Still beautiful and innovative

    @vitsirosh3722@vitsirosh3722 Жыл бұрын
    • Lack of chrome and cobalt

      @charlesburgoyne-probyn6044@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 Жыл бұрын
    • Lubrication was also a factor as normal oil could not survive the engine temps. The Germans invented synthetic oil to resolve this problem. Today's jet engines use a synthetic oil.

      @user-wz9wj8eo8f@user-wz9wj8eo8f4 ай бұрын
  • Great vid. The animations are great, noticed this time you even had some Red Tails footage. Me163 and He162 next? Perhaps the Ar234 jet bomber which had radar equipped night fighter version can be featured too at some point?

    @pilotpug@pilotpug Жыл бұрын
  • I hate when things say Germany almost could have won the war. The german oil production was absolutely dismal by 1944. Pilots from British and American training were coming in at 400 hours+. New German pilots were coming with 1/4 of that because of fuel saving. They could have produced 9000 of these planes and it would have made zero difference because of fuel and training limitations. Its not a fun side to study but starting looking at the production numbers in ww2 and unless Germany got a nuke, it would never have ever been in their favor. When reading a higher call I think in 1943 the Luftwaffe was defending Sicily with 17 fighters vs the American and British combined 1000.

    @gregHePilots@gregHePilots11 ай бұрын
    • Yep and the usual suspects knew this,before they declared war on Germany,they knew that they could never get their hands on enough oil,regardless on what wounderwaffe they came up with.

      @paullooney2522@paullooney252211 ай бұрын
  • Great video! If you are doing videos in more well-known aircraft, I recommend the Yakovlev Yak-28.

    @richardgaunt9417@richardgaunt9417 Жыл бұрын
  • Just amazing work, keep improving your content Mr. Found and Explained! ⚜️⚡️

    @shawnesquilona3066@shawnesquilona3066 Жыл бұрын
  • Always great to see a new video 🙂

    @EmihleSibiya_144@EmihleSibiya_144 Жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for adding footage from Red Tails. Some people liked it, some people didn't but you can't deny the CGI used in the aerial combat scenes especially against the Me-262.

    @DarthBaras13@DarthBaras13 Жыл бұрын
    • True, besides the physics breaking and the fact that even a sprinkle of 30mm would have dismantled those P-51s like a dropped lego set. Too bas they didn't model their HE shells

      @natedturtle@natedturtle9 ай бұрын
  • Great video! The Me262 is one of my favorite WWII designs. It's so beautiful. You might find an essay in the book "If the Allies Had Fallen: Sixty Alternate Scenarios of World War II" interesting. In Chapter 13, "Hitler's Role", historian Gerhard L. Weinberg argues that the fighter wasn't too late; instead, it was too early. Given Germany's wartime situation, it didn't have the money or resources for working on experimental "wonder weapons" that might or might not work. In contrast, the Allies could put huge amounts money and resources into such projects; the atomic bomb being the prime example. Germany didn't have that luxury.

    @TheKulu42@TheKulu42 Жыл бұрын
    • the germans were screwed. they had to fight the two largest super powers. The amount of stuff the us could make was about as much as the entire rest of the world combined. also there was no way to hurt americas production. USSR, UK, Japanese, and german industry could be bombed. GL hitting america

      @Theaverageazn247@Theaverageazn247 Жыл бұрын
    • Wait, how too early, again, other than just shouldn’t have happened for her? (Which I agree with).

      @StalinLovsMsmZioglowfagz@StalinLovsMsmZioglowfagz Жыл бұрын
    • War back then was about innovation. Whoever had the best ideas would win. It wasn’t too early, it was just when it needed to be

      @buhkaw@buhkaw Жыл бұрын
    • @@buhkaw Yes, there was quite a lot of innovation. One of the Germany's main problems, I believe, was thinking the war would be short.

      @TheKulu42@TheKulu42 Жыл бұрын
    • @@TheKulu42 one of germanys main problems was that they didnt have enough fuel. all the innovation and wonder weapons in the world arent going to help. maybe they should have developed a 'wonder horse' to pull their 'mechanized' divisions....

      @xisotopex@xisotopex Жыл бұрын
  • Great videos. I love all your vids and especially the ones on current and non prototype aircrafts. Also amazing models. Everything is great about your channel. Btw, a quick question about the War thunder sponsor, how long does it last and does it activate right after you download the game?

