Comparing Hebrew And Arabic

No, thank you!

Thanks man

Thank you

Thanks man

Why won’t you lie? You usually do. Why not this time?

Thanks

Thanks. Just learn Arabic; it's about progress, don't worry if you face challenges along the way.

It's like an ocean, if you think of sharks and rpgue waves you won't enjoy yourself. If you swim, frolick, dive and let it carry you, you'll enjoy it.

Thanks, Yeah it's definitely not easy

Thanks

Well from what I have seen it's sort of variable. So you are right that you could interpret both in Hebrew and Arabic alike that these fricatives are velar. I chose to represent them as uvular simply from my experience as a native Hebrew speaker.

I'm sorry I didn't understand the question

@@atbing2425 Arabic asparations are separate and distinguishable.

I'm assuming your point is that Jews aren't Semites apparently

@@atbing2425 No, both Arabs and Israelis would pronounce the final consonant, but a lot of people drop it.

Lol sorry

I'm just so used to these annoying people

@@atbing2425 you need to disarm

I mean, the old Arabic name for Jerusalem was literally bait Al maqdis and that was around when the Romans were occupying the holy land. It's more likely the Arabs adapted the name from the Jews who were in the region.

Israeli

@@atbing2425 LOL

@@yosuf5686that’s not funny

@@calebbrown7025 It's not funny if he's Israeli...yes But the funny thing is that he is Persian and pretends to be an Israeli

@@yosuf5686 oh okay. I was confused

"Modern Hebrew is not Hebrew because it doesn't sound like Arabic"

he's not pronouncing Arabic like a native for the same reason he's not pronouncing English words like a native?? Like why is this so hard for you

They copied the language and called it Hebrew. However, Canaanites continued to live and evolve. Hebrew became a d3@d language

According to the archeological record, (and not the Biblical record as I assume you’re taking) Israelites emerged as a group from within the Canaanites. This means that the Israelites were originally Canaanites but then became unique mostly because of their monolatry. So what I’m trying to say is that the language spoken by the Israelites (ancient Jews) was in fact a Canaanite language. Hebrew comes from the Canaanite branch of the semitic language family.

As for your take on Modern Hebrew, I would love to hear what you think the other languages that comprise Hebrew are. The fact of the matter is that modern Hebrew is incredibly similar to ancient Hebrew differing only really in syntax, and of course, vocabulary. Since Hebrew was only used liturgically for thousands of years many words for modern concepts had to be developed. These words were either developed by extrapolating from existing Hebrew root words or from other similar languages like Arabic. Your assessment that modern Hebrew is merely an “amalgamation of other languages” is far from the truth.

Exactly. There is no such thing as 'Hebrew'. It had always been called, for the majority of its history as a spoken language, 'Canaanite'. Steal the land, Steal the language, claim someone else ancestry, claim falafel is yours, claim Hummus is yours, claim our Levantine music as yours. On top of that, 'Jewish History' is all fabricated and made up of thin air. All these 'archeological findings' are propaganda, exaggerated, and clearly mislabeled (if one delves into a serious academic research regarding this matter) & conflated with the Canaanite archetypes found all over the Levant. The whole thing is a mythology advertised as history.

@@cl9615 Ok jew, how can you determine that israelites emerged as a group from within the Canaanites by relying on archeological record? Answer: you can’t.m, unless there is an ancient scroll that says (israelites emerged from Canaanites) and that doesn’t exist. Canaanites/Phoencians are Arabs. The definition of Arab is (a person that is originally from Arabia/Arabian peninsula). Canaanites/Phoenicians were from Bahrain. Bahrain is part of Arabia/Arabian peninsula. This means that Canaanites/Phoenicians are Arabs by definition. Proof: In the book Geography by Strabo translated by Hans Claude Hamilton and William Falconer in book XVI chapter 3 section 4 the author says: On sailing further, there are other islands, Tyre and Aradus, which have temples resembling those of the Phoenicians. The inhabitants of these islands (if we are to believe them) say that the islands and cities bearing the same name as those of the Phoenicians are their own colonies. William Falconer says in the margin: Besides the islands Tyre and Aradus, there existed even in the time of Alexander, and near the present Cape Gherd, a city called Sidon or Sidodona, which was visited by Nearchus, as may be seen in his Periplus. The Phoenician inhabitants of these places appear to have afterwards removed to the western side of the Persian Gulf, and to the islands Bahrain, to which they gave the names Tylos, or Tyre, and Aradus. The latter name still exists; it was from this place that the Phoenicians moved, to establish themselves on the shores of the Mediterranean, and transferred the name of Sidon, their ancient capital, and those of Tyre and Aradus, to the new cities which they there founded. Gossellin.

What?

There's no such thing as Hebrew. It's just the ancient Canaanite language

There is, in fact, a distinct dialect of Arabic spoken in Palestine no matter how you try and spin it, and there has been for centuries.

