Erich Raeder - Grand Admiral of the Kriegsmarine Documentary

2023 ж. 11 Қаз.
177 636 Рет қаралды

For early access to our videos, discounted merch and many other exclusive perks please support us as a Patron or Member...
Patreon: / thepeopleprofiles
Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/peoplepr...
KZhead Membership: / @peopleprofiles
or follow us on Twitter! / tpprofiles
Hello guys! If you like our work please subscribe to our second channel The History Chronicles / thehistorychronicles
The script for this video has been checked with Plagiarism software and scored 1% on Grammarly. In academia, a score of below 15% is considered good or acceptable.
All footage, images and music used in People Profiles Documentaries are sourced from free media websites or are purchased with commercial rights from online media archives.
Bundesarchiv, Bild CC-BY-SA 3.0
US National Archives, CC BY 3.0
#Biography #History #Documentary

Пікірлер
  • For early access to our videos, discounted merch and many other exclusive perks please support us as a Patron or Member... Patreon: www.patreon.com/thepeopleprofiles Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/peopleprofiles KZhead Membership: kzhead.info/tools/D6TPU-PvTMvqgzC_AM7_uA.htmljoin or follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/tpprofiles

    @PeopleProfiles@PeopleProfiles7 ай бұрын
    • Huge fan of your work! Please don't forget Athelstan the Glorious🎉🎉🎉🎉

      @danielsantiagourtado3430@danielsantiagourtado34307 ай бұрын
    • @@danielsantiagourtado3430 He will be done next year.

      @PeopleProfiles@PeopleProfiles7 ай бұрын
    • @@PeopleProfiles Got it guys!

      @danielsantiagourtado3430@danielsantiagourtado34307 ай бұрын
    • že

      @miloslavdoubrava1396@miloslavdoubrava13967 ай бұрын
  • Wonderfully narrated, knew very little about his life and dedication to his career.

    @chemicalqueen5460@chemicalqueen54607 ай бұрын
    • It's one of history's biggest ironies that the US charged the Nazis with "crimes against the peace" There has never been a country as war-loving as the US. Napoleon was a pacifist in comparison. The US literally drops bombs on weddings, funerals and failed states like Somalia. The US was literally dropping bombs on Somalia the day the Russians crossed the border into Ukraine. Right at this moment, the us is breaking all international law bombing Gaza and now is using nerve agents against the civilians therein. Even the Nazis absolutely and steadfastly refused to bring back the scourge of the first world war and its widespread use of chemical weapons. NOT THE US. NOT IN 2023. The US is the only country to have ever dropped a nuclear weapon on civilians or anyone for that matter.

      @tarstarkusz@tarstarkusz6 ай бұрын
  • Best narrator yet.

    @cob0734@cob07347 ай бұрын
  • I love this series...very.. personal 💯

    @user-zr7rc8xg9k@user-zr7rc8xg9k7 ай бұрын
  • Very interesting and well presented...formidable characters....

    @edwardbertorelli7358@edwardbertorelli73587 ай бұрын
  • "Stern encouragement!" Only an Englishman can say that! LOL! As an American, I never heard that expression, but it makes absolute sense!

    @tibzig1@tibzig16 ай бұрын
  • Ooh I enjoyed this narration too. So many great voices and great information. Thanks again for the time and effort. Best to you all. ❤😊

    @skiker4560@skiker45607 ай бұрын
  • Raedar was a single issue voter and that single issue was “BOATS”

    @crumpetandtea@crumpetandtea7 ай бұрын
    • Nice analogy. You're so right 😆

      @aymonfoxc1442@aymonfoxc14427 ай бұрын
    • 😂😂

      @bobbybinns379@bobbybinns3797 ай бұрын
    • 😂😂😂

      @BS-qg4ep@BS-qg4ep6 ай бұрын
    • BS: his single issue was German bigotry. His strategic stupidity required the construction of battleships instead of aircraft and submarines. Raeder wanted a right wing Nazi government like most Germans. They were stupid enough to think psuedo-scientific bigotry, cruelty and war would make Germany great, like the White West to this very day. There was never any chance of large scale fleet actions by the Kriegsmarine. The strategy was to maintain a "Fleet in Being" to keep Britain's Navy remained in Scapa Flow. Hitler, Raeder, and OKW were too stupid to learn from WWI where German submarines nearly strangled Britain. They were too stupid to continuously improve their combat aircraft until it was too late. Geerman bigotry cost them the war, just as Zelenskiy's government Nazi bigotry is dooming them.