    @legendary_a4@legendary_a4 Жыл бұрын
    • Thank you for being a viewer. For Wathunder the deal is always ongoing for new players.

      @FoundAndExplained@FoundAndExplained Жыл бұрын
  • There were other developments of the ME-262 during the second world war, variants that would make the aircraft look incredibly modern and these variants being the HG series. Perhaps you can make a video of this? No rush.

    @ethannguyen498@ethannguyen498 Жыл бұрын
  • AMAZING WORK, BROMAN. GOOD DAMN WORK.

    @HellenicWolf@HellenicWolf Жыл бұрын
  • At no point did this plane "nearly" win the war. It didn't even prolong it a day.

    @denroy3@denroy38 ай бұрын
  • Chuck Yeager when asked about the ME262, he relied: “First time I saw a jet, I shot it down.”

    @stevejones8660@stevejones86609 ай бұрын
  • The real reason that the Me262 arrived “too little too late“ was the chronic delays in perfecting production of the Jumo jet engines. Hitler’s stupid and contradictory orders were very unhelpful, but even if he had Supported the fighter version from the very beginning, the plane would still have evolved as it did simply because there were not enough reliable jet engines to equip more than the handful of planes that actually flew.

    @Senor0Droolcup@Senor0Droolcup Жыл бұрын
    • Germans would have needed to develop and mass produce their jet engines and places in peace time because of the huge need for heat resistant allows... Ni, Cr, W, alloyed steel. Plus the precession machine tools need to manufacture turbine and compressor component to tight tolerances, etc. Plus the number required of long range fighters and bombers, fuel requirements.

      @AjitMD@AjitMD Жыл бұрын
    • Lack of chrome and cobalt

      @charlesburgoyne-probyn6044@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 Жыл бұрын
  • I love these analyses and history of a vehicle keep it up. P.S can ya do one on the JF-17?

    @mab2187@mab2187 Жыл бұрын
  • Could you make videos on the german TA183 and the P1101 as well?They're pretty interesting aircraft.

    @hauntified9060@hauntified9060 Жыл бұрын
  • Top Tier video, great research and nice presentation

    @spaceandcars6933@spaceandcars693311 ай бұрын
  • Great production! In Messerschmitt the double-s in Messer is pronounced exactly like in the word mess. The sch in schmitt is pronounced like the sh in short or ship. You did it right a couple of times and wrong a couple of others. Cheers, Johannes

    @GreasyFingers@GreasyFingers Жыл бұрын
  • Did you recently update your graphics? They look great!

    @TSlambrose@TSlambrose Жыл бұрын
  • A great leap forward, but they drank a lot of fuel and had a limited range of flight. Also needed to take off from a cement runway so they used the Autobahn. Armed with rockets and piloted with experienced pilots they had a seven to one kill ratio!

    @danielafreedman@danielafreedman Жыл бұрын
  • That aside, will there be a video on the Yak-41 in the future? It was a soviet VTOL project and even flew. Lockheed later purchased some of the technology used and utilized an improved version of the system in the F-35B.

    @DefinitelyNotEmma@DefinitelyNotEmma Жыл бұрын
    • Yes please, I love this plane. I want him to also clear up the ideas around people stealing the idea of a engine that turned down.

      @jarebare510@jarebare510 Жыл бұрын
  • That clip from Inglorious Basterds really made me laugh

    @blitzzkrieg1400@blitzzkrieg1400 Жыл бұрын
  • One big issue for the ME 262 you failed to talk about was the fact Germany didn't have the Fuel to actually have a large scale fleet of ME 262s Cool design but it was way too little way too late and just therr weren't the resources for it

    @Turkolini@Turkolini Жыл бұрын
    • By the way, the Me-262 ran on diesel. And by the design of Turbojets, it was essentially a TDI.

      @barnykirashi@barnykirashi Жыл бұрын
    • Jet fuel was at least easier to make than high octane piston engine fuel. But certainly, by the time Germany introduced its jets, the ship had long sailed, the war situation was absolutely hopeless for Germany from 1943/44 onwards.

      @wanderschlosser1857@wanderschlosser1857 Жыл бұрын
    • If introduced earlier, they would. Also, jet fuel is theoretically easier to produce.