@@leseuletuniqueufcassesilte5700 Give me ONE "Palestinian" word - common..

bait

The least delusional Arab

you wrote it too complicated, what exactly is the jewish fallasies, and what's your correction? you say ancient Arabic used the sound "P"? and Arabic wasn't influenced by Greek and Persian, but instead all languages came from Arabic?

@@victor_rybin The Jewish fallacies are numerous from claiming to be chosen people to Jacob wrestling God to the ground and forcing him to grant Palestine to the Jews to their alleged knowledge of the genealogy of people and this is the particular point I make. Semites and other designations of races is a proven fallacy based on scientific historical and biological findings. On the second point Arabs and since ancient times conserved their language and its phonetic, syntactical and morphological traits so the letter ب was consistently pronounced as a B sound never a P sound as ignorant western linguist claim. They argue that since ancient Greek had an alteration between the P sound representing original B sound in addition to P shifting to an F sound (ph) in Greek and because this phenomenon permitted through Hebrew and Ancient Egyptian then the same must have occurred to Arabic. They ignore that the Arab world ( in its overwhelming majority) never fell under Greek rule and that Arabic retained its fixed phonetic nature. As for the age of Arabic it dates to before the 2 thousand BC according to scores of Thamoudic graphites and inscriptions. So yes it long predates both Greek and Hebrew.

Your comment is borderline unreadable. What he is trying to say is that the word “Palestine” has no basis in Arabic, hence why the original “p” sound became “f” in order to accommodate the language difference. To prove this point please tell me what “Palestine” or “Filastin” means in Arabic.

@@cl9615 Phelest is the name of an ancient people thought to have come to Canaan from the Island of Crete. they settled on the southern shores of Canaan well before the Hebrews they assimilated into the population ( Canaan). when the Hebrews invaded the land of Canaan they held the position that the land is only theirs and they began a series of ethnic cleansing ( genocide) against the entire population. Inhabitants of the land ( Canaani, Phelest and bedwen Arabs) united and assimilated . The name of Phelest is pronounced with a an F sound not a P. when the Greeks occupied the land they gave it the name Phelest ( not able to pronounce the F sound) . This is the origin of the name it was used first as a general term to include all of the land of Canaan and it lasted to date. Jews living in the land were unable to conquer the southern shores of the land due to the unity between the Phelest and the bedewn Arabs. The Phelest assimilated into Arabs under the Nabatean kingdom ruling the largest part of the land ( southern Palestine , Sinai peninsula, Jordan and northern Saudi Arabia) from before Christ. while Jews remained under Greek rule and called the area they lived in ( in parts of todays west bank of Palestine as Judea. the same situation continued under the Romans . When Arab Muslim armies liberated the land from the occupying Byzantine empire they used the name to term the newly liberated land. Christians and Jews were protected and their religious rights were respected. This is the history of the land, names , people and religion. if you can't bear that too that is your problem. I know of certain others who have a serious problem with the reality of history and would rather prefer fabrications. Nevertheless, the objective reality when coupled with will of the people will always prevail. bare it or not it is the least of my concerns.

Hebrew isn’t even on the same branch as Arabic. Hebrew and Aramaic are on the same branch. Hebrew and Phoenician are dialects of Canaanite. If Hebrew were a dialect of Arabic, that would mean that Phoenician is also a dialect of Arabic, but that’s not true either. There vowels and consonant changes found in Hebrew clearly give away that it is not descended from Arabic, not Arabic is descended from Hebrew. Both, however, are descended of an earlier language that passed through several stages before they even became Hebrew and Arabic.

What Bullshit! The linguistic structure of Biblical Hebrew is ENOUGH evidence to prove that not only did all other ancient languages originate from Hebrew itself after separation incident at the Tower of Babel but also that Hebrew was the first language created by God and it was used to create the universe hence Adam & Eve also spoke it! Stop bullshitting people! Your Arabic came much later!

BS

No it is not, stop it

What a bunch of crap.

Palestine is a real region, same as Mesopotamia, Caucasus, etc. Maybe you're in a wrong place for political controvercies

Jordanian and Palestinian dialects are different

Palestinian Arabic objectively is a real thing, and you cannot deny that no matter which side of ethnic cleansing you support. Your denial of such a dialect is further proof that what you are doing is ethnic cleansing.

​@@leseuletuniqueufcassesilte5700 i don't think Israelis commit ethnic cleansing, and that their denial of Palestinian culture proves their malintent. Israelis just propagate the correct idea that Palestinians are random Arabs, and that the Palestinian identity was created as a weapon against Israel. but Israelis overdo it, often denying _"Palestine"_ as a region, or _"Palestinian something"_ as a thing

@@leseuletuniqueufcassesilte5700 i don't think Israelis commit ethniс сleаnsing, and that their denial of Palestinian culture proves their mаlintеnt. Israelis just propagate the correct idea that Palestinians are random Arabs, and that the Palestinian identity was created as a wеapоn against Israel. but Israelis overdo it, often denying _"Palestine"_ as a region, or _"Palestinian something"_ as a thing