      @richardgraham7055@richardgraham70556 ай бұрын
    • Germany lost the war? Look at the world now! They all lost!

      @gilbertomolina2177@gilbertomolina21776 ай бұрын
  • Great content as always!

    @R2Manny@R2Manny7 ай бұрын
  • Raeder translates to „wheels“. So a common pun among critics was „ mit Raedern soll man nicht übers Wasser fahren“ which translated to „ you should not drive over the water with wheels“

    @theonlymadmac4771@theonlymadmac47717 ай бұрын
  • A lot, of interesting back story and context surrounding the naval build up to the battle of Jutland.

    @wazza33racer@wazza33racer6 ай бұрын
  • Great video as always!

    @toddabowden@toddabowden7 ай бұрын
  • Love your videos guys! Keep up the good work! Best documentaries our there!🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤

    @danielsantiagourtado3430@danielsantiagourtado34307 ай бұрын
  • Excellent as always! Please consider making one for the great statesman Metternich. 🙂

    @JangianTV@JangianTV7 ай бұрын
  • Until my early 20s I thought doenitz was head of the kriegsmarine. Lol. A great book 'the arms of Krupp' corrected that aspect of my history Channel education.

    @FINNIUSORION@FINNIUSORION7 ай бұрын
  • An interesting theory I've read and listened to was had Germany built more u-boats with the steel used for KMS Bismarck and KMS Tirpitz and the Graf Spree there was a good chance that they would've been able to strangle Britain out of the war before the US got involved. However, I do believe that Dontiz was right about Raeder clinging to old naval beliefs. And I believe Raeder was a bit delusional thinking he could take on the Royal Navy, let alone the US Navy. Even Yamamoto knew the Japanese Navy would never defeat the US Navy. If I remember correctly, during the planning for the raid on Pearl Harbor he said something to the effect of "if we do this then I can guarantee to put up a tough fight for the first 6 months but I absolutely have no confidence as to what will happen if it went on for two or three years" and just before the raid he said "for a while we'll have everything our own way stretching out like an octopus spreading its tentacles, but that'll last for a year, a year-and-a-half at most".

    @joshuasill1141@joshuasill11417 ай бұрын
    • Short of the UK suing for peace in 1940 after Dunkirk. The U-Boats were the only realistic way to defeat the British. But that required a much larger U-Boat fleet than Donitz had in 1940-41. After Hitler declared war on America the Battle of the Atlantic was going to be lost by Germany

      @Idahoguy10157@Idahoguy101577 ай бұрын
    • Had Germany had the facilities to build more U-Boats, and had they done so; it is unlikely that Britain would not have reacted with building more convoy escorts. The enemy gets a vote in war, and the Royal Navy was not known for just sitting around waiting passively for the enemy to beat them.

      @PalleRasmussen@PalleRasmussen7 ай бұрын
    • @@PalleRasmussen this would've been early in the war. Germany nearly succeeded in choking off Britain of supplies. Britain was so desperate for ships that when the Lend/Lease program was enacted they were taking the US's mothballed destroyers from WWI and fueling them up and pressing them right into service. If Germany had another 50-100 u-boats, which is the estimate from the steel that Bismarck and Tirpitz used, before either Lend/Lease or mid-1942 (when the US gets fully mobilized) Germany probably forces Britain's surrender.

      @joshuasill1141@joshuasill11417 ай бұрын
    • @@joshuasill1141 The mothballed destroyers pre-dated Lend Lease, and were seen by the Admiralty as a stop gap measure until new construction emerged. They were not, 'pressed right into service, ' but were refitted in Canadian & British yards first. Hasn't it occurred to you that, if Germany had begun a major U-boat building programme before the French Campaign, firstly the boats would have been required to access the Atlantic round the north of Scotland, thus seriously hindering their effectiveness, and secondly, such a programme could only have been aimed at Britain, and the Britisn response was likely to have been an accelerated building programme of anti-submarine sloops, frigates, and corvettes above and beyond the one the British & Canadians actually pursued?