      @theslavicsailor6654@theslavicsailor6654 Жыл бұрын
    • It's generally an asterisk, it did little to alter the war, except by Germany spending time, money and resources that should of went elsewhere

      @denroy3@denroy38 ай бұрын
    • @@theslavicsailor6654 if? If? Then the US maybe nukes Berlin. It wasn't operational because it was in development.

      @denroy3@denroy38 ай бұрын
  • Hitler demanding a jabo version didn't delay the deployment of the 262 by much, contrary to popular beliefs. The demand for jabo capability is also somewhat understandable given that every luftwaffe fighters at the time also had jabo capability, in a way most ww2 fighters ended up having fighter bomber capability in one form or another, especially American ones.

    @mark009vn@mark009vn10 ай бұрын
    • Additionally, it was mandatory for all new fighter aircraft to be able to carry bombs.

      @solid244@solid24410 ай бұрын
  • Props for showing footage from the “Red tails” movie

    @jumaclo@jumaclo Жыл бұрын
  • The title is a sensationalist misnomer. With approximately only 500 unverifiable kills to its name (German pilots just claimed what they liked), versus the enormous cost of the design and development, and constant replacement of those engines, added to an unknown number of losses to its own pilots, due to engine malfunction, lack of pilot training, and kills by the allies, the title is only a fantasy, probably based on lots of ifs and buts, that had circumstances been different, It would all have been much more fantastic than it was, and we can all have those moments. However, its best to live in reality, than through garish comics........

    @artrandy@artrandy Жыл бұрын
    • Couldn't said it better. Nearly won the war😂

      @Joop.23-2-63@Joop.23-2-63 Жыл бұрын
  • I have the squadron version in war thunder and it’s quite good against propeller aircraft pilots but you mostly fight Cold War jets and even stuff like mig 15s and F-86 Sabres that’s are better than the 262 in most ways

    @hudsongray5091@hudsongray5091 Жыл бұрын
  • 7:30 The Sturmvogel could be roughly translated as thunderbird, sturm meaning storm and vogel meaning bird.

    @SuperCrabCraft@SuperCrabCraft11 ай бұрын
  • Please consider doing a P51 video! Such legend needs recognition haha

    @maxshelby8245@maxshelby8245 Жыл бұрын
  • I've been waiting fir this vid

    @Ivan-tv6pi@Ivan-tv6pi Жыл бұрын
  • Zeigt keine Gnade!

    @randomdeadpool@randomdeadpool Жыл бұрын
  • This is great new video thanks

    @ajj9981@ajj9981 Жыл бұрын
  • Fun fact: the me 262 has a bad performance engine rather than a fast jet they got a not fast jet most of them getting shot down by a p51s.

    @vergilmemes455@vergilmemes455 Жыл бұрын
    • 262 was faster but most were shot during takeoff or landing because of its atrocious takeoff time.

      @barefootbreezy6983@barefootbreezy6983Ай бұрын
  • Another interesting video ty

    @rose415@rose415 Жыл бұрын
  • The Meteor was developed in a similar time frame and introduced in 1944, but focus was on piston aircraft as they were so well developed and not really any 'worse' on the whole than early jets. You can't help that think that a shed load of FW190 would have been more of a problem than the 262

    @TimInertiatic@TimInertiatic Жыл бұрын
    • Agreed. The 262's kill: losses ratio was 1 : 1.5, not very good. By comparison, the Tempest's kill : losses ratio was 7 : 1 on all types and 6 : 1 against single seaters.

      @raypurchase801@raypurchase801 Жыл бұрын
    • the thing with the overrated Tempest was, it was only at the right place at the right time, but it wasn't a really modern fighter plane during that time, nor was it a perfect one as others too.

      @Gute_Laune_Goy@Gute_Laune_Goy Жыл бұрын
    • @@Gute_Laune_Goy it was pretty good! The Sea Fury was developed from it and that's pretty much the definitive piston engined fighter. But right place, right time is what you want. Jets weren't really competitive for another decade at least. Yes, on its day, a 262 could out perform anything. However, it sucked up resource and was only really useful in certain circumstances. A squadron of Tempests however could cause havoc reliably.

      @TimInertiatic@TimInertiatic Жыл бұрын
    • The first Meteor I with Welland engines had a speed of only 444mph when Derwent I were introduced the speed may have gotten to 460mph. It wasn't any faster than a Ta 152 or Spitfire XVIII or F.24. The Meteor III wasn't much faster because the Derwents were restricted as well. On top of that the navels produced shock drag and had to be enlarged and modified several times on both Meteor I and III. The result was that the Meteor wasn't a fast jet until after the war due to the engines and nacelle.

      @williamzk9083@williamzk9083 Жыл бұрын
    • A FW190 wasn't really cheaper to make than a 262. Especially the jet engines were cheaper than the latest piston engines. Plus the fuel required for jets was much cheaper and easier to make as well. It made absolutely sense to build jet aircraft. But in reality the war situation made anything Germany did by then (1944) absolutely pointless. Even if focused on less complex but more numerous designs for aircraft, tanks or other equipment the war in Europe very likely would have ended in 1945 plus/minus 3-4 months. An extended war in Europe might also have concluded with a nuke like in Asia.

      @wanderschlosser1857@wanderschlosser1857 Жыл бұрын
  • hahah loved the try in german pronauntioation its tuff Schwalbe and Sturmvogel are my favorite :D

    @pierrengan7331@pierrengan7331 Жыл бұрын
  • Imagine if this replaced the 109 around the time of Operation Barbarossa. Btw love how you graphic have improved.

    @yaboyed5779@yaboyed5779 Жыл бұрын
    • Nope. The Me109 was a great plane for its time, but you need to replace it in 1938 with something better and eaier to fly plane. The german airforce struggled with so many things, a jet as thirsty as the Me262 is NOT the solution.

      @steffenjonda8283@steffenjonda8283 Жыл бұрын
  • ah yes, the first jet fighter that shook the daydreams outta the allies

    @canadianrobloxian74@canadianrobloxian748 ай бұрын
  • Bugatti 100P. An incredible design that deserves some love.

    @newenglandexpansionistsoci2613@newenglandexpansionistsoci2613 Жыл бұрын
  • Good morning hope everyone’s having a good day so far

    @krisskross9994@krisskross9994 Жыл бұрын
    • how did you comment 58 minutes ago if the video was sent 21 minutes ago?

      @mrhappy3814@mrhappy3814 Жыл бұрын
    • I commented whilst it was waiting to premiere

      @krisskross9994@krisskross9994 Жыл бұрын
  • Great to see this channel blow up, just two things in this particular vid got me. As far as I know you don't pronounce aircraft names as one word, you pronounce each letter. For example you wouldn't call an FA-18 a 'fah eighteen' same for Me or He. secondly, 6:51 Imminent, not intimate lol

    @smeghead666@smeghead666 Жыл бұрын
    • I think he does that because it’s part of the name, kind of like Su-37 or Mi-8. F/A is pronounced “eff a”because it’s a designation for Fighter/Attack.

      @Aiophgy@Aiophgy Жыл бұрын
    • Also like maybe it’s something with German and Russian where the first letters of the company get thrown in the name

      @Aiophgy@Aiophgy Жыл бұрын
    • @@Aiophgy as far as i know, the only reason Russian planes names are pronounced whole, has to do with the Cyrillic language, where they pronounce Acronyms as words. like the PPSh, the russians would call it something closer to "Papesho" or "PaPashaw". the actual russian spelling is ППШ (Still PPSh) but the Ш is an english Sh.

      @SomeOrdinaryJanitor@SomeOrdinaryJanitor Жыл бұрын
    • Yeah this guy rarely pronounces things correctly lol. Love his channel, but he definitely doesn't listen to his own videos and check for mistakes before posting.

      @mitchelljakubka@mitchelljakubka Жыл бұрын
    • @@mitchelljakubka Agree - for example, I've never heard anybody pronounce the FW-190 as the "fuhwuh-190". Also, please, please, please, people who make videos about WW2 and Germany, for the love of god, learn some basic German pronunciation!! For example, "Luftwaffe" is pronounced "looft-vahfeh". The issue is, when you mispronounce these things, your credibility plummets. As soon as I hear things pronounced incorrectly, I switch off. It's the same in audio books. I'm amazed at how these authors/narrators don't make the effort to learn the correct pronunciations.