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee70336 ай бұрын
    • It doesn't matter what the Germans would have done, you see. No matter how many ships they would have sunk (as if they wouldn't have sunk proportionally more if they'd built more U-boats, for example), it never would have mattered. That is what these British are trying to tell you. When they say Bismarck and Prince Eugen defeating Hood and Prince of Wales was "luck." It's easy to see that with real luck, German naval prowess could have decimated the RN and stretch British resources beyond politically acceptable limits.

      @2ndavenuesw481@2ndavenuesw4816 ай бұрын
  • TY - very interesting. One point though - the figures given for the battle of Narvik, reflected only the 1st battle - During the 2nd battle - 3 days later - the Germans lost heavily - 8 destroyers sunk or scuttled and 1 U-boat sunk, and the RN lost just 3 damaged destroyers

    @rogerstevens6068@rogerstevens60686 ай бұрын
  • Very good episode .Thanks!

    @edwinsalau150@edwinsalau1506 ай бұрын
  • Great job.

    @ericsedillo7216@ericsedillo72167 ай бұрын
  • Does someone here now what the last song is called? I really like it.

    @Simjorfeo@Simjorfeo7 ай бұрын
  • Very informative and well presented- good job to all that had a hand in producing it. IMHO- Reader was a good Admiral by putting the Navy first and foremost in everything he did, wearing that Swastika and his devotion in Hitler can't be over looked... he was one of THEM- those that knew about the Holocaust atrocities but either did nothing or were directly involved, period.

    @SammyNeedsAnAlibi@SammyNeedsAnAlibi7 ай бұрын
    • Yes, yet another top ranking Nazi who claimed to have known nothing about the Holocaust. On Raeder's professional role I believe Doenitz was correct that Germany should focus on Uboats and not large surface ships.

      @morningstar9233@morningstar92337 ай бұрын
  • He committed no war crimes. His persecution at Nuremberg was proof that the trials were not based on law. Many of the verdicts were just but the judges were often pretending to base them on law. Raeder was a career naval officer who did his duty without committing was crimes. That is different from officers who committed war crimes and used the excuse that they were just following orders.

    @castlerock58@castlerock586 ай бұрын
    • Re: "the trials were not based on law." You let the Hitler-hugging mask slip too easily. Your glorious Führer put a bullet in his brain in a Berlin bunker. It’s been 78 years. Get over it.

      @davidhoward4715@davidhoward47156 ай бұрын
    • Technically ordering commercial shipping to be sunk is a war crime 💁

      @jonnydepp8596@jonnydepp85966 ай бұрын
  • Good vid. But as noted by several commentators here, there were multiple small errors. One thing I would have liked to see more detail on was the rift between Donita and Raeder.

    @ajlancjc99@ajlancjc996 ай бұрын
  • Excellent work and good history

    @marcustrinick2543@marcustrinick25436 ай бұрын
  • Great Work!

    @tjsmith5477@tjsmith54772 ай бұрын
  • BRAVO!!!! AWESOME!!!

    @josealvarado6936@josealvarado69367 ай бұрын
  • Very interesting doku. Thanks.

    @quinntus2559@quinntus25596 ай бұрын
  • Why does this have to happen at 1pm for me, don't they know we like our bed time stories to be as suprise?

    @vilhjj@vilhjj7 ай бұрын
    • Hahahahaha 😂

      @idontcare4490@idontcare44907 ай бұрын
    • Time zones.

      @PeopleProfiles@PeopleProfiles7 ай бұрын
  • BRILLIANT...but is this a new narrator?

    @Jammin-thru-Life@Jammin-thru-Life7 ай бұрын
  • Excellent Film very well done and seller written on. Man who did what his job had him too do.. very Good thank you

    @alexandertroup5324@alexandertroup53247 ай бұрын
  • Well done and interesting. I would have preferred more detail but that would add more time and possibly risk losing the viewer.