      @STEMCreativity@STEMCreativity Жыл бұрын
  • Keep up the good work

    @mikagriffith@mikagriffith Жыл бұрын
  • IMO the first fighter jet ever was the coolest fighter jet ever.

    @tomschmeichel1890@tomschmeichel1890 Жыл бұрын
    • Cough cough f22 raptor.

      @barefootbreezy6983@barefootbreezy6983Ай бұрын
  • I've stood next to one in South Africa at the National Museum of Military History. Was kind of surprised by how big it is in person. Makes something like a 182 look like a toy.

    @tjaartjacobs5546@tjaartjacobs554611 ай бұрын
  • 2:35 you forgot to say that with every update comes new portion of leaked classivied miliatry files

    @netquit6880@netquit6880 Жыл бұрын
  • The Me262 not only didn't was even nearly to won the war, it failed to make any significative difference.

    @cesaravegah3787@cesaravegah3787 Жыл бұрын
  • Hitler was always shooting himself in the foot.... truly many times MANY ways... THIS WAS NO COINCIDENCE.....

    @bobbybrooks4826@bobbybrooks4826 Жыл бұрын
  • By the time the Me 262 came into production, the German manufacturing capabilities were in shambles. And these early generation jet engines needed to be completely rebuilt practically every other time they were flown. Lack of Jet fuel and experienced pilots were an issue by that time as well.

    @stevefox7566@stevefox7566Ай бұрын
  • Seeing one at RIAT flying this year :)

    @OSFGR4@OSFGR4 Жыл бұрын
  • Please add a link to the interview of Hanna Reitsch; she was a Me 262 test pilot, and the first woman to fly a jet aircraft. Her first hand description of her first test flight, "The speed was absolutely intoxicating!"

    @josephsheranda@josephsheranda Жыл бұрын
    • remarkable woman, demonized because you know why

      @jgunther3398@jgunther339811 ай бұрын
    • @@jgunther3398 It's possible to acknowledge accomplishments without endorsing the agenda. Some people can't separate the two.

      @josephsheranda@josephsheranda11 ай бұрын
  • Titel: "nearly won the war" Video: "not nearly enough to change anything" XD ,nice video tho

    @koira6262@koira62624 ай бұрын
  • One correction, which many probably already said: The Me-262 was never in a position to win the war for Germany. - Germany was already losing on all fronts when they were deployed. - They were never deployed in large enough numbers to make a noticeable impact, much less a decisive one. - Even if Germany managed to produce enough of them, they lacked the resources to deploy them in large numbers for a sustained period of time, since by then they were experiencing fuel shortages. - And even if they had the numbers and resources, it wasn't so advanced as to decisively outclass all other allied planes. There are stories of Me-262's engaging piston-engine fighters and managing to come out on top due to its altitude advantage and several problems with the Me-262. - Finally, the Me-262 did not maintain its technological superiority for that long. By the end of the war the allies were starting to field their own jet fighters.

    @Diego-zz1df@Diego-zz1df8 ай бұрын
    • Yep, it may have shortened the war by taking away resources, manpower and development.

      @denroy3@denroy38 ай бұрын
    • @@denroy3 No, that's not what I'm saying.

      @Diego-zz1df@Diego-zz1df8 ай бұрын
    • ​@@Diego-zz1dfThere was nothing fielded after the war , many years of testing and upgrading . The F-80 in 1948 was the first jet fighter build in large numbers , the Gloster Meteor in I think 1947 . The first Meteor was ready in 1944 sure , but hardly faster than props . Meanwhile the Germans got the Me262 HG1 and HG2 ready , the war was lost in 1942 no question . But the jet fighter race the Germans won and we don't talk about their other projects . Horten 229 , He 162 and the Me163 .

      @5co756@5co7568 ай бұрын
    • ​@@5co756 wow ok there is so much to unpack here, the first gloster meteor was ready in 1943, and it entered service in 1944, it was much faster then props, and it quickly became faster then the Me-262, the meteors broke 962 km/h by 1945 and the me-262 still went around 890-900, apart from that the F-80 was ready in 1944, and entered service in 1945 where it was also faster then the Me-262, at 955 km/h, the only allied nation of the big 3 that didnt have a jet ready and in service by the end of the war was the soviets with the MiG-9 which first took to the air in 1946, so...yeah..while it was the first jet, and rather innovative, it fell off real quick by stuff fielded and upgrade (in the case of the meteor) after the war, so yeah, there was stuff fielded after the war, not sure where you got the idea that there was nothing.

      @Klimotine@Klimotine3 ай бұрын
    • @@Klimotine It was July 1944 and the F.1 was hardly any faster than late props , 460mph (740kph)top speed . The F.3 in November 1945 broke the speed record of 970kph , the war was already over . The Germans were out of game long time ago , the Me262 got no major upgrades wich were also planned . And the US got the P-80 wich also saw no combat in WW2 , only four were send to Europe wich two of them crashed and killed the pilots. Two were send back and one of them also crashed in the US , the F-80C went into service in 1948 . You don't even know the correct names and you wanna tell me something ? 😅 Both the Gloster Meteor and the F-80 were outdated as they went into service , no swept wings wich are essential for high speeds as the Germans discovered . Both got smoked in the Korean War by Mig15's , the F-86 Sabre was the real deal . The Meteor broke some speed records, but that's it . The F1 and even the F3 wouldn't had any chance against the Me262 in flight performance, wich is a reason why it saw no combat over Germany .

      @5co756@5co7563 ай бұрын
  • In 1944 Germany produced 7 million tons of fuel, the United States produced 250,000,000 tons of fuel. Me 262's were extremely complex, labor intensive and used materials that the Germans didn't have. They were not produced in large enough quantities to alter the outcome of the war.

    @jeffreywick4057@jeffreywick40578 ай бұрын
  • Everytime he claims "X plane/project could've turned the tides for the Germans" it feels like a Werhaboo with no understanding of the immense manpower and material difference between the Axis and Allies. "Amateurs talk strategy, professionals talk logistics" Gen. Bradley

    @natev7870@natev7870 Жыл бұрын
    • And smart people understand that the idea of air war change fundamentally if the R4M, a cheap easy rocket is developed in 1940. Then the yankeeaboos explain to me how the allies bomb the german production and transport system, the german cities... :D THAT is the wonderweapon you need to change ww2. With it every german plane can kill easily the allied bombers... think about this: say in 1942 you want to bomb a german areal but know, if you try to do so you loose 90% of your bombers in any mission you fly and your enemy loose 1/3 of their planes to OTL. Why? because the germans no longer need to put tons of HEAVY 30mm-guns on their planes... even the Me109F can now easily kill heavy bombers without getting into the allied defence fire :D

      @steffenjonda8283@steffenjonda8283 Жыл бұрын
  • 1:10 can you cite your sources on this? I couldn’t find anything about them being banned from the development of piston engines. Just that their Air Force had to be limited

    @kaidentjosaas7731@kaidentjosaas77319 ай бұрын
  • 0:42 No, it wasn't the first jet fighter. The Gloster Meteor had it's maiden flight in 1941, when the Me-262 was still a propeller driven proof of concept. It wouldn't be jet powered until 1942. You could perhaps argue it was the first *operational* jet fighter.

    @MeeesterBond17@MeeesterBond17Ай бұрын
  • thank you for the amazing videos

    @MyHhobbies@MyHhobbies Жыл бұрын
  • The treaty of Versailles was completely unfair, no need to “quote on quote” that

    @musicloverfallout@musicloverfallout Жыл бұрын
  • I like the use of red tails movie footage!

    @masonclark2310@masonclark2310 Жыл бұрын
  • Can you make video on A-4e skyhawk or su11 from 1947? i think that they are really cool aircraft that you can make some videos about

    @Pawe11o@Pawe11o Жыл бұрын
  • Nice work with the Pretty Boy from Red Tails paintjob.

    @andrewmontgomery5621@andrewmontgomery5621 Жыл бұрын
  • Adolf Galland described flying the Me 262 as "though an angel were pushing."

    @lavrentizapadni747@lavrentizapadni747 Жыл бұрын
    • Not flying, but instead described the engines with this sentence, because he saw no prop and only a high pitched sound was all the noise unlike pistons which vibrated and sounded loud throughout the flight.