    @williammorgan5320@williammorgan53207 ай бұрын
  • As a U.S. Navy Vet; He was a simple sailor loyal in truth only to his Navy. One has to be a sailor to truly understand this.

    @Teddy-tv7rq@Teddy-tv7rq7 ай бұрын
    • would u go along with hitler evil?

      @goyindi@goyindi6 ай бұрын
  • Thanks, still hoping for Rundstedt or Guderian.

    @iwatchDVDsonXbox360@iwatchDVDsonXbox3607 ай бұрын
  • I was unaware of his support for a Mediterranean strategy. That is - indeed - what the Axis Powers should have done - instead of attacking Russia. Naval Power is inherently Strategic - so - I'm not surprised to see that Raeder saw the strategic advantage of this. I just didn't know that he had. At the beginning of 1941 the Germans were at war only with Britain and they were winning. At the end of 1941 the Germans were at war with Britain, the USA and the USSR - and they were doomed. Concentrating on attacking the British Empire - getting the Suez Canal and the oil of the middle east - they also would have then had land access to the the Rare Minerals of Africa. Not having access to those minerals - meant that German machinery (such as jet engines and final drives) broke down sooner than that of Allied Machinery - which did have access to those minerals. Saying that the Med was part of the Italian's Sphere of Influence - meant nothing. If the Germans had *_wanted_* to put a greater effort in that area the Italians certainly would not have tried to stop them. There is a difference between the Germans leaving the Med to the Italians because Hitler wanted to attack Russia - and them being excluded from the Med by the Italians - as if the Italians didn't want them there. In any case - the Germans were going to attack the Russians because that is what Hitler wanted to do. Hitler didn't want to fight the British. He would have preferred to have them come to terms - but- they were largely unable to do anything on the continent anyway so that was good enough for Hitler. Good enough for him to attack the Russians - which is what he wanted to do. .

    @BobSmith-dk8nw@BobSmith-dk8nw7 ай бұрын
    • Hitler was strategical diletant.He did had great land army and oficer core, and he had a lot of luck in the opening stages of the war,but ultimately his strategy thinking and moves were absolute catastrofic for Germany.He did have after the fall of France and before Barbarossa a window of oportunity to acctualy win the war but after the start of the invasion of Soviet union chance for the win was not there.

      @ivanlazarevic78@ivanlazarevic785 ай бұрын
  • I discard the idea of army being apolitical. They are the major force and instrument of any regime, they are the most obliged to be political and questioning government's actions before anybody else.

    @XOPOIIIO@XOPOIIIO7 ай бұрын
    • Indeed. People always pretend the branches don't belong to the same tree. Kind of like politics itself. Two wings one ugly ass bird.

      @SanityIsland@SanityIsland7 ай бұрын
    • That’s how it should be but not how it is.

      @Rick-ve5lx@Rick-ve5lx7 ай бұрын
    • No they aren't they do the governments wishes if what you wish was true American general staff wouldn't have allowed the invasion of Iraq

      @peterrobbins2862@peterrobbins28627 ай бұрын
    • @@peterrobbins2862 Invasion of Iraq was implemented flawlessly, with minimum blood. They also has no intention of conquering Iraqi land. All the problems were from the subsequent civil war among Iraqis themselves.

      @XOPOIIIO@XOPOIIIO7 ай бұрын
  • Anyone who makes war or supports those who make war when that war is a war of aggression is guilty of something.

    @55cook@55cook7 ай бұрын
  • a great strategist, kriegsmarine should be proud it had him. particularly his insistence of the importance of suez canal in deterring britain's war effort was genius, suez canal's importance is showing up to this very day.. Donitz was right tho when he called him or his surface fleet ambitions a dinosaur, as submarines and aircraft carriers are the masters of the sea today and not the big surface ships

    @cristianmicu@cristianmicu6 ай бұрын
  • I personally think his own personal ambitions and ideals is what drove him to stupidly go along with the Nazis.