      @igameidoresearchtoo6511@igameidoresearchtoo6511 Жыл бұрын
  • I wonder, or assume, the fighter bomber in development to supersede the me design had to be the flying wing. That could ostensibly make the trip to France considering what we know today about the B2 and it’s newer variants.

    @dang9668@dang966810 ай бұрын
  • The Messerschmitt Me 262 jet fighter is a world's first, It's second place is the Gloster Meteor British fighter plane.

    @angelomendoza1174@angelomendoza1174 Жыл бұрын
  • Another fantastic video, have you ever heard of the Coandă-1910, A Romanian/French plane built in 1910 and believed to be the first Turbo-Jet aircraft, predating the first jet plane by almost 30 years and only 7 years after the first wright brothers flight.

    @jamesbelcher9374@jamesbelcher9374 Жыл бұрын
  • This plane basically is the real life MS-14 Gelgoog from Gundam

    @ZETAPLUSA70@ZETAPLUSA70 Жыл бұрын
  • Hey the found and explained, have you heard that weserflug p.1003? Please make the video about p.1003 you've never heard before it going to be interesting.

    @THFC7477@THFC7477 Жыл бұрын
  • Military Aviation History did a video some time ago about that "it must be a bomber" and its not as clear cut as often portrayed. Germany was so short on airframes that all newly built fighters had to have fighter-bomber capability. Jets and props alike.

    @grdja83@grdja837 ай бұрын
  • 00:45 - it has finally happened!!!!! An English history documentary that correctly pronounces "Messerschmitt!! THANK YOU!!!!!! You have given me back hope in humanity 🥰😍😍😍🤩🤩🤩

    @wobc1872@wobc18723 ай бұрын
  • 262 was a great aircraft but after a couple of flights the engine was worn out and needed striping down and new parts adding regular.

    @michaelgardner2581@michaelgardner258110 ай бұрын
  • One of the things that wasn't worked out with the Me-262 was how to bail out. There were Nazi aircraft with ejection seats, but I don't think they were used in the -262. Still, a beautiful airplane with its graceful wings and shark-like fuselage.

    @WTDoorley@WTDoorley Жыл бұрын
  • Am I the only one who doesn't get notifications when he uploads even though I have nots turned on?

    @wogelson@wogelson Жыл бұрын
  • You gotta make a vid on the British skylon space craft.

    @heroinjuicebox3789@heroinjuicebox3789 Жыл бұрын
  • This is first jet fighter plane.This is one of a great technology at that time

    @ugamer6581@ugamer6581 Жыл бұрын
  • 1:00 no need for airquotes there, the treaty was bs all the way trough

    @MaticTheProto@MaticTheProto Жыл бұрын
  • @Found And Explained i been looking for people to play with did you ever wanna play sometime?

    @sharkgaming518@sharkgaming518 Жыл бұрын
  • Hearing this master piece of engineering called the "me" 262 rather than "m e" 262 was shameful

    @vinrico6704@vinrico6704 Жыл бұрын
    • Exactly what I was thinking! I've noticed similar mistakes in other videos too! and it's a shame as it spoils an otherwise good video.

      @Fluffytoebeans@Fluffytoebeans Жыл бұрын
  • Pilot in Me-262: Ah these lovely fighters are going to win the war! Hitler: I WANT BOMBERS! NAI NAI NAI (7:53)

    @hamzasherasmat6593@hamzasherasmat65939 ай бұрын
  • i recognice WT german chat when i hear it xD

    @crixt4016@crixt4016 Жыл бұрын
  • The first Jet engines were horrible. They were not yet reliable. The 262 couldn't go with out major failures every 25 hours. The meterials science and manufacturing techniques had yet to be perfected to be able to make this jet utilized in a war.

    @Doofwarrior88@Doofwarrior88 Жыл бұрын
  • please do he162 video about the ejection seat it had

    @Crispy_Crisp@Crispy_Crisp Жыл бұрын
  • The "Sturmvogel" pronunciation got me! Im not german and Im sure I dont pronounce it right, but you said STRUmvogel instead of STURmvogel

    @NOGRIZZGUY@NOGRIZZGUY Жыл бұрын
  • The Boeing Super Phantom would be interesting to see

    @donovannotmyname7306@donovannotmyname7306 Жыл бұрын
  • The totenkopf on the me 262 looks kinda wack😎

    @markussnyman8695@markussnyman8695 Жыл бұрын
  • Am I the only person who noticed that the tracers for the outer 30mm autocannons on the 262 at the videos start were coming from the wings?

    @donnym3415@donnym3415 Жыл бұрын
    • You're not the only one

      @mohamadzaroura1035@mohamadzaroura1035 Жыл бұрын
  • "There is simply nothing comparable?" - I don't know, the British had jet fighters at a relatively comparable state of development, they were just not desperate enough to put them into frontline action, and wanted to avoid any crashing over enemy territory to be taken apart by the enemy, so mostly used them over British territory defensively, particularly agains V1s, while gaining experience with jet plane handling characteristics without risking their best aces and building up their numbers to a point, where if necessary they would actually matter. That's the problem with all these Wunderwaffen non-sense. It isn't that the allies didn't have amazing new inventions of their own, sometimes even in the same area, they just didn't have to use prototypes on the frontline, at least later in the war, and what they got from Germany after victory gave them complementary technology that together with their own created that seeming sudden burst in perceived technological capability.

    @autarchprinceps@autarchprinceps Жыл бұрын
    • That is true. This channel is mix both truth and bullshit.

      @Beorninki@Beorninki Жыл бұрын
    • Luckily the germans didn't have enough fuel to run these weapons.. and enough steel and metals to build them.....

      @khylebaguingan8211@khylebaguingan8211 Жыл бұрын
    • @@khylebaguingan8211 And enough factories, factory workers, pilots, ground crews, ...

      @autarchprinceps@autarchprinceps Жыл бұрын
    • @@autarchprinceps there being bomb everywhere

      @khylebaguingan8211@khylebaguingan8211 Жыл бұрын
  • "The first time I saw a jet, I shot it down." -Chuck Yeager

    @Iknowtoomuchable@Iknowtoomuchable Жыл бұрын
    • So what? This is the quote of a man who did what? The german jets were no ÜBER-weapons... but they mean you cannot defend your bombers, esp. if these jets come 2 years earlier and esp. if the R4M-rockets come in 4 years earlier... Just think about it.

      @steffenjonda8283@steffenjonda8283 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@steffenjonda8283Try saying all that garbage without crying, Steffi 😂

      @thekenneth8232@thekenneth823211 ай бұрын
  • Fun fact: This plane was the inspiration for the Gloster meteor jet(AKA the First ever Allied jet. made to Combat the V1)

    @jessicasamarita2181@jessicasamarita218118 күн бұрын
  • Fact is, the ME 262 was introduce too late in the war and was plagued with problems that made it not much of a threat. A couple of month later the UK introduced their jet fighter and a few weeks after that so did the US The 262 gets all the press solely because it was the first operational jet fighter

    @Barb5001@Barb5001 Жыл бұрын
    • It's not just the first operational jet fighter. It was the engine type they used. The Americans and Brits had the Centrifugal Jet engine. The Germans on the other hand had the Axial-Flow jet engine that we use today.

      @appliedengineering4001@appliedengineering4001 Жыл бұрын
    • It was at the end of the war. The Germans were low on resources and definitely did not have access to all the necessary metals to improve the jet engines. Despite the short comings it proved to be an amazing fighter plane with a kill ratio that was actually good. Hitlers insistence on using it as a bomber essentially handicapping the jet and lack of good pilots because of attrition sealed the fate. Also the German jet engine design is what we use in modern jets not the British design.

      @anirudhhhh@anirudhhhh10 ай бұрын
    • @@presidenteden6498 Adolf Galland was completely wrong then.

      @Vegito_Fanpage@Vegito_Fanpage8 ай бұрын
  • These planes were revolutionary but with serious drawbacks. They were slow to accelerate. They were not maneuverable. They extremely finicky on the throttle and required smooth inputs or a possible flameout or engine fire could happen. Because of this they required a long downwind leg on landing to get the plane to slow down that made them vulnerable. The fuel was vey volatile and the cannons had limited range and ammo capacity.

    @MackTheGovnah@MackTheGovnah Жыл бұрын
  • Can you make a video on the Ho 229?

    @MyLordZeus@MyLordZeus9 ай бұрын
  • Still a beaute of a plane, all these years later.

    @brll5733@brll5733 Жыл бұрын
KZhead