    @locoHAWAIIANkane@locoHAWAIIANkane7 ай бұрын
    • Like so many decent Germans,stood aside while a bunch of criminals and cruel incompetants brought one of Europes great countries to its knees and destroyed the lives of millions !

      @philiprufus4427@philiprufus44275 ай бұрын
  • The carrier was on its way back home. The dive bombers in Norway were biplanes.

    @myparceltape1169@myparceltape11696 ай бұрын
  • Raeder wasn’t fully positioned to make the role of the Navy important to Hitler’s goals which were set in motion long before the German navy would have been fully operational. He tried to remain relevant but the invasion of the Soviet Union rendered his role being a secondary one. Their failures were devastating and Raeder could not possess the necessary tools to be relevant in the war. Doenitz’s U-Boats were able to interfere with supplies en route to Britain on a consistent basis Raeder’s surface ships couldn’t.

    @cmdrflake@cmdrflake7 ай бұрын
  • Reader was certainly blighted by being surrounded by shiftless thugs. But overall I believe he was an honorable officer who helped make the German navy better. Probably should have gotten 10 years, like Doenitz.

    @pji4994@pji49944 ай бұрын
  • When one gives his loyalty to his government. It's dangerous to have doubts about it,

    @dyu007@dyu0074 күн бұрын
  • Raeder wanted to invade Norway. Raeder followed Hitler's orders pertaining to Commandos. Raeder knew the Germans sank the SS ATHENIA even while blaming the UK. Raeder claims to have known nothing about Hitler's plans for the Jews. Other top brass stated otherwise. Raeder never said anything about removing all Jews serving in the Navy. He knew but only cared about one thing: building up his Navy regardless of other plans.

    @sharonwhiteley6510@sharonwhiteley65106 ай бұрын
    • agree guy was a 'kin nazi prik

      @goyindi@goyindi6 ай бұрын
  • That's just great Reader, a proponent of war and leader of the Navy , , , sends countless young men to their deaths , , , then when things are not going well , , , Reader resigns , , , and quits saying " I don't want to play this game anymore " , , , then lives into his 80's , , , never having missed a dinner , , ,

    @samdigiorgipo@samdigiorgipo6 ай бұрын
    • Nice summation.

      @davidhoward4715@davidhoward47156 ай бұрын
  • Start 5:50

    @kellyaquinastom@kellyaquinastom7 ай бұрын
  • Great documentary is their.plans to do one on kaiser wilhelm ii

    @anthonymcguire8478@anthonymcguire84786 ай бұрын
  • This men like him and Donitz lived in a graysone so to speak and you have to dig deep into them to get some kind of understanding,when you look at things in general the german navy and sailors did not get as bad wrap or punishment in general as the milletery

    @Wenchework@Wenchework7 ай бұрын
    • The Kriegsmarine kept the traditional naval salute until the July bomb plot of 1944, they had an apolitical tradition

      @jamesgornall5731@jamesgornall57317 ай бұрын
    • @@jamesgornall5731 Tru they also had a code of conduct as well even the submariners and I think this was very well known by the allies after some time

      @Wenchework@Wenchework7 ай бұрын
  • Eric Raeder: Loyal To His Navy

    @johnlovero@johnloveroАй бұрын
  • Perfect name for an audacious leader.

    @stuka80@stuka807 ай бұрын
    • Yes it is.⚓🚢😄

      @skyqueen1148@skyqueen11487 ай бұрын
  • Brilliant presentation and narration. IMO neither Raeder nor Dönitz were war criminals and the allies had no business bringing them to trial. Victors "justice".

    @BigAmp@BigAmp7 ай бұрын
    • Agree entirely

      @lostthe80s@lostthe80s6 ай бұрын
    • Yeah , but they were ' kin pissed off and the Nuremberg trials were just a continuation of the war .

      @gordonlandreth9550@gordonlandreth95505 ай бұрын
  • Please share the sources used for the making of this video.

    @KriegsmarineGrossadmiral@KriegsmarineGrossadmiral6 ай бұрын
  • Both Reader & Doenitz should not have been found guilty they were sailors who did their duty. US Admiral Lockwood even testified for Doenitz that he fought the US submarine war in exactly the same manner. It was merely victors justice. Keitle & Jodel couldn’t claim the same clean war that the navy could

    @boatscum@boatscum7 ай бұрын
    • Lammerding SS commander of group responsible for Oradour-sur-Glane had a rather celebrated funeral in Germany attended by many ex SS. All comfortably merged into German society escaping the justice deserved.

      @normannokes9513@normannokes95137 ай бұрын
    • Clean War is an oxymoron

      @kevinvilmont6061@kevinvilmont60616 ай бұрын
  • Please make a documentary on Kurt Student, the founder of Luftwaffe Fallschirmjager

    @tanzilulalam7303@tanzilulalam73035 ай бұрын
  • Second Slesvig war was in 1864 not 1867

    @ThaMan100982@ThaMan1009827 ай бұрын
  • Raeder's earlier influence with Hitler assisted the Allies. Doenitz was denied the vast fleet of u boats to destroy the vital supply line between the USA and Britain. The effectiveness of the u boat campaign is detailed in the excellent Battle for the Atlantic by Jonathan Dimbleby

    @normannokes9513@normannokes95137 ай бұрын
    • Hasn't it occurred to you that, if Germany had begun a major U-boat building programme before the French Campaign, firstly the boats would have been required to access the Atlantic round the north of Scotland, thus seriously hindering their effectiveness, and secondly, such a programme could only have been aimed at Britain, and the Britisn response was likely to have been an accelerated building programme of anti-submarine sloops, frigates, and corvettes above and beyond the one the British & Canadians actually pursued?

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee70336 ай бұрын
    • Surprised to learn we possessed the ship building ability. We relied on elderly American stock to counter the Atlantic menace.@@dovetonsturdee7033

      @normannokes9513@normannokes95136 ай бұрын
  • Was radar named after him?

    @madzen112@madzen1126 ай бұрын
  • Hitler declaring War on the US was an own goal. Had they not declared on the US, American isolationism was still strong. Almost all the US anger was aimed at Japan. Germany had no idea of the true production capacity of US industry. There would have been a strong tendency in Congress to stay out of Europe and concentrate on Japan. Raeder shared this blind spot with Hitler.

    @patricklemire9278@patricklemire92787 ай бұрын
  • The bluecher is NOT a battle cruiser

    @christeankapp6549@christeankapp65497 ай бұрын
  • maybe the bosses at world of warships a game with ships, will watch this documentary and include this commander into the game

    @cristianmicu@cristianmicu6 ай бұрын
  • Save time listen easily at 1.5x

    @jamiedriscoll9781@jamiedriscoll97812 ай бұрын
  • That's not Raeder on the title page.

    @davidatkinson3887@davidatkinson38876 ай бұрын
  • I have no proof, and what I have been told is probably incorrect. However, on my father's side of the family, which is Dutch and German, one of my relatives last names in the US was Reeder. I was always told that through the Reeders, I was distantly related to Admiral Raeder. But, who the hail knows.

    @thunderchief7@thunderchief76 ай бұрын
  • In the first five minutes twqo mistakes. Schleswig Holstein was not "seized" by Prussia. The german federation prevented the integration by Schelswig into Denmark. The school playground is not what you see in germany, it is an american school playground

    @christeankapp6549@christeankapp65497 ай бұрын
  • Darth Raeder

    @samhelsel443@samhelsel4437 ай бұрын
  • Omg! Meu sobrenome é Raeder 😳

    @beatrizraeder9031@beatrizraeder90314 ай бұрын
  • Interesting but rhe the Jutland contraversy waa always a red herring. The German fleet waa never in a position to challenge the Royal Navy, and had no desire to fight a major fleet action it knew it could not win. It waa brought to action against its will, sevearly mauled and skillfully ran away leaving victory to Britain.

    @vespelian@vespelian6 ай бұрын
  • nice pictures but they are often nt related to the topic showing neu-schwanstein castle is just one of many examples. I think you all can do a better job

    @christeankapp6549@christeankapp65497 ай бұрын
  • I dont know why the Germans didn’t just build merchant vessels that had a design and hull easily converted to warships so they could get past the tonnage limits

    @darbyohara@darbyohara6 ай бұрын
  • Great great grandpa

    @calebraeder1795@calebraeder17955 ай бұрын
  • Cant Wait For Gamal Abdel Nasser , Anwar Sadat , HOsni Mubarak , Saddam Hussein And Gaddafi

    @BrianKarolina-ip5mz@BrianKarolina-ip5mz7 ай бұрын
  • Good presentation, with one criticism. If you are going to use German words, learn the pronunciation. If not, just use the English translation. The same applies to any language, not just German.

    @donbalduf572@donbalduf5727 ай бұрын
  • He was a man of his time. He was first a Navy man who served his country. It could have been anybody besides Hitler, and he would have still be loyal to the Navy and his country.

    @Buck1954@Buck19547 ай бұрын
    • but it was hitler. Can't go past that mate

      @goyindi@goyindi6 ай бұрын
  • He was not a nazi. In fact he asked his subordinates and the navy should stay out of politics. In fact the allies committed war crimes bombing civilians and they also sunk axis merchant marines, civilians. The same as the Kriegsmarine .

    @mariocisneros911@mariocisneros9114 ай бұрын
  • I would say he was loyal, to a fault. I think the 10 years in prison was fine in his situation, but he requested death by firing squad, I think that would have been fine and fitting as he didn't do anything other than be a naval officer trying to do what naval officers do...

    @lloydmeadors@lloydmeadors3 ай бұрын
  • Two years younger than Winston Churchill

    @Richard-yt9vi@Richard-yt9vi6 ай бұрын
  • An I was born just over one hundred years after him in the 18 May 1976 and not that far away in Bremerhaven... Lol

    @herbertvonsauerkrautunterh2513@herbertvonsauerkrautunterh25132 ай бұрын
  • It wasn't a Danish province. It was a part of Germany under the King of Denmark, not part of Denmark.

    @2ndavenuesw481@2ndavenuesw4816 ай бұрын
  • Von Rochow is Stolz auf ihn

    @jurgschupbach3059@jurgschupbach30596 ай бұрын
  • President von Hindenburg wanted to restore the Hohenzollern monarchy to power in the 1930s. If he had, all would have been well for Admiral Raeder, and the world in general. It's "funny" how overthrowing the Habsburgs, Hohenzollerns and Romanovs only resulted in millions of people dying for no apparent reason. So much for self determination.

    @fritzbasset8645@fritzbasset86456 ай бұрын
  • The war against the Danes ended in 1864 - and not 1867

    @gerthoffmann8272@gerthoffmann82726 ай бұрын
  • Raeder should have looked at a map 🗺️ as the Canary Islands and Azores aren't in the Mediterranean therefore couldn't be Mediterranean bases!

    @kevanhubbard9673@kevanhubbard96735 ай бұрын
  • Inconnu dans les annales de la Kriegsmarine.

    @RoughRudeDragon@RoughRudeDragon6 ай бұрын
  • Great video and commentary. However, some of the comments in the comment section do not reflect the oath of loyalty to the fatherland, which obliges to obey the government. He took that seriously and for that he should be respected.

    @HendrikPlukaard@HendrikPlukaard7 ай бұрын
    • Really? Government are pirates. I don't respect people who steal and kill for a living.

      @SanityIsland@SanityIsland7 ай бұрын
    • This obscene contrivance relies on naivety. It is the get out clause for every conscience laden skeptic. it seeks to excuse immorality on the basis of blind conformity.

      @Belfreyite@Belfreyite7 ай бұрын
  • Raeder was a conventional thinker, largely devoid of imagination and forethought. If he had been proactive he would have organised that the U-Boats were positioned at the Northern and Southern end of the English channel with Goebbels providing protection from the air so that no evacuation of troops from Dunkirk could have been undertaken without huge losses to British sea and water craft. In that narrow channel was the place to contest the numerically superior British Navy just as the Spartans met the Persians at the pass of Thermopylae. Because all the German Services, for reasons of jealously, tradition, pride and envy, did not co-operate with each other, the war was lost at that moment when Hitler did not press home his sudden defeat of France and destroy the British Expeditionary Force in its entirety.

    @kevinloughrey5135@kevinloughrey51356 ай бұрын
    • When the Germans sent U-boats into the Channel in late 1939, all three were promptly sunk. I didn't know that Goebbels was even a pilot! The troops evacuated from Dunkirk were not done so through the Channel. The Luftwaffe tried very hard to prevent the evacuation, but failed badly. Leonidas lost at Thermopylae. The crucial victory was that of Thermistocles at Salamis. A Naval victory, of course.

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee70336 ай бұрын
  • The Kaiser died in 1941, not 1940

    @jameswalker5223@jameswalker52237 ай бұрын
  • To offer an answer to your question at the end Raeder might simply be regarded as a patriot who at one level failed to make the correct personal choices, but who did what so many of us would likely do. We can judge the architects of Nazism and the key figures, but Raeder was not one of them. Ask the same question in 50 years!

    @marcustrinick2543@marcustrinick25436 ай бұрын
    • 50 years? Since when does morality have a time limit? Nazi Germany was evil 78 years ago and it will still be deemed evil 780 years from now.

      @davidhoward4715@davidhoward47156 ай бұрын
  • Wilhelm II German Kaiser died in 1941 not 1940.

    @Wolf-hh4rv@Wolf-hh4rv7 ай бұрын
  • How many German sailors got to write their biography's , , , not many , , , just the leaders ( royality ) have that privilege , , , , ,

    @samdigiorgipo@samdigiorgipo6 ай бұрын
  • If only he had remained Danish and not beee drummed into following orders. Prussia, the pox at the centre of Europe that invaded France 3 times, Russia twice and tried to starve Britain twice, with submarines.

    @user-ym7cc2xd5f@user-ym7cc2xd5f6 ай бұрын
  • Reader should have been given a whole life sentence, the same as Rudolf Hess.

    @george11419@george114197 ай бұрын
  • )

    @moniquemarie1468@moniquemarie14687 ай бұрын
  • Erich Raeder was a great Grand Admiral of Kriegsmarine whose carried Germany 🇩🇪 ambitious faithfully for becoming the owners of global dominate naval fleets.

    @mohammedsaysrashid3587@mohammedsaysrashid35877 ай бұрын
    • nazi fk

      @goyindi@goyindi6 ай бұрын
  • While it may be argued his cause was the Navy and the pride of Germany, his stature as a preminent figure within the country only served to support the eventual outcomes and as such required he answer to the moral degradation of Germany!

    @davidwicker2248@davidwicker22487 ай бұрын
  • Not guilty

    @user-up2ce1ow8y@user-up2ce1ow8yАй бұрын
  • I must admit I was very surprised by the fact that he was tried and convicted of war crimes,especially since he resigned his post. Also along with Donitz I don't think the two of them would have anything to do with the holocaust. However everyone especially high ranking officials had to have known how most of the military equipment was built by slave labor. I don't really agree with Reader and Donitz serving time for war crimes. I agree with the Allies assertion that these individuals shouldn't be prosecuted as war criminals.

    @jamesleivo8841@jamesleivo88417 ай бұрын
  • Guilty as the rest WITHOUT QUESTION.

    @anniechrisbendy6000@anniechrisbendy60006 ай бұрын
    • @anniechrisbendy6000 They all were.

      @redblack8414@redblack84146 ай бұрын
  • China 2024😳

    @tinabarrette963@tinabarrette9637 ай бұрын
  • “The man known to history as…” STOP! This guy was alive very recently considering the span of history.

    @Socialdogma@Socialdogma7 ай бұрын
  • He kinda looks like the Nazi tank commander in Rat Patrol 📺

    @randywilson944@randywilson9446 ай бұрын
  • We spent trillions of dollars , spent 20 years in Afghanistan and never could control more than 50% of the land at our best point.

    @Rick8191-tv8pg@Rick8191-tv8pg3 ай бұрын
KZhead